suny coil conference 2016

18
Internationalizing Teacher Education Coursework: Professors and Students Reflect on Their Purposes, Projects, Processes, and Perspectives SUNY COIL Conference 2016 Universidad de Monterrey: Prof. Beatriz Gómez, Margarita Coronado, Abby Orta, & Marisa Valtier SUNY Geneseo: Prof. Jennifer King, Emily Arko, & Janine “Jay” Rossi

Upload: others

Post on 09-Feb-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

Internationalizing Teacher Education Coursework:

Professors and Students Reflect on Their

Purposes, Projects, Processes, and Perspectives

SUNY COIL Conference 2016Universidad de Monterrey: Prof. Beatriz Gómez, Margarita Coronado,

Abby Orta, & Marisa Valtier

SUNY Geneseo: Prof. Jennifer King, Emily Arko, & Janine “Jay” Rossi

Page 2: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

PurposesOur world is becoming increasingly internationalized through migration, digitization, and globalization. Current

conversations in education include global competence and internationalizing the curriculum (Mansilla &

Jackson, 2011; West, 2012; Zeichner, 2010). Therefore, it is important that teacher educators integrate global

perspectives and experiences into coursework so that future teachers develop knowledges and sensibilities

about various cultures and educational systems around the word.

As teacher educators, we know that our teacher candidates will likely teach in very diverse classrooms.

Therefore, we are committed to integrating culturally relevant pedagogy into our teacher education courses.

We are also committed to integrating instructional technology in our courses to foster student engagement

and learning. COIL is a great way to accomplish these goals. Personally, we are both also interested in study

and travel abroad and learning about other cultures. COIL bridges our professional and personal goals and

interests.

Page 3: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

ContextFIRST CONTEXT:

Universidad de Monterrey (UDEM), México

Profesora Beatriz Gómez

“Introduction to the Education Sciences”

two sections (23 + 23 students)

SECOND CONTEXT:

SUNY Geneseo, U.S.A.

Professor Jennifer King

“Dimensions of Teaching”

two sections (15 + 11 students)

THIRD CONTEXT: two virtual classrooms

combined morning sections (38 students) & combined afternoon sections (34 students)engaging in COIL

Fall 2015 Semester

connectivity & productivity through online, digital tools (e.g., Skype, Messenger, Google apps, etc.)

Page 4: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

Digital Tools Used◦ For videoconferencing: Skype, FaceTime, Facebook Video Chat

◦ For messaging: Facebook Messenger, email, Whatsapp

◦ For online discussions: Edmodo

◦ For creating documents & slides: Google Apps (Docs, Slides)

◦ For sharing files: Google Drive, Edmodo

Page 5: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

Project & Processes: COIL Activity #1Icebreaker- 2 to 3 students per group

Students posted information about themselves

E.g., name/nickname, nationality, place of origin, likes and dislikes, interests and pastimes, course of study

Students also posed a question to be answered by the other small-group members

Ex., What is a country that you would like to travel to?

Concluded with a whole-class Skype session

free-flowing discussion

focused on building relationships and intercultural exchange

Page 6: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

Voices of the Students: COIL Activity #1◦ The Icebreaker Activity was really beneficial for us because it allowed us to begin

communicating with each other on a digital platform that was easy for us to use. (Emily)

◦ After sharing and learning basic information about ourselves, it was easier for us to begin working together. (Emily)

Page 7: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

◦ This first activity allowed me to get to know my peers, those who I will be working with and be able to learn a little bit about their background which will help us set up a good and pleasant environment. (Margarita)

Page 8: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

Project & Processes: COIL Activity #2Comparative Education Project

◦ 4 to 7 students per group

Purpose: for students understand the overall educational systems in each other’s home countries, exploring schooling from early childhood through university

◦ Small groups participated in a videoconference to have an open, unstructured discussion about this topic

◦ Each group prepared a 5-8 minute presentation comparing the educational systems in Mexico and the USA

◦ Each group presented its presentation during our second whole-class Skype session◦ Each student wrote a 1-2 page reflection paper in their native language about what they learned

from this activity

Page 9: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

Voices of the Students: COIL Activity #2◦ Prior to the videochat, I expected to have more differences in our educational systems

than similarities -- but I was proven very wrong! (Emily)◦ Examples of similarities: public schools do not have religious affiliations while it is more likely that a private

school would and the duration of the school year is roughly the same as well. (Emily)◦ Examples of differences: lesser importance placed on extracurricular activities in Mexico than the U.S.

and it is more common for U.S. students to continue on to college than the Mexican students. (Emily)◦ We found that there was much overlap, but the differences were very interesting to learn about. (Emily)◦ We learned that students from both countries take tests when applying to colleges.◦ It was a great opportunity and experience where I got to communicate the educational system we have in

México and compare it with the one the US has as well as clarifying any doubts I had about their system and the way it functions. (Margarita)

◦ As it was a great way for the students to learn about the other country’s system, it was actually very difficult to understand through whichever form of communication due to glitches and language barriers. (Jay)

Page 10: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

Project & Processes: COIL Activity #3Research Project on a Current Topic in Education◦ Each class brainstormed a list of potential topics◦ Instructors then provided students with a list of a dozen or so topics from those suggested by the students◦ Research groups consisted of the existing groups for Activity #2◦ Each small group conducted a videoconference to discuss the topics and select one to research

Project requirements:

◦ Develop 2-3 research questions◦ Obtain 5-7 sources to inform the research◦ Write an APA reference and 1-paragraph summary/critique for each source◦ Combine these references and summary/critiques to form an annotated bibliography◦ Created a visual presentation of 8-12 slides using digital tools such as Google Slides and Prezi◦ Create a 1-page précis to supplement the presentation◦ Share your project with your home class members

◦ NOTE: This change in presentation delivery was a result of feedback from the students that it was awkward trying to present to both classes simultaneously via Skype.

Page 11: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

Voices of the Students: COIL Activity #3

◦ I got to learn a lot about this activity not only in the content related to it but, the importance of having a constant and clear communication with your group in order to accomplish what you are requested to perform. (Margarita)

Page 12: SUNY COIL Conference 2016
Page 13: SUNY COIL Conference 2016
Page 14: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

Perspectives: Instructors◦ The COIL experience can be meaningful even when one group is from a high school (Prof.

Gómez’s afternoon section) and the other from a university (Prof. King’s afternoon section).

◦ The motivation to participate is different for each group, but both can engage with the

activities and be interested to know each other.

◦ Technology is not always reliable, so be prepared to be flexible, and try to have at least one

backup plan when trying to connect and collaborate.

◦ The process of planning and implementing COIL activities is very time consuming, but also

very rewarding. We developed meaningful friendships and did great work! We encourage

other faculty and students to embark on the COIL journey.

Page 15: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

Perspectives: Students◦ The students...

◦ Learned that they were not so different as they expected◦ Most of them value education, enjoy spending time with friends and family, and

like to socialize◦ Were surprised to discover many commonalities between the educational systems in

both countries, to include similar problems facing teachers and students◦ Collaborated to learn about a number of contemporary topics in education within the

USA and México◦ Preferred to have a semi-structured discussion in whole-class Skype sessions, rather

than deliver formal presentations◦ Preferred to Skype in small groups, rather than as a whole class

Page 16: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

◦ We still struggled with problems regarding language barriers, technology, and even some disinterest expressed by the students.

◦ One of the groups had a UDEM student who only spoke and understoodSpanish. Given that the Geneseo students only spoke English, thismeant that extra time was required to translate conversations.

◦ Very tedious ◦ Some ideas and messages were lost in translation◦ Translation means repetition

◦ Geneseo Spanish Major, Jay, would attempt to speak to the only

Spanish speaker, but the other Geneseo classmate would not understand what Jay said.

Perspectives: Students(cont’d)

Page 17: SUNY COIL Conference 2016

◦ Technological difficulties:◦ In class Skype calls did go through, but the image and sound were very low

quality.◦ Using an external microphone helped◦ Individual groups found that FaceTime and Facebook Chat were a lot more

helpful

◦ Students' disinterest:◦ Not all students appreciated the value of COIL◦ Some students did not engage in the assignments◦ The majority of Geneseo students spoke little or no Spanish◦ The generalized idea that the United States is ethnocentric

was manifested through some of these students◦ On the other hand, there were non-Spanish major Geneseo students

who were genuinely interested in our assignments

Perspectives: Students(cont’d)