suit partion

Upload: hakimmohdyousif

Post on 30-May-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Suit Partion

    1/7

    In the court of Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate2

    Tando Mohd Khan

    Civil suit No of 2009

    Iqbal Ahammed s/o Muzaffer Ali buriro

    r/o Burira Mohalla near phuleli

    pull Tando Mohd khan ------------------------------------------Plaintiff

    Versus

    1 Manzoor Ahammed s/o Muzaffer Ali

    2 Nazeer Ahammed s/o Muzzafer Ali

    3 Maqbool Ahammed s/o Muzaffer Ali

    4 Mst manzoor begum w/o Mohd hussain

    5 Isalm khatoon wd/o Muzaffer Ali All

    Resides at burira mohalla near phuleli pull

    Tando Mohd khan---------------------------------------defendants

    Suit for Partition and Per manent injunction

    The above named plaintiff respect fully

    states as follows

    1 That the plaintiff and defendants aremembers of same family and are residing in plots city survey

    no 1447/36, 1447/35 are annexed as annexure no 1 A and 1b

    same will be called here suit property.

    2 That relation between plaintiffs anddefendants is as under

    Defendants no 1to3 are real brother while defendant no 4 is

    real sister and defendant no 5is real mother

    3 That plaintiff and defendants no 1to3are equal entitled 19.5 ps in Suit property annexure no 1A

  • 8/14/2019 Suit Partion

    2/7

    and1B and defendant no 4 is entitled 10 ps and defendant no

    5 is entitled 12 ps in same suit property.

    4 That dispute aroused between plaintiffand defendant no 3 by demolishing the portion which was in

    possession of plaintiff ,defendant no 3 has purchased 3 shops

    there is 30 feet street in between shops and suit property,

    which is shown in map annexed here as annexure no 2

    5 That defendant3 wants to usurps thestreet and wants to add it in his portion and wants to close

    same street, and forcibly has demolished main gate now he

    allots plaintiff zigzag, street from the suit property, while the

    sanctioned door is from the street which he wants to add it in

    his purchased shop.

    6 That plaintiff approached to naik mards and well wisher offamily for amicable partition but defendant no 3 refused and

    is raising construction even in my side which is in mypossession now the joint possession is no longer possible and

    it is beneficial to partition

    7 That defendant no 3 is sub Inspector andis influential person and is purchasing plot from other co

    sharer is issuing threats for purchasing same portion of plot

    of plaintiff .being police officer also has issued threats that he

    will cause to involve me in false criminal cases if plaintiff willnot sell same portion to defendant no3 also he wants me to

    dispossess forcibly and unlawfully.

    8 That first of all cause of action accruedwhen defendant no 3 demolished the main gate and otaque

    which were in joint possession, then he refused to amicable

    partition of disputed property and threatened to dispossess

    which is still continued till to day

    9 That the suit property is situated at TandoMohd Khan , parties are residing in suit property and is not

    agricultural land hence this honorable court has jurisdiction

    to entertain the suit

  • 8/14/2019 Suit Partion

    3/7

    10 That the suit is valued one thousand andfor permanent injunction is valued at Rs:400 hundred There

    fore court fee is not required.

    11 That the plaintiff prays for judgment anddecree as under

    (a) Partition of the suit property according to

    share of parties to words main street

    (b) To direct city surveyor to effect the partition by mutes

    and bounds

    (c ) To grant permanent injuction to defendant no 3not to

    dispossess plaintiff and may be refrained not to raise any

    construction till the partition

    (d) costs of suit may be awarded to plaintiff

    (e) Any other relief which this honourable court may deem fit

    and proper may be awarded to plaintiff

    Tando Mohd khanDated Plaintiff

    Verification

    I Iqbal Ahommed s/o Muzafffer Ali adult muslim by cast buriro

    r/o burira mohalla near phuleli pull Tando Mohd khan present

    at Tando Mohd khan do here by veri fy the contents of plaint

    on oath to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge

    and belief

    Tando Mohd khan

    Dated plaintiff

    Identified by me

    Advocate

  • 8/14/2019 Suit Partion

    4/7

    Documents filed

    1 photo copy of plot no 1947/36

    2 photo copy of plot no 1947/35

    3 Photo copy of map of plots

    Note

    Address of the defendants for the purpose of service is same

    as shown in the title of plaint

  • 8/14/2019 Suit Partion

    5/7

    In the court of F.C.M& civil JudgeTando Mohd khan

    Civil suit No of 2009

    Iqbal Ahammed--------------------- ---------------------------Plaintiff

    Versus

    Maqbool Ahammedand others.Defendants

    List of legal heirs of plaintiff

    1 Najma w/o Iqbal Ahammed2 Shoaib Ahammed s/o =3 Shaoor Ahammed s/o =4 Danish s/o =

    Tando Mohd khan

    Dated ADVOCATE OF PLAINTIFF

  • 8/14/2019 Suit Partion

    6/7

    In the court of F.C.M& civil Judge Tando Mohd Khan

    Civil suit No of 2009

    Iqbal Ahammed ----------------------------------------------Plaintiff

    Versus

    Maqbool Ahammedand others.Defendants

    Appliccation u/o 39 Rule 1& 2 CPC

    Read with Section 151 C.P.C

    It is prayed that this honourable court would

    be be pleased to grant ad interim injunction restring the defendant

    no 3 from interfering the peaceful possession of plaintiff in suit

    property and may be directed not to dispossess plaintiff from suit

    property illegally forcibly on the consideration of the following

    grounds

    1 That plaintiff is in physical possession of suit

    property, and has constructed room in suit property and living with

    family.

    2 That defendant no 3 has no legal .lawful ,

    moral or equitable right to dispossess the plaintiff from suit property

    3 That plaintiff has a prima facie suit to succeed

    4 That balance of connivance lies in favour of Plaintiff

    5 That if the plaintiff was dispossessed has not any

    alternate to live along with family to some other place will cause

    serious injury to reputation that will be irreparable loss.

    5 that the plaintiff will suffer an irreparable loss and

    legal injury in case the interim injunction is not granted to the

    plaintiff.

    That the prayer is made in the interest of justice

    Tando Mohd khan

    Dated ADVOCATE OF PLAINTIFF

  • 8/14/2019 Suit Partion

    7/7

    In the court of F.C.M& civil Judge Tando Mohd Khan.

    Civil suit No of 2009

    Iqbal Ahammed ---------------------------Plaintiff

    Versus

    Maqbool Ahammed and others.Defendants

    AFFIDAVIT

    I Iqbal Ahammed s/o Muzaffer Ali adult muslim

    by cast buriro r/o burira mohalla near Phuleli pull Tando Mohd khan

    do here by state on solemn affirmation as under

    1 That I am the plaintiff in above suit and as such

    well conversant with the facts of the suit

    2 That the accompanying application under order

    39 Rule 1&2 C.P.C has been drafted and moved under my instruction

    3 That the contents of the accompanying application

    be read and treat as part and parcel of this affidavit

    That what ever is stated above is true and

    correct to the best of my knowledge and belief

    Tando Mohd khan

    Dated Deponent

    I know the deponent

    Advocate