supplemental subsurface investigation report
TRANSCRIPT
SUPPLEMENTAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT
Property:
TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01‐399 19740 Viking Avenue Northwest Poulsbo, Washington
Ecology Facility ID: 68211258
Report Date:
December 30, 2013
DRAFT – ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW
Prepared for:
TOC Holdings Co. 2737 West Commodore Way Seattle, Washington
P:\0440 TOC Holdings Co\01‐399 Poulsbo\Deliverables\2013\SSI\01‐399_2013SSIReport_DFCR.docx
Supplemental Subsurface Investigation Report
Prepared for:
TOC Holdings Co. 2737 West Commodore Way Seattle, Washington 98199
Property:
TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01‐399 19740 Viking Avenue Northwest Poulsbo, Washington 98370
Ecology Facility ID: 68211258
Project No.: 0440‐038
Prepared by:
DRAFT __________________ Elizabeth Forbes Staff Geologist
Reviewed by:
DRAFT ___________________ Ryan K. Bixby LG #1691 President
December 30, 2013
Draft – Issue for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND .................................................................... 1
3.0 PROPERTY GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY ...................................................................... 2
4.0 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND INTERIM REMEDIAL ACTIONS ......................................... 2
5.0 2013 SUPPLEMENTAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION .......................................................... 3
5.1 SOIL BORING PLACEMENT ............................................................................................ 4
5.2 DRILLING ....................................................................................................................... 4
5.3 SAMPLE COLLECTION ................................................................................................... 5
5.4 MANAGEMENT OF INVESTIGATIVE DERIVED WASTE ................................................... 5
5.5 ANALYTICAL RESULTS ................................................................................................... 5
6.0 DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................................... 6
7.0 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................... 6
8.0 LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 6
9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................... 7
FIGURES
1 Property Location Map
2 Exploration Location Plan
3 Historical Soil Analytical Results for Samples Exceeding MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels
4 2013 Confirmational Soil Analytical Results
TABLE
1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results
APPENDICES
A Boring Logs
B Laboratory Analytical Reports Friedman and Bruya, Inc. #306184
Friedman and Bruya, Inc. #306185 Friedman and Bruya, Inc. #306186
Supplemental Subsurface Investigation Report Draft – Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. (SoundEarth, formerly Sound Environmental Strategies Corporation [SES]) has prepared this report for TOC Holdings Co. to document the results of the supplemental subsurface investigation (SSI) activities conducted by SoundEarth on June 10, 11, and 12, 2013, at the TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01‐399, located at 19740 Viking Avenue Northwest in Poulsbo, Washington (the Property). The Property location is shown on Figure 1. Property features are depicted on Figure 2.
According to Washington State Department of Ecology’s Guidelines for Property Cleanups Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program, dated July 2008, a “site” is defined by the nature and extent of contamination associated with one or more releases of hazardous substances prior to any cleanup of that contamination. Based on this definition of a site and that provided in Chapter 173‐340 of Section 200 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC 173‐340‐200), the TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01‐399 site (the Site) includes the full lateral and vertical extent of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination that resulted from the former operation of a retail gasoline service station on the Property. Based on the information gathered to date, the Site appears to include petroleum‐contaminated soil and groundwater beneath the central and southern portions of the Property, and beneath a portion of the adjacent Northwest Liberty Road right‐of‐way.
The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the current soil conditions beneath the Property in areas where petroleum‐contaminated soil (PCS) had been encountered following the excavations performed in 2005 and before the remediation system that operated on the Property between 2008 and 2012 was turned off (Figure 3, Table 1). The work summarized in this report was performed in accordance with the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Cleanup Regulation, as established in WAC 173‐340, revised November 2007.
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The Property includes a single irregularly shaped tax parcel (Kitsap County parcel number 1526014‐017‐2001) that covers approximately 17,250 square feet (0.42 acres) of land. The Property is listed as 19740 Viking Avenue Northwest, Poulsbo, Washington, and is located approximately 1 mile northwest of downtown Poulsbo, Washington (Figure 1).
The Property is currently occupied by Silver City Tattoo and Helter Skelter Lounge, which operate out of the 1986‐vintage convenience store building. Additional improvements on the Property include an asphalt parking lot and perimeter landscaping (Figure 2).
According to historical records, a retail gasoline station was installed at the Property between 1970 and 1975 and consisted of three underground storage tanks (USTs) with capacities ranging from 6,000 to 12,000 gallons, two double fuel‐dispensing pump islands, and four single fuel‐dispensing pump islands. A mobile home used for the retail gasoline station was located on the Property until 1977, when a modular building was constructed in its place. In 1986, the modular building was demolished and replaced with the extant convenience store building. The operation of the Property as a retail gasoline station ceased in 2005, and the UST system was removed from the Property in April 2005. TOC Holdings Co. sold the Property in August 2007 to Silver City Viking Investment, Inc.
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
3.0 PROPERTY GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
According to the geologic map of the region (DNR 2005), the Property and vicinity are underlain by Quaternary glacial till (unit Qgt). The Property is located above the Poulsbo Aquifer, which is positioned within the geologic unit Qgt at depths between 20 and 42 feet below ground surface (bgs; Kitsap County 1997). Soil encountered during drilling activities conducted by SoundEarth indicated that the Property is underlain by glacial till consisting of very dense, fine‐ to coarse‐grained interbedded silty sand to sand to 45 feet bgs, the maximum depth explored during previous investigations. An approximately 3‐foot‐thick, hard, gray silt unit was encountered beneath the silty sand/sand unit in several soil borings. Fill material, consisting of medium dense, fine‐ to coarse‐grained silty sand with fine to coarse gravel, is present within the former excavation areas to an approximate depth of 26 feet bgs.
Groundwater has been encountered beneath the Site at depths ranging from approximately 24 to 35 feet below the top of the monitoring well casings. The groundwater flow direction has consistently been toward the east‐southeast with a gradient ranging from 0.044 to 0.12 feet per foot.
4.0 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND INTERIM REMEDIAL ACTIONS
Subsurface investigations conducted between 2005 and 2013 by SoundEarth confirmed that the operation of the former UST system resulted in adverse environmental impacts to soil and groundwater. Laboratory analytical data indicated that concentrations of gasoline‐range petroleum hydrocarbons (GRPH); benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX); and naphthalene exceeded their respective MTCA Method A cleanup levels (cleanup levels) in soil and groundwater beneath the Site. Elevated concentrations of total lead have also been detected in groundwater samples collected from the Site; however, the concentrations of total lead are not considered to be associated with a release of petroleum hydrocarbons and are likely a result of turbidity in the groundwater samples. Naphthalene was not detected at concentrations exceeding the applicable cleanup level in any of the groundwater samples collected over the course of four or more consecutive quarters between 2009 and 2010 and was subsequently removed from the groundwater sampling and analysis plan.
In April 2005, SoundEarth oversaw the removal of the three existing USTs, two pump islands, associated product lines, and PCS from the Property. Two discrete excavations were completed in the vicinity of the USTs and pump islands. Soil was excavated to a total depth of 12 feet bgs in the UST excavation and 26 feet bgs in the pump island excavation. Soil samples collected from the final limits of the UST excavation did not contain concentrations of GRPH or BTEX exceeding cleanup levels, confirming that the PCS in the vicinity of the USTs was successfully removed. Soil samples collected from the final limits of the pump island excavation contained concentrations of GRPH, BTEX constituents, and/or naphthalene exceeding their applicable MTCA Method A cleanup levels. PCS stockpiled from the UST excavation was disposed of off‐Site at a regulated treatment facility. The pump island excavation was backfilled with stockpiled soil from the excavation.
In an effort to mitigate the residual soil and groundwater contamination at the Property, a remediation system that incorporates soil vapor extraction (SVE), groundwater circulation, and air sparge technologies was installed at the Property in 2008. The SVE component of the remediation system consists of six vacuum extraction wells (MW09, MW11, MW13, MW14, MW21, and MW22) that apply a vacuum to the vadose zone to induce air flow and enhance recovery of volatile organic contaminants from the soil. The groundwater circulation and SVE components of the remediation system are installed in
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
four wells (MW11, MW14, MW21, and MW22) and air sparging is performed in two wells (AS01 and AS02) in an effort to remove volatile organic contaminants and increase the dissolved oxygen content of groundwater. Elevated concentrations of GRPH and benzene were detected in the vapors extracted from the subsurface following system startup, indicating that the remediation system was successfully removing concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons from the subsurface. Acknowledging the reduction in contaminant concentrations observed throughout the Site, the remediation system was turned off on August 14, 2012, to allow for compliance groundwater monitoring.
In May 2012, a limited in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) event was conducted at the Property in an effort to reduce residual soil and groundwater contamination observed in boring/monitoring well MW20. Approximately 275 gallons of hydrogen peroxide‐activated sodium persulfate solution were injected into monitoring well MW20. The results of subsequent compliance groundwater monitoring indicated that the ISCO event effectively reduced contaminant concentrations in monitoring well MW20.
The locations of soil borings, monitoring wells, and other Property features are shown on Figure 2. Soil analytical results are summarized in Figures 3 and in Table 1. For evaluation purposes, those concentrations of chemicals of concern (COCs) that exceed the current cleanup levels for soil are presented in bold red font in the figures and tables. A detailed summary of each previous investigation and interim action and their findings and conclusions, as well as the documentation of the field work including lab reports and boring logs, are presented in the Remedial Investigation Report (SES 2009).
5.0 2013 SUPPLEMENTAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
This section describes the pre‐field and subsequent field activities conducted by SoundEarth on June 10, 11, and 12, 2013, and on November 18 and 19, 2013, to meet the objective of the SSI. The scope of work included the following:
Reviewing existing Property soil data to develop a work plan that would include details regarding the boring locations and sample intervals.
Preparing a health and safety plan in accordance with MTCA and Part 1910.120 of Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations before initiating field activities.
Performing a utility locate at the proposed boring locations using a private utility location service and by contacting the One‐Call Center for public utility location.
Overseeing the advancement of ten soil borings (B21 through B28, B30, and B31) on the Property in areas where soil contamination was identified following the UST and pump island excavations in 2005 and before the remediation system was turned off in 2012. Boring B29, which was planned to be advanced in the vicinity of boring B17/MW20, could not be drilled due to the presence of overhead power lines; boring B29 was therefore eliminated as a boring location and later replaced with boring B31.
Overseeing the installation of two additional AS remediation wells (AS03 and AS04) to treat dissolved‐phase contamination and residual soil contamination in the vicinity of boring B23.
Describing subsurface soil conditions, screening soil collected from the borings for evidence of petroleum contamination, and submitting selected soil samples for laboratory analysis.
Preparing this report.
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
A detailed description of the investigation activities is provided in Sections 5.1 through 5.5 below.
5.1 SOIL BORING PLACEMENT
Each soil boring advanced during the 2013 SSI was situated near locations where PCS was historically encountered. Below is a list of the historical soil sample locations and the depths where PCS exceeding MTCA Method A cleanup levels was previously encountered at the Site, as well as the 2013 SSI borings used to characterize current soil conditions in their vicinities:
Boring B21 was advanced north of the former pump islands, in the vicinity of boring B01/MW04 and excavation soil sample PIE2‐2, where PCS was encountered at depths between 18 and 20 feet bgs.
Boring B22 was advanced below the former pump islands, in the vicinity of boring B11/MW15 and excavation soil sample PIE2‐3, where PCS was encountered at depths between 15 and 30 feet bgs.
Boring B23 was advanced in the vicinity of boring B05/MW09 and excavation soil samples PIE2‐1 and PIE2‐9, where PCS was encountered at depths between 10 and 35 feet bgs.
Boring B24 was advanced in the vicinity of boring B07/MW11 and excavation soil sample PIE2‐8, where PCS was encountered at depths between 15 and 17.5 feet bgs.
Boring B25 was advanced in the vicinity of excavation soil sample PIE2‐6, where PCS was encountered at a depth of 18 feet bgs.
Boring B26 was advanced in the vicinity of boring MW02, where PCS was encountered at a depth of 35 feet bgs.
Boring B27 was advanced in the vicinity of borings AS01 and B16/MW21, where PCS was encountered at depths between 28.5 and 40 feet bgs.
Boring B28 was advanced in the vicinity of boring B10/MW14, where PCS was encountered at a depth of 27.5 feet bgs.
B29, which was planned to be advanced in the vicinity of boring B17/MW20, could not be drilled due to the presence of overhead power lines.
Boring B30 was advanced in the vicinity of borings B08/MW12 and B06/MW10, where PCS was encountered at depths between 25 and 32 feet bgs.
Boring B31 was advanced in the vicinity of boring B17/MW20, where PCS was encountered at a depth of 20 feet bgs.
5.2 DRILLING
On June 10, 11, and 12, 2013, nine soil borings (B21 through B28, and B30) were advanced on the Property using a hollow‐stem auger drill rig. Cascade Drilling, L.P. of Woodinville, Washington, performed the drilling. Locations of the June 2013 SSI borings are shown on Figure 2. On November 18 and 19, 2013, three additional soil borings (B31, AS03, and AS04) were advanced on the Property using a hollow‐stem auger drill rig. Cascade Drilling, L.P. of Woodinville, Washington, performed the drilling. Locations of the November 2013 SSI borings are shown on Figure 2. Borings AS03 and AS04 were converted to 2‐inch diameter air sparge wells to depths of 37 and 39.5 feet bgs, respectively. Both air
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
sparge wells were completed with approximately 1 foot of 0.010‐inch screen and will be used to augment the existing remediation system on the Property.
Soil samples were collected from the soil borings at 5‐foot sample intervals to the maximum depth explored of 45.5 feet below bgs using a split‐spoon sampler advanced through the hollow‐stem auger and a 300‐pound hammer. Additional soil samples were collected at predetermined discrete depths based on previously collected soil data. Blow counts and sample recovery were recorded at each sample interval. The soil samples were described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Soil characteristics, including moisture content, relative density, texture, and color, were recorded on the boring logs, which are provided as Appendix A. The depths at which changes in soil texture were observed and where groundwater was first encountered are also included in the boring logs. The soil borings were backfilled with bentonite and capped with concrete upon completion of drilling.
5.3 SAMPLE COLLECTION
Soil samples were screened in the field for potential evidence of contamination using visual observations, notations of odor, and by conducting headspace analysis using a photoionization detector (PID) to detect the presence of volatile organic vapors. Headspace analysis was conducted by placing soil from each sample interval into a resealable plastic bag and allowing the sample to warm for a minimum of 30 seconds. The probe of the PID was then inserted into the bag, and the highest reading obtained over an approximately 30‐second interval was recorded. The USCS symbol, visual and olfactory notations for the samples, and PID readings were recorded on boring log forms, which are provided as Appendix A.
Selected soil samples were collected from each boring and were transferred directly into laboratory‐prepared sample containers. Soil samples to be analyzed for low‐level volatile organic compounds were collected in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 5035A. Sample containers were labeled with a unique sample identification and placed in an iced cooler. The soil samples were submitted to Friedman & Bruya, Inc. of Seattle, Washington, under standard chain‐of‐custody protocols for laboratory analysis. Selected soil samples were analyzed for GRPH by Northwest Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (NWTPH) Method NWTPH‐Gx, and BTEX by EPA Method 8021B. A soil sample collected from boring B21 at 18 feet bgs was also submitted for analysis of naphthalene by EPA Method 8260C.
5.4 MANAGEMENT OF INVESTIGATIVE DERIVED WASTE
Non‐dedicated field sampling equipment was cleaned and decontaminated between uses and prior to leaving the Property. Soil cuttings and decontamination wash water were contained on the Property in labeled 55‐gallon drums pending waste profiling and proper disposal.
5.5 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Analytical results for soil samples collected during the 2013 SSI are presented on Figure 4 and in Table 1. Laboratory analytical reports are included as Appendix B. A summary of the soil analytical results from the 2013 SSI is provided below:
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
Soil collected from boring B23, which was advanced within the former excavation area near the former pump islands, contained a concentration of GRPH exceeding the applicable MTCA cleanup level at a depth of approximately 26 feet bgs.
Concentrations of GRPH and BTEX were not detected at concentrations exceeding their respective laboratory reporting limits and/or cleanup levels in any of the other soil samples collected from soil borings B21 through B28, B30, or B31.
6.0 DISCUSSION
GRPH and BTEX were not detected at concentrations exceeding their respective cleanup levels in soil samples collected from borings B21, B22, B24 through B28, B30, or B31, which were advanced within and southeast of the former excavation area. Concentrations of GRPH and BTEX were greatly reduced in soil samples collected from the 2013 borings when compared with the historical samples located in the same areas. These data therefore suggest that the operation of a remedial system between 2008 and 2012 effectively treated soil in these areas.
The GRPH and BTEX concentrations detected in sample B23‐26 confirms that some residual contamination remains in the native soil along the northeast area of the former excavation, at a depth of approximately 26 feet. The boring log for B23 indicates that the PCS is located within the saturated zone. Water was encountered in borings during drilling activities between depths of approximately 20 to 30 feet bgs. PCS was not encountered in any of the samples collected from above the zone of saturation or within 15 feet of the ground surface.
7.0 CONCLUSION
SoundEarth operated a remediation system on the Property between 2008 and 2012 in an effort to treat residual soil and groundwater contamination beneath the Property. The system was shut down once vapor recovery rates reached asymptotic levels and the system no longer appeared to be removing petroleum hydrocarbons from the subsurface. The current investigation involved the collection of soil from areas of the Property where PCS was previously encountered to evaluate whether the operation of the remediation system resulted in the Site being compliant with MTCA Method A cleanup criteria.
The results of the supplemental subsurface investigation demonstrate that the operation of a remedial system effectively treated soil beneath all but one area of the Property. Residual impacts encountered in boring B23 at a depth of 26 feet bgs are situated within the saturated zone and well below 15 feet bgs, the standard point of compliance for soil cleanup levels based on human exposure via direct contact. Acknowledging these findings, the soil impacts previously encountered within the upper 15.5 feet of the Property have been successfully remediated and no additional investigation or remediation of soil beneath the Property is warranted. SoundEarth will conduct additional remediation efforts, as necessary, to address residual groundwater impacts beneath the Site, and will collect confirmational groundwater samples on a quarterly basis until a minimum of four quarter of compliant results are achieved.
8.0 LIMITATIONS
The services described in this report were performed consistent with generally accepted professional consulting principles and practices. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. These services were
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
performed consistent with our agreement with our client. This report is solely for the use and information of our client unless otherwise noted. Any reliance on this report by a third party is at such party’s sole risk.
Opinions and recommendations contained in this report apply to conditions existing when services were performed and are intended only for the client, purposes, locations, time frames, and project parameters indicated. We are not responsible for the impacts of any changes in environmental standards, practices, or regulations subsequent to performance of services. We do not warrant the accuracy of information supplied by others, or the use of segregated portions of this report.
9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Kitsap County. 1997. Kitsap County Initial Basin Assessment. Reviewed online at <http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/oftr9704.html>. Reviewed May 29.
Sound Environmental Strategies. (SES). 2009. Remedial Investigation Report, TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01‐399, 19740 Viking Avenue Northwest, Poulsbo, Washington. March 21.
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. (SoundEarth). 2013. Groundwater Monitoring Report, Second Quarter 2013, TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01‐399, 19740 Viking Avenue Northwest, Poulsbo, Washington. April 17.
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). 2008. Guidelines for Property Cleanups Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program. Publication 08-09-044. July.
Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR). 2005. Kitsap County, Washington Geologic Map Units (portion of the Geology of Washington State map). Open File Report 2005‐3. December. Reviewed online at <http://www.kitsapgov.com/dcd/gis/maps/ Standard_Maps/Environmental/Quartenary_Geology_Nov2007.pdf>.
Draft – Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
FIGURES
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
TABLE
Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
TOC Holdings Co. Facility 01‐399
19740 Viking Avenue Northwest
Poulsbo, Washington
Draft ‐ Issued for Client Review
GRPH(1) DRPH(2) ORPH(2) Benzene(3) Toluene(3) Ethylbenzene(3)Total
Xylenes(3) MTBE(4) EDB(4) EDC(4) Naphthalene(4)Total
Lead(5)
SP‐1 04/20/05 ‐‐ <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
SP‐2 04/20/05 ‐‐ <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
SP‐3 04/20/05 ‐‐ <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Stockpile #2 SP‐4 04/20/05 ‐‐ 6 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 0.14 0.08 0.84 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Stockpile #3 SP‐5 04/20/05 ‐‐ 510 110x ‐‐ 0.02 6.4 7.8 66 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
T‐1 04/20/05 12 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
T‐2 04/20/05 11 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
T‐3 04/20/05 11 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
T‐4 04/20/05 12 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
T‐5 04/20/05 11 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
T‐6 04/20/05 12 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
T‐7 04/20/05 11 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
PI‐1 04/20/05 5 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
PI‐2 04/20/05 5 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
PL‐1 04/20/05 5 <1 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
PIE2‐1 04/22/05 18 130 <50 ‐‐ 0.18 2.0 1.2 8.9 <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 2.3 2
PIE2‐2 04/22/05 18 4,600 430x ‐‐ 34 230 74 490 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 15 <2
PIE2‐3 04/22/05 15 150 140x ‐‐ 0.26 6.6 2.5 19 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 3.3 <2
PIE2‐4 04/22/05 18 <2 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 0.06 <0.02 0.07 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
PIE2‐5 04/22/05 15 16 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 0.14 0.14 0.95 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
PIE2‐6 04/22/05 18 2 <50 ‐‐ 0.08 0.22 0.05 0.23 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <2
PIE2‐7 04/22/05 15 <2 <50 ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
PIE2‐8 04/22/05 15 3,500 480x ‐‐ 14 50 79 420 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 7.4 <2
PIE2‐9 04/22/05 26 1,600 250x ‐‐ 5.7 110 36 190 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 2.4 <2
MW01 MW‐1‐30 11/08/05 30 <4.88 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0319 <0.0531 <0.0531 <0.106 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.00
MW‐2‐19 19 <5.89 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0346 <0.0577 <0.0577 <0.115 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.15
MW‐2‐35 35 <3.86 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.103 0.132 0.106 0.588 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.16
MW‐3‐30 30 <5.68 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0312 <0.0520 <0.0520 <0.104 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.18
MW‐3‐40 40 <5.49 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0619 <0.103 <0.103 <0.206 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.988
B‐1‐20 20 11.8 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.10 1.40 0.327 1.90 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.59
B‐1‐21 21 <5.90 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0337 <0.0562 <0.0562 <0.112 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.67
B‐1‐30.5 30.5 <4.93 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0349 <0.0582 <0.0582 <0.116 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.47
MW‐5‐15 15 <5.42 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0303 <0.0504 <0.0504 <0.101 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.95
MW‐5‐30 30 <4.84 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.0316 <0.0527 <0.0527 <0.105 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.27
B02‐27 27 <4.51 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.27 <0.46 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.18
B02‐32 32 <4.39 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.33
B02‐40 40 <4.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.07 <0.07 <0.22 <0.36 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 0.935
B03‐25 25 <4.29 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.10 <0.10 <0.29 <0.49 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.15
B03‐33 33 <3.80 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.28 <0.47 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.21
B03‐40 40 <4.25 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.28 <0.47 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 0.980
B04‐25 25 <4.54 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.27 <0.45 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.55
B04‐35 35 <4.65 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 2.13
B04‐40 40 <3.81 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.07 <0.07 <0.21 <0.36 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.40
B05‐10 10 3,510 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.68 49 38 310 <4.3 <0.43 <0.43 ‐‐ 1.55
B05‐25 25 976 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.48 8.3 3.9 27 <0.44 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.08
B05‐35 35 13.9 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.07 0.47 0.17 1.0 <0.40 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.34
B06‐25 25 12.3 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.37 0.84 0.10 0.61 <0.46 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.22
B06‐32 32 1,110 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.0 5.7 16 92 <0.89 <0.09 <0.09 ‐‐ 1.40
B06‐40 40 <4.72 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.10 <0.10 <0.29 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.52
B‐07‐17.5 17.5 862 <10.7 <26.8 0.23 20 17 100 <0.46 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.15
B‐07‐28 28 <4.38 <11.8 <29.4 0.03 <0.09 <0.09 <0.26 <0.44 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.28
B‐07‐42.5 42.5 <4.05 <11.5 <28.8 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.24 <0.41 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 3.27
B‐08‐22.5 22.5 <3.88 <10.9 <27.3 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.23 <0.39 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.34
B‐08‐27 27 <4.34 <11.6 <28.9 0.08 <0.09 <0.09 <0.26 <0.43 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.19
B‐08‐36 36 <4.19 <11.9 <29.8 0.03 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.05
B‐09‐25 25 <4.49 <11.3 <28.3 <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.27 <0.45 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.35
B‐09‐35 35 <4.75 <12.0 <29.9 <0.02 <0.10 <0.10 <0.29 <0.48 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.00
B‐09‐40 40 <4.54 <12.4 <30.9 <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.27 <0.45 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 0.922
B‐10‐20 20 5.21 <11.2 <28.1 <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.26 <0.44 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.47
B‐10‐27.5 27.5 10.8 <11.8 <29.4 0.17 0.10 0.35 2.5 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.41
B‐10‐40 40 <4.15 <10.9 <27.2 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 2.43
30/100(7) 2,000 2,000 0.03 7 6 9 0.1 0.005 NE 5 250
Analytical Results (mg/kg)
B07/MW11
B08/MW12
B09/MW13
B10/MW14
Stockpile #1
Pump Islands/
Product Lines
Sample
Depth
(bgs)
Sample
Date
Sample
Identification
Sample
Location
B06/MW10
UST Excavation
11/07/05
MW02
MW03
B01/MW04
Pump Island
Excavation
MW05
B02/MW06
B03/MW07
11/07/05
11/07/05
03/13/06
11/08/05
09/25/06
09/25/06
03/13/06
MTCA Method A Cleanup Level for Soil(6)
03/13/06
03/14/06
03/14/06
B04/MW08
B05/MW09
09/26/06
09/26/06
P:\0440 TOC Holdings Co\01‐399 Poulsbo\Technical\Tables\2013\SSI\01‐399_2013SSI_SD_DFCR.xlsx 1 of 3
Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
TOC Holdings Co. Facility 01‐399
19740 Viking Avenue Northwest
Poulsbo, Washington
Draft ‐ Issued for Client Review
GRPH(1) DRPH(2) ORPH(2) Benzene(3) Toluene(3) Ethylbenzene(3)Total
Xylenes(3) MTBE(4) EDB(4) EDC(4) Naphthalene(4)Total
Lead(5)
Analytical Results (mg/kg)Sample
Depth
(bgs)
Sample
Date
Sample
Identification
Sample
Location
B‐11‐20 20 <3.98 <11.3 <28.3 0.14 0.16 <0.08 0.28 <0.40 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.41
B‐11‐30 30 528E <11.2 <28.1 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 0.949
B‐11‐37.5 37.5 <3.82 <10.5 <26.3 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.23 <0.38 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.92
B‐12‐25 25 <4.58 <11.9 <29.8 <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.27 <0.46 <0.05 <0.05 ‐‐ 1.06
B‐12‐32.5 32.5 <4.24 <11.0 <27.5 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.22
B‐12‐40 40 <4.06 <12.0 <30.1 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.24 <0.41 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 0.922
B‐13‐25 25 <3.81 <10.9 <27.3 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.23 <0.38 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 0.988
B‐13‐30 30 <4.02 <12.1 <30.3 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.24 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 0.916
B‐13‐40 40 <3.84 <12.0 <30.1 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.23 <0.38 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.90
B‐14‐35 35 <4.26 <11.0 <27.5 <0.02 <0.09 <0.09 <0.26 <0.43 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ ‐‐
B‐14‐40 40 <4.22 <11.4 <28.6 <0.02 <0.08 <0.08 <0.25 <0.42 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.93
B‐14‐45 45 <3.72 <11.6 <29.0 <0.01 <0.07 <0.07 <0.22 <0.37 <0.04 <0.04 ‐‐ 1.21
B15‐20 20 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B15‐25 25 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B15‐30 30 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B16‐30 30 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B16‐35 35 16 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.70 1.1 0.30 1.7 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B16‐40 40 5 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.17 0.23 0.06 0.37 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B17‐15 15 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B17‐20 20 930 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.4 2.5 3.1 17 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B17‐25 25 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B18‐20 20 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B18‐25 25 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B18‐30 30 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
SP01 SP‐20080826 08/26/08 ‐‐ <2 <50 <250 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B19‐23.5 23.5 <2 <11.0 <27.6 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B19‐28.5 28.5 120 <11.2 <28.0 <0.02 0.076 <0.28 1.2 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B20‐28.5 28.5 <2 19.8 <27.0 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B20‐33 33 <2 32.7 <26.5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B21‐10 10 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B21‐18 18 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.05 ‐‐
B21‐20 20 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B22‐10 10 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B22‐15 15 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B22‐20 20 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B22‐30 30 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B23‐10 10 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B23‐18 18 5.6 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.21 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B23‐26 26 5,000 ‐‐ ‐‐ <1 9.5 11 44 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B23‐35 35 3.1 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B24‐15 15 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B24‐17.5 17.5 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B25 B25‐18 06/10/13 18 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B26 B26‐35 06/10/13 35 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
30/100(7) 2,000 2,000 0.03 7 6 9 0.1 0.005 NE 5 250
B13/MW17
B14/MW18
09/27/06
B11/MW15
B12/MW16
B16/MW21
09/26/06
09/27/06
07/25/07
07/25/07
09/27/06
B15/MW22
07/26/07
B18/MW19
B17/MW20
07/26/07
B19/AS01 11/18/10
MTCA Method A Cleanup Level for Soil(6)
06/11/13B21
B20/AS02 11/18/10
B24 06/11/13
B22
B23
06/11/13
06/11/13
P:\0440 TOC Holdings Co\01‐399 Poulsbo\Technical\Tables\2013\SSI\01‐399_2013SSI_SD_DFCR.xlsx 2 of 3
Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
TOC Holdings Co. Facility 01‐399
19740 Viking Avenue Northwest
Poulsbo, Washington
Draft ‐ Issued for Client Review
GRPH(1) DRPH(2) ORPH(2) Benzene(3) Toluene(3) Ethylbenzene(3)Total
Xylenes(3) MTBE(4) EDB(4) EDC(4) Naphthalene(4)Total
Lead(5)
Analytical Results (mg/kg)Sample
Depth
(bgs)
Sample
Date
Sample
Identification
Sample
Location
B27‐28.5 28.5 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B27‐35 35 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B27‐40 40 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B28 B‐28‐27.5 06/12/13 27.5 2.6 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B30‐25 25 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B30‐27 27 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B30‐32 32 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B31‐20 20 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
B31‐22.5 22.5 <2 ‐‐ ‐‐ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
30/100(7) 2,000 2,000 0.03 7 6 9 0.1 0.005 NE 5 250
NOTES:
Red denotes concentration exceeds MTCA Method A cleanup level. ‐‐ = not analyzed or not measured
< = not detected at a concentration exceeding laboratory reporting limits
bgs = below ground surface
Samples analyzed after September 2006 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. of Seattle, Washington. DRPH = diesel‐range petroleum hydrocarbons(1)Anayzed by Method NWTPH‐Gx. EDB = ethylene dibromide (1,2‐dibromoethane)(2)Anayzed by Method NWTPH‐Dx. EDC = ethylene dichloride (1,2‐dichloroethane)(3)Anayzed by EPA Method 8021, 8012B, or 8260B. EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(4)Analyzed by EPA Method 8260 or 8260C. GRPH = gasoline‐range petroleum hydrocarbons (5)Analyzed by EPA Method 6020. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
MTBE = methyl tertiary‐butyl ether
MTCA = Washington State Model Toxics Control Act(7)30 mg/kg when benzene is present and 100 mg/kg when benzene is not present. NE = not established
Laboratory Notes: NWTPH = northwest total petroleum hydrocarbonEEstimated value. The reported value exceeds the calibration range of the analysis. ORPH = oil‐range petroleum hydrocarbonsxThe pattern of peaks present is not indicative of diesel. The result is due to overlap from the gasoline range. UST = underground storage tank
B30
06/10/13
06/10/13
(6)MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels, Table 740‐1 of Section 900 of Chapter 173‐340 of the
Washington Administrative Code, revised November 2007.
Samples analyzed in November 2005 through September 2006 by TestAmerica Laboratories,
Inc. (formerly North Creek Analytical) of Bothell, Washington.
B27
MTCA Method A Cleanup Level for Soil(6)
B31 11/18/13
P:\0440 TOC Holdings Co\01‐399 Poulsbo\Technical\Tables\2013\SSI\01‐399_2013SSI_SD_DFCR.xlsx 3 of 3
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
APPENDIX A
BORING LOGS
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
1 of 2
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
0
5
10
15
--
--
Poulsbo, Washington
21
6/11/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/11/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue
B21
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
21.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM
SM
0.0
0.0
13
10
10
10
11
12
75
80Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND with graveland finer sand, brown-gray, no hydrocarbonodor (20-70-10).
Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND withgravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).
Asphalt.
B21-05
B21-10
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
2 of 2
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
15
20
25
30
--
--
Poulsbo, Washington
21
6/11/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/11/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue
B21
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
21.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM
SM
SM-ML
ML
32.5
13.9
4.6
50/6
50/6
50/6
300
200
200
Boring terminated at 21.5 feet below groundsurface and backfilled with bentonite.
Moist, water on sample, fine sandy SILT, brown-gray, faint hydrocarbon odor (65-35-0).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND to sandy SILT,hydrocarbon odor (40-60-0).
Moist, very dense, silty fine to medium SAND,brown-gray, hydrocarbon odor (20-80-0).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, gray-brown, hydrocarbon odor present(15-80-5).
B21-18
B21-20
B21-21
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
1 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
0
5
10
15
--
--
Poulsbo, Washington
30
6/11/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/11/2013
CMP/EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B22
18.5 feet south of SW building corner
66 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
38
300
D+M
HSA
--
Asphalt
SM
SM
0.0
0.0
12
15
20
14
18
19
75
100Moist, dense, silty fine SAND with trace gravel,brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).
Moist, dense, silty fine SAND with trace gravel,brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (15-80-5).
Asphalt.
B22-05
B22-10
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
2 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
15
20
25
30
--
--
Poulsbo, Washington
30
6/11/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/11/2013
CMP/EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B22
18.5 feet south of SW building corner
66 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
38
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM
SM
SM-SP
0.0
0.0
0.0
50/6
50/6
50/6
150
125
150Moist, very dense, fine to coarse SAND, brown,no hydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND, gray-brown,no hydrocarbon odor (35-65-0).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND wtih tracegravel, brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).
B22-15
B22-20
--
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
3 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
30
35
40
45
--
--
Poulsbo, Washington
30
6/11/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/11/2013
CMP/EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B22
18.5 feet south of SW building corner
66 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
38
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM
SM-ML
0.0
0.0
50/6
50/6
150
125
Boring terminated at 38 feet below groundsurface and backfilled with bentonite.
Wet, very dense, well consolidated, silty fineSAND to sandy SILT with gravel, gray, fainthydrocarbon odor (40-50-10). Sand-rich lenspresent.
Strong hydrocarbon odor in cuttings. PID: 83ppm.
Wet, very dense, silty fine SAND, brown, nohydrocarbon odor (25-75-0).
B22-30
B22-37.5
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
1 of 4
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
0
5
10
15
--
--
Poulsbo, Washington
26
6/11/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/11/13
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B23
10 feet south of SW building corner
52 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
45.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
Asphalt
SM
SM
0.0
0.0
8
10
12
10
10
9
50
90Moist, medium dense, silty fine to medium SANDwith gravel, brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor(25-60-15).
Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND withgravel, brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-65-15).
Asphalt.
B23-05
B23-10
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
2 of 4
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
15
20
25
30
--
--
Poulsbo, Washington
26
6/11/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/11/13
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B23
10 feet south of SW building corner
52 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
45.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM
SM
SM-SP
32
945
58.1
50/5
50/6
50/6
32
200
200Moist to wet, very dense, fine SAND with somesilt, moderate hydrocarbon odor (10-90-0).
Moist to wet, very dense, silty fine SAND tosandy SILT, gray, strong hydrocarbon odor (40-60-0).
Moist, very dense, silty SAND with some gravel,brown, faint hydrocarbon odor. Large gravelstuck at bottom of sample.
B23-18
B23-25
B23-26
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
3 of 4
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
30
35
40
45
--
--
Poulsbo, Washington
26
6/11/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/11/13
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B23
10 feet south of SW building corner
52 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
45.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM-SP
SM-SP
69.7
9.3
50/6
50/6
300
300Wet, very dense, fine to medium SAND with silt,gray, faint hydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).
Wet, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with somesilt, brown-gray, possible faint hydrocarbon odor(10-90-0). Small lenses of silty sand present.
B23-35
B23-40
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
4 of 4
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
45
50
55
60
--
--
Poulsbo, Washington
26
6/11/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/11/13
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B23
10 feet south of SW building corner
52 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
45.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM-SP6.9 (slough)50/6 85
Boring terminated at 45.5 feet below groundsurface and backfilled with bentonite.
Wet, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with somesilt, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (10-90-0).
B23-45
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
1 of 2
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
0
5
10
15
--
--
Poulsbo, Washington
--
6/11/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/11/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B24
25.5 feet south of SW building corner
50.25 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
28.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
Asphalt
SM
SM
0.0
0.0
7
10
14
50/6
75
50
Asphalt.
Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-75-5).
B24-05
--
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
2 of 2
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
15
20
25
30
--
--
Poulsbo, Washington
--
6/11/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/11/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B24
25.5 feet south of SW building corner
50.25 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
28.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM
SM
SM
SM-ML
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.6
50/6
50/6
50/6
50/6
100
125
150
200
Moist, very dense, silty fine to coarse SAND withgravel, several large gravels present, brown, nohydrocarbon odor (20-65-15).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with gravel,brown-gray, some orange discoloration, nohydrocarbon odor (25-60-15).
Moist, very dense, well consolidated, silty fineSAND with some gravel, brown-gray, nohydrocarbon odor (35-55-10).
Moist, very dense, well consolidated, silty fineSAND to sandy SILT, gray, faint hydrocarbonodor (45-55-0).
Boring terminated at 28.5 feet below groundsurface and back filled with bentonite.
B24-15
B24-17.5
--
B24-28
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
1 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
0
5
10
15
--
Poulsbo, Washington
27.5
6/10/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/10/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B25
39.5 feet south of SW building corner
51.5 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
35.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
Asphalt
SM
SM
0.0
0.0
8
8
8
50/6
65
125
Asphalt.
Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-75-5).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).
B25-10
--
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
2 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
15
20
25
30
--
Poulsbo, Washington
27.5
6/10/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/10/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B25
39.5 feet south of SW building corner
51.5 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
35.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM
SM
SM
SM
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.3
32.0 (slough)
50/6
50/6
50/6
50/6
200
150
125
200
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with gravel,brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-65-15). Sandbecomes more coarse with depth.
Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with siltand gravel, brown, faint hydrocarbon odor (15-70-15).
Slough is gray, silty SAND, strong hydrocarbonodor.Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with siltand gravel, brown, faint hydrocarbon odor (15-70-15).
Wet, very dense, fine SAND with silt, gray,moderate hydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).
B25-18
B25-20
B25-25
B25-27.5
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
3 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
30
35
40
45
--
Poulsbo, Washington
27.5
6/10/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/10/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B25
39.5 feet south of SW building corner
51.5 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
35.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM
SM-ML
32.5
0.0
50/6
50/6
150
300
Wet, very dense, fine SAND with silt, gray, fainthydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).
Moist, very dense, very well consolidated, siltyfine SAND to sandy SILT with trace gravel, gray,no hydrocarbon odor (45-50-5).
Boring terminated at 35.5 feet below groundsurface and backfilled with bentonite.
B25-30
B25-35
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
1 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
0
5
10
15
--
Poulsbo, Washington
30
6/10/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/10/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B26
9 feet south of SW building corner
28.5 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
40.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
Asphalt
SM
SM
2.0
2.0
14
22
30
14
17
18
100
100
Asphalt.
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (30-60-10).
Moist, dense, silty fine SAND with some gravel,gray, no hydrocarbon odor (30-60-10).
--
--
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
2 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
15
20
25
30
--
Poulsbo, Washington
30
6/10/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/10/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B26
9 feet south of SW building corner
28.5 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
40.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM
SM-SP
SM
SP
2.0
0.0
0.0
15
50/6
50/6
17
17
20
150
100
100
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (30-60-10).Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, gray-brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, gray-brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).
Moist, dense, fine to medium SAND with trace siltand gravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (5-90-5).
--
B26-19
--
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
3 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
30
35
40
45
--
Poulsbo, Washington
30
6/10/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/10/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B26
9 feet south of SW building corner
28.5 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
40.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM
SP
SPSM-SP
0.0
0.0
0.0
50/6
21
50/6
50/6
125
150
--
Wet, very dense, silty fine SAND, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (20-80-0).
Moist to wet, very dense, fine to medium SANDwith trace silt, trace gravel, and some coarsesand, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (5-90-5).
Wet, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with tracesilt and gravel, no hydrocarbon odor (5-90-5).Increasing silt towards bottom of sample (15-85-0).
Boring terminated at 40.5 feet below groundsurface and backfilled with bentonite.
--
B26-35
B26-40
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
1 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
0
5
10
15
--
Poulsbo, Washington
33
6/10/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/10/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B27
30 feet south of SW building corner
2.25 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
43.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
Asphalt
SM
SM
1.0
1.0
14
27
28
50/6
100
90
Asphalt.
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).Transition to coarser sand at 5.5 feet bgs.
Moist, very dense, silty, gravelly fine SAND, gray,no hydrocarbon odor (30-50-20).
--
--
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
2 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
15
20
25
30
--
Poulsbo, Washington
33
6/10/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/10/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B27
30 feet south of SW building corner
2.25 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
43.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM
SP
SP-SM
MLSM
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50/6
50/6
50/6
50/6
125
100
200
200
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with gravel,gray, no hydrocarbon odor (35-50-15).
Moist, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with tracesilt and gravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (5-90-5).
Moist, very dense, fine SAND with some silt, grayno hydrocarbon odor (10-90-0).
Moist to wet, very dense, stiff, sandy SILT, gray,no hydrocarbon odor (75-25-0).Moist to wet, silty fine to coarse SAND, nohydrocarbon odor (35-65-0).
--
--
B27-23.5
B27-28.5
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
3 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
30
35
40
45
--
Poulsbo, Washington
33
6/10/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/10/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B27
30 feet south of SW building corner
2.25 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
43.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
ML
SP
SP
SP
0.0
48.3
7.8
0.0
50/6
50/6
50/6
17
50/6
175
300
200
150
Moist, very hard, fine sandy SILT, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (80-20-0).
Wet, very dense, medium to coarse SAND withtrace silt, gray, moderate hydrocarbon odor (5-95-0).
Wet, very dense, medium to coarse SAND withtrace silt, gray, faint hydrocarbon odor (5-95-0).
Wet, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with tracegravel and silt, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (5-90-5).
Boring terminated at 43.5 feet below groundsurface and backfilled with bentonite.
B27-30
B27-35
B27-40
B27-42.5
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
1 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
0
5
10
15
--
Poulsbo, Washington
33
6/12/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/12/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B28
34 feet south of SW building corner
34.5 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
23
300
D+M
HSA
--
Asphalt
SM
SM
0.0
0.0
3
3
5
8
9
13
75
90
Asphalt.
Moist, loose, silty fine SAND with trace gravel,brown, no hydrocarbon odor (25-70-5).
Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (25-70-5).
--
--
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
2 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
15
20
25
30
--
Poulsbo, Washington
33
6/12/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/12/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B28
34 feet south of SW building corner
34.5 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
23
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM
SP-SM
SP
SM-ML
0.0
0.0
17.4
23
50/6
50/6
17
50/6
50/6
200
200
150
200
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (30-60-10).
Moist, very dense, silty, fine to medium SANDwith trace gravel, brown-gray, no hydrocarbonodor (15-80-5).
Moist, very dense, fine to coarse SAND withsome silt, brown-gray, possible fainthydrocarbon odor (10-90-0).
Moist to wet, very dense, silty fine SAND tosandy SILT, gray, moderate hydrocarbon odor(45-55-0).
--
B28-20
--
B28-27.5
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
3 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
30
35
40
45
--
Poulsbo, Washington
33
6/12/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/12/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B28
34 feet south of SW building corner
34.5 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
23
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM-ML
SP-SM
SM
SM-ML
16.6
37.4
6.2
0.0
50/6
50/6
50/6
50/6
200
200
300
--
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND to sandy SILTwith trace gravel, gray, strong hydrocarbon odor(45-50-5).
Driller reports water between 30 and 35 feet bgs.
Wet, very dense, fine to medium SAND with somesilt, gray, moderate hydrocarbon odor (10-90-0).
Wet, very dense, fine to medium SAND with silt,brown-gray, faint hydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).
Moist, very dense, well consolidated, silty fineSAND to sandy SILT with some gravel, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (40-50-10).
Boring terminated at 43 feet below groundsurface and backfilled with bentonite.
--
--
B28-40
B28-42.5
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
1 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
0
5
10
15
--
Poulsbo, Washington
32
6/10/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/10/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B30
16.25 feet south of SW building corner
16.25 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
40.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
Asphalt
SM
SM
0.0
1.0
17
27
21
50/6
100
25
Asphalt.
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-75-5).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with somegravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (20-70-10).
--
--
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
2 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
15
20
25
30
--
Poulsbo, Washington
32
6/10/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/10/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B30
16.25 feet south of SW building corner
16.25 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
40.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SM-SP
SM-ML
SM
SP
SMML
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50/6
50/6
50/6
50/6
50/6
100
120
175
200
175
Moist, very dense, fine to medium SANDcoarsening with depth with some silt and gravel,gray, no hydrocarbon odor (10-80-10).
Moist, very dense to very hard, silty fine SAND tosandy SILT with trace gravel, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (45-50-5).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).
Moist, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with tracesilt, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (5-95-0).
Moist, very dense, fine SAND with silt, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (15-85-0).In shoe: moist, very hard, sandy SILT, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (55-45-0).
--
--
B30-22.5
B30-25
B20-27
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
3 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
30
35
40
45
--
Poulsbo, Washington
32
6/10/2013
RKB
Asphalt
6/10/2013
EBF
TOC Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
B30
16.25 feet south of SW building corner
16.25 feet west of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Cascade / Dave
40.5
300
D+M
HSA
--
SP
SP
SP
14.6
3.3
0.0
50/6
50/6
50/6
300
300
300
Wet, very dense, medium to coarse SAND withtrace silt, gray, moderate hydrocarbon odor (5-95-0).
Wet, very dense, medium to coarse SAND withtrace silt, gray, faint hydrocarbon odor (5-95-0).
Wet, very dense, medium to coarse SAND withtrace silt and trace gravel, gray, no hydrocarbonodor (5-90-5).
Boring terminated at 40.5 feet below groundsurface and backfilled with bentonite.
B30-32
B30-36
B30-40
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
Site Address:
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water DepthAfter Completion
Time of DrillingWater Depth At
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
1 of 2Page:
0
5
10
15
--
B31
Poulsbo, Washington
19740 Viking AVenue NW
11/18/13
RKB
Asphalt
11/18/13
EBF
TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
2016 feet west of SW building corner
71.5 feet south of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
----
Cascade/Curtis
25.5
140
Split-spoon
Limited-access HSA
--
--
--
Asphalt at surface
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, brown, faint hydrocarbon odor (15, 80, 5).
Moist, very dense, silty fine to medium SANDwith trace fine gravel, brown, no hydrocarbonodor (15, 80, 5).
4.5
1.7
100
125
2450/6
4150/6
SM
SM
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
Site Address:
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water DepthAfter Completion
Time of DrillingWater Depth At
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
2 of 2Page:
15
20
25
30
--
B31
Poulsbo, Washington
19740 Viking AVenue NW
11/18/13
RKB
Asphalt
11/18/13
EBF
TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
2016 feet west of SW building corner
71.5 feet south of SW building corner
--
--
--
--
----
Cascade/Curtis
25.5
140
Split-spoon
Limited-access HSA
--
--
--
Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with siltand trace gravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor(10, 85, 5).
Wet, very dense, silty fine SAND to sandy SILT,gray, hydrocarbon odor (45, 55, 0).
Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with siltand trace gravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor(10, 85, 5).
Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with silt,brown, no hydrocarbon odor (10, 90, 0).
End of boring at 25.5 feet bgs. Backfill withbentonite.
B31-15
B31-20
B31-22.5
B31-25
0.5
10.9
1.1
0.0
125
100
125
100
50/6
50/6
50/6
50/6
SP
SM-ML
SP
SP
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
1 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
0
5
10
15
--
Poulsbo, Washington
35
11/19/13
RKB
Asphalt
11/19/13
EBF
TOC 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
AS03
8.5 feet south of SW building corner
33.5 feet west of SW building corner
37
36 to 37
0.010
2/12 Sand
Concrete
Buried
Bentonite and Grout
BIC 957
Cascade/Curtis
38.5
300
Split-spoon
HSA
2"/8.25
SM
SM
0.0
0.0
50/6
122024
200
75
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (15, 80, 5).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND with gravel,brown, no hydrocarbon odor (15, 75, 10).
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
2 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
15
20
25
30
--
Poulsbo, Washington
35
11/19/13
RKB
Asphalt
11/19/13
EBF
TOC 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
AS03
8.5 feet south of SW building corner
33.5 feet west of SW building corner
37
36 to 37
0.010
2/12 Sand
Concrete
Buried
Bentonite and Grout
BIC 957
Cascade/Curtis
38.5
300
Split-spoon
HSA
2"/8.25
SM
SP
SM-ML
SP
SP
0.0
0.0
0.0
2850/6
2750/6
3250/6
110
100
125
As previous
Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND withgravel and silt, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (5,85, 10).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND to sandy SILT,brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (50, 50, 0).
Moist, fine SAND with silt and trace gravel,brown-gray, no hydrocarbon odor (10, 85, 5).
Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with silt,brown, no hydrocarbon odor (5, 95, 0).
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water Depth After Completion:
Water Depth At Time of Drilling:
Site Address:
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Page:
3 of 3
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
30
35
40
45
--
Poulsbo, Washington
35
11/19/13
RKB
Asphalt
11/19/13
EBF
TOC 01-399
0440-038
19740 Viking Avenue NW
AS03
8.5 feet south of SW building corner
33.5 feet west of SW building corner
37
36 to 37
0.010
2/12 Sand
Concrete
Buried
Bentonite and Grout
BIC 957
Cascade/Curtis
38.5
300
Split-spoon
HSA
2"/8.25
SM
SP
SP
ML
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50/6
1950/6
50/6
50/6
125
130
200
125
Moist, very dense, sandy SILT to silty SAND,gray, no hydrocarbon odor (45, 55, 0).
Wet, very dense, fine to medium SAND with silt,gray, no hydrocarbon odor (5, 95, 0).
Wet, as previous, increasing silt in shoe ofsampler (10, 90, 0).
Driller reports hard drilling at 37 feet bgs.
Moist, hard, consolidated, sandy SILT, gray, nohydrocarbon odor (60, 40, 0).
End of boring at 38.5 feet bgs. Install air spargewell.
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
Site Address:
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water DepthAfter Completion
Time of DrillingWater Depth At
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
1 of 3Page:
0
5
10
15
--
AS04
Poulsbo, Washington
19740 Viking Avenue NW
11/19/13
RKB
Asphalt
11/19/13
EBF
TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
3052 feet west of SW building corner
12 feet south of SW building corner
39.5
38.5 to 39.5
0.010
2/12 Sand
BuriedBIC 958
Cascade/Curtis
40.5
300
Split-spoon
HSA
2/8.25"
Notes
Bentonite/Grout
Concrete
Moist, medium dense, silty gravelly fine SAND,brown, faint hydrocarbon odor (15, 75, 10).
Moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND with tracegravel, brown, no hydrocarbon odor (20, 75, 5).
14.7
0.0
100
100
9910
101412
SM
SM
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
Site Address:
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water DepthAfter Completion
Time of DrillingWater Depth At
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
2 of 3Page:
15
20
25
30
--
AS04
Poulsbo, Washington
19740 Viking Avenue NW
11/19/13
RKB
Asphalt
11/19/13
EBF
TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
3052 feet west of SW building corner
12 feet south of SW building corner
39.5
38.5 to 39.5
0.010
2/12 Sand
BuriedBIC 958
Cascade/Curtis
40.5
300
Split-spoon
HSA
2/8.25"
Notes
Bentonite/Grout
Concrete
Similar to previous, silty fine SAND with gravel,no hydrocarbon odor (20, 70, 10).
Moist, very dense, fine to coarse SAND with siltand trace gravel, brown faint hydrocarbon odor(10, 85, 5).
Moist, very dense, silty fine SAND to sandy SILT,blue gray, very strong hydrocarbon odor (45, 55,0).
Moist, fine to medium SAND with silt, brown,moderate hydrocarbon odor (10, 90, 0).
Moist to wet, silty fine SAND, blue gray, fainthydrocarbon odor (45, 55, 0).
Moist to wet, as previous, very stronghydrocarbon odor (45, 55, 0).
Moist to wet, silty fine SAND, blue-gray,hydrocarbon odor (35, 65, 0).
AS04-22.5
AS04-25.5
AS04-27.5
0.0
2.7
116
14.2
503
130
100
80
110
125
2450/6
50/6
2450/6
50/6
2250/6
SM
SW
SM-ML
SP
SM-ML
SM-ML
SM
Date Completed:
USCS
feet bgs%
Re
co
ve
ry
Blo
w C
ount
Project:
Project Number:
Logged by:
Date Started:
Surface Conditions:
Well Location N/S:
Well Location E/W:
Reviewed by:
Depth Well
DetailGra
phic
ClassSample
ID
Inte
rval
(fee
t bgs
)LOG
BORING
Site Address:
ConstructionLithologic DescriptionPID (ppmv)
feet bgs
Water DepthAfter Completion
Time of DrillingWater Depth At
lbs
feet bgs
feet bgs
inches
inches
feet bgsWell Screened Interval:
Screen Slot Size:
Filter Pack Used:
Surface Seal:
Annular Seal:
Monument Type:
Drilling Equipment:
Drilling Co./Driller:
Sampler Type:
Hammer Type/Weight:
Total Boring Depth:
Total Well Depth:
State Well ID No.:
Notes/Comments:Well/Auger Diameter:
3 of 3Page:
30
35
40
45
--
AS04
Poulsbo, Washington
19740 Viking Avenue NW
11/19/13
RKB
Asphalt
11/19/13
EBF
TOC Holdings Co. Facility No. 01-399
0440-038
3052 feet west of SW building corner
12 feet south of SW building corner
39.5
38.5 to 39.5
0.010
2/12 Sand
BuriedBIC 958
Cascade/Curtis
40.5
300
Split-spoon
HSA
2/8.25"
Notes
Bentonite/Grout
Concrete
Wet, very dense, silty fine SAND, gray,hydrocarbon odor (15, 85, 0).
Wet, medium dense, fine to medium SAND withsilt, gray, hydrocarbon odor (10, 90, 0).
Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND with siltand trace gravel, gray, faint hydrocarbon odor(10, 85, 5).
Moist, very dense, fine to medium SAND withgravel and silt, increasing gravel with depth,gray-brown, faint hydrocarbon odor (10, 80, 10).
Wet, very dense, fine to medium SAND with siltand gravel, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (15, 75,10).
Upper sample as previous. Bottom of samplevery dense, consolidated, sandy gravelly SILT tosilty SAND, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (40, 50,10).Moist, hard, fine sandy SILT with trace gravel,consolidated, gray, no hydrocarbon odor (60, 35,5).
End of boring at 40.5 feet bgs. Install air spargewell.
AS04-37
156
91.4
15.2
2.2
2.7
0.7
0.0
80
100
100
100
150
300
2050/6
121516
162324
153750/6
50/6
50/6
50/6
SM
SP
SP
SP
SP
SPSM-ML
ML
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
Friedman and Bruya, Inc. #306184
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
James E. Bruya, Ph.D. 3012 16th Avenue West Yelena Aravkina, M.S. Seattle, WA 98119-2029 Michael Erdahl, B.S. (206) 285-8282 Kurt Johnson, B.S. [email protected] Eric Young, B.S. www.friedmanandbruya.com
June 18, 2013 Ryan Bixby, Project Manager SoundEarth Strategies 2811 Fairview Ave. East, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98102 Dear Mr. Bixby: Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on June 12, 2013 from the TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306184 project. There are 4 pages included in this report. Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for disposal in 30 days. If you would like us to return your samples or arrange for long term storage at our offices, please contact us as soon as possible. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you should have any questions. Sincerely, FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
Michael Erdahl Project Manager Enclosures c: Audrey Hackett, Beau Johnson SOU0618R.DOC
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
1
CASE NARRATIVE This case narrative encompasses samples received on June 12, 2013 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the SoundEarth Strategies TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306184 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID’s listed below. Laboratory ID SoundEarth Strategies 306184-01 B28-20 306184-02 B28-27.5 306184-03 B28-40 306184-04 B28-42.5 All quality control requirements were acceptable.
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
2
Date of Report: 06/18/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306184 Date Extracted: 06/13/13 Date Analyzed: 06/13/13
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING METHODS 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Ethyl Total Gasoline Surrogate Sample ID Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Range (% Recovery) Laboratory ID (Limit 50-150) B28-27.5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 2.6 94 306184-02
Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 87 03-1097 MB
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
3
Date of Report: 06/18/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306184
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES, AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING EPA METHOD 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Laboratory Code: 306186-02 (Duplicate) Analyte
Reporting
Units
Sample Result
(Wet Wt)
Duplicate Result
(Wet Wt)
RPD
(Limit 20) Benzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Toluene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) <0.06 <0.06 nm Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) <2 <2 nm Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Analyte
Reporting
Units
Spike Level
Percent Recovery
LCS
Acceptance
Criteria Benzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 90 66-121 Toluene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 89 72-128 Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 91 69-132 Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) 1.5 93 69-131 Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) 20 95 61-153
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
4
Data Qualifiers & Definitions a - The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.
A1 – More than one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probability.
b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix spike recoveries may not be meaningful.
ca - The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an estimate.
c - The presence of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.
d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits may be raised due to dilution.
ds - The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may not be meaningful.
dv - Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised accordingly.
fb - Analyte present in the blank and the sample.
fc – The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant.
hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity.
ht - Analysis performed outside the method or client-specified holding time requirement.
ip - Recovery fell outside of normal control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the quantitation of the analyte.
j – The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate.
J - The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration is an estimate.
jl - The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
jr - The rpd result in laboratory control sample associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
js - The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
lc - The presence of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination.
L - The reported concentration was generated from a library search.
nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the RPD is not applicable.
pc – The sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should be considered an estimate.
pr – The sample was received with incorrect preservation. The value reported should be considered an estimate.
ve - Estimated concentration calculated for an analyte response above the valid instrument calibration range. A dilution is required to obtain an accurate quantification of the analyte.
vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte.
x - The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation.
u, o n o D --t
e *g
ao
Ed
ea
dl
f;
lu
lt
tr
ll
l-
la
lrn
l-
' 1
9to
to
t\
ts
F'
tdId
|e|q
l|
>l
fl
l<
lq
I ts
tdt
tE
tt
to
ft
l6
||
lt
tl
tt
l|
|l
tt
l
1l J l o IN lo t9 lq)
lo lo.
ll
l.O to lo I I I I I 'Tl o x +
a/, 3 '! F m o - z o 1t o G v, -l o 0 \ Dt
\ o.,
I
(t') ( G
v) )".
CO \ .\ t. 1
t-)
(p c
Y"
Y c{) : f, -lJ i1
6t 'iJ f,q'
\, ir"
v, o 3 p. o E
IIFi
I I
ftt i \'.,
ic0
Fg
Q5 fE
II{ \.'
\
r(.
"$ ra
, I
f.t a.
sgI
f r> Jr
t*l \a {
D F irnE
g
I Ir
i Ft'
i:\ iN i\
9o
lo rd o.
{ N I / I
A /.f,
o { ;)i urI
rl -9 N C)
a \\, $
el N
\t ,$ "l
v, 9r
It F6
o
/
r\A s r
= o x
Ilt
\t}
l ,(h
FI
NW
TP
H-D
x
z v, ltt v, v m o G m vl |lI I
\N
WT
PH
-Gx
\B
TE
X
by
80
21
B
VO
C's
by
82
60
SV
OC
's by
82
70
RC
RA
-8 Me
lqls
r-uE
Ts
I6
v,
I
tO
I
+'
n ol
\g
.) n
\"
-i\
zl'
rr
!v
t=
-Q
q
\6
UI = -(,
t- rn n (/,
(d'
o 0I \\r,
-\
m (/, z
=d
F8 9
E -
:o
O
){
Qo
3
=d
d*
I I
eo
7
X4
* s
gn S n
-J
cX
a(
,4
f r-
O
- *r
ol
o
cq
l d
2u
l F
>P
l = 6
+l
O
c
dl
*=
:,
1
o
\.,
Xl
-
=ii_
|u
l rn
<l "l
3
il i
tr e
#A t
H s g
5d
a
u B
t i
ri
g R
€ ic
R
5 S
G b
s!
N
€
5
$
x s
!''
=n o o o o o
n o c o x
n o f o J o o :
\[ \\l
N/
\ \ t\\ \
q o z c n m
Y \tr $ \
-11
n z I z rTl
3 s E o o o
Y K h t.r'$
o o = 'o z
o o F t\ \ \ w'
-n
\\
I
= rTl
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
Friedman and Bruya, Inc. #306185
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
James E. Bruya, Ph.D. 3012 16th Avenue West Yelena Aravkina, M.S. Seattle, WA 98119-2029 Michael Erdahl, B.S. (206) 285-8282 Kurt Johnson, B.S. [email protected] Eric Young, B.S. www.friedmanandbruya.com
June 21, 2013 Ryan Bixby, Project Manager SoundEarth Strategies 2811 Fairview Ave. East, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98102 Dear Mr. Bixby: Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on June 12, 2013 from the TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185 project. There are 9 pages included in this report. Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for disposal in 30 days. If you would like us to return your samples or arrange for long term storage at our offices, please contact us as soon as possible. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you should have any questions. Sincerely, FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
Michael Erdahl Project Manager Enclosures c: Audrey Hackett, Beau Johnson SOU0621R.DOC
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
1
CASE NARRATIVE This case narrative encompasses samples received on June 12, 2013 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the SoundEarth Strategies TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID’s listed below. Laboratory ID SoundEarth Strategies 306185-01 B21-05 306185-02 B21-10 306185-03 B21-18 306185-04 B21-20 306185-05 B21-21 306185-06 B23-05 306185-07 B23-10 306185-08 B23-18 306185-09 B23-25 306185-10 B23-26 306185-11 B23-35 306185-12 B23-40 306185-13 B23-45 306185-14 B22-05 306185-15 B22-10 306185-16 B22-15 306185-17 B22-20 306185-18 B22-30 306185-19 B22-37.5 306185-20 B24-05 306185-21 B24-15 306185-22 B24-17.5 306185-23 B24-28 All quality control requirements were acceptable.
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
2
Date of Report: 06/21/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185 Date Extracted: 06/13/13 and 06/18/13 Date Analyzed: 06/13/13 and 06/18/13
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING METHODS 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Ethyl Total Gasoline Surrogate Sample ID Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Range (% Recovery) Laboratory ID (Limit 50-132) B21-10 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 84 306185-02 B21-18 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 81 306185-03
B21-20 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 89 306185-04
B23-10 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 88 306185-07
B23-18 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.21 5.6 88 306185-08
B23-26 <1 9.5 11 44 5,000 108 306185-10 1/50
B23-35 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 3.1 88 306185-11
B22-10 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 79 306185-15
B22-15 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 88 306185-16
B22-20 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 88 306185-17
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
3
Date of Report: 06/21/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185 Date Extracted: 06/13/13 and 06/18/13 Date Analyzed: 06/13/13 and 06/18/13
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING METHODS 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Ethyl Total Gasoline Surrogate Sample ID Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Range (% Recovery) Laboratory ID (Limit 50-132) B22-30 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 91 306185-18
B24-15 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 85 306185-21
B24-17.5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 90 306185-22 Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 87 03-1097 MB
Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 82 03-1160 MB
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
4
Analysis For Volatile Compounds By EPA Method 8260C Client Sample ID: B21-18 Client: SoundEarth Strategies Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7 Date Extracted: 06/13/13 Lab ID: 306185-03 Date Analyzed: 06/13/13 Data File: 061334.D Matrix: Soil Instrument: GCMS4 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Operator: JS Lower Upper Surrogates: % Recovery: Limit: Limit: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 59 116 Toluene-d8 101 51 121 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99 32 146 Concentration Compounds: mg/kg (ppm) Naphthalene <0.05
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
5
Analysis For Volatile Compounds By EPA Method 8260C Client Sample ID: Method Blank Client: SoundEarth Strategies Date Received: NA Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7 Date Extracted: 06/13/13 Lab ID: 03-1108 mb Date Analyzed: 06/13/13 Data File: 061308.D Matrix: Soil Instrument: GCMS4 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Operator: JS Lower Upper Surrogates: % Recovery: Limit: Limit: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 105 59 116 Toluene-d8 101 51 121 4-Bromofluorobenzene 103 32 146 Concentration Compounds: mg/kg (ppm) Naphthalene <0.05
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
6
Date of Report: 06/21/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES, AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING METHOD 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Laboratory Code: 306186-02 (Duplicate) Analyte
Reporting
Units
Sample Result
(Wet Wt)
Duplicate Result
(Wet Wt)
RPD
(Limit 20) Benzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Toluene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) <0.06 <0.06 nm Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) <2 <2 nm Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Analyte
Reporting
Units
Spike Level
Percent Recovery
LCS
Acceptance
Criteria Benzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 90 66-121 Toluene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 89 72-128 Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 91 69-132 Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) 1.5 93 69-131 Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) 20 95 61-153
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
7
Date of Report: 06/21/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES, AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING EPA METHOD 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Laboratory Code: 306234-01 (Duplicate) Analyte
Reporting
Units
Sample Result
(Wet Wt)
Duplicate Result
(Wet Wt)
RPD
(Limit 20) Benzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Toluene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) <0.06 <0.06 nm Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) <2 <2 nm Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Analyte
Reporting
Units
Spike Level
Percent Recovery
LCS
Acceptance
Criteria Benzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 87 66-121 Toluene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 86 72-128 Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 89 69-132 Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) 1.5 90 69-131 Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) 20 90 61-153
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
8
Date of Report: 06/21/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR VOLATILES BY EPA METHOD 8260C
Laboratory Code: 306157-02 (Matrix Spike) Analyte
Reporting
Units
Spike Level
Sample Result
(Wet wt)
Percent Recovery
MS
Percent Recovery
MSD
Acceptance
Criteria
RPD
(Limit 20) Naphthalene mg/kg (ppm) 2.5 0.50 60 56 14-157 7 Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Analyte
Reporting
Units
Spike Level
Percent Recovery
LCS
Acceptance
Criteria Naphthalene mg/kg (ppm) 2.5 88 63-140
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
9
Data Qualifiers & Definitions a - The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.
A1 – More than one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probability.
b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix spike recoveries may not be meaningful.
ca - The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an estimate.
c - The presence of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.
d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits may be raised due to dilution.
ds - The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may not be meaningful.
dv - Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised accordingly.
fb - Analyte present in the blank and the sample.
fc – The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant.
hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity.
ht - Analysis performed outside the method or client-specified holding time requirement.
ip - Recovery fell outside of normal control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the quantitation of the analyte.
j – The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate.
J - The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration is an estimate.
jl - The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
jr - The rpd result in laboratory control sample associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
js - The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
lc - The presence of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination.
L - The reported concentration was generated from a library search.
nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the RPD is not applicable.
pc – The sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should be considered an estimate.
pr – The sample was received with incorrect preservation. The value reported should be considered an estimate.
ve - Estimated concentration calculated for an analyte response above the valid instrument calibration range. A dilution is required to obtain an accurate quantification of the analyte.
vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte.
x - The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation.
ll
U' o a n o E -{ o
.?
4q
qo
od
',
aq
.d
li
; l
ul
I l-
Lt1
la
l-
19
lo
lo
I\
g
l='
ldl
dl
gH
ll
>l
fl
t<
ta
tt
ot
+I
l
-g
tt
to
ll
lo
ll
ls
tt
lt
tl
||
lt
tl
tr
l
J o + L lo l+ lG)
to lo.
ll t\o
to I I I I I 'Tl x
v, = .u F m o - z o -l o G v, -| o (' \ \]h iq,
Sr ! t\ I
\,\)
5r \J IrI) _r {
il) U uJ I NJ
- s
il) i9 luJ
il
ii,i'
iJl
it
"l.l
)./
J) ! U i
$) iU iuJ
i iI iU i(^il, U Lt
J! N
rx)
IP rlJ .I o
F iu iw it io ittti-,
.11
lN I il itr -
it-.i
iN i il
I lp ic
id iN it m
,I I i
il LJ a a
lUt)
iN li
iq ivi
i i
alr o 3 p. o c,
II
I6l Ut-
! 1 -1 ic-t
J
IFJ
FI
OJ fx
J' .J]
f.IJ Y
ii [i
)t
^l(
.fir
/ |
-
ti
.!$
iC
Lli
;i
ll
ii
i
UU n
si
l
l'\
v!
gH\)
sF
\s
\ T
:I
$fe i
vJ s\
ra 71
) tr3
',.)
tl.> $o i.l
D h t.
ifn
E5
Is s
vl .E
'P
O
do
o,
; p Ji
= I) o
G "l
li
r'!c
-ic
it>
i./
iOiu
l ic',J
I
Ul
-c J,i c
o -Ct
0
o J c\
O rO vl I
vl
o o{\ vrl o
6-
;3
Fo
o
I t-l--
+
lr
3 o x
Fn
Fi
NW
TP
H-D
x
z v, ln a^ - m o c m vr tl| I
Xx
XY
xX
tN
WT
PH
-Gx
xx\
xx
xrt
BT
EX
b
y 8
02
1B
VO
C's
by
82
60
SV
OC
's by
82
70
RC
RA
-E Me
lols
\Y
atH
L['.
t5 iuo
\t s
t r,il
n--
l o
,L
f-'
m\,
' o z m
Y, '
9W J
o = t- rn a a/r
(o f, d
FP
q
5H
--
O!
Qo
3J
=T
P-E
f,I
qo
;g €9
? = O-
+o
cx
nv
zF
>s
Ad-
' EY
Z-
GO
-= m
n C f o J (o o o c = N o o
I s
3 tr
e#
A-
2 H
E g
$i
n
N N
S i
"i
g $
€ g
€I
N s
F
S.d
o
rb
S
=?
S
e
-dt.
€
q
'
:n o o o o x
n o ='
c f o ct x
lo o a.
o a1 :
g l s f o o(t 6 z c n m
) \ Srr\ l.! c -{ I A -r
Jo a { ( I
n z z = m
U)
te ic o b o .) (D o o
\ f N p
d C '_t. Ir l { s- )
o o -o z
1",\ \
o m
(?
\-t N
)!1
rn
(^) o O)
oO q
i8
OU
l-i
tN
ll
@l
t-
ll-
la
lo'
lgE
' ld
ts tH
l>
lrI<
tv
,to
ta
lrn
g
Il
ot
to
ll
sl
tt
lt
tt
lt
l
+ ; + ID IJ T I lu1 lo t+ t6-
T J f o :t I IN lo t? t(,
IO\
l'.
l.O to lo I I I I I 'Tl x
u, 3 ! F ltt o - z o at o c v, { o I .t frr
q o\ I fv I \^s {s { ,T
6) IN iC
j il iU ia
'oi\
/ \
FJ
N f : it
i- i--ts
Ji4
iil lf
!
i\J
ir
i jl
!- iJi[) iU if
,
il io iul
:
!-t iw !
n
I
i{J iir iw i}l "l
i6)
ip iu il il.il
CI
bJ IA
I
i\./ !U ir iiJ io
I h:r
llJ it-r
ir t- [rrI iF iu $.
Ji
r'|- io i i
p t9.)
i\.)
it
;vl
vr o 3 ! o €
I rif
i)i*
;ti
i i'
-!.
itJ iV iUF
fO
J ilxN ca
a.l J
)i iw I
liH i
t ilt
I
Jv |\N C
i t* YJ
I I
CI
tr
vr
I Isf
lt Jo
lt top
\5 bs
P+
I>;1 {
r P rn6
g
Ii ic
,\ i- l: S w
9o
eo Fr
o
i.l
iJ'j
UJ
ir
'
il
i I
N t".
l
UJ
9,
1t
v tA, t
t UJ c
).,)
}J vi
!J U C,
Y J, I
! c9
-t
tt
oo
('
3 o x
Ul-
\^F
TN
WT
PH
-Dx
z vr m
'(:<
\x
x*
NW
TP
H-G
x
xx
xx,
tB
TE
X
by
80
21
8
VO
C's
by
82
60
SV
OC
's by
82
7O
RC
RA
-g Me
tols
vr v m o G |lt v, fn I
(
= 6z o o 0
n rn n 7 U1
ln
at
or
t
Lv
rn
nO
td z
o r)
(/J
9J -0
(
(./,
T rn n a./,
(o c o=
\
I I
m 3 (/',
z
T o
F:
*g
:r
{
6
g5
H-
:o
0
)
l3 s
=i.
p.
q f
,J
I s
roa
;<
'a
sgd
n-
JC
Ro
43
-_
+
n
Ol
o c
ql
d2
ul
ii
>
ql F
pq
l x 3
Xl
-
+ii
lq
l rn
<l
"l
NI
o
A 3
$ i
tr g
tA
E
E *
:$
2
5 5
:
$g
f;
N N
I
is"
a
H S
I6
sg
F
N ;
H8
o
fu s
=g
I
Dd
:n o o o r
n g f o 6'
J o o o xI I I I
d o g o o :s
\ )
tn
lo
lo
lc
iq
IJ
to
io
to
!.
<
N.-
S | \.. IA iv t\
il
ii
I i I
v, o z n m
v \ \'
IJ
) 'r ( C 1J n. .\ -r n )
T n z I z rn
a Se
EI
nt I o t) (E
F N ll
vt
a c ) i_ flr \ t
3 -It z
g D l" tl
\\ N \
fTl
I t)\
\ N \n= 3 m
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
James E. Bruya, Ph.D. 3012 16th Avenue West Yelena Aravkina, M.S. Seattle, WA 98119-2029 Michael Erdahl, B.S. (206) 285-8282 Kurt Johnson, B.S. [email protected] Eric Young, B.S. www.friedmanandbruya.com
August 1, 2013 Ryan Bixby, Project Manager SoundEarth Strategies 2811 Fairview Ave. East, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98102 Dear Mr. Bixby: Included are the additional results from the testing of material submitted on June 12, 2013 from the TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185 project. There is 1 page included in this report. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you should have any questions. Sincerely, FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
Michael Erdahl Project Manager Enclosures c: Audrey Hackett, Beau Johnson SOU0801R.DOC
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
1
CASE NARRATIVE This case narrative encompasses samples received on June 12, 2013 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the SoundEarth Strategies TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306185 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID’s listed below. Laboratory ID SoundEarth Strategies 306185-01 B21-05 306185-02 B21-10 306185-03 B21-18 306185-04 B21-20 306185-05 B21-21 306185-06 B23-05 306185-07 B23-10 306185-08 B23-18 306185-09 B23-25 306185-10 B23-26 306185-11 B23-35 306185-12 B23-40 306185-13 B23-45 306185-14 B22-05 306185-15 B22-10 306185-16 B22-15 306185-17 B22-20 306185-18 B22-30 306185-19 B22-37.5 306185-20 B24-05 306185-21 B24-15 306185-22 B24-17.5 306185-23 B24-28 Sample B23-26 was sent to Fremont for EPH and VPH analyses. Review of the enclosed report indicates that all quality assurance were acceptable.
July 29, 2013
Friedman & BruyaMichael Erdahl
Attention Michael Erdahl:
RE: 306185Lab ID: 1307084
3012 16th Ave. W.Seattle, WA 98119
3600 Fremont Ave. N.Seattle, WA 98103
T: (206) 352-3790F: (206) 352-7178
Fremont Analytical, Inc. received 1 sample(s) on 7/16/2013 for the analyses presented in the following report.
Michael Dee
This report consists of the following:
- Case Narrative - Analytical Results - Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports - Chain of Custody
All analyses were performed consistent with the Quality Assurance program of Fremont Analytical, Inc. Please contact the laboratory if you should have any questions about the results.
Thank you for using Fremont Analytical.
Sincerely,
Sr. Chemist / Principal
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWEPHSample Moisture (Percent Moisture)Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWVPH
www.fremontanalytical.com
Page 1 of 13
07/29/2013Date:
Project: 306185CLIENT: Friedman & Bruya
Lab Order: 1307084
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date/Time ReceivedDate/Time Collected
1307084-001 B23-26 06/11/2013 10:10 AM 07/16/2013 2:00 PM
Note: If no "Time Collected" is supplied, a default of 12:00AM is assigned
Page 2 of 13
Project: 306185CLIENT: Friedman & Bruya
7/29/2013
Case Narrative1307084
Date:WO#:
I. SAMPLE RECEIPT:Samples receipt information is recorded on the attached Sample Receipt Checklist.
II. GENERAL REPORTING COMMENTS:Results are reported on a wet weight basis unless dry-weight correction is denoted in the units field on the analytical report ("mg/kg-dry" or "ug/kg-dry").
Matrix Spike (MS) and MS Duplicate (MSD) samples are tested from an analytical batch of "like" matrix to check for possible matrix effect. The MS and MSD will provide site specific matrix data only for those samples which are spiked by the laboratory. The sample chosen for spike purposes may or may not have been a sample submitted in this sample delivery group. The validity of the analytical procedures for which data is reported in this analytical report is determined by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB). The LCS and the MB are processed with the samples and the MS/MSD to ensure method criteria are achieved throughout the entire analytical process.
III. ANALYSES AND EXCEPTIONS:Exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the analytical results page(s) or the quality control summary page(s) and/or noted below.
Page 3 of 13
Project: 306185
Client Sample ID: B23-26
Collection Date: 6/11/2013 10:10:00 AM
Matrix: Soil
Client: Friedman & Bruya
Lab ID: 1307084-001
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFRL
Analytical Report
7/29/20131307084
Date Reported:WO#:
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWEPH Analyst: BRBatch ID: 5005
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) DH 7/22/2013 11:09:00 AM56.0 mg/Kg-dry 10101Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) H 7/20/2013 7:05:00 AM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 176.8Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) H 7/20/2013 7:05:00 AM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 118.7Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) H 7/20/2013 7:05:00 AM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 1NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) H 7/20/2013 7:05:00 AM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 1NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) H 7/20/2013 12:56:00 PM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 140.2Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) DH 7/22/2013 1:20:00 PM56.0 mg/Kg-dry 10145Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) H 7/20/2013 12:56:00 PM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 159.7Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) H 7/20/2013 12:56:00 PM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 116.8Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) H 7/20/2013 12:56:00 PM5.60 mg/Kg-dry 1ND Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane H 7/20/2013 7:05:00 AM65-140 %REC 178.6 Surr: o-Terphenyl H 7/20/2013 12:56:00 PM65-140 %REC 184.1
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWVPH Analyst: EMBatch ID: 5019
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C5-C6) H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 10.974Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C6-C8) H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 112.3Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) DH 7/23/2013 1:34:00 AM4.89 mg/Kg-dry 2020.2Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) DH 7/23/2013 1:34:00 AM4.89 mg/Kg-dry 2053.9Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 152.4Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) DH 7/23/2013 1:34:00 AM4.89 mg/Kg-dry 20134Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C13) DH 7/23/2013 1:34:00 AM4.89 mg/Kg-dry 2051.6Benzene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 1NDToluene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 10.613Ethylbenzene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 1NDm,p-Xylene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 10.342o-Xylene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 1NDNaphthalene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 1NDMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM0.245 mg/Kg-dry 1ND Surr: Bromofluorobenzene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM65-140 %REC 199.8 Surr: Trifluorotoluene H 7/23/2013 3:47:00 AM65-140 %REC 169.2
Sample Moisture (Percent Moisture) Analyst: KASBatch ID: R9226
Percent Moisture 7/16/2013 4:11:18 PMwt% 114.0
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was requiredE Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceededJ Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
Page 4 of 13
Project: 306185CLIENT: Friedman & BruyaWork Order: 1307084 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWEPH
7/29/2013Date:
Sample ID: 1307113-001BDUP
Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/20/2013
Prep Date: 7/18/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg-dry
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 9376
SeqNo: 188440
DUPSampType:
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 30 H7.31 104.6 25.181.3Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 30 EH7.31 645.3 23.4510Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 30 EH7.31 1,671 21.81,340Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 30 EH7.31 358.3 21.1290Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 30 H7.31 16.25 6.8415.2 Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 5.847 79.9 65 140 H04.67
Sample ID: 1307113-001BDUP
Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/20/2013
Prep Date: 7/18/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg-dry
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 9376
SeqNo: 188441
DUPSampType:
Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 30 RH7.31 0 0NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 30 RH7.31 46.95 43.430.2Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 30 REH7.31 326.1 36.2226Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 30 EH7.31 277.4 28.1209Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 30 H7.31 11.03 25.08.58 Surr: o-Terphenyl 5.847 78.1 65 140 H04.56
NOTES:R - High RPD indicates a possible matrix interference . The method is in control as indicated by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS and LCSD).
Sample ID: CCV-5005B
Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/22/2013
Prep Date: 7/18/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: CCV
RunNo: 9376
SeqNo: 188453
CCVSampType:
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 100.0 87.4 80 1205.00 087.4Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 50.00 86.0 80 1205.00 043.0Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 50.00 85.4 80 1205.00 042.7Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 50.00 80.5 80 1205.00 040.3
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
Page 5 of 13
Project: 306185CLIENT: Friedman & BruyaWork Order: 1307084 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWEPH
7/29/2013Date:
Sample ID: CCV-5005B
Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/22/2013
Prep Date: 7/18/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: CCV
RunNo: 9376
SeqNo: 188453
CCVSampType:
Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 40.00 93.7 80 12037.5
Sample ID: CCV-5005B
Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/22/2013
Prep Date: 7/18/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: CCV
RunNo: 9376
SeqNo: 188454
CCVSampType:
Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 50.00 98.0 80 1205.00 049.0Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 50.00 94.9 80 1205.00 047.4Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 50.00 96.0 80 1205.00 048.0 Surr: o-Terphenyl 40.00 91.1 80 12036.4
Sample ID: LCS-5005
Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/20/2013
Prep Date: 7/18/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 9376
SeqNo: 188455
LCSSampType:
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 20.00 92.5 70 1305.00 018.5Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 10.00 78.5 70 1305.00 07.85Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 10.00 71.5 70 1305.00 07.15Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 10.00 76.6 70 1305.00 07.66Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 10.00 76.1 70 1305.00 07.61 Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 4.000 94.4 65 1403.78
Sample ID: LCS-5005
Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/20/2013
Prep Date: 7/18/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 9376
SeqNo: 188456
LCSSampType:
Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 10.00 74.4 70 1305.00 07.44
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
Page 6 of 13
Project: 306185CLIENT: Friedman & BruyaWork Order: 1307084 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWEPH
7/29/2013Date:
Sample ID: LCS-5005
Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/20/2013
Prep Date: 7/18/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 9376
SeqNo: 188456
LCSSampType:
Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 10.00 73.4 70 1305.00 07.34Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 10.00 72.2 70 1305.00 07.22Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 10.00 74.4 70 1305.00 07.44Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 10.00 73.2 70 1305.00 07.32 Surr: o-Terphenyl 4.000 72.4 65 1402.90
Sample ID: LCSD-5005
Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/20/2013
Prep Date: 7/18/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: LCSS02
RunNo: 9376
SeqNo: 188457
LCSDSampType:
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 20.00 94.2 70 130 205.00 0 18.50 1.8018.8Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 10.00 78.3 70 130 205.00 0 7.849 0.2127.83Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 10.00 73.2 70 130 205.00 0 7.154 2.277.32Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 10.00 75.0 70 130 205.00 0 7.663 2.157.50Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 10.00 74.0 70 130 205.00 0 7.607 2.747.40 Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 4.000 95.3 65 140 03.81
Sample ID: LCSD-5005
Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/20/2013
Prep Date: 7/18/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: LCSS02
RunNo: 9376
SeqNo: 188458
LCSDSampType:
Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 10.00 72.1 70 130 205.00 0 7.439 3.147.21Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 10.00 71.0 70 130 205.00 0 7.341 3.407.10Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 10.00 73.6 70 130 205.00 0 7.215 2.007.36Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 10.00 81.9 70 130 205.00 0 7.442 9.628.19Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 10.00 81.8 70 130 205.00 0 7.320 11.18.18 Surr: o-Terphenyl 4.000 82.4 65 140 03.30
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
Page 7 of 13
Project: 306185CLIENT: Friedman & BruyaWork Order: 1307084 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWEPH
7/29/2013Date:
Sample ID: MB-5005
Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/20/2013
Prep Date: 7/18/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: MBLKS
RunNo: 9376
SeqNo: 188460
MBLKSampType:
Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 5.00NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 5.00NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 5.00NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 5.00NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 5.00ND Surr: o-Terphenyl 4.000 68.2 65 1402.73
Sample ID: MB-5005
Batch ID: 5005 Analysis Date: 7/20/2013
Prep Date: 7/18/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: MBLKS
RunNo: 9376
SeqNo: 188461
MBLKSampType:
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 5.00NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 5.00NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C16) 5.00NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C16-C21) 5.00NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C21-C34) 5.00ND Surr: 1-Chlorooctadecane 4.000 85.2 65 1403.41
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
Page 8 of 13
Project: 306185CLIENT: Friedman & BruyaWork Order: 1307084 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWVPH
7/29/2013Date:
Sample ID: 1307113-001AMS
Batch ID: 5019 Analysis Date: 7/23/2013
Prep Date: 7/22/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg-dry
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 9386
SeqNo: 188654
MSSampType:
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C5-C6) 84.84 90.0 70 130 H0.707 076.3Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C6-C8) 28.28 97.6 70 130 H0.707 4.09131.7Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 28.28 38.9 70 130 SH0.707 33.0444.0Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 28.28 34.2 70 130 SEH0.707 111.7121Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 113.1 80.5 70 130 H0.707 64.13155Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 28.28 67.1 70 130 SEH0.707 281.5300Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C13) 28.28 71.0 70 130 EH0.707 231.0251Benzene 28.28 87.5 70 130 H0.707 024.7Toluene 28.28 88.7 70 130 H0.707 025.1Ethylbenzene 28.28 90.0 70 130 H0.707 025.4m,p-Xylene 56.56 91.2 70 130 H0.707 051.6o-Xylene 28.28 88.7 70 130 H0.707 025.1Naphthalene 28.28 56.2 70 130 SH0.707 6.00921.9Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 28.28 87.2 70 130 H0.707 024.7 Surr: Bromofluorobenzene 3.535 104 65 140 H3.68 Surr: Trifluorotoluene 3.535 84.9 65 140 H3.00
NOTES:S - Outlying QC recoveries were associated with this sample. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Sample ID: 1307085-001ADUP
Batch ID: 5019 Analysis Date: 7/23/2013
Prep Date: 7/22/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg-dry
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 9386
SeqNo: 188659
DUPSampType:
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C5-C6) 0 25 EH0.279 0 20.60 1.6520.9Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C6-C8) 0 25 EH0.279 0 84.38 1.2083.4Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 0 25 EH0.279 0 84.55 7.4291.1Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 0 25 EH0.279 0 50.59 9.9555.9Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 0 25 EH0.279 0 109.6 2.06112Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 0 25 EH0.279 0 133.5 4.12128
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
Page 9 of 13
Project: 306185CLIENT: Friedman & BruyaWork Order: 1307084 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWVPH
7/29/2013Date:
Sample ID: 1307085-001ADUP
Batch ID: 5019 Analysis Date: 7/23/2013
Prep Date: 7/22/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg-dry
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 9386
SeqNo: 188659
DUPSampType:
Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C13) 0 25 EH0.279 0 17.69 3.0217.2Benzene 0 25 H0.279 0 0 0NDToluene 0 25 RH0.279 0 0.4252 27.70.562Ethylbenzene 0 25 H0.279 0 1.208 1.291.22m,p-Xylene 0 25 H0.279 0 2.337 0.2292.34o-Xylene 0 25 H0.279 0 0 0NDNaphthalene 0 25 H0.279 0 1.504 0.8061.49Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 0 25 H0.279 0 0 0ND Surr: Bromofluorobenzene 1.397 101 65 140 H01.41 Surr: Trifluorotoluene 1.397 67.9 65 140 H00.949
NOTES:R - High RPD indicates a possible matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the laboratory control sample (LCS).
Sample ID: LCS-5019
Batch ID: 5019 Analysis Date: 7/22/2013
Prep Date: 7/22/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 9386
SeqNo: 188663
LCSSampType:
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C5-C6) 60.00 82.2 70 1300.500 049.3Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C6-C8) 20.00 95.3 70 1300.500 019.1Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 20.00 87.3 70 1300.500 017.5Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 20.00 112 70 1300.500 022.4Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 80.00 87.5 70 1300.500 070.0Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 20.00 106 70 1300.500 021.1Aromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C13) 20.00 101 70 1300.500 020.1Benzene 20.00 89.4 70 1300.500 017.9Toluene 20.00 89.1 70 1300.500 017.8Ethylbenzene 20.00 89.3 70 1300.500 017.9m,p-Xylene 40.00 89.7 70 1300.500 035.9o-Xylene 20.00 90.1 70 1300.500 018.0
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
Page 10 of 13
Project: 306185CLIENT: Friedman & BruyaWork Order: 1307084 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by NWVPH
7/29/2013Date:
Sample ID: LCS-5019
Batch ID: 5019 Analysis Date: 7/22/2013
Prep Date: 7/22/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 9386
SeqNo: 188663
LCSSampType:
Naphthalene 20.00 110 70 1300.500 022.0Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 20.00 96.1 70 1300.500 019.2 Surr: Bromofluorobenzene 2.500 107 65 1402.68 Surr: Trifluorotoluene 2.500 105 65 1402.63
Sample ID: MB-5019
Batch ID: 5019 Analysis Date: 7/22/2013
Prep Date: 7/22/2013
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: mg/Kg
RL
Client ID: MBLKS
RunNo: 9386
SeqNo: 188664
MBLKSampType:
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (C5-C6) 00.500 0NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C6-C8) 00.500 0NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 00.500 0NDAliphatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 00.500 0NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C8-C10) 00.500 0NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C10-C12) 00.500 0NDAromatic Hydrocarbon (C12-C13) 00.500 0NDBenzene 00.500 0NDToluene 00.500 0NDEthylbenzene 00.500 0NDm,p-Xylene 00.500 0NDo-Xylene 00.500 0NDNaphthalene 00.500 0NDMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 00.500 0ND Surr: Bromofluorobenzene 2.500 108 65 1402.70 Surr: Trifluorotoluene 2.500 109 65 1402.73
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
Page 11 of 13
Date Received: 7/16/2013 2:00:00 PM
Client Name: FB Work Order Number: 1307084
Sample Log-In Check List
Chelsea WardLogged by:
Item Information
How was the sample delivered? Courier
Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes No Not Present
Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes No NA
Are samples properly preserved? Yes No
Was preservative added to bottles? Yes No NA
Did all samples containers arrive in good condition(unbroken)? Yes No
Does paperwork match bottle labels? Yes No
Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody? Yes No
Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes No
Is the headspace in the VOA vials? Yes No NA
1.2.
6.
10.11.
12.13.14.
15.16.17. Were all holding times able to be met? Yes No
Chain of Custody
Log In
7. Were all coolers received at a temperature of >0°C to 10.0°C Yes No NA
8. Sample(s) in proper container(s)? Yes No
9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)? Yes No
Special Handling (if applicable)
18.
19.
Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order? Yes No NA
Person Notified: Date:
Regarding:
Via: eMail Phone Fax In Person
Additional remarks:
Client Instructions:
By Whom:
Coolers are present? Yes No NA3.Sample kept in fridge until pick-up.
Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No4.Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No Not Required5.
Item # Temp ºC ConditionSample 9.8 Good
Page 12 of 13
Page 13 of 13
ll
8 J o d o g r F t4 r F k d >
o o d I F Ir t> t< p I
o 'g q p !l t L lo tcl IF
T g o :* b E l! o x :rF
vl = .U F m o - P - o 'tl o c 0 -| o I \ rt",
iq-
Fl ( t\e I
\^) e
*S g.
\ h f\\)
\
*-.
t o
f1
m o z 3e
g,
9,
r//
-$ J
, o 3 , E
fllLl
-l+F ft
T
ot
t 2
ii
6tr
a?
2 o ) 8a
d2
E}
=o
(D
c
x3 = rn
n c J o J o (o o o c J o o o ct :<
Fd
FF
O Itr
9o
3I
+
!E
.Ef;
- HE
s9
5
3 I
r r
sil
E E
E t ;
tH
B
N "'
ir
F $
$ * t
$|
H ,{
ilf
'
3.=
n o o o o o o x
v o f o c t o o o
F o o 9.
o o o
v o I 5. d o
-{ s4 o z { F m
v \ Ir
t\ t\ c ) 7 t B {
! ! z z I n
u ! F ! o c, o a) o =' I
}J $I ) v )) I ! z
E I y1
\ \ w
o m
o$ vl
= tt
(t o f o n o o o .o
o o 3 o o l t to lc D lo TN to H lil to n.
lo
o ; o I !J t ID lo to
'9 J o f o r* b B o x :t
I I
J tr
sil
g E
E t ;
iI
u N
I i
rE
[ $
€ $
sI
I s
F 6
F;
H **
er
'+
=
tfi Vr 3 ! F |lt o - P - o at o G v, o (, -? Fr'
q O.
w '.tS t. ,l(\
t N s t U
n s ! I F 4
p lu r lf lri
;l \t
L., .r I ) -it
ilJ iJ p w N a
JJ p u I ,r[, )
p [J u I )J a
I v U I I1
p v I
F ts i iv
l
6 o 3 ! d C'
I
I i5,
iN lsti I f-
o \J riF
IO
J 5E
N c0;
J1"A
J+
j 4
J.,N c
4c
JIsf
,t
\9 tsF
)\c
sI
tJtl
;1 {
r rn6
g
= wflr
v/ od
r s ui"^
JF c
^/ .ll 'i
-r)
trt 1
u N;i }J r/
i9J U!J =o,
p
fltot-
t.3 *
ul-
oF
iN
t{IP
H-D
x
z 6 m UI - 6 C n 2 t|l I
,((
)x
x,*
NT
{T?
H.G
X
xt
x(
It
BIE
Xb
y t0
2lt
VO
C'r
by
t26
0
SV
OC
'r W
lfl,
TO
tClA
.t
m.lo
lt
(E
- 3 O
I
n rfl 3 v 7l at
-1 d
oh
oa z
e*
ri
dp
-0 -0
(
(/,
! m n v1 c!.
(o J o -
\ \\
o an 3 u, z
! o :t
I(g
dF
siE
s19
a*3O
H€
3 s
gii
-'
g o f O{
oc
d.2
i\>
'-n
EO
oc x6 = tn
F
F c J o q o o o c = 9. N o o u
:k I I IN l-
o
n o o o ?'
o o .g
4 g l € t o o g
v o o o o o ct x
\ J
4 g f € d o o S tl
I
2 o z a m
v \ \'
C -) r t C .U ) .T T )
! 4, z z 3 rn
g B ! I rl 8 c
p b )
a G c ) -t Ir f
o o 3 ! z
g l lq\
\ \ t^,
I nt
Io n
\\ H
= 1r
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
Friedman and Bruya, Inc. #306186
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
James E. Bruya, Ph.D. 3012 16th Avenue West Yelena Aravkina, M.S. Seattle, WA 98119-2029 Michael Erdahl, B.S. (206) 285-8282 Kurt Johnson, B.S. [email protected] Eric Young, B.S. www.friedmanandbruya.com
June 27, 2013 Ryan Bixby, Project Manager SoundEarth Strategies 2811 Fairview Ave. East, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98102 Dear Mr. Bixby: Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on June 12, 2013 from the TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306186 project. There are 7 pages included in this report. Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for disposal in 30 days. If you would like us to return your samples or arrange for long term storage at our offices, please contact us as soon as possible. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you should have any questions. Sincerely, FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
Michael Erdahl Project Manager Enclosures c: Audrey Hackett, Beau Johnson SOU0627R.DOC
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
1
CASE NARRATIVE This case narrative encompasses samples received on June 12, 2013 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the SoundEarth Strategies TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306186 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID’s listed below. Laboratory ID SoundEarth Strategies 306186 -01 B26-19 306186 -02 B26-35 306186 -03 B26-40 306186 -04 B30-22.5 306186 -05 B30-25 306186 -06 B30-27 306186 -07 B30-32 306186 -08 B30-36 306186 -09 B30-40 306186 -10 B27-23.5 306186 -11 B27-28.5 306186 -12 B27-30 306186 -13 B27-35 306186 -14 B27-40 306186 -15 B25-10 306186 -16 B25-18 306186 -17 B25-20 306186 -18 B25-25 306186 -19 B25-27.5 306186 -20 B25-30 306186 -21 B25-35 Sample B25-30 was not received in a 5035 sampling container. The data were flagged accordingly. All other quality control requirements were acceptable.
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
2
Date of Report: 06/27/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306186 Date Extracted: 06/21/13 Date Analyzed: 06/21/13
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING METHODS 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Ethyl Total Gasoline Surrogate Sample ID Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Range (% Recovery) Laboratory ID (Limit 50-150) B26-35 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 90 306186-02
B30-25 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 92 306186-05
B30-27 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 87 306186-06
B30-32 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 88 306186-07
B27-28.5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 89 306186-11
B27-35 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 85 306186-13
B27-40 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 90 306186-14
B25-18 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 98 306186-16
B25-20 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 87 306186-17 B25-30 pc <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 93 306186-20
B25-35 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 91 306186-21
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
3
Date of Report: 06/27/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306186 Date Extracted: 06/21/13 Date Analyzed: 06/21/13
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING METHODS 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Ethyl Total Gasoline Surrogate Sample ID Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Range (% Recovery) Laboratory ID (Limit 50-150) Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 87 03-1097 MB
Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 85 03-1159 MB
Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 89 03-1202 MB
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
4
Date of Report: 06/27/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306186
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES, AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING METHOD 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Laboratory Code: 306186-02 (Duplicate) Analyte
Reporting
Units
Sample Result
(Wet Wt)
Duplicate Result
(Wet Wt)
RPD
(Limit 20) Benzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Toluene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) <0.06 <0.06 nm Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) <2 <2 nm Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Analyte
Reporting
Units
Spike Level
Percent Recovery
LCS
Acceptance
Criteria Benzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 90 66-121 Toluene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 89 72-128 Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 91 69-132 Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) 1.5 93 69-131 Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) 20 95 61-153
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
5
Date of Report: 06/27/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306186
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES, AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING EPA METHOD 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Laboratory Code: 306265-01 (Duplicate) Analyte
Reporting
Units
Sample Result
(Wet Wt)
Duplicate Result
(Wet Wt)
RPD
(Limit 20) Benzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Toluene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) <0.06 <0.06 nm Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) <2 <2 nm Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Analyte
Reporting
Units
Spike Level
Percent Recovery
LCS
Acceptance
Criteria Benzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 79 69-120 Toluene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 79 70-117 Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 84 65-123 Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) 1.5 84 66-120 Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) 20 85 71-131
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
6
Date of Report: 06/27/13 Date Received: 06/12/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20130612 WORFDB7, F&BI 306186
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES, AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING EPA METHOD 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Laboratory Code: 306186-21 (Duplicate) Analyte
Reporting
Units
Sample Result
(Wet Wt)
Duplicate Result
(Wet Wt)
RPD
(Limit 20) Benzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Toluene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) <0.02 <0.02 nm Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) <0.06 <0.06 nm Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) <2 <2 nm Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Analyte
Reporting
Units
Spike Level
Percent Recovery
LCS
Acceptance
Criteria Benzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 89 69-120 Toluene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 90 70-117 Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 95 65-123 Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) 1.5 94 66-120 Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) 20 95 71-131
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
7
Data Qualifiers & Definitions a - The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.
A1 – More than one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probability.
b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix spike recoveries may not be meaningful.
ca - The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an estimate.
c - The presence of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.
d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits may be raised due to dilution.
ds - The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may not be meaningful.
dv - Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised accordingly.
fb - Analyte present in the blank and the sample.
fc – The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant.
hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity.
ht - Analysis performed outside the method or client-specified holding time requirement.
ip - Recovery fell outside of normal control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the quantitation of the analyte.
j – The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate.
J - The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration is an estimate.
jl - The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
jr - The rpd result in laboratory control sample associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
js - The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
lc - The presence of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination.
L - The reported concentration was generated from a library search.
nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the RPD is not applicable.
pc – The sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should be considered an estimate.
pr – The sample was received with incorrect preservation. The value reported should be considered an estimate.
ve - Estimated concentration calculated for an analyte response above the valid instrument calibration range. A dilution is required to obtain an accurate quantification of the analyte.
vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte.
x - The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation.
gt*
t, 3 l ts I I I lv,
lo tl lm lg IT lv1
l+ lo t+ lo (o 16
'l- I I I I I I I I I I I
o N @ T v 3.
o { l< lo tm
O -vr
!D !l 'o
f f o I I IN l? t(, t? IG t8 I I I I I 'Tt o x
rn 3 ! F m o - P z o 'n o G 0 o c \ a.l
q s\ \ t" \ \, s $
il LJ t' I \./
0 U "tJ
I ,../$ }J + ! p qb
J.r
N +.J
I p w
"^l
rl
w I r cJ
F NI
!I i U.J
6'
tlrJ
n vJ t)
T N -r I }J rl
-li
F JJ i. )J f\
el
il \}J n I p N ,4
<\ N \\.\
\J b'
I F
-i N U u t \}J
0 L) bt
t o 3 g o c,
$l \ t'
i-
l I
Wl
r i
iLl
/ i
f, l
Vi I
-l l.J.J
('I ).)
c
F{
o5 HX
,.)''
i!
i
J]iw C
rH n
ili
\Pl
.Air
i I I
( \l
!v'
lr.
:v
:.)t U
p +lu J'
\ I
U U rl
J O,.J 4
-sF
gE
E.
-o
ils)
oa s
Q )OJ
,J fo
) rN
) n9 t C
i\o
$
s -s | 1.,
9o
PO
Fo
o
,N d"\, N rj
! C
N /f
'r-
/ I
: l'J
-: p a,u
it
/l I
r}n -c ../
lc
^i
{}
,n
v'
W
nr
n
J iU
.Jo
io 1
[- ;t ro o,
)\= o x
U)
Fi
NW
TP
H-D
x
z vr EI
3t,
- m o m v, fll E,
YY
i\ix
(.r
t.X
NW
IPH
-Gx
X.
\i
(B
TE
X
by
80
21
8
VO
C's
by
82
60
SV
OC
's by
82
70
RC
RA
-E M
elq
ls
I
\-
t- p isf
r
n m 3 v 7 (./,
nI
L-I
mc
iO (\z
o*
/{ \z
ut9
-s
= f, d q o d
a.-.
s* $m (/
)
z
-
=d
9s5
E
'{
9o
3=
dd
Hf,
I
ec
l
$ su
(t, o' O
ro
cA
Nv
zi
i>
'-
n:
oo
cg
z-
= rn
n c
n f o f v d o c + :t N o o
i*tI$
F s : t
$H
[dn o o a
.o o o
nl
ot Fi
ci
fl ol
oi
o;
-<
i q I I ! I
nl
oi
ol
a.i
<i
ol
<i
.'
t I I.
l4
(,
1 I
lt
Ir
it
ll
i
\i
\i i
n E f g.
J o o o :
\-\ h-\ \
(, o z c n m
Lry \ $
i.
-J
o C ') + 3 I # .] tr
T n z -{ z = m
\ f $
. l',
(-)
C iJ t(\ it'it
i$ i1 i< i<
-i)
3 T z
\ \0 -{ rn
rt N (tl
= rn
(t)
ra t-t
I K I l,\
-,
c)
t, o Ct \ 6\
fr
3o
ol
a
lr
tN
ll
@l
l-
lal-
' 19
t?'
t6to
tA
'l€
ti
FI
Jl<
tq
lo
lxt
to
l{
oI
lo'
ll
-t
lt
lt
ll
lt
lt
lt
lr
l
O ; + o- + I t\ T aJl o o + = o
T J ) o * l." to t$ t(,
lo to.
ll
l.O to to I T x
v, = T 7 tft o - P z o 'tt o c TA
-l o I \ cfl o \\ : \-,
p "r
8o
\)
i;\ s
si )Jl
4:
lt
,pl
.t\ |T
JU 4 I s ,
t
"l.J
f. Jl s .4
r'l N $ tl I \ 4
(l N \r]
Jl I \
-)./
N A \rl
I ts
N U 4 ! o
-N v tJ I |. p "1
N u *j I O
vr o 3 g o E'
JJ L" ,^
uil
! n
f \,, $i
F6
OJ gE
I.
U ul
JJ l\.
tl
\J
i.
,i
",
+l.
v i
!'
i
^l
nn
ir
l1,\
z./
i:
I,
i:
^n
j
ci
-i
s
UiJ
ll
J\
i
Bg
EE
I tr dr
5 P \N
5A
Ja
\t\L I (n
Eg
|-'
I I i
6- = ;
v, .tr,
3c
l
to
o
i i I I ti ,l
t:
i Ui
i"\j
i'.0
.t
l
/) }J;
l ot- ul
fi
(. CI
lr)
Lt/ fr
dl wI
v, 9=
€3
Fo
q
I:
)
iF-+
A il'-
;U ;-
3 o * x
l ti
ti
idp
t-iv
lF
AN
WT
PH
-Dx
z Vr
m vl v tn o tn ta m
Go
\t
xN
tlfT
PH
-Gx
co
Xt
XB
IEX
by
80
21
8
:l
VO
C's
by
82
60
SV
OC
's by
82
70
RC
RA
-8 Me
lols
I
r?
*l'F
= {*
I i*\
s ?
n r n T l.^j o
_\
(./l 3 -o t- rn n a/, d
rn (./, z
(/l O
-r
^-
rc
4Z
F>
<x
<\.
,,(
DC
AZ rt
l
n c f o :t o J N o x
pg
=9
--
O)
9o
3d
d#
I e
o;1
'9
0;
g
= : { J e o 6'
J
3
s i
s g
ilE
E E
i ;r
f U
N I
is
.$
g *
€ 5
€B
F
s
F b
.d;
H 'f
i';.
.o
3
'o =
_
n o o a,
o x
n 9. j' o g,
f o o o .</
'.t I t
ni
oi
oi
a.i
<i
oi
ni
o!
.<
i ir
lt
l
t-l
it
td
t,
lt
t
Ir
Jf
ll
tt
li
\t
i\
l\
i)
i I ! i
n g l g,
o : t--
i\_ $ {\
(, ^ z i n rn
l---r
! I
\i ,'
l
\jt
\l
\l
*i
! I i I I I i Ii
il
i) >,
A 5 f ) l. s p I 2 T f *)
1' 4. z -.1 z rn
I I | ),
/l-
P IF iN i\
! i i
LN a c fit H
l) T
T z S \ w
o m
! I I I
-f-
NJ \n
_- = rn
U)
1) n Fl
!'t I I c)
Draft‐ Issued for Client Review
SoundEarth Strategies, Inc. December 30, 2013
Friedman and Bruya, Inc. #311382
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
James E. Bruya, Ph.D. 3012 16th Avenue West Yelena Aravkina, M.S. Seattle, WA 98119-2029 Michael Erdahl, B.S. (206) 285-8282 Kurt Johnson, B.S. [email protected] Eric Young, B.S. www.friedmanandbruya.com
December 10, 2013 Ryan Bixby, Project Manager SoundEarth Strategies 2811 Fairview Ave. East, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98102 Dear Mr. Bixby: Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on November 20, 2013 from the TOC_01-399_20131120 WORFDB7, F&BI 311382 project. There are 4 pages included in this report. Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for disposal in 30 days. If you would like us to return your samples or arrange for long term storage at our offices, please contact us as soon as possible. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you should have any questions. Sincerely, FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
Michael Erdahl Project Manager Enclosures c: Audrey Hackett, Beau Johnson SOU1210R.DOC
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
1
CASE NARRATIVE This case narrative encompasses samples received on November 20, 2013 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the SoundEarth Strategies TOC_01-399_20131120 WORFDB7, F&BI 311382 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID’s listed below. Laboratory ID SoundEarth Strategies 311382 -01 B31-15 311382 -02 B31-20 311382 -03 B31-22.5 311382 -04 B31-25 311382 -05 AS04- 22.5 311382 -06 AS04- 25.5 311382 -07 AS04- 27.5 311382 -08 AS04- 37 All quality control requirements were acceptable.
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
2
Date of Report: 12/10/13 Date Received: 11/20/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20131120 WORFDB7, F&BI 311382 Date Extracted: 11/27/13 Date Analyzed: 11/27/13
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING METHODS 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Ethyl Total Gasoline Surrogate Sample ID Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Range (% Recovery) Laboratory ID (Limit 50-150) B31-20 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 109 311382-02
B31-22.5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 110 311382-03
Method Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 <2 108 03-2408 MB
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
3
Date of Report: 12/10/13 Date Received: 11/20/13 Project: TOC_01-399_20131120 WORFDB7, F&BI 311382
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES, AND TPH AS GASOLINE USING EPA METHOD 8021B AND NWTPH-Gx
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Analyte
Reporting
Units
Spike Level
Percent Recovery
LCS
Percent Recovery
LCSD
Acceptance
Criteria
RPD
(Limit 20) Benzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 84 84 69-120 0 Toluene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 90 90 70-117 0 Ethylbenzene mg/kg (ppm) 0.5 96 95 65-123 1 Xylenes mg/kg (ppm) 1.5 94 93 66-120 1 Gasoline mg/kg (ppm) 20 100 100 71-131 0
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. _________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
4
Data Qualifiers & Definitions a - The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.
A1 – More than one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probability.
b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix spike recoveries may not be meaningful.
ca - The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an estimate.
c - The presence of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.
d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits may be raised due to dilution.
ds - The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may not be meaningful.
dv - Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised accordingly.
fb - Analyte present in the blank and the sample.
fc – The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant.
hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity.
ht - Analysis performed outside the method or client-specified holding time requirement.
ip - Recovery fell outside of normal control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix inter fered with the quantitation of the analyte.
j – The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate.
J - The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration is an estimate.
jl - The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
jr - The rpd result in laboratory control sample associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
js - The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
lc - The presence of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination.
L - The reported concentration was generated from a library search.
nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the RPD is not applicable.
pc – The sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should be considered an estimate.
pr – The sample was received with incorrect preservation. The value reported should be considered an estimate.
ve - Estimated concentration calculated for an analyte response above the valid instrument calibration range. A dilution is required to obtain an accurate quantification of the analyte.
vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte.
x - The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation.
o 3 - ) r I l(/', lo lf lo lm lo lf lr lq
, lo lo'
{o to l- I I I I I I I I I I
lo
J-
.n
YS
oJ
-
aa
o+
d'
,2
lo
'l
lE
Nl
Nl+
,T
l=
t(,
I t-
lS
|.
la
FF
FI
l"=
lrI
lsl9
d'
to
toX
,l
N
lr
n,+
'l
19
tt
t+
I
rl
I
18
'l
Ih
tl
to
tl
t?
t
I
l€
ll
tt
ll
'l
v, 3 T m o - u o at o c v, o I (\ tt
I s I
\^s
$ F
ul o 3 E o - Ff
OJ
gE gH 3o
**
ct
m a/,
F ln o c m a,/,
m 0
BT
EX
b
y 8
02
18
SV
OC
's by
82
70
aT
3t
1f,
.l-
q
ol
v\
,\
l
n m .P-.
.n . (-
/, I I I I I I I I
-r
ro
to
-1.
L
o'
i5,
z
U :q
\z
dl
v-S t-
l(
, - rn n (, 6 (o-'
l o
\,rd
l..''\
\\ ,r
\\\
I\
\l
'l
rl
Nl
r\
lr
\\
|
TN (./,
z
.s
I l:*
el=
Y-t
4l
oS
Xl
Qi
Vu
tl
:o
O
){.
Q o
3+
<-
-J
-
A
-
J\
Vf
.\
-o
h
=
\J
=
Ya
b
xx
=
x-Y
x
-'>
(/)
o' l O-
+
^2
,
F>
>n
a-
Y6
m
n c UI -
n c :r o J d o c J o N o r :
3
d i
F s
ilZ
:
: f.
i.
.,q
x
.N
N
=
_
i
2
E g
i $
dS
rs
N
E
E E
)
>tr
i 5
$ €
g€
F
5 s
F b
0;
I
5
=g
X
s-i
9
n o o o o fJ 5
ln
lo
t:
l!
lo
l-
t<
t"
ln
lo
lo
le
.t
<t
ol
o N N tl \tl
nl
o
t!
tl
-
Iil
lo
t-
\N \l
\ \
l'
l $lV1 z = - T|
R \ I \ \ N \
J LI JJ
I
: 2 3 rT
T ts\ rh \ r.
lo o = z
s SS \
o .< rn
$o f$. I
= = m