summit 2017aacr draft 31-mar-2017 final - … summit_2017aacr_slides.pdfsummit ‘basket’ study...

25
Neratinib in HER2- or HER3-mutant solid tumors: SUMMIT, a global, multi-histology, open-label, phase 2 ‘basket’ study David M. Hyman, 1 Sarina Piha-Paul, 2 Jordi Rodon, 3 Cristina Saura, 3 Geoffrey I. Shapiro, 4 David I. Quinn, 5 Victor Moreno, 6 Ingrid Mayer, 7 Carlos Arteaga, 7 Valentina Boni, 8 Emiliano Calvo, 8 Sherene Loi, 9 A. Craig Lockhart, 10 Lillian M. Smyth, 1 Joseph Erinjeri, 1 Maurizio Scaltriti, 1 F Javier Carmona, 1 Gary Ulaner, 1 Jean Torrisi, 1 Juber Patel, 1 Jiabin Tang, 1 Fanli Meng, 1 Duygu Selcuklu, 1 Helen Won, 1 Nancy Bouvier, 1 Michael F. Berger, 1 Richard E. Cutler, Jr., 11 Feng Xu, 11 Anna Butturini, 11 Lisa D. Eli, 11 Grace Mann, 11 Cynthia Farrell, 11 Alshad S. Lalani, 11 Richard Bryce, 11 Funda Meric Bernstam, 2 José Baselga, 1 David B. Solit 1 1 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; 2 MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 3 Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; 4 Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 5 USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 6 START Madrid Fundación Jímenez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; 7 Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA; 8 START Madrid Group, Madrid, Spain 9 Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 10 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; 11 Puma Biotechnology Inc, Los Angeles, CA, USA Oral CT001

Upload: hamien

Post on 08-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

NeratinibinHER2- orHER3-mutantsolidtumors:SUMMIT,aglobal,multi-histology,open-label,phase2‘basket’studyDavidM.Hyman,1 SarinaPiha-Paul,2 JordiRodon,3 CristinaSaura,3 GeoffreyI.Shapiro,4 DavidI.Quinn,5VictorMoreno, 6 IngridMayer,7CarlosArteaga,7 ValentinaBoni,8 EmilianoCalvo,8 ShereneLoi,9 A.CraigLockhart,10 LillianM.Smyth,1 JosephErinjeri,1MaurizioScaltriti,1 FJavierCarmona,1 GaryUlaner,1 JeanTorrisi,1 Juber Patel,1 Jiabin Tang,1 Fanli Meng,1 Duygu Selcuklu,1HelenWon,1 NancyBouvier,1MichaelF.Berger,1 RichardE.Cutler,Jr.,11 FengXu,11 AnnaButturini,11 LisaD.Eli,11 GraceMann,11CynthiaFarrell,11Alshad S.Lalani,11 RichardBryce,11 Funda Meric Bernstam,2 JoséBaselga,1 DavidB.Solit1

1MemorialSloanKetteringCancerCenter,NewYork,NY,USA;2MDAndersonCancerCenter,Houston,TX,USA;3Valld’Hebron UniversityHospital,Barcelona,Spain; 4DanaFarberCancerInstitute,Boston,MA,USA;5USCNorrisComprehensiveCancerCenter,LosAngeles,CA,USA;6STARTMadridFundación JímenezDíaz,Madrid,Spain;7Vanderbilt-IngramCancerCenter,Nashville,TN,USA;8STARTMadridGroup,Madrid,Spain 9PeterMacCallumCancerCentre,Melbourne,Victoria,Australia;10WashingtonUniversityinSt.LouisSchoolofMedicine,St.Louis,MO,USA;11PumaBiotechnologyInc,LosAngeles,CA,USA

OralCT001

HER2(ERBB2)mutations• SubsetsofsomaticHER2mutationsareseenatrelativelylowfrequenciesacrossmultipletumortypes

• Activating HER2mutationsresultinconstitutivekinasesignaling,activationofgrowthpromoting/survivalpathways,oncogenictransformationandenhancedtumorgrowthinpreclinicalmodels

2cBioportal.orgaccessedon16March2017

HER2mutations

Activationofdownstreamsignaltransductionpathwaysandtumorgrowthsurvival

P P

NeratinibinHER2-mutant cancer• Neratinibisanoral,irreversiblepan-HERtyrosinekinaseinhibitor• Neratinibleadstopotentinhibitionofintracellularsignaling,cellproliferationandcolonyformation

ofHER2-mutanttumorcelllinesinvitro1,2

• HER2-mutantalleleshavedistinctdifferentialsensitivitytoneratinib

1Boseetal.CancerDiscovery2013:3;224–2372Carmonaetal.CancerRes2016:76(14Suppl);abst 298 3

-3-2-10

0

5 0

1 0 0

H K I-2 7 2 c o n c e n tra t io n (L o g µ M )

Cel

l via

bilit

y (%

)

Neratinib(LogµM)

-3-2-10

0

5 0

1 0 0

H E R 2 V 7 7 7 L

W T

H K I-2 9 2 c o n c e n tra t io n (L o g µ M )

Cel

l via

bilit

y (%

)

H E R 2 L 7 5 5 S

Y V M A in s

D 7 6 9 HI7 6 7 M

Sensitivity

0 –1 –2 –3

100

50

0

Cellviab

ility(%

)

AmplifiedwildtypeD769HI767ML755SV777LYVMAins

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0WT V777L D769H V8421 L755Sdel.755–9 R678Q G309A

Meancolonyco

unt

VehicleLapatinibNeratinib

SUMMIT‘basket’studydesign

4

Solidtumors(NOS)

Endometrial

Gastroesophageal

Ovarian

Colorectal

Bladder/urinary tract

Solidtumors(NOS)

Neratinibmonotherapy

HER2 orHER3mutations(documentedbylocaltesting)

Primaryendpoint• Objectiveresponserateatweek8(ORR8)

Secondaryendpoints• ORR(confirmed)• Clinicalbenefitrate(CBR)• Progression-freesurvival(PFS)• Safety• Biomarkers

Simon2-stagedesign• If≥1responseinfirstevaluable7patients,expandcohorttoStage2(N=18)• If≥4responsesinStage2,expandorbreakout

Tumorassessments• RECISTv1.1(primarycriteria)• PETresponse

Statisticalmethods• ORR8,ORR,CBR:associated95%CI• MedianPFS:Kaplan-Meierestimatewith95%CI

Breast

Cervical

Biliarytract

Lung

Datacut-off:10-Mar-2017NOS=nototherwisespecified

• FFPEtumors(archivalorfreshpre-treatmentbiopsies)retrospectivelysequencedcentrallyusingNGS(MSK-IMPACT)• PlasmacfDNA (pre-treatment)retrospectivelysequencedcentrallyusinga HER2single-genehybridcaptureresearchassay(MSKCC)

HER2-mutanttumors

HER3-mutanttumors Closed

Open

Enrollment

EnrollmentbytumortypeNeratinib monotherapy(n=141)

HER2-mutationpositive

Lungcancer 26(18.4)

Breastcancer 25(17.7)

Bladder/urinarytractcancer 16(11.3)

Solidtumors(NOS) 15(10.6)

Colorectalcancer 12(8.5)

Biliarytractcancer 9(6.4)

Endometrialcancer 7(5.0)

Cervicalcancer 5(3.5)

Gastroesophagealcancer 5(3.5)

Ovariancancer 4(2.8)

HER3-mutationpositive

Solidtumors(NOS) 17(12.1) 5

Baselinedemographics

6

PatientcharacteristicsHER2mutant

(n=124)HER3mutant

(n=17)Total

(n=141)

AgeMedian(range),years<65years,n(%)≥65years,n(%)

61(30–83)81(64.8)43(34.7)

66(39–82)7(43.8)10(58.8)

61(30–83)88(62.4)53(37.6)

Gender,n(%)FemaleMale

79(63.7)45(36.3)

13(76.5)4(23.5)

92(65.2)49(34.8)

ECOGperformance status,n(%)012

36(29.0)83(66.9)5(4.0)

2(11.8)12(75.6)3(17.6)

38(27.0)95(67.4)8(5.7)

Priorsystemiclines,n(%)AnyNone12≥3

120(96.8)4(3.2)

33(26.4)29(23.4)58(46.4)

17(100)0(0)1(6.3)

12(70.6)4(25.0)

137(97.0)4(2.8)

34(24.1)41(29.1)62(44.0)

Mediantimefrommetastasistoenrollment,years(range) 1.02(0.0–15.0) 1.13(0.3–4.5) 1.03(0.0–15.0)

DistributionofHER2mutations

7

DistributionofHER3mutations

8

NoclinicalactivityseeninHER3-mutantcohort

Patientdisposition

9

ParameterHER2mutant

(n=124)HER3mutant

(n=17)Total

(n=141)

Patientscontinuingontreatment,n(%) 10 0 10

Treatmentdiscontinuation,n(%)DeathDiseaseprogressionAdverse eventWithdrawalofconsentInvestigatorrequestLosttofollow-upOther

114(91.9)2(1.6)

88(71.0)5(4.0)4(3.2)5(4.0)1(0.8)9(7.2)

17(100.0)1(5.9)

16(94.1)0(0.0)0(0.0)0(0.0)0(0.0)0(0.0)

131(92.9)3(2.1)

104(73.8)5(3.5)4(2.8)5(3.5)1(0.7)9(6.4)

Subjectsendedstudy,n(%)DeathWithdrawalofconsentLosttofollow-upOther

81(65.3)70(56.5)5(4.0)5(4.0)1(0.8)

15(88.2)12(70.6)2(12.5)1(6.3)0(0.0)

96(68.1)82(58.2)7(5.0)6(4.3)1(0.7)

EfficacyinHER2-mutantpatientsbytumortype

10

EfficacyinHER2-mutantpatientsbytumortype

11

EfficacyinHER2-mutantpatientsbytumortype

12

EfficacyinHER2-mutantpatientsbytumortype

13

EfficacyinHER2-mutantpatientsbytumortype

14

EfficacyinHER2-mutantpatientsbyallele

15

EfficacyinHER2-mutantpatientsbyallele

16

EfficacyinHER2-mutantpatientsbyallele

17

IntegratedefficacybytumortypeandHER2mutation

18

Efficacysummary

19

HER2mut HER3mut

Breast(n=25)

Bladder(n=16)

Lung(n=26)

Colorectal(n=12)

Biliarytract(n=9)

Cervical(n=5)

NOS(n=17)

ORRatweek8,n (%)[95%CI]

8(32.0)[14.9–53.5]

0(0.0)[0.0–20.6]

1(3.8)[0.1–19.6]

0(0.0)[0.0–26.5]

2(22.2)[2.8–60.0]

1(20.0)[0.5–71.6]

0(0.0)[0.0–20.6]

ORR,n(%)[95%CI]

6(24.0)[9.4–45.1]

0(0.0)[0.0–20.6]

1(3.8)[0.1–19.6]

0(0.0)[0.0–26.5]

0(0.0)[0.0–33.6]

1(20.0)[0.5–71.6]

0(0.0)[0.0–20.6]

Clinicalbenefitrate,n(%)[95%CI]

10(40.0)[21.1–61.3]

3(18.8)[4.0–45.6]

11(42.3)[23.4–63.1]

1(8.3)[0.2–38.5]

3(33.3)[7.5–70.1]

3(60.0)[14.7–94.7]

2(11.8)[1.6–38.3]

MedianPFS,months(95%CI)

3.5(1.9–4.3)

1.8(1.7–3.5)

5.5(2.7–10.9)

1.8(1.4–1.9)

2.8(0.5–3.7)

20.1(0.5–NA)

1.7(1.4–2.0)

Incidenceoftreatment-emergentadverseevents(≥10%)Neratinibmonotherapy(N=141)

Adverse event,n(%) Anygrade Grade≥3

Diarrhea 104(73.8) 31(22.0)Nausea 61(43.3) 3(2.1)Vomiting 58(41.1) 3(2.1)Constipation 49(34.8) 2(1.4)Fatigue 45(31.9) 5(3.5)Decreasedappetite 40(28.4) 1(0.7)Abdominalpain 33(23.4) 7(5.0)Anemia 22(15.6) 10(7.1)Dyspnea 18(12.8) 5(3.5)Dehydration 17(12.1) 8(5.7)Aspartateaminotransferaseincreased 15(10.6) 5(3.5)Asthenia 15(10.6) 1(0.7)Weightdecreased 15(10.6) 0 20

Characteristicsofdiarrhea

Adverse event,n(%)Neratinibmonotherapy

(N=141)

Incidenceofdiarrhea,n(%)a

Anygrade 104(73.8)

Grade3 31(22.0)

Actiontakenwithneratinib,n(%)

Permanentdiscontinuation 4(2.8)

Dosereduction 2(1.4)

Temporaryhold 21(14.9)

Seriousdiarrhea(hospitalizedorimportant medicalevent) 15(10.6)

Median(range)numberofgrade3episodesofdiarrhea perpatient 1(1–12)

Median (range)timetofirstgrade3diarrhea,days 10(4–87)

Median(range)durationofgrade3diarrheaperepisode,days 2(1–18)

aNograde4/5diarrheareported 21

AgreementbetweenlocalandcentralassessmentofHER2mutations

1Chengetal.JMol Diagn 2015;17:251–642HER2 single-genehybridcaptureresearch-use-onlyassay(MSKCC)

• >98%concordancewasobservedbetweenlocalandcentralHER2mutationassaysEnrollmentassay(n=124)

Localtest(n=96)

ArchivalFFPEtumor(MSK-IMPACT1)

(n=28)

Centraltesting(retrospective)

ArchivalFFPEtumor(MSK-IMPACT1)

98%(48/49) N/A

ScreeningcfDNA(RUOassay2)

100%(60/60)

100%(20/20)

23

PlasmactDNA attimeofneratinibclinicalprogressionrevealsacquiredHER2 (T798I)gatekeepermutationthatinducesresistance

Hankeretal.AdvancedOnlinePublication;doi:10.1158/2159-8290;CancerDiscovery2017

Progressiononneratinib

Responsetocombination

FULVESTRANTNERATINIB

AROMATASEINHIBITORS

201520142013201220112010

FulvestrantaddedSUMMIT

trial

Chestwallrecurrence

Bonemets

Skinmets

ER+/HER2–diagnosed

12/2014 1/2015

Baselineskinmets

Responsetoneratinib

4/2016 6/2016

SkinmettumorFFPENGS:L869Ractivatingmutation

PlasmactDNA Guardant360T798Igatekeepermutation

PD

2016

Conclusions

24

• Neratinibactivitywasinfluencedbybothtumorlineageandmutationtype:

– Breastcancer:single-agentactivityobserved.Combinationwithfulvestrant inER+diseaseunderway

– Biliarycancerandcervicalcancer:preliminarysingle-agentactivity;enrollmentongoing

– Lungcancer:responseratelowbutpromisingprolongeddiseasestabilizationinheavily-pretreatedpatients

– Colorectalcancerandbladdercancer,andHER3 cohort:insufficientsingle-agentactivity

– Mutationclass:missensemutationsappearmoresensitivecomparedwithexon20insertions,althoughcomparisonpartiallyconfoundedbytumor-lineageassociations

• Single-agentneratinibshowsactivityinsomecohorts;combinationsmaybeneededtoimproveactivityanddurability(similartoHER2-targetedtherapyinHER2-amplifiedtumors)

• NeratinibsafetyprofileconsistentwithpreviousreportsinmetastaticHER2-amplifiedtumors

– Diarrheawasnotatreatment-limitingtoxicitywithanti-diarrhealprophylaxis

Acknowledgements

25

Theauthorswouldliketothank:

• Allofthepatientsandtheirfamilies

• SUMMITstudyinvestigatorsandclinicaltrialstaff