swackhamer - what can states do: lessons from the california green chemistry initiative
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Deb Swackhamer of the University of Minnesota Humphrey School of Public Affairs, Center for Science Technology and Public Policy at the July 20, 2011 meeting of the MN Chemical Regulation and Policy Project Work Group. http://www.environmental-initiative.org/projects/minnesota-chemical-regulation-a-policyTRANSCRIPT
Lessons from the California Green Chemistry Initiative
Some Context: Excerpts from memo from CA Secretary of Environmental Protec8on � “A growing body of science and literature is emerging identifying a
variety of concerns and challenges regarding the use and regulation of chemicals.
� In the absence of a unifying approach, interest groups and policy makers have been attempting to take these issues on one-‐by-‐one. Product by product, chemical by chemical, and now even city by city approaches can often have unintended, even regrettable consequences, even with the best of intentions.
� we need to develop a coordinated, comprehensive strategy designed to foster the development of information on the hazards posed by chemicals, ways to reduce exposure to dangerous substances, approaches that encourage cleaner and less polluting industrial processes, and strategies to encourage manufacturers to take greater responsibility for the products they produce.
� Our strategy, and the policy that it champions, must have at its core and be governed by sound science.”
“California Green Chemistry Ini3a3ve Phase 1: A Compila3on of Op3ons”, January 2008
Conversation with California � brainstorming sessions – 6 all around the state, multi-‐stakeholder
� Green Chemistry symposia – 3 on variety of topics � a web log – to invite ideas to be conveyed and discussed online
� the Science Advisory Panel – to sift through results of Conversation and recommend options
� preparation of Phase 1 Report
“Green Chemistry Op3ons for the State of California: A Report from the Green Chemistry Ini3a3ve Science Advisory Panel to Department of Toxic Substances Control Director, Maureen Gorsen”, May 2008
� Seven months of science expert panel � Framework for advancing green chemistry and a collection of options that have been proposed by one or more individuals on the Panel
� Will require utilization of policy instruments to increase both supply of and demand for greener chemicals
Supply-‐side Op8ons � help to facilitate the creation and dissemination of greener chemicals, processes and technologies:
� instilling green chemistry into education � supporting research and innovation in green chemistry and engineering
� building green chemistry capacity � providing incentives to industry and recognition of its efforts
Demand-‐side Op8ons � help to ensure the economic viability of greener chemicals by better informing the market, leveling the playing field on which greener options compete, and creating a regulatory climate that drives both the development and the adoption of greener alternatives:
� identifying and prioritizing chemicals or chemical uses of concern
� developing, improving and effectively employing regulations � developing incentives to boost demand for green chemistry
Addressing all three gaps in data, safety and technology:
� supply-‐side focuses more on the technology gap � demand side targets the data gap and safety gap
II. Green Chem Op3ons for CA—the Supply Side
II. A. Green Chemistry and Engineering Education
� 1: Train K-‐12 Science Educators � 2: Develop K-‐12 Green Chemistry Teaching Materials � 3: Develop Green Chem Interdisciplinary Education Courses � 4: Integrate Green Chemistry into Higher Education Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Curricula � 5: Develop Fellowships and Internships in Green Chemistry � 6: Promote Green Chemistry in Business School Education � 7: Support new Faculty Positions in Green Chemistry � 8: Introduce Green Chemistry into Vocational and Workforce Development Training Programs
Supply-‐side, Con3nued
II. B. Research, Invention, and Innovation in the Context of Green Chemistry and Engineering � 9: Implement a process to identify all on-‐going efforts in Green Chemistry Science & Technology, identify gaps � 10: Support Green Chemistry R&D Efforts � 11: Promote, Encourage, and Facilitate the Development of
Industry – University Partnerships � 12: Strengthen the Green Chemistry Infrastructure
Supply-‐side, Con3nued
II. C. Other Incentives to Boost Green Chem Supply
� 13: Implement management system approaches for California Chemical Manufacturers � 14: Promote Green Chemistry by Industry Associations � 15: Promote Value Chain Communications � 16: Awards programs and competitions: Establish Green Chemistry Innovation Awards, Governor’s Green Chemistry Award, and/or Green Chemistry Business Plan Competition � 17: Establish a “California Chemistry Research Challenge” � 18: Develop a “Green Chemistry Web Portal” � 19: Add Green Chemistry to State Technical Assistance Programs
Supply-‐side, Con3nued
II. D. Evaluating Products, Problems and Potential New Solutions � 20: Advance the Science of Alternatives Assessment
� 21: Establish one or more independent non-‐profit institutes to identify, develop, and test safer
alternatives
III. Green Chem – The Demand Side
III. A. Identifying and prioritizing chemicals of concern � 22: Adopt a policy to identify chemicals of concern, and develop specific criteria for this purpose � 23: Develop a comprehensive “map” of the flow of chemicals in California � 24: Help advance the science of toxicology � 25: Target Chemical Uses of Concern Based on
Hazard, Exposure and Risk
Demand-‐side, Con3nued III. B. Regulations
� 26. Require chemical manufacturers and importers to provide specific information about hazards and uses of their products. � 27: Require companies to provide chemical information to Cal/EPA that they submit to other authorities � 28: Require product manufacturers and importers to disclose chemical ingredients � 29: Require chemical makers and users to systematically identify and consider safer alternatives � 30: Authorize Cal/EPA to phase out hazardous chemicals � 31: Phase out chlorinated solvents � 32: Require all air quality management districts to adopt SCAQMD regulations on cleaning products
Demand-‐side, Con3nued
III. C. Incentives to Boost Demand for Green Chem
� 33: Provide retailers with access to guides for selecting greener alternatives to toxic products, via a retailer clearinghouse. � 34: Develop a “green scorecard” for chemical products that lets both producers & consumers know which products truly are greener. � 35: Screen chemical product formulations for safety, health and environmental preferability, based on full ingredient disclosure by the producer to the screener. � 36: Incorporate green chemistry criteria into state procurement processes. � 37: Provide marketing exposure for green chemistry products and
processes. � 38: Create a web-‐based marketplace for greener chemicals and products