“sustainable energy for all- 5cs

3
Source: IISD Features Global Forum Policy Brief The Magazine Extra! All Posts Subscribe “Sustainable Energy for All is maybe the only thing that can save the younger generation.” By Making It on 17 June, 2013 Albert Binger, Energy Science Advisor at the Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre explains how small island developing states (SIDS), which are especially endangered by climate change, create funding sources for their adaptation. Binger, who is a member of the UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Group on Sustainable Energy for All, also outlines the promising renewable energy sources for the SIDS. The interview by Mira Kapfinger took place during the Vienna Energy Forum (VEF), co-organized by the UN Industrial Development Organization in Austria in May 2013. *** You participated in the first Vienna Energy Forum (VEF) back 2009. Looking back at that event, what did it contribute to your work within the Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre? When we came to the first VEF in 2009, we came to test ideas. Could people be convinced that for certain countries the best way to support adaptation (to climate change) was through mitigation? In the classic UN system way, they separated adaptation from mitigation. Adaptation was for developing countries and mitigation was for OECD countries. We island states have never really fitted into either of those classifications. Maybe because we are so small, people don’t take us seriously. They think we are too small to lead. So, we wanted to see what was going to be the reaction to our ideas. We wanted to see where there were potential partners. For us, it was very successful because we did get positive response from a number of countries. We took some of those ideas and we worked on them. By the time we arrived at the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference in December 2009 (COP15), we were hopeful that this meeting would be transformational. We hoped that the work done by various colleagues in the preparatory meetings for COP15 would lead to a different outcome than the COPs before, but it didn’t. There were just too many vested interests: vested interest from the coal-producing and coal-using countries, vested interests from the petroleum- producing countries and vested interests from countries who felt that they would be losing competitive advantage. So, nobody wanted to lead and nothing happened. That gave us then a chance to put some of the ideas that we had discussed at the first VEF together to start the SIDS DOCK (an initiative among member countries of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) to provide the SIDS with a collective institutional mechanism to assist them transform their national energy sectors into a catalyst for sustainable economic development and help generate financial resources to address adaptation to climate change). The Third VEF, taking place now, is about developing more partnerships, looking at things like how the Sustainable Energy for All Initiative (SE4All) can help us and what we can contribute to it. Even though we are trying to really and truly help ourselves, that will not take us far if the emissions continue. Even if we totally transformed our energy sector and go 100% renewable, even if we do displace what we estimate to be about 190 to 200 million barrels of oil out of our system, we couldn’t fund our adaptation. We would save a lot of money, maybe US$20-25bn a year, which would be much more than we could ever hope to negotiate for. But it wouldn’t be sufficient for those of us who can adapt. Some of us will not be able to adapt at all. One reason for that is geography, the other is geology. For example, Tuvalu is simply too low-lying and the island’s geology is honeycomb limestone. This means the island will actually float from the inside out, rather than from the outside over. There are quite a few islands like that. Also, the Maldives will disappear, because it is only three metres above sea level at its highest points, and 80% of the land area lies than one metre above sea level. “We sometimes lose sight of the fact that the numbers we are talking about are only averages. We know that we are going to be on the high sides of the averages and we know that we are going to lose our countries.” With the 400ppm (annual average of parts per million of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere) that we are currently facing, the overall temperature increase is, of course, an average. We sometimes lose sight of the fact that the numbers we are talking about are only averages. We know that we are going to be on the high sides of the averages and we know that we are going to lose some of our countries. And for the rest of us, our countries will become smaller because the coastal areas will go underwater. We will lose a lot of our infrastructure! But we have a fighting chance. The SE4All initiative is the only hope, even though it is a UN initiative and these days I don’t have many expectations about the UN organizations. But even if we are able to change our energy systems, we still have to get the greenhouse gas emissions stabilized. In fact, we want to see the decarbonization of the atmosphere. And we think SE4All, as it is now, is maybe – as bad as it sounds – the only real thing that might save the younger generation. Which is not a promising outlook but it is the only one. We want to see how best we can support it to make it successful so that it can develop momentum to transform the energy sector. But, of course, all of that is very political, more that it is scientific. This is the reason why I always go after the politicians. You talked about mitigation and adaptation, and concerning the financing of those measures, during today’s panel discussion you and Christoph Frei from the World Energy Council, agreed that a good idea is not sufficient to get financing. So, the SIDS started the SIDS DOCK initiative in order to be able to enter the carbon markets. How satisfied are you with your results so far? We have now been in operation for about 18 months. Our first aim was to begin to develop our project pipeline. Now we have passed half a billion, on the way to two billion dollars in projects. Our estimation is that we would need 10 to 20 billion dollars, depending on the technology choices that we make. We are trying to figure out the best combination. We developed a so-called National Financing Mechanism, which all 31 member countries will hopefully sign onto shortly. This will allow us to go into the global markets, socially correct investment and so on. We can tap this money and then move it to the national levels where it can be used to create revolving funds, to fund development projects, to do capacity building and so forth. The avoided oil imports will repay that fund. Once we finish the pay-back, we can keep the money to do adaptation and poverty alleviation and so on. As far as carbon trading is concerned, we are beginning to put in place the mechanism to calculate the carbon saving from the projects and the kinds of formal procedures

Upload: karla-l-austin

Post on 28-Dec-2015

13 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

sustainable energy

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: “Sustainable Energy for All- 5Cs

Source:IISD

FeaturesGlobalForumPolicyBriefTheMagazineExtra!AllPosts

Subscribe

“Sustainable Energy for All is maybe the only thing that can save the younger generation.”ByMakingIton17June,2013

AlbertBinger,EnergyScienceAdvisorattheCaribbeanCommunityClimateChangeCentreexplainshowsmallislanddevelopingstates(SIDS),whichareespeciallyendangeredbyclimatechange,createfundingsourcesfortheiradaptation.Binger,whoisamemberoftheUNSecretary-General’sHigh-LevelGrouponSustainableEnergyforAll,alsooutlinesthepromisingrenewableenergysourcesfortheSIDS.TheinterviewbyMiraKapfingertookplaceduringtheViennaEnergyForum(VEF),co-organizedbytheUNIndustrialDevelopmentOrganizationinAustriainMay2013.

***

YouparticipatedinthefirstViennaEnergyForum(VEF)back2009.Lookingbackatthatevent,whatdiditcontributetoyourworkwithintheCaribbeanCommunityClimateChangeCentre?

WhenwecametothefirstVEFin2009,wecametotestideas.Couldpeoplebeconvincedthatforcertaincountriesthebestwaytosupportadaptation(toclimatechange)wasthroughmitigation?IntheclassicUNsystemway,theyseparatedadaptationfrommitigation.AdaptationwasfordevelopingcountriesandmitigationwasforOECDcountries.Weislandstateshaveneverreallyfittedintoeitherofthoseclassifications.Maybebecausewearesosmall,peopledon’ttakeusseriously.Theythinkwearetoosmalltolead.So,wewantedtoseewhatwasgoingtobethereactiontoourideas.Wewantedtoseewheretherewerepotentialpartners.Forus,itwasverysuccessfulbecausewedidgetpositiveresponsefromanumberofcountries.Wetooksomeofthoseideasandweworkedonthem.

BythetimewearrivedattheCopenhagenClimateChangeConferenceinDecember2009(COP15),wewerehopefulthatthismeetingwouldbetransformational.WehopedthattheworkdonebyvariouscolleaguesinthepreparatorymeetingsforCOP15wouldleadtoadifferentoutcomethantheCOPsbefore,butitdidn’t.

Therewerejusttoomanyvestedinterests:vestedinterestfromthecoal-producingandcoal-usingcountries,vestedinterestsfromthepetroleum-producingcountriesandvestedinterestsfromcountrieswhofeltthattheywouldbelosingcompetitiveadvantage.So,nobodywantedtoleadandnothinghappened.ThatgaveusthenachancetoputsomeoftheideasthatwehaddiscussedatthefirstVEFtogethertostarttheSIDSDOCK(aninitiativeamongmembercountriesoftheAllianceofSmallIslandStates(AOSIS)toprovidetheSIDSwithacollectiveinstitutionalmechanismtoassistthemtransformtheirnationalenergysectorsintoacatalystforsustainableeconomicdevelopmentandhelpgeneratefinancialresourcestoaddressadaptationtoclimatechange).

TheThirdVEF,takingplacenow,isaboutdevelopingmorepartnerships,lookingatthingslikehowtheSustainableEnergyforAllInitiative(SE4All)canhelpusandwhatwecancontributetoit.Eventhoughwearetryingtoreallyandtrulyhelpourselves,thatwillnottakeusfariftheemissionscontinue.Evenifwetotallytransformedourenergysectorandgo100%renewable,evenifwedodisplacewhatweestimatetobeabout190to200millionbarrelsofoiloutofoursystem,wecouldn’tfundouradaptation.Wewouldsavealotofmoney,maybeUS$20-25bnayear,whichwouldbemuchmorethanwecouldeverhopetonegotiatefor.Butitwouldn’tbesufficientforthoseofuswhocanadapt.Someofuswillnotbeabletoadaptatall.Onereasonforthatisgeography,theotherisgeology.Forexample,Tuvaluissimplytoolow-lyingandtheisland’sgeologyishoneycomblimestone.Thismeanstheislandwillactuallyfloatfromtheinsideout,ratherthanfromtheoutsideover.Therearequiteafewislandslikethat.Also,theMaldiveswilldisappear,becauseitisonlythreemetresabovesealevelatitshighestpoints,and80%ofthelandarealiesthanonemetreabovesealevel.

“We sometimes lose sight of the fact that the numbers we are talking about are only averages. We knowthat we are going to be on the high sides of the averages and we know that we are going to lose ourcountries.”

Withthe400ppm(annualaverageofpartspermillionofcarbondioxideintheatmosphere)thatwearecurrentlyfacing,theoveralltemperatureincreaseis,ofcourse,anaverage.Wesometimeslosesightofthefactthatthenumberswearetalkingaboutareonlyaverages.Weknowthatwearegoingtobeonthehighsidesoftheaveragesandweknowthatwearegoingtolosesomeofourcountries.Andfortherestofus,ourcountrieswillbecomesmallerbecausethecoastalareaswillgounderwater.Wewilllosealotofourinfrastructure!Butwehaveafightingchance.TheSE4Allinitiativeistheonlyhope,eventhoughitisaUNinitiativeandthesedaysIdon’thavemanyexpectationsabouttheUNorganizations.Butevenifweareabletochangeourenergysystems,westillhavetogetthegreenhousegasemissionsstabilized.Infact,wewanttoseethedecarbonizationoftheatmosphere.AndwethinkSE4All,asitisnow,ismaybe–asbadasitsounds–theonlyrealthingthatmightsavetheyoungergeneration.Whichisnotapromisingoutlookbutitistheonlyone.Wewanttoseehowbestwecansupportittomakeitsuccessfulsothatitcandevelopmomentumtotransformtheenergysector.But,ofcourse,allofthatisverypolitical,morethatitisscientific.ThisisthereasonwhyIalwaysgoafterthepoliticians.

Youtalkedaboutmitigationandadaptation,andconcerningthefinancingofthosemeasures,duringtoday’spaneldiscussionyouandChristophFreifromtheWorldEnergyCouncil,agreedthatagoodideaisnotsufficienttogetfinancing.So,theSIDSstartedtheSIDSDOCKinitiativeinordertobeabletoenterthecarbonmarkets.Howsatisfiedareyouwithyourresultssofar?

Wehavenowbeeninoperationforabout18months.Ourfirstaimwastobegintodevelopourprojectpipeline.Nowwehavepassedhalfabillion,onthewaytotwobilliondollarsinprojects.Ourestimationisthatwewouldneed10to20billiondollars,dependingonthetechnologychoicesthatwemake.Wearetryingtofigureoutthebestcombination.Wedevelopedaso-calledNationalFinancingMechanism,whichall31membercountrieswillhopefullysignontoshortly.Thiswillallowustogointotheglobalmarkets,sociallycorrectinvestmentandsoon.Wecantapthismoneyandthenmoveittothenationallevelswhereitcanbeusedtocreaterevolvingfunds,tofunddevelopmentprojects,todocapacitybuildingandsoforth.Theavoidedoilimportswillrepaythatfund.Oncewefinishthepay-back,wecankeepthemoneytodoadaptationandpovertyalleviationandsoon.

Asfarascarbontradingisconcerned,wearebeginningtoputinplacethemechanismtocalculatethecarbonsavingfromtheprojectsandthekindsofformalprocedures

Page 2: “Sustainable Energy for All- 5Cs

tocertifytheemissions.Further,wehavehadinitialdiscussionswithNorwayaboutanagreementthatwouldallowustosellacoupleofmilliontonnesayeartothem.Thiswouldgenerateincomeforusaspartoftheirclimateinitiatives.Ofcourse,therearesomeissuesthatwehavetoresolvewithintheframeworkconventionsuchashowtodealwiththeseallocatedunitsofpollution,etc.,butweareprettyconfidentthatifwecannotgetitwithintheUNFCCC(UnitedNationsFrameworkConventiononClimateChange)framework,wecanactuallygetitwithinvoluntarycarbonmarketsorpurchases.CompanieslikeNikeandothersactuallydopurchasecarbonandtheypurchaseitatbetterprices.So,wethinkthatmaybewecouldmakeanicecasetothemassmallislandpeopleswhoareontheedgeofsurvival.

Youmentioneddifferenttechnologiesthatareavailable.Itisprobablyverydifficulttogiveageneralizedviewofallthediverseislandnations,butstillI’dliketoaskyoutosumupthemostpromisingtechnologiesinyourviewandsaywhicharemostlikelytogeneraterevenuessoon.

WetakethepositionthatintheSIDSwehavethelargestarrayofrenewableenergysources.Geothermal,solarthermal,oceanthermal,hydro,wind,solar–wehaveit.Havingtheresourcesisnotanissueforus.Inthiscase,wearemoreabundantinrichesthananything,butwealsohavehighlyinefficientenergyuse.Therefore,ourfirsthigh-leveltargettechnologiesareenergy-efficienttechnologies,lightingandcooling,inparticular.Thatiswhereweusealotofourelectricity.Inlighting,wearelookingatLEDsasaverypromisingtechnology,andinsomeotherwaysmaybealsocompactfluorescencehasaroletoplay.Wearevery,veryexcitedaboutsolarthermalcooling.HereinAustria,youhaveacompanycalledSOLID.Inmycountry,Jamaica,ithasbuilttheonlysolarthermalcoolingbuildingontheentireisland.Wethinkthatthistechnologychangesalotofthingsforus,becauseitisatmax,whenthedemandisatmax.Thenwedon’thavetoworryaboutallthatpeakelectricity,whichusuallygivesusalotoftrouble.Ifwecanfindtechnologiesthattakeoffthepeak,thenwecanbase-loadaloteasier.So,thosesolarthermaltechnologiesforheatingandcoolingarepriorityforus.Steppingdownthescaletoourbase-load,wearelookingatgeothermal.Wehaveabout8or10countriesthathavegeothermalresources.

“If we can figure out how to live with the oceans and to manage the resources that we have, then wehave a good chance. Not only does it position us to meet our energy needs in a sustainable way but itallows us to set up new industries.”

Butthethingthatismostexcitingtousistheoceanthermaltechnology(OTEC).Becauseallofushavehotoceans!Anditisveryfunnythathowwedealwiththeoceansisgoingtodeterminethewaywesurvive.Ifwecanfigureouthowtolivewiththeoceansandtomanagetheresourcesthatwehave,thenwehaveagoodchance.Notonlydoesitpositionustomeetourenergyneedsinasustainableway–aslongasthereisawarmocean,wewillbefineandIthinkthewarmoceanwillbethereaslongasthesunisthere–butitallowsustosetupnewindustries.Whichiswhatwereallyneedbecauseofoursmallsize,nobodywantstocomeandinvestinlittleislandswith20,000inhabitants.Thereisnomarket,hightransportcost,highcommunicationcost–toomuchrisk.Thetransactioncostdoesn’tmakeusattractive.ButwebelievethatwithOTECwecancreateourownnewsustainableeconomy,whichcontributestoourislands.Aswesay,“Islandenergyforislandlife.”

AlbertBinger(secondfromtheleft)takingpartinthepaneldiscussiononsustainableenergyaccessattheThirdViennaEnergyForum,May2013.Photo:UNIDO.

Oceanthermalenergyconversionisprobablytheoldestofrenewabletechnologies.Ofcourse,peoplealsohadwindmillslongago.In1881,Ibelieve,aFrenchscientistbythenameofJacquesArsened’Arsonvalpublishedthefirstpaperonoceanthermalenergyconversion.Interestinglyitstartedinthedecadeofthe1880swheretheindustrialrevolutionstartedwiththefirstthermalplant.SoOTECisnotarocket-sciencetechnology.Whenyoulookatit,itisareallysimpletechnology,morelikerefrigerationthananythingelse.Inyourairconditionunityouuseelectricity,createcoldanddischargeheat.OTECjustreversesthatcycle.TheOTECplantisapipingsystemfromtheoceanwithawarm-waterpipe,acold-waterpipeandareturningpipe.Ittakesthewarmpartoftheoceantovaporizetheammonia,orwhateveritisfromliquidtogas,whichincreasesitsvolumetremendouslybecauseofthetransitionintoagaseousstate.So,ithastheabilitytowork.Itrunsaturbine,whichinturnrunsageneratorandwehaveelectricity.Theexhaustfromtheturbineisthencooledinthedepthsoftheoceanatabout1,000metres,withwatertemperaturesaround4to6degreesCelsius,whichcondensebacktheammoniaandclosethecycle.Itchangesnothingintheenvironment,exceptfromremovingheatfromtheocean,whichissomethingwereallywanttogetridofanyway.

ThethingwelikeaboutOTECisthatithasanumberofotheroptionsandrenewableenergysources.One,itprovidesyouwithdesalinatedwater.Asyouaredealingwithwarmsurfacewaterwithlotsofdissolvedgases,youneedtoremovethembecausetheymakeheatexchangeinefficient.Forthatyouusethesametechnologyastoconcentrateorangejuice:flashevaporation–puttingitundervacuum.Whenyouputthingsundervacuum,theyboilatamuchlowertemperature.Soyoupullofftheoxygen,nitrogenandalotofwatervapour.Then,withsomeofthecoldwater,youcancondensethewatervapourandgetdesalinatedwater.OTECisthecheapestmethodofdesalination.Desalination,usuallybymembraneseparation,isveryenergy-intensive.OnlyOTECgivesusfreshwaterasaproduct.Formanyislands,freshwaterisoneofthebiggestproblems.Mostofus,particularlyPacificislands,dependonaverythinlensoffreshwaterandtwothingsarehappeningtothatlens.One,sealevelisrising,sothehydraulicheadischangingandsaltisintruding.Second,rainfallisnotasabundantasitusedtobeandthereforethelensisunderpressure.Weneedtoaugmentthewater.Third,thecoldwaterthatwebringupisnutrient-rich.So,wecanproducealotoffish.Becausetheoceantemperatureisgettingwarmer,fisharemovingawayfromtheshore,whichisaproblembecauseitistheretheretheyusuallybreedandourlittlecanoescannotgothatfarouttocatchthefish.Thereforefisherfolkarehavingaterribletimeinmostislandeconomies.WithOTEC,wecandoalotofmaricultureandproduceveryexpensivethingslikeabalone(largeedibleseasnails),lobstersandoysters,becausewehavethewaterattherighttemperaturecontinuously.Therealotsofindustriesthatcanusethiscoldwater.

Ourthirdtechnologygoesbacktoourcollectivesurvival:biomass.Someofusaretoosmalltobemajorproducersofbiomass,butsomeofusarebig,withenoughlandtoproducelotsofbiomass.Weusedtoproducesugarcane,bananasandcoconutforexport.Nowthereisasecondgenerationofbiomasstechnologies:thermaltechnologies,whichconvertbiomassintoliquidfuels.Wetargetthreestreams,heavyfueloil,dieselforpowergenerationanddieselfortransport.Weareworkingonamodelwherethebigislandsproducetherawmaterial,whichissenttoourlittleislands,wheretheydotheconversionforthemselvesandintheprocesstheyco-generatesomeelectricityandendupwiththeirownliquidfuelstoreplacethosethreestreams.

Webelievethiskindofmenuoftechnologies,supplementedwithPVandwindwhereverpossible,basicallycangetustoahighdegreeofenergysecurityandenergyindependence.Wehaveamodelandwewanttogetitdemonstratedsothatatleastwecanembarrassthebigguysandsay,“Wediditwithallthehandicapsthatwehave!Howaboutyou?”

Page 3: “Sustainable Energy for All- 5Cs

Haveyougotpartnersforthetechnologytransfer?Yousaidthatduetoclimatechangeyouaregoingtolosealotofinfrastructure.Whatisatstake?

WehavehadsomediscussionswiththeJapanesegovernment,whoarethetechnologicalleadersinthosetwoareas.WeactuallyfindourselvesfeelingmoreandmoreaffinityfortheJapanesetechnologies.Maybeitisbecausetheyarefar-flungislandsandtheyhavealotofsimilarconditions.Ofcourse,theyaremuch,muchricherandtheyhavemorecapacitythanwehave.Butintermsofhelpingusfindsolutionsthatareappropriate,welooktothemalotmorethantootherindustrializedcountries.Ofcourse,languageisanissuebutwelikethetechnologiesthattheyhave.andwewanttobeinthatgamebecausewehavetoreplaceourindustries.Oneofthebigindustriesthatwehavetoreplaceistourism.Wewillnothavetourismmuchlonger.Wedidastudylookingatonemetreofsealevelrise.JustfortheCaribbean.Wedidn’twanttodoitforthePacificbecauseitwasgoingtobeterriblenews.So,wediditforsomeislandsoftheCaribbean,Jamaicabeingthebiggestone.ItturnedoutthatwewouldloseaboutaUS$100bnnotintermsofoureconomy,justininfrastructure:beaches,airports,ports,hotels,roads.Itwillallbegonebecauseweareislandsandmostoftheinfrastructureisalongthecoast.JusttoexplaintherelevanceofthatUS$100bn,ourwholeeconomyintheEnglish-speakingCaribbeanamountstoUS$75bnandUS$25bnofthatisfromTrinidadandTobago,whichisanoil-exportingcountry.So,youcanseethatthisamountofdamageisreallysignificantforthesecountries.Weneedtokeepthisinmind.Still,let’snotwavethewhiteflagsyet,wewillfight.Wehavereasonstobescared,butwealsohavereasonstobehopefulthatwecanusesomeofthesetechnologiestomakelifeliveable,atleastuntilSE4Allbringstheemissionsdowntoalevelwherewethinkthattheclimatehasafuture.

Inthepaneldiscussion,youalsotalkedaboutengineeringtrainingandknowledgetransfer.Inthisrespect,doyouthinkUNIDOcouldcontributetotheSIDSDOCKinitiative?

UNIDOisapartoftheUNthatwedon’tseemuchintheCaribbeanatall.Asamatteroffact,wedon’tseeUNIDOmuchonislands.Butwewanttoseenewindustrieslinkedtotheenergysector.Forexample,inbiofuels,wewanttodevelopactivatedcarboncapacitorsandstoragedevices,andthenthereissolarthermalcooling.InthecaseofOTEC,wewanttodevelopcoldwaterindustriesformaricultureanddesalination.Inthoseareas,ifUNIDOhadexpertisewewouldwelcomeit.Moreproductivepartnerswouldbegreat.Wewanttohaveasmanypartnersaswecanbecauseoursituationisvery,verybad.Whatwedon’twantarepartnerswhowillcometotelluswhatweshouldbedoing.Unfortunatelywehavealotexperiencewiththat.Wehavetosay,“Wedidn’taskyoutocometelluswhattodoandhowtodoit.”Wesay,“Wewanttodevelopourprojects.Canyouhelpusdoit?Andifyoucan’thelpus,thanks,butno,thanks.Don’tmakeitanymoredifficultthanitis.”

●AlbertBingerisScienceandPolicyAdvisorattheCaribbeanCommunityClimateChangeCentre.HeismemberoftheTechnicalGroupoftheUNSecretary-General’sHigh-LevelGrouponSustainableEnergyforAllandhasbeenSeniorAdvisorattheAllianceofSmallIslandStates.Bingerisaresearchscientistwithalmost30yearsexperienceindiversescientificareas,includingchemicalengineering,biophysics,agronomy,renewableenergyandclimatechange.From1997-2005,hewasProfessorandDirectorfortheUniversityoftheWestIndiesCentreforEnvironmentandDevelopment.

Furtherreading:GlobalPublicGoodsandPotentialMechanismsforFinancingAvailability

PostedinAllPosts,Extra!|Tagged400ppm,adaptation,AlbertBinger,AllianceofSmallIslandStates,biomass,Caribbean,CaribbeanCommunityClimateChangeCentre,climatechange,COP15,CopenhagenClimateChangeConference,desalination,energy,geothermal,hydro,Jamaica,Japan,LEDs,Maldives,mariculture,MiraKapfinger,mitigation,NationalFinancingMechanism,Nike,Norway,oceanthermal,oceanthermaltechnology,renewables,sealevel,SIDSDOCK,smallislanddevelopingstates,solar,solarthermal,SOLID,SustainableEnergyforAll,Tuvalu,UNIDO,UnitedNations,UnitedNationsFrameworkConventiononClimateChange,ViennaEnergyForum,wind

Making It

Copyright©2013UNIDO.

WordPressdatabaseerror:[Table'./wordpressMI/wp_wassup'ismarkedascrashedandlast(automatic?)repairfailed]INSERT DELAYED INTO wp_wassup (wassup_id, ̀timestamp̀, ip, hostname, urlrequested, agent, referrer, search,

searchpage, os, browser, language, screen_res, searchengine, spider, feed, username, comment_author, spam) VALUES (

'9af5179ae0051312da7c890fcb204e62', '1373474228', '65.48.252.50', '65.48.252.50', '/?p=6748', 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64)

AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.116 Safari/537.36', 'http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Carbon-War-Room-2792503?

gid=2792503&csrfToken=ajax%3A3468246164768609214&trk=leena_join&impid=&pgkey=group_most_popular&report%2Esuccess=jI5B4vNr34k2dUziKeq-

aeIwChBQD1VB6ZnLUYa6ghn3aSS_JMipxaawyNLLBNIrgrK5xeEkxWwX_PnrCi7baLYTgWkvRmq7kvwXUQ1jkrkvR7AM2ZM9Mra9CriX7eAus_8fR_NwC-

k9N1RMJM3b__YDuaTWhbxDTDQfY_H86WoK7RADsPWGr_zT6PML_K7B8ZkwBraBtLLkBeEsH7o9B-Hj0aWXhK9BTKn6Y_zwt-jQkmmMsUvpi-eukhWXhZNMiLTS_qq', '',

'0', 'WinNT 6.1', 'Google Chrome', 'us', '', '', '', '', '', '', '0' )