synopsis rinkal

Upload: rinkal-patel

Post on 03-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Synopsis Rinkal

    1/6

    Comparative study between IGM detection by

    Immunochromatography and WIDAL test in enteric fever

    NAME OF THE, STUDENT :RINKAL PATEL

    NAME OF THE SUPERVISOR(S):____________

    PLACE OF WORK :MUMBAI

    DATE (MONTH AND YEAR) OF SUBMISSION:_________________

  • 7/28/2019 Synopsis Rinkal

    2/6

    TOPIC

    Comparative study between IGM detection by Immunochromatography and WIDAL test

    in enteric fever.

    Introduction

    Typhoid fever continues to be a global health problem, especially in tropics and

    subtropics(1-4) Typhoid fever remains a significant health problem in many developing

    countries.Early and accurate diagnosis is necessary for prompt and effective treatment.Classically, typhoid fever is considered a disease of multiple stages: 1) the first week is

    characterized by progressive elevation of the temperature, followed by bacteremia; 2)

    the second week comes with rose spots in the skin, abdominal pain, and splenomegaly;

    3) the third week marks a more intensive intestinal inflammatory process, particularly in

    the Peyers patches, and complications may develop as digestive bleeding and

    intestinal perforation. The patients may have clinical recovery afterwards. However,

    some patients may die after a progressive clinical worsening not responsive to the

    treatment with antibiotics against Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhi

    (S.Typhi). As the clinical picture of typhoid fever is often unspecific, misdiagnosis and

    insufficient or inadequate treatment are potential risks associated with the disease.One

    has to rely on serological diagnosis since many diagnostic laboratories in

    developing countries do not have facilities for blood culture (4,5,6).

    Estimates suggest an incidence rate of more than 21.5 million cases globally in the year

    2000.Widal test is the mainstay in the diagnosis of typhoid fever in most laboratories but

    it has drawbacks(7-11). Culture may take up to seven days and requires a well-run and

    equipped laboratory, which is often not available in settings with endemic typhoid fever.

    The widely in use Widal test provides a cost efficient alternative for serological

    diagnosis, however its performance remains unsatisfying in early diagnosis. 12 The test

    further requires the establishment of a local cut off titer prior to use which is

  • 7/28/2019 Synopsis Rinkal

    3/6

    complicated. Agglutination is a classic serologic reaction that results in clumping of a

    cell suspension by a specific antibody, directed against a specific antigen. Such tests

    have been widely used for detection of antibodies against various disease-producing

    micro-organisms in serum for a long time. The Widal agglutination test, developed by F

    Widal in 18961 to aid in the diagnosis of typhoid fever, utilises a suspension of killed

    Salmonella typhias antigen, to detect typhoid fever in serum from suspected S typhi-

    infected patients who present with febrile illness. The value and clinical application of

    the Widal test in developed countries has diminished considerably in recent years2 and

    a large number of antigenically related determinants of both typhoid and non-typhoid

    Salmonella organisms are now recognised. Therefore, a rapid test with a performance

    comparable to that of blood culture would be desirable.A rapid diagnostic test for

    typhoid fever are commercially available detect immunoglobulin M (IgM) directedtowards Salmonella spp antigen in patient sera. Performance of such tests has

    previously been evaluated in a number of studies in many developing countries and

    gainiNg its own diagnostic importance in clinical practise.13,14.

    Objectives

    Considering the fact that enteric fever is endemic in developing country like India and its

    public health problem is evident in literature published worldwide its early and accurate

    diagnosis will be important for its treatment and prognosis.The objective of the study will

    be to study the tests results obtained from blood samples from suspected patients with

    enteric fever using serological diagnostic tests like conventional widal agglutination test

    and rapid IgM detection by Immunochromatography tests. The results will be compared

    for their ability of early diagnosis in such patients,the principle, time, sensitivity and

    specificity of the test.

  • 7/28/2019 Synopsis Rinkal

    4/6

    Plan Of Work And Methodology

    A prospective study will be undertaken over a period of 6 months in serological section

    of a clinical diagnostic laboratory. Following investigations will be done on the collected

    blood sample: Enterocheck-WB(ICT) & Widal test and then results will be compared

    after completion of the study.

    Inclusion criteria:

    Venous blood samples will be collected from patients peripheral vein in who

    presented with fever > 5 days or more with clinical symptoms and signs

    suggestive of typhoid fever. Whole blood,serum,plasma will be used for

    performing the test.

    Informed consent from the all the patients will be taken.

    All cases will be subjected to a detailed history and thorough clinical examination

    through referring clinician.

    Exclusion criteria:

    Patients with co-infection of malaria ,dengue or any other illness known to cross

    react with results of tests will be excluded.

    Patients already on antibiotic treatment.

    Methodology

    Widal test is a tube agglutination test The test is based on demonstrating the presence

    of agglutinin (antibody) in the serum of an infected patient, against the H (flagellar) and

    O (somatic) antigens ofSalmonella typhiand AH and BH antigens ofSalmonella

    paratyphi A and B respectively. Demonstrating a positive agglutination during the acute

    and convalescent period of infection with evidence of a four-fold rise of antibody titre

    with be suggestive of typhoid fever.Cut off titre will be decided considering localgeographical titre and semiquantitative dilutions prepared as per kit literature provided.

    Enterocheck-WB(ICT) This is rapid serological test used to enteric fever diagnosis

    based on principle of immunochromatography.This test raidly detects IgM class of

    antibodies to LPS lipopolysaccharide specific to Salmonella typhiin human

    serum,plasma or whole blood specimens.

  • 7/28/2019 Synopsis Rinkal

    5/6

    Methodology and instructions will be followed as per the kit literature provided with the

    Enterocheck-WB(ICT) and Widal test.Standard reference textbooks and literature will

    also be considered.

    All the statistical analysis will be done later for interpretation of results.

    References/Bibliography

    1. Cleary TG, Salmonella. In: Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB, eds. Nelson

    Textbook of Pediatrics, 17th edition. Philadlphia: Saunders Publishers; 2004. p.

    912-918.

    2. Ivanoff B, Levine MM, Lambert PH. Vaccination against typhoid fever: presentstatus. Bull World Health Organ 1994; 72: 957-971.

    3. Rajivi K, Gupta N, Shalini. Multidrug resistant typhoid fever. Indian J Pediatr

    2007; 74: 39-42.

    4. Jesudason M, Esther E, Mathai E. Typhidot test to detect IgG and IgM antibodies

    in typhoid fever. Indian J Med Res 2002: 116; 70-72.

    5. Ananthanarayan R, Panikar CKJ. Text Book of Microbiology, 6th edition;

    Chennai: Orient Longman; 1999.

    6. Dahir Ramos de ANDRADE & Dahir Ramos de ANDRADE JNIOR REVIEW

    TYPHOID FEVER AS CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGICAL MODELRev. Inst. Med.

    trop. S. Paulo 45(4):185-191, July-August, 2003

    7. Nsutebu EF, Ndumbe PM, Shiro K. The increase in occurence of typhoid fever in

    Cameroon: Overdiagnosis due to misuse of the Widal test?Trans R Soc Trop

    Med Hyg 2002; 96: 64-67.

    8. Olopoenia LA , King A. Widal agglutination test 100 years later: still plagued by

    controversy. Postgrad Med J 2000; 76: 80-84.

    9. Parry CM, Hoa NT, Diep TS, Wain J, Chinh NTVinh H, et al. Value of a single

    tube Widal test in diagnosis of typhoid fever in Vietnam. J Clin Microbiol 1999;

    37: 2882-2886.

  • 7/28/2019 Synopsis Rinkal

    6/6

    10..Narayanappa D, Sripathi R, Jagdishkumar K, Rajani HS.Comparative study of

    dot enzyme immunoassay (Typhidot-M) and Widal test in the diagnosis of typhoid

    fever.Indian Pediatr. 2010 Apr;47(4):331-3. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

    11.Crump JA, Luby SP, Mintz ED: The global burden of typhoid fever. Bulletin of the

    World Health Organization 2004, 82(5):346-353.

    12.Sur D, Manna B, Sen B, Deb AK, Deen JL, Wain J, von Seidlein L, Ochiai

    RL,Clemens JD, Bhattacharya SK: Evaluation of a new-generation serologic test

    for the diagnosis of typhoid fever: data from a community based surveillance in

    Calcutta, India. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 2006, 56:359-

    365.

    13.Benedikt Ley, Kamala Thriemer, Shaali M Ame, George M Mtove, Lorenz von

    Seidlein,Ben Amos, Ilse CE Hendriksen,Abraham Mwambuli,AikandeShoo,Deok R Kim, Leon R Ochiai, Michael Favorov,John D Clemens,Harald

    Wilfing, Jacqueline L Deen,and Said M Ali. Assessment and comparative

    analysis of a rapid diagnostic test (Tubex) for the diagnosis of typhoid fever

    among hospitalized children in rural Tanzania.BMC Infect Dis. 2011; 11: 147.

    14. Lateef A Olopoenia, Aprileona L King. Widal agglutination test - 100 years later:

    still plagued by controversy. Postgrad Med J2000;76:8084.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Narayanappa%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19430063http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Sripathi%20R%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19430063http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Jagdishkumar%20K%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19430063http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Rajani%20HS%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19430063http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19430063http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Ley%20B%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Thriemer%20K%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Ame%20SM%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Mtove%20GM%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=von%20Seidlein%20L%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=von%20Seidlein%20L%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Amos%20B%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Hendriksen%20IC%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Mwambuli%20A%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Shoo%20A%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Shoo%20A%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Kim%20DR%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Ochiai%20LR%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Favorov%20M%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Clemens%20JD%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Clemens%20JD%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Wilfing%20H%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Wilfing%20H%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Deen%20JL%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Ali%20SM%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Narayanappa%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19430063http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Sripathi%20R%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19430063http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Jagdishkumar%20K%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19430063http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Rajani%20HS%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19430063http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19430063http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Ley%20B%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Thriemer%20K%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Ame%20SM%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Mtove%20GM%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=von%20Seidlein%20L%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=von%20Seidlein%20L%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Amos%20B%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Hendriksen%20IC%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Mwambuli%20A%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Shoo%20A%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Shoo%20A%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Kim%20DR%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Ochiai%20LR%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Favorov%20M%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Clemens%20JD%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Wilfing%20H%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Wilfing%20H%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Deen%20JL%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Ali%20SM%5Bauth%5D