swwt plenary meeting / 28 june 2011 brussels atmospheric effects topical group reporting period:...

12
SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+ theme 3: density and winds

Upload: ian-cannon

Post on 27-Mar-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels

Atmospheric Effects Topical GroupReporting period: 2010 – June 2011

1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA)3.ESA GOCE+ theme 3: density and winds

Page 2: SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels

ATMOP

Advanced Thermosphere Modelling for Orbit Prediction

Space Call 3 – FP7-SPACE-2010-1

Page 3: SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels

ATMOP partners

• DEIMOS Space (DMS), Spain– Project Leader (PL): N. Sánchez Ortiz, Project Coordinator

• Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France– LPG Grenoble: Ch. Lathuillère (PL) ; LPC2E, Orléans: Th. Dodok de Wit ;

LATMOS, Paris : M. Menvielle

• Collecte Localisation Satellites (CLS), France– PL: J.-J. Valette

• Met Office (MET), United Kingdom– PL: D. Jackson

• Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES), France– PL: S. Bruinsma

• University College London (UCL), United Kingdom– PL: A. Aylward

• Kybertec S.R.O (KYBERTEC), Czech Republic– PL: O. Sládek

Page 4: SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels

ATMOP objectives

• DTM: Development of an advanced semi-empirical Drag Temperature Model

– that has the potential to be adapted for near-real-time operation and – that is accurate enough to meet the requirements set by space agencies for orbit

computations..

• PHMOD: Physical modelling of the thermosphere• PROX: Define and assess new proxies to describe the external

(EUV and geomagnetic) forcing of the Thermosphere by the Sun which take advantage of the present state of the art in observational and data analysis capabilities.

• THERM: Support European research activities on forecasting techniques:

– by upgrading assimilation of thermospheric data into an existing semi-empirical model for near-real time prediction

– by developing thermospheric data assimilation based on a global physical thermosphere-ionosphere coupled model (CMAT2)

Page 5: SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels

ATMOP Work Packages

WP1 Project Management DEIMOSWPL: N. Sánchez Ortiz

WP2Forcing the thermosphere: physical processes and proxies for semi-empirical modelling

CNRSWPL: Ch. Lathuillère

PROX, DTM, PHMOD

WP3Physical Modelling of thermospheric drag processes

UCLWPL: A. Aylward

PHMOD, DTM

WP4Semi-empirical modelling of the thermosphere

CNESWPL: S. Bruinsma

DTM

WP5Data assimilation for global analysis and near-real time prediction

Met OfficeWPL: D. Jackson

THERM, DTM, PHMOD

WP6 Dissemination CNRSWPL: M. Menvielle

Page 6: SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels

ATMOP outputs and deliveries• Fully documented harmonized database of thermospheric densities • ATMOP website:

– CD with all documentation and software for website installation on any platform

• Solar EUV bands and proxies to be used as inputs for the DTM model:– Recommendations for the most appropriate EUV bands and proxies – Numerical database – Nowcast and prototype forecast

• Geomagnetic proxies to be used as inputs for the DTM model:– Recommendations for the most appropriate EUV bands and proxies – Numerical database – Nowcast and prototype forecast

• Physical investigations on electrodynamic forcing • Comparison between physical model (CMAT2) outputs and

observation data

11

22

33

To assist development of the semi-empirical thermospheric density model DTM by evaluating possible improvements and changes using a physical model of the coupled thermosphere-ionosphere system

Page 7: SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels

1 (database)

1 (database)

NB: GRACE-B in 1/2011 and both GRACE this month have accelerometers off

Page 8: SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels

Decompose all quantities X(t) into slowly-varying (DC) andfluctuating (AC) components: X(t) = XDC(t) + XAC(t)

2 (EUV proxies)2 (EUV proxies)

DC: using baseline (rms and rank correlations for reconstructed densities)

AC: using Output Error model (below: 2D map of correlations as a function of scale)

Page 9: SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels

Page 10: SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels

Presentations are on-line and can be downloaded:http://ccar.colorado.edu/muri/index.html

Page 11: SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels

NADIR Focus Areas:

NADIR PI Jeff Forbes presented the project to ATMOP in Toulouse on 14 June and the existing collaboration - items I and IV - is expected to be extended to include II, III, V, VI and VII.

A joint workshop in Boulder is planned for October.

Page 12: SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels

Contract signed, project KO in March 2011

GOCE Launch: 17 mars 2009 de Plesetsk

Mission objectives: High-resolution gravity field of the Earth

Mission orbit: Sun-synchronous, dawn/dusk, at 255 km

Payload: Gradiometer (accelerometers), GPS

Drag control: Ion thrusters commanded in closed-loop

• GOCE mission extended to 12/2012 (and second extension will be requested);

• Mission altitude expected to remain at 255 km thanks to weak solar cycle;

• First density results expected by the end of the year.