sustainability of ganesha park pomona, californiatgyoung/pom_parks/sustainability of ganesha...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Sustainability of Ganesha Park
Pomona, California
Professor Terry Young
Parks and Protected Areas
GEO 435
Tues/ Thurs @ 3pm-4:50pm
By: Christopher Edmunson
2
Introduction
The term sustainability is relatively unknown to the city of Pomona and only until
recently there has been a myriad of new studies and information that are beginning to surface.
Currently, there is very little information and data on the topic of sustainability at Ganesha Park.
Many college students, scientists and geographers are having a difficult time conducting
experiments and compiling data in order to
generate an accurate study or report on the
subject. We will begin to explore the relationship
between sustainability and Ganesha Park in
Pomona, California as well as how these two are
intertwined with each other. The goal of this research paper is to indentify whether or not
Ganesha Park is a sustainable public park. When it comes to a sustainable area or region, there
are three aspects that need to be taken into account. The three aspects of sustainability are
environmental, social and economic. In addition, this research paper will potentially fill the gap
between the lack of available information on sustainability and the people in need of this
material.
Background of Sustainability
The term sustainability can be defined as a variety of things to different people because
depending on where one lives sustainability can mean different things. Over the past 30 years,
the concept of sustainability has evolved to reflect both the public and private sectors. In the case
of sustainability the definition often begins with the environment, however it can be defined
using the social and economical aspects as well. When trying to define sustainability as a concept
3
it can be a difficult task and needs to be explained in a
multitude of ways. One possible definition is that
sustainability is a series of policies and procedures that
meet society’s present needs without compromising
the ability of future generations to meet their own
needs (EPA.gov, 2011). This definition can be
explained as a set of rules that can be implemented in
order to meet the public’s current needs without damaging future generations’ ability to meet
their own needs. Another possible definition of sustainability is exploring all three aspects of
sustainability. The term sustainability extends far past the environmental aspect and eventually
encompasses the social and economic aspects as well. While the discussion and debate of
sustainability often begins with the environment, we also need to include the social and
economic considerations (Byler, 2008).
In order to provide a comprehensive study on the sustainability of Ganesha Park one must
properly define what the term sustainability really means. In this study, we will explore the three
aspects of sustainability. Sustainability contains three aspects which include the environmental,
social and economic aspects (Byler, 2008). However simple this one definition may seem there
are many sub-categories that are involved within these three aspects that need to be addressed.
Sustainable parks are often categorized by their use of green techniques such as solar power
systems and rain water reuse for irrigation purposes. In addition, sustainable parks employ the
best techniques and management practices to ensure the healthiest ecosystem; they do not waste
limited resources, recycle various products as much as possible and enhancing the environment
while not degrading it at the same time (Cranz, 2011). The best explanation of sustainability
http://www.townofeagle.org/images/pages/N254//
sustainability2.gif
4
would optimally include both possible definitions. To this day however, the ambiguous term
commonly known as sustainability is extremely flexible and has been debated for many years
and may never be truly defined as a whole but can possibly be defined by the individual.
History of Ganesha Park
Ganesha Park is a public park located in sunny southern California in the beautiful city of
Pomona. The first settlers were Mexican Pioneers that originally stayed on the lands that
eventually became Ganesha Park. Originally, the Pomona valley was inhabited by Gabrielenos
Indians and in the 1700s where it was commonly referred to as Rancho San Jose. There used to
be a Native American Rancheria in place where the current picnic tables are located. A year later
the Rancho became part of the San Gabriel Mission system and was used for pasture and grazing
lands. Fifty years later the lands were eventually sold to two Mexican solders, Palomares and
Vejar. In 1875, Vejar sold a portion of his land grant to a group of speculators and these
speculators renamed the area Pomona after the Roman goddess of fruit and fruit trees (Bitter,
2011). Eventually the land was inhabited by farmers and various agricultural industries and it
forever reshaped the region. Many people such as farmers, carpenters, contractors and plasterers
were influential in the construction and establishment of
Ganesha Park. These included a variety of men the
comprised of. The first of many men was named Moses
Petty who was from the Midwest and moved to Pomona
in 1887 to help lay out the grounds for the current
Ganesha Park. The second man was named Ernest D. Ferree who was the head of contracting
business of plastering in Pomona and became an expert at exterior plastering. Ferree came to
5
Pomona in 1911 and due to his experience at exterior construction and plastering, he played an
important role in the construction of Ganesha Park Greek Theatre (Brackett, 1920). In addition to
Ferree, a man by the name of G.H. Waters, who was an avid city developer, contributed to the
construction of the community theatre as well. Chairmen Joseph Morgan Page was the chairman
of the Parks, Roads and Improvement Committee of the Chamber of Commerce in Pomona and
he too helped conceive the idea for the Ganesha Park Greek Theatre in 1909 (Brackett, 1920).
Morgan Page was not only responsible for Ganesha Park but the popular sister parks of Lincoln
Park and Garfield Park not far away. Eventually the part of the area currently known as Ganesha
Public Park was developed into the Ganesha Park Tract by real estate developer Fredrick W.
Ritter (Brackett, 1920).
Although agriculture played a pivotal role in the economy of Pomona for many years
other vigorous enterprises businesses grew and prospered. These other enterprises include
community centers, public pools, youth centers and public parks. In the city of Pomona there are
over 2,000 acres of public land used for recreation facilities and within these 2,000 acres there
are 23 public parks (Bitter, 2011). At 60 acres, Ganesha Public Park is the largest public park in
Pomona only behind Washington Park. The park contains many drinking fountains, 103 picnic
tables, tennis courts, a public pool and 7 barbeque grills. It has the title of being Pomona’s oldest
park with the only 120 year old Eucalyptus and 250 year old redwood tree grove in southern
California (Villageprofile.com, 2009). Even to this day, Ganesha Park is constantly developing
and adapting to accommodate future generations by updating facilities, uses and purposes.
6
Methods
In order to provide an accurate conclusion on the thesis whether or not Ganesha Park is a
sustainable public park community, I will implement many forms of analysis and deciphering
techniques. When approaching the topic of sustainability, one must use with caution and be sure
not to discredit any factor small or large that otherwise might hinder the experiment void or
inaccurate. In this research project I will conduct the following tests, experiments and visual
evidence taking techniques in order to convey my point.
Since there is relatively no information or data on sustainability at Ganesha Park, a more
hands on approach was necessary to collect data and
information. While collecting data I had to keep in mind the
three aspects of sustainability. The three aspects are
environmental, social and economical. A sustainable
community or ecosystem has to contain a synergy of all
three aspects in order to be classified as a sustainable region
(Sauri, 2009). To commence my study at Ganesha Park, I
visited the park with a camera and a notebook and
wandered the grounds while keeping in mind the aspects of
sustainability. In addition to doing my own data collecting,
I discussed with Professor Young about the possible ways
to gauge the types of fountains at the park without any bias in the choice of fountains. There are
many drinking fountains on the park grounds so I had to pick 10 at random by assigning numbers
to them and choose 5 using a random number generator from the internet. My goal was to see
which fountains were implementing “low-flow” faucet heads as well as the bathroom facilities.
7
In addition to the water at the drinking fountains I observed the irrigation systems and irrigation
timing as well. I wanted to observe the time at which the sprinkler system was irrigating the large
amounts of grass because night time is the most efficient time to water any type of vegetation.
While visiting the park I noticed there was a public pool that had very large pool pumps so I
wanted to see when and how the pumps functioned. I also walked around the park to see what
kind of waste receptacles the park was using whether it is trash or recycling bins, because
recycling and reusing is a key part of sustainability. While walking around the park I saw that
there is a child playground there which could be a possible source of sustainability by using
certain materials and techniques.
In addition to all the physical aspects of sustainability I wanted to investigate the other
two aspects of sustainability, which include the social and economical aspects. At Ganesha Park
the social aspect is very apparent simply due to it being a public park. I wanted to investigate
how the park implements the social side of sustainability by seeing how the park was being used
for the public good. In order for a park to be sustainable in the social aspect of sustainability, it
needs to have a certain level of multi-functionality. The more functions an ecosystem or region
offers the more sustainable that particular region can be. When it comes to the economic aspect,
Ganesha Park does make it difficult for one attain data, so I will be going to the park and to see
what income the park attains and in addition, what costs the park has towards the community and
the city of Pomona.
Results
After completing my gathering of the data and necessary information in order to prove
whether or not Ganesha Park is sustainable, my findings were not very surprising. When I first
8
visited Ganesha Park, I had some pretty low expectations as a result of my first impressions of
the park. After doing the research and data gathering, my expectations and first impressions were
not far off from the results of my research. Initially, the first thing that I saw at the park was the
exuberant amount of vegetation and the large tracts of grass. The reason why the large amount of
grass and vegetation are a negative trait park design is because they require large amounts of
water. After a careful observation, the vegetation, grass and plants in the park are not plants
native to California. In order for
Ganesha Park to be considered a
sustainable ecosystem, the park
needs to use California native
plants which in turn use small
amounts water and are drought
resistant (Byler, 2008). In addition
to not using native California plants, the timing of irrigation of said plants is also crucial. I
visited Ganesha Park at the peak of the daily temperature around mid-day and to my surprise I
witnessed the grass being irrigated. A common technique of watering plants in the evening is the
most efficient technique to get the most from your water supply (West, 2006). Another thing that
I researched at the park was to see if the park was implementing the use of recycling receptacles
in addition to their current trash cans. To my astonishment the park had zero recycling bins and
only had trash cans for the patrons to use. Recycling is yet another aspect of sustainability that
needs to be addressed in order for a region to be considered sustainable (Cranz, 2011). On the
topic of irrigation and water usage, Ganesha Park is one of the two public parks in Pomona that
has a public pool, the other is Washington Park (Villageprofile.com, 2009). I visited the park in
9
the months of March and April, and in California these months are not optimal swimming
months. The temperature on the day of one of my visits was quite chilly and it was almost
raining. Not to my disappointment, the public pool facilities were closed and the pool was not in
use. However, even though the pool was not in use, the pool pump cleaning system was running.
Based on what I have learned about sustainability and park design, the pool pumps being on year
around, even though no citizens are using the
facilities, are in violation of sustainable
characteristics.
When it comes to the playground
equipment at public parks, people often
overlook this small fact; small factors such as play ground material are very important to the
sustainability of a public park. What I noticed about the play ground at Ganesha Park is that the
park utilizes sand instead of recycled material for ground cover underneath the jungle gym and
monkey bars. Sand needs to be either taken from another natural source or more commonly
needs to be manufactured using processes heavy on power and energy usage. In the same area of
the play ground and also around the picnic and tennis areas, there are many light poles with
incandescent light bulbs. In eco-friendly and sustainable park design, these lights need to be
converted to compact fluorescent light bulbs or light emitting diodes (LED’s). Compact
fluorescent light bulbs use 75% less energy than standard incandescent light bulbs and LED’s are
even more efficient (EnergyStar.com, 2011).
The other aspects of sustainability and park design that need to be addressed are the
economical and social aspects. Since Ganesha Park is a public park, it is used by the public at no
costs to the citizens of Pomona. Due to this characteristic, the park has very limited income and
10
has more expenses from what I observed. After many failed attempts at contacting city officials
and various financial and park offices, I found myself having to visually inspect possible costs
toward the city. One of the major things that I found was that the public park section of Ganesha
Park was well maintained and manicured. I witnessed one public maintenance truck that I
assumed was a grounds keeper of some type. The city has to pay for upkeep on the truck as well
as equipment and salary for the worker. Another aspect of costs toward the city was the lighting
of the park. As stated earlier, the compact fluorescent bulbs save energy as well as money.
Compact fluorescent light bulbs and L.E.D.s can save the city of Pomona around $40 per bulb
over the life time of the bulb (EnergyStar.com, 2011). If the park chose to implement these
changes and convert their current bulbs, the city could save a substantial amount of money in the
years to come.
Additionally, for a region or ecosystem to be socially sustainable, the park needs to be
multi-functional and serve as form of social cohesion or a source for gathering. Ganesha Park
excels at this trait in various forms of
public attractions, large amounts of
space and many utilities for public
use. While visiting the park I
recorded a couple of public
institutions that could possibility
improve social interactions and cohesion; these institutions include a public pool, a play ground
and in the past a city festival. A public pool can improve community education levels by
teaching children and adults to swim safely as well as friendly swimming meets and competition.
A playground can teach children how to interact with each other and help increase the cognitive
11
abilities and puzzle solving of youths. Finally, Pomona used to host a yearly festival at Ganesha
Park where hundreds of citizens would gather to interact and form important relationships.
Ganesha Park implements this last trait of sustainability very well and much room for
improvement can happen in the environmental and economical aspects.
Conclusion
Sustainability is a relatively modern term in today’s world and only until recently, the
concept has become more mainstream. When it comes to Pomona’s largest and most popular
public park, Ganesha Park is just brushing the surface on its potential to be a true sustainable
environment. Many characteristics of Ganesha Park are not sustainable; however there is much
room for improvements in this sector. The aspects that need improvements and that are lacking
in abundance are the economical and environmental aspects. The city of Pomona and Ganesha
Park has massive potential for improvement in two of the three aspects of sustainability. I feel
that one of the major reasons why Ganesha Park is not fulfilling its massive potential at being
sustainable is that of economics and government funding. Many problems that need to be
addressed to fulfill the requirements of sustainability are quite expensive and require large
amounts of capital and investors. However, small corrections can be made in order to fulfill these
needs; these small corrections can simply be the installation of energy efficient lights bulbs, low
flow water faucets in the sinks and drinking fountains, the maximizing of the irrigation output for
native, drought resistant vegetation and the installation of recycling receptacles around the park.
With the collaborative efforts from Pomona’s city officials and the common citizen, Ganesha
Park can exceed expectations while being the leading pioneer in the field of sustainability. These
12
tools to create a sustainable environment may seem small and insignificant but they can have
huge and positive repercussions that guide the way to a sustainable ecosystem.
13
Works Cited
1) "Basic Information | Sustainability | US EPA." US Environmental Protection Agency. US
Government, 2 Mar. 2011. Web. 21 May 2011. http://www.epa.gov/sustainability/basicinfo.htm.
2) Bitter, Darleen. “California Historic Route 66 Association.” A Brief History of Pomona, CA. 2011.
Web. 22 May 2011. http://www.route66ca.org/traveler/towns/25pomona/history.html.
3) Brackett, Frank Parkhurst. "History of Pomona Valley, California ... - Google Books."Google Books.
Version 1. Historic Record Company, 1920. Web. 21 May 2011.
http://books.google.com/books?id=3W4UAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA95&l.
4) Byler, Tara. "Sustainable Park Design." Designing In the Green: An Approach to Sustainable Park
Design 64.2 (2008): 32. CPRS.org. Spring 2008. Web. 21 May 2011.
http://www.cprs.org/membersonly/Spring08_GreenDesign.htm.
5) Cranz, Galen. “Sustainable Parks.” What is a Sustainable Park? 2011. 22 May 2011.
http://www.horseshoefarm.org/sustainable_parks.htm.
6) “Light Bulbs (CFLs), Did You Know?” Energystar.gov. 2011. Web. 1 June 2011.
http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=find_a_product.showProductGroup&pgw_code=L
B.
7) "Pomona Park District, Pomona Recreation, Pomona Fairplex, Pomona Golf." VillageProfile.com.
Community Network Profile, 2009. Web. 22 May 2011.
http://www.villageprofile.com/california/pomona/07/topic.html.
8) Sauri, David, Marc Pares, and Elena Domene. "CHANGING CONCEPTIONS OF
SUSTAINABILITY IN BARCELONA'S PUBLIC PARKS." Cal Poly Pomona University Library
Catalog. Jan. 2009. Web. 30 May 2011. http://0-
14
web.hwwilsonweb.com.opac.library.csupomona.edu/hww/results/external_link_maincontentframe.jh
tml?_DARGS=/hww/results/results_common.jhtml.44.
9) West, Dawn. "When Is It the Best Time to Water Your Lawn?" Allaboutlawns.com. 21 Aug. 2006.
Web. 1 June 2011. http://www.allaboutlawns.com/lawn-maintenance-care/watering/when-is-the-
best-time-to-water.php.
10) Photographs taken by Christopher Edmunson unless otherwise noted