subject headings & classification or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people...

17
Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Upload: branden-mcgee

Post on 31-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

IDS4

930:

5 F

ebru

ary

2013Subject Headings &

ClassificationOr, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people

Page 2: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Phot

o cr

edit:

And

y W

oo (h

ttp:

//w

ww

.flic

kr.c

om/p

hoto

s/w

ooan

dy/)

Red

istrib

uted

und

er C

reati

ve C

omm

ons

Attrib

ution

-Non

Com

mer

cial

-Sh

areA

like

2.0

Gen

eric

Lic

ense

Got collections?

Page 3: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Phot

o cr

edit:

sin

desi

gn (h

ttp:

//w

ww

.flic

kr.c

om/p

hoto

s/si

ndes

ign/

) Re

dist

ribut

ed u

nder

Cre

ative

Com

mo

ns A

ttrib

ution

-Sha

reAl

ike

2.0

Gen

eric

lice

nse

At some point, a system is needed…

Page 4: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Subject Headings

“The LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings) were created by thousands of catalogers over the course of 100 years using a strict set of ever-changing rules.”

-- Heidi Lee HoermanSchool of Library and Information Science,U. of South Carolina.

http://bit.ly/YR02My

Page 5: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Subject Headings• Can be• Ideas/concepts• Events• Places (even imaginary ones)• People (even imaginary ones)

Page 6: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Narrowing It Down• Subdivisions can be• Geographic (United States, Florida, etc.)• Chronology (dates; these are NOT the same for all headings)• Form (what kind of a thing it is: Periodicals, Dictionaries, Blogs,

etc.)• Topic (Religious aspects, economic aspects)

Page 7: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Imag

e so

urce

: htt

p://

pixa

bay.

com

/en

/use

rs/H

ans/

(Pub

lic d

omai

n im

age)

What is This?

Page 8: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

LCSH

sug

gesti

ons

cour

tesy

of C

hris

toph

er W

alke

r, Th

e Pe

nnsy

lvan

ia S

tat

e U

nive

rsity

Why???

Parsnip, but also Philodrendrons!Working class women was established about 1985, Working class men in 2005!Neighbors was not a subject heading until 2006Mosquito nets was not a subject heading until 2008 – and this term was requested and created by a cataloger at UF. Often, but NOT always, scientific names are used for plants and animals. If your research involves the sciences, use the authority file to find the correct LCSH. It will save much trouble.

Page 9: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

LCSH

sug

gesti

on c

ourt

esy

of K

evin

Fu

rnis

s, T

ulan

e U

nive

rsity

And some are just … odd…

Page 10: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Library of Congress Classification

Get the big picture:

http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/lcco/

Page 11: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Clip

art

sou

rce:

Mic

roso

ft

So What Do You Do?• Search keywords, but

then look at the whole record and click the subject heading that matches your idea• Check your subject or

name at http://authorities.loc.gov

Page 12: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Yes, We Have Fiction in West!• Not the same amount or kind as the public library, but we do.

Here are some of the secret tips:• Authors are sorted by nationality and/or language; British authors

and American authors are in different classes. • You can often find criticism of important books near that book, or

near the end of all books by the author. • Look around. You may discover authors who were popular in your

parents’, grandparents’, or great-grandparents’ time, but have fallen out of favor.

Page 13: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Some Numbers: American AuthorsDashiell Hammett: PS3515.A4347Shirley Jackson: PS3519.A392James Weldon Johnson: PS3519.O2625-----Mary Higgins Clark: PS3553.L287Stephen King: PS3561.I483 Barbara Kingsolver: PS3561.I496Amy Tan: PS3570.A48

Page 14: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Some Numbers: British Authors• Agatha Christie: PR6005.H66• Mary Renault: PR6035.E55• J.R.R. Tolkien: PR6039.O32• Evelyn Waugh: PR6045.A9• P.G. Wodehouse: PR6045.O53• ------• Douglas Adams: PR6051.D3352• Ian Fleming: PR6056.L4• P.D. James: PR6060.A467

Page 15: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Cove

r im

age

sour

ce: G

oodr

eads

PZ

We also have the PZ call number for many items.

Page 16: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Clip

art

sou

rce:

Mic

roso

ft

Click icon to add picture

Page 17: Subject Headings & Classification Or, why catalogers don’t seem to think like normal people IDS4930: 5 February 2013

Please Ask!

Naomi YoungPrincipal Serials [email protected]

See a mistake in the UF or union catalog? (Typos, the wrong contents note, something obvious like that? )[email protected]