supplementary geoenvironmental report … · 2016-07-04 · hsg47 avoiding danger from underground...

SUPPLEMENTARY GEOENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

GEOTECHNICAL CATEGORY 1

WHERRY SCHOOL, NORWICH

FOR KIER CONSTRUCTION

DELTA-SIMONS PROJECT NO. 15-1091.02

ISSUED MAY 2016

FINAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Authorisation .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Context & Purpose ........................................................................................... 1 1.3 Scope ............................................................................................................... 3

2.0 INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY .................................................................... 4 2.1 Desk Study....................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Conceptual Site Model ..................................................................................... 4 2.3 Planning, Setting Out & Services, Presentation ............................................... 5 2.4 Trial Pits ........................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Standpipe Installations ..................................................................................... 6 2.6 Static Cone Penetration Tests ......................................................................... 6 2.7 BRE365 Soakaway Testing ............................................................................. 6 2.8 Chemical Analysis ............................................................................................ 7 2.9 Geotechnical Testing ....................................................................................... 7 2.10 Screening Assessment Criteria ...................................................................... 7

3.0 RESULTS & INTERPRETATION ......................................................................... 8 3.1 Desk Study Summary ...................................................................................... 8 3.2 Fieldworks Interpretation .................................................................................. 9

4.0 LIMITATIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS ................................... 15

Tables

Table 1 Initial Conceptual Site Model & Risk Assessment

Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Plan Figure 2 Approximate Locations of Investigations

Appendices Appendix I Geoenvironmental Report Appendix II Risk Definitions Appendix III Key to Logs, Field Records & Compliance Certificates Appendix IV CPT Report Appendix V Chemical Analysis Appendix VI Generic Assessment Criteria

FINAL

SUPPLEMENTARY GEOENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

GEOTECHNICAL CATEGORY 1


FOR KIER CONSTRUCTION

DELTA-SIMONS PROJECT NO. 15-1091.02

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Authorisation

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Limited (Delta-Simons) was instructed by

Kier Construction (the “Client”) to carry out a site investigation at the proposed new

Wherry School, Norwich (hereafter referred to as the “Site”), prior to redevelopment

comprising construction of low-rise educational buildings. The civil/structural

consultants for the project were Mott MacDonald (the “Engineer”). The location of this

Site is shown on Figure 1.

1.2 Context & Purpose

At the time of the work, the land concerned had not been identified as requiring

detailed investigation for the purposes of planning associated with either

contaminated or unstable land.

There is an existing Delta-Simons report relating to the project which comprises the

main characterisation for geotechnical and environmental purposes. The existing

report is referenced below and is understood to be submitted as part of the planning

process and in support of discharge of pre-commencement conditions. It is also

presented in Appendix I of this report.

Geo-environmental Report, Geotechnical Category 1, Proposed New

Development Hewett School, Norwich for Mace Group, Delta Simons Project

No. 15-1091.01 - Issued: February 2016.

The existing report contained a review of a third-party desk study report.

The existing reports have been considered by the Client to be not sufficient in detail

for their purposes. As a result a supplementary report was required to address this.

The proposed development layout had changed slightly since the existing report.

The purpose of this investigation was to undertake a supplementary limited appraisal

of the geo-environmental ground conditions and obtain data on chemical and

Summary Geoenvironmental Report Wherry School, Norwich Delta-Simons Project Number 15-1091.02 Page 2

FINAL

geotechnical parameters at the Site for use by the Client considering potential

development planning, design and engineering for construction.

This Report is intended as a Geotechnical Category 1 report in accordance with

British Standard BSEN1997-1:2004 Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design – Part 1:

General rules, or as part of a preliminary investigation in a Geotechnical Category 2

situation.

The particular targets of the supplementary work were as follows:

Characterisation of contaminants at increased density to existing report;

Assessment of pavements/asphalt for hazardous waste characterisation;

Foundations for low-rise structures;

Suitability for surface water discharge to land via traditional soakaways; and

Pavement design.

The Engineers provided minimum requirements for provision of soakaway and CBR

data.

This Report has been based on a brief review of existing reports together with

fieldworks comprising soil sampling and in-situ geotechnical testing. Selected soil

samples were scheduled for laboratory chemical analysis and geotechnical testing.

The results of the review, and the sampling/testing with the relevant laboratory work

have been presented in the Appendices.

The methods have been described in Section 2.

The interpretation of the results has been presented as a table in Section 3 with, a

conceptual site model (CSM) and initial risk assessment based on the source-

pathway-receptor principle and recommendations for aspects of planning design and

construction.

Using the data in this Report, engineers may be able to design foundations using

methods as described in Building Regulations/Standards, National House Building

Council (NHBC) Standards, Building Research Establishment (BRE) guidance or if

appropriate BS 8103-1:1995 Structural design of low-rise buildings — Part 1: Code of


FINAL

practice for stability, site investigation, foundations and ground floor slabs for

housing.

Delta-Simons have also provided further recommendations with respect to the

ground conditions for the assistance of the engineer as designer.

1.3 Scope

The scope of works performed for this Report comprised the following:

Existing report review;

Soil sampling;

In-situ penetration testing;

In-situ permeability testing;

Laboratory testing (chemical analysis);

Contamination assessment; and

Geotechnical assessment.

According to BSEN1997-1, Geotechnical Category 1 (GC1) should only include small

and relatively simple structures for which it is possible to ensure that the fundamental

requirements will be satisfied on the basis of experience and qualitative geotechnical

investigations; - with negligible risk. The designer/engineer is responsible for

checking the Client’s requirements for compliance with the Eurocodes, and GC1.

This Report may exceed the minimum standards by inclusion of quantitative data to

support experience in making recommendations.


FINAL

2.0 INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY

2.1 Desk Study

Guidance on desk study practice and interpretation for contaminated land is provided

in British Standard BS10175:2011 Code of practice for investigation of potentially

contaminated sites, and the Environment Agency (EA) publication CLR11 “Model

Procedures for the management of land contamination”, plus associated documents

including Department of the Environment Industry Profiles.

The Client provided report presents the main desk study and characterisation for the

Site.

Desk study practice for geotechnical aspects is described in British Standard

BS5930:1999+A2:2010 Code of practice for site investigations, and to a limited

extent in British Standard BSEN1997-2:2004 Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design –

Part 2: Ground investigation and testing. As part of a limited investigation, the full

requirements of a geotechnical desk study may not be completed.

2.2 Conceptual Site Model

A conceptual exposure model represents the relationships between contaminant

sources, pathways and receptors, to support the identification and assessment of

possible pollutant linkages (PPL) - and an assessment of known pollutant linkages,

where identified from existing information.

Where PPLs are identified, a preliminary risk assessment is carried out to assess the

likelihood that each possible linkage exists and to decide whether these pose

potentially unacceptable risks to identified receptors and require further assessment.

Where this linkage is of a form that subsequently leads to land being identified as

‘contaminated land’ under the terms of Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act

(EPA) 1990, the linkage is termed a significant pollutant linkage.

At the preliminary risk assessment stage, which is usually based upon desk top

information, the decision on whether a PPL poses a potentially unacceptable risk is

based upon professional judgement. The significance of the PPL will also be

determined dependant on the context of the land use and the purpose of the

assessment.


FINAL

Assessing risks from land contamination underpins the “suitable for use” approach

adopted for Part 2A of the EPA 1990 regulatory regime and the National Planning

Policy Framework (NPPF), March 2012.

Based on the information obtained from this assessment, a preliminary risk

assessment using the source-pathway-receptor approach has been formulated,

which identifies PPLs at the Site in the context of the proposed end-use. The existing

report is provided in Appendix I

A revised CSM and preliminary risk assessment is presented at the end of Section 3

and it takes into account the relevant new findings of the field and laboratory

outcomes. Appendix II contains risk definitions adopted in this Report.

2.3 Planning, Setting Out & Services, Presentation

Unless otherwise stated, the investigation has been planned on a scope of works

agreed with the Client which is typically based on multiples of one day on-Site with

various drilling and sampling equipment, or a measured amount of drilling and

testing.

Clients are requested to provide all service plans in original form from suppliers so a

services risk assessment can be undertaken as part of a formal Site-specific Health

and Safety Plan. The services risk assessment is based on guidance provided in

HSG47 Avoiding danger from underground services.

Exploratory hole and subsequent sample locations were selected to provide suitable

coverage of the Site, having regard for the likely presence of services and any other

site-specific constraints such as existing structures and finishes. Where applicable,

suspected emissions locations, or geology variations may have been targeted.

Prior to any excavation, a cable detector was used at sampling positions to avoid

electric cables and hand tools were used as though services were located close by.

For this project, cable and service avoidance was provided by a third party specialist

company with electrodetection and ground probing radar who also obtained

coordinates using a global positioning system.


FINAL

The locations of the investigations are shown on Figure 2 and the field records are

provided in Appendix III.

2.4 Trial Pits

Trial pits are mentioned in Eurocodes, and the relevant British Standard BSENISO

22475-1:2006 Geotechnical investigation and testing – Sampling methods and

groundwater measurements – Part 1: Technical principles for execution. However,

they are not specifically covered in detail compared to most borehole systems. Block

sampling from trial pits is covered in BSENISO 22475-1:2006, but such sampling has

not been necessary for this project.

In the absence of full Eurocode guidance, trial pits are undertaken generally in

accordance with British Standard BS5930:1999+A2:2010 Code of practice for site

investigations & other relevant publications such as BRE Digest 381 Site

investigation for low-rise building: trial pits.

For this project, trial pitting was achieved by mechanical excavator and by hand

tools.

2.5 Standpipe Installations

No new standpipes were installed.

2.6 Static Cone Penetration Tests

Static cone penetration testing is undertaken generally in accordance with

International Standard ISO/FDIS 22476-1 2012.

Full details of the methodology and the results are contained in the specialist

subcontractor’s report contained in Appendix IV.

2.7 BRE365 Soakaway Testing

Soakaway testing is not covered in Eurocodes. In the absence of such guidance, the

standard methodology is taken from BRE Digest 365 Soakaway design. A trial pit is

excavated with a mechanical excavator to the required depth. A gravel pack is then

installed along with two monitoring pipes. The remaining hole is backfilled with

arisings. The gravel pack is filled with water and the water level measured at suitable

intervals until either sufficiently empty or the time exceeds twenty four hours. The

test is repeated three times, unless instructed otherwise, and the infiltration rate


FINAL

calculated following BRE365 methods. The results are presented graphically as

infiltration rate.

2.8 Chemical Analysis

The results of the chemical analysis are presented in Appendix V.

2.9 Geotechnical Testing

No geotechnical testing was undertaken in the laboratory.

2.10 Screening Assessment Criteria

In the absence of a full regulatory set of screening values derived using the new

CLEA Framework, this Report will refer to the following:

The new Soil Guidance Values (SGVs) published by the Environment

Agency;

Former SGVs for which no updated SGV has been published;

The 2009 Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH)/Land Quality

Management (LQM) Generic Assessment Criteria (GAC);

The guidance values produced by the Environmental Industries Commission

(EIC), the Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists

(AGS) and Contaminated Land: Application in Real Environments (CL:AIRE)

in December 2009; and

In house Generic Screening Values (HH-GSVs) and other non UK values

where considered relevant.

These guidance values are presented in Appendix VI.


FINAL

3.0 RESULTS & INTERPRETATION

3.1 Desk Study Summary

To avoid unnecessary repetition, a brief desk study summary has been presented. Site Description & Walkover

A walkover was performed to assess the property for the fieldwork, setting out and observation for relevant aspects. No changes were observed in the land condition since the existing report. In brief the Site comprised approximately 1.4 hectare rectangle of school field open space of slightly sloping grass with an asphalt games court in the north-centre area. The main school buildings were located north of the Site, with a modern commercial football pitch facility “Goals” situated to the south. To the west was the A140 Ipswich Road, and to the west was the rest of the school playing fields.

Map Geology & Commentary (British Geological Survey (BGS) 1:50,000 Scale Online Mapping)

The BGS mapping shows the Site is situated on superficial deposits of the Lowestoft Formation (Diamicton). The underlying bedrock geology is Crag Group (Sand and Gravel). Leet Hill Sand and Gravel Member is shown off-Site to the north. Historical small-scale mineral extraction has been recorded off-Site There is no evidence in the mapping researched that the Site has been affected. A low risk of dissolution features was identified.

Topographic Elevation (OS Map)

Approximately 35 to 37 m above Ordnance Datum (m aOD).

Depth to Groundwater (Interpretation from OS Map, Geology)

Assumed to be at least 20 m below the surface.

Key Contaminants and CSM Aspects

The Site does not have a clearly identified significant former industrial land use and there are no related key contaminants. The Site comprised a grass landscaped school field, with an existing playing court with asphalt surfacing. On-Site potential sources of contamination include:

Potential Made Ground below hardstanding; and Unknown demolition including the potential for asbestos

containing material (ACM) in soil. Off-Site potential sources of contamination are considered small, distant or are unlikely to have affected the Site. No significant sources of ground gas have been identified on/off-Site. The Site is on the boundary between a Secondary A/Secondary


FINAL

Undifferentiated Aquifer with respect to superficial geology, and Principal Aquifer with respect to the bedrock geology. The Site is within an SPZ; Zone 2. Redevelopment is proposed that will introduce sensitive receptors. The surrounding area was subject to WWII bombing but there was no evidence that the Site area was affected. There is uncertainty because unrecorded potentially contaminative activities could have taken place.

3.2 Fieldworks Interpretation

Scope of Investigation

Hand excavated trial pits – 36 No. (including 15 No. pilot holes prepared for CPT). Mechanical excavator trial pits – 3 No. for soakaway tests. Static cone penetrometer tests – 15 No. Site area – 1.4 ha approximately.

Geology from the Trial Pits

Hand excavated trial pits encountered topsoil and made ground to depths between 0.2 m and 1.2 m depth below existing ground level (typically 0.4 m depth). Made Ground generally comprised topsoil of clay, sand and gravel with fragments of brick. Topsoil was differentiated from Made Ground by appearance and the observed absence of man-made items. Beneath topsoil and made ground, natural brown clay or sand was recorded before each trial pit was terminated. Occasionally the hand auger was used to extend the trial pit below 1.0 m depth. Groundwater was not encountered during field work. The natural soil was considered to be representative of the published geology for the Site and similar to the findings of the existing report.

Static Cone Penetration Test Data

The static cone penetration test data provides a laboratory quality measurement of soil resistance to a constant rate of penetration at 1 cm intervals (a frequency of 100 per metre). The frequent data collection at high quality allows for soil engineering parameters to be derived with a higher degree of confidence than traditional techniques. Furthermore, the soil measurements are made without introducing sampling uncertainty and associated variables. By inspection of the CPT data, the resistance measurements show variable ground conditions of generally stiff clay with medium dense sand layers. Some silts are also reported. The CPTs do also reveal occasional soft conditions in the influence of new traditional foundations. The CPT records are believed to be consistent with the variable geology from superficial deposits of glacial origin.


FINAL

The geology identified in the CPTs is considered to be consistent with the existing report and observations in the trial pits.

BRE Digest 365 Results

Three trial pits were selected by the Engineers for construction of trial soakaways and a compliant filling and monitoring cycle was achieved over three days. The results summary is listed below. SA201 – 2.1 x 10-5 m/s SA202 – 1.2 x 10-6 m/s SA203 – 1.5 x 10-6 m/s All the tests were completed to virtually empty in 24 hours, but two of the three were considered to provide poor discharge of water to land (worse than 5 x 10-6 m/s infiltration). The single test that provided good drainage (SA201) was potentially favourably located in a location with a sand layer which could not be expected to be reliably repeated. If a widespread infiltration rate was to be recommended it would be 1 x 10-6 m/s at design stage which could result in very large traditional soakaways to cope with the worst-case scenario. If the soakaways could be biased to more sandy areas in the construction phase and verification tests undertaken then a design value of 5 x 10-6 m/s may be able to be justified. In practice soakage design rate in the best case may be in the order of 2 x 10-5 m/s but that would be difficult to use in design given results elsewhere. Variable infiltration rates may be mitigated by sustainable design strategies like storage, swales and deep borehole soakaways.

Chemical Analysis for Soil

Samples of soil from widespread across the Site were scheduled for the following analytes: CLEA metals suite, TPH (total), speciated PAH (EPA-16) and asbestos screen. No samples were considered to contain concentrations of contaminants that exceeded relevant screening levels for the proposed development. Samples were assessed conservatively against residential land use. Asbestos fibres were not detected in the samples tested. Topsoil analysis was undertaken to the British Standard for potential use as part of the supply chain and recycling. Re-use of topsoil may be required for the project.

Chemical Analysis for Asphalt

Old asphalt may be made with bitumen or coal tar binder. Coal tar asphalt is generally considered to be hazardous waste as detailed in guidance provided by the EA. Bitumen asphalt may be considered for recycling and re-use in construction. The chemical analysis demonstrated the asphalt was bitumen based.

Chemical Analysis for Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC)

Samples of soil for the supply chain were analysed for the WAC inert part of the guidance. None of the samples tested were found to exceed any of the


FINAL

criteria. Geotechnical Testing

California Bearing Ratio (CBR) was requested by Mott MacDonald but suitable samples were not to be collected from the Site. The ground conditions in the supplementary investigation did not provide encouragement that CBR values would be better than the low values achieved in the existing report which were approximately 1 % only.

Foundation Recommendations

The existing report made a recommendation for traditional foundations at a low allowable bearing pressure of 75kN/m2 at a minimum depth of 0.9 m (and below unsuitable materials such as made ground). This recommendation was based on limited investigation information and took into account other factors. The CPTs have been used to demonstrate that the ground conditions are better than was originally indicated, but still do contain areas of weak geology with soft clay and loose sand. The variable conditions are considered to be typical for the glacial deposits in this area and weak zones are possibly exacerbated by the presence of percolating water at a topographical plateau in generally low permeability soil. Taking into account the data from the CPTs, it is recommended that generally at 0.9 m depth an allowable bearing pressure of 125kN/m2 is applicable in firm to stiff clays and medium dense sand for a traditional form of foundation construction. This recommendation is made on the basis that maximum settlements should not exceed 25 mm which is a typical service limit for property of this type. To limit differential settlements further, an allowable bearing pressure of 100kN/m2 may be considered by the designers. In all cases, should obviously loose/soft zones be encountered, foundation depth should be increased to more competent strata. Alternatively, spanning the zone may be recommended if the soft zone is discovered to be deeper than can be economically trenched. If a continuous formation inspection by the engineer could be afforded, then an allowable bearing pressure recommendation of 200kN/m2 may be adopted in stiff clay geology probably at more than 1.5 m depth. Such a recommendation carries a higher risk of delays during construction. Steel reinforcement of foundations is recommended due to the variable resistance in the penetration tests and what may be long brick walls in the construction. Despite there being only a low risk of dissolution features and no evidence of them discovered in the fieldworks, vigilance is required during groundworks for the presence of significant very loose/soft zones or unusual ground conditions. If encountered, these should be reported for further investigation. A formation of fine sand/silt and clay is sensitive to potential degradation through being exposed to weather and water. Unless foundation concrete is to be poured in good time then the contractor may need to consider the use of blinding concrete. Surface water ingress to foundations should be avoided as it may lead to a significant reduction in bearing capacity.


FINAL

Ground conditions are in general terms considered suitable for ground bearing floor slabs assuming an engineering treatment to the formation of a suitable sub-base. In this case, ground floor slabs are recommended to be suspended, with a naturally ventilated void and damp proof membrane (DPM) provision. Where the loadings or service performance described is insufficient for the purpose of the engineering design of suitable structures, alternative foundations may be required. Should the recommendations made above not be adoptable by the developer for any reason, then the foundation type may need to be an alternative such as ground improvement or piles. Alternative foundation types should be designed in accordance with specialist contractor’s own proprietary systems and further investigation may be required to establish relevant engineering parameters although that seems unlikely given the extent of existing information. Ground improvement by stone columns would not normally be recommended for the soils at this location due to the presence of stiff clay in the CPTs. However, concrete columns and/or pre-auger techniques may be offered by the specialists. The most effective piled foundation system may be the use of driven pre-cast piles combined possibly with pre-cast ground beams to off-set potential programme advantages against extra materials, plant and labour. Continuous flight auger piles are generally acknowledge to be the most economic form of pile based on linear metre, but mobilisation and pile mat costs can skew the overall budget. Small piling rigs may not require an engineer designed pile working platform.

Pavement Design CBR was approximately 1 %. A design CBR of <1% is recommended subject to formation checks in construction. It may be possible to zone CBR following Site strip and an inspection of the formation. CBR is dependent on the condition of the strata and could be different upon excavation to the formation subject to seasonal conditions. Care is required over plant selection and consideration for the use of a geotextile is recommended. If groundworks are unable to progress, particularly in poor weather, then an effective approach may be to adopt soil stabilisation by a specialist.

Contamination Strategy

The supplementary report has concentrated on three aspects of the contamination as follows:

1. Widespread soil contaminants; and 2. Asphalt binder.

Soil inspection in trial pits did not record widespread presence of materials that were of concern such as asbestos or chemical staining. Soil analysis did not identify contaminants above the criteria.


FINAL

The asphalt did not contain coal tar, and the binder was bitumen based. No special precautions are recommended for dealing with the observed soil conditions at the Site. The developer is recommended to be vigilant during groundworks for the occurrence of soil materials different to those identified in the ground investigation. Discovery of other made ground may require further investigation for assessment of contamination and suitability in the development scenario or for recycling and re-use on-Site.

Fresh Water Pipes The local water authority should be contacted at an early stage in order that any abnormal costs can be calculated, if required.

Excavations Trench excavation sides cannot be guaranteed to be stable at this Site, therefore, batters and/or suitable support would be required for excavations. This would also be required where human entry is necessary.

Materials Management

Excavated soils may be suitable for use on-Site or elsewhere subject to suitability for use and any necessary regulator protocols. A materials management plan would help in providing information to the groundworks contractor as to what is expected to be re-cycled in the local supply chain market. Additional testing may be required for optimised off-Site disposal of spoil subject to supply chain demands. It is recommended that the contractor uses a waste management exemption U1 form available from the relevant government web site for re-use of relevant materials in construction up to the various quantity limits.


FINAL

Table 1: Initial Conceptual Site Model & Risk Assessment

Source Pathway Receptor Matrix Assessment Justification

Potentially contaminated soils (from identified on-Site sources

and unrecorded on/off-Site sources)

Geology (Vertical migration through permeable deposits

below the Site) Controlled Waters Low Risk

Limited on-Site sources. Overlies a Secondary A and Principal Aquifer and is within a SPZ.

Low permeability soils and a thick unsaturated zone are present.

Direct contact/ingestion and inhalation of dust/fibres and

volatile vapours, oral via plant uptake

Human Health (including groundworkers)

Low Risk Limited potential sources identified.

Direct contact and leaching Property, Buildings and

Structures Low Risk Limited potential sources identified.

Potential ground gas (from unrecorded on/off-Site

sources) Vertical & lateral migration Human Health, Property Very Low Risk No significant on -Site sources identified.

Standard risk definitions and matrices are presented in Appendix II.


FINAL

4.0 LIMITATIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS

This Report does not constitute a full site investigation, flood risk assessment,

invasive plant assessment, waste classification exercise, contamination, geotechnical

or asbestos survey to fulfil any particular specification except where stated explicitly.

Information was obtained, reviewed and evaluated in preparing this Report from

various external sources. Our conclusions, opinions and recommendations are

based upon this information and the information obtained during the walkover, the

Consultant does not warrant the accuracy of the information provided and will not be

responsible for any opinions expressed, or conclusions reached in reliance upon

information which is subsequently proven to be inaccurate.

The recommendations contained in this Report represent our professional opinions.

These opinions were arrived at in accordance with good practice at this time and

location, and as such are not a guarantee that the Site is free of hazardous or

potentially hazardous materials or conditions.

This Report was prepared for the sole and exclusive use of the Client and for the

specific purpose instructed as defined in Section 1 of this Report. Nothing contained

in this Report shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than

ourselves and the Client, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken are for the

sole and exclusive benefit of the Client and not for the benefit of any other party. In

particular, this Report should not be disseminated to anyone other than the Client or

to be used or relied upon by anyone other than the Client. Use of the Report by any

other person is unauthorised and such use is at the sole risk of the user. Anyone

using or relying upon this Report, other than the Client, agrees by virtue of its use to

indemnify and hold harmless the authors from and against all claims, losses and

damages (of whatsoever nature and howsoever or whensoever arising), arising out

of or resulting from the performance of the work by the Consultant.


FINAL

This Report was prepared by:

_____________________ 03/05/16

Malcolm Tolley Date

Geoenvironmental Engineer

This Report was reviewed by:

______________________ 03/05/16

Tim Wheeler Date

Project Manager

This Report was authorised by:

______________________ 03/05/16

James Harrison Date

Technical Director

Figures

TITLE: PROJECT NO:

FIGURE NO:

SCALE:

REVISION:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

Not to Scale

1

03 May 2016

15-1091.02

1

SD

JH

Borehole Location Plan

Wherry School

Norwich

TITLE: PROJECT NO:

FIGURE NO:

SCALE:

REVISION:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

Not to Scale

1

03 May 2016

15-1091.02

2

SD

JH


Wherry School

Norwich

TITLE: PROJECT NO:

FIGURE NO:

SCALE:

REVISION:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

Not to Scale

1

03 May 2016

15-1091.02

2A

SD

JH


Wherry School

Norwich

TITLE: PROJECT NO:

FIGURE NO:

SCALE:

REVISION:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

Not to Scale

1

03 May 2016

15-1091.02

2B

SD

JH


Wherry School

Norwich

TITLE: PROJECT NO:

FIGURE NO:

SCALE:

REVISION:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

Not to Scale

1

03 May 2016

15-1091.02

2C

SD

JH


Wherry School

Norwich

TITLE: PROJECT NO:

FIGURE NO:

SCALE:

REVISION:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

Not to Scale

1

03 May 2016

15-1091.02

2D

SD

JH


Wherry School

Norwich

TITLE: PROJECT NO:

FIGURE NO:

SCALE:

REVISION:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

Not to Scale

1

03 May 2016

15-1091.02

2E

SD

JH


Wherry School

Norwich

Appendix I

Geo

-en

vir

on

me

nta

l R

ep

ort

Ge

ote

ch

nic

al

Ca

teg

ory

1

Pro

po

sed

Ne

w D

ev

elo

pm

en

t H

ew

ett

Sc

ho

ol,

N

orw

ich

Fo

r M

ac

e G

rou

p

Delt

a S

imo

ns P

roje

ct

No

. 15-1

091.0

1

Issu

ed

: F

eb

rua

ry 2

01

6

FIN

AL

TA

BL

E O

F C

ON

TE

NT

S

1.0

IN

TR

OD

UC

TIO

N ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

. 1

1.1

A

utho

risa

tion

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

.. 1

1

.2

Con

text

& P

urpo

se ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

... 1

1

.3

Sco

pe ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

... 2

2

.0

INV

ES

TIG

AT

ION

ME

TH

OD

OLO

GY

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

.. 4

2

.1

Des

k S

tudy

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

. 4

2.2

C

once

ptu

al S

ite M

odel

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

... 4

2.

3

Pla

nnin

g, S

ettin

g O

ut &

Ser

vice

s, P

rese

ntat

ion

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

.. 5

2.

4

Dyn

amic

Sam

pler

Bor

eh

ole

s ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

6

2.5

S

tand

pipe

In

sta

llatio

ns ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

. 7

2.6

D

ynam

ic P

enet

ratio

n T

est

s ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

.. 7

2.

7

Sta

ndar

d P

enet

ratio

n T

est

s ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

.. 7

2

.8

Bor

ehol

e F

alli

ng H

ead

Te

st ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

.. 7

2.

9

Mon

itorin

g G

roun

dwat

er

& G

roun

d G

as

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

. 7

2.1

0

Che

mic

al A

naly

sis

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

8

2.1

1 G

eot

ech

nica

l Te

stin

g ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

.. 8

2.

12

Scr

eeni

ng A

sses

sme

nt C

riter

ia ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

.. 8

3

.0

RE

SU

LT

S &

INT

ER

PR

ET

AT

ION

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

. 10

3.1

D

esk

Stu

dy ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

. 10

3.2

F

ield

wor

ks I

nter

pre

tatio

n ..

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

12

4.0

LI

MIT

AT

ION

S T

O E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L A

SS

ES

SM

EN

TS

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

....

. 18

T

ab

les

T

able

1

Initi

al C

once

ptua

l Site

Mod

el &

Ris

k A

sses

smen

t

F

igu

res

F

igur

e 1

S

ite L

ocat

ion

Pla

n F

igur

e 2

R

elev

ant

Fea

ture

s P

lan

Fig

ure

3

App

roxi

mat

e Lo

catio

ns o

f B

oreh

ole

s an

d P

enet

ratio

n T

estin

g

Ap

pen

dic

es

A

ppen

dix

I

Ris

k D

efin

ition

s A

ppen

dix

II

Key

to

Log

s, F

ield

Rec

ords

& C

ompl

ianc

e C

ertif

icat

es

App

endi

x II

I M

onito

ring

Rec

ords

A

ppen

dix

IV

C

hem

ical

Ana

lysi

s A

ppen

dix

V

G

eote

chni

cal T

estin

g

App

endi

x V

I G

ener

ic A

sses

smen

t Crit

eria

FIN

AL

GE

OE

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L R

EP

OR

T

GE

OT

EC

HN

ICA

L C

AT

EG

OR

Y 1

PR

OP

OS

ED

NE

W D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

HE

WE

TT

SC

HO

OL

, N

OR

WIC

H

FO

R M

AC

E G

RO

UP

DE

LT

A-S

IMO

NS

PR

OJE

CT

NO

. 15-1

091.0

1

1.0

IN

TR

OD

UC

TIO

N

1.1

A

uth

ori

sati

on

Del

ta-S

imon

s E

nviro

nmen

tal

Con

sulta

nts

Lim

ited

(D

elta

-Sim

ons

) w

as i

nstr

ucte

d by

Mac

e G

roup

(th

e C

lient

/Eng

inee

r) t

o ca

rry

out

a si

te i

nve

stig

atio

n at

the

He

wet

t

Sch

ool,

Nor

wic

h (h

erea

fter

refe

rred

to a

s th

e “S

ite”)

, pr

ior

to d

evel

opm

ent

if a

new

sch

ool b

uild

ing

. T

he

loca

tion

of t

his

Site

is s

how

n on

Fig

ure

1.

1.2

C

on

text

& P

urp

ose

The

re i

s an

exi

stin

g t

hird

par

ty r

epor

t (E

PS

, G

eo-E

nviro

nme

nta

l D

esk

Stu

dy R

epor

t

ref.

: U

K15

.206

0,

date

d D

ecem

ber

2

015)

an

d U

XO

re

port

(M

AC

C

Inte

rnat

iona

l

Lim

ited,

Pro

ject

Num

ber

4172

) fo

r th

e S

ite,

whi

ch s

houl

d be

rea

d in

con

junc

tion

with

this

Rep

ort.

A b

rief

revi

ew o

f th

e E

PS

rep

ort h

as b

een

incl

uded

in s

ectio

n 3.

1.

At

the

time

of t

he w

ork,

the

lan

d co

ncer

ned

had

not

been

ide

ntifi

ed a

s re

qui

ring

deta

iled

inve

stig

atio

n fo

r th

e pu

rpos

es

of

plan

ning

as

soci

ated

w

ith

eith

er

cont

amin

ated

or

unst

able

land

.

Thi

s R

epor

t ha

s be

en u

nder

take

n g

ener

ally

in

acc

orda

nce

with

Brit

ish

Sta

ndar

d B

S

5930

:199

9+A

2:20

10 C

ode

of p

ract

ice

for

site

inv

estig

atio

ns,

and

is

inte

nded

as

a

Geo

tech

nica

l C

ateg

ory

1 re

port

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

Brit

ish

Sta

ndar

d B

SE

N19

97-

1:20

04 E

uroc

ode

7: G

eote

chni

cal

Des

ign

– P

art

1: G

ener

al r

ules

, or

as

part

of

a

prel

imin

ary

inve

stig

atio

n in

a G

eote

chni

cal C

ateg

ory

2 si

tuat

ion.

The

pur

pose

of

this

inv

est

igat

ion

was

to

unde

rtak

e an

ini

tial

limite

d ap

prai

sal

of t

he

geo

-env

ironm

enta

l gr

ound

con

ditio

ns a

nd o

btai

n da

ta o

n ch

emic

al a

nd g

eote

chni

cal

para

met

ers

at

the

Site

fo

r us

e by

th

e C

lient

co

nsid

erin

g

pote

ntia

l de

velo

pmen

t

plan

ning

, de

sig

n an

d en

gin

eerin

g fo

r co

nstr

uctio

n.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew D

eve

lopm

ent a

t H

ewet

t S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Nu

mb

er

15

-10

91.0

1

Pa

ge

2

FIN

AL

Thi

s R

epor

t ha

s be

en b

ased

on

a br

ief

desk

stu

dy r

evie

w t

oget

her

with

fie

ldw

orks

com

pris

ing

soi

l sa

mpl

ing

and

in-

situ

geo

tech

nica

l te

stin

g.

Sel

ecte

d so

il sa

mpl

es

wer

e sc

hedu

led

for

labo

rato

ry c

hem

ical

ana

lysi

s an

d ge

otec

hnic

al t

estin

g. M

onito

ring

was

car

ried

out

on

the

Site

for

wat

er le

vels

and

con

cent

ratio

ns o

f ha

zard

ous

grou

nd

gas

.

The

res

ults

of

the

sam

plin

g w

ith t

he r

elev

ant

labo

rato

ry w

ork

have

bee

n pr

esen

ted

in

the

App

endi

ces.

The

met

hods

of t

he f

ield

wor

ks h

ave

been

des

crib

ed in

Sec

tion

2.

The

inte

rpre

tatio

n of

the

res

ults

has

bee

n pr

esen

ted

as a

tab

le in

Sec

tion

3 w

ith d

esk

stud

y, a

con

cept

ual

site

mod

el (

CS

M)

and

initi

al r

isk

asse

ssm

ent

base

d on

the

sour

ce-p

athw

ay-r

ecep

tor

prin

cipl

e an

d re

com

men

datio

ns

for

aspe

cts

of

plan

ning

desi

gn

and

cons

truc

tion.

Fou

ndat

ion

desi

gn

may

be

unde

rtak

en b

y en

gin

eers

usi

ng m

etho

ds a

s de

scrib

ed

in

Bui

ldin

g R

egul

atio

ns/S

tand

ards

, N

atio

nal H

ouse

Bui

ldin

g C

ounc

il (N

HB

C)

Sta

ndar

ds,

Bui

ldin

g R

esea

rch

Est

ablis

hmen

t (B

RE

) g

uida

nce

or i

f ap

prop

riate

Brit

ish

Sta

ndar

d

BS

810

3-1:

1995

Str

uctu

ral d

esig

n of

low

-ris

e bu

ildin

gs

— P

art

1: C

ode

of p

ract

ice

for

stab

ility

, si

te i

nves

tigat

ion,

fou

ndat

ions

and

gro

und

floor

sla

bs f

or h

ousi

ng.

Del

ta-

Sim

ons

has

also

pr

ovid

ed

furt

her

reco

mm

enda

tions

w

ith

resp

ect

to

the

grou

nd

cond

ition

s fo

r th

e as

sist

ance

of

the

eng

inee

r as

des

igne

r ba

sed

on l

ocal

kno

wle

dge

and

expe

rienc

e of

pas

t pro

ject

s in

the

reg

ion.

1.3

S

co

pe

The

sco

pe o

f w

orks

per

form

ed f

or t

his

Rep

ort

has

been

des

igne

d in

con

junc

tion

with

the

Clie

nt/E

ngin

eer

and

com

pris

ed t

he f

ollo

win

g:

R

evie

w o

f th

ird-p

arty

des

k st

udy;

S

oil s

ampl

ing

;

In

-situ

pen

etra

tion

test

ing;

In

-situ

per

mea

bilit

y te

stin

g;

La

bora

tory

tes

ting;

G

roun

d ga

s m

onito

ring;

C

onta

min

atio

n as

sess

men

t; an

d

G

eote

chni

cal a

sses

smen

t.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew

Dev

elo

pmen

t at H

ewe

tt S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Num

ber

15-1

091.

01

P

age

3

FIN

AL

Acc

ordi

ng t

o B

SE

N 1

997

-1,

Geo

tech

nica

l C

ateg

ory

1 (G

C1)

sho

uld

only

inc

lude

smal

l an

d re

lativ

ely

sim

ple

stru

ctur

es f

or w

hich

it

is p

ossi

ble

to

ensu

re t

hat

the

fund

amen

tal r

equi

rem

ents

will

be

sat

isfie

d on

the

bas

is o

f ex

perie

nce

and

qua

litat

ive

geo

tech

nica

l in

vest

igat

ions

; -

with

ne

glig

ible

ris

k.

The

de

sig

ner/

eng

inee

r is

resp

onsi

ble

for

chec

king

th

e C

lient

’s

requ

irem

ents

fo

r co

mpl

ianc

e w

ith

the

Eur

ocod

es, a

nd G

C1.

Thi

s R

epor

t m

ay e

xcee

d th

e m

inim

um s

tand

ards

by

incl

usio

n of

som

e q

uant

itativ

e

data

to s

uppo

rt lo

cal k

now

ledg

e an

d ex

perie

nce

in m

akin

g re

com

men

datio

ns.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew D

eve

lopm

ent a

t H

ewet

t S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Nu

mb

er

15

-10

91.0

1

Pa

ge

4

FIN

AL

2.0

IN

VE

ST

IGA

TIO

N M

ET

HO

DO

LO

GY

2.1

D

esk S

tud

y

Gui

danc

e on

des

k st

udy

prac

tice

and

inte

rpre

tatio

n fo

r co

ntam

inat

ed la

nd is

pro

vide

d

in B

ritis

h S

tand

ard

BS

1017

5:20

11 C

ode

of p

ract

ice

for

inve

stig

atio

n of

pot

entia

lly

cont

amin

ated

si

tes,

an

d th

e E

nviro

nmen

t A

genc

y pu

blic

atio

n C

LR11

“M

odel

Pro

cedu

res

for

the

ma

nag

eme

nt o

f lan

d co

ntam

inat

ion”

, pl

us a

ssoc

iate

d do

cum

ents

incl

udin

g D

epar

tmen

t of

the

Env

ironm

ent

Indu

stry

Pro

files

. A

s th

e S

ite h

as n

ot b

een

iden

tifie

d as

pot

entia

lly c

onta

min

ated

, th

e fu

ll ris

k as

sess

men

t pr

oces

s m

ay n

ot h

ave

been

und

erta

ken

at th

is s

tag

e.

Des

k st

udy

prac

tice

for

geo

tech

nica

l as

pect

s is

des

crib

ed i

n B

S59

30:1

999+

A2:

2010

and

to

a lim

ited

exte

nt

in

Brit

ish

Sta

ndar

d B

SE

N19

97-2

:200

4 E

uroc

ode

7:

Geo

tech

nica

l D

esig

n –

Par

t 2:

Gro

und

inve

stig

atio

n an

d te

stin

g.

As

part

of

a lim

ited

inve

stig

atio

n,

the

full

req

uire

men

ts

of

a g

eote

chni

cal

desk

st

udy

may

no

t be

com

plet

ed.

The

des

k st

udy

repo

rt i

s in

tend

ed t

o co

mp

ly w

ith N

atio

nal

Hou

se-B

uild

ing

Cou

ncil

(NH

BC

) S

tand

ards

Cha

pter

4.1

'La

nd q

ualit

y -

man

agin

g g

roun

d co

nditi

ons'

, an

d

min

imum

req

uire

men

ts fo

r lo

cal p

lann

ing

auth

oriti

es (

LPA

s) fo

r lo

w r

isk

proj

ects

.

Bas

ic r

isk

asse

ssm

ent

in g

eote

chni

cs a

nd c

onta

min

atio

n is

pro

vide

d by

the

thi

rd

part

y re

port

.

A

wal

kove

r ha

s be

en

cond

ucte

d by

an

e

xper

ienc

ed

scie

ntis

t or

eng

inee

r to

a s

tand

ard

met

hodo

log

y an

d w

here

app

ropr

iate

rel

evan

t fe

atur

es h

ave

been

mar

ked

on F

igur

e 2.

2.2

C

on

cep

tual S

ite M

od

el

A c

once

ptua

l ex

posu

re m

odel

rep

rese

nts

the

rela

tions

hips

bet

wee

n co

ntam

inan

t

sour

ces,

pat

hway

s an

d re

cept

ors,

to

supp

ort

the

iden

tific

atio

n an

d as

sess

men

t of

poss

ible

pol

luta

nt l

inka

ges

(PP

L) -

and

an

asse

ssm

ent

of k

now

n po

lluta

nt l

inka

ges

,

whe

re id

entif

ied

from

exi

stin

g in

form

atio

n.

Whe

re P

PLs

are

iden

tifie

d, a

pre

limin

ary

risk

asse

ssm

ent

is c

arrie

d ou

t to

ass

ess

the

likel

ihoo

d th

at

each

po

ssib

le

linka

ge

exis

ts

and

to

de

cide

w

heth

er

thes

e po

se

pote

ntia

lly u

nacc

epta

ble

risks

to

iden

tifie

d re

cept

ors

and

req

uire

fur

ther

ass

essm

ent.

Whe

re t

his

linka

ge

is o

f a

form

tha

t su

bseq

uent

ly l

eads

to

land

bei

ng i

dent

ified

as

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew

Dev

elo

pmen

t at H

ewe

tt S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Num

ber

15-1

091.

01

P

age

5

FIN

AL

‘con

tam

inat

ed la

nd’ u

nder

the

term

s of

Par

t 2A

of th

e E

nviro

nmen

tal

Pro

tect

ion

Act

1990

, the

link

age

is t

erm

ed a

sig

nific

ant p

ollu

tant

link

age

.

At

the

prel

imin

ary

risk

asse

ssm

ent

stag

e, w

hich

is

usua

lly b

ased

upo

n de

sk t

op

info

rmat

ion,

the

dec

isio

n on

whe

ther

a P

PL

pose

s a

pote

ntia

lly u

nacc

epta

ble

risk

is

base

d up

on

prof

essi

onal

ju

dgem

ent.

T

he

sign

ifica

nce

of

the

PP

L w

ill

als

o be

dete

rmin

ed

depe

ndan

t on

th

e co

ntex

t of

th

e la

nd

use

and

the

purp

ose

of

the

asse

ssm

ent.

Ass

essi

ng r

isks

fro

m la

nd c

onta

min

atio

n un

derp

ins

the

“sui

tabl

e fo

r us

e” a

ppro

ach

adop

ted

for

Par

t 2A

of

the

Env

ironm

enta

l Pro

tect

ion

Act

199

0 re

gul

ator

y re

gim

e an

d

the

Nat

iona

l Pla

nnin

g P

olic

y F

ram

ewor

k (N

PP

F),

Mar

ch 2

012.

Bas

ed

on

the

info

rmat

ion

obta

ined

fr

om

this

as

sess

men

t, a

prel

imin

ary

risk

asse

ssm

ent

usin

g

the

sour

ce-p

athw

ay-r

ecep

tor

appr

oach

ha

s be

en

form

ulat

ed,

wh

ich

iden

tifie

s P

PLs

at t

he S

ite in

the

cont

ext

of th

e pr

opos

ed e

nd-u

se.

A C

SM

and

pre

limin

ary

risk

asse

ssm

ent

is p

rese

nted

at

the

end

of S

ectio

n 3

and

it

take

s in

to

acco

unt

the

rele

vant

fin

ding

s of

th

e fie

ld

and

labo

rato

ry

out

com

es.

App

endi

x I

cont

ains

ris

k de

finiti

ons.

2.3

P

lan

nin

g,

Se

ttin

g O

ut

& S

erv

ice

s, P

res

en

tati

on

Unl

ess

othe

rwis

e st

ated

, th

e in

vest

igat

ion

has

been

pla

nned

on

a sc

ope

of w

orks

agre

ed w

ith t

he C

lient

whi

ch i

s ty

pica

lly b

ased

on

mul

tiple

s of

one

day

on

-Site

with

vario

us

drill

ing

an

d sa

mpl

ing

eq

uipm

ent,

or

a

mea

sure

d am

ount

of

dr

illin

g

and

test

ing

.

Clie

nts

are

req

uest

ed t

o pr

ovid

e al

l ser

vice

pla

ns in

orig

inal

for

m f

rom

sup

plie

rs s

o a

serv

ices

ris

k as

sess

men

t ca

n be

und

erta

ken

as p

art

of a

for

mal

Site

-spe

cific

Hea

lth

and

Saf

ety

Pla

n. T

he s

ervi

ces

risk

asse

ssm

ent

is b

ased

on

gui

danc

e pr

ovid

ed i

n

HS

G47

Avo

idin

g d

ang

er fr

om u

nder

gro

und

serv

ices

.

Exp

lora

tory

hol

e an

d su

bseq

uent

sam

ple

loca

tions

wer

e se

lect

ed t

o pr

ovid

e su

itabl

e

cove

rag

e of

the

Site

, ha

ving

reg

ard

for

the

likel

y pr

esen

ce o

f se

rvic

es a

nd

any

othe

r

Site

-spe

cific

con

stra

ints

suc

h as

exi

stin

g s

truc

ture

s an

d fin

ishe

s. W

here

app

licab

le,

susp

ecte

d em

issi

ons

loca

tions

, or

geo

log

y va

riatio

ns m

ay h

ave

been

targ

eted

.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew D

eve

lopm

ent a

t H

ewet

t S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Nu

mb

er

15

-10

91.0

1

Pa

ge

6

FIN

AL

Prio

r to

any

exc

ava

tion,

spe

cial

ist

utili

ties

and

une

xplo

ded

ord

nanc

e cl

ear

ance

was

com

plet

ed a

t th

e lo

catio

ns o

f th

e in

trus

ive

hole

s.

In a

dditi

on,

a ca

ble

dete

ctor

was

used

at

sam

plin

g p

ositi

ons

to a

void

ele

ctri

c ca

bles

and

han

d to

ols

we

re u

sed

as

thou

gh

serv

ices

wer

e lo

cate

d cl

ose

by.

The

loc

atio

ns o

f th

e in

vest

igat

ions

are

sho

wn

on F

igur

e 3

and

the

field

rec

ords

are

prov

ided

in A

ppen

dix

II.

2.4

D

yn

am

ic S

am

ple

r B

ore

ho

les

Dyn

amic

sam

pler

bor

ehol

e sy

stem

s ar

e no

t ex

plic

itly

desc

ribed

in

Eur

ocod

es,

or i

n

the

rele

vant

Brit

ish

Sta

ndar

d B

SE

NIS

O 2

2475

-1:2

006

Geo

tech

nica

l inv

estig

atio

n an

d

test

ing

– S

ampl

ing

met

hods

and

gro

undw

ater

mea

sure

men

ts –

Par

t 1:

Tec

hnic

al

prin

cipl

es f

or e

xecu

tion.

The

dyn

amic

sam

pler

sys

tem

com

pris

es a

ser

ies

of v

aryi

ng d

iam

eter

met

al t

ubes

of

1 m

or

2 m

len

gth,

wh

ich

allo

ws

a lin

er t

o be

ins

erte

d. T

he t

ubes

are

driv

en i

nto

the

gro

und

usin

g a

per

cuss

ive

wei

ght

fal

ling

thro

ugh

a st

anda

rd d

rop

onto

an

anvi

l

atta

ched

to

solid

rod

s, a

nd w

ithdr

awn

by

use

of a

hyd

raul

ic ja

ck.

The

soi

l is

push

ed

into

the

tub

e/lin

er d

urin

g t

he d

rivin

g,

and

sam

ples

are

rec

over

ed fr

om th

e tu

be o

nce

it

has

been

spl

it fo

r de

scrip

tion

. A

ltern

ativ

ely,

lin

ers

are

omitt

ed a

nd t

he m

etal

tub

es

have

slo

ts o

r w

indo

ws

cut

into

the

sid

es w

here

sam

ples

can

be

take

n di

rect

ly b

y

hand

.

The

line

r m

etho

d po

tent

ially

off

ers

a lo

wer

deg

ree

of s

ampl

e di

stur

banc

e.

The

sys

tem

can

ach

ieve

typ

ical

dep

ths

of a

roun

d 3

m t

o 5

m i

n fa

vour

able

soi

l

cond

ition

s.

The

sys

tem

is li

mite

d by

coa

rse

gra

vel o

r ot

her

larg

e fr

agm

ents

, an

d al

so

in w

et s

ands

whe

re t

he h

ole

colla

pse

s. S

ome

casi

ng s

yste

ms

exis

t.

The

det

ails

of

the

gro

und

cond

ition

s en

coun

tere

d ar

e pr

esen

ted

on t

he r

elev

ant

field

reco

rd s

heet

s, w

hich

als

o de

tail

the

type

and

dep

ths

of s

ampl

es t

aken

and

the

res

ults

of a

ny i

n-s

itu t

ests

. O

ther

rel

evan

t in

form

atio

n m

ay a

lso

be r

ecor

ded

incl

udin

g

gro

undw

ater

leve

ls a

nd d

etai

ls o

f any

sta

ndpi

pe in

stal

latio

ns.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew

Dev

elo

pmen

t at H

ewe

tt S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Num

ber

15-1

091.

01

P

age

7

FIN

AL

2.5

S

tan

dp

ipe I

nsta

lla

tio

ns

Thr

ee o

f th

e dy

nam

ic s

ampl

er b

oreh

oles

hav

e be

en f

itted

with

a g

as/

wat

er

mo

nito

ring

stan

dpip

e of

50

mm

inte

rnal

dia

met

er U

PV

C s

lotte

d an

d pl

ain

casi

ng t

o th

e re

qui

red

dept

h as

app

ropr

iate

, ca

pped

by

a g

as t

ap b

ung

and

cove

r g

ener

ally

in

acco

rdan

ce

with

BS

EN

ISO

224

75-1

:200

6 fo

r an

ope

n st

andp

ipe

. T

he lo

catio

ns

of t

he m

onito

ring

inst

alla

tions

are

sho

wn

on F

igur

e 3.

2.6

D

yn

am

ic P

en

etr

ati

on

Te

sts

Dyn

amic

pen

etra

tion

test

ing

is

unde

rtak

en g

ener

ally

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith B

S E

N I

SO

2247

6-2:

2005

+A

1:20

11 G

eote

chni

cal i

nves

tigat

ion

and

test

ing.

Fie

ld t

estin

g D

ynam

ic

prob

ing.

2.7

S

tan

dard

Pen

etr

ati

on

Tests

Sta

ndar

d pe

netr

atio

n te

stin

g i

s un

dert

aken

gen

eral

ly i

n ac

cord

ance

with

BS

EN

IS

O

2247

6-3:

2005

+A

1:20

11

Geo

tech

nica

l in

vest

igat

ion

and

test

ing

. F

ield

te

stin

g

Sta

ndar

d pe

netr

atio

n te

st.

2.8

B

ore

ho

le F

allin

g H

ead

Test

A

bore

hole

fa

lling

he

ad

test

in

volv

es

fillin

g

a sh

allo

w

dept

h dy

nam

ic

sam

pler

bore

hole

with

wat

er.

The

dep

th t

o th

e w

ater

lev

el i

n th

e ho

le i

s re

cord

ed u

sing

an

elec

tron

ic d

ip m

eter

at

reg

ular

int

erva

ls u

ntil

the

wat

er h

as d

issi

pate

d, o

r ov

er a

suita

ble

perio

d of

ty

pica

lly

60

min

utes

.

The

re

sults

ar

e us

ed

to

dete

rmin

e an

appr

oxim

ate

soil

perm

eabi

lity

in

acco

rdan

ce

with

a

met

hod

deriv

ed

from

BS

5930

:199

9+A

2:20

10.

Thi

s m

etho

d of

tes

ting

sho

uld

only

be

cons

ider

ed

to g

ive

an

indi

catio

n of

th

e po

tent

ial

suita

bilit

y of

us

ing

co

nven

tiona

l so

akaw

ays

and

may

req

uire

co

nfirm

atio

n of

des

ign

par

amet

ers

thro

ugh

othe

r te

chni

ques

.

2.9

M

on

ito

rin

g G

rou

nd

wa

ter

& G

rou

nd

Ga

s

Gro

undw

ater

mon

itorin

g is

un

dert

aken

usi

ng a

n el

ectr

onic

dip

met

er,

whi

ch r

ecor

ds

the

dept

h to

wat

er in

a s

tand

pipe

.

Gro

und

gas

com

posi

tion

and

flow

mon

itorin

g i

s un

dert

aken

whe

re s

tand

pipe

s ha

ve

been

ins

talle

d.

Bot

h flo

w (

litre

s pe

r ho

ur)

and

com

posi

tion

(%)

are

mea

sure

d us

ing

an in

fra-

red

gas

mon

itor,

cal

ibra

ted

for

met

hane

, ca

rbon

dio

xide

& o

xyg

en.

Rec

ords

are

also

tak

en o

f at

mos

pher

ic p

ress

ure.

The

mon

itorin

g f

ield

rec

ords

are

pre

sent

ed in

App

endi

x II

I.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew D

eve

lopm

ent a

t H

ewet

t S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Nu

mb

er

15

-10

91.0

1

Pa

ge

8

FIN

AL

2.1

0 C

hem

ical

An

aly

sis

The

res

ults

of t

he c

hem

ical

ana

lysi

s ar

e pr

esen

ted

in A

ppen

dix

IV.

2.1

1 G

eo

tech

nic

al T

esti

ng

The

res

ults

of t

he g

eote

chni

cal t

estin

g a

re p

rese

nted

in A

ppen

dix

V.

2.1

2 S

cre

en

ing

Asses

sm

en

t C

rite

ria

In t

he a

bsen

ce o

f a

com

plet

e re

gul

ator

y se

t of

scr

eeni

ng v

alue

s de

rived

usi

ng t

he

Con

tam

inat

ed L

and

Exp

osur

e A

sses

smen

t (C

LEA

) F

ram

ewor

k, D

elta

-Sim

ons

will

refe

r to

the

follo

win

g:

T

he S

oil G

uida

nce

Val

ues

(SG

Vs)

pub

lishe

d by

the

Env

ironm

ent

Ag

ency

;

C

ateg

ory

4 S

cree

ning

Lev

els

(C4S

Ls)

publ

ishe

d by

Def

ra;

S

uita

ble

for

Use

Le

vels

fo

r H

uman

H

ealth

R

isk

Ass

essm

ent

(S4U

Ls)

publ

ishe

d by

La

nd

Qua

lity

Man

agem

en

t (L

QM

)/C

hart

ere

d In

stitu

te

of

Env

ironm

ent

al H

ealth

(C

IEH

);

T

he g

uida

nce

valu

es p

rodu

ced

by t

he E

nvi

ronm

enta

l In

dust

ries

Com

mis

sion

(EIC

),

the

Ass

ocia

tion

of

Geo

tech

nica

l an

d G

eoen

viro

nmen

tal

Spe

cial

ists

(AG

S)

and

Con

tam

inat

ed L

and:

App

licat

ion

in R

eal

Env

ironm

ents

(C

L:A

IRE

)

in D

ecem

ber

2009

; and

In

hou

se G

ener

ic S

cree

ning

Val

ues

(HH

-GS

Vs)

der

ived

by

De

lta-S

imon

s an

d

othe

r no

n U

K v

alue

s w

here

con

side

red

rele

vant

.

Del

ta-S

imon

s ad

opte

d H

uman

Hea

lth G

ener

ic A

sses

smen

t C

riter

ia f

or a

com

mer

cial

end-

use

are

pres

ente

d in

App

endi

x V

I.

The

Del

ta-S

imon

s m

etho

dolo

gy

for

soil

scre

enin

g a

sses

smen

t co

mpr

ises

co

mpa

rison

of l

imite

d ch

emic

al a

naly

sis

resu

lts w

ith t

he

crite

ria f

or t

he m

ost

sens

itive

pla

usib

le

end-

use

scen

ario

in th

e pr

opos

ed s

chem

e.

Exc

eeda

nce

of c

riter

ia in

dica

tes

that

ris

k ab

ove

“min

imal

” le

vel m

ay e

xist

in a

wor

st-

case

sce

nario

acr

oss

the

who

le s

ite.

The

pre

caut

iona

ry p

rinci

ple

is a

pplie

d w

ith

resp

ect

to

prot

ectio

n of

hu

man

he

alth

re

com

men

ding

; fu

rthe

r ris

k as

sess

men

t

(incr

ease

d ch

arac

teris

atio

n in

clud

ing

ext

ents

/zon

es),

or

site

-wid

e re

med

iatio

n.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew

Dev

elo

pmen

t at H

ewe

tt S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Num

ber

15-1

091.

01

P

age

9

FIN

AL

Crit

eria

suc

h as

C4S

Ls m

ay b

e us

ed t

o de

scrib

e si

tes

with

a “

low

” le

vel o

f ris

k th

at

coul

d be

con

side

red

acce

ptab

le i

n a

spec

ific

deve

lopm

ent

scen

ario

fol

low

ing

fur

ther

asse

ssm

ent.

Rem

edia

tion

is

likel

y to

be

re

com

men

ded

whe

re

C4S

L cr

iteria

is

exce

eded

.

If n

o cr

iteri

a ex

ceed

ance

is

obse

rved

, th

e R

epor

t m

ay s

till

reco

mm

end

furt

her

risk

asse

ssm

ent,

or r

emed

iatio

n du

e to

unc

erta

inty

ove

r fu

ll ch

arac

teris

atio

n of

the

Site

.

Pos

t-re

port

ac

tion

shou

ld

be

Site

-spe

cific

and

bas

ed o

n a

Clie

nt’s

res

ourc

e/ris

k

prof

ile in

und

erta

king

dev

elop

men

ts in

acc

orda

nce

with

any

reg

ulat

or r

equi

rem

ents

.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew D

eve

lopm

ent a

t H

ewet

t S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Nu

mb

er

15

-10

91.0

1

Pa

ge

10

FIN

AL

3.0

R

ES

UL

TS

& I

NT

ER

PR

ET

AT

ION

3.1

D

esk S

tud

y

Sit

e D

esc

rip

tio

n &

W

alk

ov

er

(Rec

onna

issa

nce,

In

tern

et A

ir P

hoto

gra

phy)

The

Site

com

pris

ed a

n irr

egu

lar

shap

ed p

arce

l of

la

nd m

easu

ring

appr

oxim

atel

y 85

m b

y 14

7 m

(at

its

gre

ates

t ex

tent

s) l

ocat

ed o

n

the

He

wet

t S

cho

ol S

ite,

off

Cec

il R

oad,

Nor

wic

h;

appr

oxim

ate

ly 1

.9

km s

outh

of

the

cent

re o

f N

orw

ich,

Nor

folk

. A

w

alko

ver

was

un

dert

aken

on

6th

Ja

nuar

y 20

16.

The

re

leva

nt

feat

ures

ide

ntifi

ed

duri

ng t

he w

alk

over

are

sho

wn

in F

igur

e 2

and

are

desc

ribed

bel

ow

. T

he

Site

co

mpr

ised

a

gras

s la

ndsc

aped

sc

hoo

l fie

ld,

with

an

ex

istin

g p

layi

ng

cour

t w

ith a

spha

lt su

rfac

ing.

T

he S

ite

was

bou

nde

d b

y a

met

al s

ecur

ity f

ence

to

the

sou

th,

hedg

ero

w t

o th

e e

ast

and

mat

ure

and

sem

i m

atur

e tr

ees

to t

he

wes

t. T

he n

orth

of

the

Site

was

ope

n to

the

sur

rou

ndin

g sc

hool

bu

ildin

gs.

The

adj

acen

t sc

hoo

l b

uild

ings

wer

e lo

w r

ise,

and

of

a m

ixtu

re o

f br

ick

and

woo

den

clad

ding

con

stru

ctio

n.

The

re w

ere

no b

uild

ings

on

-Site

. T

he S

ite w

as g

ener

ally

fla

t in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

surr

ound

ing

are

a.

Bel

ow

gro

und

serv

ices

are

kno

wn

to c

ross

the

Site

.

The

sur

roun

ding

are

a co

mpr

ised

sch

ool

bu

ildin

gs a

nd

field

to

th

e

nort

h a

nd

wes

t, fo

otba

ll pi

tche

s to

th

e so

uth

, a

nd

resi

den

tial

prop

ertie

s to

the

eas

t.

No

evid

enc

e w

as

obs

erve

d of

po

tent

ial

cont

amin

atio

n fr

om

fuel

ta

nks,

ha

zard

ous

mat

eria

l sto

res,

soi

l sto

ckpi

les

or in

vasi

ve p

lant

s.

Onl

ine

aer

ial

imag

ery

sho

ws

the

Site

as

unch

ang

ed

fro

m 1

999

to

the

pres

ent

da

y.

Ma

p G

eo

log

y &

C

om

me

nta

ry (

Brit

ish

G

eolo

gica

l Sur

vey

(BG

S)

1:50

,000

S

cale

Ma

ppin

g)

The

BG

S m

appi

ng s

ho

ws

the

Site

is s

ituat

ed o

n su

per

ficia

l dep

osits

of

the

Low

esto

ft F

orm

atio

n (D

iam

icto

n).

The

und

erly

ing

bedr

ock

geol

og

y is

Cra

g G

rou

p (S

and

and

Gra

vel)

to

the

wes

t, w

ith b

edr

ock

of C

halk

pos

sibl

y to

the

eas

t.

Leet

Hill

Sa

nd a

nd G

rave

l Mem

ber

are

sho

wn

off-

Site

to th

e n

orth

. H

isto

rica

l sm

all-

scal

e m

iner

al e

xtra

ctio

n ha

s b

een

reco

rded

off

-Site

T

here

is

no e

vid

ence

in

the

map

ping

res

earc

hed

th

at t

he S

ite h

as

been

aff

ecte

d.

The

geo

log

y is

sus

cept

ible

to

the

form

atio

n of

dis

solu

tion

feat

ure

s w

hich

ma

y ha

ve a

n i

ncre

ased

fre

que

ncy

at g

eol

og

y ch

ang

es f

or

inst

ance

fro

m c

lay

to g

ran

ular

mat

eria

ls.

U

ne

xp

lod

ed

O

rdn

an

ce

(U

XO

) (N

orfo

lk

Cou

nty

C

ounc

il W

WII

Bom

b M

ap)

Wor

ld W

ar I

I b

omb

strik

es w

ere

reco

rded

off

-Site

in t

he

surr

ound

ing

ar

ea to

the

sou

th-e

ast.

M

AC

C i

nter

natio

nal

cate

go

rise

the

Site

as

hav

ing

a l

ow

UX

O r

isk

ratin

g.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew

Dev

elo

pmen

t at H

ewe

tt S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Num

ber

15

-109

1.01

Pag

e 11

FIN

AL

Rad

on

(E

PS

E

nviro

nm

ent

al D

esk

S

tudy

Rep

ort)

The

Site

is

in a

lo

wer

pro

bab

ility

ra

don

area

, as

les

s th

an 1

% o

f ho

mes

ar

e ab

ove

the

actio

n le

vel

and

whe

re

rad

on

prot

ectio

n

mea

sure

s ar

e no

t req

uire

d.

T

op

og

rap

hic

E

lev

ati

on

(O

rdna

nce

S

urve

y (O

S)

Ma

p)

App

roxi

mat

ely

35 t

o 37

m a

bove

Ord

nanc

e D

atum

(m

aO

D).

D

ep

th t

o

Gro

un

dw

ate

r (I

nter

pret

atio

n fr

om

O

S M

ap

, Ge

olo

gy)

At

leas

t 2

0 m

dep

th b

elo

w g

roun

d le

vel

and

not

ant

icip

ate

d w

ithin

th

e d

epth

of

norm

al e

xcav

atio

ns.

Per

ched

gro

und

wat

er m

ay

be p

rese

nt a

bove

coh

esiv

e la

yers

in t

he

un

satu

rate

d zo

ne.

W

ide

r E

nv

iro

nm

en

t S

en

sit

ive

Re

ce

pto

rs (

EA

Web

S

ite, O

S M

ap)

In t

erm

s of

gro

und

wa

ter

vuln

erab

ility

, th

e S

ite is

on

th

e b

ound

ary

of

an a

rea

clas

sifie

d as

a S

econ

dary

A/S

econ

dar

y U

ndi

ffer

entia

ted

A

quife

r w

ith r

espe

ct t

o su

perf

icia

l ge

olog

y, a

nd

Prin

cipa

l A

quife

r w

ith r

esp

ect t

o th

e be

droc

k ge

olo

gy.

T

he S

ite is

with

in a

Sou

rce

Pro

tect

ion

Zon

e (S

PZ

); Z

one

2.

The

Site

has

no

sig

nific

ant

wat

er f

eatu

res

with

in a

250

m r

adiu

s.

T

he S

ite is

not

ind

icat

ed

to b

e at

ris

k fr

om f

lood

ing

from

riv

ers

or t

he

sea.

P

rev

iou

s T

hir

d

Part

y R

ep

ort

(E

PS

E

nviro

nm

ent

al D

esk

S

tudy

Rep

ort)

The

rep

ort

was

com

plet

ed f

or a

n a

rea

com

pris

ing

the

Site

, in

clud

ing

gr

ass

lan

dsca

ped

scho

ol f

ield

s, a

nd t

he e

xist

ing

har

d pl

ay

cour

t.

His

toric

ally

, th

e a

rea

com

pris

ed u

ndev

elo

ped

agr

icul

tura

l la

nd u

ntil

1928

. M

app

ing

fro

m 1

938

sho

we

d d

eve

lopm

ent

off-

Site

to

the

no

rth-

east

, w

ith s

ome

build

ings

enc

roac

hing

the

Site

to

the

nort

h

and

east

. M

app

ing

from

195

8-1

959

sho

wed

bui

ldin

gs p

rese

nt

on t

he e

ast

of

the

Site

, an

d s

ubst

ant

ial r

esi

dent

ial d

eve

lopm

ent

in t

he

surr

oun

ding

ar

ea.

B

y 1

969-

197

0 th

ese

build

ings

are

ass

umed

dem

olis

hed,

and

the

S

ite is

as

it is

in t

he p

rese

nt d

ay.

Off

-Site

, T

ucks

woo

d F

arm

is

note

d to

th

e so

uth

we

st u

ntil

195

8.

A

llotm

ent

gard

ens

wer

e a

lso

pres

ent

to t

he n

orth

un

til 1

938

. T

he

mai

n sc

hool

bu

ildin

g b

eco

mes

app

aren

t in

the

nor

th f

rom

at

leas

t 19

58.

T

he

repo

rt

was

co

mpl

ete

d

for

assu

med

de

velo

pmen

t of

a

new

sc

hool

, an

d as

soci

ate

d co

mm

unity

fac

ilitie

s.

W

orld

War

II

bom

b st

rikes

wer

e re

cord

ed o

ff-S

ite in

th

e su

rrou

ndin

g

area

to

the

sout

h ea

st,

alth

ough

MA

CC

int

ern

atio

nal c

ateg

oris

e th

e

Site

as

hav

ing

a lo

w U

XO

ris

k ra

ting.

Ke

y C

on

tam

ina

nts

a

nd

CS

M A

sp

ec

ts

The

S

ite

doe

s no

t ha

ve

a cl

earl

y id

ent

ifie

d si

gnifi

cant

fo

rmer

in

dus

tria

l lan

d us

e a

nd t

here

are

no

rela

ted

key

cont

am

inan

ts.

T

he

Site

co

mpr

ised

a

gras

s la

ndsc

aped

sc

hoo

l fie

ld,

with

an

ex

istin

g p

layi

ng

cour

t w

ith a

spha

lt su

rfac

ing.

O

n-S

ite p

ote

ntia

l sou

rces

of

cont

amin

atio

n in

clud

e:

P

ote

ntia

l mad

e gr

oun

d b

elo

w h

ards

tand

ing;

an

d

U

nkno

wn

dem

oliti

on in

clud

ing

the

pot

entia

l for

AC

M in

soi

l.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew D

eve

lopm

ent a

t H

ewet

t S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Nu

mb

er

15

-10

91.0

1

Pa

ge

12

FIN

AL

Off

-Site

pot

ent

ial

sour

ces

of c

onta

min

atio

n ar

e co

nsid

ere

d sm

all,

dist

ant o

r ar

e u

nlik

ely

to h

ave

aff

ecte

d th

e S

ite.

No

sign

ifica

nt s

ourc

es o

f gr

oun

d ga

s h

ave

bee

n id

ent

ified

on/

off-

Site

.

The

Site

is

on t

he

boun

dar

y be

twee

n a

Sec

onda

ry A

/Sec

ond

ary

Und

iffer

entia

ted

Aq

uife

r w

ith

resp

ect

to

sup

erfic

ial

geo

log

y,

and

P

rinci

pal A

quife

r w

ith r

esp

ect

to th

e b

edr

ock

geol

og

y.

The

Site

is w

ithin

an

SP

Z;

Zon

e 2

. R

ede

velo

pmen

t is

pro

pose

d th

at

will

intr

oduc

e s

ensi

tive

rece

ptor

s.

The

sur

roun

ding

are

a w

as s

ubje

ct to

WW

II bo

mbi

ng.

T

he g

eolo

gy

has

pot

entia

l for

dis

solu

tion

feat

ures

.

The

re i

s un

cert

ain

ty b

ecau

se u

nrec

orde

d po

tent

ially

con

tam

inat

ive

ac

tiviti

es c

ould

hav

e ta

ken

plac

e.

3.2

F

ield

wo

rks I

nte

rpre

tati

on

Sc

op

e o

f In

ve

sti

ga

tio

n

Dyn

amic

sam

pler

bor

eho

les

– 5

No

. D

ynam

ic p

enet

ratio

n te

sts

– 10

No.

B

oreh

ole

falli

ng

head

tes

t – 3

No.

S

ite A

rea

= 1

.4 h

ecta

res

(app

rox.

)

Ge

olo

gy

fro

m t

he

B

ore

ho

les

M

ade

Gro

und

/tops

oil c

ompr

isin

g da

rk o

rang

e br

ow

n v

aria

ble

slig

htly

cl

aye

y gr

ave

lly s

and

to d

epth

s of

0.2

2 m

bgl

and

0.8

8 m

bgl

. G

rave

l w

as a

mix

ture

of

bric

k, fl

int

and

conc

rete

. D

S10

1 h

ad a

sur

face

la

yer

of a

spha

lt fr

om g

roun

d le

vel

to 0

.09

m

bgl.

The

un

derl

ying

n

atur

al

soils

co

mpr

ised

va

riab

le

ora

nge

bro

wn

cl

aye

y gr

ave

lly

sand

, an

d

varia

ble

oran

ge

bro

wn

sand

y/gr

ave

lly

cla

ys.

Gra

vel w

as c

hal

k an

d fli

nt.

The

re

wer

e n

o vi

sua

l or

ol

fact

ory

ind

icat

ions

of

si

gnifi

cant

co

ntam

inat

ion

in t

he M

ade

Gro

und

or t

he n

atur

al s

oil.

T

he

natu

ral

soil

was

co

nsid

ered

to

re

pres

ent

th

e pu

blis

hed

supe

rfic

ial

geo

log

y fo

r th

e S

ite.

Bed

rock

was

not

bel

ieve

d to

ha

ve

been

enc

oun

tere

d.

Gro

und

wat

er w

as n

ot e

nco

unte

red

dur

ing

dri

lling

. T

here

w

ere

no

ind

icat

ions

th

at

diss

olut

ion

feat

ures

w

ere

enco

unte

red

, bu

t th

e bo

reh

oles

wer

e w

ide

ly s

pace

d.

Pe

ne

tra

tio

n T

es

t D

ata

(D

PT

s o

r S

PT

s)

DP

T10

1 to

DP

T10

5 ge

ner

ally

rec

orde

d v

aria

ble

low

to

mod

erat

e

resi

stan

ce t

o pe

net

ratio

n t

o s

ched

ule

d co

mpl

etio

n de

pth

s of

6.0

0 m

bg

l.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew

Dev

elo

pmen

t at H

ewe

tt S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Num

ber

15

-109

1.01

Pag

e 13

FIN

AL

DP

T10

6 to

DP

T11

0 re

cord

ed v

aria

ble

low

to

mod

erat

e r

esis

tanc

e to

pe

netr

atio

n to

sch

edul

ed

com

plet

ion

de

pths

of

10.0

0 m

bgl

.

Hig

h

resi

sta

nce

is

sho

wn

in

DP

T10

6,

DP

T10

7,

DP

T10

9 a

nd

DP

T11

0 fr

om

appr

oxim

atel

y 8.

50

m

bgl

whi

ch

is

antic

ipat

ed

to

refle

ct a

cha

nge

in g

eolo

gy.

T

he v

aria

tion

in p

enet

ratio

n re

sist

ance

is

cons

ider

ed

to

be d

ue t

o

the

pres

ence

of

mix

ed a

nd l

aye

red

dis

trib

utio

n of

sof

t to

stif

f cl

ays

an

d lo

ose

to m

ediu

m d

ense

gra

velly

san

d.

B

ore

ho

le F

all

ing

H

ead

Test

Da

ta

One

fil

l of

bo

reho

les

DS

104,

D

S1

05,

DS

107

wer

e co

mpl

eted

. F

allin

g he

ad t

est

resu

lts o

f 3.

75 x

10-7

, 1.

95

x 10

-7 a

nd

1.1

1 x

10-7

m

/s w

ere

ca

lcul

ated

. G

rou

nd

wate

r in

S

tan

dp

ipe

s

13/0

1/20

16,

20/0

1/2

016

an

d 27

/01/

201

6.

DS

101:

Gro

und

wat

er a

t 1.9

2 m

bgl

. D

S10

2: d

ry t

o ba

se 2

.89

m b

gl.

DS

103:

Gro

und

wat

er a

t 1.8

4 m

bgl

..

Gas in

Sta

nd

pip

es

13

/01/

2016

, 20

/01/

201

6 a

nd

27/0

1/20

16.

D

S10

1, D

S1

02, D

S1

03 s

um

mar

y of

wor

st c

ase

rea

ding

s:

The

pea

k co

ncen

trat

ion

for

met

hane

was

1.6

% v

.v (

stea

dy

0.1

%

v.v.

) an

d fo

r ca

rbon

dio

xide

was

1.6

% v

.v.

The

min

imum

con

cent

ratio

n fo

r ox

yge

n w

as 1

6.5

% v

.v.

The

max

imum

flow

rat

e w

as

< 0

.1 l/

hr.

Atm

osph

eric

pr

essu

re

at

grou

nd

leve

l ra

nge

d b

etw

een

997

and

1012

mb.

C

hem

ica

l A

naly

sis

S

ix

sam

ples

w

ere

sc

hed

ule

d fo

r th

e

follo

win

g an

alyt

es:

CLE

A

met

als

suite

, T

PH

(to

tal),

spe

ciat

ed P

AH

(E

PA

-16)

an

d an

asb

esto

s sc

reen

. T

he r

esu

lts h

ave

bee

n co

mpa

red

to t

he

mos

t se

nsiti

ve la

nd

us

es

due

to

unc

erta

inty

ov

er

expo

sure

ci

rcum

stan

ces

and

the

as

sess

men

t is

ther

efor

e co

nser

vativ

e.

Thr

ee o

f th

e sa

mpl

es t

este

d ex

ceed

ed t

he

low

est

ado

pted

crit

eria

fo

r le

ad,

but

the

C4S

L th

resh

old

for

resi

dent

ial

use

was

n

ot

exce

eded

.

DS

101

show

ed i

ncre

ased

lev

els

of n

umer

ous

PAH

’s r

elat

ed t

o co

ntam

inat

ion

in im

port

ed e

ngin

eer

ing

mat

eria

ls.

Thr

ee o

f th

e sa

mpl

es t

este

d w

ere

abo

ve t

he m

ost

cons

erva

tive

UK

cr

iteria

for

be

nzo

(a)p

yren

e.

T

hree

sa

mpl

es

test

ed

wer

e ab

ove

the

LQM

cr

iteri

a fo

r be

nzo

(b)f

luor

ant

hen

e,

and

tw

o sa

mpl

es

abov

e th

e cr

iteria

fo

r di

ben

z(a,

h)a

nthr

ace

ne.

T

PH

was

ab

ove

the

labo

rato

ry m

etho

d de

tect

ion

limit

in t

hree

of

the

sa

mpl

es te

ste

d.

Asb

esto

s fib

res

wer

e no

t det

ecte

d in

the

sam

ples

test

ed.

G

eo

tech

nic

al

Moi

stur

e co

nte

nt

det

erm

inat

ions

, p

last

ic

and

liq

uid

limits

, an

d

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew D

eve

lopm

ent a

t H

ewet

t S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Nu

mb

er

15

-10

91.0

1

Pa

ge

14

FIN

AL

Te

sti

ng

C

alifo

rnia

Bea

ring

Rat

io (

CB

R)

test

s w

ere

car

ried

out

.

Moi

stur

e co

nten

t w

as in

the

ran

ge o

f 10

to 2

5 %

.

Pla

stic

and

liq

uid

limits

pro

duce

d a

pla

stic

ity

ind

ex o

f 17

% f

or

DS

102

at 1

.50

m b

gl.

C

BR

’s w

ere

in t

he r

ang

e 0.

7 %

to 1

.2 %

.

F

ou

nd

ati

on

R

ec

om

me

nd

ati

on

s

The

bo

reho

les

and

pe

net

ratio

n te

sts

have

id

ent

ified

va

riab

le

stre

ngth

and

var

iabl

e m

ixed

san

d/gr

ave

l/cla

y so

il ty

pe

s at

tra

ditio

nal

sp

read

fou

ndat

ion

dep

ths

and

this

is

bel

ieve

d to

be

the

Lo

wes

toft

F

orm

atio

n. T

he L

ow

esto

ft F

orm

atio

n is

a k

now

n va

riabl

e d

epos

it an

d ca

n be

con

sist

ent

firm

to

stiff

cla

y, b

ut h

ere

it is

muc

h m

ore

vari

able

with

fre

quen

t sa

nd

la

yers

an

d lo

w b

low

coun

t re

cord

s. T

he

Low

esto

ft F

orm

atio

n ap

pe

ars

to b

e un

der

lain

by

the

Cra

g in

ferr

ed

from

gr

eate

r re

sist

ance

to

p

enet

ratio

n in

so

me

of

the

DP

Ts.

U

nfor

tuna

tely

, th

e be

droc

k m

ay

als

o b

e va

riab

le a

nd a

lthou

gh n

ot

disc

over

ed i

n th

e in

vest

igat

ion

wea

k C

halk

ma

y be

enc

ount

ered

be

low

sup

erfic

ial d

epos

its.

T

he g

roun

d co

nditi

ons

are

con

side

red

to b

e p

oten

tially

su

itabl

e fo

r tr

aditi

onal

st

rip

or

pad

fo

unda

tions

fo

r sm

all

low

-ris

e st

ruct

ures

. U

sing

ju

dgem

ent

and

expe

rienc

e w

ith

chec

k ca

lcul

atio

ns,

initi

al

asse

ssm

ents

indi

cate

tha

t a

site

-wid

e a

llow

abl

e b

eari

ng p

ress

ure

of

75 k

N/m

2 w

oul

d b

e a

ppr

opr

iate

at

a m

inim

um d

epth

of

0.9

m b

elo

w

exis

ting

gro

und

leve

l a

nd b

ene

ath

any

Mad

e G

roun

d o

r u

nsu

itab

le

soil

in o

rang

e b

row

n sa

nd

or

firm

cla

y. T

he l

imita

tion

on b

eari

ng

capa

city

is

mai

nly

due

to

the

pote

ntia

l fo

r di

ffer

entia

l se

ttle

men

ts

from

wea

k an

d co

mpr

essi

ble

cla

y so

ils d

emon

stra

ted

in t

he

DP

Ts

adja

cent

to

mor

e co

mpe

tent

str

ata.

Loc

al s

hea

r fa

ilure

in

soft

cla

y so

ils is

als

o a

fact

or.

R

einf

orce

men

t of

fo

unda

tions

is

re

com

men

ded

whe

re

vari

able

gr

oun

d co

nditi

ons

are

enc

ount

ered

(sa

nd/c

lay)

or

the

foun

datio

ns

deep

ene

d w

hol

ly to

fou

nd w

ithin

one

mat

eria

l typ

e.

Sho

uld

obvi

ous

ly

loos

e/s

oft

zone

s be

en

coun

tere

d,

foun

datio

n

dept

h sh

ould

be

in

crea

sed

to

mor

e co

mpe

tent

st

rata

or

th

e

foun

datio

n de

sign

ed

to s

pan

the

zon

e.

In

crea

sed

dens

ity o

f gr

oun

d in

vest

igat

ion

ma

y a

llow

zon

ing

of t

he

prop

ose

d ar

ea o

f de

velo

pmen

t to

giv

e a

llow

abl

e be

arin

g pr

essu

re t

o

say

100

-12

5kN

/m2

in id

entif

ied

zone

s.

Due

to

the

pres

ence

of

tree

s/he

dger

ow

s, f

oun

datio

n d

epth

sho

uld

be

rev

iew

ed

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith g

uida

nce

such

as

NH

BC

Sta

ndar

ds

Cha

pter

4.2

as

adv

ised

by

Bui

ldin

g R

egu

latio

ns.

W

here

the

load

ings

or

serv

ice

per

form

ance

des

crib

ed i

s in

suff

icie

nt

for

the

purp

ose

of t

he e

ngin

eeri

ng d

esig

n of

sui

tab

le s

truc

ture

s,

alte

rnat

ive

foun

dat

ions

may

be

req

uire

d a

nd t

his

is l

ikel

y to

be

the

ca

se d

ue t

o ty

pic

al c

olum

n lo

adi

ngs

of

educ

atio

nal

fac

ilitie

s. F

urth

er

inve

stig

atio

n o

f th

e de

eper

geo

log

y is

rec

omm

ende

d w

ith r

esp

ect

to

sele

ctio

n of

pot

ent

ial

alte

rnat

ive

fou

ndat

ions

. G

roun

d i

mpr

ovem

ent

by

ston

e co

lum

ns

may

be

feas

ible

, b

ut

pre

-au

gerin

g m

ay

be

nece

ssar

y to

pe

netr

ate

stiff

cla

ys a

nd t

he c

olu

mn

toe

may

inte

rcep

t w

eak

chal

k in

pl

aces

lim

iting

th

e te

chn

iqu

e ca

paci

ty.

Pile

d

foun

datio

ns a

re c

ons

ider

ed to

be

pot

entia

lly c

ost

effe

ctiv

e co

mpa

red

to

gro

und

im

prov

emen

t us

ing

the

cont

inuo

us f

ligh

t a

uger

sys

tem

.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew

Dev

elo

pmen

t at H

ewe

tt S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Num

ber

15

-109

1.01

Pag

e 15

FIN

AL

Eac

h sy

stem

is

likel

y to

re

quire

hea

vy p

lant

an

d a

suita

ble

wor

king

pl

atfo

rm.

Gro

und

con

ditio

ns

are

in

gen

eral

te

rms

cons

ider

ed

suita

ble

for

grou

nd

bear

ing

floor

sla

bs f

ollo

win

g su

itab

le e

ngin

eer

ed

prep

ara

tion

of

the

form

atio

n.

H

owev

er,

for

smal

l sp

ans,

if

incl

uded

in

re

deve

lopm

ent

prop

osa

ls,

grou

nd

floor

sla

bs a

re r

ecom

men

ded

to

be

susp

end

ed,

with

a

natu

rally

ve

ntila

ted

void

a

nd

dam

p pr

oof

mem

bran

e (D

PM

) pr

ovis

ion

.

Alth

ough

not

enc

oun

tere

d i

n th

e bo

reho

les,

th

ere

is p

oten

tial

for

diss

olu

tion

feat

ures

an

d re

lic b

elo

w g

rou

nd s

truc

ture

s as

soci

ate

d

with

pas

t us

e of

the

Site

. V

igila

nce

is r

equ

ired

dur

ing

gro

und

wor

ks

for

any

unus

ual

grou

nd

cond

itio

ns w

hic

h, i

f en

coun

tere

d,

shou

ld b

e

repo

rted

to t

he C

lient

an

d m

ay w

arra

nt f

urth

er in

vest

igat

ion.

F

urth

er

inve

stig

atio

n an

d

rede

velo

pmen

t p

hase

s w

hich

in

clud

e

brea

king

th

e gr

ound

re

qu

ire

appr

opri

ate

cons

ider

atio

n of

an

d m

itiga

tion

aga

inst

UX

O r

isk.

P

av

em

en

t D

esig

n

CB

R w

as i

n th

e ap

prox

imat

e ra

nge

0.7

to

1.2

% f

or s

and

in D

S10

4

and

cla

yey

sand

in D

S10

5 fr

om b

etw

een

0.5

and

1.0

m b

gl.

CB

R

is

dep

end

ent

on

th

e co

nditi

on

of

the

st

rata

an

d co

uld

be

diff

eren

t up

on

exca

vatio

n

to

the

form

atio

n su

bjec

t to

se

aso

nal

cond

itio

ns.

The

use

of

a ge

otex

tile

is r

ecom

men

ded

whe

re v

aria

ble

gro

und

co

nditi

ons

are

enc

ount

ere

d or

acr

oss

cha

nges

in

stra

ta t

o pr

ote

ct

aga

inst

pot

entia

l diff

eren

tial s

ettle

men

t.

Co

nta

min

ati

on

T

he

Site

d

oes

not

have

a

clea

rly

ide

ntifi

ed

sign

ifica

nt

form

er

ind

ustr

ial l

and

use

and

the

re a

re n

o re

late

d ke

y co

nta

min

ants

. T

he

Site

co

mpr

ised

a

gras

s la

ndsc

aped

sc

hoo

l fie

ld,

with

an

ex

istin

g p

layi

ng

cour

t w

ith a

spha

lt su

rfac

ing.

O

n-S

ite p

ote

ntia

l sou

rces

of

cont

amin

atio

n in

clud

e:

P

ossi

ble

m

ade

gro

und

/impo

rted

en

gine

erin

g

fill

belo

w

hard

stan

ding

; an

d

U

nkno

wn

dem

oliti

on in

clud

ing

the

pot

entia

l for

AC

M in

soi

l. R

ede

velo

pmen

t is

pro

pos

ed

that

will

int

rodu

ce s

ensi

tive

rece

ptor

s an

d la

nd-

use

spec

ific

risk

asse

ssm

ents

are

rec

omm

ende

d b

ased

on

the

resu

lts

in

this

in

vest

igat

ion

. A

ro

bust

a

ppro

ach

ma

y b

e to

en

caps

ula

te s

oil

from

exp

osed

re

cept

ors

usin

g ha

rdst

andi

ngs

and

cl

ean

soil

cove

r.

Vig

ilanc

e on

the

par

t of

the

dev

elop

er t

o e

nsur

e a

ny

unu

sual

gro

und

co

nditi

ons

th

at

cou

ld

repr

esen

t co

nta

min

atio

n is

re

port

ed

to

the

C

lient

. A

lthou

gh c

onsi

dere

d un

likel

y to

be

req

uire

d, t

he

advi

ce o

f th

e lo

cal

pla

nnin

g a

uth

ority

sh

ould

be

so

ught

to

de

term

ine

whe

ther

a

gr

oun

dw

ater

ris

k as

sess

men

t is

nee

ded

.

Fre

sh

Wa

ter

Pip

es

T

he l

ocal

wat

er a

uth

ority

sho

uld

be

con

tact

ed a

t an

ear

ly s

tage

in

or

der

that

an

y ab

nor

mal

cos

ts c

an b

e ca

lcul

ate

d,

if re

qui

red.

C

on

cre

te G

rad

e

Wat

er s

olub

le s

ulp

hat

e co

nce

ntra

tions

wer

e fo

und

to b

e lo

w a

nd t

he

Site

can

pro

visi

onal

ly b

e c

lass

ified

as

Des

ign

Su

lfate

Cla

ss D

S-1

an

d A

ggr

essi

ve

Ch

emic

al

Env

ironm

ent

Cla

ss

AC

EC

A

C-1

in

ac

cord

ance

with

the

BR

E S

peci

al D

iges

t 1.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew D

eve

lopm

ent a

t H

ewet

t S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Nu

mb

er

15

-10

91.0

1

Pa

ge

16

FIN

AL

Gro

un

d G

as

N

o si

gnifi

cant

pot

ent

ial

sour

ces

of g

roun

d ga

s o

n o

r of

f-S

ite h

ave

been

iden

tifie

d.

The

gas

mon

itori

ng r

eve

ale

d lo

w c

once

ntr

atio

ns o

f ca

rbon

dio

xid

e an

d m

etha

ne

and

flow

was

low

. T

he f

ound

atio

n re

com

men

datio

ns i

ncor

por

ate

a de

gree

of

inhe

rent

ga

s pr

otec

tion

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith B

S 8

485:

2015

. G

rou

nd

wa

ter/

D

rain

ag

e

The

gro

und

con

diti

ons

at

the

Site

wer

e f

ound

to

com

pris

e va

riabl

e cl

aye

y gr

ave

lly s

ands

, an

d s

and

y/gr

ave

lly c

lays

. G

roun

dw

ater

was

not

enc

ount

ered

dur

ing

fie

ldw

ork,

ho

wev

er w

as

enco

unte

red

du

ring

re

turn

m

onito

ring

as

sum

ed

to

be

perc

hed/

perc

olat

ing

.

The

fal

ling

hea

d te

sts

wer

e u

nder

take

n in

san

d an

d re

sults

of

3.75

x

10-7

, 1

.95

x 10

-7 a

nd 1

.11

x 10

-7 m

/s w

ere

calc

ulat

ed w

hich

ind

icat

es

poor

dra

inag

e in

coh

esiv

e s

oils

. S

urfa

ce

wat

er

dra

ina

ge

to

land

m

ay

be

feas

ible

vi

a tr

aditi

onal

so

akaw

ays

pro

vide

d t

hat

can

be

site

d w

ithin

dry

sa

nd

wh

ich

ma

y oc

cur

in p

arts

of

the

dev

elo

pmen

t lan

d.

S

houl

d so

akaw

ays

be

pro

pose

d, f

ull-

scal

e te

stin

g to

BR

E 3

65 i

s re

com

men

ded

to c

onfir

m s

uita

bilit

y an

d de

sig

n pa

ram

eter

s.

Car

e is

re

quire

d in

pla

nnin

g so

akaw

ay

loca

tions

and

the

y sh

oul

d b

e lo

cate

d at

sui

tabl

e di

sta

nces

fro

m s

ensi

tive

stru

ctur

es d

ue t

o di

ssol

utio

n

feat

ure

risk.

A

ltern

ativ

es s

uch

as d

isch

arge

to

an e

xist

ing

faci

lity

shou

ld a

lso

be

inve

stig

ate

d.

Exc

av

ati

on

s

Tre

nch

exca

vatio

n si

des

cann

ot

be g

uar

ante

ed t

o be

sta

ble

at t

his

Site

, th

eref

ore,

bat

ters

and

/or

suita

ble

su

ppor

t w

ould

be

requ

ired

for

exca

vatio

ns.

T

his

wou

ld a

lso

be

requ

ired

whe

re h

uman

ent

ry is

nec

essa

ry.

M

ate

rials

M

an

ag

em

en

t E

xcav

ated

so

ils

ma

y be

su

itab

le

for

use

els

ew

her

e su

bjec

t to

su

itab

ility

for

use

an

d an

y ne

cess

ary

reg

ulat

or p

roto

cols

. A

dditi

ona

l te

stin

g m

ay

be r

equ

ired

for

opt

imis

ed o

ff-S

ite d

ispo

sal o

f sp

oil.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

po

sed

Ne

w D

eve

lopm

en

t at

He

we

tt S

cho

ol,

No

rwic

h

Del

ta-S

imon

s P

roje

ct N

umbe

r 15

-109

1.0

1

P

age

17

FIN

AL

Ta

ble

1:

Init

ial C

on

ce

ptu

al S

ite

Mo

de

l &

Ris

k A

ss

es

sm

en

t

So

urc

e

Pa

thw

ay

Re

ce

pto

r M

atr

ix A

ss

ess

me

nt

Ju

sti

fica

tio

n

Po

ten

tially

co

nta

min

ate

d s

oils

a

nd

gro

un

dw

ate

r (f

rom

on

/off

-S

ite s

ou

rce

s o

f co

nta

min

atio

n

and

unre

cord

ed o

n/o

ff-S

ite

sou

rce

s)

A

ssum

es a

sbes

tos

surv

ey

and

re

mo

val o

f al

l id

en

tifie

d A

CM

Ge

olo

gy

(Ve

rtic

al m

igra

tion

thro

ugh

pe

rme

able

de

posi

ts

be

low

th

e S

ite)

Co

ntr

olle

d W

ate

rs

Lo

w R

isk

Sm

all S

ite.

No

sign

ifica

nt o

n/o

ff-S

ite s

our

ces

ide

ntif

ied

. O

verl

ies

Se

con

da

ry A

an

d P

rinci

pal

A

quife

rs. W

ithin

SP

Z.

Lo

w p

erm

eab

ility

so

ils a

nd

thic

k u

n sa

tura

ted

zon

e.

Dir

ect

co

nta

ct/in

ge

stio

n a

nd

inh

ala

tion

of d

ust/

fibre

s a

nd

vap

ou

rs, o

ral v

ia p

lan

t up

take

H

um

an

Hea

lth

Lo

w R

isk

Po

ten

tial l

imite

d s

ourc

es

ide

ntifi

ed

. S

en

sitiv

e

rece

pto

rs t

o b

e in

tro

duce

d.

Lim

ited

exp

osu

re

pa

thw

ays

th

roug

h e

nca

psu

latio

n o

f th

e g

rou

nd.

Dire

ct c

ont

act

an

d le

ach

ing

B

uild

ings

, se

rvic

es a

nd

st

ruct

ure

s L

ow

Ris

k P

oten

tial l

imite

d so

urce

s id

entif

ied.

Gen

eral

ly

rob

ust

rec

ep

tors

.

Gro

un

d g

as

(fro

m u

nre

cord

ed

o

n/o

ff-S

ite s

ou

rces

)

Ver

tical

an

d la

tera

l mig

ratio

n fr

om u

nre

cord

ed o

n-S

ite a

nd

o

ff-S

ite s

ourc

es

Hum

an H

ealth

and

b

uild

ings

V

ery

Low

Ris

k N

o si

gnifi

can

t so

urc

es

iden

tifie

d.

Se

nsiti

ve

rece

pto

rs t

o b

e in

tro

duce

d.

Sta

nda

rd r

isk

defin

itio

ns a

nd

mat

rices

are

pre

sent

ed

in A

ppen

dix

I.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

pose

d N

ew D

evel

opm

ent a

t Hew

ett

Sch

ool,

Nor

wic

h

De

lta-S

imo

ns P

roje

ct N

um

be

r 1

5-1

091

.01

P

ag

e 1

8

FIN

AL

4.0

L

IMIT

AT

ION

S T

O E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L A

SS

ES

SM

EN

TS

Thi

s R

epor

t do

es

not

cons

titut

e a

full

site

in

vest

igat

ion,

flo

od

risk

asse

ssm

ent,

inva

sive

pla

nt a

sses

smen

t, w

aste

cla

ssifi

catio

n ex

erci

se,

cont

amin

atio

n, g

eote

chni

cal

or a

sbes

tos

surv

ey t

o fu

lfil a

ny p

artic

ular

spe

cific

atio

n ex

cept

whe

re s

tate

d ex

plic

itly.

Info

rmat

ion

was

obt

aine

d, r

evie

wed

and

eva

lua

ted

in p

repa

ring

this

Rep

ort

from

vario

us

exte

rnal

so

urce

s.

O

ur

conc

lusi

ons,

op

inio

ns

and

re

com

men

datio

ns

are

base

d up

on t

his

info

rmat

ion

and

the

info

rmat

ion

obta

ined

dur

ing

the

wal

kove

r, t

he

Con

sulta

nt d

oes

not

war

rant

the

acc

urac

y of

the

info

rmat

ion

prov

ided

and

will

not

be

resp

onsi

ble

for

any

opin

ions

exp

ress

ed,

or c

oncl

usio

ns r

each

ed i

n re

lianc

e up

on

info

rmat

ion

whi

ch is

sub

seq

uent

ly p

rove

n to

be

inac

cura

te.

The

rec

omm

enda

tions

con

tain

ed i

n th

is R

epor

t re

pres

ent

our

prof

essi

onal

opi

nion

s.

The

se o

pini

ons

wer

e ar

rived

at

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith g

ood

prac

tice

at t

his

time

and

loca

tion,

an

d as

su

ch

are

not

a gu

aran

tee

that

th

e S

ite

is f

ree

of

haza

rdou

s or

pote

ntia

lly h

azar

dous

mat

eria

ls o

r co

nditi

ons.

Thi

s R

epor

t w

as p

repa

red

for

the

sole

and

exc

lusi

ve u

se o

f th

e C

lient

and

for

the

spec

ific

purp

ose

inst

ruct

ed a

s de

fined

in S

ect

ion

1 of

thi

s R

epor

t. N

othi

ng c

onta

ined

in t

his

Rep

ort

shal

l be

con

stru

ed t

o g

ive

any

right

s or

ben

efits

to

anyo

ne o

ther

tha

n

ours

elve

s an

d th

e C

lient

, an

d al

l du

ties

and

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

unde

rtak

en a

re f

or t

he

sole

and

exc

lusi

ve b

enef

it of

the

Clie

nt a

nd n

ot f

or t

he b

ene

fit o

f an

y ot

her

part

y.

In

part

icul

ar,

this

Rep

ort

shou

ld n

ot b

e di

sse

min

ated

to

anyo

ne o

ther

tha

n th

e C

lient

or

to b

e us

ed o

r re

lied

upon

by

anyo

ne o

ther

tha

n th

e C

lient

. U

se o

f th

e R

epor

t by

any

othe

r pe

rson

is

unau

thor

ised

and

suc

h us

e is

at

the

sole

ris

k of

the

use

r.

Any

one

usin

g o

r re

lyin

g u

pon

this

Rep

ort,

othe

r th

an t

he C

lient

, ag

rees

by

virt

ue o

f its

use

to

inde

mni

fy a

nd h

old

harm

less

the

aut

hors

fro

m a

nd a

gai

nst

all

clai

ms,

los

ses

and

dam

ages

(of

wha

tsoe

ver

natu

re a

nd h

owso

ever

or

whe

nsoe

ver

aris

ing

), a

risin

g ou

t

of o

r re

sulti

ng fr

om th

e pe

rfor

man

ce o

f th

e w

ork

by t

he C

onsu

ltant

.

Ge

oe

nvi

ronm

en

tal R

epo

rt

Pro

po

sed

Ne

w D

eve

lopm

en

t at H

ew

ett

Sch

ool

, N

orw

ich

D

elta

-Sim

ons

Pro

ject

Nu

mb

er

15

-10

91.0

1

Pa

ge

19

FIN

AL

Thi

s R

epor

t was

pre

pare

d by

:

____

____

____

____

____

_

Mal

colm

Tol

ley

D

ate

10th F

ebru

ary

2016

Geo

en

vir

on

men

tal

En

gin

eer

Thi

s R

epor

t was

rev

iew

ed b

y:

____

____

____

____

____

__

Tim

Whe

eler

D

ate

10th F

ebru

ary

2016

Pro

ject

Ma

na

ger

Thi

s R

epor

t was

aut

horis

ed b

y:

____

____

____

____

____

__

Jam

es H

arris

on

D

ate

10th F

ebru

ary

2016

Tec

hn

ica

l D

ire

cto

r

Fig

ure

s

TIT

LE:

Site

Loc

atio

n P

lan

Cec

il R

d, N

orw

ich,

Nor

folk

NR

1 2P

L F

IGU

RE

NO

.:

1D

AT

E: Ja

n 20

16

PR

OJE

CT

NO

.:

15-1

091.

01D

WN

:

NK

T

ITLE

:

Rel

evan

t Fea

ture

s P

lan

Hew

ett S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

FIG

UR

E N

O.:

2D

AT

E: Ja

n 20

16

PR

OJE

CT

NO

.:

15-1

091.

01D

WN

:

NK

Com

men

ts: T

here

is u

ncer

tain

ty a

s un

reco

rded

land

use

may

hav

e oc

curr

ed a

nd c

ause

d co

ntam

inat

ion

that

has

not

bee

n id

entif

ied

by

the

obse

rvat

ions

.

PH

04: E

xist

ing

hard

sta

ndin

g co

urt.

PH

05:N

orth

ern

bou

ndar

y an

d su

rrou

ndin

g sc

hoo

l bui

ldin

gs.

PH

06:M

eta

l fen

ce a

long

so

uth

ern

boun

dary

.

PH

01: N

orth

ern

bou

ndar

y an

d su

rrou

ndin

g sc

hoo

l bui

ldin

gs.

PH

02:G

ener

al s

ite v

iew

and

wes

tern

bo

und

ary.

PH

03:H

edg

ero

w a

long

eas

tern

bou

ndar

y.

TIT

LE:

App

roxi

mat

e Lo

catio

ns o

f B

oreh

oles

and

Pen

etra

tion

Tes

ting

Hew

ett S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

FIG

UR

E N

O.:

3D

AT

E: Dec

201

5

PR

OJE

CT

NO

.:

15-1

091.

01D

WN

:

MT

Nor

th

Not

to

scal

e

Lege

ndD

S101/

DP

T101

Dyn

am

ic S

amp

ler

with

D

yna

mic

Pe

netr

atio

n T

est

DP

T101

Dyn

am

ic P

ene

tra

tion

Te

st

(S)

Sta

ndp

ipe

(SA

) S

oa

kaw

ay

Te

st

(CB

R)

Ca

lifo

rnia

Be

arin

g R

atio

Te

st

DS

10

1/D

PT

10

1

(S)

DS

10

2/D

PT

10

2

(S)

DS

10

3/D

PT

10

3

(S)

DS

10

4/D

PT

10

4

(SA

, C

BR

)

DS

10

5/D

PT

10

5

(SA

, C

BR

)

DP

T110

DP

T108

DP

T107

(SA

, C

BR

)

DP

T106

D

PT

109

Ap

pe

nd

ix I

Apr

il20

09P

age

1of

2

A

cute

orch

roni

cpe

rman

enti

mpa

cton

hum

anhe

alth

.

S

ens

itive

cont

rolle

dw

ater

pollu

tion

ongo

ing,

orju

stab

outt

ooc

cur.

C

atas

trop

hic

colla

pse

C

hron

icpe

rman

ent

impa

cton

hum

anhe

alth

G

radu

alpo

llutio

nof

sen

sitiv

eco

ntr

olle

dw

ater

D

egra

datio

nof

mat

eria

ls

C

hron

icte

mpo

rary

impa

cton

hum

anhe

alth

G

radu

alpo

llutio

nof

non-

sen

sitiv

eco

ntr

olle

dw

ater

N

otic

eabl

ech

ange

,no

n-st

ruct

ural

V

ery

Hig

hR

isk

H

igh

Ris

k

M

ediu

mR

isk

H

igh

Ris

k

M

ediu

mR

isk

Lo

wR

isk

M

ediu

mR

isk

L

ow

Ris

k

V

ery

Low

Ris

k

De

lta-S

imo

nsE

nvi

ron

me

nta

lC

on

sulta

nts

Lim

ited

3 H

enle

y O

ffice

Par

k, D

oddi

ngto

n R

oad,

Linc

oln

LN6

3QR

. S

witc

hboa

rd:0

870

0400

012

Apr

il20

09P

age

2of

2

P

ositi

veev

iden

ceof

haza

rd,p

athw

ayan

dre

cept

or

S

uspe

ctha

zard

,pat

hway

,and

rece

ptor

N

oev

iden

ceof

haza

rd,p

athw

ay,a

ndre

cept

or

D

emon

stra

ble

cont

amin

ated

land

situ

atio

n,hi

ghes

t thr

eat &

liab

ility

leve

l,ur

gent

actio

nre

com

men

ded.

Li

kely

co

ntam

inat

ed

land

si

tuat

ion,

ris

k

asse

ssm

ent

and

ac

tion

reco

mm

ende

d.

P

laus

ible

cont

amin

ated

land

situ

atio

n,ris

k a

sses

smen

tan

dpo

ssib

leac

tion

reco

mm

ende

d.

U

nlik

ely

cont

amin

ated

land

si

tuat

ion,

poss

ible

risk

asse

ssm

ent

and

poss

ible

actio

n.

N

egl

igib

leris

k,n

oac

tion

reco

mm

end

ed

exce

pt

vigi

lan

cefo

rch

ange

sin

cond

ition

s.

De

lta-S

imo

nsE

nvi

ron

me

nta

lC

on

sulta

nts

Lim

ited

3 H

enle

y O

ffice

Par

k, D

oddi

ngto

n R

oad,

Linc

oln

LN6

3QR

. S

witc

hboa

rd:0

870

0400

012

Ap

pe

nd

ix I

I

of

k3.5

40E

-07

unsa

t =m

/sSat

urat

ed

Lo

ca

tio

n:

DS

10

4B

ore

ho

le F

all

ing

He

ad

Te

st

Eng

inee

r:

Sta

tus:

Hew

ett S

choo

lJa

mes

and

Milt

on D

rillin

g Lt

d

Han

d to

ols

RESULT RULES

2. E

nter

all

valu

es in

sha

ded

cells

: A

,F

,L

and

k a

re c

alcu

late

d au

tom

atic

ally

in th

e sp

read

shee

t.

5. If

gro

undw

ater

leve

l is

belo

w te

st, k

is n

ot p

erm

eabi

lity,

but

a r

esul

t of t

he te

st.

6. U

sual

ly t1

=0

and

t2=

60, i

nput

H a

t the

se ti

mes

.

Nor

wic

h

1. A

bor

ehol

e lo

catio

n M

US

T b

e en

tere

d to

gen

erat

e k

.

3. H

ead

is m

easu

red

to th

e ba

se o

f the

BH

, or

use

WL

if hi

gher

.

4. E

nd c

ondi

tions

ref

eren

ced

in B

S 5

930

see

note

s. U

sual

ly d

.

e= S

oil i

n ca

sing

with

bot

tom

at i

mpe

rvio

us b

ound

ary

f= S

oil i

n ca

sing

with

bot

tom

in u

nifo

rm s

oil

d =

Wel

l poi

nt o

r ho

le e

xten

ded

in u

nifo

rm s

oil

GRAPH

Bor

ehol

e E

nd C

ondi

tion

(impo

rtan

t to

get r

ight

)

Inta

ke fa

ctor

, F

Var

iabl

e H

ead,

H1

Tim

e,t 1

Var

iabl

e H

ead,

H2

Tim

e,t 2a =

Soi

l flu

sh w

ith b

otto

m a

t im

perv

ious

bou

ndar

y

b= S

oil f

lush

with

bot

tom

in u

nifo

rm s

oil

Cas

ing

Dep

th

Cas

ing

Dia

met

er,

D

Cro

ss s

ectio

nal a

rea

of c

asin

g, A

Hei

ght o

f cas

ing

abov

e gr

ound

leve

l

App

roxi

mat

e lo

ng te

rm w

ater

tabl

e (o

r ba

se o

f BH

see

rul

es)

c =

Wel

l poi

nt o

r ho

le e

xten

ded

at im

perv

ious

bou

ndar

y

mmin

min

0.64

0 60

0.01

19 3

2.08

48

m

0.33

00

1.87

86

m m m m

d

0.80

0

m

0.01

1m

2.08

48

m

0.01

21

0.24

00

Diff

eren

ce in

Len

gth

betw

een

botto

m o

f cas

ing/

bore

hole

, L

Wat

er D

epth

1.20

0

0.00

0

0.12

0

1.20

0

60.0

00.

560

0.64

0

40.0

00.

550

0.65

0

50.0

00.

550

0.65

0

20.0

00.

520

0.68

0

30.0

00.

540

0.66

0

12.0

00.

480

0.72

0

15.0

00.

500

0.70

0

7.00

0.44

00.

760

10.0

00.

460

0.74

0

3.00

0.40

00.

800

5.00

0.43

00.

770

0.00

0.30

01.

200

0.90

0

1.00

0.38

00.

820

0.90

0

0.30

0

INPUT PARAMETERS

Gen

eral

App

roac

h (a

fter

BS

593

0:19

99):

Whe

re :

Tim

e (m

in)

Wat

er D

epth

(m

)H

ead

(m)

mB

oreh

ole

Dep

th

A

is th

e pe

rmea

bilit

y of

the

soil

(see

rul

es b

elow

)

F H1

H2

is th

e va

riabl

e he

ad m

easu

red

at ti

me

t 2 a

fter

the

com

men

cem

ent o

f the

test

is th

e va

riabl

e he

ad m

easu

red

at ti

me

t 1 a

fter

the

com

men

cem

ent o

f the

test

is th

e in

take

fact

or

is th

e cr

oss

sect

iona

l are

a of

the

bore

hole

cas

ing

©D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

ironm

enta

lC

onsu

ltant

sLi

mite

d.N

opa

rtof

this

docu

men

tm

aybe

repr

oduc

edun

less

prio

rw

ritte

npe

rmis

sion

has

bee

n gr

ante

d.P

rofo

rma:

C130

Pro

ject

No:

Clie

nt:

Loca

tion:

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

k

FIELD MEASUREMENTS

Dat

e:

She

et:

MT

06/0

1/20

16

11

Mac

e G

roup

15-1

091.

01

Co-

ords

(X

,Y):

Pla

nt U

sed:

Con

trac

tor:

Leve

l (Z

):

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0.00

10.0

020

.00

30.0

040

.00

50.0

060

.00

Head (m)

Tim

e (

min

)

1

21

2

log

eA

Hk

Ft

tH

of

k1.9

52E

-07

unsa

t =m

/sSat

urat

ed

Lo

ca

tio

n:

DS

10

5B

ore

ho

le F

all

ing

He

ad

Te

st

Eng

inee

r:

Sta

tus:

Hew

ett S

choo

lJa

mes

and

Milt

on D

rillin

g Lt

d

Han

d to

ols

RESULT RULES

2. E

nter

all

valu

es in

sha

ded

cells

: A

,F

,L

and

k a

re c

alcu

late

d au

tom

atic

ally

in th

e sp

read

shee

t.

5. If

gro

undw

ater

leve

l is

belo

w te

st, k

is n

ot p

erm

eabi

lity,

but

a r

esul

t of t

he te

st.

6. U

sual

ly t1

=0

and

t2=

60, i

nput

H a

t the

se ti

mes

.

Nor

wic

h

1. A

bor

ehol

e lo

catio

n M

US

T b

e en

tere

d to

gen

erat

e k

.

3. H

ead

is m

easu

red

to th

e ba

se o

f the

BH

, or

use

WL

if hi

gher

.

4. E

nd c

ondi

tions

ref

eren

ced

in B

S 5

930

see

note

s. U

sual

ly d

.

e= S

oil i

n ca

sing

with

bot

tom

at i

mpe

rvio

us b

ound

ary

f= S

oil i

n ca

sing

with

bot

tom

in u

nifo

rm s

oil

d =

Wel

l poi

nt o

r ho

le e

xten

ded

in u

nifo

rm s

oil

GRAPH

Bor

ehol

e E

nd C

ondi

tion

(impo

rtan

t to

get r

ight

)

Inta

ke fa

ctor

, F

Var

iabl

e H

ead,

H1

Tim

e,t 1

Var

iabl

e H

ead,

H2

Tim

e,t 2a =

Soi

l flu

sh w

ith b

otto

m a

t im

perv

ious

bou

ndar

y

b= S

oil f

lush

with

bot

tom

in u

nifo

rm s

oil

Cas

ing

Dep

th

Cas

ing

Dia

met

er,

D

Cro

ss s

ectio

nal a

rea

of c

asin

g, A

Hei

ght o

f cas

ing

abov

e gr

ound

leve

l

App

roxi

mat

e lo

ng te

rm w

ater

tabl

e (o

r ba

se o

f BH

see

rul

es)

c =

Wel

l poi

nt o

r ho

le e

xten

ded

at im

perv

ious

bou

ndar

y

mmin

min

0.63

0 60

0.01

51 3

1.78

50

m

0.33

00

1.59

25

m m m m

d

0.70

0

m

0.01

1m

1.78

50

m

0.01

54

0.24

00

Diff

eren

ce in

Len

gth

betw

een

botto

m o

f cas

ing/

bore

hole

, L

Wat

er D

epth

1.20

0

0.00

0

0.12

0

1.20

0

60.0

00.

570

0.63

0

40.0

00.

550

0.65

0

50.0

00.

560

0.64

0

20.0

00.

530

0.67

0

30.0

00.

540

0.66

0

12.0

00.

530

0.67

0

15.0

00.

530

0.67

0

7.00

0.52

00.

680

10.0

00.

530

0.67

0

3.00

0.50

00.

700

5.00

0.51

00.

690

0.00

0.50

01.

200

0.70

0

1.00

0.50

00.

700

0.70

0

0.50

0

INPUT PARAMETERS

Gen

eral

App

roac

h (a

fter

BS

593

0:19

99):

Whe

re :

Tim

e (m

in)

Wat

er D

epth

(m

)H

ead

(m)

mB

oreh

ole

Dep

th

A

is th

e pe

rmea

bilit

y of

the

soil

(see

rul

es b

elow

)

F H1

H2

is th

e va

riabl

e he

ad m

easu

red

at ti

me

t 2 a

fter

the

com

men

cem

ent o

f the

test

is th

e va

riabl

e he

ad m

easu

red

at ti

me

t 1 a

fter

the

com

men

cem

ent o

f the

test

is th

e in

take

fact

or

is th

e cr

oss

sect

iona

l are

a of

the

bore

hole

cas

ing

©D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

ironm

enta

lC

onsu

ltant

sLi

mite

d.N

opa

rtof

this

docu

men

tm

aybe

repr

oduc

edun

less

prio

rw

ritte

npe

rmis

sion

has

bee

n gr

ante

d.P

rofo

rma:

C130

Pro

ject

No:

Clie

nt:

Loca

tion:

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

k

FIELD MEASUREMENTS

Dat

e:

She

et:

MT

06/0

1/20

16

11

Mac

e G

roup

15-1

091.

01

Co-

ords

(X

,Y):

Pla

nt U

sed:

Con

trac

tor:

Leve

l (Z

):

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.00

10.0

020

.00

30.0

040

.00

50.0

060

.00

Head (m)

Tim

e (

min

)

1

21

2

log

eA

Hk

Ft

tH

of

k1.1

07E

-07

unsa

t =m

/sSat

urat

ed

Lo

ca

tio

n:

DS

10

7B

ore

ho

le F

all

ing

He

ad

Te

st

Eng

inee

r:

Sta

tus:

Hew

ett S

choo

lJa

mes

and

Milt

on D

rillin

g Lt

d

Han

d to

ols

RESULT RULES

2. E

nter

all

valu

es in

sha

ded

cells

: A

,F

,L

and

k a

re c

alcu

late

d au

tom

atic

ally

in th

e sp

read

shee

t.

5. If

gro

undw

ater

leve

l is

belo

w te

st, k

is n

ot p

erm

eabi

lity,

but

a r

esul

t of t

he te

st.

6. U

sual

ly t1

=0

and

t2=

60, i

nput

H a

t the

se ti

mes

.

Nor

wic

h

1. A

bor

ehol

e lo

catio

n M

US

T b

e en

tere

d to

gen

erat

e k

.

3. H

ead

is m

easu

red

to th

e ba

se o

f the

BH

, or

use

WL

if hi

gher

.

4. E

nd c

ondi

tions

ref

eren

ced

in B

S 5

930

see

note

s. U

sual

ly d

.

e= S

oil i

n ca

sing

with

bot

tom

at i

mpe

rvio

us b

ound

ary

f= S

oil i

n ca

sing

with

bot

tom

in u

nifo

rm s

oil

d =

Wel

l poi

nt o

r ho

le e

xten

ded

in u

nifo

rm s

oil

GRAPH

Bor

ehol

e E

nd C

ondi

tion

(impo

rtan

t to

get r

ight

)

Inta

ke fa

ctor

, F

Var

iabl

e H

ead,

H1

Tim

e,t 1

Var

iabl

e H

ead,

H2

Tim

e,t 2a =

Soi

l flu

sh w

ith b

otto

m a

t im

perv

ious

bou

ndar

y

b= S

oil f

lush

with

bot

tom

in u

nifo

rm s

oil

Cas

ing

Dep

th

Cas

ing

Dia

met

er,

D

Cro

ss s

ectio

nal a

rea

of c

asin

g, A

Hei

ght o

f cas

ing

abov

e gr

ound

leve

l

App

roxi

mat

e lo

ng te

rm w

ater

tabl

e (o

r ba

se o

f BH

see

rul

es)

c =

Wel

l poi

nt o

r ho

le e

xten

ded

at im

perv

ious

bou

ndar

y

mmin

min

0.83

0 60

0.01

19 3

2.08

48

m

0.33

00

1.87

86

m m m m

d

0.89

0

m

0.01

1m

2.08

48

m

0.01

21

0.24

00

Diff

eren

ce in

Len

gth

betw

een

botto

m o

f cas

ing/

bore

hole

, L

Wat

er D

epth

1.20

0

0.00

0

0.12

0

1.20

0

60.0

00.

370

0.83

0

40.0

00.

350

0.85

0

50.0

00.

360

0.84

0

20.0

00.

330

0.87

0

30.0

00.

340

0.86

0

12.0

00.

320

0.88

0

15.0

00.

320

0.88

0

7.00

0.31

00.

890

10.0

00.

310

0.89

0

3.00

0.31

00.

890

5.00

0.31

00.

890

0.00

0.30

01.

200

0.90

0

1.00

0.30

00.

900

0.90

0

0.30

0

INPUT PARAMETERS

Gen

eral

App

roac

h (a

fter

BS

593

0:19

99):

Whe

re :

Tim

e (m

in)

Wat

er D

epth

(m

)H

ead

(m)

mB

oreh

ole

Dep

th

A

is th

e pe

rmea

bilit

y of

the

soil

(see

rul

es b

elow

)

F H1

H2

is th

e va

riabl

e he

ad m

easu

red

at ti

me

t 2 a

fter

the

com

men

cem

ent o

f the

test

is th

e va

riabl

e he

ad m

easu

red

at ti

me

t 1 a

fter

the

com

men

cem

ent o

f the

test

is th

e in

take

fact

or

is th

e cr

oss

sect

iona

l are

a of

the

bore

hole

cas

ing

©D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

ironm

enta

lC

onsu

ltant

sLi

mite

d.N

opa

rtof

this

docu

men

tm

aybe

repr

oduc

edun

less

prio

rw

ritte

npe

rmis

sion

has

bee

n gr

ante

d.P

rofo

rma:

C130

Pro

ject

No:

Clie

nt:

Loca

tion:

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

k

FIELD MEASUREMENTS

Dat

e:

She

et:

MT

06/0

1/20

16

11

Mac

e G

roup

15-1

091.

01

Co-

ords

(X

,Y):

Pla

nt U

sed:

Con

trac

tor:

Leve

l (Z

):

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0.00

10.0

020

.00

30.0

040

.00

50.0

060

.00

Head (m)

Tim

e (

min

)

1

21

2

log

eA

Hk

Ft

tH

K

EY

TO

BO

RE

HO

LE

AN

D T

RIA

L P

IT L

OG

S

Do

cu

men

t N

o:

D10

4 V

ers

ion

: 1.

0 Is

su

e D

ate

: 30

/04/

15

Au

tho

r: D

Elli

s A

uth

ori

sed

by:

R G

riffit

hs

Pag

e:

1 of

2

© D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

iron

me

ntal

Co

nsul

tant

s Li

mite

d. N

o p

art

of th

is d

ocu

me

nt m

ay

be r

epr

oduc

ed

unl

ess

prio

r w

ritte

n p

erm

issi

on h

as

bee

n g

ran

ted.

M

AT

ER

IAL

LE

GE

ND

S

Top

soil

Mad

e G

roun

d

Mad

e G

roun

d 2

Con

cret

e

Cla

y

Silt

San

d

Gra

vel

Pea

t

Cob

bles

Bou

lder

s

Mud

ston

e

Silt

ston

e

San

dsto

ne

Lim

esto

ne

Cha

lk

Coa

l

Bre

ccia

Con

glo

mer

ate

Igne

ous

Met

amor

phic

Vol

cano

clas

tic

Gyp

sum

Sha

le

Iron

ston

e

Bed

rock

(U

nide

ntifi

ed)

Voi

d

IN

ST

AL

LA

TIO

N /

BA

CK

FIL

L L

EG

EN

DS

San

d

Gra

vel

Ben

toni

te

Cem

ent/G

rout

Aris

ing

s

Con

cret

e

Pla

in P

ipe

Slo

tted

Pip

e

Pie

zom

eter

Tip

Le

ge

nd s

ymb

ols

in g

ene

ral a

cco

rdan

ce w

ith B

S 5

930

(1

999

) a

nd

AG

S.

K

EY

TO

BO

RE

HO

LE

AN

D T

RIA

L P

IT L

OG

S

Do

cu

men

t N

o:

D10

4 V

ers

ion

: 1.

0 Is

su

e D

ate

: 30

/04/

15

Au

tho

r: D

Elli

s A

uth

ori

sed

by:

R G

riffit

hs

Pag

e:

2 of

2

© D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

iron

me

ntal

Co

nsul

tant

s Li

mite

d. N

o p

art

of th

is d

ocu

me

nt m

ay

be r

epr

oduc

ed

unl

ess

prio

r w

ritte

n p

erm

issi

on h

as

bee

n g

ran

ted.

SA

MP

LE

TY

PE

S

AC

M

Asb

esto

s C

on

tain

ing

Ma

teri

al S

am

ple

B

Bu

lk D

istu

rbe

d S

am

ple

BL

K

Blo

ck S

amp

le

C

Cor

e S

amp

le

CB

R

Un

dis

turb

ed S

am

ple

fo

r C

alifo

rnia

Bea

ring

Ra

tio T

est

– 1

54m

m d

iam

ete

r

D

Dis

turb

ed S

ampl

e -

Tu

b

ES

S

oil

Sam

ple

fo

r E

nvi

ronm

en

tal T

est

ing

EW

W

ate

r S

ampl

e f

or

En

viro

nme

nta

l Te

stin

g

J

Dis

turb

ed S

ampl

e -

Jar

U

Un

dis

turb

ed D

rive

n T

ub

e S

am

ple

– 7

0/1

02m

m d

iam

ete

r, 4

50m

m lo

ng

U(P

) U

nd

istu

rbed

Pu

she

d P

isto

n S

amp

le –

10

2m

m d

iam

ete

r, 4

50m

m lo

ng

U(T

W)

Und

istu

rbed

Th

in W

alle

d P

ush

In S

amp

le –

10

0m

m d

iam

ete

r, 4

50m

m lo

ng

V

Dis

turb

ed S

ampl

e -

Via

l

TE

ST

TY

PE

S

CP

T

Con

e P

ene

trom

eter

Te

st (

kN/m

2)

FID

F

lam

e Io

nisa

tion

Det

ecto

r T

est

(pp

m)

HS

V

In-S

itu H

an

d S

hee

r V

an

e T

est

(kN

/m2)

PID

P

ho

toio

nis

atio

n D

ete

cto

r T

est

(p

pm

)

SP

T (

S)

Sta

nd

ard

Pe

netr

atio

n T

est

– S

plit

Sp

oo

n S

am

ple

r

SP

T (

C)

Sta

nd

ard

Pe

netr

atio

n T

est

– S

olid

60

Deg

ree

Con

e

CO

RE

DE

TA

ILS

If

Fra

ctur

e S

paci

ng

(mm

) –

Min

imu

m, A

vera

ge

, Ma

xim

um

NI

Non

-Int

act w

her

e >

25 f

ract

ure

sp

acin

gs p

er

met

re

TC

R

To

tal C

ore

Rec

ove

ry (

%)

SC

R

Sol

id C

ore

Rec

ove

ry (

%)

RQ

D

Roc

k Q

ualit

y D

esig

nat

ion

(%)

AF

A

ir F

lush

Ret

urn

(%)

WF

W

ate

r F

lush

Ret

urn

(%

)

W

AT

ER

CO

LU

MN

DE

TA

ILS

F

irst

Wat

er S

trik

e,

Sec

ond

Wat

er S

trik

e e

tc.

S

tan

din

g W

ate

r Le

vel –

Firs

t S

trik

e, S

eco

nd

Str

ike

etc

.

S

ee

pa

ge

Ap

pe

nd

ix I

II

Pro

ject

Num

ber:

Per

sonn

el:

Flow Peak

Flow Steady

CH4 Peak

CH4 Steady

CO2 Peak

CO2 Steady

O2 Min.

O2 Steady

Atmospheric Pressure

PID

Well I.D.

Depth to Product (DTP)

Product Thickness

Depth to Water (DTW)

Depth to Base (DTB)

Height of Water Column

(L/h

r)(L

/hr)

(%v/

v)(%

v/v)

(%v/

v)(%

v/v)

(%v/

v)(%

v/v)

(mb)

(ppm

)(m

m)

(m)

(m)

(m)

(m)

(m)

DS

101

<0.

1<

0.1

<0.

1<

0.1

0.5

0.4

19.5

19.7

1006

1.92

02.

940

DS

102

<0.

1<

0.1

<0.

1<

0.1

0.5

0.5

20.3

20.3

1006

Dry

2.77

0

DS

103

<0.

1<

0.1

<0.

1<

0.1

1.1

1.1

16.5

16.5

1006

2.50

02.

970

1935

5050

7510

0

1819

1938

3838

412

226

1323

Do

cu

me

nt

No

. C

10

1

© D

elt

a-S

imo

ns E

nvir

on

men

tal C

on

su

ltan

ts L

imit

ed

. N

o p

art

of

this

do

cu

men

t m

ay b

e r

ep

rod

uced

un

less p

rio

r w

ritt

en

perm

issio

n h

as b

een

gra

nte

d.

LOC

AT

ION

Wea

ther

Con

ditio

ns:

Dia

met

er o

f Cas

ing

(mm

)

Gas

Kit

Mod

el:

15-1

091.

01

Ove

rcas

t

To

calc

ulat

e th

e nu

mbe

r of

litr

es to

be

purg

ed fr

om a

wel

l with

a d

iffer

ent d

iam

eter

, use

the

form

ula

3r2

h (

whe

re r

= r

adiu

s of

the

wel

l and

h =

hei

ght

of th

e w

ater

col

umn)

. U

se th

e fo

rmul

a r2

h to

cal

cula

te th

e vo

lum

e of

a b

aile

r. P

leas

e no

te th

at th

e st

anda

rd b

aile

rs D

elta

-Sim

ons

use

are

typi

cally

0.

95 m

in le

ngth

.

NO

TE

S

NK

Gas

Dat

a G

FM

430

Gas

Kit

Ser

ial N

o:

Sh

ee

t:

1o

f1

G

RO

UN

DW

AT

ER

AN

D G

RO

UN

D G

AS

MO

NIT

OR

ING

RE

CO

RD

SH

EE

T

Ver

sion

: 4.0

Aut

hor:

C R

amsb

otto

mA

utho

rise

d B

y: R

Gri

ffith

s

No.

bai

ls p

er m

GU

IDE

TO

PU

RG

ING

VO

LUM

ES

Dia

met

er o

f Bai

ler

(mm

)

Issu

e D

ate:

13/

01/1

2

13

/00

1/2

01

6

Pro

ject

Nam

e:H

ewet

t Sch

ool,

Nor

wic

hD

ate

:

Pro

ject

Num

ber:

Per

sonn

el:

Flow Peak

Flow Steady

CH4 Peak

CH4 Steady

CO2 Peak

CO2 Steady

O2 Min.

O2 Steady


PID

Well I.D.


Product Thickness


Depth to Base (DTB)


(L/h

r)(L

/hr)

(%v/

v)(%

v/v)

(%v/

v)(%

v/v)

(%v/

v)(%

v/v)

(mb)

(ppm

)(m

m)

(m)

(m)

(m)

(m)

(m)

DS

101

<0.

1<

0.1

<0.

1<

0.1

1.2

0.4

19.8

20.7

1012

2.32

02.

990

DS

102

<0.

1<

0.1

0.1

<0.

10.

60.

620

.420

.410

12D

ry2.

890

DS

103

<0.

1<

0.1

<0.

1<

0.1

1.6

1.6

19.6

19.7

1012

2.67

03.

010

1935

5050

7510

0

1819

1938

3838

412

226

1323

Do

cu

me

nt

No

. C

10

1

© D

elt

a-S

imo

ns E

nvir

on

men

tal C

on

su

ltan

ts L

imit

ed

. N

o p

art

of

this

do

cu

men

t m

ay b

e r

ep

rod

uced

un

less p

rio

r w

ritt

en

perm

issio

n h

as b

een

gra

nte

d.

20

/01

/20

16

Pro

ject

Nam

e:H

ewet

t Sch

ool,

Nor

wic

hD

ate

:

Ver

sion

: 4.0

Aut

hor:

C R

amsb

otto

mA

utho

rise

d B

y: R

Gri

ffith

s

No.

bai

ls p

er m

GU

IDE

TO

PU

RG

ING

VO

LUM

ES

Dia

met

er o

f Bai

ler

(mm

)

Issu

e D

ate:

13/

01/1

2

Sh

ee

t:

1o

f1

G

RO

UN

DW

AT

ER

AN

D G

RO

UN

D G

AS

MO

NIT

OR

ING

RE

CO

RD

SH

EE

T

Ove

rcas

t

To

calc

ulat

e th

e nu

mbe

r of

litr

es to

be

purg

ed fr

om a

wel

l with

a d

iffer

ent d

iam

eter

, use

the

form

ula

3r2

h (

whe

re r

= r

adiu

s of

the

wel

l and

h =

hei

ght

of th

e w

ater

col

umn)

. U

se th

e fo

rmul

a r2

h to

cal

cula

te th

e vo

lum

e of

a b

aile

r. P

leas

e no

te th

at th

e st

anda

rd b

aile

rs D

elta

-Sim

ons

use

are

typi

cally

0.

95 m

in le

ngth

.

NO

TE

S

NK

Gas

Dat

a G

FM

430

Gas

Kit

Ser

ial N

o:

LOC

AT

ION

Wea

ther

Con

ditio

ns:

Dia

met

er o

f Cas

ing

(mm

)

Gas

Kit

Mod

el:

15-1

091.

01P

roje

ct N

umbe

r:

Per

sonn

el:

Flow Peak

Flow Steady

CH4 Peak

CH4 Steady

CO2 Peak

CO2 Steady

O2 Min.

O2 Steady


PID

Well I.D.


Product Thickness


Depth to Base (DTB)


(L/h

r)(L

/hr)

(%v/

v)(%

v/v)

(%v/

v)(%

v/v)

(%v/

v)(%

v/v)

(mb)

(ppm

)(m

m)

(m)

(m)

(m)

(m)

(m)

DS

101

<0.

1<

0.1

<0.

1<

0.1

0.8

0.4

20.4

20.5

997

2.54

02.

980

DS

102

<0.

1<

0.1

<0.

1<

0.1

0.5

0.5

20.4

20.4

997

Dry

2.88

0

DS

103

<0.

1<

0.1

1.6

<0.

11.

20.

920

.419

.999

81.

840

2.99

0

1935

5050

7510

0

1819

1938

3838

412

226

1323

Do

cu

me

nt

No

. C

10

1

© D

elt

a-S

imo

ns E

nvir

on

men

tal C

on

su

ltan

ts L

imit

ed

. N

o p

art

of

this

do

cu

men

t m

ay b

e r

ep

rod

uced

un

less p

rio

r w

ritt

en

perm

issio

n h

as b

een

gra

nte

d.

27

/01

/20

16

Pro

ject

Nam

e:H

ewet

t Sch

ool,

Nor

wic

hD

ate

:

Ver

sion

: 4.0

Aut

hor:

C R

amsb

otto

mA

utho

rise

d B

y: R

Gri

ffith

s

No.

bai

ls p

er m

GU

IDE

TO

PU

RG

ING

VO

LUM

ES

Dia

met

er o

f Bai

ler

(mm

)

Issu

e D

ate:

13/

01/1

2

Sh

ee

t:

1o

f1

G

RO

UN

DW

AT

ER

AN

D G

RO

UN

D G

AS

MO

NIT

OR

ING

RE

CO

RD

SH

EE

T

Ove

rcas

t

To

calc

ulat

e th

e nu

mbe

r of

litr

es to

be

purg

ed fr

om a

wel

l with

a d

iffer

ent d

iam

eter

, use

the

form

ula

3r2

h (

whe

re r

= r

adiu

s of

the

wel

l and

h =

hei

ght

of th

e w

ater

col

umn)

. U

se th

e fo

rmul

a r2

h to

cal

cula

te th

e vo

lum

e of

a b

aile

r. P

leas

e no

te th

at th

e st

anda

rd b

aile

rs D

elta

-Sim

ons

use

are

typi

cally

0.

95 m

in le

ngth

.

NO

TE

S

NK

Gas

Dat

a G

FM

430

Gas

Kit

Ser

ial N

o:

LOC

AT

ION

Wea

ther

Con

ditio

ns:

Dia

met

er o

f Cas

ing

(mm

)

Gas

Kit

Mod

el:

15-1

091.

01

Ap

pe

nd

ix I

VC

hem

test

Ltd

.

Dep

ot

Ro

ad

New

mark

et

CB

8 0

AL

Tel:

01638 6

06070

Em

ail

: in

fo@

ch

em

test.

co

.uk

Rep

ort

No

.:16

-004

90-1

Init

ial

Date

of

Iss

ue

:18

-Jan

-201

6

Cli

en

tD

elta

Sim

ons

Cli

en

t A

dd

res

s:

3 H

enle

y O

ffic

e P

ark

Dod

ding

ton

Roa

d Li

ncol

n Li

ncol

nshi

re

LN6

3QR

Co

nta

ct(

s):

Mal

colm

Tol

ley

Pro

ject

15-1

091.

01 H

ewet

t S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

Qu

ota

tio

n N

o.:

Date

Receiv

ed

:12

-Jan

-201

6

Ord

er

No

.:45

74D

ate

In

str

uc

ted

:12

-Jan

-201

6

No

. o

f S

am

ple

s:

9T

arg

et

Date

:18

-Jan

-201

6

Tu

rnaro

un

d (

Wkd

ays):

5R

esu

lts D

ue:

18-J

an-2

016

Date

Ap

pro

ved

:18

-Jan

-201

6

Ap

pro

ved

By:

Deta

ils

:P

hil H

ellie

r, P

roje

ct D

irect

or

Fin

al R

ep

ort

Page

1 o

f 4

Resu

lts -

So

il

Cli

en

t: D

elt

a S

imo

ns

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

Quo

tatio

n N

o.:

2389

6923

8970

2389

7123

8972

2389

7323

8974

2389

7523

8976

2389

77O

rder

No.

: 45

74D

S10

1D

S10

2D

S10

2D

S10

3D

S10

4D

S10

5D

S10

1D

S10

1D

S10

2E

S2

ES

1E

S2

ES

1E

S1

ES

2E

S3

D4

D4

SO

ILS

OIL

SO

ILS

OIL

SO

ILS

OIL

SO

ILS

OIL

SO

IL0.

300.

100.

300.

100.

100.

300.

501.

001.

0006

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

6D

ete

rmin

an

dA

ccre

d.

SO

PU

nit

sL

OD

AC

M T

ype

U21

92N

/A-

--

--

-

Asb

esto

s Id

entif

icat

ion

U21

92%

0.00

1N

o A

sbes

tos

Det

ecte

dN

o A

sbes

tos

Det

ecte

dN

o A

sbes

tos

Det

ecte

dN

o A

sbes

tos

Det

ecte

dN

o A

sbes

tos

Det

ecte

dN

o A

sbes

tos

Det

ecte

dM

oist

ure

N20

30%

0.02

07.

619

1420

1913

1215

11S

tone

sN

2030

%0.

020

< 0

.020

< 0

.020

Soi

l Col

our

N20

40N

/Abr

own

brow

nbr

own

brow

nbr

own

brow

nbr

own

brow

nbr

own

Oth

er M

ater

ial

N20

40N

/Ast

ones

root

sro

ots

root

sro

ots

ston

es,

root

sst

ones

none

ston

esS

oil T

extu

reN

2040

N/A

sand

sand

loam

sand

loam

sand

sand

clay

loam

pHM

2010

N/A

7.3

9.3

8.0

7.6

Mag

nesi

um (

Wat

er S

olub

le)

N21

20g/

l0.

010

< 0

.010

< 0

.010

< 0

.010

< 0

.010

Sul

phat

e (2

:1 W

ater

Sol

uble

) as

SO

4M

2120

g/l

0.01

0<

0.0

10<

0.0

10<

0.0

10<

0.0

10T

otal

Sul

phur

M21

75%

0.01

00.

027

0.04

9C

hlor

ide

(Ext

ract

able

)M

2220

g/l

0.01

0<

0.0

10<

0.0

10N

itrat

e (E

xtra

ctab

le)

N22

20g/

l0.

010

< 0

.010

< 0

.010

Am

mon

ium

M24

25m

g/kg

0.50

3.2

0.87

Sul

phat

e (A

cid

Sol

uble

)M

2430

%0.

010

0.03

60.

061

Ars

enic

M24

50m

g/kg

1.0

2015

116.

27.

24.

0C

adm

ium

M24

50m

g/kg

0.10

0.28

0.23

0.19

0.12

0.17

0.13

Cop

per

M24

50m

g/kg

0.50

2224

3012

2215

Mer

cury

M24

50m

g/kg

0.10

0.13

0.25

0.18

< 0

.10

0.16

0.11

Nic

kel

M24

50m

g/kg

0.50

2817

2016

2115

Lead

M24

50m

g/kg

0.50

7812

083

2787

54S

elen

ium

M24

50m

g/kg

0.20

< 0

.20

0.53

0.28

0.26

0.26

0.22

Zin

cM

2450

mg/

kg0.

5069

8982

4777

55C

hrom

ium

(T

rival

ent)

N24

90m

g/kg

5.0

2615

1713

1713

Chr

omiu

m (

Hex

aval

ent)

N24

90m

g/kg

0.50

< 0

.50

< 0

.50

< 0

.50

< 0

.50

< 0

.50

< 0

.50

Tot

al T

PH

>C

6-C

40M

2670

mg/

kg10

4400

4822

< 1

0<

10

< 1

0N

apht

hale

neM

2700

mg/

kg0.

107.

90.

200.

34<

0.1

0<

0.1

0<

0.1

0A

cena

phth

ylen

eM

2700

mg/

kg0.

106.

50.

180.

15<

0.1

0<

0.1

0<

0.1

0A

cena

phth

ene

M27

00m

g/kg

0.10

260.

250.

20<

0.1

0<

0.1

0<

0.1

0F

luor

ene

M27

00m

g/kg

0.10

260.

320.

29<

0.1

0<

0.1

0<

0.1

0P

hena

nthr

ene

M27

00m

g/kg

0.10

200

2.6

2.2

< 0

.10

< 0

.10

< 0

.10

Ant

hrac

ene

M27

00m

g/kg

0.10

460.

610.

72<

0.1

0<

0.1

0<

0.1

0F

luor

anth

ene

M27

00m

g/kg

0.10

240

4.3

6.9

0.39

0.92

1.6

Pyr

ene

M27

00m

g/kg

0.10

220

4.1

6.8

0.36

0.64

1.4

Ben

zo[a

]ant

hrac

ene

M27

00m

g/kg

0.10

942.

02.

8<

0.1

0<

0.1

0<

0.1

0C

hrys

ene

M27

00m

g/kg

0.10

100

2.3

3.4

< 0

.10

< 0

.10

< 0

.10

Ben

zo[b

]flu

oran

then

eM

2700

mg/

kg0.

1012

03.

34.

7<

0.1

0<

0.1

0<

0.1

0B

enzo

[k]f

luor

anth

ene

M27

00m

g/kg

0.10

481.

71.

8<

0.1

0<

0.1

0<

0.1

0

Pro

ject:

15-1

091.0

1 H

ew

ett

Sch

oo

l, N

orw

ich

Top

Dep

th (

m):

Ch

em

test

Jo

b N

o.:

Ch

em

test

Sam

ple

ID

.:

Clie

nt S

ampl

e R

ef.:

Clie

nt S

ampl

e ID

.:S

ampl

e T

ype:

Dat

e S

ampl

ed:

Pag

e 2

of 4

Resu

lts -

So

il

Cli

en

t: D

elt

a S

imo

ns

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

16-0

0490

Quo

tatio

n N

o.:

2389

6923

8970

2389

7123

8972

2389

7323

8974

2389

7523

8976

2389

77O

rder

No.

: 45

74D

S10

1D

S10

2D

S10

2D

S10

3D

S10

4D

S10

5D

S10

1D

S10

1D

S10

2E

S2

ES

1E

S2

ES

1E

S1

ES

2E

S3

D4

D4

SO

ILS

OIL

SO

ILS

OIL

SO

ILS

OIL

SO

ILS

OIL

SO

IL0.

300.

100.

300.

100.

100.

300.

501.

001.

0006

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

606

-Jan

-201

6D

ete

rmin

an

dA

cc

red

.S

OP

Un

its

LO

D

Pro

ject:

15-1

091.0

1 H

ew

ett

Sch

oo

l, N

orw

ich

Top

Dep

th (

m):

Ch

em

test

Jo

b N

o.:

Ch

em

test

Sam

ple

ID

.:

Clie

nt S

ampl

e R

ef.:

Clie

nt S

ampl

e ID

.:S

ampl

e T

ype:

Dat

e S

ampl

ed:

Ben

zo[a

]pyr

ene

M27

00m

g/kg

0.10

872.

53.

0<

0.1

0<

0.1

0<

0.1

0In

deno

(1,2

,3-c

,d)P

yren

eM

2700

mg/

kg0.

1058

1.3

2.1

< 0

.10

< 0

.10

< 0

.10

Dib

enz(

a,h)

Ant

hrac

ene

M27

00m

g/kg

0.10

150.

240.

52<

0.1

0<

0.1

0<

0.1

0B

enzo

[g,h

,i]pe

ryle

neM

2700

mg/

kg0.

1056

1.1

1.4

< 0

.10

< 0

.10

< 0

.10

Tot

al O

f 16

PA

H's

M27

00m

g/kg

2.0

1400

2737

< 2

.0<

2.0

3.0

Pag

e 3

of 4

Rep

ort

In

form

ati

on

Key U

UK

AS

acc

redi

ted

MM

CE

RT

S a

nd U

KA

S a

ccre

dite

dN

Una

ccre

dite

dS

Thi

s an

alys

is h

as b

een

subc

ontr

acte

d to

a U

KA

S a

ccre

dite

d la

bora

tory

that

is a

ccre

dite

d fo

r th

is a

naly

sis

SN

Thi

s an

alys

is h

as b

een

subc

ontr

acte

d to

a U

KA

S a

ccre

dite

d la

bora

tory

that

is n

ot a

ccre

dite

d fo

r th

is a

naly

sis

TT

his

anal

ysis

has

bee

n su

bcon

trac

ted

to a

n un

accr

edite

d la

bora

tory

I/SIn

suff

icie

nt S

ampl

eU

/SU

nsui

tabl

e S

ampl

eN

/E

not e

valu

ated

<"l

ess

than

">

"gre

ater

than

"

Com

men

ts o

r in

terp

reta

tions

are

bey

ond

the

scop

e of

UK

AS

acc

redi

tatio

nT

he r

esul

ts r

elat

e on

ly to

the

item

s te

sted

Unc

erta

inty

of

mea

sure

men

t for

the

dete

rmin

ands

test

ed a

re a

vaila

ble

upon

req

uest

N

one

of th

e re

sults

in th

is r

epor

t hav

e be

en r

ecov

ery

corr

ecte

dA

ll re

sults

are

exp

ress

ed o

n a

dry

wei

ght b

asis

The

fol

low

ing

test

s w

ere

anal

ysed

on

sam

ples

as

rece

ived

and

the

resu

lts s

ubse

quen

tly c

orre

cted

to a

dry

w

eigh

t bas

is T

PH

, BT

EX

, VO

Cs,

SV

OC

s, P

CB

s, P

heno

lsF

or a

ll ot

her

test

s th

e sa

mpl

es w

ere

drie

d at

< 3

7°C

pri

or to

ana

lysi

sA

ll A

sbes

tos

test

ing

is p

erfo

rmed

at o

ur C

oven

try

labo

rato

ry

Issu

e nu

mbe

rs a

re s

eque

ntia

l sta

rtin

g w

ith 1

all

subs

eque

nt r

epor

ts a

re in

crem

ente

d by

1

Sam

ple

Devia

tio

n C

od

es

A -

Dat

e of

sam

plin

g no

t sup

plie

dB

- S

ampl

e ag

e ex

ceed

s st

abili

ty ti

me

(sam

plin

g to

ext

ract

ion)

C -

Sam

ple

not r

ecei

ved

in a

ppro

pria

te c

onta

iner

sD

- B

roke

n C

onta

iner

Sam

ple

Rete

nti

on

an

d D

isp

osal

All

soil

sam

ples

will

be

reta

ined

for

a p

erio

d of

60

days

fro

m th

e da

te o

f re

ceip

tA

ll w

ater

sam

ples

will

be

reta

ined

for

14

days

fro

m th

e da

te o

f re

ceip

tC

harg

es m

ay a

pply

to e

xten

ded

sam

ple

stor

age

If y

ou r

equi

re e

xten

ded

rete

ntio

n of

sam

ples

, ple

ase

emai

l you

r re

quir

emen

ts to

: cu

stom

erse

rvic

es@

chem

test

.co.

uk

Pag

e 4

of 4

Ap

pe

nd

ix V

5–

7 H

exth

orpe

Roa

d, H

exth

orpe

,D

onca

ster

DN

4 0A

Rte

l: +4

4 (0

)844

815

664

1fa

x: +

44 (0

)844

815

664

2e-

mai

l: rg

unso

n@pr

osoi

ls.c

o.uk

aw

atki

ns@

pros

oils

.co.

uk

A c

opy

of th

e La

bora

tory

Sch

edul

e of

acc

redi

ted

test

s as i

ssue

d by

UK

AS

is a

ttach

ed to

this

repo

rt. T

his c

ertif

icat

e is

issu

ed in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

accr

edita

tion

requ

irem

ents

of th

e U

nite

d K

ingd

om A

ccre

dita

tion

Serv

ice.

The

resu

lts

repo

rted

here

in re

late

onl

y to

the

mat

eria

l sup

plie

d to

the

labo

rato

ry. T

his c

ertif

icat

e sh

all n

ot b

e re

prod

uced

in fu

ll,

with

out t

he p

rior w

ritte

n ap

prov

al o

f the

labo

rato

ry.

Che

cked

and

App

rove

d Si

gnat

orie

s:

R

Gun

son

A

Wat

kins

M B

east

all

(Dire

ctor

)

(Dire

ctor

)

(Lab

orat

ory

Man

ager

)

D L

ambe

S R

oyle

(

Seni

or T

echn

icia

n)(S

enio

r Tec

hnic

ian)

Page

1of

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

RE

PO

RT

4043

Con

trac

t Num

ber:

PSL

16/0

161

Rep

ort D

ate:

20

Janu

ary

2016

Clie

nt’s

Ref

eren

ce:

15-1

091.

01

Clie

nt N

ame:

Del

ta S

imon

s3

Hen

ley

Off

ice

Park

Dod

ding

ton

Roa

dLi

ncol

nLN

6 3Q

R

For

the

atte

ntio

n of

:M

alco

lm T

olle

y

Con

tract

Titl

e:

Hew

ett S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

Dat

e R

ecei

ved:

13/0

1/20

16

Dat

e C

omm

ence

d:

13/0

1/20

16

Dat

e C

ompl

eted

: 20

/01/

2016

Not

es:

Opi

nion

s an

d In

terp

reta

tions

are

out

side

the

UK

AS

Acc

redi

tatio

n*

Den

otes

test

not

incl

uded

in la

bora

tory

scop

e of

acc

redi

tatio

n$

Den

otes

test

car

ried

out

by

appr

oved

con

trac

tor

PS

L001

Issu

e 2

Nov

15

Pag

e

of

.

Hol

eSa

mpl

eSa

mpl

eT

opB

ase

Num

ber

Num

ber

Typ

eD

epth

Dep

th

mm

DS1

015

D1.

50B

row

n fin

e to

med

ium

SA

ND

.D

S101

7D

2.50

Bro

wn

grav

elly

ver

y sa

ndy

CL

AY

. San

d is

fine

to c

oars

e. G

rave

l is f

ine

to m

ediu

m su

b an

gula

r an

d su

b ro

unde

d -

chal

k an

d fli

nt.

DS1

025

D1.

50B

row

n sl

ight

ly g

rave

lly v

ery

sand

y C

LA

Y. S

and

is fi

ne to

coa

rse.

Gra

vel i

s fin

e to

med

ium

sub

angu

lar

and

sub

-ro

unde

d fli

nt.

DS1

027

D2.

50B

row

n ve

ry sa

ndy

CL

AY

. San

d is

fine

to m

ediu

m.

DS1

034

D1.

00B

row

n fin

e to

med

ium

SA

ND

.D

S103

7D

2.50

Bro

wn

slig

htly

gra

velly

sand

y C

LA

Y. S

and

is fi

ne to

coa

rse.

Gra

vel i

s fin

e to

med

ium

sub

angu

lar

and

sub

-ro

unde

d fli

nt.

DS1

041

B0.

501.

00B

row

n sl

ight

ly g

rave

lly v

ery

sand

y C

LA

Y. S

and

is fi

ne to

coa

rse.

Gra

vel i

s fin

e to

coa

rse

sub

angu

lar

and

sub

-ro

unde

d fli

nt.

DS1

045

D1.

50B

row

n ve

ry sa

ndy

CL

AY

. San

d is

fine

to m

ediu

m.

DS1

048

D3.

00B

row

n gr

avel

ly v

ery

sand

y C

LA

Y. S

and

is fi

ne to

coa

rse.

Gra

vel i

s fin

e to

med

ium

sub

angu

lar

and

sub

roun

ded

-ch

alk

and

flint

.D

S105

1B

0.50

1.00

Dar

k br

own

grav

elly

ver

y sa

ndy

CL

AY

. San

d is

fine

to c

oars

e. G

rave

l is f

ine

to c

oars

e su

b an

gula

r an

d su

b -

roun

ded

flint

.D

S105

4D

1.00

Bro

wn

slig

htly

gra

velly

ver

y sa

ndy

CL

AY

. San

d is

fine

to c

oars

e. G

rave

l is f

ine

to m

ediu

m su

b an

gula

r an

d su

b -

roun

ded

flint

.D

S105

6D

2.00

Bro

wn

grav

elly

ver

y sa

ndy

CL

AY

. San

d is

fine

to c

oars

e. G

rave

l is f

ine

to m

ediu

m su

b an

gula

r an

d su

b ro

unde

d -

flint

.

Che

cked

/ A

ppro

ved

Dat

e20

/01/

16C

ontr

act N

o:

PSL

16/0

161

Clie

nt R

ef:

4043

15-1

091.

01

Hew

ett S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

SUM

MA

RY

OF

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

SO

IL D

ESC

RIP

TIO

NS

Des

crip

tion

of S

ampl

e

PS

L001

Issu

e 2

Nov

15

Pag

e

of

.

Hol

eSa

mpl

eSa

mpl

eT

opB

ase

Num

ber

Num

ber

Typ

eD

epth

Dep

th

mm

DS1

058

D3.

00B

row

n sa

ndy

CL

AY

. San

d is

fine

to m

ediu

m.

DS1

071

B0.

501.

00B

row

n sl

ight

ly g

rave

lly v

ery

sand

y C

LA

Y. S

and

is fi

ne to

med

ium

. Gra

vel i

s fin

e to

coa

rse

sub

angu

lar

and

sub

-ro

unde

d fli

nt. C

heck

ed /

App

rove

dD

ate

20/0

1/16

Con

trac

t No:

PSL

16/0

161

Clie

nt R

ef:

4043

15-1

091.

01

SUM

MA

RY

OF

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

SO

IL D

ESC

RIP

TIO

NS

Des

crip

tion

of S

ampl

e

Hew

ett S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

PS

L002

Issu

e 2

Nov

15

Pag

e

of

.

(BS1

377

: PA

RT

2 :

1990

)

Moi

stur

eL

inea

r Pa

rtic

leL

iqui

dPl

astic

Plas

ticity

Pass

ing

Hol

eSa

mpl

eSa

mpl

e T

opB

ase

Con

tent

Shri

nkag

eD

ensi

tyL

imit

Lim

itIn

dex

.425

mm

Rem

arks

Num

ber

Num

ber

Typ

eD

epth

Dep

th%

%M

g/m

3%

%%

%m

mC

laus

e 3.

2C

laus

e 6.

5C

laus

e 8.

2C

laus

e 4.

3/4

Cla

use

5.3

Cla

use

5.4

DS1

015

D1.

5014

DS1

017

D2.

5014

DS1

025

D1.

5016

3518

1792

DS1

027

D2.

5018

DS1

034

D1.

0013

DS1

037

D2.

5023

DS1

045

D1.

5016

DS1

048

D3.

0016

DS1

054

D1.

0015

DS1

056

D2.

0010

DS1

058

D3.

0025

SYM

BO

LS

: N

P : N

on P

last

ic*

: Liq

uid

Lim

it an

d Pl

astic

Lim

it W

et S

ieve

d.

Dat

e20

/01/

16

4043

SUM

MA

RY

OF

SOIL

CL

ASS

IFIC

AT

ION

TE

STS

Inte

rmed

iate

pla

stic

ity C

I.

Clie

nt R

ef:

15-1

091.

01

Con

trac

t No:

PSL

16/0

161

Che

cked

/ A

ppro

ved H

ewet

t Sch

ool,

Nor

wic

h

PS

L002

Issu

e 2

Nov

15

Pag

e

of

.

(BS5

930

:201

5)

Dat

e20

/01/

16

4043

15-1

091.

01

Hew

ett S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

Che

cked

/App

rove

dC

ontr

act N

o:

PSL

16/0

161

Clie

nt R

ef:

PLA

STIC

ITY

CH

AR

T F

OR

CA

SAG

RA

ND

E C

LA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N.

0102030405060708090

010

2030

4050

6070

8090

100

110

120

130

Plasticity Index (PI%).

Liqu

id L

imit

(LL%

).

CL

CI

CH

CV

CE

ML

MI

MH

MV

ME

PS

LR02

4

I

ssue

2N

ov 1

5P

age

of

.

Hol

e N

umbe

r:D

S104

Top

Dep

th (m

):0.

50

Sam

ple

Num

ber:

1B

ase

Dep

th (m

):1.

00

Sam

ple

Typ

e:B

Moi

stur

e C

onte

nt:

15Su

rcha

rge

Kg:

4.20

Sam

ple

Top

16Sa

mpl

e To

p4.

3B

ulk

Den

sity

Mg/

m3:

2.13

Soak

ing

Tim

e hr

s0

Sam

ple

Bot

tom

14Sa

mpl

e B

otto

m6.

2D

ry D

ensi

ty M

g/m

3:1.

85Sw

ellin

g m

m:

0 1

Dat

e20

/01/

16C

ontr

act N

o:PS

L15

/016

1C

lient

Ref

:15

-109

1.01

Perc

enta

ge re

tain

ed o

n 20

mm

BS

test

siev

e:

Initi

al S

ampl

e C

ondi

tions

Sam

ple

Prep

arat

ion

Com

pact

ion

Con

ditio

ns2.

5kg

Ram

mer

Rem

arks

: See

sum

mar

y of

soil

desc

riptio

ns.

Che

cked

/ A

ppro

ved

Hew

ett S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

BE

AR

ING

RA

TIO

TE

ST B

S 13

77 :

Part

4 :

1990

4043

C.B

.R. V

alue

%Fi

nal M

oist

ure

Con

tent

%

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.81

1.2

1.4

1.6

01

23

45

67

8

Force on plunger (kN)

Pene

tratio

n of

Plu

nger

(mm

)

Top

Bot

tom

PS

LR02

4

I

ssue

2N

ov 1

5P

age

of

.

Hol

e N

umbe

r:D

S105

Top

Dep

th (m

):0.

50

Sam

ple

Num

ber:

1B

ase

Dep

th (m

):1.

00

Sam

ple

Typ

e:B

Moi

stur

e C

onte

nt:

15Su

rcha

rge

Kg:

4.20

Sam

ple

Top

15Sa

mpl

e To

p0.

7B

ulk

Den

sity

Mg/

m3:

2.13

Soak

ing

Tim

e hr

s0

Sam

ple

Bot

tom

15Sa

mpl

e B

otto

m0.

7D

ry D

ensi

ty M

g/m

3:1.

85Sw

ellin

g m

m:

0 3

Dat

e20

/01/

16C

ontr

act N

o:PS

L15

/016

1C

lient

Ref

:15

-109

1.01

Perc

enta

ge re

tain

ed o

n 20

mm

BS

test

siev

e:

Initi

al S

ampl

e C

ondi

tions

Sam

ple

Prep

arat

ion

Com

pact

ion

Con

ditio

ns2.

5kg

Ram

mer

Rem

arks

: See

sum

mar

y of

soil

desc

riptio

ns.

Che

cked

/ A

ppro

ved

Hew

ett S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

BE

AR

ING

RA

TIO

TE

ST B

S 13

77 :

Part

4 :

1990

4043

C.B

.R. V

alue

%Fi

nal M

oist

ure

Con

tent

%

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.080.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

01

23

45

67

8


Pene

tratio

n of

Plu

nger

(mm

)

Top

Bot

tom

PS

LR02

4

I

ssue

2N

ov 1

5P

age

of

.

Hol

e N

umbe

r:D

S107

Top

Dep

th (m

):0.

50

Sam

ple

Num

ber:

1B

ase

Dep

th (m

):1.

00

Sam

ple

Typ

e:B

Moi

stur

e C

onte

nt:

15Su

rcha

rge

Kg:

4.20

Sam

ple

Top

14Sa

mpl

e To

p1.

2B

ulk

Den

sity

Mg/

m3:

2.15

Soak

ing

Tim

e hr

s0

Sam

ple

Bot

tom

15Sa

mpl

e B

otto

m1.

0D

ry D

ensi

ty M

g/m

3:1.

88Sw

ellin

g m

m:

0 3

Dat

e20

/01/

16C

ontr

act N

o:PS

L15

/016

1C

lient

Ref

:15

-109

1.01

Perc

enta

ge re

tain

ed o

n 20

mm

BS

test

siev

e:

Initi

al S

ampl

e C

ondi

tions

Sam

ple

Prep

arat

ion

Com

pact

ion

Con

ditio

ns2.

5kg

Ram

mer

Rem

arks

: See

sum

mar

y of

soil

desc

riptio

ns.

Che

cked

/ A

ppro

ved

Hew

ett S

choo

l, N

orw

ich

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

BE

AR

ING

RA

TIO

TE

ST B

S 13

77 :

Part

4 :

1990

4043

C.B

.R. V

alue

%Fi

nal M

oist

ure

Con

tent

%

0

0.050.1

0.150.2

0.250.3

0.35

01

23

45

67

8


Pene

tratio

n of

Plu

nger

(mm

)

Top

Bot

tom

Ap

pen

dix

VI

De

lta

-Sim

on

s A

do

pte

d H

um

an

He

alt

h G

en

eri

c A

ss

es

sm

en

t C

rite

ria

Fo

r

Re

sid

en

tia

l E

nd

Use

wit

h C

on

su

mp

tio

n o

f H

om

e G

row

n P

rod

uce

Ve

rsio

n 4

.2 –

Se

pte

mb

er

201

5

Col

latio

n of

Hum

an H

ealth

SG

Vs

an

d S

oil

Scr

ee

nin

g V

alu

es –

Re

sid

en

tial w

ith c

ons

ump

tion

of

hom

e g

row

n p

rod

uce

_

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

__

___

____

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

_

Do

cu

men

t N

o:

D117

Vers

ion

:4.1

Is

su

e D

ate

: 28

/01/

15

Au

tho

r: J

Rho

ades

A

uth

ori

sed

by:

R G

riffit

hs

Pag

e:

2 of

11

© D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

iron

me

ntal

Co

nsul

tant

s Li

mite

d.

No

par

t of

this

do

cum

ent

ma

y be

re

prod

uce

d u

nles

s p

rior

writ

ten

pe

rmis

sion

ha

s b

een

gra

nte

d.

Gu

ida

nc

e N

ote

s –

Usin

g H

um

an

He

alt

h S

oil

Sc

ree

nin

g V

alu

es

A

tie

red

risk

asse

ssm

ent

appr

oac

h is

us

ed

for

the

a

sse

ssm

ent

of

soil

ana

lysi

s re

sults

co

nsid

erin

g th

e ‘p

ollu

tant

link

ages

’ on

the

basi

s of

a ‘s

ourc

e-p

ath

wa

y-re

cept

or’ r

elat

ions

hip.

The

fol

low

ing

tab

les

pres

ent

cons

erva

tive

Tie

r 1

gene

ric

scre

enin

g as

sess

men

t cr

iteria

(G

AC

) us

ed b

y D

elta

-Sim

ons

to p

rovi

de a

n in

itia

l ass

ess

men

t of

ris

k to

Hum

an H

ealth

in t

he c

onte

xt

of th

e pr

opos

ed r

ede

velo

pm

ent o

f th

e S

ite.

G

AC

s a

re in

ten

ded

to

ass

ess:

∆ C

hron

ic (

lon

g-t

erm

) on

-site

exp

osur

e ris

k to

con

tam

ina

nts

in th

e s

oil t

o fu

ture

use

rs a

nd

occu

pier

s of

the

Site

.

∆ C

once

ntra

tions

be

low

the

GA

C c

onsi

dere

d to

lera

ble

or to

pos

e a

min

imal

ris

k to

hu

man

he

alth

, or

low

ris

k in

rel

atio

n to

th

e C

ate

gory

4 S

cree

nin

g L

evel

s (C

4S

Ls).

G

AC

s a

re n

ot

rele

van

t fo

r ass

essin

g:

∆ A

cute

(sh

ort-

term

) ex

posu

re r

isks

(e.

g. c

onst

ruct

ion

wor

kers

dur

ing

deve

lopm

ent)

; ∆

Non

-hum

an r

ecep

tors

suc

h as

con

tro

lled

wa

ters

, ec

osys

tem

s, b

uild

ings

and

ser

vice

s,

anim

als,

dom

estic

pet

s or

pla

nts;

∆

Aes

the

tic is

sues

whi

ch m

ay

rend

er a

soi

l uns

uita

ble

for

use

suc

h as

odo

ur o

r co

lour

;

∆ G

AC

s do

not

tak

e ac

coun

t of

oth

er n

on-s

oil b

ase

d so

urce

s of

con

tam

inat

ion

such

as

cont

amin

atio

n in

gro

und

wat

er o

r su

rfac

e w

ate

rs; a

nd

∆

GA

Cs

are

not s

uita

ble

for

ass

essi

ng w

heth

er a

soi

l pro

vide

s a

suita

ble

gro

win

g m

ediu

m

for

crop

s or

pla

nts.

E

xc

eed

en

ce

s o

f G

en

eri

c A

sse

ssm

en

t C

rite

ria

An

exce

ede

nce

of a

GA

C:

∆ Is

not

an

ind

icat

or o

f a

sign

ifica

nt r

isk

to h

uman

hea

lth;

∆ Is

an

ind

icat

ion

that

the

con

tam

inan

t may

pos

e a

poss

ibili

ty h

arm

to h

uman

hea

lth a

nd,

ther

efor

e, f

urth

er c

onsi

dera

tion

is r

equi

red.

In

ass

essi

ng t

he s

ign

ifica

nce

of a

n ex

cee

denc

e c

onsi

der

atio

n sh

oul

d be

giv

en

to:

∆ T

he n

atur

e of

the

cont

amin

ant (

e.g.

vol

atile

or

non-

vola

tile

con

tam

inan

ts)

∆ S

ite d

esig

n an

d po

tent

ial e

xpos

ure

path

way

s (e

.g. h

ard

cove

r, b

uild

ings

, lan

dsca

pin

g)

∆ T

he

dist

ribut

ion

of

ex

ceed

ence

s (w

ides

prea

d

or

loca

lise

d,

num

erou

s or

fe

w

exc

eed

ence

s –

NB

: Con

side

r dat

a lim

itatio

ns –

site

cov

erag

e an

d ga

ps in

dat

a.

∆ T

he m

argi

n of

the

exce

ede

nce(

s);

∆ T

he d

urat

ion

and

freq

uen

cy o

f ex

posu

re; a

nd

∆ A

ny

othe

r si

te s

peci

fic f

acto

rs.

Gen

eri

c A

ss

ess

men

t C

rite

ria u

sed

by D

elt

a-S

imo

ns

In t

he

abs

ence

of

a co

mpl

ete

reg

ula

tory

se

t of

scr

eeni

ng v

alu

es d

eriv

ed

usin

g th

e C

LE

A

Fra

mew

ork,

Del

ta-S

imon

s sc

reen

ing

val

ues

are

bas

ed o

n th

e fo

llow

ing:

T

he c

urre

nt S

oil

Gui

dan

ce V

alue

s (S

GV

s) p

ublis

hed

by

the

EA

;

C

ateg

ory

4 S

cre

enin

g Le

vels

(C

4SLs

) pu

blis

hed

by

DE

FR

A;

T

he 2

014

Lan

d Q

ual

ity M

anag

emen

t (L

QM

) /

Cha

rter

ed I

nstit

ute

of E

nvi

ronm

enta

l H

ealth

(C

IEH

) S

uita

ble

for

Use

Le

vels

fo

r H

uman

Hea

lth R

isk

Ass

essm

ent

(S4U

Ls)

;

T

he g

uida

nce

val

ues

pro

duce

d b

y th

e E

nvi

ronm

enta

l In

dust

ries

Com

mis

sion

(E

IC),

the

A

ssoc

iatio

n

of

Geo

tech

nica

l a

nd

Geo

en

viro

nmen

tal

Sp

ecia

lists

(A

GS

) an

d C

onta

min

ated

Lan

d: A

pplic

atio

n in

Rea

l En

viro

nmen

ts (

CL:

AIR

E)

in D

ecem

ber

2009

; an

d

In

ho

use

Gen

eric

Scr

een

ing

Va

lues

(D

S-G

AC

s) d

eriv

ed

by

De

lta-S

imon

s.

Co

nta

min

an

ts f

or

wh

ich

Ge

ne

ric

As

se

ss

me

nt

Cri

teri

a a

re U

na

va

ila

ble

In

suff

icie

nt to

xico

logi

cal d

ata

is a

vaila

ble

to d

eriv

e G

AC

for

a nu

mbe

r of

pot

ent

ial c

onta

min

ants

of

con

cern

and

GA

C c

anno

t be

der

ived

for

der

ived

for

mix

ture

s of

com

poun

ds (

e.g.

to

tal

petr

oleu

m h

ydro

carb

ons)

. In

suc

h ca

ses

De

lta-S

imon

s w

ill e

ndea

vour

to

use

con

serv

ativ

e

Col

latio

n of

Hum

an

Hea

lth S

GV

s an

d S

oil S

cre

enin

g V

alue

s –

Re

sid

en

tial w

ith c

ons

ump

tion

of

hom

e g

row

n p

rod

uce

_

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

__

___

____

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

_

Do

cu

men

t N

o:

D117

Vers

ion

:4.1

Is

su

e D

ate

: 28

/01/

15

Au

tho

r: J

Rho

ades

A

uth

ori

sed

by:

R G

riffit

hs

Pag

e:

3 of

11

© D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

iron

me

ntal

Co

nsul

tant

s Li

mite

d.

No

par

t of

this

do

cum

ent

ma

y be

re

prod

uce

d u

nles

s p

rior

writ

ten

pe

rmis

sion

ha

s b

een

gra

nte

d.

surr

ogat

e G

AC

val

ues

to p

rovi

de a

n in

itia

l scr

een

ing

asse

ssm

ent b

ased

on

the

kno

wn

chem

ical

an

d ph

ysic

al p

rop

ertie

s of

the

cont

amin

ant.

No

tes a

nd

Refe

ren

ces

us

ed

in

th

e T

ab

les

Gen

eri

c A

ss

ess

men

t C

rite

ria S

ou

rce

SG

V

Soi

l Gu

idan

ce V

alue

s p

ublis

hed

by

the

EA

DS

-GA

C

Del

ta-S

imon

s G

ener

ic A

sses

smen

t Crit

eria

der

ived

usi

ng C

LEA

V.1

.06.

C4S

L

Cat

egor

y 4

Scr

een

ing

Leve

ls, D

EF

RA

Dec

embe

r 20

14

SG

V

v.1.

05

En

viro

nmen

t Age

ncy

So

il G

uid

elin

e V

alu

es f

or d

ioxi

ns,

fura

ns a

nd d

ioxi

n-l

ike

PC

Bs

calc

ulat

ed w

ithin

CL

EA

V.1

.05

.

LQM

LQM

/CIE

H S

uita

ble

for

Use

Le

vels

for

Hum

an H

ealth

Ris

k A

sses

smen

t (S

4UL)

, Nov

embe

r 20

14.

(Cop

yrig

ht L

and

Qu

ality

Ma

nage

me

nt L

imite

d, r

educ

ed w

ith p

erm

issi

on;

Pub

licat

ion

Nu

mb

er S

4U

L308

7. A

ll ri

ghts

res

erve

d).

EIC

E

IC/A

GS

/CL:

AIR

E S

oil G

ene

ric A

sses

smen

t Crit

eria

for

Hum

an H

ealth

Ris

k A

sses

smen

t der

ived

usi

ng

CLE

A V

.1.0

6.

Ab

bre

via

tio

ns

Uni

ts

All

valu

es m

g/kg

unl

ess

oth

erw

ise

stat

ed.

SO

M

Soi

l Org

ani

c M

atte

r –

GA

C h

ave

bee

n de

rive

d fo

r a

ran

ge o

f so

il or

gan

ic

mat

ter

cont

ent –

1%

, 2.5

or

3% a

nd

6%.

In th

e ab

senc

e of

site

sp

ecifi

c da

ta o

r ro

bust

soi

l cha

ract

eris

atio

n th

e m

ost

cons

erva

tive

valu

e of

1%

soi

l org

ani

c m

atte

r sh

ould

be

used

as

the

initi

al

scre

enin

g v

alu

e.

(##)

GA

C

exce

ed

satu

ratio

n/v

apou

r co

nce

ntra

tion

(g

ive

n in

br

acke

ts).

Soi

l co

ncen

trat

ions

ab

ove

the

soil

satu

ratio

n m

ay

ind

icat

e th

at n

on

-aqu

eous

ph

ase

liqui

d (N

AP

L) i

s pr

esen

t.

Ris

ks f

rom

NA

PL

ma

y n

eed

to b

e c

onsi

dere

d

sepa

rate

ly.

Ref

eren

ce

shou

ld

alw

ays

be

m

ade

to

the

site

in

vest

igat

ion

obse

rva

tions

an

d so

il lo

gs w

ere

ava

ilabl

e.

ND

Not

der

ived

. I

t w

as c

onsi

der

ed b

eyo

nd t

he s

cope

of

the

EIC

pro

ject

to

colla

te

and

revi

ew

pla

nt c

onc

entr

atio

n fa

ctor

s fo

r th

e m

etal

s a

nd th

eref

ore

GA

C h

ave

on

ly b

een

pro

duce

d fo

r la

nd

-use

s th

at

do

not

invo

lve

pla

nt u

ptak

e. G

AC

hav

e be

en c

alc

ulat

ed f

or a

ntim

ony,

bar

ium

and

mol

ybd

enu

m f

or t

he r

esid

entia

l w

ithou

t pl

an

t upt

ake

scen

ario

. U

se o

f C

4S

Ls a

s S

cre

en

ing

Cri

teri

a

Onl

y th

e l

ead

C4

SL

shou

ld b

e us

ed a

s an

in

itial

scr

eeni

ng

leve

l, as

ther

e is

no

‘min

imal

ris

k’

scre

enin

g v

alu

e a

vaila

ble

. T

houg

h pr

imar

ily d

esig

ned

for

asse

ssin

g th

e ris

k of

lan

d be

ing

de

term

ined

as

‘con

tam

inat

ed’ u

nder

Par

t 2A,

Def

ra h

ave

con

firm

ed1

that

the

C4

SL

coul

d b

e us

ed u

nder

the

pla

nni

ng r

egi

me.

Whe

re a

pplic

able

, the

‘min

imal

risk

’ lev

el s

houl

d be

use

d as

th

e in

itial

scr

eeni

ng le

vel a

nd

wh

ere

exce

eda

nces

are

iden

tifie

d r

efer

ence

to, a

nd c

onsi

der

atio

n of

the

C4

SL

leve

ls m

ay

be

mad

e in

the

ris

k as

sess

men

t pro

cess

.

1 D

efra

/Lor

d d

e M

aule

y le

tter

to a

ll L

ocal

Au

thor

ities

dat

ed 3

rd S

ept

embe

r 20

14.

Col

latio

n of

Hum

an H

ealth

SG

Vs

an

d S

oil

Scr

ee

nin

g V

alu

es –

Re

sid

en

tial w

ith c

ons

ump

tion

of

hom

e g

row

n p

rod

uce

_

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

__

___

____

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

_

Do

cu

men

t N

o:

D117

Vers

ion

:4.1

Is

su

e D

ate

: 28

/01/

15

Au

tho

r: J

Rho

ades

A

uth

ori

sed

by:

R G

riffit

hs

Pag

e:

4 of

11

© D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

iron

me

ntal

Co

nsul

tant

s Li

mite

d.

No

par

t of

this

do

cum

ent

ma

y be

re

prod

uce

d u

nles

s p

rior

writ

ten

pe

rmis

sion

ha

s b

een

gra

nte

d.

M

eta

ls

Co

mp

ou

nd

1

% S

OM

S

ou

rce

2.5

- 3

%

SO

M

So

urc

e

6%

SO

M

So

urc

e

Ant

imo

ny

ND

-

ND

-

ND

-

Ars

enic

3

2 S

GV

3

2 S

GV

3

2 S

GV

Ars

enic

3

7 LQ

M

37

LQM

3

7 LQ

M

Ars

enic

3

7 C

4SL

37

C4S

L 3

7 C

4SL

Bar

ium

N

D

- N

D

- N

D

-

Be

rylli

um

1.7

LQM

1.

7 LQ

M

1.7

LQM

Bor

on

29

0 LQ

M

29

0 LQ

M

29

0 LQ

M

Cad

miu

m

10

SG

V

10

SG

V

10

SG

V

Cad

miu

m

11

LQM

1

1 LQ

M

11

LQM

Cad

miu

m

22

C4S

L 2

2 C

4SL

22

C4S

L

Chr

omiu

m (

III)

91

0 LQ

M

91

0 LQ

M

91

0 LQ

M

Chr

omiu

m (

VI)

6

LQ

M

6

LQM

6

LQ

M

Chr

omiu

m (

VI)

2

1 C

4SL

21

C4S

L 2

1 C

4SL

Cop

per

24

00

LQM

2

40

0 LQ

M

24

00

LQM

Le

ad

20

0 C

4SL

20

0 C

4SL

20

0 C

4SL

Me

rcu

ry

(ele

me

nta

l) 0

.17

DS

-GA

C

0.5

DS

-GA

C

1.0

SG

V

Me

rcu

ry

(ele

me

nta

l) -

- -

- 1.

2 LQ

M

Me

rcu

ry

(in

org

an

ic)

17

0 D

S-G

AC

1

70

DS

-GA

C

17

0 S

GV

Me

rcu

ry

(in

org

an

ic)

40

LQM

4

0 LQ

M

40

LQM

Me

rcu

ry

(me

thyl

) 7.

4 D

S-G

AC

1

0 D

S-G

AC

1

1 S

GV

Me

rcu

ry

(me

thyl

) -

- -

- 1

1 LQ

M

Mo

lyb

de

nu

m

ND

-

ND

-

ND

-

Nic

kel

13

0 LQ

M

13

0 LQ

M

13

0 LQ

M

Sel

eniu

m

35

0 S

GV

3

50

SG

V

35

0 S

GV

Sel

eniu

m

25

0 LQ

M

25

0 LQ

M

25

0 LQ

M

Van

adiu

m

41

0 LQ

M

41

0 LQ

M

41

0 LQ

M

Zin

c 3

70

0 LQ

M

37

00

LQM

3

70

0 LQ

M

ND

- G

AC

not

der

ived

. It

was

con

side

red

beyo

nd th

e sc

ope

of th

e E

IC p

roje

ct to

col

late

and

rev

iew

pla

nt c

once

ntra

tion

fact

ors

for

the

met

als

and

ther

efor

e G

AC

hav

e on

ly b

een

prod

uced

for

land

-use

s th

at d

o no

t inv

olve

pla

nt u

ptak

e. G

AC

ha

ve b

een

calc

ulat

ed fo

r an

timon

y, b

ariu

m a

nd m

olyd

enum

for

the

resi

dent

ial w

ithou

t pl

ant

upta

ke s

cena

rio.

Ital

ics–

The

se v

alue

s w

ere

deriv

ed b

ased

on

a 6%

SO

M,

how

ever

, th

e su

ppor

ting

docu

men

tatio

n in

dica

tes

that

SO

M

has

a ne

glig

ible

influ

ence

for

thes

e m

etal

s.

Col

latio

n of

Hum

an

Hea

lth S

GV

s an

d S

oil S

cre

enin

g V

alue

s –

Re

sid

en

tial w

ith c

ons

ump

tion

of

hom

e g

row

n p

rod

uce

_

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

__

___

____

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

_

Do

cu

men

t N

o:

D117

Vers

ion

:4.1

Is

su

e D

ate

: 28

/01/

15

Au

tho

r: J

Rho

ades

A

uth

ori

sed

by:

R G

riffit

hs

Pag

e:

5 of

11

© D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

iron

me

ntal

Co

nsul

tant

s Li

mite

d.

No

par

t of

this

do

cum

ent

ma

y be

re

prod

uce

d u

nles

s p

rior

writ

ten

pe

rmis

sion

ha

s b

een

gra

nte

d.

Petr

ole

um

Hyd

roc

arb

on

s

Co

mp

ou

nd

1

% S

OM

S

ou

rce

2.5

- 3

%

SO

M

So

urc

e

6%

SO

M

So

urc

e

Alip

hatic

EC

5-E

C6

42

LQM

7

8 LQ

M

16

0 LQ

M

Alip

hat

ic >

EC

6-E

C8

10

0 LQ

M

23

0 LQ

M

53

0 LQ

M

Alip

hat

ic >

EC

8-E

C10

2

7 LQ

M

65

LQM

1

50

LQM

Alip

hat

ic >

EC

10

-EC

12

13

0

(48

) LQ

M

33

0

(11

8)

LQM

7

60

(2

83

) LQ

M

Alip

hat

ic >

EC

12

-EC

16

11

00

(24

) LQ

M

24

00

(5

9)

LQM

4

30

0

(14

2)

LQM

Alip

hat

ic >

EC

16

-EC

35

65

00

0 (8

.48

) LQ

M

92

00

0

(21

) LQ

M

11

00

00

LQM

Alip

hat

ic >

EC

35

-EC

44

65

00

0 (8

.48

) LQ

M

92

00

0

(21

) LQ

M

11

00

00

LQM

Aro

ma

tic >

EC

5-E

C7

70

LQM

1

40

LQM

3

00

LQM

Aro

ma

tic >

EC

7-E

C8

13

0 LQ

M

29

0 LQ

M

66

0 LQ

M

Aro

ma

tic >

EC

8-E

C10

3

4 LQ

M

83

LQM

1

90

LQM

Aro

ma

tic >

EC

10

-EC

12

74

LQM

1

80

LQM

3

80

LQM

Aro

ma

tic >

EC

12

-EC

16

14

0 LQ

M

33

0 LQ

M

66

0 LQ

M

Aro

ma

tic >

EC

16

-EC

21

26

0 LQ

M

54

0 LQ

M

93

0 LQ

M

Aro

ma

tic >

EC

21

-EC

35

11

00

LQM

1

50

0 LQ

M

17

00

LQM

Aro

ma

tic >

EC

35

-EC

44

11

00

LQM

1

50

0 LQ

M

17

00

LQM

Aro

ma

tic a

nd

Alip

hatic

>

EC

44-E

C70

1

60

0 LQ

M

18

00

LQM

1

90

0 LQ

M

Col

latio

n of

Hum

an H

ealth

SG

Vs

an

d S

oil

Scr

ee

nin

g V

alu

es –

Re

sid

en

tial w

ith c

ons

ump

tion

of

hom

e g

row

n p

rod

uce

_

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

__

___

____

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

_

Do

cu

men

t N

o:

D117

Vers

ion

:4.1

Is

su

e D

ate

: 28

/01/

15

Au

tho

r: J

Rho

ades

A

uth

ori

sed

by:

R G

riffit

hs

Pag

e:

6 of

11

© D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

iron

me

ntal

Co

nsul

tant

s Li

mite

d.

No

par

t of

this

do

cum

ent

ma

y be

re

prod

uce

d u

nles

s p

rior

writ

ten

pe

rmis

sion

ha

s b

een

gra

nte

d.

Po

lyc

ycli

c A

rom

ati

c H

yd

roc

arb

on

s (

PA

H)

Co

mp

ou

nd

1

% S

OM

S

ou

rce

2.5

- 3

%

SO

M

So

urc

e

6%

SO

M

So

urc

e

Na

ph

thal

ene

2.

3 LQ

M

5.6

LQM

1

3 LQ

M

Ace

naph

thyl

ene

17

0 LQ

M

42

0 LQ

M

92

0 LQ

M

Ace

nap

hth

en

e 2

10

LQM

5

10

LQM

1

10

0 LQ

M

Flu

oren

e 1

70

LQM

4

00

LQM

8

60

LQM

Ph

en

ant

hre

ne

95

LQM

2

20

LQM

4

40

LQM

Ant

hrac

ene

2

40

0 LQ

M

54

00

LQM

1

10

00

LQM

Flu

ora

nth

ene

28

0 LQ

M

56

0 LQ

M

89

0 LQ

M

Pyr

ene

6

20

LQM

1

20

0 LQ

M

20

00

LQM

Be

nzo

[a]a

nth

race

ne

7.2

LQM

1

1 LQ

M

13

LQM

Chr

ysen

e 1

5 LQ

M

22

LQM

2

7 LQ

M

Be

nzo

[b]f

luo

ran

then

e

2.6

LQM

3.

3 LQ

M

3.7

LQM

Ben

zo[k

]fluo

ran

the

ne

77

LQM

9

3 LQ

M

10

0 LQ

M

Be

nzo

[a]p

yre

ne

2.2

LQM

2.

7 LQ

M

3

LQM

Be

nzo

[a]p

yre

ne

5.0

C4S

L 5.

0 C

4SL

5.0

C4S

L

Ind

eno

[123

-cd]

pyr

en

e

27

LQM

3

6 LQ

M

41

LQM

Dib

en

z[a

h]a

nth

race

ne

0

.24

LQM

0

.28

LQM

0.

3 LQ

M

Be

nzo

[gh

i]pe

ryle

ne

3

20

LQM

3

40

LQM

3

50

LQM

C4S

L fo

r be

nzo(

a)py

rene

is b

ased

on

6% S

OM

onl

y, h

owev

er, t

he p

ublis

hed

C4S

L F

inal

Pro

ject

Rep

ort

indi

cate

s th

at

SO

M h

as a

neg

ligib

le in

fluen

ce fo

r th

is c

ompo

und.

Col

latio

n of

Hum

an

Hea

lth S

GV

s an

d S

oil S

cre

enin

g V

alue

s –

Re

sid

en

tial w

ith c

ons

ump

tion

of

hom

e g

row

n p

rod

uce

_

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

__

___

____

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

_

Do

cu

men

t N

o:

D117

Vers

ion

:4.1

Is

su

e D

ate

: 28

/01/

15

Au

tho

r: J

Rho

ades

A

uth

ori

sed

by:

R G

riffit

hs

Pag

e:

7 of

11

© D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

iron

me

ntal

Co

nsul

tant

s Li

mite

d.

No

par

t of

this

do

cum

ent

ma

y be

re

prod

uce

d u

nles

s p

rior

writ

ten

pe

rmis

sion

ha

s b

een

gra

nte

d.

Vo

lati

le O

rga

nic

Co

mp

ou

nd

s (

VO

C)

Co

mp

ou

nd

1

% S

OM

S

ou

rce

2.5

- 3

%

SO

M

So

urc

e

6%

SO

M

So

urc

e

BT

EX

/MT

BE

Be

nze

ne

0.3

3 S

GV

Be

nze

ne

0.0

87

LQM

0

.17

LQM

0

.37

LQM

Be

nze

ne

0.2

C4S

L -

- 0

.87

C4S

L

To

lue

ne

61

0 S

GV

To

lue

ne

13

0 LQ

M

29

0 LQ

M

66

0 LQ

M

Eth

ylb

en

zen

e

35

0 S

GV

Eth

ylb

en

zen

e

47

LQM

1

10

LQM

2

60

LQM

Xyl

en

e –

m

24

0 S

GV

Xyl

en

e –

m

59

LQM

1

40

LQM

3

20

LQM

Xyl

en

e –

o

25

0 S

GV

Xyl

en

e –

o

60

LQM

1

40

LQM

3

30

LQM

Xyl

en

e –

p

23

0 S

GV

Xyl

en

e –

p

56

LQM

1

30

LQM

3

10

LQM

Me

thyl

ter

t-bu

tyl e

the

r 4

9 E

IC

84

EIC

1

60

EIC

Ch

lori

na

ted

So

lve

nts

Vin

yl C

hlo

ride

(C

hlo

roet

he

ne)

0.0

006

4 LQ

M

0.0

008

7 LQ

M

0.0

014

LQ

M

Tric

hlo

rom

eth

an

e (C

hlo

rofo

rm)

0.9

1 LQ

M

1.7

LQM

3.

4 LQ

M

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

tha

ne

0.0

071

LQ

M

0.0

11

LQM

0

.01

9 LQ

M

Tric

hlo

roe

then

e (

TC

E)

0.0

16

LQM

0

.03

4 LQ

M

0.0

75

LQM

1,1

,1-T

rich

loro

eth

ane

8.8

LQM

1

8 LQ

M

39

LQM

Te

tra

chlo

roe

the

ne

(P

CE

) 0

.18

LQM

0

.39

LQM

0.

9 LQ

M

1,1

,1,2

-T

etr

ach

loro

eth

an

e

1.2

LQM

2.

8 LQ

M

6.4

LQM

1,1

,2,2

-T

etr

ach

loro

eth

an

e

1.6

LQM

3.

4 LQ

M

7.5

LQM

Te

tra

chlo

rom

eth

ane

0

.02

6 LQ

M

0.0

56

LQM

0

.13

LQM

1,1

,2 T

rich

loro

eth

an

e

0.6

EIC

1.

2 E

IC

2.7

EIC

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

tha

ne

2.4

EIC

3.

9 E

IC

7.4

EIC

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

the

ne

0.2

3 E

IC

0.4

EIC

0

.82

EIC

Cis

1,2

-Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

0.1

1 E

IC

0.1

9 E

IC

0.3

7 E

IC

Tra

ns

1,2

-d

ichl

oro

eth

ene

0.1

9 E

IC

0.3

4 E

IC

0.7

EIC

Be

nze

ne

s

Ch

loro

ben

zen

e 0

.46

LQM

1

LQ

M

2.4

LQM

1,2

,4-T

rime

thyl

ben

zen

e

0.3

5 E

IC

0.8

5 E

IC

2.0

EIC

Iso

-pro

pyl

ben

zen

e

11

EIC

2

7 E

IC

64

EIC

Pro

pyl

be

nze

ne

34

EIC

8

2 E

IC

19

0 E

IC

Oth

er

Bro

mo

ben

zen

e 0

.87

EIC

2.

0 E

IC

4.7

EIC

Bro

mo

dich

loro

me

tha

ne

0.0

16

EIC

0

.03

EIC

0

.06

1 E

IC

Car

bon

Dis

ulph

ide

0.1

4 LQ

M

0.2

9 LQ

M

0.6

2 LQ

M

Ch

loro

eth

ane

8.

3 E

IC

11

EIC

1

8 E

IC

Chl

orom

etha

ne

0.0

083

E

IC

0.0

098

E

IC

0.0

13

EIC

Col

latio

n of

Hum

an H

ealth

SG

Vs

an

d S

oil

Scr

ee

nin

g V

alu

es –

Re

sid

en

tial w

ith c

ons

ump

tion

of

hom

e g

row

n p

rod

uce

_

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

__

___

____

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

_

Do

cu

men

t N

o:

D117

Vers

ion

:4.1

Is

su

e D

ate

: 28

/01/

15

Au

tho

r: J

Rho

ades

A

uth

ori

sed

by:

R G

riffit

hs

Pag

e:

8 of

11

© D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

iron

me

ntal

Co

nsul

tant

s Li

mite

d.

No

par

t of

this

do

cum

ent

ma

y be

re

prod

uce

d u

nles

s p

rior

writ

ten

pe

rmis

sion

ha

s b

een

gra

nte

d.

Co

mp

ou

nd

1

% S

OM

S

ou

rce

2.5

- 3

%

SO

M

So

urc

e

6%

SO

M

So

urc

e

Dic

hlo

rom

eth

ane

0.5

8 E

IC

0.9

8 E

IC

1.7

EIC

1,2-

Dic

hlor

opro

pane

0

.02

4 E

IC

0.0

42

EIC

0

.08

4 E

IC

He

xach

loro

bu

tad

ien

e

0.2

9 LQ

M

0.7

LQM

1.

6 LQ

M

Sty

rene

8.

1 E

IC

19

EIC

4

3 E

IC

Col

latio

n of

Hum

an

Hea

lth S

GV

s an

d S

oil S

cre

enin

g V

alue

s –

Re

sid

en

tial w

ith c

ons

ump

tion

of

hom

e g

row

n p

rod

uce

_

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

__

___

____

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

_

Do

cu

men

t N

o:

D117

Vers

ion

:4.1

Is

su

e D

ate

: 28

/01/

15

Au

tho

r: J

Rho

ades

A

uth

ori

sed

by:

R G

riffit

hs

Pag

e:

9 of

11

© D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

iron

me

ntal

Co

nsul

tant

s Li

mite

d.

No

par

t of

this

do

cum

ent

ma

y be

re

prod

uce

d u

nles

s p

rior

writ

ten

pe

rmis

sion

ha

s b

een

gra

nte

d.

S

em

i-V

ola

tile

Org

an

ic C

om

po

un

ds

(S

VO

C)

an

d O

the

r O

rga

nic

Co

mp

ou

nd

s

Co

mp

ou

nd

1

% S

OM

S

ou

rce

2.5

- 3

%

SO

M

So

urc

e

6%

SO

M

So

urc

e

Ch

loro

be

nze

nes

1,2

-Dic

hlor

oben

zen

e 2

3 LQ

M

55

LQM

1

30

LQM

1,3

-Dic

hlor

oben

zen

e 0.

4 LQ

M

1

LQM

2.

3 LQ

M

1,4-

Dic

hlor

oben

zen

e 6

1 LQ

M

15

0 LQ

M

35

0 LQ

M

1,2

,3-T

rich

loro

be

nze

ne

1.5

LQM

3.

6 LQ

M

8.6

LQM

1,2

,4-T

rich

loro

be

nze

ne

2.6

LQM

6.

4 LQ

M

15

LQM

1,3

,5-T

rich

loro

be

nze

ne

0.3

3 LQ

M

0.8

1 LQ

M

1.9

LQM

1,2

,3,4

-T

etr

ach

loro

ben

zen

e

15

LQM

3

6 LQ

M

78

LQM

1,2

,3,5

-T

etr

ach

loro

ben

zen

e

0.6

6 LQ

M

1.6

LQM

3.

7 LQ

M

1,2

,4,5

-T

etr

ach

loro

ben

zen

e

0.3

3 LQ

M

0.7

7 LQ

M

1.6

LQM

Pe

nta

chlo

rob

enze

ne

5.

8 LQ

M

12

LQM

2

2 LQ

M

He

xach

loro

be

nze

ne

1.

8 (0

.2)

LQM

3.

3 (0

.5)

LQM

4.

9 LQ

M

Pth

tala

tes

Bis

(2

-e

thyl

he

xyl)

ph

tha

late

2

80

(8.6

8)

EIC

6

10

(21

.6)

EIC

1

,10

0

(51

.7)

EIC

Die

thyl

pht

hala

te

12

0 (1

3.7

) E

IC

26

0 (2

9.1

) E

IC

57

0 (6

5)

EIC

Di-

n-b

utyl

pht

hala

te

13

(4.6

5)

EIC

3

1 (1

1.4

) E

IC

67

(27

.3)

EIC

Di-

n-o

ctyl

ph

tha

late

2

30

0

(32

.6)

EIC

2

80

0

(81

.5)

EIC

3

10

0 (1

96

) E

IC

Bu

tyl b

en

zyl p

hth

ala

te

14

00

(2

6.3

) E

IC

33

00

(6

4.7

) E

IC

72

00

(15

4)

EIC

Ph

en

ols

Ph

en

ol

42

0 S

GV

Ph

en

ol

12

0 LQ

M

20

0 LQ

M

38

0 LQ

M

2,4

-Dim

ethy

lphe

nol

19

EIC

4

3 E

IC

97

EIC

To

tal C

reso

ls (

2-,

3-

an

d

4-m

eth

ylp

hen

ol)

80

EIC

1

80

EIC

4

00

EIC

Ch

loro

ph

en

ols

Ch

loro

phe

nol

s (e

xce

pt

Pe

nta

chlo

rop

hen

ol)

0.8

7 LQ

M

2

LQM

4.

5 LQ

M

Pe

nta

chlo

rop

hen

ol

0.2

2 LQ

M

0.5

2 LQ

M

1.2

LQM

Oth

er

Bip

he

nyl

6

6 (3

4.4

) E

IC

16

0 E

IC

36

0 E

IC

Bro

mo

form

2.

8 E

IC

5.9

EIC

1

3 E

IC

2-C

hlo

ron

ap

hth

ale

ne

3.7

EIC

9.

2 E

IC

22

EIC

2,4

-Din

itro

tolu

ene

1.5

EIC

3.

2 E

IC

7.2

EIC

2,6

-Din

itro

tolu

ene

0.7

8 E

IC

1.7

EIC

3.

9 E

IC

Hex

ach

loro

etha

ne

0.2

EIC

0

.48

EIC

1.

1 E

IC

Trib

uty

l tin

oxi

de

0

.25

EIC

0

.59

EIC

1.

3 E

IC

Col

latio

n of

Hum

an H

ealth

SG

Vs

an

d S

oil

Scr

ee

nin

g V

alu

es –

Re

sid

en

tial w

ith c

ons

ump

tion

of

hom

e g

row

n p

rod

uce

_

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

__

___

____

__

___

___

__

___

___

___

___

___

__

___

___

_

Do

cu

men

t N

o:

D117

Vers

ion

:4.1

Is

su

e D

ate

: 28

/01/

15

Au

tho

r: J

Rho

ades

A

uth

ori

sed

by:

R G

riffit

hs

Pag

e:

10 o

f 11

© D

elta

-Sim

ons

Env

iron

me

ntal

Co

nsul

tant

s Li

mite

d.

No

par

t of

this

do

cum

ent

ma

y be

re

prod

uce

d u

nles

s p

rior

writ

ten

pe

rmis

sion

ha

s b

een

gra

nte

d.

P

CB

s, F

ura

ns

an

d D

iox

ins

Co

mp

ou

nd

1

% S

OM

S

ou

rce

2.5

- 3

%

SO

M

So

urc

e

6%

SO

M

So

urc

e

Sum

of P

CD

Ds,

PC

DF

s a

nd

dio

xin

-lik

e P

CB

s -

- -

- 0

.00

8 S

GV

v.1

.05

Pesti

cid

es a

nd

He

rbic

ide

s

Co

mp

ou

nd

1

% S

OM

S

ou

rce

2.5

- 3

%

SO

M

So

urc

e

6%

SO

M

So

urc

e

Ald

rin

5.7

LQM

6.

6 LQ

M

7.1

LQM

Die

ldrin

0

.97

LQM

2

LQ

M

3.5

LQM

Atr

azin

e 3.

3 LQ

M

7.6

LQM

17

.4

LQM

Dic

hlor

vos

0.0

32

LQM

0

.06

6 LQ

M

0.1

4 LQ

M

En

do

sulfa

n (

alp

ha

) 7.

4 LQ

M

18

LQM

4

1 LQ

M

En

do

sulfa

n (

bet

a)

7

LQM

1

7 LQ

M

39

LQM

alp

ha

-H

exa

chlo

rocy

clo

he

xan

es

0.2

3 LQ

M

0.5

5 LQ

M

1.2

LQM

be

ta-

He

xach

loro

cycl

oh

exa

ne

s 0

.08

5 LQ

M

0.2

LQM

0

.46

LQM

ga

mm

a-

He

xach

loro

cycl

oh

exa

ne

s (i

nc.

Lin

da

ne)

0.0

6 LQ

M

0.1

4 LQ

M

0.3

3 LQ

M

E

xp

losiv

es

Co

mp

ou

nd

1

% S

OM

S

ou

rce

2.5

- 3

%

SO

M

So

urc

e

6%

SO

M

So

urc

e

2,4

,6 T

rinitr

oto

luen

e

(TN

T)

1.6

LQM

3.

7 LQ

M

8.1

LQM

RD

X

12

0 LQ

M

25

0 LQ

M

54

0 LQ

M

HM

X

5.7

LQM

1

3 LQ

M

26

LQM

Appendix II

April 2009 Page 1 of 2

RISK DEFINITIONS

Consequence to Receptor Definition Matrix Human Health Controlled Waters Buildings/Services

Severe Consequence

Acute or chronic permanent impact on

human health.

Sensitive controlled water pollution ongoing, or just about to occur.

Catastrophic collapse

Moderate Consequence

Chronic permanent impact on human health

Gradual pollution of sensitive controlled

water

Degradation of materials

Mild Consequence

Chronic temporary impact on human health

Gradual pollution of non- sensitive controlled

water

Noticeable change, non-structural

Standard Risk Matrix

Severe Consequence

Moderate Consequence

Mild Consequence

Higher Probability

Very High Risk

High Risk

Medium Risk

Median Probability

High Risk

Medium Risk

Low Risk

Lower Probability

Medium Risk

Low Risk

Very Low Risk

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Limited

3 Henley Office Park, Doddington Road, Lincoln LN6 3QR. Switchboard: 0870 0400 012

April 2009 Page 2 of 2

Probability Definitions

Probability

Definition in Context

Higher

Positive evidence of hazard, pathway and receptor

Median

Suspect hazard, pathway, and receptor

Lower

No evidence of hazard, pathway, and receptor

Risk Rank Definitions

Rank

Definition in Context

Very High Risk

Demonstrable contaminated land situation, highest threat & liability level, urgent action recommended.

High Risk

Likely contaminated land situation, risk assessment and action recommended.

Medium Risk

Plausible contaminated land situation, risk assessment and possible action recommended.

Low Risk

Unlikely contaminated land situation, possible risk assessment and possible action.

Very Low Risk

Negligible risk, no action recommended except vigilance for changes in conditions.

Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Limited

3 Henley Office Park, Doddington Road, Lincoln LN6 3QR. Switchboard: 0870 0400 012

Appendix III

KEY TO BOREHOLE AND TRIAL PIT LOGS

Document No: D104 Version: 1.0 Issue Date: 30/04/15 Author: D Ellis Authorised by: R Griffiths Page: 1 of 2

© Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Limited. No part of this document may be reproduced unless prior written permission has been granted.

MATERIAL LEGENDS

Topsoil

Made Ground

Made Ground 2

Concrete

Clay

Silt

Sand

Gravel

Peat

Cobbles

Boulders

Mudstone

Siltstone

Sandstone

Limestone

Chalk

Coal

Breccia

Conglomerate

Igneous

Metamorphic

Volcanoclastic

Gypsum

Shale

Ironstone

Bedrock (Unidentified)

Void

INSTALLATION / BACKFILL LEGENDS

Sand

Gravel

Bentonite

Cement/Grout

Arisings

Concrete

Plain Pipe

Slotted Pipe

Piezometer Tip

Legend symbols in general accordance with BS 5930 (1999) and AGS.

KEY TO BOREHOLE AND TRIAL PIT LOGS

Document No: D104 Version: 1.0 Issue Date: 30/04/15 Author: D Ellis Authorised by: R Griffiths Page: 2 of 2

© Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Limited. No part of this document may be reproduced unless prior written permission has been granted.

SAMPLE TYPES

ACM Asbestos Containing Material Sample B Bulk Disturbed Sample BLK Block Sample C Core Sample CBR Undisturbed Sample for California Bearing Ratio Test – 154mm diameter D Disturbed Sample - Tub ES Soil Sample for Environmental Testing EW Water Sample for Environmental Testing J Disturbed Sample - Jar U Undisturbed Driven Tube Sample – 70/102mm diameter, 450mm long U(P) Undisturbed Pushed Piston Sample – 102mm diameter, 450mm long U(TW) Undisturbed Thin Walled Push In Sample – 100mm diameter, 450mm long V Disturbed Sample - Vial

TEST TYPES

CPT Cone Penetrometer Test (kN/m2) FID Flame Ionisation Detector Test (ppm) HSV In-Situ Hand Sheer Vane Test (kN/m2) PID Photoionisation Detector Test (ppm) SPT (S) Standard Penetration Test – Split Spoon Sampler SPT (C) Standard Penetration Test – Solid 60 Degree Cone

CORE DETAILS

If Fracture Spacing (mm) – Minimum, Average, Maximum NI Non-Intact where >25 fracture spacings per metre TCR Total Core Recovery (%) SCR Solid Core Recovery (%) RQD Rock Quality Designation (%) AF Air Flush Return (%) WF Water Flush Return (%)

WATER COLUMN DETAILS

First Water Strike, Second Water Strike etc.

Standing Water Level – First Strike, Second Strike etc.

Seepage

Description of Strata

TOPSOIL: Soft dark brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional roots. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to rounded flintSoft brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))Soft to firm orange brown slightly silty CLAY. Silt content increases with depth. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))

Hand pit complete at 1.00 m bgl.

LegendStrata Depth(m bgl)

0.20

0.40

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.20)

(0.60)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.94

34.74

34.14

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.60 ES

Head Office3 Henley Way, Doddington Road

Lincoln, LN6 3QRTel: +44 (0 )870 0400 012Fax: +44 (0) 1522 698393

Email: [email protected]

Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT201Page:1 of 1

Hewett School, Norwich

Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier

Remarks:1. Engineer verified logged in general accordance to BS 5930:2010. 2. Area CAT scanned prior to excavation. 3. Hand Pit remained dry on completion. 4. Backfilled with arisings.

Water Level Observations

Date Time Strike (m) Duration Standing

Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm

Coordinates (National Grid) / Level (mAOD):E:622845 N:306646 Level:35.14

Excavated By:Delta Drilling

Plant Used:Hand Tools

Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional roots. Gravel is fine to medium sub-angular to rounded brick and flint. Light brown slightly gravelly fine to medium SAND, with occasional pockets of clay. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.30

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.30)

(0.70)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.97

34.27

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT202Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional roots and glass fragments. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to subrounded flint. Soft brown slightly silty CLAY. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))

Soft brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-rounded chalk and flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.20

0.70

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.50)

(0.30)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.92

34.42

34.12

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.40 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT203Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft dark brown slightly silty CLAY, with occasional roots.Soft brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFTFORMATION (DIAMICTON))

Soft to firm orange brown slightly silty slightly sandy CLAY. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.20

0.60

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.40)

(0.40)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.67

34.27

33.87

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT204Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft dark brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional roots. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint.

Soft to firm orange brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))Soft to firm orange brown clayey gravelly fine to coarse SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.40

0.60

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.40)

(0.20)

(0.40)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.17

33.97

33.57

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.20 ES

0.80 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT205Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft dark brown slightly silty CLAY, with occasional roots.

Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY, wth occasional flint cobbles. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON)) Soft brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFTFORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.30

0.60

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.30)

(0.30)

(0.40)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

33.95

33.65

33.25

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.20 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT206Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly silty CLAY, with occasional roots. (TOPSOIL) MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional wood fragments. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded brick and flint.Soft to firm orange brown slightly clayey gravelly fine to coarse SAND, with occasional flint cobbles. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.20

0.50

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.30)

(0.50)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.12

33.82

33.32

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.40 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT207Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly silty CLAY, with occasional roots. (TOPSOIL) MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-angular brick and flint.

Soft brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.20

0.80

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.60)

(0.20)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.58

33.98

33.78

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT208Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly silty CLAY. (TOPSOIL)MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-angular brick and flint.

Soft brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFTFORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.20

0.70

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.50)

(0.30)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.10

33.60

33.30

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.80 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT209Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft dark brown silty CLAY, with occasional roots. Soft brown clayey gravelly fine to coarse SAND, with occasional flint cobbles. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-angular flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.20

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.80)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

33.98

33.18

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT210Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly silty CLAY, with occasional roots. MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded brick and flint. Soft brown and orange brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional flint cobbles. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.20

0.50

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.30)

(0.50)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

33.90

33.60

33.10

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.70 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT211Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded brick, flint and pottery fragments.

Brown slightly clayey slightly gravelly fine to coarse SAND. Gravelly fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON)) Soft to firm orange brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY, wih occasional flint cobbles. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.40

0.70

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.40)

(0.30)

(0.30)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.02

33.72

33.42

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.20 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT212Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft dark brown slightly silty CLAY, with occasional roots. Orange brown slightly clayey slightly gravelly fine to coarse SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.20

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.80)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.43

33.63

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.60 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT213Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft dark brown slightly silty CLAY, with occasional roots. Orange brown slightly gravelly clayey fine to coarse SAND, with occasional flint cobbles. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rouded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON)) Soft to firm brown and orange brown slightly silty CLAY. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.20

0.60

0.90

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.40)

(0.30)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.70

34.30

34.00

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.40 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

CPT214Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

0.90m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft to firm brown very sandy CLAY.

Soft to firm orange brown sandy CLAY. (LOWESTOFTFORMATION (DIAMICTON)

Orange brown fine to medium SAND. (LOWESTOFTFORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.25

0.50

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.25)

(0.25)

(0.50)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

35.41

35.16

34.66

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

12

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.20 ES0.30 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP201Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

24/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:SW

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint.

Soft to firm orange brown sandy CLAY. (LOWESTOFTFORMATION (DIAMICTON))Firm orange brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint and chalk. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.30

0.50

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.30)

(0.20)

(0.50)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

35.17

34.97

34.47

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.60 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP202Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

24/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:SW

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-rounded brick and flint. Soft brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFTFORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.200.30

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.10)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

35.0034.90

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP203Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

0.30m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft brown sandy CLAY.

Orange brown fine to medium SAND, with occasional clayey horizons. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.20

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.80)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

35.31

34.51

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.40 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP204Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

24/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:SW

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft brown slightly gravelly sandy CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint.Orange brown slightly gravelly fine to medium SAND, with occasional clayey horizons. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.20

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.80)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

35.17

34.37

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP205Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

24/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:SW

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft brown sandy CLAY.

Orange brown slightly gravelly fine to medium SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.30

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.30)

(0.70)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.96

34.26

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.20 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP206Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

24/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:SW

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Asphalt.MADE GROUND: Brown and orange brown gravelly fine to coarse SAND, with occasional cobble sized brick fragments. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-angular brick, flint and concrete. Orange brown slightly gravelly fine to coarse SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-angular flint. (LOWESTOFTFORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.10

0.40

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.10)

(0.30)

(0.60)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

35.18

34.88

34.28

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

23

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.00 -0.10

D

0.20 ES0.30 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP207Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Asphalt.

MADE GROUND: Brown and yellowish brown gravelly fine to coarse SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint and asphalt.MADE GROUND: Greyish brown clayey gravelly fine to coarse SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint and asphalt.Soft to firm orange brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.15

0.30

0.55

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.15)

(0.15)

(0.25)

(0.45)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

35.03

34.88

34.63

34.18

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

3

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.00 -0.15

D

0.20 ES

0.40 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP208Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Asphalt.MADE GROUND: Brown gravelly fine to coarse SAND, with occasional half bricks. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-rounded brick and flint.MADE GROUND: Orange brown gravelly fine to coarse SAND, with cobble sized brick fragments. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-angular brick and flint. Brown sandy CLAY. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.10

0.30

0.80

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.10)

(0.20)

(0.50)

(0.20)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

35.18

34.98

34.48

34.28

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

3

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.00 -0.10

D

0.20 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP209Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: AsphaltMADE GROUND: Brown gravelly fine to coarse SAND, with occasional metal fragments. Gravel fine to coarse angular to sub-angular brick, flint and concreteMADE GROUND: Orange brown gravelly fine to coarse SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded brick, flint and asphalt.Soft to firm brown slightly sandy CLAY. (LOWESTOFTFORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.05

0.25

0.70

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.45)

(0.30)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

35.19

34.99

34.54

34.24

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

12

3

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.00 -0.05

D

0.10 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP210Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint.

Soft brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFTFORMATION (DIAMICTON))Soft to firm orange brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to subrounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.30

0.60

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.30)

(0.30)

(0.40)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.70

34.40

34.00

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.20 ES

0.40 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP211Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft dark brown slightly silty CLAY.

Soft to firm dark brown slightly silty slightly sandy CLAY. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))

Orange brown slightly clayey fine to coarse SAND. (LOWESTOFTFORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.30

0.60

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.30)

(0.30)

(0.40)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.45

34.15

33.75

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.20 ES

0.70 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP212Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft dark brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional roots. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. Soft orange brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional flint cobbles. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))

From 0.70 m - Becoming clayey.



0.30

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.30)

(0.70)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.23

33.53

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.20 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP213Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


TOPSOIL: Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional roots. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rouned flint.

Soft brown slightly sandy CLAY. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



1.20

1.50

Strata Thickness

(m)

(1.20)

(0.30)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.63

34.33

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.30 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP214Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.50m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional roots and half bricks. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded brick and flint.

Soft brown slightly silty CLAY. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.80

1.50

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.80)

(0.70)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

34.49

33.80

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.30 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP215Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.50m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional roots. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded brick and flint.

Soft to firm brown silty CLAY. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.90

1.20

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.90)

(0.30)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

33.91

33.61

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.20 ES

1.00 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP216Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.20m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly silty CLAY. (TOPSOIL)

MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional flint cobbles. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-rounded brick and flint.

Soft brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.40

0.80

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.40)

(0.40)

(0.20)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

33.99

33.59

33.39

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.80 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP217Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly silty CLAY. (TOPSOIL)MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-angular brick and flint.

Soft brown sandy CLAY. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.20

0.60

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.20)

(0.40)

(0.40)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

33.92

33.52

33.12

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.50 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP218Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown sligtly silty slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional roots and pottery fragments. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded brick and flint.

Soft brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to medium sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.55

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.55)

(0.45)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

33.83

33.38

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.20 ES

0.70 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP219Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional roots. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to rounded brick and flint.

Soft orange brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.50

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.50)

(0.50)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

33.63

33.13

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.20 ES

0.70 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP220Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse angular to sub-angular brick and flint.

MADE GROUND: Asphalt.Soft to firm brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY, with occasional lenses of clay. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.550.65

1.10

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.55)

(0.10)

(0.45)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

33.3733.27

32.82

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.30 ES

0.70 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP221Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.10m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30


MADE GROUND: Soft dark brown slightly silty slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded brick and flint. (TOPSOIL)

Soft to firm brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse sub-angular to sub-rounded flint. (LOWESTOFT FORMATION (DIAMICTON))



0.40

1.00

Strata Thickness

(m)

(0.40)

(0.60)

Reduced Level

(mAOD)

33.64

33.04

Casing Diameter

(mm)Water

Sample Details

Depth (m) Type Ref

1

2

Test Details

Depth (m) Results

Backfill

0.10 ES

0.60 ES




Project No:

Project:

15-1091.02Hole ID:

HDTP222Page:1 of 1


Hand Pit LogDate:

23/03/2016Client:

Kier




Pit Diameter

Depth (m) Dia (mm)

1.00m 120mm




Logged:NK

Checked:MT

Approved:TW

Scale:1:30

unitsmmmmmmmmminsminsm3m2mins

DEPTH (m)0.0 Arisings 0.0

0.2

Gravel (20mm) 1.2

1.9 1.9

1-3

PROJECT NUMBER

Hewett School, Norwich Mar-16 15-1091.02CLIENT SOAKAWAY NUMFILL NUMBER

PROJECT NAME

SOAKAWAY TEST RESULTSDATE

Kier In accordance with BRE Digest 365 (1991 with amendments in 2003 and 2007) S201

DEPTH (m)

Brown slightly gravelly, sandy CLAY

Orange brown slightly gravelly CLAY

or 3.09E-05 2.24E-05 2.33E-05

LOG BACKFILL

Time for outflow 23.75 32.92 31.66Soil infiltration rate, f = 0.0000309361 0.0000224489 0.0000233427

2.24E-05 m/s

Vp75 - 25 (volume outflowing between 75% and 25% effective depth) 0.127 0.129 0.129Mean surface area for outflow (50% effective depth) 2.88 2.91 2.91

3.75 9.17 9.22Time at 25% full 27.50 42.08 40.88

Depth at 75% full 1.40 1.39 1.40

Fill 1 Fill 2 Fill 3

Time at 75% full

0.67

Recommended soil infiltration rateDepth (final reading) 1.89 1.88 1.90Pit depth 1.90Pit length 2.20Pit width 0.50

Depth at 25% full 1.73 1.72 1.73

Depth to first reading 1.24 1.23 1.23Maximum effective depth 0.65 0.65

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 180 360 540 720 900 1080 1260 1440

Dept

h (m

)

Time (minutes)

Infil 1 Infil 2

Infil 3 75% Effective Depth

25% Effective Depth



0.2

Gravel (20mm) 1.1

1.9 1.9


Depth at 25% full 1.67 1.61 1.67


660.00 387.50 655.07

Depth at 75% full 1.36 1.34 1.36


Time at 75% full

0.63


1.21E-06 m/s


40.36 45.00 45.67Time at 25% full

DEPTH (m)

Brown slightly clayey slightly gravelly SAND

Orange brown sandy gravelly CLAY

or 1.21E-06 2.18E-06 1.23E-06

LOG BACKFILL

PROJECT NAME


Kier In accordance with BRE Digest 365 (1991 with amendments in 2003 and 2007) S202 1-3

PROJECT NUMBER


0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 180 360 540 720 900 1080 1260 1440

Dept

h (m

)

Time (minutes)

Infil 1 Infil 2


25% Effective Depth



0.2

Gravel (20mm) 1.1

2.2 2.2

1-3

PROJECT NUMBER


PROJECT NAME


Kier In accordance with BRE Digest 365 (1991 with amendments in 2003 and 2007) S203

DEPTH (m)

Brown slightly clayey slightly gravelly SAND

Orange brown sandy gravelly CLAY

or 1.90E-06 1.80E-06 1.53E-06

LOG BACKFILL


1.53E-06 m/s


11.67 30.23 29.08Time at 25% full 400.00 442.50 520.23

Depth at 75% full 1.61 1.57 1.59


Time at 75% full

0.71


Depth at 25% full 1.95 1.86 1.94


0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 180 360 540 720 900 1080 1260 1440

Dept

h (m

)

Time (minutes)

Infil 1 Infil 2


25% Effective Depth

Appendix IV

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

P

Issue

02

ol, Norwic

60190R001

PROJE

STAT

Date

30/03/16

ch

1RW

ECT: W

IC CO

F

CL

CON

Final

WHER

ONE PE

FACTU

LIENT

NTRACT

Descripti

Front Cov

RY SC

ENETR

UAL RE

T: DEL

T No.: PO

ion

ver

CHOOL

RATIO

EPOR

TA SIM

O NOR4

Prep

RW

L, NOR

ON TES

RT

MONS

4691

pared C

C

RWICH

STING

S

Checked A

D D

Page 1

H

G

Approved

DW

1 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

Date:

Our Re

Attentio

Dear M

We hav

above p

We hop

this pro

please

Yours fa

In Situ

Darren

Directo

Delta S

3 Chalk

19 Rosa

Norwich

NR1 1S

ol, Norwic

60190R001

30 M

f: 116

on: Mr Jam

r Harrison

ve pleasure

project.

pe that you

oject. If yo

do not hesi

aithfully,

Site Invest

Ward

or

Simons

khill House

ary Road

h

SZ

ch

1RW

March 2016

60190

mes Harrison

STA

A

e in providin

are satisfie

ou should h

tate to cont

tigation Lim

6

n

ATIC CONE

AT WHERRY

ng a digital

d with the p

have any q

tact us. We

mited

Content

PENETRA

Y SCHOOL

copy of ou

performance

queries abo

e look forwa

ts

ATION TEST

L, NORWIC

ur report an

e of our sta

out any asp

ard to being

TING

CH

nd data in A

ff, equipme

pect of the

of service t

AGS format

ent and repo

works carr

to you in the

Page 2

t for the

orting on

ried out,

e future.

2 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

Conten

1.0 I

2.0 F

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4 P

3.0 C

3.1

3.1

3.1

3.1

3.2

3.2

3.2

3.2

3.2

3.2

4.0 G

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7

ol, Norwic

60190R001

nts

NTRODUC

FIELDWOR

CPT RIG

CPTU CO

TEST PR

POSITIONIN

CONE PEN

ESTIMAT

.1 Estim

.2 Fricti

.3 Dept

MEASUR

2.1 Pore

2.2 Corre

2.3 Pore

2.4 Soil U

2.5 In Sit

GEOTECHN

SOIL BEH

STANDA

SHEAR S

RELATIV

FRICTION

FINES CO

CONSTR

ch

1RW

CTION ........

RK ..............

.................

ONE ..........

ROCEDURE

NG .............

NETRATION

TED SOIL B

mated Soil B

on Ratio (R

h Correctio

RED PORE

Pressure R

ected Cone

Pressure R

Unit Weight

tu Pore Pre

NICAL PAR

HAVIOUR T

RD PENET

STRENGTH

VE DENSITY

N ANGLE .

ONTENT (F

RAINED MO

..................

..................

..................

..................

E ................

..................

N TEST RES

BEHAVIOUR

Behaviour T

Rf) ...............

n ...............

PRESSUR

Results (u2)

e Resistance

Ratio (Bq) ...

t .................

essure ........

RAMETERS

TYPE INDE

TRATION TE

H ................

Y (Dr) .........

..................

FC) ............

ODULUS ....

Content

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

SULTS ......

R TYPE PL

Type ...........

..................

..................

E PLOT (C

..................

e (qt) ..........

..................

..................

..................

S .................

EX ...............

EST (SPT)

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

ts

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

LOT (FORM

..................

..................

..................

PT0002) ...

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

N VALUE .

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

M CPT0001)

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

) .................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

Page 3

.......... 5

.......... 6

.......... 6

.......... 6

.......... 6

.......... 7

.......... 8

.......... 8

.......... 8

.......... 9

.......... 9

........ 10

........ 10

........ 10

........ 11

........ 11

........ 12

........ 13

........ 13

........ 14

........ 15

........ 15

........ 16

........ 17

........ 17

3 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

4.7

4.7

5.0 RE

APPEN

CON

CON

CPT

14 TO

SOIL

EXPL

APPEN

APPEN

ol, Norwic

60190R001

7.1 Fine

7.2 Coar

EFERENCE

NDIX A .......

E DATASH

E CALIBRA

PROJECT

ONNE TRA

L DESCRIPT

LANATION

NDIX B .......

NDIX C .......

ch

1RW

Grained ....

rse Grained

ES .............

.................

HEET .........

ATION CER

SUMMARY

ACK MOUNT

TION TABL

OF SYMBO

.................

.................

..................

.................

..................

..................

..................

RTIFICATE

Y SHEET ...

TED CPT R

LES ............

OLS ...........

..................

..................

Content

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

S15CFIP.1

..................

RIG DATA S

..................

..................

..................

..................

ts

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

032 ...........

..................

SHEET ......

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

Page 4

........ 17

........ 18

........ 19

........ 21

........ 22

........ 23

........ 24

........ 25

........ 26

........ 27

........ 31

...... 126

28

59

4 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

1.0

At the r

carried

The inv

were pe

The fiel

Fieldwo

CPT Ri

Operato

Date St

Date Fi

In Situ S

Main Co

Comple

15 Stat

test me

shoulde

Provisio

ol, Norwic

60190R001

INTROD

request of

out a soils

vestigation

erformed at

dwork deta

ork Summa

g Used

ors

tarted

nished

S.I. Project

ontractor’s

eted Fieldw

tic Cone Pe

easured Co

er position (

on of factua

Fig

ch

1RW

UCTION

Delta Simo

investigatio

consisted o

locations s

ails are show

ary

Manager

Site Manag

Figure 1.1

work Summ

enetration T

one Resista

(u2), inclinat

al report with

ure 1.2: Tab

ons (The Cl

on at Wherry

of performin

set out by th

wn below in

ger

: Table sho

mary

Tests (CPT

ance (qc), S

tion in X and

h estimated

ble showing t

Introduct

ient), In Sit

y School, N

ng Static Co

he Client.

figure 1.1 a

14 T

Ian M

23/0

23/0

Darr

Malc

wing the field

s) to a max

Sleeve fictio

d Y planes.

d soil type, g

the complete

tion

tu Site Inve

Norwich.

one Penetr

and figure 1

Tonne track

Musson and

03/2016

03/2016

ren Ward

colm

dwork summ

ximum dep

on (fs), Me

geotechnica

ed fieldwork s

estigation Li

ration Tests

1.2.

k mounted C

d Lewis Sm

mary details.

pth of 9.89m

easured Po

al paramete

summary det

imited (In S

s (CPTs). A

CPT rig CPT

mith

m or refusa

re Pressure

ers and AGS

tails.

Page 5

Situ S.I.)

All tests

T 006

l. Each

e in the

S data.

5 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

2.0

2.1

All work

rig is pr

2.2

A sing

requirem

parame

piezo fi

cone us

2.3

The tes

and pie

The fina

or when

perform

progres

The da

the pus

The rat

or hard

Results

recorde

Before

calibrat

drift dur

quality

on their

ol, Norwic

60190R001

FIELDW

CPT RIG

ks were per

resented in

CPTU CO

le electric

ments of A

eters are sh

lter was mo

sed is show

TEST PRO

sts are carr

ezocone pen

al depths of

n the maxim

med is show

ss reports.

ta is transm

sh rods to th

e of penetra

strata. A

s are displa

ed on the co

each test is

ion. At the

ring the test

check on th

r correspond

ch

1RW

WORK

rformed wit

Appendix A

ONE

CPTU con

Application

hown in figu

ounted in th

wn in Appen

OCEDURE

ried out in

netration tes

f the tests w

mum safe ca

wn in Appe

mitted from

he data acq

ation is kep

copy of the

ayed instan

omputer har

s carried ou

end of eac

t. These va

he data and

ding test re

th a 14 tonn

A.

ne was us

Class 2 of

ure 1.2. Th

e shoulder

dix A.

E

accordance

st (ISO/FDI

were determ

apacity of th

endix A wh

the digital

uisition syst

pt constant

e depth enc

ntaneously

rd disc.

ut zero value

ch test, zero

alues are in

d the testin

sults on for

Fieldwo

ne CPT trac

sed S15CF

ISO/ FDIS

he cone ha

(u2) positio

e with the I

S 22476-1

mined by eit

he equipme

hich has b

CPTU thro

tem.

at 2cm/s ±1

coder calibr

on the com

es are taken

o values are

nspected du

g procedure

rm CPT000

rk

ck mounted

FIP.1032 o

S 22476-1

ad a cross-s

n (see figur

nternationa

2012).

her comple

ent was rea

een compi

ugh an um

10% except

ration certifi

mputer logg

n of the con

e taken agai

uring the po

e. Individu

1 in Append

d Rig. A full

of a type

(2012). The

sectional ar

re 3.2). A f

al Standard

tion to the s

ached. A sc

led from th

bilical cable

t when pene

icate is sho

ging screen

ne to check

in to see if t

ost processi

al test zero

dix B.

data sheet

conforming

e cones m

rea of 15cm

full datashee

for electric

specified te

chedule of t

he operato

e that runs

etrating ver

own in Appe

n. The res

to see if it

there has b

ng stage. T

o values are

Page 6

t for this

to the

easured

m2. The

et of the

cal cone

st depth

the tests

r’s daily

through

ry dense

endix A.

sults are

is within

een any

This is a

e shown

6 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

2.4 PO

All posi

ol, Norwic

60190R001

OSITIONIN

tions were s

ch

1RW

G

set out by the Client on

Fieldwo

n site.

rk Page 77 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

3.0

All tests

describ

CPT000

and the

resistan

and cor

scale fo

3.1

The est

3.1.1

The es

upon th

varies d

depend

The inte

below (

The de

(1986))

BS5930

ol, Norwic

60190R001

CONE P

s carried w

ed in sectio

01 Estimate

e estimated

nce. The se

rrected valu

or the cone

ESTIMAT

timated soil

Measured c

Friction rati

Inclination,

Estimated b

Legend ind

Estimated

timation of

he variation

depending u

ding on the s

erpretation

figure 3.1).

nsity and s

and Su (Lu

0:1999. A l

ch

1RW

ENETRA

with the CPT

on 3.1 and 3

ed Soil Beh

d soil desc

econd graph

ues along w

resistance.

ED SOIL B

behaviour

cone end re

io (Rf);

X and Y ax

behaviour s

dicating soil

Soil Behav

soil behav

n of the fric

upon wheth

strength an

is based o

stiffness val

unne and Kl

ist of these

ATION TE

TU cone ar

3.2. Two gr

haviour Type

cription, the

h (form CPT

with the por

BEHAVIOU

type plot pr

esistance (q

xis;

soil type log

log (BS593

viour Type

viour type u

ction ratio in

her the soil

d densities

n Robertso

ues descrip

leven (1981

values are

CPT Resu

EST RES

re shown in

raphs are s

e Plot) show

ese are plo

T0002 Mea

re pressure

UR TYPE

resented in

qc) and slee

(Robertson

30:1999 leg

e

using meas

n respect to

is cohesive

of the soil.

on et. al. (19

ptions are b

1)) values fr

presented

ults

SULTS

n Appendix

shown for ea

ws the mea

otted at a

asured Pore

e results; th

PLOT (FO

Appendix B

eve friction (

n et.al 1986

end)

surements

o the cone

e or granula

986) (Frictio

based on d

rom the con

in Appendix

B and dis

ach test. T

asured read

0-20MPa s

e Pressure P

ese are plo

ORM CPT0

B details the

(fs);

6, friction rat

of cone an

resistance

ar. The con

on ratio cha

derived N60

ne resistanc

x A.

plays all re

he first grap

dings from t

scale for th

Plot) shows

otted at a 0

0001)

e following:

tio chart)

nd friction is

. The fricti

e resistanc

art) which is

0 (Robertso

ce in accord

Page 8

esults as

ph (form

he cone

he cone

derived

0-80MPa

s based

ion ratio

ce varies

s shown

on et. al.

dance to

8 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

3.1.2

The fric

a very u

3.1.3

All tests

has be

Proced

To calc

where: vertical

The eq

axial inc

ol, Norwic

60190R001

Friction Ra

ction ratio (R

useful param

Depth Cor

s in the rep

een calcula

ure (2001).

ulate the co

z = penetral = penetratCh = correaxis.

uation for c

clinometer i

ch

1RW

Figure 3.1:

atio (Rf)

Rf) is the ra

meter for ca

rrection

port have be

ated using

orrected dep

ation depth, tion length,

ection factor

calculating t

is:

Robertson e

tio between

arrying out s

een correct

the metho

pth the follo

in m; in m;

r for the ef

the correcti

CPT Resu

et al., 1986 s

n the sleeve

soil interpre

ted for dept

od describe

owing formu

∙

ffect of the

on factor fo

∝

ults

soil behaviou

e friction an

etation

(L

th differenc

ed in the

ula is used:

e inclination

or the influe

ur type chart.

d the cone

Lunne et al.,

ce caused b

Internationa

n of the CP

ence of the

resistance.

, 1997)

by inclinatio

al Referenc

PTU relative

inclination

Page 9

This is

on. This

ce Test

e to the

for a bi-

9 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

3.2

Behind

pressur

followin

3.2.1

The CP

and sat

that is

pore pre

The filte

report t

3.2.2

For eac

‘unequa

cone.

The cor

Where

is geom

ol, Norwic

60190R001

MEASURE

each estim

re results a

ng:

Measured P

Corrected c

Pore press

Sleeve frict

Pore Press

PTU measu

turation is m

not free dr

essures ge

er element

he filter was

Figure 3.2:

Corrected

ch penetrat

al area effe

rrections ha

is the co

metrically me

ch

1RW

ED PORE

mated soil

as well as

Pore pressu

cone resista

ure ratio (B

tion (fs)

sure Resul

ured the por

maintained

aining it wi

nerated) cre

can be mou

s mounted

: Diagram sh

Cone Resi

tion test, th

ect’ due to t

ave been ap

ne area rat

easured).

u1

u2

u3

PRESSUR

type plots

corrected

ure (u2),

ance (qt);

Bq)

ts (u2)

re pressure

it will norm

ll record th

eated by the

unted in on

in the u2, or

howing pore

istance (qt)

he measure

the influenc

pplied using

∙

tio, which is

CPT Resu

RE PLOT

in Appendi

and derive

e during pen

ally measu

he total por

e cone pen

e of three p

r shoulder p

pressure filte

)

ed Cone R

ce of the am

g the followi

(Lun

s 0.869 for t

Friction Slee

Cone

ults

(CPT0002

ix B is a s

ed parame

netration.

re hydrosta

e pressure

etrating thro

positions. F

position (see

er locations (

Resistance,

mbient pore

ng equation

nne et al., 1

the cone us

Cone

Pene

eve

)

second plot

eters. The

If the mate

atic pore pre

(hydrostat

ough this m

For the tests

e figure 3.2

(after Lunne

qc, can be

e water pres

n:

1997)

sed on this

e

etrometer

showing t

ese logs de

rial is free

essure. In

ic plus any

material

s carried ou

)

et al., 1997)

e corrected

ssure acting

project (Th

Page 10

he pore

etail the

draining

material

y excess

ut in this

for the

g on the

his value

0 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

3.2.3

Pore p

penetra

Pore pr

where:

3.2.4

For calc

to be m

each so

Figure 3

Figure 3

ol, Norwic

60190R001

Pore Press

ressure rat

ation and the

ressure ratio

u2 = pore pu0 = equilibσvo = total oqt = cone re

Soil Unit W

culations in

made. For

oil classifica

3.3 below li

3.3: Estimate

ch

1RW

sure Ratio

tio is the r

e corrected

o as defined

pressure mebrium pore poverburden esistance co

Weight

volving the

all calculat

ation zone fr

sts the app

Zon

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

e of unit weig

(Bq)

ratio betwee

cone resis

d by Senne

easured betpressure stress orrected for

total overb

tions in this

rom the Ro

roximate un

ne

ghts based o

CPT Resu

en the mea

tance minu

set and Jan

ween the co

r unequal e

burden stres

s report, an

bertson et a

nit weight fo

Ap

on the Rober

al., 1997).

ults

asured por

s the total o

nbu (1985)

one and the

nd area effe

ss, an estim

n approxima

al., 1986 ch

or each zon

pproximate u

rtson et al.,(1

re pressure

overburden

is defined a

e friction sle

ects

mate of the s

ate unit we

hart.

e from Lunn

unit weight (

17.5

12.5

17.5

18

18

18

18.5

19

19.5

20

20.5

19

986) friction

e generated

stress.

as:

eeve

soil unit we

eight is assi

ne et al., 19

(kN/m3)

ratio chart (

Page 11

d during

eight has

igned to

997.

Lunne et

1 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

3.2.5

On the

pore pre

In the re

ol, Norwic

60190R001

In Situ Por

pore press

essure, u0.

eport, the w

ch

1RW

re Pressure

ure plot is a

This is calc

water table h

e

a second lin

culated from

has been in

CPT Resu

ne (in red) s

m a known o

nferred at 2m

ults

showing the

or estimate

m below gro

e inferred in

d water tab

ound level.

n situ or hyd

ble level.

Page 12

drostatic

2 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

4.0

A numb

from CP

this sec

relative

parame

Please

may no

4.1

The soi

allow a

discont

This ap

classific

approxi

behavio

The soi

The bou

for the t

ol, Norwic

60190R001

GEOTEC

ber of emp

PT data. T

ction. For

density are

eters describ

note that a

ot be appro

SOIL BEH

il behaviour

continuous

inuous natu

pproach has

cation chart

mated as c

our type ind

l behaviour

undaries of

table of soil

ch

1RW

CHNICAL

pirical corre

This report i

the CPT d

e derived an

bed in the s

a number o

opriate for a

HAVIOUR T

r type index

s variation o

ure of an ea

s been mo

t. The bou

concentric

ex (Lunne e

r type index

f soil behavi

behaviour

Geotec

L PARAM

lations can

ncludes a n

ata only so

nd are show

section are d

of the corre

all the soil

TYPE IND

x was derive

of (qc/pa)/N

arlier conver

dified for u

undaries be

circles, and

et al., 1997

x, Ic, can the

.

iour type ar

types.

chnical Pa

METERS

n be carried

number of t

oil behaviou

wn in Appen

derived and

elations are

types enco

DEX

ed by Jeffer

N60 with soil

rsion by Ro

se with the

etween soi

d the radiu

).

en be define

re then give

arameters

d out to de

these param

ur type, SP

ndix C. For

d displayed

e derived f

ountered o

ries and Da

type, which

bertson et a

e Robertson

l behaviour

us of each

ed as:

.

en in terms o

s

erive geotec

meters whic

PT values, s

the CPTU

in Appendi

for a certai

on this proj

avies (1991)

h was an im

al. (1986).

n (1990) no

r type zone

circle can

.

of the index

chnical par

ch are desc

shear stren

data all the

x C.

n type of s

ject.

). It was cr

mprovemen

ormalised C

es (2 to 7)

be used a

x, Ic. See fig

Page 13

rameters

cribed in

ngth and

e derived

soil, and

eated to

t on the

CPT soil

can be

as a soil

gure 4.1

3 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

Soil Be

4.2

The SP

These r

Figure 4

For the

type ind

ol, Norwic

60190R001

ehaviour Typ

Ic < 1.31

1.31 < Ic < 2

2.05 < Ic < 2

2.60 < Ic < 2

2.95 < Ic < 3

Ic > 3.60

STANDAR

PT N value c

ratios were

Zone

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

4.2: SPT N v

e best resul

dex, Ic. This

ch

1RW

pe Index, Ic

2.05

2.60

2.95

3.60

0

Figure 4

RD PENET

can be deriv

suggested

e

value ratios fr

ts for the c

s is the met

Geotec

(from

nor

4.1: Boundari

TRATION T

ved using d

by Roberts

Soil B

Sens

Or

Silty

Clayey

Sandy S

Silty SA

SAN

Grave

Very

SAND

rom Roberts

calculation o

thod used in

chnical Pa

Zone

m Robertson

rmalised ch

7

6

5

4

3

2

ies of soil be

TEST (SPT

differing ratio

son et al. (19

Behaviour T

sitive fine gra

rganic materi

CLAY

y CLAY to CL

SILT to silty

SILT to claye

AND to sand

ND to silty SA

SAND

ly SAND to S

stiff fine gra

D to clayey S

son et al., 198

of N60 it is

n this report

arameters

n 1990

hart)

ehaviour type

T) N VALU

os of the re

986) and ar

Type

ained

ial

LAY

y CLAY

ey SILT

y SILT

AND

SAND

ined

SAND

86.

recommend

t.

s

Soil B

Gravelly sa

Sands – c

sand

Sand mixtu

sandy silts

Silt mixture

clay

Clays: silty

Organic soi

e index, Ic.

UE

lationship b

re shown in

(qc/

ded to use

Behaviour Ty

nd to dense

clean sand

ures – silty

s – clayey s

clay to clay

ils - peats

between qc a

figure 4.2.

/pa)/N60

2

1

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

4

5

6

1

2

the soil be

Page 14

ype

sand

to silty

sand to

ilt to silty

and N60.

ehaviour

4 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

The rela

It is sug

the SPT

4.3

Estimat

equatio

where:

Resear

value o

su value

behavio

4.4

Relative

4.3). T

laborato

predom

demons

The cor

than 2.6

ol, Norwic

60190R001

ationship be

ggested (Je

T N values t

SHEAR S

tion of su fr

on:

Nkt = empirvo = total o

rch has sho

f 15. We p

e with an N

our type ind

RELATIVE

e density ha

This correla

ory conditio

minantly qua

strated in fig

rrelation in

60. The for

ch

1RW

etween N60

efferies and

than the ac

TRENGTH

rom CPTUs

rical cone faoverburden

own that th

present an u

Nkt value of

ex (Ic) of gr

E DENSITY

as been de

ation was d

ons. The s

artz. It is no

gure 4.3.

this report

rmula for ca

Geotec

and Ic is de

.

d Davies, 1

tual SPT te

H

s using cor

actor stress.

e cone fac

upper bound

f 20. This

reater than 2

Y (Dr)

erived using

derived from

sands were

oted that fie

is calculate

alculating re

chnical Pa

efined as:

. (Lunn

991) that th

est due to po

rrected con

(Lunne

ctor Nkt vari

d su value w

report only

2.60.

g a method

m five pred

normally c

eld cases ar

ed on soil w

elative dens

arameters

e et al., 199

his method

oor repeata

e resistanc

et al., 1981

es between

with an Nkt v

y presents

by Jamiolk

dominantly

consolidated

re likely to s

with a soil be

ity (Dr) is:

′ .

s

97)

provides a

ability of the

ce is made

)

n 11 and 3

value of 15

this data o

kowski et al

silica sand

d, un-ceme

show more

ehaviour typ

a better est

SPT.

from the f

30 with an

and a lowe

on soils wit

l., 1985 (se

ds under co

ented, un-ag

variability t

pe index (Ir

Page 15

imate of

following

average

er bound

th a soil

ee figure

ontrolled

ged and

han that

r) of less

5 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

F

4.5

Friction

looking

cement

The cor

than 2.6

Figur

ol, Norwic

60190R001

Figure 4.3: C

FRICTION

angle is de

at calibrat

ted quartz s

rrelation in

60.

re 4.6: Peak

ch

1RW

Correlation b

N ANGLE

erived using

ion test da

sand. The f

′

this report

friction angle

Geotec

etween qc an

g the Rober

ta (see figu

formula for p

′

is calculate

e of clean qu

chnical Pa

nd relative de

rtson and C

ure 4.6). T

peak Φ’ fro

. .

ed on soil w

uartz sands fr

1983).

arameters

ensity (after

ampanella

The correlat

m CPTU is:

with a soil be

rom CPTU (a

s

Jamiolkowsk

(1983) meth

tion is base

:

′

ehaviour typ

after Roberts

ki et al., 1985

hod from th

ed on un-a

pe index (Ic

son & Campa

Page 16

5)

heir work

aged un-

c) of less

anella,

6 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

4.6

It is po

(1995) d

Roberts

type ind

4.7

4.7.1

The 1-D

terms o

Much w

and Ga

In this r

soils wi

ol, Norwic

60190R001

FINES CO

ssible to es

demonstrat

Figure

son and Fe

dex (Ic), this

.

CONSTRA

Fine Grain

D constraine

of a coefficie

work has be

ardner (1975

report a mo

th a soil typ

ch

1RW

ONTENT (Fstimate fine

ted how fric

e 4.7: Variatio

ear (1995) u

s was later u

.

3

AINED MO

ned

ed modulus

ent, αm, and

een carried

5), Sennese

re general r

pe index (Ic)

Geotec

FC)

es content f

tion ratio (R

on of fines co

used this re

updated in 1

1.26

3.5

ODULUS

s, M, as me

d cone resis

out looking

et et al., (19

relationship

) of more tha

chnical Pa

from the fri

Rf) varies wi

ontent with f

elationship

1998. This

asured in a

stance (Lunn

∝

g at direct r

989) and Jo

p is used pro

an 2.60.

8.25

arameters

ction ratio

th fines con

riction ratio (

and integra

relationship

%

%

an oedomete

ne et al., 19

1

relationship

nes and Ru

oposed by K

s

of sandy so

ntent (FC) (s

(Suzuki et al.

ated it with

p is shown

%

% .

%

er test, has

997).

ps between

ust (1995).

Kulhawy an

oils. Suzuk

see figure 4

., 1995)

the soil be

below:

.

been expre

M and qc,

nd Mayne (1

Page 17

ki et al.,

4.7)

ehaviour

essed in

Mitchell

1990) on

7 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

This rel

the wor

Figu

4.7.2

For coa

figure 4

recomm

predom

The cor

than 2.6

Figure

(1983).

ol, Norwic

60190R001

lationship w

rld (see figu

ure 4.8: Gen

Coarse Gr

arse graine

4.5). This

mended tha

minantly silic

rrelation in t

60. The co

Mo =

M

4.9: Table

ch

1RW

was derived

re 4.8)

neral relation

rained

ed soils a c

correlation

at an estima

ca sands.

this report i

rrelation is s

Mo = 4qc

= 2qc + 20 (M

Mo = 120 MPa

showing the

Geotec

from lookin

ship betwee

Kulhaw

correlation b

is based

ate of Mo fo

s calculated

shown belo

MPa)

a

e constraine

chnical Pa

ng at result

n constraine

wy and Mayne

by Lunne a

on a revie

or normally

d on soil wi

ow:

d modulus

arameters

ts from vari

ed modulus a

e, 1990)

and Christo

w of availa

consolidate

th a soils b

for

correlation f

s

ous differen

and net cone

ophersen (1

able calibra

ed un-aged

ehaviour ty

for qc < 10

10MPa < qc

for qc > 50

from Lunne

nt soil types

resistance (

1983) is us

ation test d

d and un-ce

ype index (Ir

MPa

< 50 MPa

MPa

and Christo

Page 18

s across

(from

sed )see

ata and

emented

r) of less

ophersen

8 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

5.0 R

British S

In

el

Houlsby

Jefferie

D

Jones,

em

P

S

Kulhaw

de

Lord, J

C

Lunne,

S

S

Lunne,

of

T

Lunne,

G

Mitchel

ch

M

S

Roberts

G

ol, Norwic

60190R001

REFEREN

Standard BS

nternational

lectrical con

y, G.T. and

Internationa

Balkema P

es, M.G. an

Discussion.

G.A. and

mbankment

enetration

ociety

wy, F.H. and

esign”. Ele

.A., Clayton

C574.

T. And K

ession at t

t. Louis, 76

T. And Ch

ffshore san

exas, Pape

T., Robert

Geotechnica

l, J.K. an

haracteristic

Measuremen

ociety of En

son, P.K. (

Geotechnica

ch

1RW

NCES

S5930:1999

Standard.

ne and piez

Teh, C. I.

al Sympos

ub., Rotterd

nd Davies,

Canadian G

d Rust, E.

ts on alluv

Testing, C

d Mayne, P

ctric Power

n, C.R.I., an

leven, A. (

he ASCE N

-107, Amer

hristopherse

nds”. Proce

er No. 4464.

tson, P. K

al Practice”.

d Gardner

cs”. Proc

nts os Soil

ngineers (A

(1990) “Soi

al Journal, 2

9, “Code of

Geotechn

zocone pene

(1998). “An

ium on Pe

dam.

M.P. (1991

Geotechnic

. (1995) “

ium”. Proc

PT ’95, Lin

.H. (1990)

r Research

nd Mortimo

(1981) “Ro

National Co

rican Societ

en, H.P. (1

eedings of

.

. And Pow

Blackie.

r, W.S. (1

ceedings o

Properties

ASCE).

il classifica

27(1), 151.

Referenc

practice fo

ical Investig

etration test

nalysis of th

enetration T

) “Soil clas

al Journal,

“Piezocone

ceedings of

nköping, Sw

“Manual on

Institute, EP

re, R.N. (20

le of CPT

onvention: C

ty of Engine

983) “Inter

the Offsho

well, J. J. M

975) “In

of the AS

s, Raleigh,

ation using

ces

r site invest

gation and

t. ISO/ FDI

he piezocon

Testing, IS

ssification b

28(1), 173-

settlemen

f the Intern

weden, 2, 5

n estimating

PRI, Augus

002) “Engin

in North S

Cone Pene

eers (ASCE

pretation o

ore Techno

M. (1997)

situ meas

CE Specia

North Car

the cone

tigations”. B

testing- fie

S 22476-1.

ne in clay”.

SOPT-1, Or

by the cone

6.

nt predictio

national Sy

501-8, Swe

g soil prope

t, 1990.

neering in c

Sea founda

etration Tes

).

f cone pen

ology confer

“Cone Pen

urement o

alty Confer

rolina, 2, 2

penetration

BSI, 1999.

eld testing –

Proceeding

rlando, 2,

e penetratio

on paramet

mposium o

edish Geote

erties for fou

chalk”. Ciri

ation engin

sting and M

netrometer

rence, Rich

netration te

of volume

rence on

279-345, A

n test”. C

Page 19

– part 1:

gs of the

777-83,

on test”:

ters for

on Cone

echnical

undation

a Guide

neering”.

Materials,

data for

hardson,

esting in

change

In Situ

American

anadian

9 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

Roberts

1

Roberts

‘9

Le

Roberts

th

Roberts

co

T

E

Sennes

pe

M

S

Sennes

pi

Suzuki,

an

In

E

Topp, G

co

58

Waltham

P

Houlsby

In

B

Power

en

P

ol, Norwic

60190R001

son, P.K. an

: Sand”. Ca

son, P.K. an

95”. First Int

ecture, Nov

son, P.K. an

he cone pen

son, P.K., C

one data”. P

ests in G

ngineers (A

set K. And

enetration

Measuremen

TP 883, 41

set, K., San

iezocone te

Y., Tokima

nd dynamc

nternational

ngineering

G.C., Davis

ontent: Mea

82.

m, A.C., 2

rofessional

y, G.T. and

nternational

alkema Pub

P.T. (1982

ngineering

enetration t

ch

1RW

nd Campan

anadian Ge

nd Fear, C.

ternational C

vember, 199

nd Wride (F

netration tes

Campanella

Proceeding

eotechnica

ACE).

Janbu, N.

tests. Stre

nts”. Symp

-54.

ndven, R. A

ests”. Trans

atsu, K., Ta

c propertie

Conferen

and Soil Dy

, J.L. and A

asurements

2002. “Fou

, 2002.

Teh, C. I.

Symposiu

b., Rotterda

2) “The use

properties

testing, ESO

nella, R.G. (

eotechnical

E. (1995) “L

Conference

95.

Fear), C.E.

st”. Can. G

a, R.G., Gil

s of the AS

l Engineer

(1985) “Sh

ength Test

posium, San

And Janbu,

sportation R

aya, Y. And

es of in s

nce on R

ynamics, St

Anna, A.P. (

s in coaxial

undations o

(1998). “An

um on Pen

am.

e of electro

of chalk”.

OPT-II, Ams

Referenc

1983) “Inte

Journal, 20

Liquefaction

e on Earthq

(1998) “Eva

eotech. J. V

lespie, D. A

SCE Specia

ring, Black

hear strengt

ting of Mar

n Diego, 19

N. (1989)

Research Re

d Kubota, Y

itu frozen

Recent Ad

t. Louis, 1, 2

(1980). “Ele

l transmiss

of Enginee

nalysis of th

netration T

nic cone p

Proceeding

sterdam, 2,

ces

rpretation o

(4), 718-33

n of sands a

uake Geote

aluating cyc

Vol. 35.

And Greig,

alty Confere

ksburg, 126

th paramete

rine Sedim

984, ASTM

“The evalu

ecord, No.

Y. (1995) “C

samples”.

dvances in

249-52, Uni

ectromagne

ion lines”.

ering Geolo

he piezocon

Testing, ISO

penetromete

gs of the 2

769-74, Ba

of cone pene

.

and its eval

echnical En

clic liquefac

J (1986) “

ence In Situ

63-80, Am

ers obtaine

ents; Labo

Special tec

uation of so

1235, 24-37

Correlation

Proceed

n Geotech

iversity of M

etic determi

Water Res

ogy”. Black

ne in clay”.

OPT-1, Or

er in the de

2nd Europe

alkema Pub

etrometer te

luation. IS

ngineering, K

ction potenti

“Use of pie

’86: Use o

merican Soc

ed from sta

oratory and

chnical pub

oil paramete

7.

between C

ings of th

hnical Ear

Missouri Rol

nation of so

iur. Res., 1

kie Academ

Proceeding

rlando, 2,

etermination

an Sympos

b., Rotterda

Page 20

est: Part

TOKYO

Keynote

ial using

zometer

of In Situ

ciety of

tic cone

In Situ

blication,

ers from

PT data

e Third

rthquake

lla.

oil water

16, 574-

mic and

gs of the

777-83,

n of the

sium on

m

0 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

ol, Norwic

60190R001

Cone Da

Cone Ca

CPT Proj

14 Tonne

CPT Soil

Explanat

ch

1RW

D

atasheet

alibration Ce

ject Summa

e Track Mo

l Descriptio

tion of Symb

AP

GENERA

LIST

escription

ertificate S1

ary Sheet

unted Rig D

n Table

bols

Appendix

PPENDIX

AL INFOR

T OF FIGU

5CFIP.103

Datasheet

x A

X A

RMATION

RES

2

Pages Inc

1

1

1

1

1

1

cluded

Page 211 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

ol, Norwic

60190R001

ch

1RW

CON

Appendix

E DATASH

x A

HEET

Page 222 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

ol, Norwic

60190R001

C

ch

1RW

CONE CALLIBRATION

Appendix

N CERTIF

x A

ICATE S15CFIP.10332

Page 233 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

HO

CPT H

CPT

CPT

CPT

CPT

CPT 2

CPT

CPT

CPT

CPT

CPT

CPT

CPT

CPT

CPT

ol, Norwic

60190R001

OLE F

HP 203

102

202

203

204

204A

205

206

207

208

209

210

211

212

213

ch

1RW

CP

inal Depth oTest (m)

5.00

6.80

5.20

5.00

5.00

5.10

5.02

5.89

5.00

5.00

9.89

5.00

5.00

5.00

6.51

PT PROJE

of Date

23/03

23/03

23/03

23/03

23/03

23/03

23/03

23/03

23/03

23/03

23/03

23/03

23/03

23/03

23/03

Appendix

ECT SUMM

of Test

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

3/2016

x A

MARY SHE

Cone Used

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

S15CFIP.103

EET

d

32 Test co

32 Test ref

32 Test co

32 Test co

32 Test co

32 Test co

32 Test co

32 Test co

32 Test co

32 Test co

32 Test ref

32 Test co

32 Test co

32 Test co

32 Test co

Test Rem

ompleted at t

fused on tot

ompleted at t

ompleted at t

ompleted at t

ompleted at t

ompleted at t

ompleted at t

ompleted at t

ompleted at t

fused on tot

ompleted at t

ompleted at t

ompleted at t

ompleted at t

Page 24

marks

target depth

al pressure.

target depth

target depth

target depth

target depth

target depth

target depth

target depth

target depth

al pressure.

target depth

target depth

target depth

target depth

4 of 119

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

ol, Norwic

60190R001

14

ch

1RW

TONNE TTRACK MO

Appendix

OUNTED C

x A

CPT RIG DDATA SHEEET

Page 255 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

GRANU

COHES

Very So

Soft

Firm

Stiff

Very stif

Hard

(from W

ol, Norwic

60190R001

ULAR SOILS

Ver

Loo

Me

Den

Ver

IVE SOILS (

Descriptio

ft

ff

altham, 2002

ch

1RW

S (Sands and

Descr

ry Loose

ose

dium Dense

nse

ry Dense

(Clays)

on

2)

SOIL DES

d Gravels)

ription

Cone R

Appendix

SCRIPTION

Con

Resistance (

(MPa)

0 – 0.3

0.3 – 0.5

0.5 – 1.0

1.0 – 2.0

2.0-4.0

>4.0

x A

N TABLES

ne Resistanc

0 –

2 –

4 – 1

12 –

>20

(qc) E

S

ce (qc) (MPa

2

4

12

20

0

Equivalent S(k

0

20

40

75 –

150

>

a)

Su value fromkPa)

–20

– 40

– 75

– 150

0-300

300

Page 26

m qc

6 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

ol, Norwic

60190R001

a

e

Nk

ch

1RW

E

a (α) = area

Ac = proj

An = cros

Bq = pore

ch = horiz

Dr =

relat

e = void

eo = initia

emax = max

emin = mini

fs = unit

FC = fines

Ic = soil

Ir = rigid

mv = coef

M = cons

N = no.

or Nkt cone

N60 = SPT

qc = mea

qe = effec

qn = net c

qt = corr

Qt = norm

Rf = fricti

su = und

t50 = time

u0 = in si

u1 = pore

u2 = pore

∆u = mea

φ = tota

EXPLANA

a ratio of the

ected area o

ss-sectional a

e pressure pa

zontal coeffic

tive density

d ratio

al void ratio

ximum void r

imum void ra

sleeve frictio

s content

behaviour ty

dity index = G

fficient of vol

strained defo

Of blows in t

e factor

T energy ratio

asured cone

ctive cone re

cone resista

rected cone r

malised cone

ion ratio (=(fs

rained shear

e for 50% dis

itu pore pres

e pressure m

e pressure m

asured pore w

l friction ratio

Appendix

ATION OF

cone (=An/A

of the cone

area of shaft

arameter (=(

cient of cons

atio

atio

on

ype index

G/su

lume change

ormation mod

the SPT

o

resistance

esistance = (

nce = (qt-σvo

resistance =

e resistance

fs/qc)×100%)

r strength

ssipation of m

sure

measured on

measured beh

water pressu

o

x A

SYMBOLS

Ac)

t

(u2-u0)/(qt-σvo

solidation

e

dulus

qt-u2)

o)

qc+(1-a)u2

= (qt-σvo)/σ’vo

measured po

the cone

hind the cone

ure

S

o))

o

re pressure

e

Page 277 of 119

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

CPTEstiCPTMea

ol, Norwic

60190R001

T HP 203 -mated Soil

T HP 203 -asured Pore

ch

1RW

Desc

- CPT 213 Behaviour

- CPT 213 e Pressure

AP

CP

LIST

cription

(Printed onType Plot (Printed onPlot

Appendix

PPENDIX

PT RESUL

T OF FIGU

n Form CPT

n Form CPT

x B

X B

LTS

RES

T0001)

T0002)

Pages Included

15

15

Page 288 of 119

X Inclinometer Difference:

Y Inclinometer Difference:

Friction Ratio, Rf (%)

Estimated Soil Type

Inclination (degrees)

Sleeve Friction, fs (kPa) (based on Robertson et. al. (1986))

Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used: Checked By:

File Name:

Date of Plot:Sleeve Zero Pre:

Pore Pressure Zero Pre:

X Inclinometer Zero Pre:

Y Inclinometer Zero Pre: Form: CPT0001

Date of Test:PIEZO CONE PENETRATION TEST

De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values

Cone End Resistance, qc (MPa)

Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:

Pore Pressure Zero Post:

X Inclinometer Zero Post:

Y Inclinometer Zero Post:

Tip Zero Difference:

Sleeve Zero Difference:

insitusi.comPore Pressure Difference:


-

-

Test completed at target depth.

S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT HP 203

281 mV

255 mV

208 mV

2529 mV

2529 mV

272 mV

250 mV

229 mV

2495 mV

2495 mV

3 %

2 %

-9 %

1 %

1 %

CPT HP 203

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Soft becoming stiff clayey SILT to silty CLAY(5)

Loose to medium dense SAND to silty SAND(8)

Stiff to very stiff CLAY (3) with layers of sand

Dense locally very dense SAND (9) with a layerof clay

End of CPT at 5.00 m

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-

Test refused on total pressure.

S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 102

286 mV

251 mV

198 mV

2582 mV

2582 mV

286 mV

252 mV

208 mV

2515 mV

2515 mV

0 %

0 %

-5 %

3 %

3 %

CPT 102

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug

Very stiff to hard clayey SILT to silty CLAY (5)with layers of sand

Medium dense to dense SAND (9)

Very dense gravelly SAND to SAND (10)


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 202

286 mV

251 mV

203 mV

2377 mV

2377 mV

279 mV

246 mV

211 mV

2411 mV

2411 mV

3 %

2 %

-4 %

-1 %

-1 %

CPT 202

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug

Firm to stiff clayey SILT to silty CLAY (5) withlayers of sand

Dense locally very dense SAND (9) with a layerof clay


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 203

283 mV

252 mV

214 mV

2480 mV

2480 mV

283 mV

249 mV

204 mV

2496 mV

2496 mV

0 %

1 %

5 %

-1 %

-1 %

CPT 203

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug

Stiff to very stiff locally hard clayey SILT tosilty CLAY (5)

Dense locally very dense SAND (9)


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 204

282 mV

252 mV

229 mV

2373 mV

2373 mV

281 mV

249 mV

199 mV

2377 mV

2377 mV

0 %

1 %

15 %

0 %

0 %

CPT 204

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug

Soft to firm locally stiff clayey SILT to siltyCLAY (5)

Medium dense locally loose silty SAND tosandy SILT (7)

Very stiff clayey SILT to silty CLAY (5)



0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 204A

285 mV

252 mV

196 mV

2438 mV

2438 mV

285 mV

250 mV

218 mV

2484 mV

2484 mV

0 %

1 %

-10 %

-2 %

-2 %

CPT 204A

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug

Stiff becoming very stiff clayey SILT to siltyCLAY (5)

Loose to medium dense silty SAND to sandySILT (7) with layers of clay

Very stiff to hard clayey SILT to silty CLAY (5)



0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 205

280 mV

251 mV

205 mV

2548 mV

2548 mV

286 mV

252 mV

220 mV

2486 mV

2486 mV

-2 %

0 %

-7 %

2 %

2 %

CPT 205

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug

Medium dense locally dense SAND to siltySAND (8) with a layer of clay

Very stiff locally stiff clayey SILT to silty CLAY(5)

Medium dense SAND (9)


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 206

286 mV

256 mV

207 mV

2453 mV

2453 mV

283 mV

254 mV

203 mV

2466 mV

2466 mV

1 %

1 %

2 %

-1 %

-1 %

CPT 206

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug

Stiff to very stiff CLAY (3)

Stiff to very stiff clayey SILT to silty CLAY (5)with a layer of sand

Firm to stiff locally soft CLAY (3)

Medium dense silty SAND to sandy SILT (7)


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 207

277 mV

255 mV

244 mV

2515 mV

2515 mV

280 mV

255 mV

249 mV

2505 mV

2505 mV

-1 %

0 %

-2 %

0 %

0 %

CPT 207

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug

Stiff to very stiff clayey SILT to silty CLAY (5)with layers of sand

Medium dense to dense SAND (9) with a layerof clay

Very stiff clayey SILT to silty CLAY (5) withlayers of sand

Medium dense locally dense SAND (9)


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 208

280 mV

256 mV

240 mV

2613 mV

2613 mV

281 mV

254 mV

215 mV

2824 mV

2824 mV

0 %

1 %

12 %

-7 %

-7 %

CPT 208

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug

Firm to stiff CLAY (3) with a layer of sand

Medium dense locally loose SAND to siltySAND (8) with a layer of clay


Medium dense becoming dense SAND (9)


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 209

285 mV

256 mV

201 mV

2469 mV

2469 mV

280 mV

251 mV

232 mV

2432 mV

2432 mV

2 %

2 %

-13 %

2 %

2 %

CPT 209

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug

Loose to medium dense silty SAND to sandySILT (7) with a layer of clay

Very stiff locally stiff clayey SILT to silty CLAY(5)

Medium dense to dense locally very denseSAND (9)

Very stiff clayey SILT to silty CLAY (5)

Medium dense silty SAND to sandy SILT (7)

Medium dense becoming very dense gravellySAND to SAND (10)


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 210

280 mV

254 mV

244 mV

2741 mV

2741 mV

278 mV

254 mV

267 mV

2652 mV

2652 mV

1 %

0 %

-9 %

3 %

3 %

CPT 210

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug

Stiff to very stiff locally firm clayey SILT tosilty CLAY (5)

Dense to very dense locally medium denseSAND (9)


Medium dense becoming loose silty SAND tosandy SILT (7)

Stiff becoming firm CLAY (3)


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 211

282 mV

254 mV

232 mV

2529 mV

2529 mV

278 mV

253 mV

262 mV

2573 mV

2573 mV

1 %

0 %

-11 %

-2 %

-2 %

CPT 211

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug

Soft becoming stiff clayey SILT to silty CLAY(5)


Very stiff to hard clayey SILT to silty CLAY (5)with layers of sand

Stiff sandy SILT to clayey SILT (6)


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 212

285 mV

256 mV

202 mV

2609 mV

2609 mV

287 mV

258 mV

215 mV

2616 mV

2616 mV

-1 %

-1 %

-6 %

0 %

0 %

CPT 212

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug


Stiff to very stiff locally hard clayey SILT tosilty CLAY (5)

Medium dense locally dense SAND (9)


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15




Estimated Soil Type



Location:

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:






De

pth

(m

)

X Axis

Y Axis

Tip Zero Pre:

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

PCPT Zero Values


Tip Zero Post:

Sleeve Zero Post:








-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 213

282 mV

252 mV

208 mV

2555 mV

2555 mV

288 mV

258 mV

202 mV

2617 mV

2617 mV

-2 %

-2 %

3 %

-2 %

-2 %

CPT 213

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S

Pre dug


Stiff to very stiff locally soft CLAY (3)


Loose to medium dense silty SAND to sandySILT (7)

Stiff locally firm clayey SILT to silty CLAY (5)


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

-15 0 15

Corrected Cone End Resistance, qt (MPa) Pore Pressure Ratio, Bq

Estimated Soil TypeMeasured Pore Pressure, U2 (kPa)


Location:

Coordinates:

In Situ Pore Pressure, U0 (kPa)

Pore Pressure, U (kPa)

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0002INSITUSI.COM

Date of Test:

PIEZO CONE PENETRATION TEST

De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT HP 203 CPT HP 203

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 102 CPT 102

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 202 CPT 202

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 203 CPT 203

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 204 CPT 204

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 204A CPT 204A

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 205 CPT 205

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 206 CPT 206

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 207 CPT 207

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 208 CPT 208

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 209 CPT 209

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 210 CPT 210

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 211 CPT 211

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 212 CPT 212

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200




Location:

Coordinates:



Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:


Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 213 CPT 213

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

-1200 -900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900 1200

Delta

Wher

Repor

Simons

rry Schoo

rt No.: 116

CPT HPand N VCPT HPShear SCPT HFriction

CPT HP

ol, Norwic

60190R001

P 203 - CPValue P 203 - CPStrength P 203 - CP Angle

P 203 - CPT

ch

1RW

CPT DER

PT 213 (Prin

T 213 (Prin

PT 213 (Pr

T 213 (Print

AP

RIVED GEO

LIST

Descript

nted on For

nted on For

inted on Fo

ted on Form

Appendix

PPENDIX

OTECHNIC

T OF FIGU

tion

rm CPT000

rm CPT000

orm CPT00

m CPT0006

x C

X C

CAL PARA

RES

03) Soil Beh

4) Relative

005) Fines

) Constraine

AMETERS

haviour Typ

Density an

Content an

ed Modulus

S

PaInclu

pe 1

nd 1

nd 1

s 1

Page 59

ges uded

15

15

15

15

9 of 119

Derived SPT N Values

insitusi.com

Estimated Soil TypeSleeve Friction, fs (kPa) (based on Robertson et. al. (1986))

Location:

Soil Behaviour Type Ic

Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT HP 203 CPT HP 203

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:

Corrected Cone End Resistance, qt (MPa)


insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 102 CPT 102

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 202 CPT 202

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 203 CPT 203

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 204 CPT 204

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 204A CPT 204A

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 205 CPT 205

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 206 CPT 206

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 207 CPT 207

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 208 CPT 208

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 209 CPT 209

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 210 CPT 210

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 211 CPT 211

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 212 CPT 212

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



insitusi.com


Location:


Coordinates:

Remarks:

Ground Level:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 213 CPT 213

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 2 4

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0003

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:

Derived Relative Density, Dr (%)

Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Derived Shear Strength, Su Nkt = 15 (kPa)


Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT HP 203 CPT HP 203

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 20 40 60 80 100Derived Shear Strength, Su (kPa)


Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 102 CPT 102

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 202 CPT 202

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 203 CPT 203

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 204 CPT 204

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 204A CPT 204A

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 205 CPT 205

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 206 CPT 206

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 207 CPT 207

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 208 CPT 208

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 209 CPT 209

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 210 CPT 210

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 211 CPT 211

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 212 CPT 212

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


insitusi.com

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0004

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:



Job

Title

:



-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 213 CPT 213

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500


Job

Title

:

Corrected Cone End Resistance, qt (MPa) Soil Behaviour Type Index, Ic

Estimated Soil Type

Derived Fines Content, FC (%)


Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:

Derived Friction Angle, Phi (Degrees)

Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT HP 203 CPT HP 203

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 102 CPT 102

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 202 CPT 202

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 203 CPT 203

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 204 CPT 204

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 204A CPT 204A

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 205 CPT 205

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 206 CPT 206

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 207 CPT 207

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 208 CPT 208

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 209 CPT 209

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 210 CPT 210

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 211 CPT 211

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 212 CPT 212

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Job

Title

:


Estimated Soil Type



Location:

insitusi..com

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 213 CPT 213

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80C

lien

t:

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:

PEZO CONE PENETRATION TEST

De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:

Constrained Modulus M (1/mv) (MPa)

Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:

insitusi.comChecked By:

File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT HP 203 CPT HP 203

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 102 CPT 102

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 202 CPT 202

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 203 CPT 203

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 204 CPT 204

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 204A CPT 204A

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 205 CPT 205

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 206 CPT 206

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 207 CPT 207

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 208 CPT 208

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 209 CPT 209

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 210 CPT 210

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 211 CPT 211

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 212 CPT 212

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Coarse Grained

Date of Test:


De

pth

(m

)

Clie

nt:

Job

Title

:



Location:

Coordinates:


Remarks:

Ground Level:

Cone & Rig Used:


File Name:

Date of Plot:

Form: CPT0005

Fine Grained


-

-


S15-CFIP.1032 - CPT 006

23/03/2016

30/03/2016

1160190 - CPT 213 CPT 213

WH

ER

RY

SC

HO

OL

, NO

RW

ICH

DE

LTA

SIM

ON

S0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Appendix V

Chemtest Ltd.Depot RoadNewmarket

CB8 0ALTel: 01638 606070


Report No.: 16-07491-3

Initial Date of Issue: 08-Apr-2016 Date of Re-Issue: 08-Apr-2016

Client Delta Simons

Client Address: Unit 3, Chalk Hill HouseRosary RoadNorwichNorfolkNR1 1SZ

Contact(s): Malcolm Tolley

Project 15-1091.02 Wherry School, Norwich

Quotation No.: Q16-06067 Date Received: 01-Apr-2016

Order No.: Date Instructed: 01-Apr-2016

No. of Samples: 13

Turnaround (Wkdays): 5 Results Due: 07-Apr-2016

Date Approved: 08-Apr-2016 Subcon Results Due: 22-Apr-2016

Approved By:

Details: Glynn Harvey, Laboratory Manager

Amended Report

Page 1 of 17

Results - Soil

Client: Delta Simons 16-07491 16-07491 16-07491 16-07491 16-07491 16-07491 16-07491 16-07491 16-07491Quotation No.: Q16-06067 275013 275014 275015 275016 275017 275018 275019 275020 275021Order No.: HP207 HP208 HP209 HP210 HP202 HP213 HP220 HP214 HP215

ASP1 ASP1 ASP1 ASP1 ES1 ES1 ES1 ES2 ES2SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.50 0.500.10 0.15 0.10 0.05

23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016Determinand Accred. SOP Units LODACM Type U 2192 N/A - - - - -

Asbestos Identification U 2192 % 0.001 No Asbestos Detected

No Asbestos Detected




Moisture N 2030 % 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 17 16 13 16 15Soil Colour N 2040 N/A Black Black Black Black Brown Brown Brown Brown BrownOther Material N 2040 N/A Tarmac Tarmac Tarmac Tarmac Stones Stones Roots Stones StonesSoil Texture N 2040 N/A Sand Sand Sand Sand Sand Sand Sand Sand SandChromatogram (TPH) N N/A See Attached See Attached See Attached See AttachedDouble Ratio Plot N N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AArsenic M 2450 mg/kg 1.0 7.8 10 14 15 9.7Cadmium M 2450 mg/kg 0.10 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.24 0.16Copper M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 32 19 20 31 16Mercury M 2450 mg/kg 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.28 0.39 0.15Nickel M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 16 13 12 18 16Lead M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 35 64 86 110 61Selenium M 2450 mg/kg 0.20 0.28 0.23 0.25 0.36 0.26Zinc M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 61 58 60 91 54Chromium (Trivalent) N 2490 mg/kg 5.0 16 12 11 16 14Chromium (Hexavalent) N 2490 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Fuel Type N 2670 N/A Bitumen Bitumen Bitumen BitumenTPH >C6-C10 N 2670 mg/kg 1.0 [C] < 1.0 [C] < 1.0 [C] < 1.0 [C] < 1.0TPH >C10-C21 N 2670 mg/kg 1.0 [C] 20 [C] 58 [C] 19 [C] 15TPH >C21-C40 N 2670 mg/kg 1.0 [C] 310 [C] 430 [C] 420 [C] 470Total TPH >C6-C40 M 2670 mg/kg 10 [C] 320 [C] 500 [C] 460 [C] 480 < 10 < 10 14 < 10 < 10Naphthalene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Acenaphthylene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Acenaphthene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Fluorene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Phenanthrene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 1.3 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Anthracene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 0.49 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Fluoranthene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 1.3 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.39 < 0.10 0.65 0.98 0.57Pyrene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 1.8 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.39 < 0.10 0.65 1.0 0.56Benzo[a]anthracene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.54 < 0.10Chrysene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.70 < 0.10Benzo[b]fluoranthene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.84 < 0.10Benzo[k]fluoranthene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.35 < 0.10Benzo[a]pyrene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.49 < 0.10Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10

Project: 15-1091.02 Wherry School, Norwich

Top Depth (m):Bottom Depth (m):

Chemtest Job No.:Chemtest Sample ID.:

Client Sample Ref.:Client Sample ID.:

Sample Type:

Date Sampled:

Page 2 of 17

Results - Soil



23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016Determinand Accred. SOP Units LOD





Sample Type:

Date Sampled:

Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Benzo[g,h,i]perylene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Coronene N 2700 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Total Of 16 PAH's M 2700 mg/kg 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 4.9 < 2.0Total Of 17 PAH's N 2700 mg/kg 2.0 4.9 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0N-Nitrosodimethylamine N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Phenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502-Chlorophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Bis-(2-Chloroethyl)Ether N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.501,3-Dichlorobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.501,4-Dichlorobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.501,2-Dichlorobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502-Methylphenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Hexachloroethane N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.504-Methylphenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Nitrobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Isophorone N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502-Nitrophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502,4-Dimethylphenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502,4-Dichlorophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.501,2,4-Trichlorobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Naphthalene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.504-Chloroaniline N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Hexachlorobutadiene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.504-Chloro-3-Methylphenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502-Methylnaphthalene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.504-Nitrophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Hexachlorocyclopentadiene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502,4,6-Trichlorophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502,4,5-Trichlorophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502-Chloronaphthalene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502-Nitroaniline N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Acenaphthylene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Dimethylphthalate N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502,6-Dinitrotoluene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50

Page 3 of 17

Results - Soil



23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016Determinand Accred. SOP Units LOD





Sample Type:

Date Sampled:

Acenaphthene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.503-Nitroaniline N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Dibenzofuran N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.504-Chlorophenylphenylether N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502,4-Dinitrotoluene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Fluorene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Diethyl Phthalate N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.504-Nitroaniline N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.502-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Azobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.504-Bromophenylphenyl Ether N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Hexachlorobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Pentachlorophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Phenanthrene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Anthracene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Carbazole N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Di-N-Butyl Phthalate N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Fluoranthene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Pyrene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Butylbenzyl Phthalate N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Benzo[a]anthracene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Chrysene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Di-N-Octyl Phthalate N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Benzo[b]fluoranthene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Benzo[k]fluoranthene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Benzo[a]pyrene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Benzo[g,h,i]perylene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Interpretive Report N N/A See Below See Below See Below See Below

SVOC TIC N 2790 mg/kg N/A None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected

Page 4 of 17

Results - Soil

Client: Delta SimonsQuotation No.: Q16-06067Order No.:

Determinand Accred. SOP Units LODACM Type U 2192 N/A

Asbestos Identification U 2192 % 0.001

Moisture N 2030 % 0.020Soil Colour N 2040 N/AOther Material N 2040 N/ASoil Texture N 2040 N/AChromatogram (TPH) N N/ADouble Ratio Plot N N/AArsenic M 2450 mg/kg 1.0Cadmium M 2450 mg/kg 0.10Copper M 2450 mg/kg 0.50Mercury M 2450 mg/kg 0.10Nickel M 2450 mg/kg 0.50Lead M 2450 mg/kg 0.50Selenium M 2450 mg/kg 0.20Zinc M 2450 mg/kg 0.50Chromium (Trivalent) N 2490 mg/kg 5.0Chromium (Hexavalent) N 2490 mg/kg 0.50Fuel Type N 2670 N/ATPH >C6-C10 N 2670 mg/kg 1.0TPH >C10-C21 N 2670 mg/kg 1.0TPH >C21-C40 N 2670 mg/kg 1.0Total TPH >C6-C40 M 2670 mg/kg 10Naphthalene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Acenaphthylene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Acenaphthene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Fluorene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Phenanthrene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Anthracene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Fluoranthene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Pyrene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[a]anthracene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Chrysene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[b]fluoranthene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[k]fluoranthene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[a]pyrene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10





Sample Type:

Date Sampled:

16-07491 16-07491 16-07491 16-07491275022 275023 275024 275025HP216 CPT203 CPT210 CP213

ES1 ES2 ES2 ES2SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.20 0.40 0.50 0.60

23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016

- - - -No Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

Detected13 11 11 10

Brown Brown Brown BrownStones Stones Stones Stones

Clay Sand Sand Sand

11 6.2 9.2 260.20 0.13 0.22 0.5324 8.1 31 22

0.95 < 0.10 0.16 0.1615 14 14 36

180 13 63 170.25 0.22 0.26 0.4499 35 110 5613 13 13 28

< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50

< 10 < 10 43 < 10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 0.43 < 0.10 0.16< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.110.78 < 0.10 0.82 0.110.74 < 0.10 0.84 0.100.36 < 0.10 0.44 < 0.100.52 < 0.10 0.63 < 0.100.35 < 0.10 0.76 < 0.100.16 < 0.10 0.39 < 0.100.33 < 0.10 0.52 < 0.10

< 0.10 < 0.10 0.34 < 0.10

Page 5 of 17

Results - Soil


Determinand Accred. SOP Units LOD





Sample Type:

Date Sampled:

Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[g,h,i]perylene M 2700 mg/kg 0.10Coronene N 2700 mg/kg 0.10Total Of 16 PAH's M 2700 mg/kg 2.0Total Of 17 PAH's N 2700 mg/kg 2.0N-Nitrosodimethylamine N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Phenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.502-Chlorophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Bis-(2-Chloroethyl)Ether N 2790 mg/kg 0.501,3-Dichlorobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.501,4-Dichlorobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.501,2-Dichlorobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.502-Methylphenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Hexachloroethane N 2790 mg/kg 0.50N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine N 2790 mg/kg 0.504-Methylphenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Nitrobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Isophorone N 2790 mg/kg 0.502-Nitrophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.502,4-Dimethylphenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane N 2790 mg/kg 0.502,4-Dichlorophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.501,2,4-Trichlorobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Naphthalene N 2790 mg/kg 0.504-Chloroaniline N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Hexachlorobutadiene N 2790 mg/kg 0.504-Chloro-3-Methylphenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.502-Methylnaphthalene N 2790 mg/kg 0.504-Nitrophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Hexachlorocyclopentadiene N 2790 mg/kg 0.502,4,6-Trichlorophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.502,4,5-Trichlorophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.502-Chloronaphthalene N 2790 mg/kg 0.502-Nitroaniline N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Acenaphthylene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Dimethylphthalate N 2790 mg/kg 0.502,6-Dinitrotoluene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50

16-07491 16-07491 16-07491 16-07491275022 275023 275024 275025HP216 CPT203 CPT210 CP213


23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016

< 0.10 < 0.10 0.28 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 0.58 < 0.10

3.2 < 2.0 5.6 < 2.0

Page 6 of 17

Results - Soil


Determinand Accred. SOP Units LOD





Sample Type:

Date Sampled:

Acenaphthene N 2790 mg/kg 0.503-Nitroaniline N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Dibenzofuran N 2790 mg/kg 0.504-Chlorophenylphenylether N 2790 mg/kg 0.502,4-Dinitrotoluene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Fluorene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Diethyl Phthalate N 2790 mg/kg 0.504-Nitroaniline N 2790 mg/kg 0.502-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Azobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.504-Bromophenylphenyl Ether N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Hexachlorobenzene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Pentachlorophenol N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Phenanthrene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Anthracene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Carbazole N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Di-N-Butyl Phthalate N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Fluoranthene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Pyrene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Butylbenzyl Phthalate N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Benzo[a]anthracene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Chrysene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Di-N-Octyl Phthalate N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Benzo[b]fluoranthene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Benzo[k]fluoranthene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Benzo[a]pyrene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Benzo[g,h,i]perylene N 2790 mg/kg 0.50Interpretive Report N N/A

SVOC TIC N 2790 mg/kg N/A

16-07491 16-07491 16-07491 16-07491275022 275023 275024 275025HP216 CPT203 CPT210 CP213


23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016 23-Mar-2016

Page 7 of 17

TPH Chromatogram on Soil Sample: 275013

Page 8 of 17


Page 9 of 17


Page 10 of 17


Page 11 of 17

Results - Topsoil Report BS3882:2015

Chemtest Job No.: 16-07491Chemtest Sample ID.: 275017Client Sample Ref.: HP202Client Sample ID.: ES1Top Depth (m): 0.10Bottom Depth (m):Date Sampled: 23-Mar-2016Time Sampled:

Parameter Units ResultCompliant with Multipurpose Range? (Y/N)

Texture Acid Low F Calc.Clay content % 10Silt content % 21Sand content % 69

Soil texture class See Attached Chart Sandy Loam YES

Mass Loss on IgnitionClay 5-20% 3.0-20Clay 20-35% 5.0-20Stone Content % m/m>2mm 0-30 3.0 YES>20mm 0-10 < 0.020 YES>50mm 0 < 0.020 YESSoil pH value 5.5-8.5 7.3 YES NO YES NOCarbonate (Calcareous only) % < 0.10 NOElectrical Conductivity μS/cm If >3300 do ESP 2200 YESAvailable Nutrient ContentNitrogen % >0.15 0.19 YES YES YESExtractable phosphorus mg/l 16-140 5.9 NO NO YES NOExtractable potassium mg/l 121-1500 85 NO NO NOExtractable magnesium mg/l 51-600 29 NO NO NOCarbon : Nitrogen Ratio <20:1 11.5/1 YES YES YES YESExchangeable sodium % <15 0.53Available Calcium mg/l 1400Available Sodium mg/l 9.0Phytotoxic Contaminants (by soil pH) < 6.0 6.0-7.0 > 7.0Zinc (Nitric Acid extract) mg/kg <200 <200 <300 31 YESCopper (Nitric Acid extract) mg/kg <100 <135 <200 10 YESNickel (Nitric Acid extract) mg/kg <60 <75 <110 8.2 YESVisible Contaminants % mm >2mm <0.5 0.000 YES….. of which plastics <0.25 0.000 YES….. man-made sharps zero in 1kg 0.000 YES

Multipurpose Range

Compliant with Specific Purpose

Range? (Y/N)

3.7 YES YES YES YES

Page 12 of 17




Texture Acid Low F Calc.Clay content % 8.4Silt content % 21Sand content % 71

Soil texture class See Attached Chart Sandy Loam YES

Mass Loss on IgnitionClay 5-20% 3.0-20Clay 20-35% 5.0-20Stone Content % m/m>2mm 0-30 9.2 YES>20mm 0-10 < 0.020 YES>50mm 0 < 0.020 YESSoil pH value 5.5-8.5 6.1 YES NO YES NOCarbonate (Calcareous only) % < 0.10 NOElectrical Conductivity μS/cm If >3300 do ESP 2100 YESAvailable Nutrient ContentNitrogen % >0.15 0.11 NO NO NOExtractable phosphorus mg/l 16-140 3.6 NO NO YES NOExtractable potassium mg/l 121-1500 80 NO NO NOExtractable magnesium mg/l 51-600 39 NO NO NOCarbon : Nitrogen Ratio <20:1 18.6/1 YES YES YES YESExchangeable sodium % <15 1.1Available Calcium mg/l 1100Available Sodium mg/l 15Phytotoxic Contaminants (by soil pH) < 6.0 6.0-7.0 > 7.0Zinc (Nitric Acid extract) mg/kg <200 <200 <300 35 YESCopper (Nitric Acid extract) mg/kg <100 <135 <200 11 YESNickel (Nitric Acid extract) mg/kg <60 <75 <110 10 YESVisible Contaminants % mm >2mm <0.5 0.000 YES….. of which plastics <0.25 0.000 YES….. man-made sharps zero in 1kg 0.000 YES

Multipurpose Range


Range? (Y/N)

3.5 YES YES YES YES

Page 13 of 17




Texture Acid Low F Calc.Clay content % 6.8Silt content % 50Sand content % 43

Soil texture class See Attached ChartSandy

Silt Loam

YES

Mass Loss on IgnitionClay 5-20% 3.0-20Clay 20-35% 5.0-20Stone Content % m/m>2mm 0-30 7.1 YES>20mm 0-10 < 0.020 YES>50mm 0 < 0.020 YESSoil pH value 5.5-8.5 6.3 YES NO YES NOCarbonate (Calcareous only) % < 0.10 NOElectrical Conductivity μS/cm If >3300 do ESP 2100 YESAvailable Nutrient ContentNitrogen % >0.15 0.14 NO NO NOExtractable phosphorus mg/l 16-140 17 YES YES YES YESExtractable potassium mg/l 121-1500 32 NO NO NOExtractable magnesium mg/l 51-600 33 NO NO NOCarbon : Nitrogen Ratio <20:1 15.1/1 YES YES YES YESExchangeable sodium % <15 0.97Available Calcium mg/l 950Available Sodium mg/l 12Phytotoxic Contaminants (by soil pH) < 6.0 6.0-7.0 > 7.0Zinc (Nitric Acid extract) mg/kg <200 <200 <300 32 YESCopper (Nitric Acid extract) mg/kg <100 <135 <200 11 YESNickel (Nitric Acid extract) mg/kg <60 <75 <110 < 5.0 YESVisible Contaminants % mm >2mm <0.5 1.5 NO….. of which plastics <0.25 0.000 YES….. man-made sharps zero in 1kg 0.000 YES

Multipurpose Range


Range? (Y/N)

3.6 YES YES YES YES

Page 14 of 17

Topsoil:Texture Classification Chart

BS3882:2015

Permission to reproduce extracts from BS 3882:2015 is granted by BSI.British Standards can be obtained in PDF or hard copy formats from the BSI online shop: www.bsigroup.com/Shop or by

contacting BSI Customer Services for hardcopies only: Tel: +44 (0)20 8996 9001, Email: [email protected].

Page 15 of 17

DeviationsIn accordance with UKAS Policy on Deviating Samples TPS 63. Chemtest have a procedure to ensure 'upon receipt of each sample a

competent laboratory shall assess whether the sample is suitable with regard to the requested test(s)'. This policy and the respective

holding times applied, can be supplied upon request.The reason a sample is declared as deviating is detailed below. Where applicable

the analysis remains UKAS/MCERTs accredited but the results may be compromised.

Sample ID: Sample Ref: Sample ID: Sampled Date:

Deviation Code(s): Containers Received:

275013 HP207 ASP1 23-Mar-2016 C Plastic Tub 500g275014 HP208 ASP1 23-Mar-2016 C Plastic Tub 500g275015 HP209 ASP1 23-Mar-2016 C Plastic Tub 500g275016 HP210 ASP1 23-Mar-2016 C Plastic Tub 500g

Page 16 of 17

Report Information

KeyU UKAS accreditedM MCERTS and UKAS accreditedN UnaccreditedS This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is accredited for this analysis

SN This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is not accredited for this analysisT This analysis has been subcontracted to an unaccredited laboratory

I/S Insufficient SampleU/S Unsuitable SampleN/E not evaluated

< "less than"> "greater than"

Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditationThe results relate only to the items testedUncertainty of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request None of the results in this report have been recovery correctedAll results are expressed on a dry weight basisThe following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, PhenolsFor all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysisAll Asbestos testing is performed at our Coventry laboratory Issue numbers are sequential starting with 1 all subsequent reports are incremented by 1

Sample Deviation CodesA - Date of sampling not suppliedB - Sample age exceeds stability time (sampling to extraction)C - Sample not received in appropriate containersD - Broken Container

Sample Retention and DisposalAll soil samples will be retained for a period of 45 days from the date of receiptAll water samples will be retained for 14 days from the date of receiptCharges may apply to extended sample storage

If you require extended retention of samples, please email your requirements to: [email protected]

Page 17 of 17

mailto:[email protected]

Chemtest Ltd.Depot RoadNewmarket

CB8 0ALTel: 01638 606070


Report No.: 16-07498-2

Initial Date of Issue: 11-Apr-2016 Date of Re-Issue: 12-Apr-2016

Client Delta Simons

Client Address: 3 Henley Office ParkDoddington RoadLincolnLincolnshireLN6 3QR

Contact(s): Malcolm Tolley

Project 15-1091.02 Wherry School, Norwich

Quotation No.: Q16-06067 Date Received: 01-Apr-2016

Order No.: Date Instructed: 01-Apr-2016

No. of Samples: 4

Turnaround (Wkdays): 7 Results Due: 11-Apr-2016

Date Approved: 11-Apr-2016

Approved By:

Details: Robert Monk, Technical Development Chemist

Amended Report

Page 1 of 6

Results - 2 Stage WAC

Chemtest Job No: Chemtest Sample ID: LimitsSample Ref: Stable, Non-Sample ID: reactive HazardousTop Depth(m): Inert Waste hazardous WasteBottom Depth(m): Landfill waste in non- LandfillSampling Date: hazardousDeterminand SOP Accred. Units Landfill Total Organic Carbon 2625 U % 8.3 3 5 6Loss On Ignition 2610 U % 8.2 -- -- 10Total BTEX 6 -- --Total PCBs (7 congeners) 1 -- --TPH Total WAC (Mineral Oil) 500 -- --Total (of 17) PAHs 100 -- --pH -- >6 --Acid Neutralisation Capacity 2015 N mol/kg 0.014 -- To evaluate To evaluateEluate Analysis 2:1 8:1 2:1 Cumulative

mg/l mg/l mg/kg mg/kg 10:1Arsenic 1450 U 0.0017 0.0011 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.5 2 25Barium 1450 U 0.037 0.049 < 0.50 < 0.50 20 100 300Cadmium 1450 U < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.04 1 5Chromium 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.5 10 70Copper 1450 U 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 2 50 100Mercury 1450 U < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.0010 < 0.0050 0.01 0.2 2Molybdenum 1450 U 0.0024 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.5 10 30Nickel 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.4 10 40Lead 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.5 10 50Antimony 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.06 0.7 5Selenium 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.1 0.5 7Zinc 1450 U 0.0033 < 0.0010 < 0.50 < 0.50 4 50 200Chloride 1220 U 9.8 1.2 20 26 800 15000 25000Fluoride 1220 U 0.38 0.097 < 1.0 1.4 10 150 500Sulphate 1220 U 56 6.6 110 140 1000 20000 50000Total Dissolved Solids 1020 N 150 68 300 810 4000 60000 100000Phenol Index 1920 U < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.30 < 0.50 1 - -Dissolved Organic Carbon 1610 U 17 34 < 50 310 500 800 1000

Soild InformationDry mass of test portion/kg 0.175 0.350Moisture (%) < 0.020 1.400

0.275

Leachant volume 1st extract/lLeachant volume 2nd extract/l

Eluant recovered from 1st extract/l

0.000.1023-Mar-2016

Limit values for compliance leaching testusing BS EN 12457-3 at L/S 10 l/kg

Leachate Test Information

Project: 15-1091.02 Wherry School, Norwich16-07498 Landflll Waste Acceptance Criteria275033HP207ASP1

Page 2 of 6


Chemtest Job No: Chemtest Sample ID: LimitsSample Ref: Stable, Non-Sample ID: reactive HazardousTop Depth(m): Inert Waste hazardous WasteBottom Depth(m): Landfill waste in non- LandfillSampling Date: hazardousDeterminand SOP Accred. Units Landfill Total Organic Carbon 2625 U % 0.67 3 5 6Loss On Ignition 2610 U % 4.3 -- -- 10Total BTEX 2760 U mg/kg < 0.010 6 -- --Total PCBs (7 Congeners) 2815 U mg/kg < 0.10 1 -- --TPH Total WAC (Mineral Oil) 2670 U mg/kg < 10 500 -- --Total (Of 17) PAH's 2700 N mg/kg < 2.0 100 -- --pH 2010 U 7.2 -- >6 --Acid Neutralisation Capacity 2015 N mol/kg 0.0090 -- To evaluate To evaluateEluate Analysis 2:1 8:1 2:1 Cumulative

mg/l mg/l mg/kg mg/kg 10:1Arsenic 1450 U 0.0013 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.5 2 25Barium 1450 U 0.016 0.0092 < 0.50 < 0.50 20 100 300Cadmium 1450 U < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.04 1 5Chromium 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.5 10 70Copper 1450 U 0.0035 0.0018 < 0.050 < 0.050 2 50 100Mercury 1450 U < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.0010 < 0.0050 0.01 0.2 2Molybdenum 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.5 10 30Nickel 1450 U 0.0017 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.4 10 40Lead 1450 U 0.0017 0.0045 < 0.010 0.043 0.5 10 50Antimony 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.06 0.7 5Selenium 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.1 0.5 7Zinc 1450 U 0.0042 0.0066 < 0.50 < 0.50 4 50 200Chloride 1220 U 8.9 3.9 18 43 800 15000 25000Fluoride 1220 U 0.24 0.19 < 1.0 1.9 10 150 500Sulphate 1220 U 12 5.2 24 58 1000 20000 50000Total Dissolved Solids 1020 N 120 41 240 480 4000 60000 100000Phenol Index 1920 U < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.30 < 0.50 1 - -Dissolved Organic Carbon 1610 U 10 5.5 < 50 59 500 800 1000

Soild InformationDry mass of test portion/kg 0.175 0.327Moisture (%) 12 1.400

0.150



0.40

23-Mar-2016



Project: 15-1091.02 Wherry School, Norwich16-07498 Landflll Waste Acceptance Criteria275034CPT203ES2

Page 3 of 6


Chemtest Job No: Chemtest Sample ID: LimitsSample Ref: Stable, Non-Sample ID: reactive HazardousTop Depth(m): Inert Waste hazardous WasteBottom Depth(m): Landfill waste in non- LandfillSampling Date: hazardousDeterminand SOP Accred. Units Landfill Total Organic Carbon 2625 U % 1.2 3 5 6Loss On Ignition 2610 U % 2.3 -- -- 10Total BTEX 2760 U mg/kg < 0.010 6 -- --Total PCBs (7 Congeners) 2815 U mg/kg < 0.10 1 -- --TPH Total WAC (Mineral Oil) 2670 U mg/kg 55 500 -- --Total (Of 17) PAH's 2700 N mg/kg 10 100 -- --pH 2010 U 7.6 -- >6 --Acid Neutralisation Capacity 2015 N mol/kg 0.0080 -- To evaluate To evaluateEluate Analysis 2:1 8:1 2:1 Cumulative

mg/l mg/l mg/kg mg/kg 10:1Arsenic 1450 U 0.0024 0.0040 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.5 2 25Barium 1450 U 0.014 0.022 < 0.50 < 0.50 20 100 300Cadmium 1450 U < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.04 1 5Chromium 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.5 10 70Copper 1450 U 0.0043 0.013 < 0.050 < 0.050 2 50 100Mercury 1450 U < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.0010 < 0.0050 0.01 0.2 2Molybdenum 1450 U 0.0054 0.0027 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.5 10 30Nickel 1450 U < 0.0010 0.0011 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.4 10 40Lead 1450 U < 0.0010 0.023 < 0.010 0.21 0.5 10 50Antimony 1450 U 0.0067 0.0035 0.013 0.038 0.06 0.7 5Selenium 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.1 0.5 7Zinc 1450 U 0.0020 0.031 < 0.50 < 0.50 4 50 200Chloride 1220 U 1.9 < 1.0 < 10 < 10 800 15000 25000Fluoride 1220 U 0.68 0.43 1.4 4.5 10 150 500Sulphate 1220 U 12 3.2 24 39 1000 20000 50000Total Dissolved Solids 1020 N 110 57 220 610 4000 60000 100000Phenol Index 1920 U < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.30 < 0.50 1 - -Dissolved Organic Carbon 1610 U 8.7 6.9 < 50 70 500 800 1000

Soild InformationDry mass of test portion/kg 0.175 0.329Moisture (%) 11 1.400

0.145



0.50

23-Mar-2016




Page 4 of 6


Chemtest Job No: Chemtest Sample ID: LimitsSample Ref: Stable, Non-Sample ID: reactive HazardousTop Depth(m): Inert Waste hazardous WasteBottom Depth(m): Landfill waste in non- LandfillSampling Date: hazardousDeterminand SOP Accred. Units Landfill Total Organic Carbon 2625 U % 0.28 3 5 6Loss On Ignition 2610 U % 2.7 -- -- 10Total BTEX 2760 U mg/kg < 0.010 6 -- --Total PCBs (7 Congeners) 2815 U mg/kg < 0.10 1 -- --TPH Total WAC (Mineral Oil) 2670 U mg/kg < 10 500 -- --Total (Of 17) PAH's 2700 N mg/kg < 2.0 100 -- --pH 2010 U 7.7 -- >6 --Acid Neutralisation Capacity 2015 N mol/kg < 0.0020 -- To evaluate To evaluateEluate Analysis 2:1 8:1 2:1 Cumulative

mg/l mg/l mg/kg mg/kg 10:1Arsenic 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.5 2 25Barium 1450 U 0.0051 0.011 < 0.50 < 0.50 20 100 300Cadmium 1450 U < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.04 1 5Chromium 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.5 10 70Copper 1450 U 0.0014 0.0015 < 0.050 < 0.050 2 50 100Mercury 1450 U < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.0010 < 0.0050 0.01 0.2 2Molybdenum 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.5 10 30Nickel 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.4 10 40Lead 1450 U < 0.0010 0.0016 < 0.010 0.015 0.5 10 50Antimony 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.06 0.7 5Selenium 1450 U < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.1 0.5 7Zinc 1450 U < 0.0010 0.0058 < 0.50 < 0.50 4 50 200Chloride 1220 U 1.0 < 1.0 < 10 < 10 800 15000 25000Fluoride 1220 U 0.24 0.22 < 1.0 2.2 10 150 500Sulphate 1220 U < 1.0 < 1.0 < 10 < 10 1000 20000 50000Total Dissolved Solids 1020 N 46 23 92 240 4000 60000 100000Phenol Index 1920 U < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.30 < 0.50 1 - -Dissolved Organic Carbon 1610 U 5.6 5.1 < 50 51 500 800 1000

Soild InformationDry mass of test portion/kg 0.175 0.331Moisture (%) 9.8 1.400

0.112



0.60

23-Mar-2016




Page 5 of 6

Report Information

KeyU UKAS accreditedM MCERTS and UKAS accreditedN UnaccreditedS This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is accredited for this analysis

SN This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is not accredited for this analysisT This analysis has been subcontracted to an unaccredited laboratory

I/S Insufficient SampleU/S Unsuitable SampleN/E not evaluated

< "less than"> "greater than"

Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditationThe results relate only to the items testedUncertainty of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request None of the results in this report have been recovery correctedAll results are expressed on a dry weight basisThe following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, PhenolsFor all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysisAll Asbestos testing is performed at our Coventry laboratory Issue numbers are sequential starting with 1 all subsequent reports are incremented by 1

Sample Deviation CodesA - Date of sampling not suppliedB - Sample age exceeds stability time (sampling to extraction)C - Sample not received in appropriate containersD - Broken Container

Sample Retention and DisposalAll soil samples will be retained for a period of 45 days from the date of receiptAll water samples will be retained for 14 days from the date of receiptCharges may apply to extended sample storage

If you require extended retention of samples, please email your requirements to: [email protected]

Page 6 of 6

mailto:[email protected]

Appendix VI

Delta-Simons Adopted Human Health Generic Assessment Criteria

For

Residential End Use with Consumption of Home Grown Produce

Version 4.2 – September 2015

Collation of Human Health SGVs and Soil Screening Values – Residential with consumption of home grown produce ___________________________________________________________________________________

Document No: D117 Version:4.1 Issue Date: 28/01/15 Author: J Rhoades Authorised by: R Griffiths Page: 2 of 11 © Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Limited. No part of this document may be reproduced unless prior written permission has been granted.

Guidance Notes – Using Human Health Soil Screening Values A tiered risk assessment approach is used for the assessment of soil analysis results considering the ‘pollutant linkages’ on the basis of a ‘source-pathway-receptor’ relationship. The following tables present conservative Tier 1 generic screening assessment criteria (GAC) used by Delta-Simons to provide an initial assessment of risk to Human Health in the context of the proposed redevelopment of the Site. GACs are intended to assess:

∆ Chronic (long-term) on-site exposure risk to contaminants in the soil to future users and occupiers of the Site.

∆ Concentrations below the GAC considered tolerable or to pose a minimal risk to human health, or low risk in relation to the Category 4 Screening Levels (C4SLs).

GACs are not relevant for assessing:

∆ Acute (short-term) exposure risks (e.g. construction workers during development); ∆ Non-human receptors such as controlled waters, ecosystems, buildings and services,

animals, domestic pets or plants; ∆ Aesthetic issues which may render a soil unsuitable for use such as odour or colour; ∆ GACs do not take account of other non-soil based sources of contamination such as

contamination in groundwater or surface waters; and ∆ GACs are not suitable for assessing whether a soil provides a suitable growing medium

for crops or plants. Exceedences of Generic Assessment Criteria An exceedence of a GAC:

∆ Is not an indicator of a significant risk to human health; ∆ Is an indication that the contaminant may pose a possibility harm to human health and,

therefore, further consideration is required. In assessing the significance of an exceedence consideration should be given to:

∆ The nature of the contaminant (e.g. volatile or non-volatile contaminants) ∆ Site design and potential exposure pathways (e.g. hard cover, buildings, landscaping) ∆ The distribution of exceedences (widespread or localised, numerous or few

exceedences – NB: Consider data limitations – site coverage and gaps in data. ∆ The margin of the exceedence(s); ∆ The duration and frequency of exposure; and ∆ Any other site specific factors.

Generic Assessment Criteria used by Delta-Simons In the absence of a complete regulatory set of screening values derived using the CLEA Framework, Delta-Simons screening values are based on the following:

The current Soil Guidance Values (SGVs) published by the EA; Category 4 Screening Levels (C4SLs) published by DEFRA; The 2014 Land Quality Management (LQM) / Chartered Institute of Environmental

Health (CIEH) Suitable for Use Levels for Human Health Risk Assessment (S4ULs); The guidance values produced by the Environmental Industries Commission (EIC), the

Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (AGS) and Contaminated Land: Application in Real Environments (CL:AIRE) in December 2009; and

In house Generic Screening Values (DS-GACs) derived by Delta-Simons. Contaminants for which Generic Assessment Criteria are Unavailable Insufficient toxicological data is available to derive GAC for a number of potential contaminants of concern and GAC cannot be derived for derived for mixtures of compounds (e.g. total petroleum hydrocarbons). In such cases Delta-Simons will endeavour to use conservative



surrogate GAC values to provide an initial screening assessment based on the known chemical and physical properties of the contaminant.

Notes and References used in the Tables

Generic Assessment Criteria Source

SGV Soil Guidance Values published by the EA

DS-GAC Delta-Simons Generic Assessment Criteria derived using CLEA V.1.06.

C4SL Category 4 Screening Levels, DEFRA December 2014 SGV

v.1.05 Environment Agency Soil Guideline Values for dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs calculated within CLEA V.1.05.

LQM

LQM/CIEH Suitable for Use Levels for Human Health Risk Assessment (S4UL), November 2014. (Copyright Land Quality Management Limited, reduced with permission; Publication Number S4UL3087. All rights reserved).

EIC EIC/AGS/CL:AIRE Soil Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk Assessment derived using CLEA V.1.06.

Abbreviations Units All values mg/kg unless otherwise stated.

SOM

Soil Organic Matter – GAC have been derived for a range of soil organic matter content – 1%, 2.5 or 3% and 6%. In the absence of site specific data or robust soil characterisation the most conservative value of 1% soil organic matter should be used as the initial screening value.

(##)

GAC exceed saturation/vapour concentration (given in brackets). Soil concentrations above the soil saturation may indicate that non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) is present. Risks from NAPL may need to be considered separately. Reference should always be made to the site investigation observations and soil logs were available.

ND

Not derived. It was considered beyond the scope of the EIC project to collate and review plant concentration factors for the metals and therefore GAC have only been produced for land-uses that do not involve plant uptake. GAC have been calculated for antimony, barium and molybdenum for the residential without plant uptake scenario.

Use of C4SLs as Screening Criteria Only the lead C4SL should be used as an initial screening level, as there is no ‘minimal risk’ screening value available. Though primarily designed for assessing the risk of land being determined as ‘contaminated’ under Part 2A, Defra have confirmed1 that the C4SL could be used under the planning regime. Where applicable, the ‘minimal risk’ level should be used as the initial screening level and where exceedances are identified reference to, and consideration of the C4SL levels may be made in the risk assessment process.

1 Defra/Lord de Mauley letter to all Local Authorities dated 3rd September 2014.



Metals

Compound 1% SOM Source 2.5 - 3% SOM Source 6% SOM Source

Antimony ND - ND - ND -

Arsenic 32 SGV 32 SGV 32 SGV

Arsenic 37 LQM 37 LQM 37 LQM

Arsenic 37 C4SL 37 C4SL 37 C4SL

Barium ND - ND - ND -

Beryllium 1.7 LQM 1.7 LQM 1.7 LQM

Boron 290 LQM 290 LQM 290 LQM

Cadmium 10 SGV 10 SGV 10 SGV

Cadmium 11 LQM 11 LQM 11 LQM

Cadmium 22 C4SL 22 C4SL 22 C4SL

Chromium (III) 910 LQM 910 LQM 910 LQM

Chromium (VI) 6 LQM 6 LQM 6 LQM

Chromium (VI) 21 C4SL 21 C4SL 21 C4SL

Copper 2400 LQM 2400 LQM 2400 LQM

Lead 200 C4SL 200 C4SL 200 C4SL

Mercury (elemental) 0.17 DS-GAC 0.5 DS-GAC 1.0 SGV

Mercury (elemental) - - - - 1.2 LQM

Mercury (inorganic) 170 DS-GAC 170 DS-GAC 170 SGV

Mercury (inorganic) 40 LQM 40 LQM 40 LQM

Mercury (methyl) 7.4 DS-GAC 10 DS-GAC 11 SGV

Mercury (methyl) - - - - 11 LQM

Molybdenum ND - ND - ND -

Nickel 130 LQM 130 LQM 130 LQM

Selenium 350 SGV 350 SGV 350 SGV

Selenium 250 LQM 250 LQM 250 LQM

Vanadium 410 LQM 410 LQM 410 LQM

Zinc 3700 LQM 3700 LQM 3700 LQM

ND - GAC not derived. It was considered beyond the scope of the EIC project to collate and review plant concentration factors for the metals and therefore GAC have only been produced for land-uses that do not involve plant uptake. GAC have been calculated for antimony, barium and molydenum for the residential without plant uptake scenario. Italics– These values were derived based on a 6% SOM, however, the supporting documentation indicates that SOM has a negligible influence for these metals.



Petroleum Hydrocarbons


Aliphatic EC5-EC6 42 LQM 78 LQM 160 LQM

Aliphatic >EC6-EC8 100 LQM 230 LQM 530 LQM

Aliphatic >EC8-EC10 27 LQM 65 LQM 150 LQM

Aliphatic >EC10-EC12 130 (48)

LQM 330 (118)

LQM 760 (283)

LQM

Aliphatic >EC12-EC16 1100 (24)

LQM 2400 (59)

LQM 4300 (142)

LQM

Aliphatic >EC16-EC35 65000 (8.48)

LQM 92000 (21)

LQM 110000 LQM

Aliphatic >EC35-EC44 65000 (8.48)

LQM 92000 (21)

LQM 110000 LQM

Aromatic >EC5-EC7 70 LQM 140 LQM 300 LQM








Aromatic and Aliphatic >EC44-EC70 1600 LQM 1800 LQM 1900 LQM



Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH)


Naphthalene 2.3 LQM 5.6 LQM 13 LQM

Acenaphthylene 170 LQM 420 LQM 920 LQM

Acenaphthene 210 LQM 510 LQM 1100 LQM

Fluorene 170 LQM 400 LQM 860 LQM

Phenanthrene 95 LQM 220 LQM 440 LQM

Anthracene 2400 LQM 5400 LQM 11000 LQM

Fluoranthene 280 LQM 560 LQM 890 LQM

Pyrene 620 LQM 1200 LQM 2000 LQM

Benzo[a]anthracene 7.2 LQM 11 LQM 13 LQM

Chrysene 15 LQM 22 LQM 27 LQM

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2.6 LQM 3.3 LQM 3.7 LQM

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 77 LQM 93 LQM 100 LQM

Benzo[a]pyrene 2.2 LQM 2.7 LQM 3 LQM

Benzo[a]pyrene 5.0 C4SL 5.0 C4SL 5.0 C4SL

Indeno[123-cd]pyrene 27 LQM 36 LQM 41 LQM

Dibenz[ah]anthracene 0.24 LQM 0.28 LQM 0.3 LQM

Benzo[ghi]perylene 320 LQM 340 LQM 350 LQM

C4SL for benzo(a)pyrene is based on 6% SOM only, however, the published C4SL Final Project Report indicates that SOM has a negligible influence for this compound.



Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)


BTEX/MTBE

Benzene 0.33 SGV

Benzene 0.087 LQM 0.17 LQM 0.37 LQM

Benzene 0.2 C4SL - - 0.87 C4SL

Toluene 610 SGV

Toluene 130 LQM 290 LQM 660 LQM

Ethylbenzene 350 SGV

Ethylbenzene 47 LQM 110 LQM 260 LQM

Xylene – m 240 SGV

Xylene – m 59 LQM 140 LQM 320 LQM

Xylene – o 250 SGV

Xylene – o 60 LQM 140 LQM 330 LQM

Xylene – p 230 SGV

Xylene – p 56 LQM 130 LQM 310 LQM

Methyl tert-butyl ether 49 EIC 84 EIC 160 EIC

Chlorinated Solvents

Vinyl Chloride (Chloroethene) 0.00064 LQM 0.00087 LQM 0.0014 LQM

Trichloromethane (Chloroform) 0.91 LQM 1.7 LQM 3.4 LQM

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.0071 LQM 0.011 LQM 0.019 LQM

Trichloroethene (TCE) 0.016 LQM 0.034 LQM 0.075 LQM

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8.8 LQM 18 LQM 39 LQM

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 0.18 LQM 0.39 LQM 0.9 LQM

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.2 LQM 2.8 LQM 6.4 LQM

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.6 LQM 3.4 LQM 7.5 LQM

Tetrachloromethane 0.026 LQM 0.056 LQM 0.13 LQM

1,1,2 Trichloroethane 0.6 EIC 1.2 EIC 2.7 EIC

1,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 EIC 3.9 EIC 7.4 EIC

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.23 EIC 0.4 EIC 0.82 EIC

Cis 1,2-Dichloroethene 0.11 EIC 0.19 EIC 0.37 EIC

Trans 1,2-dichloroethene 0.19 EIC 0.34 EIC 0.7 EIC

Benzenes

Chlorobenzene 0.46 LQM 1 LQM 2.4 LQM

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.35 EIC 0.85 EIC 2.0 EIC

Iso-propylbenzene 11 EIC 27 EIC 64 EIC

Propylbenzene 34 EIC 82 EIC 190 EIC

Other

Bromobenzene 0.87 EIC 2.0 EIC 4.7 EIC

Bromodichloromethane 0.016 EIC 0.03 EIC 0.061 EIC

Carbon Disulphide 0.14 LQM 0.29 LQM 0.62 LQM

Chloroethane 8.3 EIC 11 EIC 18 EIC

Chloromethane 0.0083 EIC 0.0098 EIC 0.013 EIC




Dichloromethane 0.58 EIC 0.98 EIC 1.7 EIC

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.024 EIC 0.042 EIC 0.084 EIC

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.29 LQM 0.7 LQM 1.6 LQM

Styrene 8.1 EIC 19 EIC 43 EIC



Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC) and Other Organic Compounds


Chlorobenzenes

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 23 LQM 55 LQM 130 LQM

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.4 LQM 1 LQM 2.3 LQM

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 61 LQM 150 LQM 350 LQM

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1.5 LQM 3.6 LQM 8.6 LQM

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2.6 LQM 6.4 LQM 15 LQM

1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene 0.33 LQM 0.81 LQM 1.9 LQM

1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene 15 LQM 36 LQM 78 LQM

1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 0.66 LQM 1.6 LQM 3.7 LQM

1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 0.33 LQM 0.77 LQM 1.6 LQM

Pentachlorobenzene 5.8 LQM 12 LQM 22 LQM

Hexachlorobenzene 1.8

(0.2) LQM 3.3

(0.5) LQM 4.9 LQM

Pthtalates

Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

280 (8.68)

EIC 610 (21.6)

EIC 1,100 (51.7)

EIC

Diethyl phthalate 120 (13.7)

EIC 260 (29.1)

EIC 570 (65)

EIC

Di-n-butyl phthalate 13 (4.65)

EIC 31 (11.4)

EIC 67 (27.3)

EIC

Di-n-octyl phthalate 2300 (32.6)

EIC 2800 (81.5)

EIC 3100 (196)

EIC

Butyl benzyl phthalate 1400 (26.3)

EIC 3300 (64.7)

EIC 7200 (154)

EIC

Phenols

Phenol 420 SGV

Phenol 120 LQM 200 LQM 380 LQM

2,4-Dimethylphenol 19 EIC 43 EIC 97 EIC

Total Cresols (2-, 3- and 4-methylphenol) 80 EIC 180 EIC 400 EIC

Chlorophenols

Chlorophenols (except Pentachlorophenol) 0.87 LQM 2 LQM 4.5 LQM

Pentachlorophenol 0.22 LQM 0.52 LQM 1.2 LQM

Other

Biphenyl 66 (34.4)

EIC 160 EIC 360 EIC

Bromoform 2.8 EIC 5.9 EIC 13 EIC

2-Chloronaphthalene 3.7 EIC 9.2 EIC 22 EIC

2,4-Dinitrotoluene 1.5 EIC 3.2 EIC 7.2 EIC

2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.78 EIC 1.7 EIC 3.9 EIC

Hexachloroethane 0.2 EIC 0.48 EIC 1.1 EIC

Tributyl tin oxide 0.25 EIC 0.59 EIC 1.3 EIC



PCBs, Furans and Dioxins

Compound 1% SOM Source 2.5 - 3%

SOM Source 6% SOM Source

Sum of PCDDs, PCDFs and dioxin-like PCBs - - - - 0.008 SGV v.1.05

Pesticides and Herbicides


Aldrin 5.7 LQM 6.6 LQM 7.1 LQM

Dieldrin 0.97 LQM 2 LQM 3.5 LQM

Atrazine 3.3 LQM 7.6 LQM 17.4 LQM

Dichlorvos 0.032 LQM 0.066 LQM 0.14 LQM

Endosulfan (alpha) 7.4 LQM 18 LQM 41 LQM

Endosulfan (beta) 7 LQM 17 LQM 39 LQM

alpha-Hexachlorocyclohexanes 0.23 LQM 0.55 LQM 1.2 LQM

beta-Hexachlorocyclohexanes 0.085 LQM 0.2 LQM 0.46 LQM

gamma-Hexachlorocyclohexanes (inc. Lindane)

0.06 LQM 0.14 LQM 0.33 LQM

Explosives


2,4,6 Trinitrotoluene (TNT) 1.6 LQM 3.7 LQM 8.1 LQM

RDX 120 LQM 250 LQM 540 LQM

HMX 5.7 LQM 13 LQM 26 LQM

supplementary geoenvironmental report … · 2016-07-04 · hsg47 avoiding danger from underground...

Documents