surface acoustic wave (saw) based sensors
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
SURFACE ACOUSTIC WAVE (SAW) BASED SENSOR
Shreesh Mohan Verma
Tanuj Agarwal
Surface Acoustic Wave
A surface acoustic wave (SAW) is an acoustic wave traveling along the surface of a material exhibiting elasticity, with amplitude that typically decays exponentially with depth into the substrate.
Surface acoustic waves were discovered in 1885 by Lord Rayleigh, and are often named after him: Rayleigh waves. A surface acoustic wave is a type of mechanical wave motion which travels along the surface of a solid material.
The velocity of acoustic waves is typically 3000 m/s, which is much lower than the velocity of the electromagnetic waves.
Waves
Longitudinal Wave
Transverse Wave
Rayleigh surface wave
Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors
Surface acoustic wave sensors are a class of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) which rely on the modulation of surface acoustic waves to sense a physical phenomenon.
The sensor transduces an input electrical signal into a mechanical wave which, unlike an electrical signal, can be easily influenced by physical phenomena.
The device then transduces this wave back into an electrical signal. Changes in amplitude, phase, frequency, or time-delay between the input and output electrical signals can be used to measure the presence of the desired phenomenon.
Conventional fields of application – communications and signal processing Other application - as identification tags, chemical and biosensors, and as sensors of different physical quantities.
The SAW sensors are passive elements (they do not need power supply) and can be accessed wirelessly, enabling remote monitoring in harsh environment. They work in the frequency range of 10 MHz to several GHz.
They have the rugged compact structure, outstanding stability, high sensitivity, low cost, fast real time response, extremely small size (lightweight).
BASIC PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION OF SAW DEVICES
The operation of the SAW device is based on acoustic wave propagation near the surface of a piezoelectric solid. This implies that the wave can be trapped or otherwise modified while propagating.
The displacements decay exponentially away from the surface, so that the most of the wave energy (usually more than 95 %) is confined within a depth equal to one wavelength.
The surface wave can be excited electrically by means of an interdigital transducer (IDT).
7
What is a typical SAW Device? A solid state device
Converts electrical energy into a mechanical wave on a single crystal substrate
Provides very complex signal processing in a very small volume
Approximately 4-5 billion SAW devices are produced each year
Applications:Cellular phones and TV (largest market)
Military (Radar, filters, advanced systems
Currently emerging – sensors, RFID
PRINCIPLE
A basic SAW device consists of two IDTs on a piezoelectric substrate such as quartz. The input IDT launches and the output IDT receives the waves.
The basic structure of a SAW device
PRINCIPLE
The interdigital transducer consists of a series of interleaved electrodes made of a metal film deposited on a piezoelectric substrate as shown above.
The width of the electrodes usually equals the width of the inter-electrode gaps giving the maximal conversion of electrical to mechanical signal, and vice versa.
The minimal electrode width which is obtained in industry is around 0.3 μm, which determines the highest frequency of around 3 GHz.
PRINCIPLE
The commonly used substrate crystals are: quartz, lithium niobate, lithium tantalate, zinc oxide and bismuth germanium oxide. They have different piezoelectric coupling coefficients and temperature sensitivities. The ST quartz is used for the most temperature stable devices.
The wave velocity is a function of the substrate material and is in the range of 1500 m/s to 4800 m/s, which is 105 times lower than the electromagnetic wave velocity. This enables the construction of a small size delay line of a considerable delay.
The input and output transducers may be equal or different. It depends upon the function which the SAW device has to perform. Usually, they differ in electrode’s overlaps, number and sometimes positioning.
If the electrodes are uniformly spaced, the phase characteristic is a linear function of frequency, e.g., the phase delay is constant in the appropriate frequency range. This type of the SAW device is than called delay line.
In the second type of SAW devices – SAW resonators , IDTs are only used as converters of electrical to mechanical signals, and vice versa, but the amplitude and phase characteristics are obtained in different ways.
Fig-2One-port SAW resonator
• In resonators, the reflections of the wave from either metal stripes or grooves of small depths are used.
In the one-port SAW resonator only one IDT, placed in the center of the substrate, is used for both, input and output, transductions.
The input electrical signal connected to IDT, via antenna or directly, forms a mechanical wave in the piezoelectric substrate which travels along the surface on both sides from the transducer.
The wave reflects from the reflective array and travels back to the transducer, which transforms it back to the electrical signal. The attenuation of the signal is minimal if the frequency of the input signal matches the resonant frequency of the device.
Device Layout
The basic surface acoustic wave device consists of a piezoelectric substrate, an input interdigitated transducer (IDT) on one side of the surface of the substrate, and a second, output interdigitated transducer on the other side of the substrate.
Surface Acoustic Wave Sensor Interdigitated Transducer Diagram
The space between the IDTs, across which the surface acoustic wave will propagate, is known as the delay-line. This region is called the delay line because the signal, which is a mechanical wave at this point, moves much slower than its electromagnetic form, thus causing an appreciable delay.
15
SAW Materials to Meet Sensor Needs
Material Crystal cut Coupling coefficient
Temperature coefficient
SAW Velocity Max Temp
LiNbO3 Y,Z 4.6% 94 ppm/ºC 3488 m/s ~500 ºC
128ºY,X 5.6% 72 ppm/ºC 3992 m/s ~500 ºC
LiTaO3 Y,Z 0.74% 35 ppm/ºC 3230 m/s ~500 ºC
Quartz ST 0.16% 0 ppm/ºC 3157 m/s 550 ºC
Langasite Y,X 0.37% 38 ppm/ºC 2330 m/s >1000 ºC
138ºY,26ºX 0.34% ~0 ppm/ºC 2743 m/s >1000 ºC
SNGS Y,X 0.63% 99 ppm/ºC 2836 m/s >1000 ºC
SAW travels ~ 105 slower than EM waveSAW wavelength @ 1 GHz ~ 3 um
RFID Sensor
RFID Acquisition Priority for system Coding approach Demodulation
approach System Parameters
Measurand Extraction RFID is acquired S/N ratio Accuracy Acquisition rate
Two primary system functions: RFID and extraction of the measurand. The RFID must first be acquired and then the measurand extracted. The presentation will address these issues for a temperature sensor system.
16
Diversity for Identification
Frequency Spectrum Diversity per Device Coding Divide into frequency bands
Time Delay per Device Different offset delays per device Pulse position modulation Time allocations minimize code collisions
Spatial Diversity – device placement Sensor & Tx-Rx Antenna Polarization Use combinations of all to optimize system
17
18
One port devices return the altered interrogation signal
Range depends on embodiment Range increased using coherent
integration of multiple responses Interrogator used to excite devices Several embodiments are shown next
Brief Introduction to Wireless SAW Sensors
19
Reflective Delay Line Sensor
First two reflectors define operating temperature range of the sensor
Time difference between first and last echoes used to increase resolution of sensor
No coding as shown
“Wireless Interrogator System for SAW-Identification-Marks and SAW-Sensor Components”,
F. Schmidt, et al, 1996 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium
20
SAW Chirp Sensor
Increased sensitivity when compared with simple reflective delay line sensor
Multi-sensor operation not possible due to lack of coding
“Spread Spectrum Techniques for Wirelessly Interrogable Passive SAW Sensors”,
A. Pohl, et al, 1996 IEEE Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications
21
Impedance SAW Sensors
External classical sensor or switch connected to second IDT which operates as variable reflector
Load impedance causes SAW reflection variations in magnitude and phase
No discrimination between multiple sensors as shown
“State of the Art in Wireless Sensing with Surface Acoustic Waves”,
W. Bulst, et al, IEEE UFFC Transactions, April 2001
SAW RFID Practical Approaches
Resonator Fabry-Perot Cavity Frequency selective, SAW device Q~10,000
Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) Delay line – single frequency Bragg reflectors Pulse position encoding
Orthogonal Frequency Coding (OFC) Delay line, multi-frequency Bragg reflectors Pulse position encoding Frequency coupled with time diversity
22
SAW Resonator
D D
Grating GratingIDT
354.6 354.8 355 355.2 355.4 355.6 355.8 356 356.2 356.4-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
Frequency, MHz
S11
mag
nitu
de (
dB)
experimentalpredicted
“Remote Sensor System Using Passive SAW Sensors”,
W. Buff, et al, 1994 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium
Q~10,000
• Resonant cavity• Frequency with maximum returned
power yields sensor temperature• High Q, long time response• Coding via frequency domain by
separating into bands
23
SAW CDMA Delay Line
CDMA Tag Concept•Single frequency Bragg reflectors
•Coding via pulse position modulation
•Large number of possible codes
•Short chips, low reflectivity - (typically 40-60 dB IL)
•Early development by Univ. of Vienna, Siemens, and others
24
CDMA Tag
SAW OFC Delay Line
Piezoelectric Substrate
f1 f4 f6 f0f2 f5 f3
0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.460
50
40
30
20
ExperimentalCOM Simulated
Time (us)
Mag
nitu
de (
dB)
OFC Tag
•Multi-frequency (7 chip example)
•Long chips, high reflectivity
•Orthogonal frequency reflectors –low loss (6-10 dB)
•Example time response (non-uniformity due to transducer)
OFC Tag
DUT - RF probe connected to transducer
Bragg reflector gratings at differing frequencies
Micrograph of device under test (DUT)
25
Resonator/CDMA/OFC
Resonator, CDMA, and OFC embodiments have all been successfully demonstrated and applied to various applications. Devices and systems have been built in the 400 MHz, 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz bands by differing groups.
Resonator•Minimal delay•Narrowband PG~1•Fading•Frequency domain coding•High Q – long impulse response•Low loss sensor
CDMA•Delay as reqd. ~ 1usec•Spread Spectrum
Fading immunity Wideband PG >1
•Time domain coding•Large number of codes using PPM
OFC•Delay as reqd. ~ 1usec•Spread Spectrum
Fading immunity Ultra Wide Band PG >>1
•Time & frequency domain coding•Large number of codes using PPM and diverse chip frequencies
26
OFC Historical Development
Several different OFC sensors demonstrated Chose 1st devices at 250 MHz for feasibility Demonstrated harmonic operated devices at 456,
915 MHz and 1.6 GHz Fundamental device operation at 915 MHz Devices in the +1 GHz range in 2010 First OFC system at 250 MHz Current OFC system at 915 MHz First 4 device wireless operation in 2009 Mnemonics demonstrates first chirp OFC corelator
receiver in 2010
27
Why OFC SAW Sensors?
A game-changing approach
All advatageous of SAW technology
Wireless, passive and multi-coded sensors
Frequency & time offer greatest coding diversity
Single communication platform for diverse sensor embodiments
Radiation hard Wide operational
temperature range
28
Piezoelectric Substrate
f1 f4 f6 f0f2 f5 f3
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.80
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Normalized Frequency
Mag
nitu
de (
Lin
ear)
Schematic of OFC SAW ID Tag
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 71
0.5
0
0.5
1
Normalized Time (Chip Lengths)
Time domain chips realized in Bragg reflectors having differing carrier frequencies and frequencies are non-sequential which provides coding
Sensor bandwidth is dependent on number of chips and sum of chip bandwidths. Frequency domain of Bragg reflectors: contiguous in frequency but shuffled in time
29
Example 915 MHz SAW OFC Sensor
FFT
US QuarterSAW Sensor
SAW OFC Reflector Chip Code
f4 f3 f1 f5 f2
30
Synchronous Correlator Transceiver
31
Temperature ExtractionUsing Adaptive Corelator
Comparison of ideal and measured matched filter of two different SAW sensors : 5-chip frequency(below)
-0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Time (s)
Am
plitu
de (
Nor
mal
ized
)
Experimental
Ideal
-0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Time (s)
Am
plitu
de (
Nor
mal
ized
)
Experimental
IdealNS403
NS401
Normalized amplitude (dB) versus time
Stationary plots represent idealized received SAW sensor RFID signal at ADC. Adaptive filter matches sensor RFID temperature at the point when maximum correlation occurs.
32
Synchronous Correlator Receiver
Block diagram of a correlator receiver using ADC
-0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Time (s)
Am
plitu
de (
Nor
mal
ized
)
Experimental
Ideal
OFC Single Sensor Signal
Correlation Output
Temperature Extraction
33
250 MHz Wireless Pulsed RF OFC SAW System - 2nd Pass
An OFC SAW temperature sensor data run on a free running hotplate from an improved 250 MHz transceiver system. The system used 5 chips and a fractional bandwidth of approximately 19%. The dashed curve is a thermocouple reading and the solid curve is the SAW temperature extracted data. The SAW sensor is tracking the thermocouple very well; the slight offset is probably due to the position and conductivity of the thermocouple.
50 cm 50 cm
30 cm 30 cm
SAW Sensor/Tag
Interrogator(Transmitter)
Receiver
Hot Plate
78°CThermal
Controller
Thermal Couple
34
RF Transceiver: Sensor Overview
OFC with single wideband transducer Center Frequency: 915 MHz Bandwidth: Chirp - ~78 MHz Number of Chips: 5 Chip length 54ns/each, total reflector
length 270ns Substrate: YZ LiNbO3
35
SAW 915 MHz OFC Sensor
SAW sensor acts as RFID and sensor All antenna & transducer effects are doubled Antenna gain and bandwidth are dependent
on size scaled to frequency SAW propagation loss is frequency
dependent
36
Parameter Definitions(extensive list of variables)
PG= signal processing gain of the system (= τ·B)
PL= path loss NF= receiver noise figure Next= external noise source
referenced to antenna output
NADC= ADC equivalent noise Nsum= number of
synchronous integrations in ADC
PGC = pulse compression gain from chirp interrgogation
37
ADC= ideal analog-to-digital converter
MDS= minimum detectable signal at ADC
S= signal power measured at ADC
N= noise power measured at ADC
kT= thermal noise energy EIRP= equivalent radiated
power GRFIDS= RFIDS gain (less than
unity for passive device) GRx-ant= gain of the receiver
antenna GRx= receiver gain from
antenna output to ADC
RF Chirp Transceiver Parameters Power to antenna = 30dBm Pulse-length = 700ns, 20Vpp
Antenna Gain = 9dB Bandwidth = 74MHz Receiver Gain = 45dB NF = 15dB PGC= 49 = 17 dB
38
UCF Sensor Development
The following are a few of the successful UCF sensor projects
The aim is to enable wireless acquisition of the sensors data
The further goal is to develop a multi-sensor system for aerospace applications
Successful wireless sensing has been demonstrated for temperature, liquid, closure, and range
There is an extensive body of knowledge on sensing
Wired SAW sensing has quite an extensive body of knowledge and continues
Wireless SAW sensing has been most successfully demonstrated for single, or very few devices and in limited environments
39
UCF OFC Sensor Successful Demonstrations
Temperature sensing Cryogenic: liquid nitrogen Room temperature to 250oC Currently working on sensor for operation to
750oC Cryogenic liquid level sensor: liquid
nitrogen Pressure/Strain sensor Hydrogen gas sensor Closure sensor with temperature
40
Differential SAW OFC Thin Film Gas Sensor Embodiment
2.00 mm
1.25 mm 1.38 mm 1.19 mm2.94 mm
6.75 mm
f3 f5 f0 f6 f2 f4 f1
Piezoelectric Substrate
f3 f5 f0 f6f2 f4 f1
f1 f4 f2 f6f0 f5 f3
41
42
Temperature Sensor using Differential Delay Correlator Embodiment
Piezoelectric Substrate
f1 f4 f6 f0f2 f5 f3f1f4f6f0 f2f5f3
Temperature Sensor Example
250 MHz LiNbO3, 7 chip reflector, OFC SAW sensor tested using temperature controlled RF probe station
43
Temperature Sensor Results
250 MHz LiNbO3, 7 chip reflector, OFC SAW sensor tested using temperature controlled RF probe station
Temp range: 25-200oC Results applied to simulated
transceiver and compared with thermocouple measurements
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2000
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200Temperature Sensor Results
Time (min)
Te
mp
era
ture
( C)
LiNbO3 SAW Sensor
Thermocouple
44
OFC Cryogenic Sensor Results
0 5 10 15 20 25-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
Time (min)
Tem
pera
ture
( C
)
ThermocoupleLiNbO
3 SAW Sensor
Scale
Vertical: +50 to -200 oC
Horizontal: Relative time (min)
Measurement system with liquid nitrogen Dewar and vacuum chamber for DUT
OFC SAW temperature sensor results and comparison with thermocouple measurements at cryogenic temperatures. Temperature scale is between +50 to -200 oC and horizontal scale is relative time in minutes.
45
Schematic and Actual OFC Gas Sensor
Piezoelectric Substrate
f1 f0f2 f3f1f0 f2f3
•For palladium hydrogen gas sensor, Pd film is in only in one delay path, a change in differential delay senses the gas (τ1 = τ2) (in progress)
Differential mode OFC Sensor Schematic
Actual device with RF probe
Hydrogen Gas sensor Palladium Background Information
The bulk of PD research has been performed for Pd in the 100-10000 Angstrom thickness
Morphology of ultra-thin films of Pd are dependent on substrate conditions, deposition and many other parameters
Pd absorbs H2 gas which causes lattice expansion of the Pd film – called Hydrogen Induced Lattice Expansion (HILE) – Resistivity reduces
Pd absorbs H2 gas which causes palladium hydride formation – Resistivity increases
Examine these effects for ultra-thin films (<5nm) on SAW devices
HILE - Each small circle represents a nano-sized
cluster of Pd atoms
CO
NTA
CT
CO
NTA
CT
W ithout H2
CO
NTA
CT
CO
NTA
CT
With H2
46
Pd Films on SAW DevicesSchematic of Test Conditions
Control: SAW delay line on YZ LiNbO3 wafers w/ 2 transducers and reflector w/o Pd film
Center frequency 123 MHz (A) SAW delay line w/ Pd in
propagation path between transducer and reflector
(B) SAW delay line w/ Pd on reflector only
Pd Film
(A )
(B )
Pd
Film
1.27 mm
47
Hydrogen Gas Sensor Results: 2% H2 gas
48
1.7 1.8 1.9 2 2.1 2.280
76
72
68
64
60
56
52
48
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
Delay Line w/o PdAfter Pd FilmDuring 1st H2 ExposureAfter 1st H2 ExposureDuring 2nd H2 ExposureAfter 2nd H2 ExposureDuring 3rd H2 ExposureAfter 3rd H2 ExposureDuring 4th H2 ExposureAfter 4th H2 Exposure
Time (micro-seconds)N
orm
aliz
ed M
agni
tude
(dB
)
Pd
Film
100 1 103
1 104
1 105
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
3410
3425
3440
3455
3470
3485
3500
Loss/cm @ 123 MHzLoss/cm due to Pd FilmLoss/cm due to Pd Film After Final H2 Gas ExposureLoss/cm due to successive H2 exposureSAW VelocitySAW Velocity due to Pd FilmSAW Velocity due to Pd Film After Final H2 Gas ExposureSAW Velocity due to successive H2 exposure
Propagation Loss (dB/cm) and Velocity(m/s) vs. Film Resistivity
Resistivity (ohm-cm)
Los
s (d
B/c
m)
SA
W V
eloc
ity (
m/s
)
Pd
Film
Nano-Pd Film – 25 Ang.
•The change in IL indicates a <20 dB sensitivity range and further tests were < 50 dB!
•Sensitive hydrogen sensor is possible.
Theory (lines) versus measurement data
49
Applications
Current efforts include OFC SAW liquid level, hydrogen gas, pressure and temperature sensors
Multi-sensor spread spectrum systems Cryogenic sensing High temperature sensing Space applications Turbine generators Harsh environments Ultra Wide band (UWB) Communication
UWB OFC transducers Potentially many others
Current to Future50
Vision for Future
• Multiple access, SAW RFID sensors• SAW RFID sensor loss approaching 6 dB
– Unidirectional transducers– Low loss reflectors
• New and novel coding• New and novel sensors• New materials for high temperature (1000oC) and
harsh environments• SAW sensors in test space flight and support
operations in 1 to 5 years
51