subjective taste and smell changes in treatment-naive patients … · 2018. 8. 15. · •witnessed...

23
Lorraine Spotten Supervisors: Prof. Declan Walsh, MSc, FACP, FRCP (Edin) Dr. Clare Corish, PhD, MINDI November 2015 Subjective Taste and Smell Changes in Treatment-Naive Patients with Solid Tumours 1

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Lorraine Spotten

    Supervisors:

    Prof. Declan Walsh, MSc, FACP, FRCP (Edin)

    Dr. Clare Corish, PhD, MINDI

    November 2015

    Subjective Taste and Smell Changes

    in Treatment-Naive Patients

    with Solid Tumours

    1

  • Taste and Smell Changes (TSCs)

    Frequent in cancer (1,2)

    Mostly studied (3,4,5):

    May occur pre-treatment in diverse cancer sites (6,7,8)

    Mechanisms poorly understood (9)

    May be part of a symptom cluster (10)

    Can affect nutritional status (11)

    2

    Image sources:

    http://isis-innovation.com/licence-details/companion-diagnostic-for-chemotherapy-side-effects/

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/225689/Radiotherapy-can-save-thousands

    http://oncolex.org/head-and-neck-cancer

  • Aims and Objectives

    3

    AIM:

    Examine prevalence, severity and characteristics of TSCs

    Non-H&N patients with solid tumours pre-CT or RT

    OBJECTIVES:

    To investigate the association between:

    Tumour type and TSCs

    Demographics and TSCs

    TSCs and nutritional risk

    TSCs and other nutrition impact symptoms

  • Methodology

    Radiation oncology OPD

    • N=40

    • 6 weeks Image source: http://www.simext.com/images/methodology.png

    4

    Inclusion Exclusion

    • Diagnosis of cancer

    • May have had surgery

    • Age ≥ 18 years old

    • Able to understand and speak

    English

    • Witnessed signed consent form

    • Previous chemotherapy

    • Previous radiotherapy

    • Head and neck cancer

    • ECOG performance status ≥4

    • Life expectancy

  • Methodology

    • Taste and smell survey (12)

    • Abridged Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (13)

    • Measured Body Mass Index

    • Demographic data

    • Data Analysis: SPSS®, Version 22.0

    Image source: http://www.simext.com/images/methodology.png

    5

    12. Modified from Heald et al., 1998

  • Overview of Recruitment Process

    Total screened for eligibility:

    96

    Eligible:

    52

    Agreed to meet with researcher:

    40

    Completed study:

    40

    6

  • Key Baseline Sample Characteristics

    7

    70% Newly Diagnosed

    (n = 28)

    58%

    Male (n=23)

    55% overweight/obese

    (n=32)

    38%

    breast cancer (n=15)

    Median age: 66

    (IQR 55-74) 38%

    prostate cancer

    (n=15)

  • Key Baseline Sample Characteristics

    8

    70% Newly Diagnosed

    (n = 28)

    58%

    Male (n=23)

    55% overweight/obese

    (n=32)

    38%

    breast cancer (n=15)

    Median age: 66

    (IQR 55-74) 38%

    prostate cancer

    (n=15)

  • Key Baseline Sample Characteristics

    9

    70% Newly Diagnosed

    (n = 28)

    58%

    Male (n=23)

    55% overweight/obese

    (n=32)

    38%

    breast cancer (n=15)

    Median age: 66

    (IQR 55-74) 38%

    prostate cancer

    (n=15)

  • Main Findings

    10

    1. Prevalence of TSCs

    48% (n=19)

    Moderate or severe (n=11)

    Mainly:

    Females (n=11/17)

    Breast cancer (n=9/15)

    Image source: https://sciencebasedlife.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/0008db75-22f1-1cbf-b4a8809ec588eedf_1.gif

  • 11

    2. Characteristics of TSCs

    Intensity:

    No change (60%, n=24)

    Stronger sweet taste (n=9)

    Stronger salty taste (n=7)

    Of these:

    Stronger odour (n=4)

    Weaker odour (n=4)

    Quality:

    ‘Bad taste’ (n=22)

    Sour (n=7)

    3. TSCs and Nutritional Risk

    Patients at nutritional risk

    tended to have TSCs

    (P=0.057)

    93% due CT/RT (n=37)

    Image sources:

    http://www.goddessofthegarden.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/lemon1.jpg

    http://anymanfitness.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/weight-scale-help.jpg

  • TSCs and Cluster Symptoms

    TSCs commonly co-occurred with :

    Dry mouth (n=14/17, P

  • TSC and Cluster Symptoms

    TSCs commonly co-occurred with :

    Dry mouth (n=14/17, P

  • TSC and Cluster Symptoms

    TSCs commonly co-occurred with :

    Dry mouth (n=14/17, P

  • TSC and Cluster Symptoms

    TSCs commonly co-occurred with :

    Dry mouth (n=14/17, P

  • TSC and Cluster Symptoms

    TSCs commonly co-occurred with :

    Dry mouth (n=14/17, P

  • Strengths and Limitations

    Novel

    Generalisable

    Statistical significance,

    despite small sample

    Questionnaires (14,15)

    100% completion rate

    upon meeting with

    researcher

    Convenience sampling

    Performance status

    Interview bias

    Confounders

    Missing data on

    medications

    17

    Image sources:

    http://www.bigstockphoto.com/image-1516141/stock-photo-tick-sign

    http://www.clker.com/clipart-3584.html

  • Study Implications

    CLINICAL

    Routine screening at

    diagnosis

    Cluster symptoms

    Use of common

    terminology

    Clinical guidelines

    Individualised care

    Treatments

    RESEARCH

    Longitudinal assessment

    Validation of ‘Taste and

    Smell Survey’ (12)

    Pathophysiology and

    characteristics

    Dietary intake data

    Symptom clusters

    18

    Image sources:

    http://pmclinical.com/

    http://lod-lam.slis.kent.edu/RESEARCH.html

  • Conclusions

    1. TSCs in almost half of treatment-naive cancer patients

    2. May be tumour-induced

    3. Mainly reported by females and breast cancer patients

    4. Majority at nutritional risk reported TSCs

    5. TSCs significantly associated with:

    Dry Mouth

    Early Satiety

    Fatigue

    6. Further research and clinical guidelines needed

    19 Image source: http://pixshark.com/conclusion-paragraph-clipart.htm

  • Acknowledgements Prof. Declan Walsh

    Dr. Clare Corish

    Dr. Cliona Lorton

    Dr. Niamh O’Donoghue

    Ms. Pauline Ui Dhuibhir

    Dr. Brenda O’Connor

    Dr. Moya Cunningham

    Dr. Nazmy El Beltagi

    Dr. Charles Gillham

    .....and all the staff at Our Lady’s Hospice, St. James’s Hospital and St. Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network for their kindness and support throughout.

    20 Image source: http://matthewlpowers.com/tag/thank-you/

  • Thank you for listening

    21 Image source: http://godlessmom.com/10-questions-i-have-never-been-asked-about-atheism-

    answered/question-mark-red-3d-glossy/

  • References

    22

    1. DeWys, WD. and Walters, K. Abnormalities of taste sensation in cancer patients. Cancer, 1975, 36(5), pp.1888-

    1896.

    2. Kamath, S., Booth, P., Lad, T.E., Kohrs, M.B., McGuire, W.P. Taste thresholds of patients with cancer of the

    esophagus. Cancer, 1983, 52(2), pp.386-389.

    3. Zabernigg, A., Gamper, E.M., Giesinger, J.M., Rumpold, G., Kemmler, G., Gattringer, K., et al. Taste

    alterations in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a neglected side effect? Oncologist, 2010, 15, pp.913-920.

    4. Baharvand, M., Shoaleh Saadi, N., Barakian, R., Moghaddam, E.J. Taste alteration and impact on quality of life

    after head and neck radiotherapy. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine, 2013, 42, pp.106-112.

    5. Leyrer, C.M., Chan, M.D., Peiffer, A.M., Horne, E., Harmon, M., Carter, A.F., et al. Taste and smell

    disturbances after brain irradiation: a dose-volume histogram analysis of a prospective observational study.

    Practical Radiation Oncology, 2014, 4, pp.130-135.

    6. Williams, L.R. and Cohen, M.H. Altered taste thresholds in lung cancer. American Journal of Clinical

    Nutrition,1978, 31(1), pp.122-125.

    7. Harris, A.M., Griffin, S.M. Postoperative taste and smell deficit after upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery--an

    unreported complication. Jounal of Surgical Oncology, 2003, 82(3), pp.147-150.

    8. Steinbach, S., Hundt, W., Zahnert, T., Berktold, S., Böhner, C., Gottschalk, N., et al. Gustatory and olfactory

    function in breast cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2010, 18(6), pp.707-713.

    9. Hutton, J.L., Baracos, V.E., Wismer, W.V. Chemosensory dysfunction is a primary factor in the evolution of

    declining nutritional status and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom

    Management, 2007, 33, pp.156-165.

  • 23

    10. Walsh, D. and Rybicki, L. Symptom clustering in advanced cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2006, 14,

    pp.831-836.

    11. Aapro, M., Arends, J., Bozzetti, F., Fearon, K., Grunberg, S.M., et al. Early recognition of malnutrition

    and cachexia in the cancer patient: a position paper of a European School of Oncology Task Force. Annals of

    Oncology, 2014, 25, pp.1492-1499.

    12. Heald, A.E., Pieper, C.F., Schiffman, S.S. Taste and smell complaints in HIV-infected patients. AIDS, 1998,

    12, pp.1667-1674.

    13. Gabrielson, D.K., Scaffidi, D., Leung, E., Stoyanoff, L., Robinson, J., Nisenbaum, R., et al. Use of an

    abridged scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (abPG-SGA) as a nutritional screening tool

    for cancer patients in an outpatient setting. Nutrition and Cancer, 2013, 65, pp.234-239.

    14. McGreevy, J., Orrevall, Y., Belqaid, K., Wismer, W., Tishelman, C., Bernhardson, B.M. Characteristics of

    taste and smell alterations reported by patients after starting treatment for lung cancer. Supportive Care in

    Cancer, 2014, 22, pp.2635-2644.

    15. Belqaid, K., Orrevall, Y., McGreevy, J., Månsson-Brahme, E., Wismer, W., Tishelman, C., et al. Self-

    reported taste and smell alterations in patients under investigation for lung cancer. Acta Oncologica, 2014, 53,

    pp.1405-1412.