sustainability at pepsico - jameskonderla.net · sustainability by striving “to deliver a...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 0
Sustainability at PepsiCo
Measuring Sustainability Performance and Practices against Coca-Cola
BUSINESS AND SOCIETY, FALL 2014
October 18, 2014
Authored by: James Konderla
Page 1
Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1
PepsiCo’s Sustainability Plan ....................................................................................................................... 1
Human Sustainability ................................................................................................................................ 2
Environmental Sustainability .................................................................................................................... 4
Talent Sustainability .................................................................................................................................. 7
Coca-Cola’s Sustainability Plan .................................................................................................................... 8
The Coca-Cola System ............................................................................................................................... 9
Comparison ................................................................................................................................................. 12
Human Sustainability .............................................................................................................................. 12
Environmental Sustainability .................................................................................................................. 12
Talent Sustainability ................................................................................................................................ 13
Thoughts from Porter and Kramer .......................................................................................................... 14
Conclusions and Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 14
Page 1
Introduction
PepsiCo and Coca-Cola are two of the leading companies in the soft drink/beverages
industries with a combined market share of over forty percent as of 2010 (7) and operations in
hundreds of countries around the world. As part of their operations, both companies have also
established sustainability programs and seek to provide sustainable operations in many areas.
Due to my current employment with PepsiCo I have decided that it is important to look at these
policies in order to better align myself with the company and its goals as compared to one of our
chief competitors: Coca-Cola. In the following sections I will outline PepsiCo’s sustainability
plan, called “Performance with Purpose” as well as Coca-Cola’s sustainability program, “The
Coca-Cola System” before comparing the plans and providing some recommendations to
PepsiCo as to the current and possibly future state of our sustainability programs.
PepsiCo’s Sustainability Plan
PepsiCo has a 3-tier plan for sustainability across all divisions that is led by the
Sustainability Task Force, chaired by the President of PepsiCo, and tasked with strategic
development of sustainability efforts in line with PepsiCo’s strategy and vision but also partners
with the leadership teams that oversee the three focus areas: human, environmental, and talent
sustainability (2). PepsiCo has a very simple name for this effort: Performance with Purpose. In
an effort to continuously improve sustainability efforts, the sustainability task force regularly
partners with stakeholders and conducts formal assessments to determine things that are
important in areas of societal, environmental and economic development and match these to
PepsiCo’s growth and strategic plans. As opposed to its chief competitors, PepsiCo not only
Page 2
holds share in the beverage industry but the snack foods industry as well (Figure 1) bringing a
unique set of challenges and opportunities for PepsiCo and its business partners.
Figure 1
In order to improve performance PepsiCo has established a very simple goal for
sustainability by striving “to deliver a superior, long-term, financial performance and sustained
shareholder value” (2, Page 9). In the following sections I will outline the three separate areas of
PepsiCo’s sustainability focus.
Human Sustainability
In 2009 PepsiCo began an effort in the human sustainability area to reduce the amount of
sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in several of their key global brands. This effort is
targeted to address several world-wide challenges, namely nutritional imbalances, obesity and
lifestyle-related diseases such as diabetes while also continuously refining PepsiCo’s food and
beverage choices to match consumer needs. To do this, PepsiCo developed the following three
goals for human sustainability (2, Page 13):
Reduce the average amount of saturated fats per serving in key global food brands, in key
countries, by 15 percent by 2020 against a 2006 baseline.
Page 3
Reduce the average amount of added sugars per serving in key global beverage brands, in
key countries, by 25 percent by 2020 against a 2006 baseline.
Reduce the average amount of sodium per serving in key global food brands, in key
countries, by 25 percent by 2020 against a 2006 baseline.
As you can see, PepsiCo has laid out some very challenging goals that, if they meet, will
allow PepsiCo to become much more sustainable. To do this, PepsiCo has divided its product
portfolio into three areas: Good-for-You (targeting foods that are in line with global dietary
standards), Better-for-You (targeting foods that have been improved to meet global dietary
standards), and Fun-for-You (targeting global and region-specific brands of treats). Dividing
brands into these three areas has helped PepsiCo to make tremendous progress towards its 2020
goals, as outlined below:
Saturated fat – as of 2013 on a global average, per-serving, basis saturated fats have
seen a reduction of three percent with a removal of two thousand one hundred metric tons
of saturated fats compared with the 2006 baseline. PepsiCo has further made progress by
changing several parts of the manufacture process such as the use of sunflower and other
oils as opposed to cottonseed oil used in the manufacturing process of chips and snacks.
Added sugars – as of 2013, compared to a 2006 baseline, PepsiCo has removed four
hundred and two thousand metric tons of added sugars from their product portfolio in
North America and introduced several low-sugar brands both domestically and globally.
This area has been of particular challenge due to consumer preferences but that has
recently begun change due to a global consumer shifts to low-sugar alternatives.
Sodium per serving – As of 2013, compared to 2006 baselines, PepsiCo has reduced
sodium per serving by nine percent and removed more than one thousand seven hundred
Page 4
metric tons of sodium from key global brands. In addition, three thousand nine hundred
metric tons of sodium was removed from the total foods portfolio.
In addition to advances in the above areas, PepsiCo continues to have a strong research and
development presence towards not just new products but improvements to current ones as well.
Environmental Sustainability
In the area of environmental sustainability PepsiCo has not only seen areas of
improvement for itself but has also noticed ways in which it can better partner with local and
international authorities to recycle and re-use waste products and leftovers from manufacturing.
To better identify and develop these opportunities PepsiCo partners with business, academia, and
NGOs and is actively involved in the United Nations Global Compact, the World Business
Council for Sustainability Development, and the 2030 Water Resources Group as well as several
other international organizations. From these meetings PepsiCo has developed the following five
areas to focus its environmental sustainability efforts:
Help protect and conserve global water supplies, especially in water-stressed areas, and
provide access to safe water.
Innovate packaging to make it increasingly sustainable and minimize impact on the
environment.
Work to eliminate solid waste to landfills from production facilities.
Work to achieve an absolute reduction in greenhouse gas emissions across all global
business areas.
Continue to support sustainable agriculture by expanding best practices with growers and
suppliers.
Page 5
PepsiCo has made real, measurable strides toward these goals compared to 2006 baselines. In
2009 PepsiCo commissioned a 2030 Future Scenarios project to determine areas for
opportunities in development as well as health risks globally over the next two decades. This
plan shed light into areas of local and global significance and helped develop sustainability
initiatives globally for the company. Due to the continuous nature of environmental
sustainability PepsiCo has not placed hard numbers on these efforts but has made numerous
advancements:
Resource Conservation – PepsiCo developed a program that applies global best
practices to water and resource conservation. In 2013, with the help of eighty Resource
Conservation groups around the world, PepsiCo identified improvements resulting in
fifteen million dollars of savings. In 2012 PepsiCo was awarded the Stockholm Industry
Water Award and the U.S. Water Prize and in 2013 were awarded the Corporate Climate
Adaption Award. PepsiCo has optimized water efficiency systems and has saved over six
hundred and forty thousand dollars while reducing water consumption by two hundred
thousand cubic meters per year in the U.S. alone. Advancements globally have also
driven a “total systems” approach and have enabled PepsiCo to use a combination of
technologies to provide potable water that can be re-used in manufacturing. One example
of this is in India, where PepsiCo has assisted in the creation of programs that enabled the
harvesting and purification of over five billion liters of water through a combination of
projects including water purification, construction of dams and rainwater harvesting.
Packaging, Recycling and Waste Reduction – In 2010 PepsiCo began to develop a
detailed Life Cycle Analysis of U.S. beverage packaging. Due to this analysis PepsiCo
was able to identify areas for reducing energy use, water consumption and emissions.
Page 6
PepsiCo became the first company to include post-consumer goods in its beverage
containers, as well as developing lightweight packaging. In 2013 Frito-Lay North
America was able to eliminate eleven million pounds of flexible film packaging, the
equivalent to six and a half billion one-ounce single-serve bags, by improving package
sealing techniques. In the same year a system conversion was completed for the Gatorade
line of products resulting in a change to lighter weight secondary packaging and a
reduction of thirty nine million packaging pounds on an annual basis.
Waste Reduction – In 2010 PepsiCo set a goal of partnering to increase the U.S.
average-container recycling rate to fifty percent by 2018. Since the launch of this
program PepsiCo has increased recycling rates of major container materials from thirty
four to forty two percent. In 2013 PepsiCo further invested in this program resulting in
the recycling of eighteen million pounds and three hundred twenty four million
containers. In Canada, the 7Up brand of products has seen a switch to one hundred
percent post-consumer recycled products used in container production.
Greenhouse Gases (GHG) – As a result of focusing on reduced energy use and
employing alternative fuels PepsiCo has reduced direct and indirect GHG emissions by
two percent compared to 2008. This reduction was achieved despite a production volume
growth of nine percent for foods and seventeen percent for beverages. Energy efficiency
programs and initiatives have helped to achieve an improvement of four percent energy
efficiency from 2012 to 2013 with a 9.6 percent improvement in energy efficiency from
the beverage business and a steady 1.4 percent improvement from the food business unit.
PepsiCo has also invested in alternative energies in many different markets such as India,
where PepsiCo has seen a dramatic increase from ten to seventy percent renewability in
Page 7
energy by using rice hulls to cook chips and Brazil, where a switch to oat hulls has
yielded a forty one percent reduction in energy use.
Sustainable Agriculture – As agriculture represents more than seventy percent of the
world’s water, twenty to thirty percent of GHG emissions and forty percent of global
employment PepsiCo sees a critical need to improve the sustainability of agriculture. The
Sustainability Farming Initiative (SRI) was developed by PepsiCo to encourage not only
the company but also growers to reduce environmental and social impacts while
maintaining viability in farming and agriculture. The SRI was piloted in 2011 and 2012
and officially rolled out in 2013 with a current deployment of three hundred thousand
acres in North America, which encompasses PepsiCo’s corn and potatoes suppliers, and
has a goal to increase deployment to five hundred thousand by 2016. As part of this
initiative PepsiCo has rolled out a land policy with zero tolerance for illegal activities in
the supply chain and zero tolerance for land displacements of any legitimate land tenure
holders, building on already existing policies of supplier conduct, sustainability in
agriculture, and environmental health and safety.
Talent Sustainability
Rated consistently as one of the world’s top companies to work for (5) PepsiCo not only
recognizes their multi-talented workforce but actively works to sustain this talent and provide
pathways to have not only a job but a career by providing areas for personal and professional
development. PepsiCo has made great strides in growing a more diverse culture, especially
among women leaders, and continues to provide a safe and happy workplace. PepsiCo’s health
and safety standards have seen a decrease of forty seven percent for the lost-time injury rate
between 2011 and 2013 and the certification of 65 plants as OSHAS 18001-certified. Of course
Page 8
part of talent sustainability is both encouraging and providing ways for employees to become
active so PepsiCo has pushed to include on-site health and wellness activities with a ninety
percent adoption rate across markets. In order to provide employees with a well-rounded career
experience PepsiCo offers mandatory annual code of conduct training to employees and
suppliers.
One of the most important things though is to provide a way for work and life to balance
for each and every employee. PepsiCo not only supports volunteering but encourages it through
diversity and inclusion groups, company fundraising drives and contests. PepsiCo also promotes
educational assistance for employees and even requires employees at all levels to seek continued
education either through classes offered internally or through external course offerings. The most
important implementation at PepsiCo, though, is the “One Simple Thing”: each employee is
tasked to work with their manager to determine one simple thing they can do to better adjust
work-life balance with some examples being the ability to adjust schedules around children’s
school activities or the ability to work from home (in some cases up to 100% of the time).
Coca-Cola’s Sustainability Plan
As you can see from the above section, PepsiCo has a very robust Sustainability plan.
How does that plan stack up against its competitors, though? In order to best answer this
question I will attempt to briefly summarize the sustainability plan of an age old competitor of
PepsiCo: Coca-Cola Inc. This summary will be based on the 2011/2012 published GRI report
that Coca-Cola Inc. has made available and will be limited to a basic summary as compared to
the more comprehensive summary of PepsiCo, the focus of this paper.
Page 9
The Coca-Cola System
As opposed to PepsiCo, Coca-Cola defines their sustainability plan as “The Coca-Cola
System” (4). This system includes bottlers, partners, suppliers, and the company itself and
operates in over two hundred countries. Coca-Cola does not stop there, though: their plan also
has a place for participation from their customers as well because Coca-Cola realizes that their
customers are the key to success in their sustainability efforts. Coca-Cola uses a science-based
approach to sustainability, keeping themselves up-to-date on current research and making
decisions based on science instead of public beliefs or concerns; bringing a good deal of
controversy for these stances. As part of these efforts Coca-Cola highlights the following:
Active Healthy Living – Coca-Cola actively promotes exercise and fitness as well as
providing the information and products that enables customers to make healthy choices.
They also work to actively combat malnutrition in countries around the world by
providing nourishing goods in the form of their Nurisha and Juice Master brands.
Product Safety and Quality – Coca-Cola has taken strong stances in product safety,
namely in the use of BPA and biotechnology. Despite consumer concerns, Coca-Cola
continues to use BPA in products, stating that the levels of BPA exposure and its
widespread use in coating containers worldwide do not pose a health risk to the general
population. They have also taken the stance of using biotechnology due to the value
savings and safety as determined by the FDA and World Health Organization.
Responsible Marketing – Coca-Cola has taken strong stances in this area by not
marketing directly to children and not showing children in commercials or marketing
material without the supervision of a parent. They have also implemented a Global
School Beverage Guideline program and do not offer their products in grade schools
Page 10
unless asked to do so, also agreeing to withdraw products if asked. Coca-Cola is also a
founding member of the Weight Commitment Foundation and actively works with others
in the industry to fight obesity.
Women’s Economic Empowerment – Coca-Cola actively works to promote the
economic empowerment of women through entrepreneurial efforts across the globe.
Through their 5by20 plan Coca-Cola seeks to empower five million women by 2020, a
goal which has already seen one hundred and thirty one thousand woman entrepreneurs
come through the program since its inception in 2011. Coca-Cola also actively recruits
women into all levels of the company and provides training to make them successful in
their new roles.
Human and Workplace Rights – Coca-Cola strictly adheres to the United Nations
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Labor Organization’s
Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work with a Zero tolerance policy
for suppliers, third parties, or employees who violate these rights. Coca-Cola worked
with the U.N. in developing the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights,
which saw adoption in 2011 and believes that one of the only ways a business can
succeed in the global marketplace is by providing fair and equitable treatment to all
employees internal and external to the company.
Water Stewardship – Recognizing the global significance of water, Coca-Cola has set a
goal to “assess vulnerabilities in quality and quantity of water sources for each of their
bottling plants and implement locally relevant water resource programs by 2020” (4,
Page 68) as well improving manufacturing efficiency by twenty percent compared to a
2004 baseline. By the end of 2011 a little over seventy percent had completed the
Page 11
vulnerability assessment, sixty seven percent has completed source water protection
plans, and twenty nine percent were scheduled to begin their vulnerability assessments.
Coca-Cola has achieved their efficiency goals as of 2011 and is actively working to
return a level of water to the environment that would enable the continued development
of aquatic life.
Energy Efficiency and Climate Protection – Coca-Cola seeks to grow their business
through 2015 without growing carbon emissions as compared to their 2004 baseline. To
assist in this, they have set a goal to reduce absolute emissions from manufacturing in
developed countries by five percent by 2015 with a current (as of 2011) rate of four
percent. Further, Coca-Cola has set a goal to make all new cold-drink equipment be HFC-
free with an interim goal to achieve fifty percent by 2012 and a goal to reduce energy
consumption of equipment used to refrigerate cold drinks by forty percent. As of 2011
Coca-Cola had achieved a twenty four percent HFC-free rating and have already met
their goal of energy reduction in refrigeration.
Sustainable Packaging – Coca-Cola has set a goal to improve material efficiency per
liter of product sold by seven percent compared with a 2008 baseline as well as being
able to recover fifty percent of cans and bottles annually and an increase of twenty five
percent in the use of PET plastic from recycled or renewable materials by 2015. As of
2011, though, Coca-Cola has met none of these goals but has seen a increase in PET
plastic from recycled goods by five percent and an estimation of thirty seven percent of
cans recovered after going to the market.
Page 12
Comparison
Now that we have outlined the plans of both PepsiCo and Coca-Cola we can begin to
compare the sustainability plans of the two. As you can see, both companies have set lofty goals
that may or may not be achievable but which benefit the world overall. Just as PepsiCo has done,
I have divided this comparison into three distinct groups: human sustainability, environmental
sustainability, and talent sustainability.
Human Sustainability
In the realm of human sustainability we find both companies have set very good goals.
While PepsiCo and Coca-Cola have both made measurable progress towards these goals, I feels
that PepsiCo currently stands as having made a larger impact than Coca-Cola due primarily to
the fact that they operate in more markets as well as offering both drink and food. This provides
a unique opportunity for PepsiCo in the combat of malnourishment around the world. Coca-
Cola’s human sustainability appears to be primarily focused around education and, even though
they have also participated in other areas and are actively assisting in poverty-stricken countries
PepsiCo still appears stronger in this area. I would like to see PepsiCo continue to thrive in this
area but recommend that they continue introducing better selections for healthy snacks,
especially in the United States.
Environmental Sustainability
In the area of Environmental Sustainability both companies have set very respectable
goals but Coca-Cola easily pulls ahead. PepsiCo, while seeking to make a bigger impact with
their goals has set the bar a little too high, whereas Coca-Cola has already met several of theirs
compared to baselines by setting expectations lower. I definitely feels that PepsiCo is making a
Page 13
large impact but it also appears that they may be spreading themselves a little too thin by trying
to meet all of these lofty goals with one exception: PepsiCo has made a much larger impact in
water conservation and sustainable agriculture through their offerings of programs and
partnerships, whereas Coca-Cola has done little in this area beyond assessing their current state.
Although Coca-Cola pulls ahead, it is definitely worth mentioning that if PepsiCo can meet their
current goals they will have made a larger impact in the environmental sustainability region than
Coca-Cola.
Talent Sustainability
As any good manager knows, a company is only as strong as its employees and in order
to meet goals and deadlines, whether they are financial goals or sustainability goals, a company
must strive to provide a safe, happy, workplace and sustain their current talent in addition to
recruiting new talent. In the area of talent sustainability there is one clear winner: PepsiCo. Both
companies provide a competitive work environment in terms of salary, workplace safety, and
equitable rights but PepsiCo has shown to provide much more than that by striving to provide
employees a way to better balance their work and home lives. PepsiCo’s “One Simple Thing”
methodology does much more than this, though by providing employees a way to tie volunteer
and community service directly into their work performance. The fact that Coca-Cola spends so
little time on this area in their report (beyond declaring the amounts of money or time donated to
charitable organizations) shows just how many opportunities in this area that they are missing.
The fact that PepsiCo allows employees to count volunteer work towards their own objectives as
well as the company goals shows that PepsiCo not only cares about the amount of volunteered
time and money but the quality of volunteer work done.
Page 14
Thoughts from Porter and Kramer
As part of my “Business and Society” course I was exposed to an article by two authors
titled “Strategy & Society” (8) that provided excellent insights into competitive advantage and
corporate social responsibility (CSR). PepsiCo has done a very good job of not only identifying
and prioritizing social issues but has been able to translate these issues into tangible goals that
the company can address. According to Porter and Kramer the role of the value chain is to
“mitigate harm from value chain activities” and, according to the GRI reports from both PepsiCo
and Coca-Cola both companies have taken great strides to do that. PepsiCo has managed to do
this, though, without sacrificing growth and has seen an increase of revenues as of late but it is
important that both companies, especially PepsiCo, realize that not only are sustainability goals
meant to help society and the business but that a company is not responsible for solving the
world’s problems. By looking at the GRI report for PepsiCo it becomes apparent that PepsiCo
may not fully understand this main point as their goals appear to be much larger than competitors
and, while providing a large impact upon completion, are currently falling short of meeting
quotas and expectations. At first glance it appears that PepsiCo may be spreading itself too thin
and dedicating too much towards sustainability efforts which can lead to issues for all involved.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Although both companies show very strong sustainability plans and goals there are a few
things that worry me about this area for PepsiCo that I would like to address. The first is
PepsiCo’s environmental sustainability goals: it appears that they may have set the bar too high
and reached too far with these goals. Doing this means that PepsiCo may not make these goals
and brings to mind that PepsiCo may want to re-think these metrics in order to provide more of a
Page 15
quality sustainability program instead of a larger program; as was stated in the comparison
section, sustainability is not just about the quantity but the quality of programs as well. While
Coca-Cola does not appear to respond as readily to consumer wants and needs, as demonstrated
by their scientific approach in many areas, PepsiCo has shown to be able to respond quickly and
effectively to the recent shift towards healthier, more sustainable, lifestyles. I would also
recommend expanding PepsiCo’s sustainable packaging technologies into other areas of the
company as well and not isolating them to the Sun Chips brand of foods (6), as this could
provide a very large win to our environmental and human sustainability areas. Lastly, it is
recommended that PepsiCo expand or elaborate more on their sustainability of women in the
workplace. As evidenced by our current CEO, Indra Nooyi, PepsiCo not only recognizes the
equality of women leaders but also the power and strength that they provide to a company. The
GRI posting for PepsiCo, however does not properly give justice to these programs in the same
way Coca-Cola does. Overall, though it is refreshing to see two companies with differing
viewpoints that have chosen to address some of the world’s biggest problems: obesity, famine
and malnutrition, environmental sustainability, and even water conservation and definitely helps
me continue to feel empowered to help us meet our goals either in my current or future roles at
PepsiCo.
Page 16
References
1. Environmental Sustainability. (2014, September 23). Retrieved November 1, 2014, from
http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Environmental-Sustainability.html
2. PepsiCo Releases 2013 Sustainability and GRI Reports. (n.d.). Retrieved November 1,
2014, from http://www.ethicalperformance.com/reports/view/983
3. Coca-Cola Enterprises has published its 2011/2012 CR and Sustainability Report. (n.d.).
Retrieved November 1, 2014, from http://ethicalperformance.com/reports/view/714
4. The Coca-Cola Sustainability Project. (n.d.). Retrieved November 1, 2014, from
http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/index.html
5. #11: PepsiCo. (n.d.). Retrieved November 9, 2014, from
http://www.greatplacetowork.com/best-companies/worlds-best-multinationals/profiles-
of-the-winners/1526-11-pepsico
6. Siranosian, K. (2010, February 22). New SunChips Bag: 90% Plant-based, 100%
Compostable. Retrieved November 11, 2014, from
http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/02/new-sunchips-bag-compostable/
7. Carbonated Soft Drinks: Is Demand Fizzing Out? (2010, August 1). Retrieved November
11, 2014, from http://www.accuval.net/insights/industryinsights/detail.php?ID=193
8. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006, January 1). Strategy and Society:Â The Link Between
Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved November 11,
2014, from https://hbr.org/2006/12/strategy-and-society-the-link-between-competitive-
advantage-and-corporate-social-responsibility/ar/1