summary of 2014 i3 highest-rated applications (hras) type of grant hra absolute priorities and...

4
Summary of 2014 i3 Highest-Rated Applications (HRAs) Type of Grant HRA Absolute Priorities and Subparts 1 Com petition Count FundsRequested D evelopm ent 21 $61,159,494 Validation 4 $47,946,194 Scale-Up 1 $20,000,000 G rand Total 26 $129,105,688 Priority Title w ith Subpart D evelopm ent Count Validation Count Scale-Up C ount Percent ELs– EarlyLearning 1 N /A N /A 4% ELs– N ew instructional tools/content 3 N /A N /A 12% Im plem enting InternationallyBenchm arked Standards N /A 2 8% Im proving Academ icO utcom esforStudentsw ith D isabilities 3 N /A 12% Low -Perform ing– N on-cognitive 2 N /A N /A 8% Low -Perform ing– O rg. D esign/differentiated roles 2 N /A N /A 8% Rural; Im proving Academ icO utcom esforStudentsw ith D isabilities 1 N /A 4% Rural; TeachersorPrincipals N /A N /A 1 4% Rural; Teachers/Principals– EquitableAccess 1 N /A N /A 4% Rural; Technology– Integration into College-and Career-Ready 1 N /A N /A 4% Teachers/Principals– EquitableAccess 2 N /A N /A 8% Teachers/Principals--Principal M odels 1 N /A N /A 4% Teachers/Principals--Extending Reach N /A 1 N /A 4% Teachers/Principals--Induction and Support N /A 1 N /A 4% Technology– Accessto personalization 1 N /A N /A 4% Technology– Integration into College-and Career-Ready 3 N /A N /A 12% G rand Total 21 4 1 100%

Upload: kellie-harvey

Post on 24-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Summary of 2014 i3 Highest-Rated Applications (HRAs)

Type of Grant

HRA Absolute Priorities and Subparts

1

Competition Count Funds RequestedDevelopment 21 $61,159,494Validation 4 $47,946,194Scale-Up 1 $20,000,000Grand Total 26 $129,105,688

Priority Title with Subpart Development

CountValidation

CountScale-Up Count

Percent

ELs– Early Learning 1 N/ A N/ A 4%ELs– New instructional tools/ content 3 N/ A N/ A 12%Implementing Internationally Benchmarked Standards N/ A 2 8%Improving Academic Outcomes for Students with Disabilities 3 N/ A 12%Low-Performing– Non-cognitive 2 N/ A N/ A 8%Low-Performing– Org. Design/ differentiated roles 2 N/ A N/ A 8%Rural; Improving Academic Outcomes for Students with Disabilities 1 N/ A 4%Rural; Teachers or Principals N/ A N/ A 1 4%Rural; Teachers/ Principals – Equitable Access 1 N/ A N/ A 4%Rural; Technology– Integration into College- and Career- Ready 1 N/ A N/ A 4%Teachers/ Principals – Equitable Access 2 N/ A N/ A 8%Teachers/ Principals -- Principal Models 1 N/ A N/ A 4%Teachers/ Principals--Extending Reach N/ A 1 N/ A 4%Teachers/ Principals--Induction and Support N/ A 1 N/ A 4%Technology– Access to personalization 1 N/ A N/ A 4%Technology– Integration into College- and Career- Ready 3 N/ A N/ A 12%Grand Total 21 4 1 100%

Highest-Rated Application Data

Competitive Preference Priorities*

*Calculated as a percentage of the total number of highest-rated applications*Applicable to Validation and Scale- Up applications

HRA by Competition and Applicant Type

HRA Absolute Priority Funding

2

Organization Type Development ValidationScale-UpGrand TotalLEA 4 4Nonprofit with consortium of schools 4 1 5Nonprofit with LEA 13 4 17Grand Total 21 4 1 26

Priority %Cost Effectiveness/ Productivity

100%

Adoption of Effective Practices

60%

Novice 60%

Students Served

Total Number of Students Served by Competition and Absolute Priority

Total Number of Students Served by Competition and Applicant Type

3

Priority Development Validation Scale-UpGrand TotalEnglish Language 24,400 N/ A 24,400 Standards N/ A 201,920 201,920 Students w/Disabilities 9,324 9,324 Low- Performing 14,751 N/ A 14,751 Rural 12,422 13,300 25,722 Teachers/Principals 25,327 395,000 420,327 Technology 52,159 N/ A N/ A 52,159 Total 138,383 596,920 13,300 748,603

Organization Type Development Validation Scale-Up Grand TotalLEA 35,519 35,519 Nonprofit with consortium of schools 11,164 13,300 24,464 Nonprofit with LEA 91,700 596,920 688,620 Grand Total 277,483 596,920 13,300 748,603

26 HRAs Across 14 States

4

Competition Organization Applicant State

Development Albemarle County Public Schools VADevelopment American Institutes for Research DCDevelopment Boston Plan for Excellence in the Public Schools Foundation MADevelopment College Possible MNDevelopment Education Development Center, Inc. MADevelopment Erikson Institute ILDevelopment Green River Regional Educational Cooperative KYDevelopment Hillsborough County Public Schools FLDevelopment Montgomery County Schools NCDevelopment Neighborhood Charter School GADevelopment New Classrooms Innovation Partners, Inc. NYDevelopment New Teacher Project, Inc. NYDevelopment Northwest Colorado BOCES CODevelopment SRI International CADevelopment Take Stock in Children, Inc. FLDevelopment The Curators of the University of Missouri MODevelopment The Ohio State University OHDevelopment The University Corporation CADevelopment University Enterprises Corporation at CSUSB CADevelopment Urban Arts Partnership NYDevelopment WestEd CAValidation Higher Achievement Program, Inc. DCValidation Literacy Design Collaborative NYValidation National Institute for School Leadership DCValidation WestEd CAScale-Up North Carolina New Schools NC