supporting online material #1093373 materials and methods · supporting online material #1093373...
TRANSCRIPT
Supporting online material #1093373
Materials and Methods
Cloning
Based on H3 numbering (S1), cDNA corresponding to residues 11-329 (HA1) and 1-176 (HA2),
of the ectodomain of 18HA0 (A/South Carolina/1/18) (S2) was cloned into the baculovirus
transfer vector, pAcGP67A (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) to allow for efficient secretion of
recombinant protein. Initial constructs, however, produced only unstable monomers that
precipitated at each stage during purification (figure S2). A subsequent database search revealed
research which utilized a trimerizing sequence (‘foldon’) from the bacteriophage T4 fibritin for
stabilizing collagen triple helices (S3). A new construct containing this C-terminal ‘foldon’
sequence was made with a thrombin site introduced between the C-terminus of 18HA0 and the
‘foldon’. A His-Tag was also incorporated at the extreme C-terminus of the construct to enable
purification. Transfection and virus amplification were carried out according to the baculovirus
expression system manual (Pharmingen). Expression of secreted protein was assessed by
detection of the His-tag by Western blot using an anti-His6 antibody (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).
HA0 protein secreted into the cell culture media contains additional plasmid-encoded residues at
both the N- (ADPGYLLE) and C-terminus (RSLVPRGSPGSGYIPEAPRDGQAYVRKDGEW
VLLSTFLGHHHHHH, where the sequence in italics is the thrombin site, underlined is the
foldon sequence and bold is the His-Tag). The construct facilitated expression of unprocessed
HA0 homotrimers (figure S2) consistent with a previous report that Sf9 cells do not express
proteases that effectively cleave hemagglutinin to its infectious HA1/HA2 form (S4).
Expression and Purification
Suspension cultures of insect Sf9 cells were cultured in EX-CELL 420 serum-free media (JRH
Biosciences, Lenexa, KS). For a typical preparation, 12 liters of Sf9 cells at 2 x 106 cells/ml were
infected at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 3. After 3 days, cells were removed by
centrifugation (1500g; 20 mins) and soluble 18HA0 recovered from the cell supernatant by metal
affinity chromatography using Ni-NTA resin (Qiagen). Fractions containing 18HA0 were pooled
and dialyzed against 10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM NaCl; pH 8.0, then subjected to ion exchange
chromatography on a Mono-Q HR10/10 column (Pharmacia). Trimeric protein eluting at 160
mM NaCl was subsequently subjected to thrombin digest (3 units/mg protein; overnight at room
temperature) and purified further by gel filtration chromatography using a Superdex-200 16/60
column (Pharmacia). Protein eluting as a trimer was concentrated to 10-15 mg/ml in 10 mM
HEPES, 25 mM NaCl; pH 7.5. The yield of pure protein is approximately 1.5 mg/liter of infected
culture. At this stage, 18HA0 still contains the additional plasmid-encoded residues at both the N-
(ADPGYLLE) and C-terminus (RSLVPR)
Crystal structure determination
18HA0 crystals were grown by the sitting drop vapor diffusion method with a reservoir solution
(0.6 ml) of 1.68 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate, 0.32 M di-potassium hydrogen phosphate, 0.1
M phosphate-citrate, pH 5.5. Crystallization drops were set up at 22 °C, with 0.6 µl of protein
mixed with an equal volume of reservoir solution. The resulting crystals were ‘flash-cooled’ at a
temperature of 100 K in a reservoir solution containing 20% glycerol. A dataset was collected to
3.0Å resolution at the Stanford Synchotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL) beamline 9-2 at 100 K.
The data were indexed in spacegroup C2 with unit cell dimensions a = 190.5Å, b =109.9Å, c
=136.2Å and =108.6. Statistics for data collection are presented in Table S1. Data were
processed with the DENZO-SCALEPACK suite (S5) using all observations. One hemagglutinin
trimer occupies the asymmetric unit with an estimated solvent content of 66% based on a
Matthews’ coefficient (Vm) of 3.57 Å3/Da. Rotation functions were performed with AMoRe (S6)
and the highest rotation and translation solutions were found using a polyalanine-truncated
trimeric model of the H9 swine hemagglutinin (pdb:1JSH) (S7). Rigid body refinement of the
trimer led to an overall correlation coefficient of 46.6% and an Rcryst of 53.2%. The model was
then "mutated" to the correct sequence, rebuilt using O (S8), and refined with the Crystallography
& NMR System software (CNS version 1.1) (S9) and REFMAC (S10). Tight non-
crystallographic symmetry restraints were applied throughout model building (all non-hydrogen
atoms; weight=300). Electron density maps for model building included 2Fobs–Fcalc, Fobs–Fcalc and
composite annealed omit 2Fobs–Fcalc maps. Progress during refinement was judged by monitoring
the Rfree test set, consisting of 5% of all reflections, for cross-validation (S11) At later stages of
refinement, N-linked carbohydrates were built at nine of the fifteen potential glycosylation sites
in the HA0 trimer. The final model also contains one of the eight vector-encoded residues (Glu)
at the N-terminus, and one phosphate ion derived from the crystallization buffer. Due to poor or
no density, the HA2 C-terminal Val176 and the thrombin cleavage site residues were also omitted
from the final model. The final 18HA0 structure has an Rcryst of 27.0 % and Rfree of 29.6 % (see
Table S1). The quality of the model was checked with the program PROCHECK (S12). For the
Ramachandran plot, 98.5% of the residues were in the most favored (81.9%) and additionally
allowed regions (16.6%). Although the HA0 is a single monomeric chain, the final pdb is
numbered according to H3 numbering, based on structural overlay with the H3 structure (pdb:
2hmg). Therefore, each HA0 monomer is numbered according to H3 HA1 and HA2 subunits for
ease of comparison. Residues deemed to be insertions are numbered XA where X is the
preceding residue number in the chain (e.g. Asn 19A in HA1)
Glycosylation
The protein sequence of 18HA0 predicts six possible glycosylation sites per monomer,
but one is in the cytoplasmic tail, only four residues from the membrane insertion sequence and
unlikely to be glycosylated. Electron density is observed for nine of the possible fifteen
glycosylation sites in the trimeric construct; only a single N-acetyl glucosamine was interpretable
at six of these sites (AsnA20, AsnA34, AsnB154, AsnC34, AsnC288, AsnE34), but at glycosylation site Asn95
additional N-acetyl glucosamine and mannose residues could be interpreted (one mannose for
chains A and E and two for chain C) (Figure 1) (S13).
Figure Legends
Figure S1 Structural alignment of the amino acid sequence of 18HA0 compared to sequences
of other H1 strains and as well as other pandemic and epidemic strains from different subtypes in
the 20th century. Numbering and alignment are based on the human H3 sequence (Hu_H3 1968;
A/Aichi/2/68) (S14). Sequences of human H1 (Hu_H1 1918; A/South Carolina/1/18) (S15),
swine H1 (Sw_H1 1930; A/Swine/Iowa/15/30) (S16), human H1 (Hu_H1 1934; A/Puerto
Rico/8/34) (S17), and H2 (Hu_H2 1957; A/Singapore/1/57) (S18) are shown. Sequences for two
other subtypes that crossed the species barrier, but failed to reach pandemic levels: H5 (Hu_H5
1997; A/Hong Kong/156/97) and H9 (Hu_H9 1999; A/Hong Kong/1073/99) are also shown
(S19, S20). Only residues different from the H3 subtype are shown. Residues marked < and > are
the start/stop sites for the expressed construct. Residues shaded grey indicate potential
glycosylation sites (N-X-S/T), yellow indicates the transmembrane domain and boxed is the
cleavage site arginine in each sequence. Histidine residues marked # indicate the His patch
surrounding HA2 Trp21, while those labeled * (including HA1 Lys50) indicate the proposed pH-
dependent charged patch near the E region. Antigenic sites, identified previously by Brownlee
and Fodor (S21) are marked with different highlight colors: Ca1 (red), Ca2 (purple), Cb (green),
Sa (light blue), Sb (gold). Residues labeled • indicate those implicated in receptor binding
specificity. See main text for full discussion.
Figure S2 Gel filtration analysis of 18HA0 constructs. The original construct expressed only
the HA0 gene encoded with a His-Tag for purification (18HA0), but this produced only
monomeric material, eluting at ~70kDa (dashed line) by size exclusion chromatography on a
Superdex-200 10/30 column (Pharmacia). Thus, a new clone was engineered so that the resulting
18HA0 was fused to a C-terminal linker containing a thrombin cleavage site, a trimerizing
sequence from T4 bacteriophage (S3) and a hexa His-tag to aid purification (18HA0zip). This re-
designed construct expressed trimeric material that eluted at ~200kDa (solid line), ran as a 70kDa
protein on an SDS-PAGE gel (see gel picture inset) and yielded diffractable crystals. Figure
represents superimposed elution profiles of two separate experiments overlaid with calibration
standards (dotted line).
Figure S3 Comparison of 18HA0 to other human, avian and swine HA’s. A) Comparison of
their HA1 domains, looking down the long axis of the trimer from the membrane-distal end. B)
Schematic showing the rotation of the 18HA0 (H1, red), H5 (orange) and H9 (blue) subtypes in
relation to the H3 subtype (green). Each trimer was overlaid on their HA2 domains with the
central axis of the trimer on the z-axis, and the rotation required to superimpose the HA1
domains were determined as Tait-Bryan angles (S22). Figure S3A was generated using VMD
(S23) and rendered using Tachyon (S24).
Figure S4 18HA0 patch of surface exposed histidines. The ‘His patch’ is located near the
vestigial esterase (E) domain of the HA monomer. HisA47, HisA275, HisA285, HisA298 and LysA50 are all
within close proximity and create a highly-positively charged patch, which would increase the
charge of the HA as it enters the endosome pathway, where the pH drops well below 6.0.
Figure S5 Surface representations of the monomer of the 18HA0 structure in comparison to
the human H3 (pdb:2hmg), avian H5 (pdb:1jsm), swine H9 (pdb:1jsd) and influenza C HEF
(pdb:1flc). Surface-exposed histidines are colored blue, and indicate that the 18HA0 structure is
more avian-like with respect to the positions of the surface-exposed histidines. Figure was
generated using VMD (S23) and rendered using Tachyon (S24).
Figure S6 Antigenic sites of 18HA. Residues in the HA1 chain, previously described by
Brownlee and Fodor (S21) are grouped into 5 regions: Ca1 (169 to 173, 296 to 208, 238 to 240),
Ca2 (140 to 145, 224 to 226), Cb (78 to 83), Sa (128 to 129, 156 to 160, 162 to 167), and Sb (187
to 198). The antigenic site colors are coordinated with their corresponding sequences in FigS1.
Residues which differ between 18HA and the swine HA (A/swine/Iowa/15/30), its closest
homologue based on sequence identity, are labeled. The Asn95 glycosylation site in 18HA
adjacent to Ca1 and Ca2 is labeled.
Fig
ure
S1 1 < # # * * 96
Hu_H3 1968 QDLPGNDNST ATLCLGHHA. VPNGTLVKTI TDDQIE.VTN ATELVQSSST GKICNN.PHR ILDGIDCTLI DALLGDPHCD VFQNE.TWDL FVERSKAFSN
Hu_H1 1918 .......... D-I-I-YH-N NSTD-VDTV. .LEKNVT--H SVN-LED-HN --L-KLKGIA P-QLGK-NIA GW---N-E-- LLLTASS-SY I--T-NSENG
Sw_H1 1930 .......... D---I-YH-N NSTD-VDTV. .LEKNVT--H SVN-LED-HN --L-RLGGIA P-QLGK-NIA G..--N-E-- LLLTVSS-SY I--T-NSDNG
Hu_H1 1934 .......... D-I-I-YH-N NSTD-VDTV. .LEKNVT--H SVN-LED-HN --L-RLKGIA P-QLGK-NIA GW---N-E-- PLLPVRS-SY I--TPNSENG
Hu_H2 1957 .......... DQI-I-YH-N NSTEKVDTI. .LERNVT--H -KDILEKTHN --L-KLNGIP P-ELG--SIA GW---N-E-- RLLSVPE-SY IM-KENPRDG
Hu_H5 1997 .......... DQI-I-YH-N NSTEQVDTI. .MEKNVT--H -QDILERTHN --L-DLNGVK P-ILR--SVA GW---N-M-- E-I-VPE-SY I--KASPAND
Hu_H9 1999 .......... DKI-I--QST NSTE-VDTL. .TETNVP--H -K--LHTEHN --L-ATSLGH P-ILDT--IE GLVY-N-S-- LLLGGRE-SY I----S-VNG
97 191
• • • • •
Hu_H3 1968 .CYPYDVPDY ASLRSLVASS GTLEFITEGF ...TWTGVTQ N.GGSNACKR GPGSGFFSRL NWLTKSGSTY PVLNVTMPNN DNFDKLYIWG IHHPSTNQEQ
Hu_H1 1918 T---G-FI-- EE--EQLS-V SSF-KFEIFP KTSS-PNHET TK-VTA--SY AGA-S-YRN- L----K--S- -K-SKSYV-- KGKEV-VL-- V---P-GTD-
Sw_H1 1930 T---G-FI-- EE--EQLS-V SSF-KFEIFP KTSS-PNHET TR-VTA--PY AGA-S-YRN- L--V-KENS- -K-SKSYV-- KGKEV-VL-- V---P-STD-
Hu_H1 1934 I---G-FI-- EE--EQLS-V SSF-RFEIFP KESS-PNHNT TK-VTA--SH AGK-S-YRN- L---EKEGS- -K-KNSYV-K KGKEV-VL-- -----NSKD-
Hu_H2 1957 L---GSFN-- EE-KH-LS-V KHF-KVKILP K.DR--QH-T TG-.-R--AV SGNPS-FRNM V---EK--N- --AKGSYN-T SGEQM-I--- V---NDEK--
Hu_H5 1997 L---GNFN-- EE-KH-LSRI NHF-K-QIIP K.SS-SNHDA SS-V-S--PY LGR-S-FRNV V--I-KN-A- -TIKRSYN-T NQE-L-VL-- V---NDAA--
Hu_H9 1999 T---GN-ENL EE--T-FS-A SSYQR-QIFP .DT--N.--Y TGT.-R--S. ...GS-YRSM R---QKSGF- --QDAQYT-- RGKSI-FV-- ----P-YT--
192 290
• •• • * *
Hu_H3 1968 TSLYVQASGR VTVSTRRSQQ TIIPNIGSRP WVRGLSSRIS IYWTIVKPGD VLVINSNGNL IAPRGYFKMR TGK.SSIMRS DAPIDTCISE CITPNGSIPN
Hu_H1 1918 Q---QN-DAY -S-GSSKYNR RFT-E-AA-- K--DQAG-MN Y---LLE--- TITFEAT--- ---WYA-ALN R-SG-G-IT- ---VHD-NTK -Q--H-A-NS
Sw_H1 1930 Q---QN-DAY -S-GSSKYDR RFT-E-AA-- K---QAG-MN Y---LLE--- TITFEAT--- V---YA-ALN R-SE-G-IT- ---VHD-DTK -Q--H-A-NS
Hu_H1 1934 QNI-QNENAY -S-V-SNYNR RFT-E-AE-- K--DQAG-MN Y---LL---- TIIFEA---- ----YA-ALS R-FG-G-IT- N-SMHE-NTK -Q--L-A-NS
Hu_H2 1957 RT--QNVGTY -S-G-STLNK RST-D-AT-- K-N--G--ME FS--LLDMW- TINFE-T--- ---EYG--IS KRGS-G--KT EGTLEN-ETK -Q--L-A-NT
Hu_H5 1997 -K--QNPTTY IS-G-STLN- RLV-E-AT-- K-N-Q-G-ME FF---L--N- AINFE----F ---EYAY-IV KKGD-T--K- ELEYGN-NTK -Q--M-A-NS
Hu_H9 1999 TN--IRNDTT TS-T-EDLNR -FK-V--P-- L-N--QG--D Y--SVL---Q T-RVR----- ---WYGHVLS G-SHGR-LKT -LKGGN-VVQ -Q-EK-GLNS
291 * 328 1 57
Hu_H3 1968 DKPFQNVNKI TYGACPKYVK QNTLKLATGM RNVPEKQT.. ..RGLFGAIA GFIENGWEGM IDGWYGFRHQ NSEGTGQAAD LKSTQAAIDQ INGKLNRVIE
Hu_H1 1918 SL----IHPV -I-E-----R STK-RM---L --I-SI-S.. ..-------- ----G--T-- ------YH-- -EQ-S-Y--- Q----N---G -TN-V-S---
Sw_H1 1930 SL----IHPV -I-E------ STK-RMV--L --I-SI-S.. ..-------- ----G--T-L ------YH-- -GQ-S-Y--- Q----N---G -TN-V-S---
Hu_H1 1934 SL----IHPV -I-E-----R SAK-RMV--L --I-SI-S.. ..-------- ----G--T-- ------YH-- -EQ-S-Y--- Q----N--NG -TN-V-S---
Hu_H2 1957 TL--H--HPL -I-E------ SEK-V----L ----QIES.. ..-------- ----G--Q-- ------YH-S -DQ-S-Y--- KE---K-F-G -TN-V-S---
Hu_H5 1997 SM--H-IHPL -I-E------ S-R-V----L --T-QRERRR KK-------- ----G--Q-- V-----YH-S -EQ-SCYS-- KE---K---G VTN-V-SIIN
Hu_H9 1999 TL--H-IS-Y AF-T-----R V-S----V-L ----ARSS.. ..-------- ----G--P-L VA-----Q-S -DQ-V-M--- RD---K---K -TS-V-NIVD
58 # 157
Hu_H3 1968 KTNEKFHQIE KEFSEVEGRI QDLEKYVEDT KIDLWSYNAE LLVALENQHT IDLTDSEMNK LFEKTRRQLR ENAEEMGNGC FKIYHKCDNA CIESIRNGTY
Hu_H1 1918 ---TQ-TAVG ---NNL-R-- EN-N-K-D-G FL-I-T---- ---L---ER- L-FH--NVRN -Y--VKS--K N--K-I---- -EF-----D- -M--V-----
Sw_H1 1930 ---TQ-TVVG ---NNL-R-- KN-N-K-D-G FL-V-T---- M--L---ER- L-FH--NVKN -Y--A-S--- N--K-I---- -EF-----D- -M--V-----
Hu_H1 1934 ---IQ-TAVG ---NKL-K-M EN-N-K-D-G FL-I-T---- ---L---ER- L-FH--NVKN -Y--VKS--K N--K-I---- -EF------E -M--V-----
Hu_H2 1957 ---TQ-EAVG ----NL-R-L EN-N-KM--G FL-V-T---- ---LM--ER- L-FH--NVKN -YD-V-M--- D-VK-L---- -EF-----DE -MN-VK----
Hu_H5 1997 ---TQ-EAVG R--NNL-R-- EN-N-KM--G FL-V-T---- ---LM--ER- L-FH--NVKN -YD-V-L--- D--K-L---- -EF------E -M--VK----
Hu_H9 1999 ---KQYEI-D H------T-L NMINNKID-Q IQ-V-A---- ---L----K- L-EH-ANV-N -YN-VK-A-G S--M-D-K-- -EL-----DQ -M-T------
158 > 221
Hu_H3 1968 DHDVYRDEAL NNRFQIKGVE LKSGYKDWIL WI.SFAISCF LLCVVLLGFI MWACQRGNIR CNICI
Hu_H1 1918 -YPK-SE-SK L--EE-D--K -E-MGVYQ-- A-Y-TVA-SL V-L-S-GAIS F-M-SN-SLQ -R---
Sw_H1 1930 -YPK-SE-SK L--EE-D--K -E-MMVYQ-- A-Y-TVA-SL V-L-S-GAIS F-M-SN-SLQ -R---
Hu_H1 1934 -YPK-SE-SK L--EKVD--K -E-MGIYQ-- A-Y-TVA-SL V-L-S-GAIS F-M-SN-SLQ -R---
Hu_H2 1957 -YPK-EE-SK L--NE----K -S-MGVYQ-- A-YATVAGSL S-AIMMA-IS F-M-SN-SLQ -R---
Hu_H5 1997 -YPQ-SE--R L--EE-S--K -E-MGTYQ-- S-Y-TVA-SL A-AIMVA-LS L-M-SN-SLQ -R---
Hu_H9 1999 NRRK--E-SR LE-QK-E--K -E-EGTYK-- T-Y-TVA-SL V-AMGFAA-L F--MSN-SC- -----
Figure S2
Figure S3
Figure S4
Figure S5
Figure S6
Table S1. Data collection and refinement statistics for 18HA0
Data Collection 18HA0Resolution (Å) 49.4 – 3.0No. observations 125,868Unique reflections 51,346 (3,368)a
Completeness (%) 96.4 (95.1)a
<I/σI> 7.6 (1.4)a
Rsym
b 14.6 (52.0)a
RefinementNo. reflections (Working set) 48,772No. reflections (Test set) 2,573Rcryst (%)c 27.0Rfree (%)d 29.6Average B value (Å2) 40.4
Number of atoms in trimerProtein 11,871Carbohydrate 212PO4
2- 5
Ramachandran statistics (%)e
Most favored 81.9Additional allowed 16.6Generously allowed 0.8Disallowed 0.7
R.m.s.d. from ideal geometryBond length (Å) 0.019Bond angles (º) 1.85
a Numbers in parentheses refer to the highest resolution shell.b Rsym= (•h•IIi(h)-<I(h)>I•h•IIi(h))x100, where <I(h)> is the average intensity of ‘i’ symmetry-related observations with reflections with Bragg index ‘h’.c Rcryst = (•hklFo – Fc/•hklFo) x100d Rfree was calculated as for Rcryst, but on a test set comprising 5% of the data excluded beforerefinement.e Calculated using PROCHECK (S12).
Table S2 Comparison of r.m.s.d’s (Å) for different HA domains. A) For analyzing
differences in the overall structure, r.m.s.d values were calculated between monomers or domains
of different HA’s, after the Cα atoms of the HA2 domains of H3 (pdb:1HA0), H5 (pdb:1jsm) and
H9 (pdb:1jsd) were superimposed by sequence and structural alignment onto the equivalent
domain of 18HA0. The following residues were used for superimposition and calculation of the
r.m.s.d. values for the HA2 domain: 18HA0: A11 to A51, A276 to A324, B21 to B160; H3: A11
to A51, A276 to A324, B21 to B160; H5: A1 to A41, A273 to A321, B21 to B160 and H9: A1 to
A41, A267 to A315, B1 to B160. After superimposition, the following residues were used to
compare the HA1 domains: 18HA0: A52 to A275; H3: A52 to A275; H5: A42 to A272 and H9:
A42 to A266. The HA1 domain was further divided into the Receptor (R) and Esterase (E)
regions. The following residues were used to compare to R domains: 18HA0: A117 to A265; H3:
A117 to A265; H5: A110 to A262 and H9: A110 to A256. The following residues were
compared for the E domains: 18HA0: A52 to A116, A266 to A275 ; H3: A52 to A116, A266 to
A275; H5: A42 to A109, A263 to A272 and H9: A42 to A109, A257 to A266. For the column
labeled monomer, both HA1 and HA2 were used in the calculations.
Subtype pdbentry
Monomer HA1Domain
HA1‘R region’
HA1‘E region’
hu-H3 2hmg 4.1 6.7 7.4 2.6av-H5 1jsm 2.3 2.6 2.5 2.8sw-H9 1jsd 2.9 3.8 4.1 3.2
Table S3 R.m.s.d. (Å) for individual domains. Each domain was superimposed separately to
determine how the individual 18HA0 domains compared to equivalent domains in the other
structures. Residues were selected as for Table S2.
Subtype pdbentry
HA2Domain
HA1Domain
HA1‘R region’
HA1‘E region’
hu-H3 2hmg 2.2 2.2 1.6 2.6av-H5 1jsm 1.9 1.7 1.1 2.2sw-H9 1jsd 1.7 1.8 1.6 2.0
References
S1. W. I. Weis, A. T. Brunger, J. J. Skehel, D. C. Wiley, J Mol Biol 212, 737 (1990).S2. T. M. Tumpey et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 13849 (2002).S3. S. Frank et al., J. Mol. Biol. 308, 1081 (2001).S4. J. Crawford et al., Vaccine 17, 2265 (1999).S5. Z. Otwinowski, W. Minor, Meth. Enzymol. 276, 307 (1997).S6. J. Navaza, Acta Crystallogr. A50, 157 (1994).S7. Y. Ha, D. J. Stevens, J. J. Skehel, D. C. Wiley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 11181
(2001).S8. T. A. Jones, S. Cowan, J. Y. Zou, M. Kjeldgaard, Acta Crystallogr. A47, 110 (1991).S9. A. T. Brünger et al., Acta Crystallogr. D54, 905 (1998).S10. CCP4, Acta Crystallogr. D50, 760 (1994).S11. A. T. Brünger, Nature 355, 472 (1992).S12. R. A. Laskowski, M. W. MacArthur, D. S. Moss, J. M. Thornton, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26,
283 (1993).S13. The carbohydrate at this position is stabilized by hydrogen bonding to surrounding
residues Asn64 and Arg221 in each chain (A, C and E).S14. I. A. Wilson, J. J. Skehel, D. C. Wiley, Nature 289, 366 (1981).S15. A. H. Reid, T. G. Fanning, J. V. Hultin, J. K. Taubenberger, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
96, 1651 (1999).S16. T. Ito et al., J. Virol. 72, 7367 (1998).S17. G. Winter, S. Fields, G. G. Brownlee, Nature 292, 72 (1981).S18. J. R. Schafer et al., Virology 194, 781 (Jun, 1993).S19. E. C. Claas et al., Lancet 351, 472 (1998).S20. Y. P. Lin et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 9654 (2000).S21. G. G. Brownlee, E. Fodor, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 356, 1871 (2001).S22. H. Goldstein, in Classical Mechanics. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1980) pp. 147-
148.
S23. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, K. Schulten, J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33 (1996).S24. J. E. Stone, An Efficient Library for Parallel Ray Tracing and Animation, MSc.,
University of Missouri (1998).