supply teacher? should the name be changed?. food for thought! mervin king stated that in 1966 he...

9
Supply Teacher? Should the name be changed?

Upload: erin-davidson

Post on 02-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Supply Teacher? Should the name be changed?. Food for thought! Mervin King stated that in 1966 he did six months of supply teaching. He said it was the

Supply Teacher?

Should the name be changed?

Page 2: Supply Teacher? Should the name be changed?. Food for thought! Mervin King stated that in 1966 he did six months of supply teaching. He said it was the

Food for thought!

• Mervin King stated that in 1966 he did six months of supply teaching. He said it was the hardest job ever!

Page 3: Supply Teacher? Should the name be changed?. Food for thought! Mervin King stated that in 1966 he did six months of supply teaching. He said it was the

Concerns

• Exploitation by agencies not paying proper rates for qualified teachers.

• Not making sure the teacher is fit for purpose, i.e., maths teachers sent to teach geography!

• Agencies have control over CRB charges.

• They take around £50 a day from each teacher, privatisation by stealth.

• No pay rise for between 5 and 7 years!

Page 4: Supply Teacher? Should the name be changed?. Food for thought! Mervin King stated that in 1966 he did six months of supply teaching. He said it was the

More concerns

• 20,000 supply teachers.

• In July, two weeks before the end of term, there is no work as contracts end, year on year. No holiday pay.

• Lack of CPD, no opportunity to further careers. No access to the teachers’ pension.

• Competition from cover supervisors, rarely cover has not helped.

• The age range of supply teachers. (Mostly over 40s).

• Finder fee (schools wanting to keep teachers) range from £1,000-£5,000. Is this legal?

• Supply NQTs

Page 5: Supply Teacher? Should the name be changed?. Food for thought! Mervin King stated that in 1966 he did six months of supply teaching. He said it was the

Conflicting myths

• Over 50 per cent of the current teaching force is under 35. The feeling is they have more energy and they take less time off sick.!!!

• Using HLTA’S instead of qualified teachers goes against the Government’s White Paper and the standards agenda.

Page 6: Supply Teacher? Should the name be changed?. Food for thought! Mervin King stated that in 1966 he did six months of supply teaching. He said it was the

What can we do?

• Solutions and actions.

• In your groups, discuss and plan what needs to be done.

• Choose a spokesperson or persons to feed back.

• Decide on three things that you will do when you get back to your division.

Page 7: Supply Teacher? Should the name be changed?. Food for thought! Mervin King stated that in 1966 he did six months of supply teaching. He said it was the

Group work

Page 8: Supply Teacher? Should the name be changed?. Food for thought! Mervin King stated that in 1966 he did six months of supply teaching. He said it was the

Suggestions

• Local supply teacher meetings needed, to collect data.

• Each division/association should have a supply teacher officer.

• Explore the idea of co-ops as an alternative to agencies.

• NUT representatives need to engage with supply teachers.

Page 9: Supply Teacher? Should the name be changed?. Food for thought! Mervin King stated that in 1966 he did six months of supply teaching. He said it was the

More suggestions

• A comparison section on website about agencies to shame them.

• Increase awareness amongst school governors, teacher’s actual pay compared to the cost?

• Change the name to ‘guest teacher’ or ‘visiting teacher’.

• Promote the return to supply pools.DSB13 WK Supporting Supply Teachers E_NTP 30 September 2013