supreme court cases the supreme court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 3: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer.
A. Engel v. VitaleB. Miller v. California C. Gideon v. WainwrightD. Mapp v. Ohio
1
![Page 4: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer.
A. B. C. Gideon v. WainwrightD.
1
![Page 5: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
In this 1833 case the Supreme Court held that the Bill of Rights only limited actions of the federal government, not the states.
A. Marbury v. MadisonB. McCulloch v. MarylandC. Barron v. BaltimoreD. Gibbons v. Ogden
2
![Page 6: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
In this 1833 case the Supreme Court held that the Bill of Rights only limited actions of the federal government, not the states.
A. B. C. Barron v. BaltimoreD.
2
![Page 7: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Supreme Court held that the First Amendment protects newspapers from “prior restraint”.
A. Lemon v. KurtzmanB. Near v. MinnesotaC. Zelmon v. Simmons-HarrisD. Texas v. Johnson
3
![Page 8: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Supreme Court held that the First Amendment protects newspapers from “prior restraint”.
A. B. Near v. MinnesotaC. D.
3
![Page 9: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
In this case the Supremes held that Congress has powers beyond those enumerated in the Constitution (“necessary and proper” clause).
A. Gibbons v. OgdenB. McCulloch v. MarylandC. Barron v. BaltimoreD. Marbury v. Madison
4
![Page 10: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
In this case the Supremes held that Congress has powers beyond those enumerated in the Constitution (“necessary and proper” clause).
A. B. McCulloch v. MarylandC. D.
4
![Page 11: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Supreme Court held that the 4th Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure applies to the states.
A. Mapp v. OhioB. Miller v. CaliforniaC. Miranda v. ArizonaD. Gregg v. Georgia
5
![Page 12: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The Supreme Court held that the 4th Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure applies to the states.
A. Mapp v. OhioB. C. D.
5
![Page 13: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The Supreme Court held that abortion is legal, as a matter of “privacy”.
A. Roth v. U.S.B. Roe v. WadeC. Webster v. Health ServicesD. Planned Parenthood v. Casey
6
![Page 14: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Supreme Court held that abortion is legal, as a matter of “privacy”.
A. B. Roe v. WadeC. D.
6
![Page 15: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Supreme Court held that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the 1st Amendment.
A. Gregg v. GeorgiaB. Gitlow v. New YorkC. NY Times v. SullivanD. Schenck v. U.S.
7
![Page 16: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The Supreme Court held that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the 1st Amendment.
A. B. C. D. Schenck v. U.S.
7
![Page 17: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
In this case the Supreme Court held that it holds the power of judicial review and has the right to determine Constitutional meaning.
A. McCulloch v. MarylandB. Gibbons v. OgdenC. Marbury v. MadisonD. Barron v. Baltimore
8
![Page 18: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
In this case the Supreme Court held that it holds the power of judicial review and has the right to determine Constitutional meaning.
A. B. C. Marbury v. MadisonD.
8
![Page 19: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The Supremes decision that sets guidelines for police questioning of accused persons; serves to protect people against self-incrimination.
A. Gitlow v. New YorkB. Gregg v. Georgia C. Roth v. U.S.D. Miranda v. Arizona
9
![Page 20: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The Supremes decision that sets guidelines for police questioning of accused persons; serves to protect people against self-incrimination.
A. B. C. D. Miranda v. Arizona
9
![Page 21: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
In this case the Supreme Court held that the 1st Amendment protection of speech applies to the states as well as the federal government.
A. Gitlow v. New YorkB. NY Times v. SullivanC. NY Times v. U.S.D. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
10
![Page 22: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
In this case the Supreme Court held that the 1st Amendment protection of speech applies to the states as well as the federal government.
A. Gitlow v. New YorkB. C. D.
10
![Page 23: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The Supremes held that burning of the American flag is protected as “symbolic speech” under the 1st Amendment.
A. Roth v. United StatesB. Miller v. CaliforniaC. Brandenburg v. OhioD. Texas v. Johnson
11
![Page 24: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The Supremes held that burning of the American flag is protected as “symbolic speech” under the 1st Amendment.
A. B. C. D. Texas v. Johnson
11
![Page 25: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
In this case the Supreme Court held that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
A. Roth v. United StatesB. NY Times v. SullivanC. NY Times v. U.S.D. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
12
![Page 26: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
In this case the Supreme Court held that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press.
A. Roth v. United StatesB. C. D.
12
![Page 27: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
The Supremes held that speech is not protected if it encourages imminent lawless actions.
A. New York Times v. SullivanB. Zurcher v. Stanford DailyC. Brandenburg v. OhioD. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
13
![Page 28: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The Supremes held that speech is not protected if it encourages imminent lawless actions.
A. B. C. Brandenburg v. OhioD.
13
![Page 29: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
In this case the Supreme Court decided to leave it to local communities to decide whether material is obscene and therefore unprotected by the 1st Amendment.
A. Miller v. CaliforniaB. NY Times v. SullivanC. Miami Herald v. TornilloD. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
14
![Page 30: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
In this case the Supreme Court decided to leave it to local communities to decide whether material is obscene and therefore unprotected by the 1st Amendment.
A. Miller v. CaliforniaB. C. D.
14
![Page 31: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The Supremes upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, meaning it is not “cruel and unusual punishment” under the 8th Amendment.
A. NAACP v. AlabamaB. Griswold v. ConnecticutC. Engel v. VitaleD. Gregg v. Georgia
15
![Page 32: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The Supremes upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, meaning it is not “cruel and unusual punishment” under the 8th Amendment.
A. B. C. D. Gregg v. Georgia
15
![Page 33: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The Supremes held that public officials must prove “actual malice” and “reckless disregard for the truth” to win a libel suit against the press.
A. New York Times v. SullivanB. Zurcher v. Stanford DailyC. Red Lion Broadcasting v. F.C.C.D. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
16
![Page 34: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
The Supremes held that public officials must prove “actual malice” and “reckless disregard for the truth” to win a libel suit against the press.
A. New York Times v. SullivanB. C. D.
16
![Page 35: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The Supremes held that the “no prior restraint” rule prevented the government from stopping the publishing of the “Pentagon Papers”.
A. New York Times v. United StatesB. Washington Post v. NixonC. Ellsberg v. United StatesD. New York Times v. Nixon
17
![Page 36: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The Supremes held that the “no prior restraint” rule prevented the government from stopping the publishing of the “Pentagon Papers”.
A. New York Times v. United StatesB. C. D.
17
![Page 37: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
In this case the Supreme Court held state officials violated the 1st Amendment when it had schoolchildren recite a prayer it wrote.
A. Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisB. Engel v. VitaleC. Lemon v. KurtzmanD. Griswold v. Connecticut
18
![Page 38: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
In this case the Supreme Court held state officials violated the 1st Amendment when it had schoolchildren recite a prayer it wrote.
A. B. Engel v. VitaleC. D.
18
![Page 39: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
In this case the Supreme Court held that a state could provide families with vouchers to be used to pay tuition at religious schools.
A. Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisB. The Pope v. United States C. Lime v. KurtzmanD. Griswold v. Connecticut
19
![Page 40: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
In this case the Supreme Court held that a state could provide families with vouchers to be used to pay tuition at religious schools.
A. Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisB. C. D.
19
![Page 41: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
A. Carlin v. FCCB. FCC v. Pacifica FoundationC. &%$# v. United States
20
The Seven Words you cannot say on radio or TV
are . . . CENSORED
![Page 42: SUPREME COURT CASES The Supreme Court held that anyone accused of a felony, where imprisonment may be imposed, has a right to a lawyer. A.Engel v. Vitale](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032721/56649cd85503460f949a1687/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
A. B. FCC v. Pacifica FoundationC.
20
The Seven Words you cannot say on radio or TV
are . . . CENSORED