summary of topic 3.7
DESCRIPTION
IB Environmental Systems and SocietiesTRANSCRIPT
Topic 3.7
Limits to Growth
Human Population Growth• Carrying Capacity– The maximum number of individuals of a species that
can be sustainably supported within a habitat. It occurs when birth rate is equal to death rate
• But does this really apply to human populations?• Do human populations actually have a carrying
capacity?• Well, there are many examples of direct and
indirect effects of drought, famine and war which act to reduce populations when they grow too large
Human Population Growth• Size of population isn’t the only factor which impacts
on natural resources• Other factors include:– Wealth (MEDC or LEDC)– Resource desire– Resource need (or use)– Age distribution– Rural or urban populations– Time (it is dynamic)
80% of the world’s population lives in MEDCs where birth rate is falling (or negative, e.g.Japan)20% of the world’s population lives in LEDCs where birth rate is increasing
Malthusian Theory
• Malthus believed that human populations grow exponentially, but resources only grow arithmetically (limited by land availability and existing technology)
• Food production can only therefore increase to a certain level
• Above this level, soil erosion and decreasing soil fertility cause productivity to decrease
• A natural check on population occurs
Thomas Malthus
Boserup Theory• An increase in population will simply stimulate
scientists to come up with ideas to increase food production
• “Necessity is the mother of invention”• Productivity has been increased by:
– Reclaiming land from the sea– Selective breeding and cross breeding– Developing high-yield plants – Genetic modification– Terracing– Hydroponics– Greenhouses– Irrigation– Artificial fertilisers– Switching to new crops (e.g. soya)– Fish farming
Ester Boserup
ProblemsMalthusian Theory Boserup Theory
Malthus assumes a ‘closed system’ of human population
Bosrup assumes a ‘closed system’ of human population
The distribution of food resources is not fair and equitable. Only the poor really suffer from lack of food
There are examples where human activities have led to desertification of huge tracts of land
Malthus could not have predicted the amazing changes in technology
In LEDCs, food shortages lead to emigration rather than innovation
Food resource availability has not really increased ‘arithmetically’
Innovation occurs in MEDCs and is not always shared with LEDCs
Malthus did not predict the globalisation of food supply
Perhaps both theories work, but in different ways. Malthus was referring to environmental limits, while Boserup refers to cultural and technological issues
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dN06tLRE4WE
Can Carrying Capacity Change?• If we cut down on our use of natural resources• It may be achieved by:– Recycling (reprocessing materials into new
products)– Re-use (returning materials to the manufacturer of
processor, or finding new uses ourselves)– Reduction (using less energy or resources)– Substitution (switching to renewable resources
from non-renewable)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8dkWQVFAoA
Questions1. Explain why it is difficult to apply the idea of
carrying capacity to a human population2. List and explain ways in which human
behaviour may increase our carrying capacity3. Compare and contrast the Malthusian and
Boserup theories of human population growth