sup003-001 fe sector carbon footprint report january 2015 doc
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
1/27
Scottish Colleges Carbon Footprint Report
January 2015
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
2/27
Contents
Executive Summary 1
1 Introduction 2
1.1 General 2
1.2 Background to the Organisations 2
1.3 Report Structure 3
2 Methodology 5
2.1 Reporting Principles 5
2.2 Scope 6
2.3 Data Sources 8
2.4 Boundaries 8
2.5 Emissions sources 8
2.6 Emission factors 8
3 Footprint Results 10
3.1 Carbon emissions equivalent baseline 10
4 Tracking emissions over time 14
5 Analysis and Observations 14
6 Assumptions and Limitations 14
7 Summary 15
Appendix A 16
Appendix B 41
Appendix C 42
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
3/27
1
Executive Summary
In partnership with the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), Zero Waste Scotland (ZWS) has
developed a carbon emissions (tCO2e1) footprint baseline (‘footprint’) for colleges in
Scotland to assist with the monitoring of progress to reduce emissions in the Further
Education (FE) sector. As part of this process all Scottish colleges in the FE sector werecontacted to request energy, waste, water and transport fuel use data which was used to
calculate the carbon baseline of Scotland’s FE sector. The carbon baseline has been
calculated based on the Green House Gas (GHG) Protocol2 methodology.
Colleges were requested to provide primary data where possible. Where incomplete data
sets were provided, extrapolations and historical data where publically available, were used.
Extrapolations have been based on complete data sets received from the other colleges.
The SFC and the Environmental Association for Universities and Colleges (EAUC) also
provided data which has been used in producing this carbon footprint.
The footprint has been broken down by emission source, scope and individual college. The
overall carbon footprint of the FE sector in Scotland for 2013/14 is 59,542 tCO2e.
1 (C2)
2 G G , C A
://..////.
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
4/27
2
1 Introduction
1.1 General
With an uptake of 400,000 students per year from across Scotland, the Further Education
(FE) sector plays an important role in the agenda of the Scottish Government. The ClimateChange (Scotland) Act, 2009, emphasises that “reducing greenhouse gas emissions and
transitioning to a low carbon economy will help create a more successful country, with
opportunities for all of Scotland to flourish, through increasing sustainable economic
growth” . Part 4 of the Act places climate change duties on Scottish public bodies, which
includes the FE sector.
In partnership with the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), Zero Waste Scotland (ZWS) has
developed a carbon emissions (tCO2e) footprint baseline (‘footprint’) for colleges in Scotland
to assist with the monitoring of progress to reduce emissions in the FE sector.
As part of this process, all Scottish colleges in the FE Sector were requested to provide
energy, waste, water and transport fuel use data. The received data was used to calculate
the footprint of Scotland’s FE sector based on the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocolmethodology3. This report presents the calculated carbon emissions baseline.
Following a reorganisation of the FE sector, the number of colleges in Scotland was reduced
from 46 to 254 with just under a third of these being considered new colleges. These new
colleges have changed in terms of estate, procurement and size. Some colleges are now of
a size to potentially be eligible for the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) Energy
Efficiency Scheme5, and all fall under the Universities & Colleges Climate Change
Commitment for Scotland (UCCCfS) – a copy of which is given in Appendix B.
Subsequently, all of Scotland's colleges have signed the UCCCfS, which requires thepreparation and publication of a five-year Climate Change Action Plan. The Action Plansmust include targets and timescales to achieve a significant reduction in emissions from all
our activities, including:• Energy consumption and source;
• Waste reduction, recycling and responsible disposal;
• Sustainable estate development;
• Sustainable travel planning; and
• Responsible procurement of goods and services.
The Commitment requires colleges to report their carbon emissions annually.
1.2 Background to the Organisations
The data for this carbon emissions baseline has been collated through two parallel
processes.
Nine6 of the recently amalgamated colleges are participating in ZWS’s Carbon Management
Programme, the aim of which is to develop a carbon management plan for each college. To
assist in developing the plans, each college has produced a baseline carbon footprint.
Colleges not participating in the ZWS carbon management programme were requested to
provide data on energy, water waste and transport use. This data was subsequently
3 G G , C A
://..////. 4
F C ://...///FC.
5://../
6 C : C G C,
D A C, E C, F C, F C, G C C, G
K C, E C C (C).
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
5/27
3
converted to carbon emissions and combined with the data from colleges participating in the
Carbon Management Programme, to produce a carbon baseline of the Further Education
sector.
A complete data set was not available for all colleges and therefore extrapolations were
used where data was missing; this applied to 10 colleges. In addition, historic data was
used for Moray College UHI (University of Highlands and Islands) from their published2008/09 footprint. Extrapolation methods are discussed in the Methodology section. A
summary of data used in the carbon emissions baseline is outlined in Table 1:
Table 1: Summary of data used by type by college
College Data SubmittedEstimation/Extrapolation
Historicalsecondarydata
Ayrshire College
Borders College
City of Glasgow College
Dumfries & Galloway College Dundee and Angus College
Edinburgh College
Fife College
Forth Valley College
Glasgow Clyde College
Glasgow Kelvin College
Inverness College UHI
Lews Castle College UHI
Moray College UHI
New College Lanarkshire
Newbattle Abbey College
North East Scotland College
North Highland College UHI
Orkney College UHI
Perth College UHI
Sabhal Mor Ostaig UHI
South Lanarkshire College
West College Scotland
West Highland College UHI
West Lothian College
1.3 Report Structure
This report presents the results of the FE Sector footprint and details the scope, boundary,
assumptions and methodology used in its creation.
The methodology used for the footprint calculations is covered in Section 2, including the
reporting principles that the methodology is based on and how the baseline is broken down
into different emission scopes for reporting.
Sources of data and boundaries for data gathering are summarised in Sections 2.3 and 2.4
respectively, and in detail for each college in Appendix A. Sources of emissions and emission
factors are also provided in Section 2.5 and 2.6 respectively.
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
6/27
4
The footprint results are presented in Section 3, with results by emission scope, by college
and by emission source.
This report discusses the findings from the footprint in Section 3.1. Suggestions for
improving future footprinting exercises are presented in Section 4.
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
7/27
5
2 Methodology
This section sets out the methodology employed to produce the FE Sector footprint.
2.1 Reporting Principles
The following key principles are central to the development of the footprint and are applied
throughout the calculation for the baseline year and should be considered for any
subsequent annual calculations.
2.1.1 Relevance
All identified sources of carbon emissions considered likely to make a material (greater than
1%) contribution to the sector footprint were included in the data collection exercise.
No sources are knowingly excluded without initial quantification and assessment of its
contribution to the overall footprint.
2.1.2
Completeness
To identify all relevant sources of carbon emissions and water use, a process map (figure 1)
was developed for an example college estate.
Figure 1: Typical college carbon emission sources
Extrapolations were required where data was not available for all individual colleges, or for
parts of the individual college footprints. Where extrapolation was required, this has been
applied on a conservative basis, the aim being to over-estimate (rather than under-
estimate) the carbon footprint. Additionally, material over-estimation has been considered
and avoided as far as possible.
Extrapolations have been used to fill gaps in data where a college provided an incomplete
data set (for example, provided energy data but not water or waste). Extrapolations based
on Gross Internal Area (GIA) in terms of meters squared (m2) have been used where no
energy, water, waste or transport data was provided. Details of these extrapolations are
provided in the college summaries in Appendix A.
2.1.3 Consistency
The scope, boundaries, data sources, calculation methodologies, assumptions and
extrapolations used have been documented in this report so they can be consistentlyapplied year on year to allow meaningful comparison of the footprint in future.
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
8/27
6
This footprint is aligned to the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol, adding to the credibility and
consistency of the scope and approach.
2.1.4 Transparency
To assist the colleges communicate the footprint to stakeholders and third parties,
information on the scope, boundaries and overall outputs is provided in this report.
Throughout the development of the footprint, detailed records of each college’s data,
methods of calculation, assumptions and extrapolations have been made, with the objective
of retaining a transparent and comparable audit trail for the assessment. A summary of
each college footprint is provided in Appendix A.
2.1.5 Accuracy
In all aspects of the footprint, uncertainty has been reduced as far as is practicable by the
use of primary data relating to the specific colleges. Where this was unavailable, historical
data, where publically available, and extrapolation based on data from other colleges has
been used.
2.2 Scope
Data is presented by scope. The GHG Protocol7 categorises GHG emissions as scope 1, 2 or
3 emissions, as defined below and shown in Figure 2.
Presenting the footprint by scopes allows understanding of the key emission sources in the
sector footprint. It gives potential for programmes in future years to target improvements in
data collection to areas where data has been identified to be less robust in this footprint.
This footprint is measured in tCO2e (carbon dioxide equivalents, used to enable comparison
of different greenhouse gases in one unit of measurement).
7 G G : A C A E,
I; B C D, 2004.
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
9/27
7
Figure 2: Emissions Scopes8
Scope 1 Emissions: Direct emissions occur from sources that are owned or controlled by
the organisation, for example, emissions from combustion in owned or controlled boilers,
furnaces, vehicles, etc.; emissions from chemical production in owned or controlled process
equipment.
Scope 2 Emissions: Electricity - indirect emissions arising from the generation of
purchased electricity consumed by the organisation. Emissions from electricity generated
on-site are also classed as Scope 2.
Scope 3 Emissions: An optional reporting category that allows for the treatment of allother indirect emissions. Scope 3 emissions are a consequence of the activities of the
organisation, but occur from sources not owned or controlled by the company. Examples of
scope 3 activities are extraction and production of purchased materials; transportation of
purchased fuels, including electricity; and use of sold products and services. Scope 3 also
includes the Transmission and Distribution (T&D) losses for purchased electricity supplied
through the grid.
8 G A , F
20122013
CO2 SF6 CH4 N2O HFCs PFCs
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
10/27
8
2.3 Data Sources
To establish a footprint of the Scottish FE sector a Carbon Baseline Tool was developed. This
required information from each college, covering annual energy, waste, water and transport
data.
The 9 colleges participating in the ZWS Carbon Management Programme were presentedwith the Carbon Baseline Tool and advised by their Programme Advisor on the collection and
collation of data and the input of data into the Carbon Baseline Tool. This data was reviewed
by the Programme Advisor and checked for irregularities or errors.
Non ZWS Programme participant colleges were issued a data request to complete and
return. Data collection was undertaken by email and non-responding institutions were
contacted by telephone. As data was received it was inserted into the Carbon Baseline Tool.
As spreadsheets from different colleges were returned and inserted into the tool, data was
reviewed to check the accuracy, and to identify areas where clarification was needed.
In some instances, the data supplied was not sufficient enough to complete a footprint of
that college, and in other cases no data was available for entire colleges. In these
circumstances historical data was then requested. Historical data was available for MorayCollege UHI from their 2008/09 footprint. Where no historical data was available for a
college, its emissions were estimated and extrapolated based on data from the other
colleges.
2.4 Boundaries
Carbon footprints are generally defined in relation to two boundaries: the organisational
boundary and the operational boundary.
Financial control is a common approach used for the organisational boundary. An
organisation has financial control over an operation or asset if it directly or indirectly has the
ability to direct the financial and operating policies of the operation with a view to managingthe economic impacts or benefits from the its activities. In the university and colleges
context, the organisations are largely responsible for the financial performance (and risks)
of the operation and its assets; thus financial control was chosen ahead of operational
control (the alternative approach) as operational control is less relevant.
The operational boundary includes all Scope 1 and 2 emissions relevant to the operation of
the colleges, as detailed in Section 2.5.
2.5 Emissions sources
Emissions arising from the following categories were included, where reported, in the
footprint:
• Buildings (e.g. electricity, gas, fuel oil);
• Transport (e.g. staff mileage, school fleet transport);
• Waste (e.g. food waste, recyclables, WEEE9); and
• Water (e.g. potable water supply and treatment).
All other sources not included within these four categories were excluded from this
footprint.
2.6 Emission factors
Data on energy use, travel and transport, water supply, wastewater treatment and waste to
landfill were converted into carbon emissions (tCO2e) using recognised GHG Protocol
9 E E E (EEE).
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
11/27
9
consistent emission factors provided in Defra’s10 /DECC11’s Greenhouse Gas Guidelines and
Conversion Factors for Company Reporting (2014)12. These are presented in Appendix C.
10 D E, F A (D)
11 D E C C (DECC)12
://...//2014%20E%20F%20%
20FIA4J14.
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
12/27
10
3 Footprint Results
This section details the results of the Scottish FE Sector footprinting project. The overall
footprint of the FE sector in Scotland is 59,542 tCO2e.
3.1
Carbon emissions equivalent baselineColleges provided data for either 2012/2013 or 2013/2014, depending on data availability
and any current reporting cycles.
Figure 3 shows the total footprint in tCO2e broken down by emissions scope, as defined in
section 2.2 of this report. This shows that scope 2 emissions (associated with electricity
use) contribute the most to the total baseline. Scope 1 emissions (associated with fuel
combustion) are the next largest contributor. Figure 4 provides further details on emission
sources within scopes. The category ‘unknown’ scope includes sources of transport where it
is unknown whether these are vehicles owned by the colleges, or whether they are rented
or staff-owned. The use of ‘unknown’ was reduced as far as possible from the data received
through clarification with the colleges.
Figure 3: Total Footprint by emissions scope
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
13/27
11
Total Footprint Breakdown by Emissions Source
Figure 4 shows the total footprint in tCO2e by emissions source: buildings, transport, waste
and water. This shows that buildings’ emissions (associated with scope 2 energy use)
contribute the most to the total footprint; therefore electricity and fuel use in buildings is
the key contribution to the colleges’ carbon footprints.
The emissions arising from buildings account for 94% of the total colleges’ footprint, waste
contributes 3%, transport contributes 2% and emissions from water are just 1% of the total
footprint.
Figure 4: Total footprint by emissions source
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
14/27
12
Total Footprint by College
Figure 5 shows the total footprint in tonnes of CO2e by college. This shows the absolute
footprint, and does not take into account that some colleges are much larger than others
and so may have larger absolute footprints. Individual college footprints are given in
Appendix A.
Figure 5: Total footprint by college
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
15/27
13
Footprint breakdown of tCO2e by m2 for each college
Figure 6 shows tonnes of CO2e per m2 floor areas for each college presented as tCO2e per
m2 where m2 is the gross internal area (GIA) of the college. The emissions by GIA range
between colleges from 0.01 to 0.12 tCO2e per m2.
Figure 6: Carbon emissions (tCO2e) footprint by college per m2
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
16/27
14
4 Tracking emissions over time
It is not known at this time how the Scottish FE Sector footprint will be used to monitor
emissions reduction progress, or at what intervals the process of calculating the Sector
footprint is likely to be repeated. However, the method, scope and boundaries used to
calculate this footprint have been clearly set out in this document allowing the process to be
repeated at a future time and for a credible comparison to be made.
The footprint exercise is valuable for colleges beyond the creation of a baseline number. The
completed Carbon Management Plan (for colleges participating in the ZWS Carbon
Management Programme) and baseline tool will be valuable tools for tracking emissions
over time. This will enable colleges to understand the impact emissions savings projects are
having/will have in reducing their total footprint.
5 Analysis and Observations
The key contribution to the footprint is energy used in buildings, in particular scope 2
electricity use. Transport emissions are the second highest after buildings’ use, and a high
proportion of these relate to scope 3, which relates to staff travel on public transport or intheir own, or rented vehicles.
Recommendations for improving and completing future footprints include:
• Individual colleges should be advised of the importance of establishing and
maintaining systems/processes for the collation of energy, water, waste and
transport data on a regular basis (minimum six monthly). This will help colleges and
the SFC better collect the data and prepare for the implementation (date not known)
of mandatory public sector carbon emission reporting in Scotland;
• Minimise changes to the data collection spreadsheets, as year on year, colleges will
become more familiar with data return thus making it easier for them to complete it;
• Provide colleges with advance warning of when the data will be required and allow
sufficient time for the colleges to complete the data return; and• Provide support to the colleges with completing the data return.
6 Assumptions and Limitations
Gathering data from colleges was a key limitation in this project. Compilation of the
footprint relied upon receiving accurate data from each college; however in some cases this
data was not available for all or part of the college.
This limitation was overcome by the use of extrapolations. Extrapolations were applied
where data was not available for all individual colleges, or for parts of the individual college
footprint.
Extrapolations based on GIA in terms of meters squared (m2) were used where no energy,
water, waste or transport data was provided. Details of extrapolations are provided on a
college by college basis in Appendix A. Where no data was available for a college, the
average of all of the other colleges was used, based on the average tCO2e per m2 GIA.
Further assumptions are discussed in the college summaries in Appendix A.
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
17/27
15
7 Summary
The overall footprint of the FE sector in Scotland is 59,542 tCO2e. The footprint has been
based on primary, secondary and extrapolated data for 24 colleges in Scotland. Of the 25
SFC funded colleges, one did not provide data through the data collection exercise. The
emissions arising from buildings (scope 1 and 2) account for 94% of the total footprint,
while waste contributes 3%, transport contributes 2% and emissions from water are just1% of the total footprint. To further improve the robustness of future footprints
consideration should be given to supporting colleges to implement, maintain and improve
systems for collecting data and minimise changes to the process for collecting the data.
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
18/27
16
Appendix A
College summariesSummary for each college including the college footprint split by scope, sources of data
received, specific assumptions/limitations and extrapolations is given below.
This Appendix is available on request from Deanne Holden, Policy/Analysis Officer,Capital and Climate Change, Scottish Funding Council: [email protected]
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
19/27
41
Appendix B
Universities and Colleges Climate Commitment for Scotland
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
20/27
Appendix C
tCO2e Emission Factors Used
The following emission factors from Defra’s Guidelines to Defra/DECC’s Greenhouse Gas Conversion Facto
applied in the modeling of the 2012, 2013 and 2014 footprint. Beyond 2014, future years are the same a
baseline tool should update the factors when latest DEFRA/DECC figures are published.
Table 1: Defra emission factors used in the calculation of the 2012-2014 carbon footprint, with reference
Buildings andWater
EmissionType
Units 2012 2013 2014
Scope
(whereknown)
Activity
Grid Electricityuse
Electricity(kWh)
kg CO2e/kWh 0.4600 0.4455 0.4943 2 Generation
Gas use Gas (kWh) kg CO2e/kWh 0.1852 0.1840 0.1850 1 Gross
Gas oil use Gas Oil (kWh) kg CO2e/kWh 0.2778 0.2718 0.2721 1 Gross
Fuel Oil use Fuel Oil (kWh) kg CO2e/kWh 0.2683 0.2688 0.2695 1 Gross
Potable Water Potable Water- Supply (m3)
kg CO2e/m3 0.3441 0.3441 0.3441 3 Potable WatSupply
Potable Water
Potable Water
- Treatment(m3)
kg CO2e/m3 0.7085 0.7085 0.7085 3Potable WatTreatment
Diesel use Diesel (litres) kg CO2e/litre 2.5835 2.6008 2.6024 1 Average bio
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
21/27
Buildings andWater
EmissionType
Units 2012 2013 2014Scope(whereknown)
Activity
blend
RenewableEnergy
Exported (kWh)
PhotovoltaicExport (kWh)
kg CO2e/kWh -0.4600 -0.4455 -0.4943 2 Exporting ofelectricity to
grid
RenewableEnergyExported (kWh)
Wind Export
(kWh)kg CO2e/kWh -0.4600 -0.4455 -0.4943 2
Exporting ofelectricity togrid
Renewable
EnergyConsumed(kWh)
PhotovoltaicUsed (kWh)
kg CO2e/kWh 0 0 0 2
RenewableEnergyConsumed(kWh)
Wind Used(kWh)
kg CO2e/kWh 0 0 0 2
Biomass (kWh)Wood pellets(kWh)
kg CO2e/kWh 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 1
As per Defraguidance thonly includinN2O and CH
CO2 is notincluded
Biomass (kWh)Wood chips
(kWh)kg CO2e/kWh 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 1
As per Defraguidance thonly includin
N2O and CHCO2 is notincluded
Petrol use Petrol (litres) kg CO2e/litre 2.2423 2.2144 2.1914 1 Average bioblend
LPG LPG (kWh) kg CO2e/kWh 0.2146 0.2145 0.2145 1 Gross
Kerosene Burning Oil kg CO2e/kWh 0.0511 0.2456 0.2467 1 Gross
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
22/27
Buildings andWater
EmissionType
Units 2012 2013 2014Scope(whereknown)
Activity
(kWh)
BiodieselBiodiesel
(litres)kg CO2e/litre 0.0175 0.0187 0.0195 1
Biogas Biogas (kWh) kg CO2e/kWh 0.2460 0.2460 0.2460Outsideof scope
Heat and Steam Steam (kWh) kg CO2e/kWh 0.2199 0.2164 0.2441 1
OtherOther - Water(t CO2e)
t CO2e 1000 1000 1000
OtherOther -Buildings (tCO2e)
t CO2e 1000 1000 1000Other activitbuildings
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
23/27
Waste Waste Type Units 2012 2013 2014Scope(whereknown)
Waste frac
General WasteGeneral Waste- Landfill(tonnes)
kg CO2e/tonne 289.8350 289.8350 289.8350 3Municipal wato landfill
General WasteGeneral Waste- AD (tonnes)
kg CO2e/tonne 21 21 21 3Municipal wato anaerobicdigestion
PaperPaper(tonnes)
kg CO2e/tonne 21 21 21 3Paper and BPaper (Recyclosed loop)
CardboardCardboard(tonnes)
kg CO2e/tonne 21 21 21 3
Paper and BCardboard(Recycled -closed loop)
MixedRecyclables
MixedRecyclables
(tonnes)
kg CO2e/tonne 21 21 21 3 Municipal wa(Recycled -
loop)
WEEEWEEE(tonnes)
kg CO2e/tonne 21 21 21 3WEEE – mix(Recycled - loop)
FoodFood - Landfill
(tonnes)kg CO2e/tonne 570 570 570 3
Organic wasFood and DrWaste to lan
FoodFood - AD
(tonnes)kg CO2e/tonne 21 21 21 3
Organic wasFood and Dr
Waste to aedigestion
OtherOther - Waste(t CO2e)
t CO2e 1000 1000 1000 3Other activitwaste
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
24/27
Transport Transport Units 2012 2013 2014Scope(whereknown)
Activity
Flights
Flights -Domesticaverage
(passengerkm)
kgCO2e/passenger
km
0.3439 0.3266 0.2932 3Domestic w(average
passenger)
Flights
Flights - Shorthaul average(passengerkm)
kgCO2e/passengerkm
0.1963 0.1925 0.1663 3Short haul wRF (averagepassenger)
Flights
Flights - Longhaul average
(passengerkm)
kgCO2e/passengerkm
0.2246 0.2265 0.2102 3Long haul wRF (averagepassenger)
RailRail(passengerkm)
kgCO2e/passengerkm
0.0582 0.0490 0.0474 3National Rai(averagepassenger)
Fuel Diesel (litres) kg CO2e/litre 2.5835 2.6008 2.6024Diesel (averbiofuel blend
Fuel Petrol (litres) kg CO2e/litre 2.2423 2.2144 2.1914Petrol (averbiofuel blend
Car (diesel)Car - AverageDiesel (km)
kg CO2e/km 0.1870 0.1832 0.1855Average DieCar
Car (petrol) Car - AveragePetrol (km)
kg CO2e/km 0.2019 0.1981 0.1939 Average PetCar
Car (diesel)
Car - Small(up to 1.7litre) Diesel(km)
kg CO2e/km 0.1430 0.1405 0.1470 Small Diese
Car (petrol) Car - Small kg CO2e/km 0.1652 0.1619 0.1606 Small Petro
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
25/27
Transport Transport Units 2012 2013 2014Scope(whereknown)
Activity
(up to 1.4litre) Petrol(km)
Car (diesel)Car - Medium(1.7 – 2 litre)Diesel (km)
kg CO2e/km 0.1776 0.1748 0.1772Medium Die
Car
Car (petrol)Car - Medium(1.4 – 2 litre)Petrol (km)
kg CO2e/km 0.2077 0.2049 0.2009Medium PetCar
Car (diesel)Car - Large (2litre plus)
Diesel (km)
kg CO2e/km 0.2356 0.2294 0.2305 Large Diese
Car (petrol)
Car - Large (2
litre plus)Petrol (km) kg CO2e/km 0.2979 0.2968 0.2901 Large Petrol
Van (diesel)Van (diesel)Class I (km)
kg CO2e/km 0.1532 0.1535 0.1535Class I (up t1.305 tonne
Van (diesel)Van (diesel)Class II (km)
kg CO2e/km 0.2260 0.2270 0.2270Class II (1.31.74 tonnes
Van (diesel)Van (diesel)Class III (km)
kg CO2e/km 0.2664 0.2688 0.2688Class III (1.3.5 tonnes)
Van (diesel)Van (diesel)Average (km)
kg CO2e/km 0.2490 0.2509 0.2509Average (up3.5 tonnes)
CoachCoach(passengerkm)
kgCO2e/passengerkm
0.0287 0.0293 0.0293 3 Average coa
Mini busMini bus(passengerkm)
kgCO2e/passengerkm
0.0287 0.0293 0.0293 3 Average coa
Bus Bus, average kg 0.1120 0.1116 0.1016 Average loc
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
26/27
Transport Transport Units 2012 2013 2014Scope(whereknown)
Activity
local bus(passengerkm)
CO2e/passengerkm
FerryFerry(passengerkm)
kgCO2e/passengerkm
0.1161 0.1161 0.1161 3 Ferry
TaxiRegular taxi(passengerkm)
kgCO2e/passengerkm
0.1476 0.1443 0.1776 Regular Tax
Subway/MetroUnderground(passenger
km)
kgCO2e/passenger
km
0.0719 0.0636 0.0631 Undergroun
OtherOther -Transport (t
CO2e)
t CO2e 1,000 1,000 1,000Other activit
transport
-
8/18/2019 SUP003-001 FE Sector Carbon Footprint Report January 2015 Doc
27/27