sxsw proposal: charter schools: necessary, but not the answer

18
Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer How outcome-based thinking and industrial model leadership stifles educational innovation Prospectus for SXSW-Edu March 3–6, 2014 Steven Zimmerman

Upload: openschooleportfolio

Post on 22-Nov-2014

160 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

We can talk ad nauseam about innovation and entrepreneurism in public education, but our schools will continue to resist being laboratories of innovation until we come to grips with fundamental flaws in our thinking about educational leadership and our obsession with outcomes. All the technology in the world will not fundamentally change an industrial-model of education that relies on top-down leadership that treats academic achievement as a “bottom line.” Charter schools were seen by many as a way to inject entrepreneurism into a sclerotic structure, and they have been a disruptive and, often, positive force. But the charter school movement itself has embraced the testing dogma in an attempt to outflank traditional schools and it has fallen in love with replication and franchises, which are anathema to real innovation. What is needed is collaborative leadership that encourages risk-taking and an insistence upon measuring things that are meaningful.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

How outcome-based thinking and industrial model leadership stifles

educational innovation

Prospectus for SXSW-Edu March 3–6, 2014Steven Zimmerman

Page 2: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Anti-innovation forces at work in public schools

Obsession with outcomesMedieval leadership structure

Industrial Age Operations

Page 3: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Treating academic outcomes as “bottom line" is bad business practice

● Great businesses are not focused on the bottom line—they produce great products and services and the bottom line takes care of itself.

● Obsession with bottom line leads to destruction of workplace morale, cutting corners and worse.

● Application of Campbell’s Law

Page 4: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Top-down leadership

● Based on "big man" model of charisma and/or fear

● Essentially un-American and anti-democratic

● Creates sycophants, not thinkers and inventors

● Top-down leadership + bottom line obsession = school you would not want to send your kids to

Page 5: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Industrial-Era School Operations ● Disregard of business management theory● Centralized purchasing destroys autonomy ● HR reinforces conformity instead of mission● IT operations are controlling, not liberating

Page 6: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Are Charter Schools a Solution?

Goal was to improve student "outcomes" by● Providing alternative models of education● Encouraging entrepreneurism

How has it succeeded? Where has it failed?

Basic charter paradigm—autonomy in exchange for accountability—is unassailable

Page 7: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Charter School Successes

1. Autonomy HAS spurred innovation—many different models are being implemented.

2. Decentralization of purchasing creates opportunities.3. Many ed-tech startups have been launched from charter

school partnerships.4. Traditional public schools can no longer operate in

default mode; many now have to compete for students.

These would not have happened on their own!

Page 8: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Charter School Failure #1:Over emphasis on Replication and Scaling up

Scaling up leads to a franchise model Franchising is based on conformity, not innovation

Page 9: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Charter School Failure #2No relief from bottom line worship

● Renewal of charter largely dependent upon test scores● Regulatory creep = forced regression to the mean

Page 10: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Charter School Failure #3Grownups fighting other grownups

Nonstop fighting between charter school advocates and teachers' unions. Everyone acting in the best interests of

children...

Page 11: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Charter School Failure #4Hubris

Page 12: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

What’s the Answer?

Innovation in education will only come from idealistic teachers who have not yet been beaten down by the system. Schools that give rein to these teachers and encourage them

to try new things and take risks are the ones that will succeed in making the classroom experience

relevant to children.

Page 13: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Democracy Innovation

How do we do it?

● Encourage risk-taking● Allow failure to happen

● Insist upon shared leadership

Page 14: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Authentic Assessment

Project-based Learning

How do we do it?

Students must perform and teachers must assess real-world tasks that demonstrate meaningful application of essential knowledge and skills.

Page 15: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Leadership Culture

How do we do it?

Define what leadership means for your school cultureEnsure hiring practices reinforce a culture of innovation

Avoid traditional interview processes Create 360º feedback

Page 16: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Mission- driven HR

Authentic Evaluation

How do we do it?

All operations policies must support school mission.

Page 17: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Charter Schools must lead

● Fight regulatory creep● Produce more independent models and stop

replicating - this isn't Blade Runner● Stop playing the junkyard dog of test movement● Stop fighting teachers unions and get rid of elements

who want to use the movement as a stalking horse for privatization of public education

They have the autonomy to set the right example, but to do so they must:

Page 18: SXSW Proposal: Charter Schools: Necessary, but not the Answer

Open School Projectwww.open-schools.org

● Community-based, democratically-operated schools

● Open Model of governance & operations

Democracy in education = innovation