study the effect of various extracellular matrix proteins on...

29
58 CHAPTER 5 Study the effect of various extracellular matrix proteins on adhesion, proliferation and osteoblast differentiation of bone marrow derived human mesenchymal stem cells 5.1 Introduction Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely used in bone tissue engineering (BTE) applications (Marot et al., 2010; Mauney et al., 2005; Fibbe et al., 2002). The scaffold materials used for the BTE are reported to influence the differentiation of the MSCs to osteoblasts (Prichard et al., 2007; Roach et al., 2007; Meinel et al., 2004). MSCs adhere to a biomaterial by an indirect mechanism mediated through specific proteins from the serum containing media adsorbed on the material surface (Clegg et al., 2005; Sawyer et al., 2005). Therefore, the type of cell and the nature of the biomaterial are the two major factors that regulate the cell adhesion and proliferation. Biomimetic or bio-inspired approach of MSC based bone tissue engineering suggests the potential use of extracellular matrix (ECM) based scaffolds for enhancing differentiation and thereby improving bone regeneration (Zhang et al., 2007; Hattar et al., 2005; Vagaska et al., 2010; Semino, 2008). During the osteogenesis of MSC in vivo, the ECM is dynamically remodelled to modulate intracellular signalling during stem cell differentiation (Hoshiba et al., 2011; Nakamura et al., 2005; Sasano et al., 2000; Kamiya et al., 2001). Application of ECM components or equivalents in scaffold fabrication and implant modification has shown promising results (Garcia and Reyes, 2005; Badylak et al., 2009). Previous studies

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 58

    CHAPTER 5

    Study the effect of various extracellular matrix proteins on adhesion,

    proliferation and osteoblast differentiation of bone marrow derived

    human mesenchymal stem cells

    5.1 Introduction

    Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely used in bone tissue engineering

    (BTE) applications (Marot et al., 2010; Mauney et al., 2005; Fibbe et al., 2002). The

    scaffold materials used for the BTE are reported to influence the differentiation of the

    MSCs to osteoblasts (Prichard et al., 2007; Roach et al., 2007; Meinel et al., 2004).

    MSCs adhere to a biomaterial by an indirect mechanism mediated through specific

    proteins from the serum containing media adsorbed on the material surface (Clegg et al.,

    2005; Sawyer et al., 2005). Therefore, the type of cell and the nature of the biomaterial

    are the two major factors that regulate the cell adhesion and proliferation. Biomimetic or

    bio-inspired approach of MSC based bone tissue engineering suggests the potential use of

    extracellular matrix (ECM) based scaffolds for enhancing differentiation and thereby

    improving bone regeneration (Zhang et al., 2007; Hattar et al., 2005; Vagaska et al.,

    2010; Semino, 2008). During the osteogenesis of MSC in vivo, the ECM is dynamically

    remodelled to modulate intracellular signalling during stem cell differentiation (Hoshiba

    et al., 2011; Nakamura et al., 2005; Sasano et al., 2000; Kamiya et al., 2001). Application

    of ECM components or equivalents in scaffold fabrication and implant modification has

    shown promising results (Garcia and Reyes, 2005; Badylak et al., 2009). Previous studies

  • 59

    showed enhancement of cell adhesion and differentiation on biomimetic ECM based

    scaffolds or coating (Chen et al., 2008; Datta et al., 2005).

    ECM is an important part of the cellular microenvironment, which along with

    various growth factors play a significant role in regulating the differentiation and

    development (Adams and Watt, 1993; Allori et al., 2008). ECM have a major role in

    deciphering the cell behaviour and function by regulating cell adhesion, differentiation,

    migration, apoptosis, proliferation, phenotype and growth (Hidalgo-Bastida and Cartmell,

    2010). Collagen type I, elastin, laminin, fibronectin and vitronectin are the major proteins

    present in the ECM. Collagen type I is the major protein present in the ECM of bone and

    it is known to play a significant role in mineralization (Mizuno and Kuboki, 2001). It is

    widely used in bone tissue engineering applications (Keogh et al., 2010; Chevallay and

    Herbage, 2000). Collagen coating on various biomaterials has shown to improve cell

    adhesion (Munisamy et al., 2008). Laminin is present in basal laminae and they assist in

    cell adhesion (Carlsson et al., 1981; Mochizuki et al., 2003). Fibronectin and vitronectin

    are present in ECM as well as in serum and they promote cell adhesion and spreading

    (Underwood and Bennett, 1989; Wittmer et al., 2007).

    With the development in the field of cell based tissue engineering, the focus of the

    research is now in identifying novel scaffolds and/ or modifying the existing in order to

    achieve the best performance for faster and effective tissue regeneration. A thorough

    understanding of the cell-biomaterial interaction is essential in manipulating the material

    performance and cell behaviour. Since the cell-biomaterial interactions are adsorbed

    protein mediated, surface modification of the biomaterial to improve the specific protein

    adsorption is an option to improve the biomaterial performance. Another approach to

    improve the cell-biomaterial interaction is to coat the biomaterial surface with desired

  • 60

    proteins, which will increase the cell adhesion and / or enhance the specific

    differentiation

    In this study, we have selected collagen type I, fibronectin, laminin, and

    vitronectin, the four major ECM proteins, to evaluate their effect on the adhesion and

    osteoblast differentiation of adult bone marrow derived human MSCs (hMSCs). This

    study was aimed at understanding the role of specific ECM proteins at different phases of

    osteoblast differentiation in terms of osteoblast differentiation associated gene expression

    and their correlation with alkaline phosphatase expression and mineralization. The data

    obtained is of significance in developing a biomimetic microenvironment for directing

    hMSCs to achieve a functional bone construct for orthopaedic applications.

    5.2 Materials and methods

    5.2.1 Preparation of ECM protein treated plates

    Protein Recommended

    concentration

    Experimental

    concentration

    Collagen type I 6-10µg/cm2 6 µg/cm

    2

    Fibronectin 1-5 µg/cm2 1µg/cm

    2

    Laminin 1-10 µg/cm2 1 µg/cm

    2

    Vitronectin 0.1 µg/cm2 0.1 µg/cm

    2

    Table 5.1 Coating density of the ECM treated plates.

    The ECM proteins such as collagen type I from human placenta, fibronectin from

    human plasma, laminin from Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm murine sarcoma basement

    membrane and vitronectin from human plasma were purchased from BD Bioscience

    (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Tissue culture plates were coated with the ECM proteins

    according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The coating density of each protein used in

  • 61

    this experiment is given in table 5.1 and it was within the range of the recommended

    concentration. The protein stock solutions were prepared by dissolving the sterile

    lyophilized powder in appropriate sterile solvents solutions in a laminar flow hood under

    sterile conditions. Filter sterilized acetic acid (0.1M) was used as solvent and diluent for

    Collagen type I. Sterile DPBS was used as solvent and diluent for fibronectin. Sterile

    basal media was used as solvent and diluent for laminin. Sterile distilled water was used

    as solvent and diluent for vitronectin. Working solutions of the proteins were made

    according to the surface area of the culture plates used. The final volume was sufficiently

    diluted so that the volume added covered the surface of the plate evenly. For coating a

    35mm culture plate having approximately 10cm2 surface areas, 1ml of the protein

    solution was used. Preparation of the working solutions of the selected ECM proteins for

    coating a 35mm culture plate is given in Table 5.2. The plates were covered with the

    respective protein solutions in a laminar flow hood under sterile conditions and incubated

    at room temperature (RT) for 1h. After 1h, the solutions were removed and the plates

    were washed once with 1ml of distilled water before seeding the cells. These plates were

    referred to as ECM protein treated plates henceforth.

    Protein Stock

    concentration

    Required

    concentration for

    10 cm2 area

    Volume of

    protein for

    1ml

    Diluent

    Volume

    of diluent

    for 1ml

    Collagen type I 1mg/ml 60µg /ml 60µl 0.1M acetic

    acid 940µl

    Fibronectin 1mg/ml 10µg /ml 10µl DPBS 990µl

    Laminin 1mg/ml 10µg /ml 10µl Basal media 990µl

    Vitronectin 10µg/ml 1µg /ml 100µl Distilled water 900µl

    Table 5.2 Preparation ECM protein working solutions.

  • 62

    5.2.2 Human MSC adhesion and proliferation on ECM protein treated plates

    Human MSCs were isolated and characterized from the bone marrow of adult

    human volunteers by the method mentioned under Section 4.2.5. The cells were isolated

    and propagated in hMSC culture media (Table 4.2).Human MSCs were seeded at a

    density of 5000 cells per sq. cm on each of the ECM protein treated plates. Untreated

    tissue culture plates were used as the control for these experiments. The plates were

    placed in a humidified incubator maintained at 370C with 5% CO2 in the air. After 24h of

    incubation, they were observed under an inverted phase contrast microscope (Nikon

    Eclipse TE2000-S, Nikon Instruments Inc, Melville, NY, USA) for cell morphology and

    adherence.

    5.2.2.1 Doubling time

    For doubling time calculations, cells were trypsinized at specific time points and

    viable cell number was determined by trypan blue exclusion test (Section 4.2.7).

    Doubling time (DT) was calculated by the formula:

    DT = t log 2 / (log Nt- log N0),

    Where, t is the time, Nt is the number of cells harvested at time t and N0 is the initial

    number of seeded cells.

    5.2.3 Osteoblast differentiation studies on the ECM protein treated plates

    The hMSCs grown on ECM protein treated plates were induced to osteoblast

    differentiation by growing them in osteogenic induction media (Table 4.3). The plates

    were observed under an inverted phase contrast microscope at regular intervals for

    morphological changes and mineral deposition. Osteoblast differentiation was evaluated

  • 63

    at different time points by methods such as alkaline phosphate (ALP) staining, ALP

    assay, histochemical staining for secreted mineral matrix, calcium assay and osteoblast

    differentiation associated gene expression.

    5.2.3.1 Alkaline phosphatase staining

    Staining to demonstrate ALP was done after 7days of osteogenic induction by 5-

    bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BCIP) / nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) method. The

    reagent BCIP/NBT was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The

    media was aspirated completely and the plates were washed thrice with DPBS. The

    BCIP/NBT premixed solution was added to the plates and incubated at 37 ºC in the same

    culture conditions for 30min. The plates were then observed under an inverted phase

    contrast microscope (Nikon Eclipse TE2000-S, Nikon Instruments Inc, Melville, NY,

    USA) for cells stained as bluish black or brownish black. The images were captured using

    QCapture Pro 6 software.

    5.2.3.2 ALP assay

    For the ALP assay, the total protein extract was collected on day 0, 7, 14

    and 21 of osteogenic induction. Cells were harvested using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA

    (GIBCO, Invitrogen, NY, USA) and the cell pellet was washed thrice with DPBS. Total

    protein was extracted with the help of a 1ml homogenizer using 200ul of 1% Triton X in

    DPBS containing 1X protease inhibitor and 1mM PMSF (Phenylmethanesulfonyl

    fluoride), (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The cell lysate was then centrifuged at

    3000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant containing the protein extract was then transferred

    to a fresh 1.5ml microcentrifuge tube (Eppendorf AG, Germany) tube and stored at -80

    ºC

    until use.

  • 64

    5.2.3.2.1 Bradford assay

    Total protein in the protein extract was estimated by Bradford Assay (Sigma-

    Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Protein standards of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1 and 1.4mg/ml of

    bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were prepared in

    DPBS buffer. The Bradford reagent was mixed gently and brought to RT before use. 5ul

    each of standards and protein test samples were added to separate wells of a 96 well

    microtitre plate. To each well 250μl of the Bradford reagent was added and mixed well

    on a shaker for 30sec. The plate was incubated at room temperature for 30min. The

    absorbance was measured at 595nm in a spectrophotometric plate reader (VICTOR 3TM

    Multilabel Counter, model 1420–032, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The amount

    of protein present in the test sample was determined from the standard curve by the

    following formula.

    Test protein (mg/ml) = (Test absorbance / Standard absorbance) ×

    Concentration of the standard (mg/ml)

    5.2.3.2.2 AMP (2-amino-2-methyl-l-propanol) substrate buffer

    The AMP-substrate buffer was prepared by making a 0.5M AMP solution in

    distilled water at pH 10. The buffer was supplemented with 2mM MgCI2 and 9mM p-

    nitrophenyl phosphate (p-NPP).

    5.2.3.2.3 p-Nitrophenol (p-NP) standards

    Standard concentrations were prepared using p-NP in appropriate volumes of

    0.5M AMP buffer (pH 10) and were stored in the dark at 4 ºC until use. The standards

    ranged from 0 - 0.5mM.

  • 65

    5.2.3.2.4 ALP assay

    The assay was performed by adding 100µl of each p-nitrophenol (p-NP) standard

    and 50 µl of the thawed test sample to separate wells of a 96-well microtiter plate. 50µl of

    AMP-substrate buffer containing p-nitrophenyl phosphate (p-NPP) was then added to

    each of the test samples. After incubation at 37ºC, the absorbance was measured at 405nm

    at 5min intervals for 30min using a spectrophotometric plate reader (VICTOR 3TM

    Multilabel Counter, model 1420–032, Perkin Elmer). A standard curve of absorbance

    versus p-NP concentration was generated and used to determine the concentration of p-

    NP formed in the test sample. The amount of ALP present was then normalized to the

    amount of total protein present. The change in the level of ALP activity at different time

    points of differentiation when compared to the level in the starting undifferentiated (day

    0) cells were calculated and graphs were generated. All the ALP assay reagents were

    purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA)

    5.2.3.3 Histochemical staining for calcium

    Alizarin Red S and von Kossa staining for calcium were used for the

    demonstration of calcium in the secreted mineral matrix of osteoblasts. Alizarin Red S

    staining (Section 4.2.9.3.1) was performed on day 14 and Von Kossa staining (Section

    4.2.9.3.2). The macroscopic view photographs were taken using Nikon D3000 digital

    camera.

    5.2.3.4 Quantification of calcium

    The plates were removed for calcium quantification on day 21 of osteogenic

    induction. After the media was removed completely, the plates were washed thrice with

    DPBS. The cells were decalcified with 0.6N HCl (Merck) for 24h, in a shaker at RT. The

  • 66

    calcium content was determined by measuring the concentrations of calcium in the HCl

    supernatant by the O-cresolphthalein complexone method (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis,

    MO, USA). After decalcification, the plates were washed three times with PBS and the

    cells were solubilised with 0.1N NaOH / 0.1% SDS containing 1X protease inhibitor and

    1mM PMSF in a homogenizer. The cell lysate was then centrifuged at 3000rpm for

    15min. The supernatant containing the protein extract was then transferred to a fresh

    1.5ml centrifuge tube (Eppendorf AG, Germany) and stored at -80

    ºC until use. The

    protein content was measured by Bradford assay (Section 5.2.3.2.1). The calcium content

    on the cell layer was normalized to the total protein content.

    5.2.3.5 Gene expression analysis

    5.2.3.5.1 RNA isolation

    Plates were removed on day 0, 7, 14 and 21 of osteogenic induction for RNA

    isolation. After completely removing the media, the plates were washed thrice with

    DPBS. 1ml of TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to the 35mm

    culture plate and the cells were lysed well with repeated pipetting. The cell lysate was

    collected and stored in 1.5ml centrifuge tubes (Eppendorf, AG, Germany) at -80

    ºC until

    further processing. For isolating the RNA, first, the tubes were thawed and the contents

    were mixed well. 0.2 ml of chloroform per 1ml TRI reagent was added and shaken

    vigorously for 15- 30sec by hand. The tubes were incubated at RT for 5-15min. The tubes

    were then centrifuged at 11,000 rpm for 15min at 4 ºC. The upper aqueous phase

    containing the total RNA was removed carefully to a fresh 1.5ml centrifuge tube. 0.5ml

    IPA was added per 1ml of TRI reagent used and incubated at RT 10min. The tubes were

    then centrifuged at 11000 rpm for 10min at 4 ºC. The supernatant was removed carefully

    without disturbing the loose RNA pellet. The pellet was washed by adding 1ml of 75%

  • 67

    ethanol per ml of TRI reagent used and centrifuging at 11000 rpm for 5 min at 4ºC. The

    pellet was dried at RT and re-suspended in 200μl of DEPC treated water. The isolated

    RNA was quantified using NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies Inc.

    USA) and the samples were stored at -80

    ºC until further processing.

    5.2.3.5.2 Preparation of cDNA

    cDNA was prepared from 1µg of RNA. Before preparing the cDNA, the RNA was

    treated with DNAse (Fermentas Life Sciences, EU). The reagents given in table 5.3 were

    added in the same order to a nuclease free PCR tube and kept at 37 ºC for 30min in a

    thermo cycler (Veriti, Applied Biosystems, UK).

    Reagent Quantity

    RNA 1µg

    10X Reaction buffer with MgCl2 1µl

    DEPC treated water To make 9µl

    DNAse 1, RNAse free(1 u / µl) 1µl

    Table 5.3 Reagent compositions for DNAse treatment.

    The reaction was stopped by adding 1µl of 25mM EDTA that was kept for 65 ºC for

    10min in a thermo cycler. The DNAse treated RNA was used as the template for reverse

    transcriptase for cDNA synthesis.

    cDNA was prepared with the DNA first strand synthesis kit (Fermentas Life

    Sciences, EU) and the reactions were set on ice. 11µl of DNAse treated RNA and 1µl of

    random hexamers were added to a nuclease free PCR tube, mixed gently, centrifuged

    briefly, incubated at 65 ºC for 5min in a thermo cycler and chilled. The following reagents

    given in table 5.4 was added in the same order to the tube and incubated at 25 ºC for 5min

  • 68

    followed by 60min at 37 ºC. The reaction was terminated by heating at 70

    ºC for 5min.

    The prepared cDNA was stored at -80

    ºC until further processing.

    Reagent Quantity

    5X Reaction buffer 4ml

    Ribolock RNAse inhibitor (20U / µl) 1µl (20U)

    10mM dNTP mix 2µl (1mM)

    M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (20U / µl) 2µl (40U)

    Table 5.4 Master Mix compositions.

    5.2.3.5.3 Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction

    The expression level of osteoblasts differentiation associated genes like Runt

    related-transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), alkaline phosphatase for liver/bone/kidney

    (ALPL), collagen, type I, alpha I (COL1A1), secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) /

    osteopontin(OPN), secreted protein, acidic, cysteine-rich (SPARC )/ Osteonectin (ON),

    Sp7 transcription factor (SP7) / Osterix (OSX), integrin-binding sialoprotein (IBSP) and

    bone gamma-carboxyglutamate (gla) protein (BGLAP) / Osteocalcin (OCN) were done.

    All the primers were obtained from Bioneer (Daejeon, South Korea). The accession

    number and sequences of all the primers used in this experiment are given in table 5.5.

    Quantitative Real time PCR was performed in a 7500 Real Time PCR system

    (Applied Biosystems, UK) using 7500 system SDS (Sequence detecting software)

    software for the specific primers with Power SYBR Green real time PCR kit (Applied

    Biosystems, Warrington, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A reaction

    volume of 10µl was set up in triplicate for each template cDNA sample (Table 5.6). The

    reactions were carried out in the wells of a MicroAmp® optical 96-well reaction plate

    (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK). The plate was sealed with MicroAmp® optical

  • 69

    adhesive films. The plate was centrifuged to spin down the contents and eliminate air

    bubbles from the solutions. The plate was loaded into the plate holder of the Real Time

    PCR machine.

    GenBank

    Accession. No. Gene Forward Primer Sequence, 5’ -3’ Reverse Primer Sequence, 5’ -3’

    Product

    size, bp

    NM_199173.3 BGLAP GACTGTGACGAGTTGGCTGA GAAGAGGAAAGAAGGGTGCC 138

    NM_001127501.1 ALPL GAGGTGGCATGAAGCTCAGT ACCTGCTTTATCCCTGGAGC 162

    NM_004348.3 RUNX2 ATTTCTCACCTCCTCAGCCC CAACAGCCACAAGTTAGCGA 135

    NM_001040058.1 SPP1 TCTCCTAGCCCCACAGAATG GTCAATGGAGTCCTGGCTGT 154

    NM_000088.3 COL1A1 CATCTCCCCTTCGTTTTTGA CCAAATCCGATGTTTCTGCT 109

    NM_003118.2 SPARC GTGCAGAGGAAACCGAAGAG TCATTGCTGCACACCTTCTC 172

    NM_004967.3 IBSP AACCTACAACCCCACCACAA AGGTTCCCCGTTCTCACTTT 149

    NM_152860.1 SP7 GCCAGAAGCTGTGAAACCTC GCTGCAAGCTCTCCATAACC 161

    NR_003286.2 RN18S1 CGGCTACCACATCCAAGGAAG AGCTGGAATTACCGCGGCT 188

    Table 5.5 The sequences and accession number of the primers used for the real time PCR.

    Sl. No. Component Volume

    1 2X SYBR Green PCR master mix 5µl

    2 Forward primer 0.25µl

    3 Reverse primer 0.25µl

    4 Template cDNA 0.5µl

    5 DEPC water 4µl

    Table 5.6 Real time PCR reaction mix (10µl) composition.

    The program was set for an initial activation at 95 ºC for 5min. This was followed by 40

    cycles of two-step cycling, consisting of a denaturation step at 60 ºC for 10sec and a

    combined annealing/extension step at 60 ºC for 35sec. Data was analysed using 7500

    system SDS software and the cycle threshold or the Ct value, which correlated with the

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&id=158517828http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&id=188595717http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&id=66934968http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&id=91206461http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&id=110349771http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&id=48675809http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&id=167466186http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&id=22902135http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&id=225637497

  • 70

    starting quantity of the target mRNA was used for further calculations and analysis of the

    gene expression levels. The Ct value for the interested genes were normalised to the 18S

    rRNA expression levels. ΔCt was calculated as the difference in the Ct value between the

    differentiated and undifferentiated (Day 0) cells. ΔΔCt was calculated as the difference in

    the Ct values between the ECM treated and untreated plates at different stages of

    osteoblast differentiation. The fold difference in the gene expression level of cells when

    differentiated on ECM protein treated plates with respect to the untreated plates was

    calculated by the formula:

    Fold change = 2-ΔΔCt

    5.2.3.6 Statistical analysis

    The experiments were repeated with three different donor samples. The graphs

    depicted a representative experiment done in duplicates. The measure for each sample

    was performed in triplicates and the results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation

    (SD). The statistical analysis was done by the two tailed, paired Student’s t test. In all the

    analysis a p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant and asterisks were given

    accordingly to indicate the level of significance as *p

  • 71

    (Table 5.7). Similarly, hMSCs grown on laminin and fibronectin treated plates showed

    marked reduction in doubling time (41.5 ± 11.1h and 48.7 ± 19.1h respectively).

    However, hMSC grown on vitronectin treated plate showed similar proliferation rate and

    doubling time as that on the untreated plate (57.7 ± 19.7h vs. 65.7 ± 23.4h).

    Figure 5.1 Human MSCs on ECM protein treated plates. Phase contrast microscopy showed adherent

    spindle shaped fibroblast like cells on all the tested plates after 24h of incubation. Scale bar-50µm.

    Plate Doubling time (DT) in h (Mean ± SD)

    Untreated 65.7 ± 23.4

    Collagen type I 39.7 ± 6.9

    Fibronectin 48.7 ± 19.1

    Laminin 41.5 ± 11.1

    Vitronectin 57.7 ± 19.7

    Table 5.7 Doubling time (DT) of hMSCs on ECM protein treated plates (n=5).

  • 72

    5.3.2 Osteoblast differentiation studies on the ECM protein treated plates

    Human MSCs grown on ECM treated plates were subjected to osteoblast

    differentiation. Here, we observed that cells grown on untreated and ECM treated plates

    showed initiation of mineralization in the second week of differentiation (Fig. 5.2K-O).

    However, early onset of mineralization was observed in the cells grown on collagen type

    I (Fig. 5.2G) treated plate when compared to the cells grown on other ECM treated and

    untreated plates. The phase contrast micrographs showed visible mineral deposition in all

    the plates except on laminin treated plate (Fig. 5.2N) on day 14 of osteogenic induction.

    Among the group, large amount of secreted bone matrix was observed in the cells grown

    on collagen type I treated plate. As the differentiation progressed, there was marked

    increase in the mineral deposition, which was evident from the phase contrast

    micrographs on day 21 of osteogenic induction.

    Figure 5.2 Phase contrast microscopy of the hMSCs undergoing osteoblast differentiation on ECM

    protein treated plates. Onset of mineralization is visible on collagen type I treated plate on day 7 of

    osteogenic induction (G, yellow arrow, inset shows the area marked within the red squire at higher

    magnification). High mineralization was seen on this plate on day 14 (L) and 21(Q) of differentiation also.

    Fibronectin (M, R) and vitronectin (O, P) treated plates also showed good mineralization (day 14 and 21).

    Laminin treated plate (S) showed lower mineral deposits even after 21 days of osteogenic induction. Scale

    bar - 10µm.

  • 73

    5.3.2.1 ALP staining and assay

    Alkaline phosphatase staining performed after 7days of osteogenic induction was

    very helpful in assessing the osteogenic potential of the cells grown on ECM treated

    plates at the initial stages of differentiation. High ALP positive cells were observed in the

    cells grown on collagen type I, fibronectin and vitronectin as compared to that of laminin

    treated plate and untreated plate (Fig. 5.3).

    Figure 5.3 ALP staining by NBT/ BCIP method. Representative figures showing cells stained positive

    for ALP on different ECM protein treated plates. More ALP positive cells were observed on collagen type I

    (B), fibronectin (C) and vitronectin (E) treated plates when compared to the untreated (A) and laminin (D)

    treated plates. Scale bar - 10µm.

    ALP assay revealed that ALP activity was more in the cells grown on collagen

    type I treated plates at day 7 of osteogenic induction (Fig. 5.4). ALP activity was lower

    on day 7 of induction in the cells grown on fibronectin, laminin and vitronectin treated

  • 74

    plate. ALP activity significantly (p< 0.01) increased from day 7 to day 14 of osteogenic

    induction on all the tested plates. Vitronectin treated plate showed the highest ALP

    activity (p

  • 75

    5.3.2.2 Alizarin Red S and von Kossa staining for calcium

    Alizarin Red S staining performed on day 14 of osteogenic induction showed a

    positive staining for calcium on all the tested plates (Fig. 5.5). Collagen type I treated

    plate showed the highest calcium deposition when compared to all other ECM protein

    treated and untreated plates. The staining revealed high calcium deposits on fibronectin as

    well as vitronectin treated plates also. Laminin treated plate however; showed very

    marginal amount of calcium deposits. Macroscopic view showed visible areas of positive

    staining on collagen type I, fibronectin and vitronectin treated plates. The higher

    mineralization on collagen type I treated plates was clearly visible in the macroscopic

    view photograph.

    von Kossa staining performed on day 21 of osteogenic induction showed secreted

    mineral matrix on all the tested plates (Fig. 5.6). Collagen type I and vitronectin treated

    plate showed remarkably high amount of mineral deposits as evidenced by the phase

    contrast micrographs and macroscopic view photographs. Fibronectin treated plates also

    showed good amount of mineral deposits. Among the tested plates, laminin treated plates

    showed the lowest calcium deposits.

    5.3.2.3 Calcium assay

    Quantification of calcium in the secreted mineral matrix showed two fold higher

    amount of calcium on vitronectin treated plate than the untreated plate (Fig. 5.7).

    However, plates treated with collagen type I and fibronectin showed similar amount of

    calcium as that on the untreated plate. The amount of calcium was found to be

    significantly lower in the cells grown on laminin treated plates.

  • 76

    Figure 5.5 Alizarin Red S staining for calcium. The plates stained with Alizarin Red S stain on day 14 of

    osteogenic induction. Collagen type I plate showed the highest mineralization, which is evident from the

    more stained area (G) with highest intensity of staining (B). Fibronectin (C, H) and vitronectin (E, J) treated

    plates also showed better staining than the untreated plate. Laminin treated plate (D, I) showed the lowest

    staining. Scale bar - 10µm.

    Figure 5.6 Von Kossa staining for calcium. The plates stained by von Kossa method on day 21 of

    osteogenic induction. Collagen type I (B, G) and vitronectin (E, J) treated plate showed the highest staining

    followed by fibronectin (C, H). The degree of staining was minimal on laminin treated plate (D, I). Phase

    contrast micrographs, Scale bar - 10µm.

  • 77

    Figure 5.7 Calcium assay on day 21 of osteogenic induction. Vitronectin treated plate showed the highest

    amount of calcium. Significant two fold higher calcium was seen on vitronectin treated plate when

    compared to collagen type I, fibronectin and untreated plates. Collagen type I treated plate had similar

    calcium level as that of the untreated plate, whereas, fibronectin treated plate showed slightly higher

    calcium level. The amount of calcium in the secreted matrix of laminin was very low compared to all the

    other plates. (*p

  • 78

    Among the tested ECM proteins, collagen type I treated plates showed the

    maximum up-regulation of osteoblast differentiation associated genes. Early stage of

    differentiation on these plates showed the highest expression of ALPL (47 fold, p< 0.01)

    and a relatively high expression of RUNX2 (two fold). The ALPL expression level

    decreased to three fold (p< 0.01) at the mid stage (day 14) which was further down

    regulated towards the late stage of differentiation. The mid stage of differentiation also

    showed the up-regulation of OPN (14 fold, p< 0.01), OCN (six fold, p

  • 79

    Figure 5.8 Osteoblast differentiation associated gene expression profile. Collagen type I treated plate

    showed significantly high expression of OPN, ALPL IBSP and OCN. Fibronectin treated plate showed

    significant increase in the expression of ALPL, OSX and OCN. Laminin treated plate showed significant

    increase in COL1A1, IBSP, OSX and OCN expression. Vitronectin treated plate showed significant

    increase in ALPL, IBSP and OCN expression. There was marked increase in OPN expression also.

    (*p

  • 80

    the osteoblast differentiation associated genes such as COL1A1, OPN, ALPL, ON and

    OCN remained unchanged throughout the differentiation process. Only genes that

    showed higher gene expression were RUNX2 (six fold) and OSX (6 fold, p< 0.01) at

    early stage, and IBSP (14 fold, p< 0.01) and ON at mid stage of osteoblast differentiation.

    None of the genes was shown up-regulated at late stage of differentiation (Fig 5.8).

    5.4 Discussion

    The role of ECM in regulating cell adhesion and differentiation is well established

    (Reilly and Angler, 2010). This is the first detailed study showing the effect of ECM

    proteins on proliferation of hMSCs and their differentiation into osteoblast in terms of

    ALP activity, bone matrix secretion, calcium deposits and osteoblast differentiation

    associated gene expression. ECM protein mediated enhancement of proliferation,

    osteoblast differentiation and mineralization of hMSCs were evidenced from our studies.

    The gene expression profile showed that collagen type I, fibronectin, and vitronectin

    played important role in enhancing differentiation and thereby improving bone

    regeneration. Among the ECMs that were used in the current experiment, collagen type-I

    showed maximum up-regulation of osteoblast differentiation associated genes and was

    proved to be most important protein and known to play significant role in mineralization

    and osteogenic differentiation.

    Osteoblasts synthesize the macromolecules of the bone matrix including collagen

    type I; osteocalcin; osteonectin; osteopontin; proteoglycan I and II; bone sialoprotein;

    matrix gla-protein; bone glycoprotein 75; several other proteins (Rodin and Noda, 1991).

    Osteoblasts also have high levels of the membrane-bound enzyme, alkaline phosphatase

    (ALP), which plays a role in matrix mineralization, and receptors for tissue-specific

    hormones, such as parathyroid hormone, as well as many other hormones, cytokines and

  • 81

    growth factors, which regulate bone growth, differentiation and metabolism. The

    expression of these various proteins, most of which are not unique to bone but which

    together characterize the bone phenotype, is induced during osteoblastic differentiation in

    a stepwise fashion, suggestive of multiple regulatory factors. ALP is a multifunctional

    enzyme which hydrolyses phosphate substrate releasing inorganic phosphate which binds

    with calcium forming hydroxyapatite which constitute the bone mineral (Oromo and

    Shimada, 2008; Balcerzak et al., 2003). The peak in ALP activity is generally coincides

    with the initiation of mineralization (Lian and Stein, 1995). We observed a rapid increase

    in the ALP activity from day 7 to 14 of osteogenic induction and apparent mineralization

    on all the ECM treated as well as the untreated plates. The significant role of the ALP

    gene (ALPL) in initiating and enhancing mineralization was also evident from our

    studies. Relative ALPL gene expression at early stage of differentiation was highest on

    collagen type I, fibronectin and vitronectin treated plates, which showed early onset of

    mineralization and increased bone matrix secretion. High ALP expression on collagen

    type I, fibronectin and vitronectin treated plate was evident from early phase staining for

    ALP. On the contrary, laminin treated plate did not enhance mineralization and bone

    matrix secretion which was also evidently shown by unaltered ALPL gene expression.

    This underscores the ALPL associated enhancement of mineralization by the ECM

    proteins. It appears that collagen type I and alkaline phosphatase are expressed early

    during the commitment to the osteoblastic phenotype (Rodan and Noda, 1991). Our

    results also showed that increase in ALPL gene expression at early stage of

    differentiation is critical in mineralization and bone matrix secretion, whereas osteopontin

    and osteocalcin appears late during osteoblast differentiation and that could be enhanced

    with the support of appropriate ECM microenvironment. In our study, we have shown

    that collagen type 1, Fibronectin and vitronectin may provide appropriate ECM

  • 82

    microenvironment for osteoblast differentiation. However, the significant fold differences

    observed in the ALPL gene expression on the ECM treated plates with respect to the

    untreated plate, were not reflected in the ALP activity on these plates. Studies by Gong

    and Wezeman (2004) also supported this discrepancy observed in the ALP expression at

    the gene and protein level.

    Among the ECM proteins that we have tested in this experiment, collagen type-I

    was found to be the most appropriate ECM that regulated maximum gene expressions at

    different stages of maturation of osteogenic differentiation. The gene expression profile

    on collagen type I treated plate showed significantly high expression of RUNX2,

    COL1A1, OPN, ALPL, IBSP and OCN at different stages of osteoblast maturation.

    Recently, several critical transcription factors involved in the process of differentiation in

    MSC derived lineages have been identified. Osteogenesis of MSC involves RUNX2,

    which enhance expression of osteogenic genes (Ducy et al., 1997; Nakashima et al.,

    2002).

    There are two types of proteins in bone extracellular matrix: the collagens, mostly

    type I collagen, which account for 90% of the bone matrix proteins and the non-

    collagenous proteins, including osteocalcin and bone sialoprotein (Gehron-Robey, 1996).

    OCN is the major non-collagenous protein component of bone extracellular matrix,

    synthesized and secreted exclusively by osteoblastic cells in the late stage of maturation,

    and is considered as the late stage indicator of osteoblasts differentiation; whereas, IBSP

    and OPN are considered as early markers of bone matrix synthesis (Denhardt et al., 1993;

    Bianco et al., 1991; Hauschka, et al., 1989). IBSP acts as a nucleation point for

    hydroxyapatite and thereby initiating mineral deposition (Ganss et al., 1999). OPN is also

    associated with initiation of mineralization (Roach, 1994). RUNX2 is the first

    transcription factor required for commitment of the MSCs to osteoblast lineage (Komori,

  • 83

    2010). Therefore, it is evident that a relatively higher expression of these genes and high

    ALP activity in the early phase of osteoblast differentiation contributed to the early onset

    of mineralization on collagen type I treated plate. Significant increase in the expression of

    OCN and OSX in the later phase of osteoblast differentiation enhanced the bone matrix

    deposition on these plates. So, enhanced hMSC proliferation and osteoblast

    differentiation by collagen type I implies faster and better bone healing. Although most of

    the osteoblast differentiation associated genes got up-regulated on collagen type I plate

    with respect to the untreated plate, no significant change was observed for calcium in the

    secreted mineral matrix.

    The quality of the bone is very important in bone replacement or regenerative

    therapies as it is the main determinant of the bone strength. Bone matrix is composed of

    organic phase consisting of mainly collagen type I providing the toughness and inorganic

    phase consisting of calcium giving the stiffness to bone (Viguet-Carrin et al., 2006).

    Therefore, it is important to quantify the calcium content of the secreted mineral matrix

    for evaluating the osteogenic potential of a chemical or polymer. The highest amount of

    calcium was present in the mineral matrix on vitronectin treated plate. Though vitronectin

    treated plate showed significant ALPL and IBSP gene expression, it was remarkably

    lower than the up-regulation of these genes observed on collagen type I treated plate.

    OCN and OSX that showed significant expression on collagen type I and fibronectin

    treated plates also did not show much change on these plates. These findings suggest that

    vitronectin enhanced bone matrix synthesis and calcium deposition by a different

    mechanism.

    Previous studies showed an integrin mediated regulation of osteoblast

    differentiation by osteoblast-committed cells (Gronthos et al., 1997). Difference in the

    integrin binding and subsequent signal transduction could be responsible for the observed

  • 84

    difference in the mineralization on different ECM protein treated plate. ECM proteins

    regulate osteoblast differentiation mainly through integrin mediated signal transduction

    by ERK/ MAPK pathway. Osteoblasts express the integrins like α1β1, α2β1, α3β1, α4β1,

    α5β1, αvβ3 and αvβ5 (Gronthos et al., 1997). ECM proteins like collagen type I can

    interacts with α1β1, α2β1, α3β1 and αvβ3; fibronectin interacts with α2β1, α3β1, α4β1

    and α5β1; laminin interacts with α1β1, α2β1, α3β1 and αvβ5 and vitronectin interacts

    with αvβ3 and αvβ5 (Kim et al., 2008). The integrin expression on the cell can vary

    depending on the culture conditions and contacting surfaces (Sinha and Tuan, 1996).

    Studies by Gronthos et al. (2001) showed that monoclonal antibody against β1 affected

    the cell binding to collagen type I, fibronectin and laminin but not vitronectin. In contrast,

    inhibition of αvβ3 did not affect binding to collagen type I, fibronectin and laminin but

    vitronectin was affected. In addition, Kundu and Putnam (2006) reported that vitronectin

    and collagen type I regulated osteoblast differentiation of hMSCs by two different

    mechanisms. They suggested that vitronectin stimulated FAK (focal adhesion kinase)

    activation, which induced osteogenesis possibly by influencing the activity of RhoA. By

    contrast cells on collagen type I reduced the activation of FAK and increased the

    activation of ERK and P13K. ERK induced osteogenesis by the activation of RUNX2.

    There was significantly higher expression level of the collagen type I receptor α2β1 than

    vitronectin receptor αvβ3 by hMSCs. This finding supports the enhanced cell adhesion

    and proliferation and subsequent early mineralization observed on collagen type I treated

    plate. In a similar study, Salasznyk et al. (2004) also reported that adhesion of hMSCs to

    collagen type I and vitronectin promoted osteoblast differentiation better than other ECM

    proteins. They also found higher mineral to matrix ratio and calcium deposition on

    vitronectin treated plate than collagen type I treated plates.

  • 85

    Laminin promoted hMSC adhesion and proliferation, but it failed to improve

    osteoblast differentiation. Although there was normal ALP activity, high IBSP and OSX

    gene expression, there was significantly reduced levels other osteoblast differentiation

    associated genes on laminin treated plate. This resulted in remarkably low mineral matrix

    deposition and significantly low calcium content on these plates. Klees et al. (2005) also

    reported similar observations on laminin treated plates. In their study, laminin enhanced

    MSC adhesion and on osteogenic induction showed high ALP activity, OCN, IBSP, and

    RUNX2 but did not improve the levels of calcium. One possible reason for the low

    osteogenesis on laminin may be due the diminished expression of α6β1 and absence of

    α3β1, the two important laminin binding integrins, on osteoblasts (Kundu and Putnam,

    2006). The consequential low ALPL expression could be responsible for the low

    mineralization on laminin treated plates. The osteoblast differentiation profile of laminin

    also states that enhanced cell adhesion and proliferation need not improve differentiation

    always.

    We identified Alizarin Red S staining a good indicator for detecting early onset

    and comparison of mineralization. Since, von Kossa gave a positive staining only towards

    the final phase of mineralization, it served as a confirmatory test for matrix maturation.

    We also noted that though both these staining methods are used for detecting calcium in

    the mineral matrix, they did not give a real picture of calcium. The calcium quantification

    data showed significantly different amount of calcium on plates, which showed similar

    intensity of staining and vice versa. Based on these findings we emphasise the importance

    of quantifying calcium in the secreted mineral matrix, which indicates the quality and

    strength of the newly formed bone.

    In conclusion, we demonstrated improved hMSC adhesion and proliferation on

    collagen type I treated plates. We have successfully demonstrated the enhancement of

  • 86

    osteoblast differentiation and mineralization on ECM protein treated plates like collagen

    type I, vitronectin and fibronectin. Relative up-regulation of ALPL gene expression was

    observed on these plates, which thus suggested an ALPL mediated enhancement of

    mineralization. Our results underscore the relevance of quantifying calcium in the

    secreted matrix, which indicated the bone strength. We recommend, collagen type I for

    faster and effective bone healing. Vitronectin, which can form ideal bone, could be

    employed for the surface modification of biomaterials or implants to enhance

    mineralization. Our findings could be helpful in designing biomimetic ECM protein

    based biomaterial for bone tissue engineering applications.