summary of analytical protocols used for dye and organic pigment analysis maarten van bommel
TRANSCRIPT
Summary of Analytical protocolsused for
Dye and organic pigment analysis
Maarten van Bommel
Analytical protocols
Evaluation of techniques used
- Not standardization of the techniques
- Determine pro’s and con’s of the different techniques
- Establish a standard format of how to describe an analytical technique
- So that others can reproduce it
All partners submitted the analytical protocols in the format they are used to
Analytical protocols
Non-destructive:- X-ray fluorescence (XRF)- Fibre optic mid-FTIR- Fibre optic micro-Raman UNI-PG- UV-VIS fluorescence- UV-VIS colorimetry
- 3D fluorescence KIK / IRPA- SEM-EDX (samples are coated) ICN
Not comparable equipment, except fluorescence
Analytical protocolsDestructive:- HPLC-PDA (6 protocols)
OADCKIK-IRPANGLICNGCINMS/UoE
- HPLC-MS (2 protocols)GCI (combined with PDA)NMS/UoE
- HPLC-FluorescenceICN (combined with PDA)
Sample pre-treatmentMicroscopic examination
KIK / IRPANGLICN
Weight samplesOADCKIK / IRPANMS / UoEICN (not paint samples)
Colorant extractionMethanolic HCl all partners except NGLMethanolic BF3 NGL
Sample pre-treatment
EvaporationNitrogen flow
OADC (60 °C)ICN
Vacuum desiccatorsKIK / IRPAGCI
Rotary evaporatorNMS / UoE (40 °C)
NoneNGL
Dissolve Methanol / water
KIK / IRPAGCINMS / UoE
Di-methyl formamideOADCICN
Add methanolNGL
Sample pre-treatmentRemoval of particles / precipitationFiltering prior evaporation
GCIKIK / IRPA
Centrifugation after evaporation and dissolutionICN
HPLC analysisAll partners uses RP-HPLC with silica C18 based materials
However, all partners uses different column materials and columns with different dimensions (length and id).As a results, flow rate varies from
0.01 ml/min to 1.20 ml/min
Injection volumes varies as well
Columns are thermo stated at 25 – 40 °C (except KIK / IRPA)
HPLC analysisHPLC solvent composition Runtime (min)H2O / ACN / TFA
OADC 35NGL* 240
H2O / MeOH/ phosphoric acidKIK / IRPA 35NMS / UoE 35ICN 50
H2O / MeOH / formic acidGCI 45
H2O / MeOHNMS / UoE (HPLC-MS) 40
Accuracy of solvent preparation? (ICN and NMS / UoE)
Photo diode array detection (PDA)RangeStart 191, 200, 210 or 250 nmEnd 700, 750 or 800 nm
ResolutionVaries from 1.0 to 2.5 nm
Specific wavelengthsUV250 nm, 254 nm, 255 nm, 270 nm, 275 nm, 288 nm, 290 nmVIS330 nm, 350 nm, 370 nm, 420 nm, 435 nm, 491 nm 495 nm,500 nm, 530 nm, 540 nm and 610 nm
Note: OADC, GCI and NMS focus only on UV
Mass spectrometry (MS)
Only GCI and NMS / UoENegative ESINitrogen sheath gasNo sheath flowInterface 200 °C NMS / UoE
350 °C GCI
Scanning 50 – 1000 m/z GCI? NMS / UoE
Conclusions
Everybody uses different systems, question remains:
- How are the results affected by the different parameters?
- Can we establish a standard format for description ofprotocols for (HPLC) analysis
And do we want that?
Proposed format- Name of protocol
- Aim of protocol
- Author(s)
- Date of latest version or revision
- Chemicals- reagent, grade, concentration, supplier, product number
- Materials- Vials- Columns (and pre-columns)- Filters- Glassware- Pipettes- etc
- Equipment- Pump- Degasser- Autosampler / injector- Column oven- Detector
Proposed format, continue
TypeSpecificationSupplierProduct number?
- Solvent preparation
- Pre-examination
- Sample pre-treatment
- Analysis
- Blank and standards
- Detection parameters
- Data evaluation
Proposed format, continue