symptom score unit

7
Supplementary material Figure 1. Histograms showing the distributions of SBCMV-response traits in the Meridiano × Claudio (MxC) recombinant inbred line population (181 RILs) and in the durum wheat germplasm panel (111 elite accessions). Distributions are reported for four field trials carried out in Northern Italy (Po valley) under high disease pressure. The M×C data refer to field experiments carried out at Cadriano (44°35’N 11°27’E) in 2007 and 2008 while the germplasm panel data refer to field experiments carried out at Minerbio (44°37’N 11°29’E ) in 2003 and 2004. The SBCMV-response traits considered were: symptom severity (SS) visually scored following a 0-4 scale and leaf virus concentration determined using DAS-ELISA and reported as absorbance units at 405 nm. Symptom scoring and leaf sampling were carried out on four dates in the M×C RIL experiments and on two dates in the germplasm panel experiments at the plant growth stages showing the maximum disease symptom intensity, i.e. from mid-end of tillering (Z25 in the Zadoks scale, Zadoks et al., 1974) to first (Z31) and second (Z32) node appearance (corresponding to a period from the end of February to April). Mean values for the RILs (M×C), Meridiano (M), Claudio (C) and for the highly susceptible check cv. Grazia (G) are indicated with arrows and reported together with the corresponding standard deviation in parenthesis.

Upload: licia

Post on 05-Jan-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Supplementary material Figure 1. Histograms showing the distributions of SBCMV-response traits in the Meridiano × Claudio (MxC) recombinant inbred line population (181 RILs) and in the durum wheat germplasm panel (111 elite accessions). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Symptom score unit

Supplementary material Figure 1. Histograms showing the distributions of SBCMV-response traits in the Meridiano × Claudio (MxC) recombinant inbred line population (181 RILs) and in the durum wheat germplasm panel (111 elite accessions).Distributions are reported for four field trials carried out in Northern Italy (Po valley) under high disease pressure. The M×C data refer to field experiments carried out at Cadriano (44°35’N 11°27’E) in 2007 and 2008 while the germplasm panel data refer to field experiments carried out at Minerbio (44°37’N 11°29’E ) in 2003 and 2004.The SBCMV-response traits considered were: symptom severity (SS) visually scored following a 0-4 scale and leaf virus concentration determined using DAS-ELISA and reported as absorbance units at 405 nm.

Symptom scoring and leaf sampling were carried out on four dates in the M×C RIL experiments and on two dates in the germplasm panel experiments at the plant growth stages showing the maximum disease symptom intensity, i.e. from mid-end of tillering (Z25 in the Zadoks scale, Zadoks et al., 1974) to first (Z31) and second (Z32) node appearance (corresponding to a period from the end of February to April).

Mean values for the RILs (M×C), Meridiano (M), Claudio (C) and for the highly susceptible check cv. Grazia (G) are indicated with arrows and reported together with the corresponding standard deviation in parenthesis.

Page 2: Symptom score unit

Symptom score unit

RIL

nu

mb

er

Symptom score unit

RIL

nu

mb

er

Symptom score unit

Symptom score unit

100

MxC RIL SS2-07

0 1 2 3 4

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2

MxC RIL SS3-07

0 3 4

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

RIL

nu

mb

er

MxC RIL SS4-07

0 1 2 3 4

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

RIL

nu

mb

er

MxC RIL SS1-07

0 1 2 3 4

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

70

RIL

(1.

3)

100

C (

1.9

± 0.

7)

M (

0.1

± 0.

1)

G (

3.2

± 0.

3)

RIL

(1.

4)

C (

2.1

± 0.

5)

M (

0.1

± 0.

1)

G (

3.1

± 0.

2)

RIL

(1.

6)

C (

2.7

± 0.

3)

M (

0.3

± 0.

3)

G (

3.8

± 0.

3)

RIL

(1.

2)

C (

2.5

± 0.

3)

M (

0.1

± 0.

1)

G (

3.1

± 0.

2)

Page 3: Symptom score unit

MxC RIL ELISA2-07 MxC RIL ELISA4-07

210.5 1.50

10

20

30

40

50

60

210.5 1.50

10

20

30

40

50

60

Absorbance units (A 405 nm)

RIL

nu

mb

er

RIL

nu

mb

er

Absorbance units (A 405 nm)

RIL

(1.

2)

M (

0.8

± 0.

5)

G (

1.5

± 0.

3)

C (

1.4

± 0.

3)

RIL

(1.

4)

M (

1.2

± 0.

6)

G (

1.9

± 0.

2)

C (

1.8

± 0.

2)

Page 4: Symptom score unit

MxC RIL SS1-08

MxC RIL SS2-08 MxC RIL SS4-08

0 1 2 3 4

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2

0 1 2 3 4

0 1 2 3 4

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Symptom score unit

RIL

nu

mb

er

MxC RIL SS3-08

0 3 4

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Symptom score unit

RIL

nu

mb

er

Symptom score unit

RIL

nu

mb

er

RIL

nu

mb

er

Symptom score unit

RIL

(1.

5)

G (

3.5

± 0.

3)

C (

2.2

± 0.

5)

M (

0.3

± 0.

4)

RIL

(1.

7)

G (

3.5

± 0.

3)

C (

2.3

± 0.

5)

M (

0.2

± 0.

0)

RIL

(1.

3)

G (

3.6

± 0.

3)

C (

1.8

± 0.

7)

M (

0.0

± 0.

0)

RIL

(0.

6)

G (

2.0

± 0.

9)

C (

0.4

± 0.

4) M

(0.

0 ±

0.0)

Page 5: Symptom score unit

10

20

30

40

50

60MxC RIL ELISA2-08

210.5 1.50

Absorbance units (A 405 nm)

RIL

nu

mb

er

MxC RIL ELISA4-08

10

20

30

40

50

60

Absorbance units (A 405 nm)

RIL

nu

mb

er

RIL

(1.

2)

G (

2.0

± 0.

0)

C (

1.6

± 0.

6)

M (

0.4

± 0.

7)

RIL

(1.

1)

M (

0.3

± 0.

4)

210.5 1.50

C (

1.9

± 0.

2)

G (

2.0

± 0.

0)

Page 6: Symptom score unit

Durum Panel SS1-03

Durum Panel SS2-03

0 1 2 3 4

0 1 2 3 4

20

30

50

10

40

10

20

30

40

50

Durum Panel SS2-04

0 1 2 3 4

10

20

30

40

50

Symptom score unit

Durum Panel SS1-04

0 1 2 3 4

10

20

30

40

50A

cce

ssio

n

nu

mb

er

Acc

ess

ion

n

um

be

r

Symptom score unit

Symptom score unit

Acc

ess

ion

n

um

be

rA

cce

ssio

n

nu

mb

er

Symptom score unit

G (

2.7

± 0.

2)

G (

2.8

± 0.

2)

G (

3.3

± 0.

3)

G (

2.7

± 0.

0)

Page 7: Symptom score unit

Durum Panel ELISA1-03

210.5 1.50

10

20

30

40

50

60

Durum Panel ELISA2-03

10

20

30

40

50

60

Durum Panel ELISA1-04

Durum Panel ELISA2-04

10

20

30

40

50

60

10

20

30

40

50

60Absorbance units (A 405 nm)

Acc

ess

ion

nu

mb

er

Acc

ess

ion

nu

mb

er

210.5 1.50

210.5 1.50 210.5 1.50

Absorbance units (A 405 nm)

Absorbance units (A 405 nm)

Absorbance units (A 405 nm)

G (

1.4

± 0.

2)

G (

1.7

± 0.

0)

G (

1.4

± 0.

1)

G (

1.8

± 0.

0)