supplementary online content · grant number year award project title pi name pi degree...

© 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Supplementary Online Content

Perna FM, Dwyer LA, Tesauro G, et al. Research on skin cancer–related behaviors and outcomes in the NIH grant portfolio, 2000-2014: Skin Cancer Intervention Across the Cancer Control Continuum (SCI-3C). JAMA Dermatol. Published online March 22, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.6216

eTable. Characteristics of funded and unfunded grants and investigator demographics eAppendix. Grant information, codebook, and dissemination and implementation codes

This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a Non-Human Traffic (NHT) User on 08/02/2020

1 eTable. Characteristics of Funded and Unfunded Grants and Investigator Demographics.

Men

n (%)

Women

n (%)

Total

n (%)

Total Applications (n = 112) 45 (40.2) 67 (59.8) 112/112 (100)

Total Applications Funded (n = 40)

15/45 (33.3) 25/67 (37.3) 40/112 (35.7)

R01 Applications (n = 62) 30/62 (48.4) 32/62 (51.6) 62/62 (100)

R01 Applications Funded (n = 20)

11/30 (36.7) 9/32 (28.1) 20/62 (32.3)

New Investigator1 (R01 Awards)

(n = 7) 4/30 (13.3) 3/32 (9.4) 7/62 (11.3)

Unique PIs2 (n = 65) 24/45 (53.3) 41/67 (61.2) 65/112 (58.0)

PIs w/ Multiple Submissions

(n = 22) 9/24 (37.5) 13/41 (31.7) 22/65 (33.8)

PIs w/ at least One Award

(n = 16) 6/9 (66.7) 10/13 (76.9) 16/22 (72.7)

PIs w/ Multiple Awards (n = 8)

2/9 (22.2) 6/13 (46.2) 8/22 (36.4)

Notes. Women submitted more total applications (One-sample binomial test, p = .047), but no other gender comparison was statistically significant. 2 1 New investigator awards are applicable only to R01 grant submissions. 3 2 Principal Investigator (PI); unique PI refers number of individual investigators independent of number of grant submissions. 4

5

© 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by a Non-Human Traffic (NHT) User on 08/02/2020

Grant Number

Year Award

Project Title

PI Name

PI Degree

Intervention Grant

1R01CA092505-01A2

2002 Diffusion of an Effective Skin Cancer Prevention Program

Glanz, Karen PHD Yes

1R01CA10487601 2003 Disseminating Go Sun Smart to a Recreation Industry

Buller, David B PHD Yes

1R21CA102205-01A2

2004 Body Image, Tanning Intentions, and Tanning Behavior

Thompson, Joel K PHD No

1R21CA119201-01 2005 UV Safe: New approaches to reduce teen UV exposure

Olson, Ardis L MD Yes

1R01CA103965-01A2

2005 Sun Protection for Florida's Children

Roetzheim, Richard

MD Yes

1R01CA107312-01 A2

2005 Tailored Intervention for Melanoma Patients' Families

Manne, Sharon L PHD Yes

1R21CA109670-01A2

2005 Investigation of a Behavioral Substitute for Sunbathing

Pagoto, Sherry L PHD Yes

1R03CA115092-01 2005 Improving Direct Measurement of Sun Protective Behaviors

Maddock, Jason E PHD No

1R21CA121174-01A1

2006 Development of Effective Interventions to Reduce Adolescent Use of Indoor Tanning

Lazovich, Deann PHD Yes

1R21CA116384-01 A1

2006 Evaluating optimal methods for UV-risk assessment

Hillhouse, Joel J PHD No

1R03CA128483-01A1

2007 Effects of Gain vs. Loss Frame Sun Protection Messages on Rural Indiana Adolescents

Cho, Hyunyi PHD Yes

1R03CA134205-01A1

2008 Sun Protection Among Children with a Family History of Melanoma

Glenn, Beth A. PHD No

1RC1CA145581-01 2009 Youth produced videos to reduce UV exposure in adolescents

Crane, Lori A PHD Yes

1R03CA144552-01 2009 A Skin Cancer Prevention Video Intervention for Organ Transplant Recipients

Loescher, Lois J PHD Yes

1R03CA144435-01 2009 Enhancing Patient Communication Among Dermatologists

Mallett, Kimberly A

PHD Yes

1R01CA134705-01A2

2009 Sun Safe Workplaces: A Campaign on Sun Protection Policies for Outdoor Workers


1R21CA137532- 2009 Measuring real time decision- Hay, Jennifer L PHD No


01A1 making about UVR Protection 1R03CA136007-01A1

2009 Investigating Novel Correlates of Indoor Tanning Experiences: Project INCITE

Heckman, Carolyn J

PHD No

1R01CA154908-01 2010 A comparison of interventions to teach melanoma patients' skin self-examination

Robinson, June K MD Yes

1R01CA154928-01 2010 A Tailored Internet Intervention for Skin Cancer Risk Reduction in Young Adults

Heckman, Carolyn J

PHD Yes

1R01CA152411-01A1

2010 Comprehensive Sun Protection in Recreation: An Advanced Go Sun Smart Program

Andersen, Peter Ale

PHD Yes

1R01CA140367-01A2

2010 Norms and Built Environment: Use of Shade in U.S. and Australian City Parks


1R01CA134891-01A2

2010 An Appearance-Based Intervention to Reduce Teen Skin Cancer Risk

Hillhouse, Joel J PHD Yes

1R21CA155952-01 2010 Epidemiology and Genetics of Tanning Addiction

Cartmel, Brenda Non

PHD No

1R21CA134819-01A2

2010 Biopsychosocial Relationships underlying Indoor Tanning Experience: Project BRITE

Heckman, Carolyn J

PHD No

1R03CA159083-01A1

2011 Evaluation of Sun Protection Education for Kidney Transplant Recipients


1R01CA159840-01 2011 Sustainability of the Go Sun Smart Program in a Recreation Industry

Walkosz, Barbara PHD Yes

1R01CA158322-01 2011 Impact of Melanoma Genetic Testing on Health Cognitions and Prevention Behaviors

Leachman, Sancy Ann

MD/PHD Yes

1R21CA173196-01 2012 Sun Protection Internet-Based Program for Kidney Transplant Recipients


1R21CA161576-01A1

2012 Pilot Investigation of Behavioral Alternatives to Indoor Tanning

Pagoto, Sherry L PHD Yes

1R01CA158407-01A1

2012 An innovative, curriculum-based integrated sun exposure behavior intervention for children

Cockburn, Myles G

PHD Yes

1R03CA165801- 2012 Social Influences on Indoor Stapleton, Jerod PHD No


01A1 Tanning Behavior in Young Women

1R21CA176534-01 2013 Assessing Resident Physician Melanoma Detection Across Ethnic Groups

Hernandez, Claudia

MD Yes

1R01CA176196-01A1

2013 Media Literacy Intervention for Indoor Tanning Prevention

Cho, Hyunyi PHD Yes

1R21CA173654-01A1

2013 Sun Safety Ink: A Skin Cancer Prevention Program for the Tattoo Community

Walkosz, Barbara PHD Yes

1R01HD074416-01A1

2013 Translation of District Sun Safe Policies to Schools

Reynolds, Kim Danie

PHD Yes

1R01CA175231-01 2013 Reducing Skin Cancer Risk in Childhood Cancer Survivors

Geller, Alan C MPH Yes

1R01CA181241-01A1

2014 Personalized Genomic Testing for Melanoma: Maximizing Personal Utility and Reach

Hay, Jennifer L PHD Yes

1R01CA187191-01 2014 Sun Safe Workplaces: Assessment of Benefits and Costs of a Policy Intervention


1R01CA171666-01A1

2014 An Internet-Based Behavioral Intervention for Individuals Diagnosed with Melanoma

Coups, Elliot J PHD Yes

6 7



Codebook: Skin Cancer Prevention Portfolio Analysis (Updated 7/15/15) 8 Item Label Question Content Response

CodesResponse Code Details Instructions

GRANTNUMBER What is the full grant number (e.g., 1R01CA1190677-01)?

N/A N/A

PROJTITLE What is the project title? N/A N/ACODER Coder Initials: N/A N/AINTERVENTION Does this grant test an intervention? 1 Yes If a grant is multiple

studies, and at least one of them is an intervention, select “Yes.”

2 No

NONINTSTUDY (ONLY IF THE GRANT DOES NOT TEST AN INTERVENTION): What is the research design/purpose? (Select all that apply.)

1 Epidemiological / Surveillance Study Skip this question if there is an intervention included in the grant.

If select “1”, use “Other” to note the sample / data source (e.g., nationally representative?).

2 Methodology / Measurement Development3 Cross-Sectional Study4 Longitudinal / Prospective Study5 Quasi-Experiment6 Secondary Data AnalysisOther Other: _____________________________

SECONDARY (ONLY IF THE GRANT DOES NOT TEST AN INTERVENTION): If a secondary data analysis, what is the data source?

N/A N/A Skip this question if there is an intervention included in the grant.

SAMPLEAGE What is (are) the age range(s) of the intervention sample? (Check all that apply.)

1 Children (approximate ages 0-11)2 Adolescents (approximate ages 12-17)3 Young adults (approximate ages 18-25; not

limited to college) 4 Young adults (college students only) If the grant has a general

young adult sample, do not select this category. For broad adult samples that are not specific to college students, select options “3” and “5”

5 Adults (approximate ages 26+) 99 Don't know / Not sureOther Other: _____________________________

SAMPLESEX What is (are) the sex(es) of the intervention study sample?

1 Females only2 Males only3 Both females and males

SAMPLERE Does the intervention focus on any specific racial / ethnic subgroups?

1 American Indian or Alaska Native2 Asian


(Check all that apply.) 3 Black or African American 4 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander5 White6 Hispanic or Latino/a7 No, general sample (not specific to

racial/ethnic subgroups) 99 Don't know / Not sure

SAMPLERE2 Are analyses stratified by race and/or ethnicity?

1 Yes2 No99 Don’t know / Not sure

SAMPLEDISP Does the study propose to address racial, ethnic, or socioeconomic health disparities?


SAMPLEUNIT What is (are) the unit(s) of randomization to intervention conditions? (Check all that apply.)

1 Individuals Answer this question based on randomization to intervention condition. For example, if hotels are randomized to condition, select “5.” Broader communities or organizations include businesses, towns, etc.

2 Dyads3 Families4 Groups of individuals (not families)5 Broader communities or organizations99 Don’t know / Not sureOther Other:______________________________

SAMPLESCRISK Does the intervention TARGET people who have any of the following skin cancer risk factors? (Select all that apply.) NOTE: Only indicate if the intervention specifically targets any of the following risk groups. Do NOT select all risk factors that are assessed as part of the study.

1 Those who have a current skin cancer diagnosis (melanoma or non-melanoma)

2 Those who have a personal skin cancer history (melanoma or non-melanoma)

3 Those who have a family skin cancer history (melanoma or non-melanoma)

4 Those who have a current or prior personal diagnosis of any other cancer (excluding skin cancer)

5 Those who have a history of prior sunburns6 Indoor tanners7 Those who sunbathe outdoors 8 Those who engage in other work or activities

(other than intentional tanning) that place them at elevated UV exposure (e.g., work outdoors)

9 Those who have phenotypic risk factors (e.g., fair skin, skin that easily freckles or sunburns,



light hair, or light eyes) 10 Those who live in warm sunny areas or at high

elevations 11 Those who have genetic risk factors (e.g.,

cdkn2a/p16, mc1r) or are from families known to carry these mutations

Other Other ________________________________CCCONTINUUM At what point(s) along the cancer

control continuum does the intervention focus? (Check all that apply.)

1 Pre-Screening (i.e., focus is on primary prevention among those who have not received a skin cancer screening or diagnosis)

2 Screening (i.e., focus is on those who are conducting self- skin exams or receiving professional skin exams, OR focus is on promoting examination behavior)

3 Pre-Treatment (i.e., focus is on those who have received screening results but have not yet received treatment)

4 Treatment (i.e., focus is on people receiving treatment [surgery, chemotherapy, etc.] for skin cancer)

5 Post-treatment (i.e., focus is on skin cancer survivors)

99 Don't know / Not sure

SUMMARY In one sentence, summarize the general content and aim of the intervention, using information from the Abstract.

N/A N/A Use only information from the Abstract to answer this question. If the abstract discusses multiple intervention approaches or outcomes, it is fine to summarize multiple approaches or outcomes here. The aim of this question is to get a brief, comprehensive sense of what the intervention does.

SETTING What is (are) the intervention setting(s) That is, where is the intervention implemented? (Select all that apply.)

1 Research lab2 Home3 Schools (elementary or lower) 4 Schools (middle / high)


5 Schools (college)6 Workplace If an intervention is for

both employees at and visitors of a recreational setting, select both options “6” and “8”

7 Medical setting8 Recreational setting (e.g., beach, pool, ski

resorts) If an intervention is for both employees at and visitors of a recreational setting, select both options “6” and “8”

9 Indoor tanning facility10 Wider community (e.g., neighborhood or

larger) 11 Internet / E-mail 12 Phone13 Mobile communications (e.g., text messaging,

apps) 14 General setting or not specified99 Don't know / Not sureOther Other: ________________________________

OUTCOMES1 Which are the PRIMARY intervention outcomes? That is, which intervention outcomes are specified in the FIRST or PRIMARY SPECIFIC AIMS? (Select all that apply.)

1 Sun protection Look to the Specific Aims section to answer this question. In general, the first specific aim will be the primary aim, unless otherwise specified. Answers to this question should be based on content from the first aim.

If the investigator describes more than one aim as “primary aims,” then content from all primary aims should be used to answer this question.

2 Outdoor UV exposure3 Indoor UV exposure4 Skin exams (self skin exam, partner assistance

with skin exam, skin exam from a medical professional, or other skin examination / detection)

5 Psychosocial constructs (e.g., risk perception, affect, efficacy, appearance motivations, etc.)

6 Promoting sun-safety of others (e.g., children or other family members)

7 Dissemination and/or implementation of an intervention

Other Other (e.g., vitamin D supplementation, physical activity, information-seeking, decision-making, quality of life, treatment delay/patient navigation, etc.)________________________________

OUTCOMES2 Which are the SECONDARY 1 Sun protection Use the Specific Aims


intervention outcomes? That is, what are other intervention outcomes besides those specified in the primary aims? (Select all that apply.)

2 Outdoor UV exposure section to answer this question.

Answer this question with any intervention outcomes specified in aims other than the first / primary aims.

3 Indoor UV exposure4 Skin exams (self skin exam, partner assistance

with skin exam, skin exam from a medical professional, or other skin examination / detection)

5 Psychosocial constructs (e.g., risk perception, affect, efficacy, appearance motivations, etc.)

6 Promoting sun-safety of others (e.g., children or other family members)

7 Dissemination and/or implementation of an intervention

8 Not applicable (there are no secondary intervention outcomes)

Other Other (e.g., vitamin D supplementation, physical activity, information-seeking, decision-making, quality of life, treatment delay/patient navigation, etc.)________________________________

STUDYPHASE What is (are) the research phase(s) of the intervention? (Select all that apply.)

0 T0: study describes health outcomes and determinants

1 T1: preclinical study, early phase, feasibility, randomized or non-randomized trial, pilot

Select “1” if the goal is to determine initial proof that an intervention can reliably change a target outcome (proof of concept). These studies may not necessarily be concerned with control group comparisons or random assignment.

2 T2: fully powered RCT in selected sites, but not wider dissemination

T2 studies involve random assignment to intervention conditions but the intervention is studied in a protected experimental environment. If studied in a “real world” setting, it is at one site or a set of sites under the same entity (e.g., plausibly realistic settings, but not truly representing the range of



“real world” conditions that exist if an external person were to implement the intervention at other sites.)

3 T3: implementation, wider dissemination in real world setting and practices

4 T4: evaluate public health outcomes in real world settings

T4 studies are at the population level. For example, a ski area intervention is T4 if it is implemented across all ski areas, versus a subset of ski areas.

99 Don't know / Not sureBEHAVCHANGE Does the study assess behavior change

as a result of the intervention? (Select all that apply.)

1 Yes, change in sun protection / tanning behavior

“Yes” responses should be selected if the grant includes repeated measures / pre-post change in a behavior / behaviors as a result of the intervention. This could refer to both self-report and objectively measured behavior change.

2 Yes, change in another behavior (e.g., dissemination, implementation, etc.)

3 No99 Don’t know / Not sure

INTAPPROACH Which of the following are included in the intervention approach? (Select all that apply.)

1 Changing or implementing a policy (e.g., a local, school, or workplace policy)

Policies can be broad, local, or more specific, including policies in workplaces, schools, or health care settings, among others. They may target sun protection, indoor/outdoor UV exposure, or other outcomes. Note: although formalized education programs, for example, should be coded “7”, codes for policy and/or built environment should also be made if the program states policy or built environment change


2 Changing or creating a feature of the built environment

The built environment includes architectural features, shade structures, as well as other environmental features, including signs in a workplace environment

3 Targeting appearance motives for tanning or sun protection

4 Motivational interviewing 5 Targeting availability / access of sun protection

or UV exposure 6 Personalized / tailored risk communication or

feedback 7 Other health messaging (e.g., any other

education or information about sun safety, UV exposure, skin examinations, skin cancer risk, environmental risk, etc.)

If the intervention provides any health / sun protection message other than those describes previously (messaging targeting appearance motives, or feedback / messaging that is personalized or tailored to the individual), this option should be selected.

8 Discussion between medical professionals and patients

9 Change within the family contextOther Other: ________________________________ This “Other” category can

be used to include more specific information about the intervention approach

COMPARE Does the intervention have a comparison group? Select the best response (1, 2, or 3) for a comparison group used to examine the primary outcome(s). If necessary, select “Other” if you think more than one code applies, and explain.

1 Pre-post design (no comparison group)2 Compares experimental / intervention group

to a usual care or assessment-only control Select this option if the control group gets nothing beyond what is typical for the research setting.

3 Compares experimental / intervention group to an attention control or alternative control condition

Select this category if the comparison group receives a different manipulation / any treatment beyond usual care. When deciding between options 2 & 3, defer to how the



investigator describes the control group.

4 None of the above99 Don't know / not sureOther Other _______________________________ There may be more than 1

comparison group. In such cases, select the most rigorous design included in the grant (option 2 is more rigorous than 1; option 3 is more rigorous than 2), and explain in “Other” field.

POLICY Does the intervention seek to manipulate a policy?

1 Yes Policies can be broad, local, or more specific, including policies in workplaces, schools, or health care settings, among others. They may target sun protection, indoor/outdoor UV exposure, or other outcomes.


POLICY2 Does the policy seek to manipulate any of the following? (Select all that apply.)

1 Access to indoor tanning 2 Use of sun protective behaviors (shirts/pants,

hats, eye-wear) 3 Use of sunscreen4 Sun exposureOther Other: _______________________________

BUILTENV Does the intervention seek to manipulate a feature of the built environment?

1 Yes The built environment includes architectural features, shade structures, as well as other environmental features, including signs in a workplace environment


BUILTENV2 Does the built environment change, alter, or create any of the following?

1 Shade structure(s)2 Planting or shaded-trail use 3 Architectural features to minimize sun

exposure Other Other: _______________________________


UVPHOTO Does the intervention include … INFRARED / UV PHOTOGRAPHY?


UVPHOTO2 How is INFRARED / UV PHOTOGRAPHY used? (Select all that apply.)

1 For measurement? For all technologyquestions: Select measurement if the technology is used to measure behavior, skin tones, survey responses, etc.

2 To communicate with a medical professional or research staff?

3 As part of the intervention? For all technologyquestions: Select this option if the technology is used as part of the intervention strategy or for delivery of the intervention

Other Other: _____________________________

DOSIMETER Does the intervention include… LIGHT DOSIMETER


DOSIMETER2 How is the LIGHT DOSIMETER used? (Select all that apply.)

1 For measurement?2 To communicate with a medical professional

or research staff? 3 As part of the intervention? Other Other: _____________________________

DERMASCOPE Does the intervention include... DERMASCOPE? (Note: this is a device to visually examine images of moles/skin lesions. It may or may not be used with a smartphone.)


DERMASCOPE2 How is the DERMASCOPE used? (Select all that apply.)




REFLECSPEC Does the intervention include… REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY?


REFLECSPEC2 How is REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY used? (Select all that apply.)



TEXT Does the intervention include… TEXT MESSAGING?


TEXT2 How is TEXT MESSAGING used? (Select all that apply.)



APPS Does the intervention include… MOBILE APPLICATIONS (APPS)?


APPS2 How are APPS used? (Select all that apply.)



INTERNET Does the intervention include… INTERNET / E-MAIL?


INTERNET2 How is INTERNET / E-MAIL used? (Select all that apply.)



VIDEO Does the intervention include … VIDEOS?


VIDEO2 How are VIDEOS used? (Select all that 1 For measurement?


apply.) 2 To communicate with a medical professional or research staff?

3 As part of the intervention? Other Other: _____________________________

EMA Does the intervention include... ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT / DAILY DIARIES?


EMA2 How are ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENTS / DAILY DIARIES used? (Select all that apply.)



SOCMEDIA Does the intervention include… SOCIAL MEDIA?


SOCMEDIA2 How is SOCIAL MEDIA used? (Select all that apply.)



TECHOTHER Does the intervention include any other form of technology not already mentioned?


TECHOTHER1a What is the (other) technology included in the intervention?

N/A N/A

TECHOTHER2 How is this (other) technology used? (Select all that apply.)



FRAMEWORK Is there any effort to describe a conceptual framework?

1 Yes “Yes” responses do not need to be theory-specific. If a conceptual model is discussed, even it is not referred to as a theory, select “Yes.”

2 No

THEORY Is the intervention content or 1 Yes


methodology based on any theory (i.e., does any theory drive the intervention)?


THEORYNAME Which theory(ies) is (are) mentioned by name to directly inform the intervention content or methodology (i.e., drive the intervention)?

1 Theory of Planned Behavior / Theory of Reasoned Action

2 Social Cognitive Theory 3 Social Ecological Theories/Models4 Diffusion of Innovations Theory5 Other theories (See next question.)6 No specific theories mentioned

THEORYNAME2 (If applicable): Which other theories not in the prior question are mentioned by name to directly inform the intervention content or methodology (i.e., drive the intervention)?

N/A N/A

RATIONALE Is any explanation given for the choice of a specific theory or constructs?

1 Yes2 No3 Not applicable99 Don’t know / Not sure

MEDIATION Is studying or testing mediation listed in the specific aims?

1 Yes Use only the specific aims section to answer this question.


INTERTHEORY1 Is there a general statement that an intervention will address theoretical elements / constructs?

1 Yes The default code is “No.” To select “Yes,” there needs to be a specific statement linking the intervention to the theoretical elements. Note: Although it may be uncommon, it is possible for grants to be based on theory but receive a code of “No” for this question. An example would be an intervention that is based on a certain named theory but does not discuss how the intervention addresses any of the constructs



within that theory.INTERTHEORY2 (If there is a statement that an

intervention will address theoretical elements / constructs): Where does this statement occur?

1 Abstract2 Aims3 Elsewhere (e.g., data analytic plan)4 Not applicable

INTERTHEORY3 Do specific theoretical constructs map on to specific elements of the intervention?

1 Yes, comprehensive (for all or most constructs) The default is “No.” Do the investigators specifically describe how the theoretical constructs are targeted by specific strategies in the intervention? An example would be noting that a certain part of the intervention targets one construct in their model (e.g., norms), while another strategy in their intervention targets a different construct (e.g., perceived risk). This description needs to be obvious for a “yes” response to be selected. If they have this description for only some constructs, select “Yes, limited”

2 Yes, limited (for some constructs)3 No, none

BARRIERS Does the intervention study assess… PERCEIVED BARRIERS?

1 Yes For all constructsquestions:For a “Yes” response, the grant must have the same or very similar construct name to the terms in the questions


BARRIERS2 How are PERCEIVED BARRIERS treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)

1 As an intervention target For all constructsquestions:Select “intervention target” if the investigators are looking at intervention effects on this construct, even if the construct is not the ultimate or primary

2 As a mediator3 As a moderator4 None of the above



intervention outcome.

In many cases, constructs treated as mediators (or moderators) of an intervention will also be treated as intervention targets. In such cases, all options that apply should be selected. For constructs treated as mediators, the “default” code is 1 AND 2 (target & mediator). However, if the grant does not describe how the intervention affects/ targets the construct, code only “2” (mediator only).

OPTIMISM Does the intervention study assess ... DISPOSITIONAL OPTIMISM?


OPTIMISM2 How is DISPOSITIONAL OPTIMISM treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)

1 As an intervention target 2 As a mediator3 As a moderator4 None of the above

ENVIRONMENT Does the intervention study assess… ENVIRONMENT (i.e., physical/built or social)?


ENVIRONMENT2 How is ENVIRONMENT (i.e., physical/built or social) treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


ILLNESSREP Does the intervention study assess... IILLNESS REPRESENTATIONS?


ILLNESSREP2 How are ILLNESS REPRESENTATIONS treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)

1 As an intervention target 2 As a mediator3 As a moderator



4 None of the above

INTWILL Does the intervention study assess ... INTENTION OR WILLINGNESS (to engage in a behavior), OR IMPLEMENTATION INTENTIONS?


INTEXPWILL2 How are BEHAVIORAL INTENTION, WILLINGNESS, OR IMPLEMENTATION INTENTIONS treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


NORMS Does the intervention study assess ... NORMS / NORMATIVE BELIEFS?


NORMS2 How are NORMS / NORMATIVE BELIEFS treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


OPTBIAS Does the intervention study assess … OPTIMISTIC BIAS?


OPTBIAS2 How is OPTIMISTIC BIAS treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


BENEFITS Does the intervention study assess ... PERCEIVED BENEFITS?


BENEFITS2 How are PERCEIVED BENEFITS treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


CONTROL Does the intervention study assess ... PERCEIVED CONTROL?


CONTROL2 How is PERCEIVED CONTROL treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)



4 None of the above

SEVERITY Does the intervention study assess... PERCEIVED SEVERITY?


SEVERITY2 How is PERCEIVED SEVERITY treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


VULNERABILITY Does the intervention study assess ... PERCEIVED VULNERABILITY / RISK / SUSCEPTIBILITY?


VULNERABILITY2 How is PERCEIVED VULNERABILITY / RISK / SUSCEPTIBILITY treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


EFFICACY Does the intervention study assess ... SELF-EFFICACY?


EFFICACY2 How is SELF-EFFICACY treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


OBSERVEDBEH Does the intervention study assess ... OBSERVED BEHAVIOR (any assessment of behavior that is not self-reported)?


OBSERVEDBEH2 How is OBSERVED BEHAVIOR treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


SOCSUPP Does the intervention study assess ... SOCIAL SUPPORT?


SOCSUPP2 How is SOCIAL SUPPORT treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)



4 None of the above

STAGES Does the intervention study assess ... STAGES / PROCESSES OF CHANGE?


STAGES2 How are STAGES / PROCESSES OF CHANGE treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


WORRY Does the intervention study assess... WORRY?


WORRY2 How is WORRY treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


ATTITUDE Does the intervention study assess ... ATTITUDES? (Note: if specifically mentioned, perceived barriers and perceived benefits should be coded separately [i.e., in the earlier questions about these specific constructs], rather than here.)


ATTITUDE2 How are ATTITUDES treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply)


FATALISM Does the intervention study assess ... FATALISM?


FATALISM2 How is FATALISM treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


FEAR Does the intervention study assess … FEAR?

1 Yes2 No



99 Don’t know / Not sureFEAR2 How is FEAR treated in the

intervention? (Select all that apply.) 1 As an intervention target 2 As a mediator3 As a moderator4 None of the above

KNOWLEDGE Does the intervention study assess ... KNOWLEDGE?


KNOWLEDGE2 How is KNOWLEDGE treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


OUTEXPECT Does the intervention study assess ... OUTCOME EXPECTATIONS?


OUTEXPECT2 How are OUTCOME EXPECTATIONS treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


PHYSREC Does the intervention study assess ... PHYSICIAN RECOMMENDATIONS?


PHYSREC2 How are PHYSICIAN RECOMMENDATIONS treated in the intervention? (Select all that apply.)


OTHERCONSTR Does the intervention study assess ... ANY OTHER THEORY-BASED CONSTRUCTS (i.e., any other constructs from the theory(ies) that drive or directly inform the intervention)?


OTHERCONSTR1a

What are the OTHER THEORETICAL CONSTRUCTS assessed in the intervention study?

N/A N/A

OTHERCONSTR2 How are THE OTHER THEORETICAL CONSTRUCTS treated in the

1 As an intervention target 2 As a mediator



intervention? (Select all that apply.) 3 As a moderator4 None of the above

OTHERCONSTR3 If more than one OTHER THEORETICAL CONSTRUCT was assessed, specify below if/how they were each treated in the intervention (e.g., specify if one was treated as a mediator and another as a moderator)

N/A N/A

COMMENTS Are there any other comments about this study / challenges in coding?

N/A N/A

Timestamp (Date & time code entered) 9

10 11



Dissemination and Implementation Codes 12 13

Item Label Question Content Response Codes

Response Code Details Instructions

DI Is this study a dissemination study or an implementation study?

1 Dissemination Dissemination research is the scientific study of targeted distribution of information and intervention materials to a specific public health or clinical practice audience. The intent is to understand how best to spread and sustain knowledge and the associated evidence-based intervention(s).

Implementation research is the scientific study of the use of strategies to adopt and integrate evidence-based health interventions into clinical and community settings in order to improve patient outcomes and benefit population health.

2 Implementation 3 Both

DIDesign What type of study design is employed?

1 Observational (e.g., cross-sectional, descriptive)

See articles on pragmatic RCTs (Zwarenstein et al.), dynamic wait-listed control designs (Brown et al), and/or hybrid effectiveness-implementation designs (Curran et al.) for details, if interested. 2 Quasi-experimental

(e.g., interrupted time series, non-equivalent control group)

3 Experimental (e.g., RCT, pragmatic RCT [pRCT], dynamic wait-listed control, cluster RCT, hybrid effectiveness-implementation designs)

4 Case Study 5 Other

DITheory What model, theory, or framework is being employed in the study?

1 None See Tabak et al. article and/or website (e.g., http://dissemination-implementation.org/index.aspx) for details on D&I theories.

2 Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

3 RE-AIM


4 Diffusion of Innovations 5 Other

DIOutcomes What outcomes are assessed? 1 None D = Dissemination outcomes.

I = Implementation outcomes.

EBP = evidence-based practice or program or intervention or policy.

See article by Proctor et al. on implementation outcomes, if interested.

See article by Scheirer & Dearing on sustainability, if interested.

2 Change in attitudes towards EBP (D)

3 Awareness of EBP (D) 4 Receipt of EBP (D) 5 Acceptance of EBP (D) 6 Acceptability (I) 7 Adoption (I) 8 Appropriateness (I) 9 Costs (I) 10 Feasibility (I) 11 Fidelity (I) 12 Penetration (I) 13 Sustainability (I) 14 Other

DIMethods What methods are used to assess process and/or outcomes?

1 Qualitative (e.g., interviews, focus groups)

2 Quantitative (e.g., surveys, instruments)

3 Mixed Methods (i.e., integration of qualitative and quantitative)

DISetting In what setting is the study being conducted?

1 Community-based organization

2 Medical center (e.g., private practice)

3 Recreation area (e.g., park, pool, beach)

4 School/university 5 Health department

(e.g., state, local) 6 Workplace setting 7 Other

DIStrategies Are dissemination and/or 1 Yes Dissemination strategies (e.g., packaging EBP,


implementation strategies being tested in the study?

2 No sharing EBP).

Implementation strategies (e.g., training, organizational change). See article by Powell et al. for list of implementation strategies.

14 15



supplementary online content · grant number year award project title pi name pi degree...

Documents