supportive initiatives of brussels based stakeholders anna voseČkovÁ pardubice, 13 – 14 may 2014
TRANSCRIPT
Introducing
• CZELO is project based (grant from EUPRO I and II programme of the Czech MEYS)
• established in Brussels in 2005
• implemented by Technology Centre ASCR (NCPs + Strategic studies = project CZERA, EEN)
• CZELO3 (2013 – 2016)
Introducing
• free of charge services to anybody interested in European and international RTDI cooperation
• focus also on higher education, innovation, entrepreneurship
• new website structured thematically to H2020
• electronic CZELO Bulletin in English
Introducing
• Brochure on new generation of EU programmes and initiatives (in Czech) – CZELO + CEBRE (in June 2014)
• CZELO Conference „Water research for Agriculture“, 10 June 2014 in Brussels
• 8th Czech Street Party – CZELO stand (interactive quiz on alternative food), 13 June 2014 in Brussels
Brussels stakeholders
• intensive RTDI environment
• F2F contacts with experts
• close and active cooperation of RTDI and higher education offices
• growing number of new RTDI initiatives with seat in Brussels
IGLO (1)
Informal Group
of Liaison Offices
• 24 offices (SLORD being the newest)
• representing a country or other national body
IGLO (2)
• information sharing, partner search, joint events, bilateral consultative meetings, promotion of Czech capabilities
• 8 working groups – CZELO co-chairs two of them (INCO, FP Implementation)
• ERA-in-Action (active involvement of national experts)
EU Institutions (1)
• EU institutions (Council of the EU, European Parliament, European Commission: EC Directorates General – most important)
• DG RTD (Research and Innovation): policy and strategy planning, horizontal issues
• DG CONNECT (Communication Networks, Content and Technology): ICT, FET
EU Institutions (2)
• Other DGs (MOVE, ENVI, CLIMA, ENTR, ENER … + EAC, REGIO)
• Executive Agencies managing EU projects: REA ERCEA EASME INEA EACEA
Associations
• similar working methods as IGLO• but also common statements, advice papers, joint
projects• examples: EUREKA, COST, EARTO, ERRIN,
LERU, EUA etc.• smaller ones: EuroTech, Coimbra Group, Access
EU• new instruments: EIT KICs, art. 185 and 187
Individual Institutions
• aim: more visibility and direct lobbying, trainings and writing proposals
• usually the case of bigger Member States• real expertise in the office is possible• examples:
DE - Helmholtz, Max Planck, Leibniz, DLR, Fraunhofer, BayFOR, DAAD
UK – Wolverhampton UNI, TSB ES – A4U NL - TNO
Recommendations (1)
• well structured and updated web (even in English)
• direct link from the homepage to European and international cooperation activities
• research team profiles (in English)
• full exploitation of membership in European and international bodies
Recommendations (2)
• full use of all contacts made during other cooperation (projects, events etc.)
• synergies within the university / research organization: projects financed by different sources should be managed by one department