surveying volunteering : giving in the netherlands
DESCRIPTION
Surveying Volunteering : Giving in the Netherlands. René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam. Giving in the Netherlands. A biennial survey among a preselected pool of potential respondents recruited by polling institute TNS/NIPO - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Surveying Volunteering: Giving in the Netherlands
René BekkersCenter for Philanthropic
StudiesVU University Amsterdam
Giving in the Netherlands• A biennial survey among a
preselected pool of potential respondents recruited by polling institute TNS/NIPO
• Conducted since 1996• Repeated cross-sectional survey
until 2000• Panel study since 2002• Funded by several ministries of the
Dutch national government
Aims of GINPS1. “Who gives what and when?” Estimate
the volume and composition of charitable giving by households and volunteering by individuals
2. “How is it changing?” Describe trends in giving and volunteering sources and destinations
3. “Why do people give?” Analyze predictors and how they are changing over time
Trends in volunteering
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 old
2010 new
201205
101520253035404550
% of the population reporting volunteer activities
hours vol-unteers spent per month
Generalisations excluding migrants
Including migrants
“Methodology is Destiny”• How many questions, which
questions, and how you ask them determines the responses people give in a survey.
• Who asks, who you ask and how you ask people determines whether they respond to the survey at all.
6
What is the major source of error?
• Respondents, interviewers, survey designers or data-analists?
• The survey in the interview situation.• Social desirability is not a personality
characteristic; it is strongly dependent on the situation.
• People are more honest in private situations such as a written questionnaire or an online survey than in a phone/personal interview.
Modules in GINPS1. Prosocial values2. Charitable giving3. Individual helping and attitudes to
nonprofit organizations4. Volunteering5. Socio-demographics
The volunteering module• First we define volunteering for the
respondents: work without pay (at best a compensation) for an organization.
• We give a few examples.• We mention participation in activities and
membership as not being volunteering because it is not work.
• We do not mention social support and informal helping as not being volunteer work – people could do this as volunteers.
Area – Method module• AREA: first we list 18 different sectors
of organizations.• METHOD: then we list 12 different
tasks.• A method – Area module could further
increase the proportion of volunteers if it improves respondents recollections.
• The respondents’ employer is not identified in the module.
The Dutch volunteer profile• Older, smaller towns• Higher educated• More wealthy, own home• Religious: Catholic or Protestant• Social pressure in social context• Altruistic values, responsibility, trust• Confidence in charities
Volunteer motives• Current volunteers complete a
shortened version of the Volunteer Function Inventory (Clary et al.), Pride and Respect scales (Boezeman & Ellemers) and Ownership.
• Frequency of volunteering, hours, supervision of others
• Retrospective question for current non-volunteers: have you ever volunteered?
Motivation and motivated cognition
• If you ask volunteers ‘Why do you volunteer’ they may come up with all sorts of nice post hoc rationalizations.
• These reasons often refer to intrinsic motivations.
• If you ask non-volunteers ‘Why do you not volunteer’ they cite external circumstances.
• It is hard to tell how accurate these reasons are, but a positive social image bias is likely.
Who becomes a volunteer?• All respondents should answer
questions on predictors of entry and exit out of the volunteer work force.
• Mobilization: have you ever been asked to volunteer?
• Social norms: how self-evident is volunteering for people around you?
• Prosocial values: altruism, trust
Development of generalized social trust
2002 2004 20062.9
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5None
Quit
Started
Con-tinued
Bron: GINPS
Bekkers, R. (2012). ‘Trust and Volunteering: Selection or Causation? Evidence From a 4 Year Panel Study’. Political Behaviour, 32 (2): 225-247. DOI 10.1007/s11109-011-9165-x. (open access)
14
Careers in volunteering• If you ask all repondents
retrospective questions about volunteer activities you can map life history careers in volunteering.
• Comparisons with other careers can show how they are intertwined.
• Does achieving a higher level of education make people volunteer more?
• Does volunteering improve employability?
16
Volunteering and education
Proportion of respondents in the Family Survey of the Dutch Population reporting volunteer work at earlier ages by the highest
level of education achieved in the year 2000(Bekkers & Ruiter, 2008)
Two sources of bias
Civic duty
“Social desirability”
Lying
18
Total survey error
Sampling error: Volunteers are more likely to participate in
surveys
Measurement error:
Respondents exaggerate
volunteer activity
OVERESTIMATE of amounts donated
Or are volunteers ‘better’ respondents?
19
Accuracy of self-reportsNot reported Reported
Not volunteering in reality
True negative
False positive, overestimate
Volunteering in reality
False negative,underestimate
True positive,under- or overestimate
20
Errors in three phases
Irregular or episodic volunteering activity is not reported
Short survey is less likely to make respondents remember everything
Volunteer acts that did not occur (or occurred earlier) are reported, or the level of real volunteering activity is exaggerated
Underestimate
Overestimate
Net result?
The civic duty of survey response
• The lower the response rate, the higher the proportion of respondents saying they volunteer (Abraham, Helms & Presser, AJS 114(4): 1129-65, 2009).
• Post hoc solution: weight the data.• Include measures of civic duty behaviors
for which true population values are known, such as voting, charitable deduction, blood donation, organ donation
Volunteering and other helping
dona
ted m
oney
voted
help
while a
way
unpa
id su
rvey
parti
cipati
on
carri
ed it
ems
gave
food
to ho
meless
gave
bloo
d0
20406080
100
yesno
Contact• ‘Giving in the Netherlands’,
Philanthropic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, VU University Amsterdam: www.giving.nl
• René Bekkers, [email protected]• Blog: renebekkers.wordpress.com• Twitter: @renebekkers