successful empirical research in software testing with ......• case study • survey • interview...

8
Successful empirical research in Software Testing with industry Co-chair: Nelly Condori-Fernandez Universidad Politecnica de Valencia http://www.pros.upv.es/fittest/ Funded by the European Commission under Grant Agreement: FP7-ICT-257574

Upload: others

Post on 08-Mar-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Successful empirical research in Software Testing with ......• Case Study • Survey • Interview • Action Research Dag I. K. Sjoberg, Tore Dyba, Magne Jorgensen, The Future of

Successful empirical research in Software Testing with industry

Co-chair: Nelly Condori-Fernandez Universidad Politecnica de Valencia

http://www.pros.upv.es/fittest/

Funded by the European Commission under Grant Agreement: FP7-ICT-257574

Page 2: Successful empirical research in Software Testing with ......• Case Study • Survey • Interview • Action Research Dag I. K. Sjoberg, Tore Dyba, Magne Jorgensen, The Future of

2

Industry

Introduction •  To facilitate the transference of

the research results to industrial applications

Page 3: Successful empirical research in Software Testing with ......• Case Study • Survey • Interview • Action Research Dag I. K. Sjoberg, Tore Dyba, Magne Jorgensen, The Future of

Empirical software engineering •  To facilitate the transference of the research results to

industrial applications

3

Most empirical research methods

•  Experiment •  Case Study •  Survey •  Interview •  Action Research

Dag I. K. Sjoberg, Tore Dyba, Magne Jorgensen, The Future of Empirical Methods in Software Engineering Research, 2007

Limitations •  Lack of realism •  Generalizability of the results.

Page 4: Successful empirical research in Software Testing with ......• Case Study • Survey • Interview • Action Research Dag I. K. Sjoberg, Tore Dyba, Magne Jorgensen, The Future of

•  Technology transfer

4

•  Collaborative research

Industry

Introduction

Page 5: Successful empirical research in Software Testing with ......• Case Study • Survey • Interview • Action Research Dag I. K. Sjoberg, Tore Dyba, Magne Jorgensen, The Future of

5

ACADEMY INDUSTRY

Page 6: Successful empirical research in Software Testing with ......• Case Study • Survey • Interview • Action Research Dag I. K. Sjoberg, Tore Dyba, Magne Jorgensen, The Future of

Panel members

Industry 1) Ricardo Baeza Yates, Yahoo 2) Ywan van der Kleijn, Encamina

Academy 1) Maria Jose Scalona Universidad de Sevilla 2) Tanja Vos Universidad Politecnica de Valencia

3) Maximiliano Mannise, ITI

Page 7: Successful empirical research in Software Testing with ......• Case Study • Survey • Interview • Action Research Dag I. K. Sjoberg, Tore Dyba, Magne Jorgensen, The Future of

Questions Round Industrial  perspec1ve       Academic  perspec1ve

1. What  are  the  current  challenges  you  are  facing  during  your  current  so3ware  tes5ng  processes? How  are  you  searching  for  ways  to  overcome  these  challenges?    

Does  so3ware  tes5ng  research  address  the  real  issues  arising  in  prac5ce?  (If  yes,  what  are  these  real  issues.  If  no,  why  not?)

2. What  obstacles  did  you  perceive  to  adopt  any  so3ware  tes5ng  research  results  into  prac5ce?

What  obstacles  did  you  encounter  when  evaluate  tes5ng  tools?

3. What  did  you  do  to  overcome  these  obstacles?  And  what  do  you  think  academia  should  do  to  overcome  these  obstacles?

What  did  you  do  to  overcome  these  obstacles?  And  what  do  you  think  industry  should  do  to  overcome  these  obstacles?

4. How  could  the  tes5ng  prac55oners  reach  the  so3ware  tes5ng  research  community?

How  could  the  so3ware  tes5ng  research  community  reach  tes5ng  prac55oners?

Page 8: Successful empirical research in Software Testing with ......• Case Study • Survey • Interview • Action Research Dag I. K. Sjoberg, Tore Dyba, Magne Jorgensen, The Future of

Instructions

•  For each round: ▫  Panelists respond formulated questions-> 3 minutes ▫  Audience will be able to formulate questions-> 5 minutes

•  Fifth round- Conclusions ▫  For each panelist -> 2 minutes