sustainable agriculture a natural part of the structural adjustment process ?
Post on 19-Dec-2015
219 views
TRANSCRIPT
Sustainable AgricultureSustainable Agriculture
A natural part of the structural A natural part of the structural adjustment process ?adjustment process ?
Sustainable Agriculture:Sustainable Agriculture:balance three main goalsbalance three main goals
Environmental healthEnvironmental health Economic profitabilityEconomic profitability Socio-economic equitySocio-economic equity
Commodity agricultureCommodity agriculture
Agriculture is incorporated into an Agriculture is incorporated into an global and corporate-controlled food global and corporate-controlled food systemsystem
Driven by twin goals of productivity Driven by twin goals of productivity and efficiencyand efficiency
Maximizing profitability by balancing Maximizing profitability by balancing 1) land 2) labor 3) capital and 4) 1) land 2) labor 3) capital and 4) managementmanagement
Why the changeWhy the change
Industrial Agriculture now creates Industrial Agriculture now creates multiple problemsmultiple problems
- threat to the environment- threat to the environment
- threat to natural resources- threat to natural resources
- threat to the quality of life for - threat to the quality of life for
farmers and rural communities farmers and rural communities - and the society as a hole - and the society as a hole
Approaches to changeApproaches to change
Government can regulate and set Government can regulate and set standards – code of best practicestandards – code of best practice
Let the invisible hand of the market Let the invisible hand of the market do the jobdo the job
Post industrial approaches – people Post industrial approaches – people driven solutionsdriven solutions
The Dutch Manure Quota SystemThe Dutch Manure Quota System
Regulation and markets to achieve Regulation and markets to achieve
environmental outcomesenvironmental outcomes
andand
Sustain rural communitiesSustain rural communities
The Dutch System of Manure QuotaThe Dutch System of Manure Quota
Over-application of manure effluent can result in runoff and ponding of water on the soil surface. Both activities can lead to surface and ground water contamination.
Bacteria and nitrate are the two most dangerous pollutants in drinking water
Impact on human health especially infantsAlso reduced vitality and increase stillbirth, low birth weight and slow weight gain in livestock
Holland: The Environmental Holland: The Environmental Problem in Animal Agriculture:Problem in Animal Agriculture:
Between the early 1960s and the mid Between the early 1960s and the mid 1980s:1980s:
Pigs increased by 10 million (450%)Pigs increased by 10 million (450%) Poultry increased by 50 million (125%)Poultry increased by 50 million (125%) Consequently, a manure surplus developed Consequently, a manure surplus developed
of + 19%of + 19% The EU standard of 50mg of nitrate pr liter of The EU standard of 50mg of nitrate pr liter of
groundwater was exceeded on 60% of groundwater was exceeded on 60% of agricultural landagricultural land
First warning sounded in the 1970sFirst warning sounded in the 1970s
11stst Policy Action: A Moratorium Policy Action: A Moratorium the Interim Law for Restriction of Pig the Interim Law for Restriction of Pig
and Poultry Farms (November 1984).and Poultry Farms (November 1984). No new farms in the worst affected No new farms in the worst affected
areasareas Restrictions on expansions on existing Restrictions on expansions on existing
farms (10%)farms (10%)It was not enough: It was not enough: the number of pigs went up with 7.5% the number of pigs went up with 7.5%
per year from 1983 to 1987per year from 1983 to 1987 Eutrophication of surface and ground Eutrophication of surface and ground
water became of international concern water became of international concern (cut nutrients into North Sea by 50%)(cut nutrients into North Sea by 50%)
The 3 Phase PlanThe 3 Phase PlanPhase I: 1987 – 1990Phase I: 1987 – 1990 The Manure Law (Phosphate control)The Manure Law (Phosphate control)
• Manure quota and book-keeping system Manure quota and book-keeping system The Soil Protection ActThe Soil Protection Act
• Application rates and timing of land Application rates and timing of land applicationapplication
Phase II: 1991 – 1994Phase II: 1991 – 1994 The Environmental Management ActThe Environmental Management Act
• Guidelines on ammonia and cattle farming Guidelines on ammonia and cattle farming under the Nuisance Actunder the Nuisance Act
Phase III: 1995 – 2000Phase III: 1995 – 2000 Markets for manure quotas establishedMarkets for manure quotas established
Overview of the Quota SystemOverview of the Quota System Manure production rights limited to 125 kg of Manure production rights limited to 125 kg of
phosphate per hectarephosphate per hectare Farmer grandfathered a ‘reference amount’Farmer grandfathered a ‘reference amount’ Based on inventory of animals and standards Based on inventory of animals and standards
for manure production for 3 animal categoriesfor manure production for 3 animal categories1.1. Cattle and turkeyCattle and turkey2.2. Goat, sheep, fox, nutria and ducksGoat, sheep, fox, nutria and ducks3.3. Swine and poultry Swine and poultry
Difference between phosphate intake through Difference between phosphate intake through feed and output through meat, egg etcfeed and output through meat, egg etc
Established phosphate deficit and surplus Established phosphate deficit and surplus farmsfarms
Deficit farmers could continue to expandDeficit farmers could continue to expand Surplus farmers needed additional registered Surplus farmers needed additional registered
manure production rights for expansionmanure production rights for expansion
Trading in Manure Production RightsTrading in Manure Production Rights
1987 – 93 :1987 – 93 : transfer of manure production rights transfer of manure production rights
restricted to land transfers:restricted to land transfers:• Part of transfers of whole farmPart of transfers of whole farm• With marriage and heritageWith marriage and heritage• With annulment of lease contractWith annulment of lease contract
Expansion only by buying landExpansion only by buying land However, If buying additional land the However, If buying additional land the
associated ‘reference amount’ would first associated ‘reference amount’ would first fill the gap on existing land.fill the gap on existing land.• Expansion of animal production therefore Expansion of animal production therefore
limited to new farms on cropping landlimited to new farms on cropping land
1994–97: Relaxed trading1994–97: Relaxed trading These restrictions limited investmentThese restrictions limited investment Manure production right renamed Manure production right renamed
manure quotas 1) land based and 2) manure quotas 1) land based and 2) non-land based quotasnon-land based quotas
1) 125 kg of phosphate per ha of land1) 125 kg of phosphate per ha of land
2) diff. between land based quota and 2) diff. between land based quota and the animal based reference amountthe animal based reference amount
Both 1 and 2 made animal specificBoth 1 and 2 made animal specific Only non-land based quotas were Only non-land based quotas were
tradabletradable
1994–97: Relaxed trading1994–97: Relaxed trading
Reference amount adjusted for Reference amount adjusted for improvement in feed qualityimprovement in feed quality
The difference between reference The difference between reference amount and adjusted reference amount and adjusted reference amount made non-tradableamount made non-tradable
Quota cut by 25% when tradedQuota cut by 25% when traded Could only trade from animal Could only trade from animal
category 3) to 2) to 1), not in reverse category 3) to 2) to 1), not in reverse order – restrict expansion in swine order – restrict expansion in swine productionproduction
1995: Nutrient Accounting System proposed1995: Nutrient Accounting System proposed
In 1995 quotas for pork and poultry cut by 30% In 1995 quotas for pork and poultry cut by 30% in response to the development of low-nutrient in response to the development of low-nutrient feed,feed,
1997 further problems with swine fewer, policy 1997 further problems with swine fewer, policy move to reduce swine quotas by further 25% by move to reduce swine quotas by further 25% by 2000 - farmer protest2000 - farmer protest
1 Jan 1998 NAS and building regulation 1 Jan 1998 NAS and building regulation introduced and the 30% abandonedintroduced and the 30% abandoned
1 Sept 1998 pork quotas reduced to reflect 90% 1 Sept 1998 pork quotas reduced to reflect 90% of herd as part of the aim to reduce herd by of herd as part of the aim to reduce herd by 25% by 200025% by 2000
Quota buy-out program for the swine sector Quota buy-out program for the swine sector
1998 Nutrient Accounting System1998 Nutrient Accounting System Farmers challenged 10% reduction in court. In Farmers challenged 10% reduction in court. In
2000 the Court upheld decision but exempted 2000 the Court upheld decision but exempted the planned 15% reduction in 2000 the planned 15% reduction in 2000
Nutrient accounting for phosphor and nitrateNutrient accounting for phosphor and nitrate Nutrient surplus subject to a high tax to Nutrient surplus subject to a high tax to
encourage farmers in surplus regions to truck encourage farmers in surplus regions to truck manure and spread it on grain farms in deficit manure and spread it on grain farms in deficit regionregion
Building requirements for new buildings to Building requirements for new buildings to reduce ammonia emissionsreduce ammonia emissions
Condition for purchase of extra quota: Condition for purchase of extra quota: improvement for buildings to reduce ammonia improvement for buildings to reduce ammonia emissionemission
Regional Differences Regional Differences and Geographical and Geographical
Restrictions on TradingRestrictions on Trading
Surplus: manure production Surplus: manure production in excess of 125 kg of in excess of 125 kg of PP22OO55/ha/ha
Deficit: less than 125 kgDeficit: less than 125 kg Surplus region: small Surplus region: small
intensive farmsintensive farms Deficit region: larger farms Deficit region: larger farms
with little experience in with little experience in confined livestock confined livestock productionproduction
Trade allowed within regionsTrade allowed within regions And from surplus to deficitAnd from surplus to deficit In surplus regions expansion In surplus regions expansion
also required purchase of also required purchase of ammonium rights – these ammonium rights – these only tradable within countiesonly tradable within counties
Reduce willingness to Reduce willingness to expand in surplus regionsexpand in surplus regions
Evaluation:Evaluation:
Price of quota: Great variation Price of quota: Great variation between regions, animal categories between regions, animal categories and over timeand over time
Volume of tradeVolume of trade very low 1.5% of total quota the first very low 1.5% of total quota the first
yearyear By 1997 accumulated to 8.1% and By 1997 accumulated to 8.1% and
9.5% for surplus and deficit regions 9.5% for surplus and deficit regions respectivelyrespectively
Evaluation:Evaluation: Reasons for low trade:Reasons for low trade:
• Administrative procedures; buyers had to Administrative procedures; buyers had to demonstrate adequate manure disposal plan. demonstrate adequate manure disposal plan. During first year 37% of plans rejected. Therefore During first year 37% of plans rejected. Therefore high transaction costs (as much as 17% of price)high transaction costs (as much as 17% of price)
• Policy uncertaintyPolicy uncertainty• Initially many had excess quotas (10-25%, gave Initially many had excess quotas (10-25%, gave
high numbers for reference amount calculations). high numbers for reference amount calculations). Impact on demand and priceImpact on demand and price
• Restrictions between regions and categories Restrictions between regions and categories impeded tradeimpeded trade
• The 25% retirement rule increased the willingness The 25% retirement rule increased the willingness to acceptto accept
EvaluationEvaluation Geographic pattern of tradeGeographic pattern of trade
• Encouraged farmers in surplus region to sell land and Encouraged farmers in surplus region to sell land and quota and set up in deficit regionquota and set up in deficit region
Encouraged exit adjustmentEncouraged exit adjustment Environmental effectivenessEnvironmental effectiveness
• Animal numbers and nutrients emission have been Animal numbers and nutrients emission have been reduced – but why and by how much?reduced – but why and by how much?
• Especially pork farmers have not been convinced of Especially pork farmers have not been convinced of the environmental benefitsthe environmental benefits
Dynamic Effects and InnovationDynamic Effects and Innovation• Incentive to development of methods to reduce Incentive to development of methods to reduce
emission. Especially nutritional development in the emission. Especially nutritional development in the pork industrypork industry
Post-industrial approachesPost-industrial approachesLess input intensive farming methodsLess input intensive farming methodsFocus on value and quality Focus on value and quality Civic agricultureCivic agriculture Organic farmingOrganic farming Alternative agricultureAlternative agriculture Biodynamic farmingBiodynamic farming Ecologically grownEcologically grown Local food systemsLocal food systems Community supported agricultureCommunity supported agriculture
The Environmentally friendly producer The Environmentally friendly producer and consumer - Eco-labelingand consumer - Eco-labeling
Shade grown coffeeShade grown coffee Plantation timberPlantation timber
Fair Trade not Free TradeFair Trade not Free Trade
Higher Soil Organic MatterHigher Soil Organic Matter• Nutrients for crop growthNutrients for crop growth• Soil aggregation and porositySoil aggregation and porosity• Stabilizes soil against erosionStabilizes soil against erosion
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Conventional Rotation No-Till
Farm Type
% S
oil
Org
anic
Mat
ter
Soil Resources
Slide from Southwestern Minnesota from www.stolaf.edu
Lower Soil CompactionLower Soil Compaction
Enhances water infiltrationEnhances water infiltration Prevents rapid runoff and soil erosionPrevents rapid runoff and soil erosion
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Conventional Rotation No-Till
Farm Type
So
il C
om
pac
tio
n a
t 6
in.
(psi
)
Soil Resources
Slide from Southwestern Minnesota from www.stolaf.edu
Higher Soil MoistureHigher Soil Moisture
(samples taken during grain-filling period – (samples taken during grain-filling period – Aug./Sept.)Aug./Sept.)
0
5
10
15
20
25
Conventional Rotation No-Till
Farm Type
% S
oil
Mo
istu
re
Soil Resources
Slide from Southwestern Minnesota from www.stolaf.edu
Higher Soil Invertebrate PopulationsHigher Soil Invertebrate Populations• Contribute to Nutrient RecyclingContribute to Nutrient Recycling• Maintain porous soil (burrowing)Maintain porous soil (burrowing)• Control crop pestsControl crop pests
0.000
5.000
10.000
15.000
20.000
Conventional Rotation No-Till
Farm Type
# I
nv
ert
s /
.0
12
5 m
3
Soil Resources
Slide from Southwestern Minnesota from www.stolaf.edu
Lower Runoff VolumeLower Runoff Volume Porous soil structuresPorous soil structures Cover crops (crop rotation) Cover crops (crop rotation) Crop residue (no till)Crop residue (no till) }
0
200
400
600800
1000
1200
1400
Conventional Rotation No-Till
Farm Type
mL
Ru
no
ff /
cm
Ra
inincrease infiltration
Water Resources
Slide from Southwestern Minnesota from www.stolaf.edu
Lower N Loss in RunoffLower N Loss in Runoff Crop Rotation – deep roots of Crop Rotation – deep roots of
perennials take up nutrientsperennials take up nutrients No Till – low erosion prevents No Till – low erosion prevents
nutrient lossnutrient loss
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Conventional Rotation No-Till
Farm Type
N F
lux
(m
g N
/ c
m r
ain
)
Water Resources
Lower Fossil Fuel UseLower Fossil Fuel Use
Decreased fertilizer and pesticide useDecreased fertilizer and pesticide use Decreased machinery and fuel useDecreased machinery and fuel use
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
CONV. (C
)
CONV. (C
-C-S
)
ROTATI
ON
NO-TIL
L
Farm Type
En
erg
y U
se (
kcal
/acr
e/yr
)
Fuel
Pesticides
Fertilizer
Energy Use
Higher Corn and Soybean YieldsHigher Corn and Soybean Yields
Higher soil fertilityHigher soil fertility Higher soil moistureHigher soil moisture
020406080
100120140160
CONV (C-S)
ROTATION (C-S-O/A-A-A)
NO-TILL (C-S)
Farm Type
Yie
ld (
bu
sh
els
/ a
cre
)
Corn(bushels/acre)
Soybeans(bushels/acre)
Economic Productivity
Environmentally friendly productionEnvironmentally friendly production
Plantations - the alternative to native Plantations - the alternative to native forest logging – sustainable production forest logging – sustainable production ‘seal of approval’‘seal of approval’
Forest clearing project sponsored by the Indonesian government.
Fair trade – not free tradeFair trade – not free trade FairTrade Mark –Banana from Haiti FairTrade Mark –Banana from Haiti
an independent guarantee that disadvantaged producers in the developing world are getting a better deal
Civic AgricultureCivic AgricultureSmaller scale, locally oriented enterprisesSmaller scale, locally oriented enterprisesDirect marketing offers farmers the advantage of:Direct marketing offers farmers the advantage of:High value products: organic grown, specialtiesHigh value products: organic grown, specialties grass fedgrass fed free rangefree rangeCut out of middle-level handlersCut out of middle-level handlers pick-your-own, farm standspick-your-own, farm stands growers marked, e-mail orders, growers marked, e-mail orders,
consumer participation in productionconsumer participation in productionCraft-style productsCraft-style productsBetter land management practicesBetter land management practicesHealthier soils and animalsHealthier soils and animalsA community connection about food production A community connection about food production
Trends in: Direct sales Trends in: Direct sales
1992 - 86.000 farmers in US 1992 - 86.000 farmers in US mainland reported direct salesmainland reported direct sales
1997 – 97.000 farmers in US 1997 – 97.000 farmers in US mainland reported direct salesmainland reported direct sales
5% of all farms with sales totaling US 5% of all farms with sales totaling US $ 500 million, but less than 1% of all $ 500 million, but less than 1% of all agricultural salesagricultural sales
Demographic characteristicsDemographic characteristics
Farmers in areas in and around Farmers in areas in and around metropolitan areas can benefitmetropolitan areas can benefit
Farmers in areas with a population of Farmers in areas with a population of affluent, well-educated urban affluent, well-educated urban consumers consumers
13% of all farms in Northeast13% of all farms in Northeast
3.1% of all farms in the South3.1% of all farms in the South
4% of all farms in the Midwest4% of all farms in the Midwest
Historical contextHistorical context
Policy legacy resulted in over Policy legacy resulted in over allocation of water and development allocation of water and development of unsustainable landof unsustainable land
Mechanisms needed to Mechanisms needed to • facilitate and encourage a reallocation facilitate and encourage a reallocation
of resources to more efficient and higher of resources to more efficient and higher valued producers in more sustainable valued producers in more sustainable locationslocations
• provide water for ecosystemsprovide water for ecosystems
Council of Australian GovernmentsCouncil of Australian Governments
Following international trends in 1994 Following international trends in 1994 CoAG introduced a reform package:CoAG introduced a reform package:
PricingPricing Water entitlementsWater entitlements Water TradingWater Trading Formally recognizing the environmentFormally recognizing the environment Institutional reformsInstitutional reforms Consultation and public educationConsultation and public educationPart of an IGA on a National Competition Part of an IGA on a National Competition Policy and related reformsPolicy and related reforms
Council of Australian GovernmentsCouncil of Australian Governments
2003 review identified three shortcomings 2003 review identified three shortcomings
uncertainty over the long-term access to uncertainty over the long-term access to water was still hampering investment;water was still hampering investment;
Current water market arrangements are Current water market arrangements are preventing markets from reaching their preventing markets from reaching their full potential; full potential;
concern over the pace of securing concern over the pace of securing adequate environmental flows and adequate environmental flows and adaptive management systems.adaptive management systems.
2004 National Water Initiative2004 National Water Initiative
Clear, secure and nationally-compatible Clear, secure and nationally-compatible characteristics for water access characteristics for water access entitlements defined as a perpetual entitlements defined as a perpetual share of the consumptive pool share of the consumptive pool
a transparent, statutory-based water a transparent, statutory-based water planning process defining the planning process defining the consumptive pool and the process of consumptive pool and the process of allocating water allocating water
statutory provisions for environmental statutory provisions for environmental and other public benefit outcomesand other public benefit outcomes
2004 National Water Initiative2004 National Water Initiative
returning currently over allocated or returning currently over allocated or overused systems to environmentally overused systems to environmentally sustainable levels of extractionsustainable levels of extraction
progressive removal of barriers to trade in progressive removal of barriers to trade in waterwater
assignment of risk arising from future assignment of risk arising from future change in the availability of water for change in the availability of water for consumptionconsumption
address future adjustment issues that may address future adjustment issues that may impact on water users and communities impact on water users and communities
The Murray Darling Basin The Murray Darling Basin
1996 Cap on water use at 93/94 level1996 Cap on water use at 93/94 level 2002 Living Murray process2002 Living Murray process 2004 IGA on addressing overallocation 2004 IGA on addressing overallocation
as the first step to provide 500 GL for as the first step to provide 500 GL for six sitessix sites
Water Sharing Plans – NWI no guidelines Water Sharing Plans – NWI no guidelines as to how to share the cost of thisas to how to share the cost of this
State legislation and policyState legislation and policy
South Australia 1997, NSW 2000, South Australia 1997, NSW 2000, Queensland 2000 – New Water Acts:Queensland 2000 – New Water Acts:• Separation of land and waterSeparation of land and water• Separation of ownership and use of waterSeparation of ownership and use of water• Planning processesPlanning processes• Water marketsWater markets• Environmental issues Environmental issues
But absolutely inconsistent across But absolutely inconsistent across statesstates
State legislation and policyState legislation and policy
2004 - Victoria White Paper:2004 - Victoria White Paper: Introduce the separation of land and water Introduce the separation of land and water
– max 10% of total entitlements of source– max 10% of total entitlements of source Share based entitlementShare based entitlement Non-tradable site use licenses linked to Non-tradable site use licenses linked to
landland Some channels need to be closed – Some channels need to be closed –
compensation for loss of land valuecompensation for loss of land value New tradable low security license against New tradable low security license against
20% reduction in pool for the environment20% reduction in pool for the environment
State legislation and policyState legislation and policy
Victorian White Paper continued:Victorian White Paper continued: Channel capacity entitlementChannel capacity entitlement Separate capacity charge – better Separate capacity charge – better
economic signalseconomic signals Government committed to provide the Government committed to provide the
initial water for environmental flowinitial water for environmental flow Promise to consider supporting Promise to consider supporting
communities suffering from export of communities suffering from export of water out of districtswater out of districts
State legislation and policyState legislation and policy
Generally changed allocation Generally changed allocation practicepractice
Transferred most risk management Transferred most risk management from water authorities to irrigatorsfrom water authorities to irrigators
Water markets looked upon as one of Water markets looked upon as one of the main instruments to alleviate the main instruments to alleviate impact of new policy paradigm by impact of new policy paradigm by both Federal, State and Basin both Federal, State and Basin
Have markets achieved objectivesHave markets achieved objectives
Water moved to more efficient usersWater moved to more efficient users Water moved to higher valued usersWater moved to higher valued users Water consolidate into larger unitsWater consolidate into larger units
ConclusionsConclusions
Change in policy paradigm in Change in policy paradigm in Australia aggressive due to the Australia aggressive due to the extend of the impact of past policiesextend of the impact of past policies
Transferred most risk management Transferred most risk management to irrigatorsto irrigators
Reductions in entitlement inevitable Reductions in entitlement inevitable in most catchmentsin most catchments
Water markets relied upon to Water markets relied upon to manage this processmanage this process
A sustainable Water Management A sustainable Water Management FrameworkFramework
Farm Business
Access Entitlement
Use Right
Farm Water Management Plan
Water Allocation
Planning Hierarchy
Local plan Capacity Entitlement
Catchment Plan
State Plan
National Strategy
Water trading and leasing
Access Entitlement trading and leasing
Capacity trading and leasing