superfundsite field investigation report

GZAGeoEnviionmental, Inc.

Engineers1 andScientists •>

MII I ^

"

3Z\g^8&'«-':•;•• '<tvv I..-v'«'.- - . ' . •

ROSE HILL LANDFILLSUPERFUNDSITEFIELD INVESTIGATION REPORTSOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

GZ\

ROSE HILL LANDFILLSUPERFUNDSITEFIELD INVESTIGATION REPORTSOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

PREPARED FOR:Town of South KingstownSouth Kingstown, Rhode Island

PREPARED BY:GZA GeoEnvironmental.Inc.Providence, Rhode Island

February 1999File No. 32090

Copyright© 1999 GZA GeoEnvironmentalJnc.

GZAGeoEnvironmental, Inc.

Engineers andScientists

Februarys, 1999File No. 32090

oz\140 BroadwayProvidenceRhode Island 02903401-421-4140FAX 401-751-8613http^/www. gza.net

A Subsidiary of GZAGeoEnvironmentalTechnologies, Inc.

Mr. Jon SchockTown of South KingstownP.O. Box 331South Kingstown, Rhode Island 02880-0031

Mr. JeffCeasrineTown of Narragansett25 Fifth StreetNarragansett, Rhode Island 02882

Re: Rose Hill Landfill Superfund SiteField Investigation ReportSouth Kingstown, Rhode Island

Dear Gentlemen:

GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA) is pleased to provide this Field Investigation Report, which documents theprocedures employed and findings of our recent studies at the Rose Hill Landfill Superfund Site in SouthKingstown, Rhode Island. The work was completed in accordance with terms and conditions of our May 14,1998 contract and is subject to the limitations contained in Appendix A of the report. Section 5.00 of the report,our Conclusions, is considered an Executive Summary, and should be reviewed in conjunction with the entirereport

We hope this report satisfies your present needs. If you have any comments or need any additional information,please call Ed Summerly at (401) 421 -4140 (Ext. 3133) or via e-mail at [email protected].

Very truly yours,

GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL,INC.

J0&flriT.Unsworth,P.E.Assistant Project Manager

Edward A.Senior Project ager

Michael Power^P.E.Semor Principal

JTU/JPH:lag

cc: Cynthia Gianfrancesco.RIDEMDavid Newton, USEPA

O:\JOBS\ENV\32090.EAS\COV-LET.DOC

An Fxjual Opportunity t-mpliivcr M/W/II

GZV

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.00 INTRODUCTION 1

1.10 PROJECT OBJECTIVES 11.20 SCOPE OF WORK 1

2.00 BULKY WASTE AREA TEST PITS 2

2.10 TEST PIT EXPLORATIONS 22.20 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 32.30 AIR MONITORING RESULTS 3

3.00 BULKY WASTE AREA IRON CONTRIBUTION 4

3.10 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION 43.20 WELLHEAD SURVEY AND PIEZOMETRIC LEVELS 43.30 GROUNDWATER AND LEACHATE SAMPLING 53.40 ANALYTICAL TESTING 6

3.41 Groundwater Screening Results 63.42 Groundwater and Leachate Analytical Results 6

4.00 SOLID WASTE AREA LANDFILL GAS SAMPLING 7

4.10 SOIL GAS PROBE INSTALLATION 74.20 FIELD TESTING 74.30 ANALYTICAL TESTING 74.40 RESULTS OF FIELD TESTING 84.50 RESULTS OF VOC ANALYSIS 8

5.00 CONCLUSIONS 9

6.00 LIMITATIONS 9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GZ\

TABLES

TABLE 1TABLE 2TABLESTABLE 4

GROUNDWATER AND LEACHATE FIELD SCREENING RESULTSGROUNDWATER AND LEACHATE ANALYTICAL RESULTSLANDFILL GAS FIELD TESTING RESULTSLANDFILL GAS ANALYTICAL RESULTS

FIGURES

FIGURE 1 LOCUS PLANFIGURE 2 EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN

APPENDICES

APPENDIX AAPPENDIX BAPPENDIX CAPPENDDC DAPPENDDC E

APPENDDC F

LIMITATIONSTEST PIT LOGSSITE PHOTOGRAPHSBORING LOGSLABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS -GROUNDWATER AND LEACHATELABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS - SOIL GAS

GZ\

1.00 INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of Field Investigations conducted by GZAGeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA) for the Towns of South Kingstown and Narragansett at theformer Rose Hill Landfill in South Kingstown, Rhode Island. The investigation wasconducted in general accordance with a Work Plan approved by the Rhode IslandDepartment of Environmental Management (RIDEM) dated September 18, 1998 and issubject to the Limitations presented in Section 6 and Appendix A.

1.10 PROJECT OBJECTIVES

The principle objective of the Field Investigation program was to supplement datagenerated as part of the investigations conducted for the Site and documented in the reporttitled "Remedial Investigation Final Report, Rose Hill Superfand Site, South Kingstown,Rhode Island" produced by Metcalf & Eddy (M&E) for the United States EnvironmentalProtection Agency (USEPA) in May 1994.

Specific objectives of the investigation where to:

• evaluate the nature of materials disposed in the Bulky Waste Area,

• evaluate the contribution of the Bulky Waste Area to elevated iron levels previouslyobserved hi leachate seeps,

• evaluate current methane, carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (O2), hydrogen sulfide (H2S),and volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations in the Solid Waste Area landfillgas, and

• prepare this Field Investigation Report.

1.20 SCOPE OF WORK

Based on the previous environmental data, our general understandings of site conditions,and conversations with RIDEM, GZA completed the following Scope of Work.

Task 1 - Bulky Waste Area Test Pits - GZA conducted test pit exploration in theBulky Waste landfill to evaluate the nature of the material disposed in that area.

February 8, 1999 - File No. 32090 - Page 1

oz\

Task 2 - Bulky Waste Area Iron Contribution - GZA conducted a soil boring, wellinstallation and leachate sampling program to assess the contribution of the BulkyWaste Area to high levels of iron previously detected in leachate seeps downgradient ofthe area. This task consisted of the installation of monitoring wells, groundwatersampling, sampling leachate seeps, laboratory analysis of the aqueous samples, andconducting a groundwater elevation survey of the new and select existing monitoringwells.

Task 3 - Solid Waste Area Landfill Gas Sampling - To evaluate any trends inlandfill gas emissions from the Solid Waste Area that may impact the feasibility ofUSEPA's proposed remedial alternatives. As part of this program, landfill gas sampleswere obtained and field and/or laboratory tested.

2.00 BULKY WASTE AREA TEST PITS

The purpose of the test pit program in the Bulky Waste area was to evaluate thecomposition of the buried material. This information will be used to further assess thefeasibility of mining the Bulky Waste Area which was identified as a potential remedialalternative in the RI. The selection of landfill mining as a potential remedial alternativeassumed that the buried material contained significant amounts of "bulky materials" (i.e.,white goods, metal objects, etc.). The RI contained no exploration data concerning thenature of the materials buried in the Bulky Waste Area.

The field program involved the excavation of test pits in the Bulky Waste Area. Logs of thesubsurface explorations are attached in Appendix B, and approximate test pit locations areindicated on Figure 2, Exploration Location Plan.

2.10 TEST PIT EXPLORATIONS

Test pit locations were selected to provide areal coverage of the Bulky Waste Area. Theprogram involved the completion often test pits (identified as TP-1 through TP-10). CynEnvironmental of Stoughton, Massachusetts completed all of the test pits, and a GZA fieldtechnician was present during the field program to prepare test pit logs describingsubsurface conditions and monitor the excavation and surrounding area for methane as apercentage of the Lower Explosive Limit (%LEL), carbon monoxide (CO), and VOCs.The test pits were excavated utilizing a Hyundai 320LC-3 excavator. The test pits wereadvanced to depths of ranging from 13 to 25 feet below grade.


oz\

2.20 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

The following description of subsurface conditions is based on the explorations completed atthe Site by GZA. The descriptions are somewhat generalized; for more detailed informationrefer to the test pit logs in Appendix B. Photographs of representative the test pits areincluded in Appendix C.

In general, subsurface explorations encountered 3 inches to 1 foot of topsoil underlain by 1.5to 4.5 feet of fine to coarse silty sand. Beneath the sand was apparent municipal solid wasteapproximately 5 to more than 23 feet in thickness. Based on an average waste thickness of15.6 feet and a reported area of 7.4 acres, GZA estimates the waste volume to beapproximately 190,000 cubic yards, versus the 114,000 cubic yards estimated by M&E(M&E 1998). We also estimate the cover soil volume to be on the order of 37,000 cubicyards based on an average observed thickness of 3.1 feet. The municipal waste observedconsisted primarily of plastic, paper, glass, wood, cloth, metal, tires, etc.

No evidence of significant disposal of "white goods" or "bulky waste" was observed in theeight test pits which penetrated the wastes and we observed no evidence of the disposal ofindustrial waste (i.e., drums or sludges). At locations where the excavator was able to digbelow the waste, the waste was underlain by gray to black silty sands. The color of the sandsbelow the waste is assumed to be the result of the anaerobic conditions expected belowburied waste. Groundwater was encountered in four of the test pits at depths ranging from11 to 25 feet below ground surface. In test pit TP-8, the waste extended approximately onefoot below the water table. In TP-1 water was encountered at a depth of 11 feet, 9 feet abovethe base of the waste. Based on our observations, we believe the TP-1 observationsrepresents a perched water table condition which is common in landfills. Buried waste in theother test pits in which groundwater was encountered was not present below the water table.Our findings do not support the assumption that this area was filled with "bulky waste".

2.30 AIR MONITORING RESULTS

During the excavation of the test pits, ambient air in the vicinity of the excavations wasmonitored for health and safety reasons. A Thermal Environmental Instruments Model 5 SOBphotoionization detector was used to monitor for VOCs and a Gastech GT 300 LandSurveyor was used to monitor %LEL, O2, and H2S. No VOCs were detected abovebackground concentrations. No measurable levels of H2S were detected. The LEL levelsdetected were zero except for brief (< 10 seconds) periods during which LEL levels rose to ahigh of 1 %. Oxygen levels ranged from 20.8% to 20.9%.


oz\

3.00 BULKY WASTE AREA IRON CONTRIBUTION

The purpose of this program was to determine the contribution of the Bulky Waste Area tohigh levels of iron reportedly detected in leachate seeps downgradient of the area. Thefield program involved the installation of three groundwater monitoring wells upgradient ofthe Bulky Waste Area, a groundwater elevation survey, sampling the new monitoring wellsand previously sampled leachate seeps, and analytical testing of the samples. Boring logs ofthe groundwater monitoring wells are attached in Appendix D, and the approximatelocations of the wells and leachate seeps are indicated on Figure 2, Exploration LocationPlan.

An initial attempt was made to install the monitoring wells with a Geo-Probe rig. However,the Geo-Probe was unable to penetrate the subsurface due to cobbles and boulders. Astandard drill rig using hollow stem augers was then used to install the three monitoringwells.

3.10 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION

Groundwater monitoring locations were selected to evaluate groundwater conditionsupgradient of the Bulky Waste Area. The program involved the installation of threegroundwater monitoring wells (identified as monitoring wells GZ-2 through GZ-4). Aboring, designated GZ-1 in the Work Plan, was to be performed near the eastern end of theSite owner's driveway. However, due to the difficult drilling conditions, this location waseliminated. Guild Drilling Co. of East Providence, Rhode Island, completed all of theexplorations, and a GZA field technician was present during the field program to direct andobserve activities and prepare boring logs describing subsurface conditions. The boringswhere advanced to depths of ranging from 22 to 27 feet below grade.

A 2-inch ID PVC groundwater monitoring well with a 10-foot well screen (0.01-inch slotsize) set to span the observed water table was installed in each of the three borings. PVCconnections were threaded and no solvents or cements were used to secure the pipe fittings.Wellheads were completed with an approximately five-foot long stand pipe set 2 feet belowgrade and cemented in place. The wells are secured with a vented, lockable cap.

3.20 WELLHEAD SURVEY AND PIEZOMETRIC LEVELS

GZA conducted a wellhead elevation survey on October 28, 1998. An existing monitoringwell (MW-V) of known elevation was used as a benchmark. A Solinist water level meterwith an accuracy of + 0.01 feet was used to determine the depths to groundwater.Groundwater was typically encountered at depths of approximately 18 to 29 feet belowgrade in the newly installed upgradient wells and MW-V, and 2 to 3 feet below grade inexisting downgradient wells designated MW03-2 and MW12-1. The following tablecontains the survey and groundwater measurement results. This data was used to generatethe groundwater contours shown on Figure 2.


ozvGZ-2GZ-3GZ-4MW-VMW03-2MW12-1

head'Elevation

62.3763.9768.9467.2439.3641.82

18.5820.7525.2029.002.342.70

43.7943.2243,7443.8437.0239.12

3.30 GROUND WATER AND LEACHATE SAMPLING

On October 28, 1998, GZA personnel collected groundwater samples from the three newmonitoring wells. The sampling was performed in accordance with the US EPA's July 30,1996 Low Stress (low flow) Purging and Sampling Procedure. As part of that samplingmethodology, well stabilization was evaluated through the measurement of specific waterquality parameters recorded during the purging process. The final stabilized water qualityparameter measurements are provided in Table 1.

During groundwater sampling, a variable speed peristaltic pump was utilized to control therate of purging and limit the drawdown caused by this operation. Dedicated 3/8-inch O.D.polyethylene tubing installed in each of the existing wells was utilized as the intake anddischarge tubing for the pumps. Pharmaceutical grade tubing was utilized as the pumphead tubing and connected to the intake and discharge tubing by clamps sufficient toprevent the introduction of air into the sample. Iron samples were collected directly fromthe discharge tubing. The VOC samples were collected by means of the VOC receptacle(described below) which has been approved by the RIDEM and USEPA for use at othergroundwater monitoring sites.

The VOC receptacle consists of a 1-inch OD by 3-foot long stainless steel tube with aTeflon ball-check valve installed at the bottom. The top of the tube is fitted with astainless steel and Teflon compression fitting which allows for direct attachment to thededicated tubing. During low flow purging and sampling, the receptacle acts as anextension to the tubing. For VOC sample collection, the VOC receptacle is retrieved fromthe well, and the VOC sample is obtained directly from the receptacle using a Teflonbottom discharge valve (similar to a disposable bailer). This method allows much morecost effective low flow sampling for VOC and other pressure sensitive parameters, limitsthe potential for cross contamination (compared with non-dedicated submersible pumpssuch as the Redi Flo-2) and maintains the integrity of the sample.


GZV

Following purging, groundwater samples were collected from each well and placed inpreserved bottles provided by the project analytical laboratory. Leachate seep samples werealso collected from three locations. An orange material was observed on the surface of theseeps. The samples were collected directly from the seeps into preserved bottles provided bythe project analytical laboratory. All samples were placed in chilled coolers and transportedunder chain of custody to the laboratory.

3.40 ANALYTICAL TESTING

Laboratory testing services were provided by Mitkem Corporation which is a RIDOHlicensed testing facility. Laboratory Certificates of Analysis are presented in Appendix E,and results are summarized in Table 2. Testing results are discussed below.

3.41 Groundwater Screening Results

To evaluate the efficacy of the low flow purging and sampling program, GZArecorded levels of temperature, pH, specific conductance, dissolved oxygen (DO) andturbidity of the groundwater from the three monitoring wells sampled. Final stabilizedreadings are reported on Table 1. Temperature reading ranged from 12.6°C to 12.7°C.Levels of pH ranged from 4.8 standard units (SU) to 5.7 SU. These pH values are consideredtypical to somewhat low for groundwater in the New England area. Specific conductancevalues ranged from a low of 72 jiS/cm2 at GZ-3 to 570 nS/cm2 at GZ-4 and are typical tosomewhat high for unimpacted groundwater hi this area. Dissolved oxygen levels rangedfrom 0.04 mg/1 (GZ-3) to 0.42 mg/1 (GZ-4) and are low for groundwater in the area. Aturbidity level of 10 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) was measured at all three wells.Turbidity is a quick estimator of suspended solid content and is typically below 100 NTUwhen low flow methods are employed.

3.42 Groundwater and Leachate Analytical Results

GZA collected and analyzed groundwater and leachate samples from the three groundwater monitoring wells installed at the Site and three leachate seeps downgradient of the area.The groundwater and leachate seep samples were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260and total iron by EPA Method 6010. The leachate seep samples were also analyzed for ironbacteria by Standard Method SM9240B.

One individual VOC, MTBE which is constituent of unleaded gasoline, was detected inthe sample from GZ-2 at a concentration of 34 ug/1. No VOCs were detected in the tripblank. Iron was reported in the monitoring wells at concentrations ranging from non-detectable (ND) (<0.3 mg/1) to 0.9 mg/1. Iron was detected in the leachate seeps atconcentrations ranging from 33 to 250 mg/1. No iron bacteria was detected in any of theleachate seeps.


ozv

Based on the results of the analysis, the Bulky Waste Area appears to be contributingto the elevated levels of iron in the leachate seeps. The average concentration in thegroundwater from the three monitoring wells, assuming one half the detection limit for thenon-detected result, was 0.58 mg/1. The average iron concentration in the leachate seeps was124 mg/1,200 times the groundwater concentration. Additionally, since no iron bacteria wasdetected, the orange material observed on the leachate seeps is most likely iron from theseeps precipitating out of solution due to the change from an oxygen deficient to oxygen richatmosphere.

4.00 SOLID WASTE AREA LANDFILL GAS SAMPLING

The landfill gas data in the RI is at least six years old; thus, GZA's goal was to evaluate ifthis old information is characteristic of current landfill gas constituents. This field programinvolved the installation of six temporary soil gas probes and field and laboratory testing ofsoil gas samples. The locations of the soil gas probes are indicated on Figure 2.

4.10 SOIL GAS PROBE INSTALLATION

Three soil gas probes were installed at the approximate locations where Summa canistersamples were obtained by M&E during the RI. The other three probes were installed atlocations west of these points to evaluate the extent of the landfill gas plume migrating offsite towards residents located west of the Site along Rose Hill Road. The five-foot longstainless-steel probes were manually driven with a slide hammer. The probes were extractedapproximately one foot prior to purging and sampling. Where water was encountered, theprobes were extracted at six inch intervals until water was not drawn into the probe.

4.20 FIELD TESTING

Following their installation, the probes were purged at a rate approximately 2 liters/minutewith portable air pumps for approximately 15-30 minutes. After purging, the soil gas wasfield tested for VOCs, H2S, CO2, O2, and methane. A Thermal Environmental InstrumentsModel 580B photoionization detector utilizing a 10.6 eV lamp was used to measureconcentrations of VOCs, a GasTech Model GT 300 Land Surveyor was used to measureH2S, and a Landtec Model GA-90 was employed to measure methane, O2, and CO2.

4.30 ANALYTICAL TESTING

At three locations, a sample of the landfill gas was obtained for laboratory VOC analysis.The samples were collected from the approximate locations of the three landfill gassamples collected for laboratory analysis by M&E during the RI. As during the RI,SUMMA canisters were used to collect the samples for laboratory analysis. The sampleswere submitted to Air Toxics Ltd. of Folsom, California and analyzed for sixty VOCs byEPA Method TO-14.


oz\

4.40 RESULTS OF FIELD TESTING

Table 3 summarizes the results of the field screening program. As indicated on the table,methane levels ranged from 0 % at location GZSG-3 to 68.7% at location GZSG(11+500).VOCs and H2S were detected only at location GZSG(11+500) at concentrations of 260and 16 ppm, respectively. CO2 concentrations ranged from 0.7% at location GZSG-3 to38.3% at location GZSG(11+500). O2 was not detected at locations GZSG(13+300C) andGZSG-1. The highest O2 concentration measured was 19.8% at location GZSG-3.

The field testing indicates that methane generation rates vary significantly across the SolidWaste Area. As shown on Table 3, the methane levels detected generally appear consistentwith those measured by M&E during the RI. The only significant difference in the fieldscreening data was at the sampling point GZSG-3. Methane and CO2 concentrations werehigher during the RI as compared to levels detected during GZA's field investigation.Correspondingly, O2 concentrations were lower in the RI than in this investigation. Basedon the observed decrease in methane and CO2 concentrations and the increase in O2, webelieve that landfill gas generation in this area has decreased since the RI data wasgenerated.

4.50 RESULTS OF VOC ANALYSIS

The results of the landfill gas VOC analysis are summarized in Table 4. LaboratoryCertificates of Analysis are contained hi Appendix F. Several VOCs were detected in allthe samples obtained. Sample GZSG(3+300) contained the largest number of VOCs (22compounds) and sample GZSG(11+500) contained the fewest number of VOCs (6compounds). However, sample GZSG(11+500) contained the highest concentrations ofVOCs (2,526 parts per million by volume-ppmv). Table 4 also includes the results of thelandfill gas laboratory analysis of Summa canister samples obtained during the RI byM&E.

The suite of VOCs and concentrations detected by GZA hi the landfill gas are generallyconsistent with the data generated during the RI. Differences at locationsGZSG(13+300C) and SW(13+300) are likely due to the fact that GZSG(13+300C) wasmoved approximately 100 feet west of the location of SW(13+300) due to shallow perchedwater at the original location. A localized hot spot of VOCs appears to be present in thenorthern portion of the Solid Waste Area.

Based on the data from the RI and data generated during this field investigation, it appearsthat VOCs emissions from the Solid Waste Area have not changed significantly since theRI. Similar sampling and testing programs were employed during this investigation andthe RI. Therefore, it is appropriate to compare the data from the studies. The methanetesting results indicate that methane generation rates are decreasing in the south. Thistrend is consistent with historical information which indicates the landfill was filled fromsouth to north.


oz\

5.00 CONCLUSIONS

A Field Investigation has been conducted at the Rose Hill Landfill in South Kingstown,Rhode Island. The investigation included a subsurface exploration of the Bulky WasteArea, sampling and analysis of groundwater and leachate seeps in the vicinity of the BulkyWaste Area, and landfill gas sampling and testing in the Solid Waste Area. Based on ourevaluation of the project data, GZA has developed the following key conclusions.

• Materials buried in the Bulky Waste Area consist primarily of municipal solid wasteand are deeper and more voluminous than estimated in the M&E's FS report.

• The Bulky Waste Area is contributing to elevated levels of iron in downgradientleachate seeps and may continue to do so after capping due to the presence ofsubmerged waste.

• Landfill gas characteristics from the Solid Waste Area have not changed significantlysince the completion of the RI. A localized hot spot of VOC vapors appears to bepresent in the northern portion of the landfill area. Methane generation rates havedecreased in the southern portion of the area most likely due to the age of the waste.

6.00 LIMITATIONS

GZA's field investigation was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices ofother consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographicalarea, and GZA observed the degree of care and skill generally exercised by other consultantsunder similar circumstances and conditions. GZA's findings and conclusions must beconsidered not as scientific certainties, but rather as our professional opinion concerning thesignificance of the limited data gathered during the course of the filed investigation. No otherwarranty, express or implied, is made.

G:UOBS\ENV\32090.EAS\REPORT.DOC


TABLES

GOH

00

O

ao00

Q•JW

»-wJ

3IX,

12SO<w

ngs

Sout

h

1

00

OO ON

ON 3;<=?o

« §*— • O

= 25

S g2 S?**• f* »—» o

t tyur

b

I*llO M

cx oC M

H 5

<£

£ «I s?

aoo\oC4

1

JDO

o\0\ON

KO

1

I

1

oo

T 00

1— 1

00

3|

•»st/i> 15

00

0 |

oof> ^

°s

..ol

v/.>3=

no

1 3J QO 4>Q. fi.

E E

Q

Q

Q

DZ

Q

ro

1

•Sc0

U«

C 3« CO

&t4t i

' Jl

> s

00OO

a

IO

o

p

o

I

0u,

g

QZ

Qz

Qz

z

HZ

«

n•:^jOS

CQc£

o

g

£aMlEg1Cl

&I

HIV O Oo. Z Z

-)H° -— -« ^^Z <-c c« n

2

o<N

.0o

OsONOs

(3+3

C

»o 5S<C + 5^S a "*

*glO

o o

SW(1

1+5

G

f-l**'g SiO 095 P42 —"5. "5E ECO 01

CO <fi

<=>S t~t tt

o H• -jr

*~

<N

°. <=> oo

o o ac

GZ

SG-3

12/1

4/98

en

•> *? siM

Sam

'ple

Loc

ale

Dat

e

t-~ 0 00 2 0 0

o „

- o o

-{ O O O* o o o

o ^ ,<_> O ffi >

Vs

V)

"x

JJ€_0oo«

•o -a•S fiS o- aV Va a

I 1ON•*Os

00 S

1 ?

| I

6s IEsf^ w *$ CD •$

!§i^ w -^

I

•5 Sg

3°O «•

u

o

'a

g g g g g g g g g g i g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g

i g g g g g g g g g g i g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g

o o o ,-, o P o P p

o o o c* o *"1 oo o o r o o

^ o ***- **: o °. p o o o o p o , p .00 , o p o p o p p p5 2 o £ o £ o o o o o o o ' o 'do ' d d d c? d d d d

igg|g|gllillgigggggggggggggggggggg

o o o p

3 o o£ 0 0

. . o o o oo' odd

. , idddddo'o'ddg *o" § d 'do"

o o °. o o o o

g

•f•g•g

lls S E E S -So e g - 2 ^ - S i ^ S f g

fi5llIIiiil!iiSii!iIle - s s - -i £ i £ i £ > 0 — • — " 6 A — ' — — — • < Q < N a i S u 4 i 3 E — ' m 4

II

m

FIGURES

§

i

FROM USGS NARRAGANSETT PIER, Rl QUADRANGLE MAP(DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS PROVIDED BV EARTHVBIONS INC)

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET

0' 1200' 2400' 4800

GZV ROSE HILL LANDFILL

SOUTH KINGSTOWN RHODE ISLAND

LOCUS PLAN

JANUARY 1999 FIGURE NO 1

NVId NOIJ.V001NOIiVa01dX3,009 .OOC

6661 "83J :31Vd,009=Ml =

MV9 :

SV3 :X8 Q3AGIA38-XQ Q3>103HO

SV3 -y3KN TOdd QNVISI 3QOHy 'NOiSONI* HinOS133d Nl 31VOS OIHdVdO

NOIidiyQS3Q

1o

CV

APPENDIX A

LIMITATIONS

LIMITATIONS

1. The observations described in this report were made under the conditions stated therein.The conclusions presented in the report were based solely upon the services describedtherein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of described services orthe time and budgetary constraints imposed by Client.

2. In preparing this report, GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA) has relied on certaininformation provided by state and local officials and other parties referenced therein.Although there may have been some degree of overlap in the information provided by thesevarious sources, GZA did not attempt to independently verify the accuracy or completenessof all information reviewed or received during the course of this field investigation.

3. In the event that Client obtains information on environmental or hazardous waste issues atthe site not contained in this report, such information shall be brought to GZA's attentionforthwith. GZA will evaluate such information and, on the basis of this evaluation, maymodify the conclusions stated in this report.

4. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based in part upon thedata obtained from a limited number of soil and/or groundwater samples obtained fromwidely spaced subsurface explorations. The nature and extent of variations between theseexplorations may not become evident until further exploration. If variations or other latentconditions then appear evident, it will be necessary to reevaluate the conclusions andrecommendations of this report.

5. Water level readings have been made in the test pits, borings, and/or observation wells atthe times and under the conditions stated on the test pit or boring logs. However, it must benoted that fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfalland other factors different from those prevailing at the time measurements were made.

6. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based in part uponvarious types of chemical data and are contingent upon their validity. These data have beenreviewed and interpretations made in the report. It should be noted that variations in thetypes and concentrations of contaminants and variations in their flow paths may occur dueto seasonal water table fluctuations, past disposal practices, the passage of time, and otherfactors. Should additional chemical data become available in the future, these data shouldbe reviewed by GZA and the conclusions and recommendations presented herein modifiedaccordingly.

LIMITENV.SA (1/1/91) PAGE 1

7. Chemical analyses have been performed for specific parameters during the course of thissite assessment, as described in the text. However, it should be noted that additionalchemical constituents not searched for during the current study may be present in soil gasand/or groundwater and leachate at the site.

LIMITENV.SA (1/1/91) PAGE 2

oz\ Cd

APPENDIX B

TEST PIT LOGS

1L»ZAereOENVlRONMENTAL,INC,;MOBROAOWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl

fECHNICAL/GEOHYDHCXOGICALOOStSULTANTS

GZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE CONTRACTOR:OPERATOR:

WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's MAKE:CAPACITY:

DEPTH

-1-

-2-

-3-

-4-

-5-

-6-

-7-

T~~ *

-e-

-10-

-11-

-12-

-13-

-14-

TEST PIT FIELD LOGPROJECT

DESCRIPTION: ROSE HILL LANDFILL

LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

ItSIWINO.: TP-1

RLE NO.: 32090.5

DATE: tO/8/98

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTCYNTY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 te-3 TIME STARTED: 09-301.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED:

SOIL DESCRIPTION

5" BrownTopsoil

Cover Sal

light brown, fine to coarse SAND, little Silt

gray, line to coarse SAND, some + Silt Cover Soil

Municipal Waste

PLASTIC and PAPER products, some -Glass, some -Metal,

trace -fine to coarse Sand

2 tires

5L

1 mattress

REMARKS:

W

10

ST PIT PLAN20

*-NORTH

'.UME- 1*4cu. yd.

LEGEND:BOULDER

SIZE RANGECLASSIFICATION

6M8-

18--36"se- OR LARGER

COUNI

isrre.fiDESIGNATION

A8C

(cans and pipes) little Wood.

EXCAV.

EFFORT

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

1A

2A

1C

REMARK

NO.

PROPORTIONSUSED

TRACE (TR) 0-10%LITTLE (LI) 10-20%SOME (SO) 20-36%AND 35-50%

EXCAVATIONEFFORT

E EASYM MODERATED DIFFICULT

v-1 — OBSERVED GROUNDWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGIZA QtOcNVIHONMENTAL, INC.** BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl

fECHNICAUGEOHYDnOLOGICALCONSULTANTS

PROJECT

DESCHIPTKDN: ROSE HILt tANOFILL

LOCATION: 8OUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

TEST PIT NOJ

RLE NO.:

DATS;

TP-1

32090.5

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE

WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's

CONTRACTOR: CYNOPERATOR: TY GINGRICH

MAKE: HYUNDAICAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd.

MODEL;REACH:

320 lc-325 FT.

GROUND ELEV.:TIME STARTED:TIME COMPLETED:

9:1511:00

DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION EXCAV.

EFFORT

BOULDER

COUNT

CITY. CLASS

REMARK

NO.

-15-

-16-

-17-

-18-

-19-

-20-

-21-

-22-

-23-

-24-

-25-

-26-

-27-

-28-

20' gray, black, fine to coarse SAND, some - Silt

24.5' BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION

REMARKS:

TEST PIT PLAN20

10

NORTHUME- 144cu. yd.

LEGEND:BOULDER


6M-18-

COUNT

DESIGNATION

AB

as* OR LARGER

PROPORTIONSUSED

TRACE (TR)LITTLE (U)SOME (SO)AND

0-10%10-20%

2036%35-50%

EXCAVATIONEFFORT

£ EASYM MODERATED DIFFICULT

- OBSERVED GflOUNDWATER LEVEL

S TEST PIT FIELD LOGlicQENVIRONMENTAL* INC, PROJECTWOADWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl


v., CCHNICAL/QEOHYDnOLOGICALQONSUtfANTS LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN. RHODE ISLAND

TEST PIT NO,: TP-2

FILE NO- 32000.6

OAT€: 10ffl9B

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTQZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE/ CONTRACTOR. CYN

A. FLORI OPERATOR: TY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: SUNNY 60's MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 te-3 TIME STARTED: 13:30

CAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED:

DEPTH

-1-

-2-

-3-

-4-

-5-

-6-

-7-

•— -8-

-e-

-10-

-11-

-12-

-13-

-14-

SOIL DESCRIPTION

6' Brown Topsoil

Cover Soil

1.5' brown, fine to coarse SAND, line 1o coarse Gravel, tttte Silt

Cover Soil

2.5' gray, <me SAND, fine Gravel, some Silt

Municipal Waste

PAPER PRODUCTS, some Wood (2 box springs, laths), little Ash, little Glass

little Cloth, little Metals (i.e. wire, rods, pipe)

2 tires

fine to coarse SAND, ditto* brush

Municipal Waste

Cover Soil

PAPER PRODUCTS, some Wood (laths), little Ash, little Glass, little Metal

(i.e. pipe, rods, wire)

REMARKS

T£

10

ST PIT PLAN

20

-»NORTH

UME« 1400U. vd.

LEGEND:

BOULDER COUNT

SIZE RANGE " t£TTER

CLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION

6M8' A

le'-se* B36* OR LARGER C

EXCAV.

EFFORT

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

2A

IB

REMARK

NO.

PROPORTIONSUSED

TRACE CTfi) 0-10%LITTLE (U) 1O2OT4SOME (SO) 2<K35%

AND 3540%

EXCAVATIONEFFORT

E EASYM yOOERATt

D DIFFICULT

VOBSERVED OROUNDWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGV GtOENVlHONMtNTAL, INC.

I* '^ROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl

f£CHNICAUQ6OHYOnOtOOICALCONSULTANTS

DESCHIPINON:

LOCATION: ,

ROSE HILL LANDFILL

SOUTH KINGSTOWN. RHODE ISLAND

cST PIT NO-

FILE NO-'

DATE:

TP-2

32090.5

10/7/98

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR- A FLORI

WEATHER: SUNNY 60's

CONTRACTOR: CYNOPERATOR: TY


MODEL:REACH:

320 lc-325 FT.


10.55

DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION EXCAV

EFFORT

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

REMARK

NO.

-15-

-16-

-17-

-18-

-19-

-20-

-21-

-23-

-24-

-25-

-26-

-27-

-2S-

18' gray, black, fine to coarse SAND, some fine to coarse Gravel, little Sill

22' BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION

REMARKS.

1 No water was encountered during excavation.

TEST PIT PLAN20

to

NOHTH

'.UME- 140cu. yd.

LEGEND:

BOULDER


6--18-18-.36"

36" OR LARGER

<#owr

tETTEflDESIGNATION

AB

PROPORTIONSUSH)

LITTLE (U)SOME (SO)

AND

0-10%

10-20%20-35%

35-50%

EXCAVATIONEFFORT


OBSERVED OROUNDWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOG

«0 BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl

,reCHNICAUGEOHYDROLOGICALCONSULTANTS

GZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE/ CONTRACTOR:A. FLORI OPERATOR:

WEATHER SUNNY 60° MAKE:CAPACITY:

DEPTH

-1-

-2-

-3-

-4-

-5-

-6-

-7-

-9-

-10-

-11-

-12-

-13-

-14-

PROJECT


LOCATION; SOUTH KINGSTOWN. RHODE ISLAND

TCSTPitNO^ TP3 •

FILE NO.; 32090*

DATE: 10/7/98

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTCYNTY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 te-3 TIME STARTED: 2:501.5 cu. yd. REACH. 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED.

SOIL DESCRIPTION

3"

1 .5' brown, fine to coarse SAND,

3' gray, fine SAND, line Gravel,

Topsoil

Cover Soil

line to coarse Gravel, Mtle Silt

Cover Soil

some Silt

Municipal Waste

CLOTH, little Plastic, little Cans, little Bottles, little Metal (i.e

2 Tires, little Wood

REMARKS

TE

10

ST PIT PLAN

20

-»

NORTH"tUME- 170cu.yd.

LEGEND:BOULDER


6--18-18--36-

86' OR LARGER

COUNT

LETTERDESIGNATION

Ae0

bars, pipes),

EXCAV.

EFFORT

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

3A

1B

REMARK

NO.

PROPORTIONSUSED

TRACE (TR) 0-10%

LITTLE (U) ItWOW

SOME (SO) 2045%AND 35-50%

EXCAVATIONEFFORT


vOBSERVED GfiOUNDWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGIQZAGEOENVIRONMENTAL. INC. PROJECTl«0 BftOAOWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl

DESCRIPTtON: ROSE HILL LANDFILL

JTECHNICAUGEOHYDROLOGICALCCWSOLTANTS LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

TEST PIT NO4 TP-3

FILE NO.: 32090.5

DATE: . I0ff«o

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE/ CONTRACTOR: CYN

A. FLORI OPERATOR: TY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: SUNNY 60° MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 lc-3 TIME STARTED: 2:50


DEPTH

-15-

-16-

-17-

-18-

-19-

-20-

-21-

Y -22-

-23-

-24-

-25-

-26-

-27-

-28-

SOIL DESCRIPTION

1 8' gray, black, fine to coarse SAND, line to coarse Gravel, little Silt

22' gray, black, line - SAND, and Silt


EXCAV.

EFFORT

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

1A

REMARK

NO.

1

REMARKS:

1 . No water was encountered during excavation.

T£

10

ST PIT PLAN

20

NORTH

*XJJME» 170 cu. Vd.

LEGEND:BOULDER COUNT PROPORTIONS

USED

SIZE RANGE LETTERCLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION TRACE (TR) 0-10%

6M6' A LITTLE flj) 10-20%18--36" B SOME (SO) 2O-3S%

36" OR LARGER C AND 95-60%

EM

D

V::;,:. O

EXCAVATIONEFFORT

EASY

MODERATEDIFFICULT

BSERVED GROUNOWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGQZAGEOENVIRONMENTALt INC. •-" PROJECT' "> BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, W

DESCRIPTION: HOSE HILL LANDFILL

CONSULTANTS LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

T£ST PIT NO.; TP-4

FILE NO.: «8»O.S

DATE: 1WM98

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE/ CONTRACTOR: CYN

A. FLORI OPERATOR: TY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: SUNNY 50° MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 lc-3 TIME STARTED: 10:55


DEPTH

-1-

-2-

-3-

-4-

-5-

-6-

-7-

-8-

-9-

-10-

-11-

-12-

-13-

-14-

SOIL DESCRIPTION

6" Brown Topsoil

Cover Soil

light brown, line to coarse SAND, little line to coarse Gravel, trace Silt

Cover Soil

3.4' light gray, fine to coarse SAND, some Sill

Municipal Waste

PAPER PRODUCTS, little Glass, little Cloth, little Metal (cans), trace Wood

trace Brush J

1 tire

2 tires

REMARKS:

TE

10

ST PIT PLAN

SO

NORTH

LEGEND:

BOULDER COUNT

SIZE RANGE LETTERCLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION

6M8' *18'-36- 8

36' OR LARGER C >,

EXCAV.

EFFORT

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

1B

5A

REMARK

NO.

PROPORTIONSUSED

THACEfm) 0-10%

LITTLE (LI) \Q3Q%SOME (SO) 20-35%

AND 35-50%

EXCAVATIONEFFORT

E EASY

M MODERATED OIPFICOLT

V"=T OBSERVED eflOUNOWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGVIHONMtNTAL, (NC,

.ECHNICAL/GEOHYDROLOGICALODXSUtTANTS

PROJECT

DESCRIPfK*!: ROSE HILL LANDFILL

LOCATION: SOUTH KINSSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

TEST PIT NO.:

FILE NO.!

DATE:

TP-4

32090.5

fO/7/W

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE/

A. FLORIWEATHER: SUNNY 60"


MAKE: HYUNDAICAPACITY: 1.5

MODEL: 320 lc-3cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT.


10:55


EFFORT

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

REMARK

NO.

-15-

-16-

-17-

-18-

-19-

-20-

-21-

— -22-

-23-

-2*-

-25-

-26-

-27-

-28-

1 lire

2V gray, black fine to coarse SAND, little Silt

BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION

REMARKS:

TESTPrfPLAN20

NORTHUME» 170cu. vd.

LEGEND:BOULDER


6M8-

DESIGNATIONA

36" OR LARGER

PROPORTIONSUSED

TRACEfm>LITTLE (LI)SOME (SO)AND

0-10%10-20%20-36%

35-60%

EXCAVATIONEFFORT


OBSERVED GHOUNDWATEH LEVH

TEST PIT FIELD LOGkjZAGEOGNVIRONMENTAL, INC. - ' ' PROJECT'• "»eBOAOwAY. PROVIDENCE RI

DESCRIPTION: ROSE HILt LANDFILL

. TECHNICAUGEOHYDROLOGICALCONSULTANTS LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

TEST P4T NOJ TP-4

FILE NO.: S2090S

DATE; JOff/98

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR D. CAPACCHIONE/ CONTRACTOR: CYN

A FLOP 1 OPERATOR: TY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: SUNNY 45° MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 lc-3 TIME STARTED: 8:15

CAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED: 8:50

DEPTH

-1-

-2-

-3-

-4-

-5-

-6-

-7-

- -8-

-9-

-10-

-11-

-12-

-13-

-14-

SOIL DESCRIPTION

6' Topsoil

Cover Soil

1 .5' brown, fine to coarse SAND, fine to coarse Gravel, MUe Silt

Cover Soil

3' gray, fine SAND, fine Gravel, some Silt

Municipal Waste

PAPER, litle Plastic, Wile Can, little Bottles, little Wood, Mile Metal (i.e. bars, wires,

cable, bumper), 2 Tires

6' black, gray, fine to coarse SAND, little, fine to coarse Gravel, tittle Silt, little Roots

1 3' BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION

EXCAV.

EFFORT

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

3A

1B

1C

REMARK

NO.

REMARKS

T£

40

ST PIT PLAN20

-+NORTH

XUME~ 96cu. yd.

LEGEND:BOULOEB eouwr PROPORTIONS

USED

SIZE RANGE LETTERCLASSIFICATION Ceefcr STK*! THACetrfi) 0-10*

6M8- A LJTTLEIU) 10-20%

1S-.36" 6 SOME (SO) 20-36%36' OR LARGER C , AND 3S-60%

EMD

V: O

EXCAVATION

CFFOHTEASY

MODERATEDIFFICULT

3SEHVED GROUNDWATER LEVEL

U TEST PIT FIELD LOGQEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT

BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE. RlDESCRIPTION: ROSE HILL LANDFILL

j JIECHNICAUGeOHYDnOtOOICALCONSULTANTS LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND;: ! :

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR. 0. CAPACCHIONE/ CONTRACTOR: CYN

A. FLORI OPERATOR: TY GINGRICHWEATHER: SUNNY 50° MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 lc-3

CAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT.

DEPTH

-1-

-2-

-3-

-4-

-5-

-6-

-7-

r -e-

-8-

-10-

-11-

-12-

-13-

-14-

SOIL DESCRIPTION

1' brown Topsoil

Cover Soil

gray, tine SAND, fine Gravel, some Silt

2.5'

Municipal waste

PAPER, little Plastic, little Cans, little Bottles, little Wood, little Cloths, 8 Tires

little Metal (i e. bars, fence),

little Brush

(1) white goods (dryer)

V

T6ST PIT NO^ TP-6

FILENO4 S2000.S

DATE; 10/WW

GROUND ELEV.:TIME STARTED: 9:20TIME COMPLETED: 10:15

EXCAV.

EFFORT

E

E

€

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

4A

3A

REMARK

NO.

1

REMARKS-

1 . Water infiltrating small area in NW & NE corners at 11.5'.

fe

10

ST PIT PLAN20

-4

NORTH•OLUME- IBOcu.vd.

LEGEND:BOULDER COUNT PROPORTIONS

USED

SIZE RANGE terreRCLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION TRACE (TH) 0-10%

6M8' A LITTLE (LI) 10-80%IS'-aC" 6 SOME (SO) 20*95%

36' OR LARGER C AND 35-50%

£M

D

V',: Ol

EXCAVATIONEFFORT

EASYMODERATED»FFlCUCr

3SERVED GR0UNDWATEH LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGaZAQEOENVlBONMENTAL, INC.'"> «tOM)WAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl

fECHNICAUQEOHYOnOLOQICALCONSULTANTS

PROJECT

DESCRIPTION; ROSE HILL LANDFILL


TEST PIT

FILENOi

DATE:

82090S

1CW/B6

GZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE/A. FLORI

WEATHER: SUNNY 60's

CONTRACTOR: CYNOPERATOR: TY


EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT

MODEL:cu. yd. REACH:

320 lc-325 FT.


9:2010:15


EFFORT

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

REMARK

NO.

-15-

-16-

-17-

-18-

-19-

-20-

-21-

-22-

-23-

-2*-

-25-

-26-

-26-


REMARKS:

TEST PIT PLAN

20

NORTH

UME- 180 cu. yd.

LEGEND: -BOULDER

StZE RANGECLASSIFICATION

6M6-

36' OR LARGER

COUNT

LETTERDESIGNATION

A8C

PROPORTJONS

USED

TflACEfTR)

LITTLE (U)SOME (SO)

AND

0-10%10-20%

20-35%

35-60%

EXCAVATIONEFFORT

£ EASY

M MODERATEO DIFFICULT

OBSERVED 6ROUNOWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGIQZA GEOENVIHONMENTAL, (NC.1 ' -» BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE ftl

CONSULTANTS

PHGUECT

DESCRIPTION; ROSE HILL LANDFILL

LOCATION: SCWW KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

TEST PIT M0.1

FILE NO.:

DATfi;

320904

1OB/W

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTG2A INSPECTOR. D. CAPACCHIONE




MODEL:cu. yd. REACH:

320IC-325 FT.


11:00


EFFORT

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

REMARK

NO.

-1-

-2-

-5-

-10-

-11-

-12-

-13-

-14-

BrownTopscMl

gray, line to coarse SAND, some Silt, some -Munictpte Waste, Plastic and Paper products

Municipal Waste

PLASTIC and PAPER products, some Glass, some -Metal (cans), some Asphalt shingles, and

Wood (demo debris)

Brush

Municipal Waste

PLASTIC and PAPER products, some Glass, some Metal (cans), little Cloth

1 tire

2A

2A, 1B

2A

REMARKS-

TEST PTTPLAN20

10

NORTHXUME. 145cu.Vd.

LEGEND:BOULDER


6M8'

COUNT

tETTER

DgSWNATION

A

36* OR LARGER

PROPORTIONSUSED

TRACE (TR)

LITTLE (U)SOME (so)AND

0-10%

10-20%20-35%as-60%

EXCAVATIONEFFORT


OBSERVED OnOUNOWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGQZA GEOENVIHONMENTAL, INC.«"»8ROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, fll

fEeHNICAUGEOHYDROLOQICALLOCATION;

PMQJECT

ROSE HILI LANDFILL

SOUTH KINGSTOWN. RHODE ISLAND

TEST PIT NO.:

FH.fi NO!

DATE:

TP-7

32090.5





MODEL:REACH:

320 lc-325 FT.

GROUND ELEV.:TIME STARTED:TIME COMPLETED: 12:15


EFFORT

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

REMARK

NO.

-15-

-16-

-17-

-18-

-19-

-20-

-21-

— -22-

-23-

-24-

-25-

-26-

-27-

-28-

16.5' bfown fine to coarse SAND, some-Silt

2V BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION - POSSIBLE BOLDER

REMARKS:

1. No water was encountered during excavation.

TEST PIT PLAN20

10

NORTH

'JUME» 145 cu. yd.

LEGEND:BOULDER

SIZE RANGE

CLASSIFICATIONC--18'

18"-36"SB' OR LARGER

terreaDESIGNATION

'. ,-k'^,-*'

or.'..:...

PROPORTIONS

USED

TRACE (TR)

LITTLE (LI)

SOME (SO)AND

0-10%

10-20%

20-35%

EXCAVATION

CFFORT£ EASYM l/KDOEHATE

0 OtFFICSAT

r OBSERVED eROUNDWATER LEVEL

QZA OEOENVIRONMeNTAL, INC.IPADWAY, PROVIDENCE, fll

GcOteCHNICAL/QEOHYDRCXOQICAL^MTWTS

GZA WSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE CONTRACTOR:OPERATOR:

WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's MAKE:CAPACITY:

DEPTH

-1-

-2-

-3-

-4-

-5-

-6-

-7-

-8-

-0-

-10-

-11-

-12-

-13-

-14-

TEST PIT FIELD LOG,; . r-r , PROJECT

DEscniPwafc' f > nose HJU. LANDFILL

LOCATION; > i , , S6UTH KINGSTOWN, ftHOOE ISLAND11 * , -.i* f * •'

IfcSIPITNO.: .- tP-6

FILENOJ teaoos

DAT& , *[ lOrWW

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTCYNTY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 Ic -3 TIME STARTED: 07:001.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED:

SOIL DESCRIPTION

6- BrownTopsoK

Cover Soil

ligh) brown, fine to coarse SAND, some-Silt, fettle fine to coarse Gravel

Municipal Waste

PLASTIC and PAPER products, some Glass, some Metal, (bottles and cans) Mtle+

Cloth, little + Wood

Municipal Waste

PLASTIC and PAPER Products, some Glass, some Wood, some Sand

Municipal Waste

WOOD, some Paper, little Gates. Mile Cloth

Municipal Waste

BRUSH, some Cloth and Packaging Material, some Wood

REMARKS

>- - TEST P(T PLAN

1' 20

, t f -,

."'•' t' ";,* WORTH

UME- 170cu.yd.

tEGEND:BOULDER

size RANGECLASSIFICATION

SVIS'ir-w

36- OR LARGER

joo|t j r" ;; ':

' P?; -A-/-V- % i,8,-,,

• 'c ''•"-'-•• ' ',

EXCAV.

EFFORT

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

1A

2A

REMARK

NO.

PROPORTIONS ,

USED

TfiAcecrn) o-iofcuraepj) i<wp% :

SOME (SO) 3&&V.

AND 35-60%

EXCAVATION '

• 'CFFORT " , .£ , * .: EASy

M MODERATED DIFFICULT i

V~±T OBSERVED GflOUNDWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGZA GEOENvlfiONMENTAL, INC.- 1HOAOWAY, PROV1D6NCE, R1

. fEGHNICAUGEOHYDROLOQKJALCONSULTANTS

OESCfllPtlCfcl: ROSE HILL LANDFILL.


TEST PIT NQ.1

FILE NO.I

DATE:

TP-8

saaaos


WEATHER. OVERCAST 60's



MODEL:REACH:

320 te-325 FT.


07:00


EFFORT

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

REMARK

NO.

-15-

-16-

-17-

-16-

-19-

-20-

-21-

-22-

-23-

-24-

-25-

-26-

-27-

-28-

20' Wood, (Stumps, logs), some fine to coarse Sand and Silt

23' BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION

REMARKS:

TEST PIT PLAN20

to

tNORTH

UME. 170cu. yd.

LtGEND:

BOULDER

SIZE RANGE

CLASSIFICATION

6M6'

COUNT

36- OR LARGER

DESIGNATION

A8•C ......

PROPORTIONS

USED

TRACE 0"n)LITTLE (U)

SOME (SO)AND

0-10%10-20%

20-35%

35-60%

EXCAVATION

EFFORTE EASYM MODERATE0 DIFFICULT

- OBSERVED GBOUNOWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGIQZAGEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT'• "veBOADWAY.PROVlDENCe B!

DESCRIPTION: * ROSE HILL LANDFILL

_. .JTECHNICAUOEOHYDROLOQICALCONSULTANTS LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

TEST PiT NOJ TP-»

FILENO.I aaoaoi

DATE: 1(VB«8

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR- D CAPACCHKDNE CONTRACTOR: CYN

OPERATOR: TV GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 te-3 TIME STARTED:

CAPACITY: 1.5 cu.yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED.

DEPTH

-1-

-2-

-3-

-4-

-5-

-6-

-7-

r *-9-

-10-

-11-

-12-

-13-

-14-

SOIL DESCRIPTION

6' BrownTopsoU

hghl brown, orange, line to coarse SAND, some fine to coarse Gravel

gray, fine to coarse SAND and line to coarse Gravel, Wtte Boulders, little silt

gray, fin« to coarse SAND and fine to coarse Gravel, little Boulders, mtersperced with orange

rotten rock

gray, fine to coarse SAND and fine to coarse Gravel, some Silt

REMARKS

TE

10

ST PIT PLAN20

TNORTH

LUME. 17Sou. yd.

LEGEND:

BOULDER COUNT

SIZE RANGE LETTER

CLASSIFICATION DESiaNATKW

6M8' A18" 6- B

36' O« LARGER C

EXCAV.

EFFORT

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

3A

4A/1B/2C

10A

6A

5A

7A/1B

4A

10A

8A

14A

11A.3B

10A

9A

REMARK

NO.

PROPORTIONS

USED

TfiACE (TR) 0-10%LITTLE (U) 1O2OT4

SOME (SO) 2045%AND 3S-SO%

EXCAVATION

EFFORTE EASY

M MODERATE0 DIFFICULT

v— — OBSERVED GROUNOWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGUZA QEOEN VIHONMENTAL, INC, ; r , •*'* BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE Rl

DESCRIPTION;

CONSULTANTS LOCATION;

PROJECT

ROSE HILL LANDFILL

SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

TEST PIT NQJ TP-8

FILE NO.: 32090.5

DATS: 10/9/98

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE CONTRACTOR: CYN

OPERATOR: TY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 lc-3 TIME STARTED:

CAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED: 14:15

DEPTH

-15-

-16-

-17-

-18-

-19-

-20-

-21-

-22-

•23-

-24-

-25-

-26-

-27-

-28-

SOIL DESCRIPTION

gray, fine to coarse SAND and fine to coarse Gravel, some Silt

gray, fine to coarse SAND, some + Silt


REMARKS:

— , -

to

;ST PIT PLAN

20

NORTH

'IME- 175cu, yd.

LEGEND:BOULDER COUtf

SIZE RANGE UETTgCLASSIFICATION DEStGNAl

CMS- A

ir-36' B

36* OR LARGER C

EXCAV.

EFFORT

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

6A

7A

5A

3A

4A

10A

REMARK

NO.

r PROPORTIONS

USED

R

DON TRACE (TR) 0-10%

LITTLE (U) 10-20%

SOME (SO) 20-35%

AND 35-60%

EXCAVATIONEFFORT

E EASY

M MODERATED DIFFICULT

v— !— OBSERVED GROUNDWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGQZA GEQENVIRONMENTAL, INC.I' "» BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl

DeSCHIPTtON:

r . rECHNICAUGEOHYOHOLOGICALCONSULTANTS LOCATION:

PflOJECT

ROSE HILL LANDFILL

SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

TEST PIT NO.: TP-10

RLE NO- 3200045

DATE:

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE CONTRACTOR: CYN

OPERATOR: TY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 lc-3 TIME STARTED:


DEPTH

-1-

-2-

-3-

-4-

-5-

-6-

-7-

r~ *-8-

-10-

-11-

-12-

-13-

-14-

SOIL DESCRIPTION

6" BrownTopsoil

light brown, orange, line to coarse SAND, some fine to coarse Gravel, little Silt

gray, fine to coarse SAND, little Silt, some line to coarse Gravel

REMARKS

n

7

ST prr PLAN20

-+NORTH

UIMEx 110cu. yd.

LEGEND;BOULDER COW

SIZE RANGE LETTSCLASSIFICATION DESIGNA!

6--18- A1B"-36" B

36* OR LARGER C

EXCAV.

EFFORT

E

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

2A.3B

38,1 A

4B.6A

2B.3A

1A.2B

4A.1B

3A

2B.4A

3A

4A

REMARK

NO.

r PROPORTIONS

USED

R

(ION TRACE (TR) 0-10%

LITTLEM 10-20%

SOME (SO) 20-35%AND 35-60%

£

M

D

V(J

EXCAVATION6FFORT

EASYMODERATE

DIFflCULT

3SERV6D GHOUNDWATER LEVEL

TEST PIT FIELD LOGwNMcNl AL, WIG,

*»BC*DWAy, PROVIDENCE, Rl

<SK . eOHNICALASEOHYDROLOOICALCONSULTANTS

DESCRIPTION: ROSE HILL LANDF1LL


! rit

FILE NO;:

DATE;

TP-10

32090 J5

JO/9/98

EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTG2A INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE


CONTRACTOR: CYNOPERATOR. TY GINGRICH


MODEL:cu. yd. REACH.

320 lc-325 FT.



EFFORT

BOULDER

COUNT

QTY. CLASS

REMARK

NO.

-15-

-16-

-17-

-18-

-19-

-20-

-21-

-22-

-23-

-24-

-25-

-26-

-27-

-28-

gray, fine to coarse SAND, some - fine to coarse Gravel, little Silt

light brown, fine to coarse SAND, some fine to coarse Gravel, little


REMARKS:

TEST PIT PLAN

£0

10

NORTHME* 110cu. vd.

LEGEND:

BOULDER


SMS"

36* On LARGER

COUNT

tETTER

DESIGNATIONABC

PROPORTIONSUSED

THACE (TR)

LITTLE (U)SOME (SO)AMD

0-10%10-20%20-36%35-50%

EXCAVATIONEFFORT


OBSERVED 6ROUNDWATER LEVEL

>z\1D

n

APPENDIX C

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

ROSEHILL LANDFILLSOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND

Photograph 1 - Test Pit 1



. • v, V -• •


GZ\

ZoH^

XD

APPENDIX D

BORING LOGS

GZA GEOENV1RONMENTAL INC.

140 BROADWAY. PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND

PROJECT REPORT OF BORING NO.

Rose HM Larxtfia

South Kingstown. Rl

GEOTECH/GEOHYDROLOGICAL CONSULTANTS

NK3CO

-MAN

GZA ENGINEER

Guild Drifting Co

Thomas Paquette

AlFkxi

SAMPLER. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SAMPLER CONSISTS OF

A 2- SPLIT SPOON DRIVEN USING A 1 40 *> HAMMER FALLING 30 IN

CASING. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CASING DRIVEN USING

A 300 LB HAMMER FALLING 24 IN

SHEET

FILE NO.

GZ-2

loM

32090.4

CHKDBY JTU

BORING LOCATION

GROUND SURFACE ELEV

DATE START 10-23-98

DATUM

DATE END 10-23-98

GROUNDWATER READINGS

DATE

10-23-98

10-23-88

CASING SIZE: 5" OTHER 5* ODEX pneumatic hammer

DPTH

(FT)

5

10

r-is

20

25

30

35

CASING

(ft/mm)

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

3

2

1

1

3

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

SAMPLE

NO PEN/REC DEPTH (FT) BLOWS/B"

TIME

1618

16-32

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

BURMISTER CLASSIFICATION

Gray, fine to coane SAND, some fine to

coarse Gravel. Wile' Cobbles

Orange, fine to coarse SAND, som

coarse Gravel

» fine to

22 BOTTOM OF BORING

WATER CASING

17.0 22

163 22

STRATUM

DESCRIPTION

GRAVELLY

SANDS

STABILIZATION TIME

0

15MIN

EQUIPMENT

INSTALLED

Z

5

T

Iff of

2-

PVC

slotted

wen

screen

Grout

2" PVC

aoM

riser

Bent

Seal

F

L

T

E

R

S

A

N

D

FIELD

TESTING

R

K

4ARKS

1. Stratum descriptions are based on observations of drill cuttings

NOTES: 1 ) STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL.2) WATER LEVEL READINGS HAVE BEEN MADE AT TIMES AND UNDER CONDITIONS STATED. FLUCTUATIONS OF GROUNDWATER TABLEMAY OCCUR DUE TO OTHER FACTORS THAN THOSE PRESENT AT THE TIME MEASUREMENTS WERE MADE

GZA BORING NO GZ-2

GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL INC.

140 BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE. RHODE ISLAND

GEOTECHK3EOHYDROLOGICAL CONSULTANTS

3 CO

GZA ENGINEER

GuM Drilling Co.

Thomas Paquette

AlFlorl

PROJECT

Rose HU Landfill

South Nngstown. Rl

BORING LOCATION

GROUND SURFACE ELEV.

DATE START

SAMPLER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SAMPLER CONSISTS OF

A 2" SPLIT SPOON DRIVEN USING A 140 to. HAMMER FALLING 30 IN

CASING: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CASING DRIVEN USING

A 300 LB HAMMER FALLING 24 IN.

CASING SIZE: 5" OTHER 5" ODEX pneumatic hammer

DPTH

(FT)

5

10

IS

20

25

30

35

CASING

(D/rnn)

2

1

1

1

5

5

3

5

5

1

2

3

2

2

3

2

2

3

1

1

1

1

1

SAMPLE

NO PEN/REC DEPTH (FT) BLOWS/6-

10-23-98

REPORT OF BORING NO.

SHEET

RLE NO

CHKDBY

GZ-3

1of1

32090.4

JTU

DATUM

DATE END 10-23-98


DATE

10-23-88

10-2348

10-23-98

TIME

1130

11:45

12.20

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION


Gray, line to coourse SANO. some fine to

coarse Gravel. Mde* Cobbles

Orange, tine to coarse SAND, some ine to

coarse Gravel

23 BOTTOM OF BORING

WATER

19.7

18.2

18.1

CASING

22

22

22

STRATUM

DESCRIPTION

GRAVELLY SANDS

STABILIZATION TIME

0

15MIN

35MIN

EQUIPMENT

INSTALLED

2"

r

9-

Iff Of

2"

pvc

slotled

well

screen

Grout

2" PVC

sotd

riser

Bent

Seal

F

L

T

E

R

S

A

N

D

FIELD

TESTING

R

K

\RKS:

1. Stratum descriptions are based on observations of drill cuttings.

NOTES: 1) STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY BETWEEN SOIL TYPES: TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL.

MAY OCCUR DUE TO OTHER FACTORS THAN THOSE PRESENT AT THE TIME MEASUREMENTS WERE MADE

GZA | BORING NO GZ-3

GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL INC.

140 BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND

PROJECT REPORT OF BORING NO.

Rose Hill Landfill SHEET

South Kingstown. Rl

GEOTECH/GEOHYDROLOGICAL CONSULTANTS

•ING CO

.sftEMAN

GZA ENGINEER

Guild Drilling Co

Thomas Paquetle

Dave Capacchnne

SAMPLER. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SAMPLER CONSISTS OF

A 2" SPLIT SPOON DRIVEN USING A 140 Ib HAMMER FALLING 30 IN

CASING- UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CASING DRIVEN USING

A 300 LB HAMMER FALLING 24 IN

FILE NO.

CHKDBY

GZ-4

1of1

32090.4

JTU

BORING LOCATION

GROUND SURFACE ELEV

DATE START 10-22-88

(

DAT

JATUM

EEND 10-23-98


DATE

10-22-98

10-22-98

CASING SIZE 5' OTHER 5" ODEX pneumatic hammer

OPTH

(FT)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

CASING

mnffl

1

1

1

1

2

5

4

4

3

3

2

1

2

2

1

3

4

2

3

4

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

SAMPLE

NO PEN/REC DEPTH (FT) BLOWS/6"

TIME

1330

1345

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION


Gray, fine to coarse SAND, some line to

coarse Gravel, little' Cobbles

Orange line to coarse SAND, some One to

coarse Gravel

271 BOTTOM OF BORING

WATER CASING

25 25

22 25

STRATUM

DESCRIPTION

GRAVELLY SANDS

STABILIZATION TIME

0

15MIN

EQUIPMENT

INSTALLED

Z

121

15-

Iff of

2"PVC

slotted

wen

screen

Grout

2-PVC

SoM

riser

Bent

Seal

F

L

T

E

R

S

A

N

D

FIELD

TESTING

R

K

•MARKS

1. Stratum descriptor!* are based on observations of or* cuttings.

NOTES 1 ) STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY BETWEEN SOIL TYPES: TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL.2) WATER LEVEL READINGS HAVE BEEN MADE AT TIMES AND UNDER CONDITIONS STATED. FLUCTUATIONS OF GROUNDWATER TABLEMAY OCCUR DUE TO OTHER FACTORS THAN THOSE PRESENT AT THE TIME MEASUREMENTS WERE MADE

GZA BORING NO GZ-4

>z\

mZDXin

APPENDIX E

LABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSISGROUNDWATER AND LEACHATE

M I T K E MCourouAi ION

GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.140 BroadwayProvidence, RI 02903Attn: Mr. Ed Summerly

iNOV 16 1998uavr7Lnu u

November 13, 1998

RE: Client Project #: 32090.4, Rosehill LandfillLab Project #: El788

Dear Mr. Summerly:

Enclosed please find the data report of the required analyses for the samples associatedwith the above referenced project. If you have any questions regarding this report, pleasecall me.

We appreciate your business.

Sine

Edward A. LawlerLaboratory Operations Manager

175 Metro Center Boulevard • Warwick, Rhode Island 02886-1755 • (401) 732-3400 • Fax (401) 732-3499email: [email protected]

M I T K E MC O K I ' O K M I O N

Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.

Client Project: 32090.4, Rosehill Landfill

Lab Project: E1788

Date samples received: 10/28/98

Project Narrative

This data report includes the analysis results for seven (7) aqueous sample that was receivedfrom GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. on October 28, 1998. Analyses were performed perspecification in the Chain of Custody form. For reference, a copy of the Mitkem Sample Log-In form is included for cross-referencing the client sample ID and laboratory sample ID.

All of the analyses were performed according to method specifications. No unusualoccurrences were noted during sample analysis.

This data report has been reviewed and is authorized for release as evidenced by the signaturebelow.

Edward A. LawlerLaboratory Operations Manager

001

INI I T K F M

COKI'OKATION

Analysis Report: Total Iron


Matrix: Aqueous

Analysis Method: 6010

Concentration in: mg/L

Analysis Date: 10/30/98

LabjQ Client ID Result

E1788-01

E1788-02

E1788-03

E1788-04

E1788-05

E1788-06

GZ-2

GZ-3

GZ-4

LS-2

LS-3

LS-4

0.7

ND

0.9

250

33

88

Reporting Limit 0.3

QA/QC.

Method Blank

1029PBW2 ND

Lab Control Sample (% Recovery)

1029LCSW2 108

ND = Not Detected

Page 1 of 1 E1788-Tiron

M I T K E MC'ORI'ORAIION

Analysis Report: Volatile Organic Compounds

Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID: GZ-2Lab ID: E1788-01Analysis: Method 8260

Analyte Results

Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1 -Dichloropropene N DBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND

Analysis Date: 11/2/98Matrix: AqueousConcentration in: ug/LDilution: 1

ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555

Page 1 of 2 E1788-01

003

Client ID: GZ-2

M 1 TK E MC O U I ' O R A I I O N

Lab ID: E1788-01

Analyte

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTetrachloroethene1,3-Dichloropropane2-HexanoneDibromochloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)Chlorobenzene1,1,1,2-TetrachloroethaneEthylbenzeneXylenes, totalStyreneBromoformIsopropylbenzeneBromobenzene1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,2,3-Trichloropropanen-Propylbenzene2-Chlorotoluene4-Chlorotoluene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzenesec-Butylbenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene4-lsopropyltoluene1,4-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichlorobenzenen-Butylbenzene1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadiene1,2,3-TrichlorobenzeneMTBENaphthalene

Surrogate Recovery:1,2-Dichloroethane-d4Toluene-d8Bromofluorobenzene

ND = Not Detected

Results

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND34ND

97%95%95%

Page 2 of 2

ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555555

QC Batch: V5B1102A

E1788-01

004

M IT K E MCORPORATION



Analyte Results

Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1 -Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1-Dichloropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND


ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555

Page 1 of 2 E1788-02

005

Client ID: GZ-3

M I T K E MCOIU'OU \TION

Lab ID: E1788-02

Analyte


Results

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555555

QC Batch: V5B1102A


ND = Not Detected

96%96%93%

Page 2 of 2 E1788-02

006

INI I T K E MCOKI'OU \TION



Analyte BesullS

Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1-Dichloropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND


ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555

Page 1 of 2 E1788-03

007

Client ID: GZ-4

M I T K E MCOKI'ORAIION

Lab ID: E1788-03

Analyte

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTetrach loroethene1,3-Dichloropropane2-HexanoneDibromochloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)Chlorobenzene1,1,1,2-TetrachloroethaneEthylbenzeneXylenes, totalStyreneBromoformI sopropy IbenzeneBromobenzene1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,2,3-Trichloropropanen-Propylbenzene2-Chlorotoluene4-Chlorotoluene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzenesec-Butylbenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene4-lsopropyltoluene1,4-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichlorobenzenen-Butylbenzene1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadiene1,2,3-TrichlorobenzeneMTBENaphthalene

Results


ReportingLimils

55555555555555555555555555555555555

QC Batch: V5B1102A


ND = Not Detected

95%97%94%

Page 2 of 2 E1788-03

008

M I T K E MCOIU'OK \TION


Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID: LS-2Lab ID: E1788-04Analysis. Method 8260

Analyte Results

Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1 -Dichloropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND


ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555

Page 1 of 2 E1788-04

009

Client ID: LS-2

M I T K E MCOKI'OKATION

Lab ID: E1788-04

Analyte


Results


ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555555

QC Batch: V5B1102A


ND = Not Detected

95%96%93%

Page 2 of 2 E1788-04

0 1 0

\I I T K E !\|CORPORATION


Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID: LS-3Lab ID: E1788-05Analysis: Method 8260

Analyte Results

Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1 -Dich loroethene N DCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dich loroethene N DMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1.1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1.1-Dich loropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND


ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555

Page 1 of 2 E1788-05

Oil

Client ID: LS-3

M I T K E . MCORPORATION

Lab ID: E1788-05

Analyte

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTetrachloroethene1,3-Dichloropropane2-HexanoneDibromochloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)Chlorobenzene1,1,1,2-TetrachloroethaneEthylbenzeneXylenes, totalStyreneBromoformIsopropylbenzeneBromobenzene1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,2,3-Trichloropropanen-Propylbenzene2-Chlorotoluene4-Chlorotoluene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzenesec-Butylbenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene4-I sopropy Itoluene1,4-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichlorobenzenen-Butylbenzene1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadiene1,2,3-TrichlorobenzeneMTBENaphthalene


ND = Not Detected

Results


99%97%93%

Page 2 of 2

ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555555

QC Batch: V5B1102A

E1788-05

Oli:

\I I T K E MCOWOK.VMON


Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID: LS-4Lab ID: E1788-06Analysis: Method 8260

Analyte Results

Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1-Dichloropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dich loropropene N D4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND


ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555

Page 1 of 2 E1788-06

013

Client ID: LS-4

iVI 1 T K £ MCOKI'OKVIION

Lab ID: E1788-06

Analyte



ND = Not Detected

Results


99%96%92%

Page 2 of 2

ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555555

QC Batch: V5B1102A

E1788-06

014

M I T K E M

CORPORATION


Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID: TBGW102898Lab ID: E1788-07Analysis: Method 8260

Analyte Results

Dichlorodifluoromethane NOChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1-Dichloropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND


ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555

Page 1 of 2 E1788-07

Client ID: TBGW102898

M I TK F. MCOKI'OK \TION

Lab ID: E1788-07

Analyte


Results


ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555555

QC Batch: V5B1102A


ND = Not Detected

94%95%93%

Page 2 of 2 E1788-07

M 1 T K E i\l

COKI'OKATION


Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID:Lab ID: Method Blank, V5B1102AAnalysis: Method 8260

Analyte Results

Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1 -Dichloropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND


ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555

Page 1 of 2 E1788-MB

n t rt.. 1 /

Client ID:

M 1 T K E MCoimw.vriON

Lab ID: Method Blank, V5B1102A

Analyte


Results


ReportingLimits

55555555555555555555555555555555555

QC Batch: V5B1102A


ND = Not Detected

99%96%93%

Page 2 of 2 E1788-MB

018

M I I K E M

CORI'OK VI ION

Analysis Report: Iron Bacteria


Matrix: Aqueous

Analysis Method: SM9240B

Analysis Date: 10/29/98

LabJD

E1788-04

E1788-05

E1788-06

Client ID

LS-2

LS-3

Result

Absent

Absent

Absent

O i f l

Page 1 of 1 E1788-Bacteria

Subcontracted

00£1-HVJ

-ttS

"2o•ao

OQ of

5 1«. ?;

<u9O

<

1.0

V)

sfc

o

<22T3V

UOCO.0

O

2o

T3

§

C!o

ooCio

OO

CJo

oo

ooCJo

000

OO

CJo

•o•oM

o

•8•o•oOJQ.e6.

i§

•21

ou

o

oo

§

o

o

oo

00§OOg\ooC}o

V~l

•*{

oo

oo§

O

OOOX

00

o

oo<N

OO

oo

o

4>•§

U

Ae

.H+•»08

•IUH BLl

o o <s\o so oo

•Itu GL,

O O

%£E ,s«> Ib Ou

Uo>

^^^ ^^^

o U 2 uJ2 u, o< 22

o o oO O <NVO vo 00

O O O— _ VOO O «NVO vo OO

o o o

— — VOO O <NVO VO OO

o o oO O (SVO >O 00

oVO(Noo

No

No

oooooo

No

oooooor-

(N00

oooo00

oooooo

c/o

VOooooooI—

oofNo

£O

r-oooooor-

020

0000

V)

2o

I.£>

(N

<N

oo

O

COWOOuUoz

uC

su

uB

o —•2 .•'too.b -j i-] i <

co Hvo

T°?

e«

Iu

C

OvOm<N •* •-'°. S

<° ° r^ <o

erly

Geo

Envi

Bro

adw

ayid

ence

,40

1-4

401-

r-~«

G Br vid

<^<L'sS2<g^u:021

dO

q

CDo

(0

a

a.

82

iO

U.

CLOo

gUI

101

6

8UJ

i

-^

1

CH

AIN

-OF-

CU

STO

DY

R

EC

OR

D

CO0 *

1-5 §K * O

^'T^cl ^n^S

.-ynci-^dr m

|piMiini«if /•) 6uu«i|ij

Q

r 8 d101

§ A^OHd

UJGC 10016 P0«l OS Hdlrn11

< SZ9

N8 r v r Hvd r tuza

i»d r sod r MM r

.*»

SIM

KM r oa»r

«n.»r

«< )»e,r

rzosr, r»zsr

"^^

n«H

puoon H^r

i .iiiii

Dat

e/Ti

me

(Ver

y Im

porta

nt)

fo

eci

>

^c

vS

c<en

1-o

OS1

^

Qc,

*

TV'

1I

\

^

3

c<

X

^

o

-^

T

3

*

X

X

V

5V/l

2 "

\

3

^

X.

K

>

3

m^~ —

1

0

^

X

X

X

V

•y

-V

J

-

X

V

a

io

0^£

\- | PR

ES

ER

VA

TIV

E

(Cl

• H

CI,

N -

HN

O,,

S •

H,S

O,,

Na

- N

aOH

, O

- O

ther

)'

| CO

NTA

INE

R T

YP

E

(P-P

last

lc,

G-Q

lass

, V

-Via

l, T-

Teflo

n, 0

-Oth

er)

'

ng li

mits

, kn

own

cont

amin

atio

n, e

tc3

have

bee

n pr

eser

ved

w/

1 1

HC

L )

. ->

- A

V

-»

-

ves,

spec

ial r

epor

tlo

ted,

all

VO

A v

ial

i ,

r\

MO

TES

Pre

serv

atU

nles

s ot

herw

ise

RE

LIN

QU

ISH

ED

BY

(A

ffilia

tion)

DA

TE

/TIM

E

RE

PB

IVE

D B

XH

Affi

hatio

n)

00U

* «&

.%,-

"*"te/^

O

L/J

L-^

F

2^^i0

^

?I/S

tf

** £*>

t.R

ELI

NQ

UIS

HE

D B

Y

(Affi

liatio

n)

DA

TE/T

IME

R

EC

EIV

dC"B

Y

(Affi

liatio

n)^

§'S

<r

RE

LIN

QU

ISH

ED

BY

(A

ffilia

tion)

DA

TE

/TIM

E

RE

CE

IVE

D B

Y (

•*»

V

SUs

TUR

NA

RO

UN

D T

IME

n S

tand

ard

n R

ush

Day

s, A

ppro

ved

hy

Oz

OO-

0(TO

UJ

^

cs

'dr

-J

.Jr0

i-

o_

M^^s

V]

V

of

-^

LOC

ATI

ON

$L

u.0

IsUJ

» -4-

£

1

o

1 P

RO

JEC

T M

AN

AG

ER

"-O

C

su

.n\m

ff \ y

tX

I

O to ro

GZ

A G

EOEN

VIRO

NMEN

TAL,

INC.

EN

GIN

EE

RS

AN

D S

CIE

NTIS

TS

140

Bro

adw

ayP

RO

VID

EN

CE

, R

l 029

03(4

01)4

21-4

140

FAX

(40

1) 7

51 -8

61 3

Last Page of Data Report

023

GZ\

"OtnZDX

APPENDIX F

LABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS - SOIL GAS

@AIR TOXICS LTD.AN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL LABORATORY

CLIENT:

PHONE:FAX:DATE RECEIVED:DATE COMPLETED:

WORK ORDER #: 9812162Work Order Summary

Mr. David CapacchioneGZA GeoEnvironmental140 BroadwayProvidence, RI 02903

401-421-4140401-751-861312/10/9812/23/98

BILL TO: Same

P.O. # NRPROJECT # 32090 Rosehill landfill

FRACTION #01A02A03A04A05A05B

NAMEG2SG (13-300C)G2SG (3-300)G2SG( 11+600)G2SG (11+500)Lab BlankLab Blank

TESTTO-14TO-14TO-14TO-14TO-14TO-14

RECEIPTVAC7PRES.

1.0 "Hg0.4 psi0.4 psi5.0 "Hg

NANA

LAB NARRATIVE:Compounds detected between the detection limit and the low point on the curve are "J" flagged.

CERTIFIED BY: DATE:Laboratory Director

Certification numbers: CA ELAP - 1149, NY ELAP - 11291, UT ELAP - E-217

180 BLUE RAVINE ROAD, SUITE B FOLSOM, CA 95630(916) 985-1000 • (800) 985-5955 . FAX (916) 985-1020

Page 1

AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME: G2SG(13-300C)

ID#: 9812162-01A

EPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan

Compound

Freon 12Freon 1 1 4ChloromethaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethaneChloroethaneFreon 1 11 ,1 -DichloroetheneFreon 1 1 3Methylene Chloride1,1-Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1,1,1 -TnchloroethaneCarbon TetrachlondeBenzene1 ,2-DichloroethaneTnchloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneToluenetrans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene1 ,1 ,2-TnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneEthylene DibromideChlorobenzeneEthyl Benzenem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneStyrene1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,3,5-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorotoluene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2,4-TnchlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadienePropylene1 ,3-ButadieneAcetoneCarbon Disulfide2-Propanoltrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene

Det. Limit (ppbv)

8.78.78.78.78.78.78.78.78.78787878.78.78.78.787878.7878.78.78.78.78.78.78787878.78.78787878787878.78.7353535353535

Amount (ppbv)

17J28 J

Not Detected450

Not Detected180

Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

48Not DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

130Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

1200Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

9502600390

Not DetectedNot Detected

130180

Not Detected16J

Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

50 JNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

Page 2

AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME: G2SG(13-300C)

ID#: 9812162-01AEPA METHOD TO-14 GC7MS Full Scan

Compound Pet. Umlt (ppbv)

J = Estimated value.Q = Exceeds Quality Control limits of 70% to 130%, due to matrix effects.Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister

Amount (ppbv)

Vinyl Acetate2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)HexaneTetrahydrofuranCyclohexane1 ,4-DioxaneBromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-pentanone2-HexanoneDibromochloromethaneBromoform4-EthyltolueneEthanolMethyl tert-Butyl EtherHeptane

353535353535353535353535353535


2400Not Detected

720Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

260Not DetectedNot Detected

670

SurrogatesOctafluorotolueneToluene-d84-Bromofluorobenzene

% Recovery8199

157 Q

Method Limits70-13070-13070-130

Page 3

AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME: G2SG(3-300)

ID#: 9812162-02A


CompoundFreon 12Freon 114ChloromethaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethaneChloroethaneFreon 1 11,1-DichloroetheneFreon 113Methylene Chlonde1,1-Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1,1,1 -TnchloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBenzene1 ,2-DichloroethaneTnchloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneToluenetrans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene1 ,1 ,2-TnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneEthylene DibromideChlorobenzeneEthyl Benzenem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneStyrene1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,3,5-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorotoluene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2,4-TnchlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadienePropylene1 ,3-ButadieneAcetoneCarbon Disulfide2-Propanoltrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene

Det. Limit (ppbv)878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787353535353535

Amount (ppbv)13048

Not Detected74

Not Detected150

Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

10J270

Not DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

250Not Detected

28 JNot DetectedNot Detected


290038001100

Not Detected27 J110280

Not Detected22J

Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

9646 J


Page 4

AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME: G2SG(3-300)

ID#: 9812162-02A


Compound Pet. Limit (ppbv)

J = Estimated value.Q = Exceeds Quality Control limits of 70% to 130%, due to matrix effects.Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister

Amount (ppbv)


353535353535353535353535353535


890Not Detected


250Not DetectedNot Detected

1200

Surrogates % Recovery Method LimitsOctafluorotolueneToluene-d84-Bromofluorobenzene

7998

150 Q

70-13070-13070-130

Page 5

AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME : G2SG(11+600)

H)#: 9812162-03AEPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan

Compound Pet. Limit (ppbv) Amount (ppbv)Freon 12Freon 1 1 4ChloromethaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethaneChloroethaneFreon 1 11 , 1 -DichloroetheneFreon 1 1 3Methylene Chloride1 ,1-Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1,1,1 -TnchloroethaneCarbon TetrachlondeBenzene1 ,2-DichloroethaneTnchloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneToluenetrans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene1 ,1 ,2-TnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneEthylene DibromideChlorobenzeneEthyl Benzenem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneStyrene1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,3,5-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorotoluene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2,4-TnchlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadienePropylene1 ,3-ButadieneAcetoneCarbon Disulfide2-Propanoltrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene

650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500260002600026000260002600026000

Not DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected


7900 JNot Detected

11000JNot Detected


13000JNot DetectedNot Detected

22000 JNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

8100JNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

71000Not Detected

Page 6

AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME: G2SG(11+600)

ID#: 9812162-03A


Compound


Det. Limit (ppbv)

260002600026000260002600026000260002600026000260002600026000260002600026000

Amount (ppbv)

Not DelectedNot DetectedNot Detected

28000Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

55000 JNot DetectedNot Detected

J = Estimated valueContainer Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister


% Recovery9010184

Method Limits70-13070-13070-130

Page 7


ID#: 9812162-04AEPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan

CompoundFreon 12Freon 1 1 4ChloromethaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethaneChloroethaneFreon 1 11,1-DichloroetheneFreon 113Methylene Chlonde1 , 1 -Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1,1,1 -TnchloroethaneCarbon TetrachlondeBenzene1,2-DichloroethaneTrichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneToluenetrans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene1 ,1 ,2-TnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneEthylene DibromideChlorobenzeneEthyl Benzenem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneStyrene1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,3,5-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorotoluene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2,4-TnchlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadienePropylene1 ,3-ButadieneAcetoneCarbon Disulfide2-Propanoltrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene

Det. Limit (ppbv)540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400210002100021000210002100021000

Amount (ppbv)Not DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected


9400 JNot Detected

13000JNot Detected


15000JNot DetectedNot Detected


9800 JNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

Page 8


ID#: 9812162-04A


Compound


Det. Limit (ppbv)

210002100021000210002100021000210002100021000210002100021000210002100021000

Amount (ppbv)

Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

J = Estimated valueContainer Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister


% Recovery8910085

Method Limits70-13070-13070-130

Page 9

AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME : Lab Blank

ID#: 9812162-05A


CompoundFreon 12Freon 114ChloromethaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethaneChloroethaneFreon 1 11 ,1 -DichloroetheneFreon 113Methylene Chlonde1,1-Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1 ,1 ,1 -TnchloroethaneCarbon TetrachlondeBenzene1,2-DichloroethaneTnchloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneToluenetrans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene1,1 ,2-TnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneEthylene DibromideChlorobenzeneEthyl Benzenem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneStyrene1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,3,5-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorotoluene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2,4-TnchlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadienePropylene1 ,3-ButadieneAcetoneCarbon Disulfide2-Propanoltrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene

Det. Limit (ppbv)0.500.500.500500.500.500.500.500500.500500500500500500500500.500.500.500.500.500500.500500.500500500500.500500500500.500.500500.500.500502.0202020202.0

Amount (ppbv)Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

Page 10


ID#: 9812162-05A


Compound


Del. Limit (ppbv)

202.02.02.02.02.02.02.0202.02.02.02.0202.0

Amount (ppbv)


Container Type: NA


% Recovery779495

Method Limits70-13070-13070-130

Page 11


ID#: 9812162-05B


Compound Pet. Limit (ppbv) Amount (ppbv)Freon 12Freon 114ChloromethaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethaneChloroethaneFreon 1 11,1-DichloroetheneFreon 113Methylene Chlonde1,1-Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1,1,1 -TnchloroethaneCarbon TetrachlondeBenzene1 ,2-DichloroethaneTnchloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneToluenetrans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene1 ,1 ,2-TnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneEthylene DibromideChlorobenzeneEthyl Benzenem.p-Xyleneo-XyleneStyrene1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,3,5-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorotoluene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2,4-TnchlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadienePropylene1 ,3-ButadieneAcetoneCarbon Disulfide2-Propanoltrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene

0500500500.500.500.500.500.500500500.500500500500500500500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500500.50050050050050050050050050050050050050050202020202020

Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected

Page 12


ID#: 9812162-05B


Illllillll ^Compound


Det. Limit (ppbv)

2.02.02.02.02.02.0202.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0

Amount (ppbv)


Container Type: NA

Surrogates % Recovery Method LimitsOctafluorotolueneToluene-d84-Bromofluorobenzene

9510391

70-13070-13070-130

Page 13

oto gUJ Vt £=? oo~ o

Q

H

C/5U

OH

HCDD)COo.

•DC

1<C

D

"*

U:

CD

CO

o q "g" 'oa. CL CL CL

v)S-

co

g.Kl <*\

^2

CO

40

1

By:

Sig

CDCL >

O S SCO f^ QJ

c E -D o =O O T3 ^ OO O < O. O

lecte

d

1

'c «

<5i

T3

CO

crCD

CCcooCO

16

CDEi-08OJCOQ

.CDQ.ECO

CO5CD

¥

O

acv\

o

o

o

Uvi

Saro

l^t7

V)

Vv

!CM

0)O

X,

cv

CN

S0^£ NJ&

V

superfundsite field investigation report

Documents