sustainability certification a drop in the ocean or real ... · 1 sustainability certification a...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Sustainability Certification A Drop in the Ocean or Real Impact?
Gernot Klepper
Kiel Institute for the World Economy ISCC e.V.
6. ISCC Global Sustainability Conference Brussels, 17. Feb. 2015
2
Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutriFon and promote sustainable agriculture
Take urgent acFon to combat climate change and its impacts
Sustainably manage forests, combat deserFficaFon, halt and reverse land degradaFon, halt biodiversity loss
The 17 Sustainable Developments Goals (SDGs) of the UN require substanFal changes in land use and a balancing of conflicFng objecFves
3
These SDGs require a careful balancing of different objecFves in biomass use CerFficaFon is one way of securing this! However, only a small share of biomass is cerFfied by independent cerFficaFon schemes
Although liVle informaFon is available on the share of cerFfied biomass: • Appr. 20 percent of Palm • Appr. 2 percent of soy
Some part of biomass producFon is controlled through internal quality requirements of companies. Their extent and relevance for the SDGs is largely unknown.
ISCC has conducted a survey on the impact of its cerFficaFon A sample amounFng to 27% of all ISCC cerFfied First Gathering Point (FGPs) was taken, i.e. informaFon from 6317 Farms out of a total of 23 072 cerFfied farms was invesFgated. The good news: 78.8% of all FGPs had regular risk level! Only 7% were considered „high risk“.
4
Out of 325 audited farms, 1.097 violaFons of 54 ISCC-‐Requirements occured (383 Major Must Non-‐ConformiFes and 714 Minor Must Non-‐ConformiFes) However, most of them have been corrected!
2
471
321 294
2 7 0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
1 2 3 4 5 6
Num
ber
of n
on-c
onfo
rmiti
es
ISCC principles
Number of non-conformities under ISCC principles 1 to 6
Env
ironm
enta
lly re
spon
sibl
e pr
oduc
tion
Hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y of
w
orke
rs
Soc
ial r
espo
nsib
le
prod
uctio
n
Com
plia
nce
with
re
gion
al a
nd n
atio
nal l
aw
Goo
d m
anag
emen
t pra
ctic
e
Land
-bas
ed s
usta
inab
ility
crit
eria
5 Source: Mauser, Klepper et al. (2015) Nature CommunicaFons
Yield PotenFals on current cropland
The intensificaFon and expansion of agriculture to meet future demand needs Sustainability CerFficaFon that covers all biomass and includes social sustainability
6 Source: Delzeit, Zabel et al. (2015) in „Regional Environmental Change“
In addiFon: Hot spots and cold spots of ecosystem services should be considered when markets demand an expansion of cropland. Red Hot Spots need to be avoided Pink cold spots offer expansion without ecologic damage
7
The Message from the CerFficaFon of Biofuels: • It is currently only a „growing drop“ in the ocean • Within the drop there is real impact • The experience with cerFficaFon for biofuels is:
• It is feasible • It is effecFve • It is affordable
• For meeFng the SDGs of the United NaFons and for securing a sustainable inensificaFon and expansion of agriculture, cerFficaFon is probably the only way to inform about land use pracFces and to ascertain their sustainability.