symbolic language
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Dimensions of
Biblical Language
![Page 2: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
¡Be Careful How You Approach the Runway!
![Page 3: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Figurative Language
The true sense is not in the literal
meaning of the words or phrases but
in some similarity these words and
phrases have with the reality being
symbolized.
![Page 4: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
The Experience of the Tadpole
The Hidden World
The Visible World
![Page 5: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
![Page 6: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Literal Interpretation seeks the
original meaning according to the intention
of the author.
![Page 7: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
literalor figurative.
That Meaning May be Either
![Page 8: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
physicalor spiritual.
That Meaning May be Either
![Page 9: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
LANGUAGE
figu
rative
lite
ral
The first dimension is the language dimension. This
has to do with what the authors intended when they
wrote the words. Did they intend the language to be
understood literally or were they using the language
metaphorically to point to another reality?
![Page 10: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
DIM
EN
SIO
N
spiritual
physical
The second dimension
is the ontological
dimension. To which
reality does the
language point? Is it
referring to Spiritual
reality or Physical
reality?
![Page 11: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
figu
rative
lite
ralspiritual
physical
When we intersect
these two dimensions,
we get four
possibilities.
![Page 12: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
2
43
1
figu
rative
lite
ralspiritual
physical
![Page 13: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• Angels
• Souls
• Demons
figu
rative
lite
ralspiritual
physical
In some cases, the biblical
writer intended his language
to be taken literally in
reference to spiritual realities.
![Page 14: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Thrones
• Dragon
• Trumpets
figu
rative
lite
ralspiritual
physical
Sometimes, the writer
intended the language to be
taken figuratively in reference
to spiritual realities. This is
necessary because, limited to
our physical world, we don’t
have direct personal
experience of these realities.
So, the authors must use
comparison to speak of these
spiritual realities.
![Page 15: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
figu
rative
lite
ralspiritual
physical
• New Earth
• Every eye shall see
• Resurrection
Other times, the writer
uses literal language to
speak of physical
realities. In these
instances, interpreters do
an injustice to the text
when they make the
words say something
spiritual or metaphorical.
![Page 16: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
figu
rative
lite
ralspiritual
physical
• Babylon
• The Beast
• Abomination of Desolation
• The big apple
In the fourth quadrant, we
have figurative language
that is intended to refer to
physical realities.
![Page 17: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• Thrones
• Dragons
• Trumpets
• Angels
• Souls
• Demons
figu
rative
lite
ralspiritual
physical
• Babylon
• The Beast
• Abomination of Desolation
• New Earth
• Every eye shall see
• Resurrection
![Page 18: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Literalism
Literalism occurs when the reader imposes a literal
(or physical) interpretation on language that was
originally intended to be taken figuratively.
![Page 19: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
“How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter
the second time into his mother's womb and be
born?(Juan 3:4).
Literalism
![Page 20: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Principles of Interpretation
• The Analogy of Faith
• Contextual Limitation
• Prophetic Perspective
![Page 21: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Analogy of Faith
“Each book proceeded from the same divine mind, so the
teaching of the Bible’s sixty-six books will be complementary
and self-consistent. If we cannot yet see this, the fault is in
us, not in Scripture. It is certain that Scripture nowhere
contradicts Scripture; rather, one passage explains another.
This sound principle of interpreting Scripture by Scripture is
sometimes called the analogy of Scripture or the analogy of
faith.”
J. I. Packer, Concise Theology: A Guide to Historic Christian Beliefs (Wheaton, Ill.:
Tyndale House, 1995).
![Page 22: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Analogy of Faith
“If the Scriptures be what they claim to be, the word of God,
they are the work of one mind, and that mind divine. From
this it follows that Scripture cannot contradict Scripture. God
cannot teach in one place anything which is inconsistent with
what He teaches in another. Hence Scripture must explain
Scripture. If a passage admits of different interpretations,
that only can be the true one which agrees with what the
Bible teaches elsewhere on the same subject.”
Charles Hodge, vol. 1, Systematic Theology (Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research
Systems, Inc., 1997), 187.
![Page 23: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
1. Textual
2. Inter-Textual
3. Intra-Textual
4. Historical
5. Literary
6. Geographical
7. Cultural
8. Socio-Political
9. Covenantal
10. Spiritual
Contextual Limitation
![Page 24: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Text
![Page 25: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Textual
Text
• Words
• Syntax
• Author’s Argument
![Page 26: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Textual
Text
Inter-Textual• Parallel Passages
• Direct Usage of
another biblical
passage
• Quotations
• Conceptual
Dependencies
![Page 27: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Textual
Text
Inter-Textual
Intra-Textual
The relationship
between a biblical
passage and other
non-canonical
historical
documents.
![Page 28: Symbolic Language](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051320/58edcfc71a28abe5678b45ab/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Contextual Limitation
Application should be made at paragraph level, not word
level. Words have meaning only in context; clauses have
meaning only in context; sentences have meaning only in
context. The only inspired person involved in the interpretive
process is the original author. . . . We must abide by the
original author’s intent. Application must relate specifically to
the general intent of the whole writing, the specific literary
unit and paragraph level thought development.
Robert James Dr. Utley, You Can Understand the Bible! (Marshall, Texas: Bible Lessons
International, 1996), 5.