synthesis of diazonium n-(perfluoroalkyl
TRANSCRIPT
East Tennessee State UniversityDigital Commons @ East
Tennessee State University
Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works
8-2019
Synthesis of Diazonium N-(Perfluoroalkyl)Benzenesulfonimide Polymers for ProtonExchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs)Helal AlharbiEast Tennessee State University
Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd
Part of the Organic Chemistry Commons
This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. Ithas been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee StateUniversity. For more information, please contact [email protected].
Recommended CitationAlharbi, Helal, "Synthesis of Diazonium N-(Perfluoroalkyl) Benzenesulfonimide Polymers for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells(PEMFCs)" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3601. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3601
Synthesis of Diazonium N-(Perfluoroalkyl) Benzenesulfonimide Polymers for Proton Exchange
Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs)
________________________
A thesis
presented to
the faculty of the Department of Chemistry
East Tennessee State University
In partial fulfilment
of the requirements for the degree
Master of Science in Chemistry
________________________
by
Helal Alharbi
August 2019
________________________
Dr. Hua Mei, Chair
Dr. Abbas G. Shilabin
Dr. Aleksey Vasilie
Keywords: Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), Diazonium, Nafion, Perfluoro(3-
xapent-4-ene) sulfonyl fluoride, Perfluoroalkyl arylsulfonimide (PFSI) polymers
2
ABSTRACT
Synthesis of Diazonium N-(Perfluoroalkyl) Benzenesulfonimide Polymers for Proton Exchange
Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs)
by
Helal Alharbi
The objective of the research is to synthesize the diazonium N-(perfluoroalkyl)
benzenesulfonimide (PFSI) zwitterionic polymers as electrolytes in polymer electrolyte
membrane (PEM) fuel cells. The proposed diazonium PFSI zwitterionic polymer (I) is expected
to enhance the thermal and chemical stability, increase the proton conductivity of electrolytes,
and improve the catalyst efficiency for PEM fuel cells. Synthesis of the perfluorobenzoyl
peroxide initiator, homopolymerization of perfluoro (3-oxapent-4-ene) sulfonyl fluoride,
coupling reaction with 4-sulfamonylacetanilide, coupling reaction with 4-nitrobenzene sulfonyl
amide, n-deacetylation reaction, and diazotization reaction have been carried out successfully in
the lab. The intermediate chemicals are characterized by GC-MS, IR, NMR, and GPC
spectroscopies.
I
3
DEDICATION
I dedicate this research work to God Almighty, my parents, my siblings, and the
department of chemistry at Qassim University.
4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to really thank Dr. Hua Mei for her motivation, guidance and patience
throughout this research work.
Thanks to Dr. Abbas G. Shilabin and Dr. Aleksey Vasiliev for serving as committee
members. Thanks to Dr. Mohseni for his assistance with the instruments.
Special thanks to Dr. Mei’s group for their support and assistance.
Finally, I would like to say a big thank you to the ETSU faculty, staff, and graduate
students of the Chemistry Department for their assistance and support during my time at ETSU.
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. 2
DEDICATION ............................................................................................................................. 3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... 4
LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... 11
LIST OF SCHEMES ................................................................................................................... 12
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................... 13
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 15
Preface .............................................................................................................................. 15
Fuel Cells ......................................................................................................................... 15
Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs) ........................................................ 17
Polymer Electrolyte Membrane ....................................................................................... 21
Proposed MEA System .................................................................................................... 23
The Summary of Previous Work ..................................................................................... 24
Diazonium PFSI Zwitterions Polymers ........................................................................... 25
6
Target Polymer ................................................................................................................. 27
4-Sulfamonylacetanilide Starting Material (Approach 1) ................................................ 28
4-Nitrobenzenesulfonyl Amide Starting Material (Approach 2) ..................................... 30
2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .............................................................................................. 32
Prepare the Initiator ................................................................................................................... 32
Ammonolysis Reaction .................................................................................................... 34
Polymerization Reaction .................................................................................................. 35
Coupling Reaction ........................................................................................................... 36
Reduction Reaction .......................................................................................................... 41
N-deacetylation Reaction ................................................................................................. 43
Diazotization Reaction ..................................................................................................... 46
3. EXPERIMENTAL ................................................................................................................... 49
General Considerations .................................................................................................... 49
NMR Spectroscopy ......................................................................................................... 49
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer ....................................................................... 49
Infrared Spectroscopy ...................................................................................................... 49
7
Glass Vacuum System ..................................................................................................... 50
Purification of Solvents and Experimental Practice ........................................................ 50
Synthesis of the Initiator, Perfluorobenzoyl Peroxide ..................................................... 51
Synthesis of 4-sulfamonylacetanilide ............................................................................... 52
Synthesis of 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl amid ........................................................................ 52
Synthesis of FSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n .................................................................................... 53
Synthesis of 4-NO2PhSO2NHSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n ......................................................... 54
Synthesis of CH3CONHPhSO2NHSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n ............................................. 55
Synthesis of 4-NH2PhSO2NHSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n .................................................... 56
Synthesis of 4- N2+ PhSO2N-SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n ................................................... 57
4. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 59
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 61
APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................. 67
APPENDIX A1: GC-MS Chromatogram of 4-sulfamonylacetanilide, (4a) ................... 67
APPENDIX A2: GC-MS Chromatogram of 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl amide, (4b) .......... 68
APPENDIX A3: The Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) data for
8
FSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (6) ........................................................................................... 69
APPENDIX A4: The Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) data for
CH3CONHPhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (7a) ............................................. 69
APPENDIX A5: The Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) data for
4-NH2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (8a) ..................................................... 70
APPENDIX A6: The Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) data for
4-N2+PhSO2N-SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (9a) ...................................................... 71
APPENDIX A7: 19FNMR spectrum of perfluorobenzoyl peroxide, (2), 400MHZ,
CDCl3 ............................................................................................................................. 72
APPENDIX B1: 19FNMR spectrum of FSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (6), 400MHZ,
CD3CN ................................................................................................................ 73
APPENDIX B2: 19FNMR spectrum of 4-NO2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (7b),
400MHZ, CD3CN ............................................................................................... 74
APPENDIX B3: 19FNMR spectrum of CH3CONHPhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n,
(7a), 400MHZ, CD3CN ....................................................................................... 75
9
APPENDIX B4: 19FNMR spectrum of 4-NH2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (8a),
400MHZ, CD3CN ............................................................................................... 76
APPENDIX B5: 19FNMR spectrum of 4- N2+ PhSO2N-SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (9a),
400MHZ, CD3CN ............................................................................................... 77
Appendix C1: 1HNMR spectrum of 4-sulfamonylacetanilide, (4a), 400MHZ,CD3CN ..78
Appendix C2: 1HNMR spectrum of 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl amide, (4b), 400MHZ,
CD3CN ................................................................................................................ 79
Appendix C3: 1HNMR spectrum of 4-NO2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n,
(7b),400MHZ, CD3CN ........................................................................................ 80
Appendix C4: Expanded 1H NMR spectrum of 4NO2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n,
(7b),400MHZ, CD3CN .......................................................................................... 81
Appendix C5: 1HNMR spectrum of CH3CONHPhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (7a),
400MHZ, CD3CN ................................................................................................ 82
Appendix C6: 1HNMR spectrum of 4-NH2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (8a),
400MHZ, CD3CN ................................................................................................ 83
10
Appendix C7: Expanded 1H NMR spectrum of 4-
NH2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (8a), 400MHZ, CD3CN ....................... 84
Appendix C8: 1H NMR spectrum of 4- N2+ PhSO2N-SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (9a),
400MHZ, CD3CN ................................................................................................ 85
APPENDIX D1: FT-IR Spectrum of perfluorobenzoyl peroxide, (2) ............................. 86
APPENDIX D2: FT-IR Spectrum of 4-sulfamonylacetanilide, (4a) ............................... 87
APPENDIX D3: FT-IR Spectrum of 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl amide, (4b) ................... 88
APPENDIX D4: FT-IR Spectrum of FSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (6) ................................ 89
APPENDIX D5: FT-IR Spectrum of CH3CONHPhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n,
(7a) ....................................................................................................................... 90
APPENDIX D6: FT-IR Spectrum of 4-NO2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n,(7b) ..91
APPENDIX D7: FT-IR Spectrum of 4-NH2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n,(8a) ..92
APPENDIX D8: FT-IR Spectrum of 4- N2+ PhSO2N-SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (9a) ...93
VITA ............................................................................................................................................ 94
11
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1. The PEMFC structure ...................................................................................................... 19
2. The extended cathode of the MEA structure ................................................................... 20
3. The structure of a traditional dense MEA in PEMFCs .................................................... 21
4. The chemical structure of the of Nafion® polymer ......................................................... 22
5. Proposed new MEA system ............................................................................................. 24
6. Diazonium PFSI monomers ............................................................................................ 24
7. The structure of diazonium PFSI Polymer ....................................................................... 26
8. Grafting of functionalized diazonium zwitterion on a carbon electrode ......................... 26
9. The overall synthesis scheme of the target polymer (Approach 1) ................................. 29
10. The overall synthesis scheme of the target polymer (Approach 2) ................................. 31
11. The possible hydrolysis byproduct from coupling reaction ............................................. 40
12. The possible protonation of diazonium salts (9a) ............................................................ 48
13. The diagram of a dual-manifolds glass vacuum line. Used with permission .................. 50
12
LIST OF SCHEMES
Scheme Page
1. The reaction taking place in a PEMFC ............................................................................ 18
2. Resonance structure of conjugate base of PSFI compounds ........................................... 27
3. The initiation reaction of perfluorobenzoyl chloride ....................................................... 32
4. The mechanism of the initiation reaction ......................................................................... 33
5. Comparison of the ammonolysis reactions ...................................................................... 34
6. The side byproduct formed during the ammonolysis reaction ......................................... 35
7. The homopolymerization of POPF monomer .................................................................. 36
8. The mechanism of the free radical polymerization of the POPF monomer .................... 37
9. The summary of the two coupling reactions .................................................................... 38
10. Acidification of the Crude Coupling Products ................................................................. 41
11. Reduction of the coupling product (7b) ........................................................................... 42
12. The mechanism of reduction reaction .............................................................................. 42
13. The N-deacetylation reaction of the coupled product ...................................................... 43
14. The mechanism of the N-deacetylation catalyzed by a strong acid ................................. 45
15. Diazotization of Primary Aromatic Amines mechanism ................................................. 46
16. : The summary of two diazotization reactions ................................................................. 47
13
LIST OF ABBREVATIONS
POPF Perfluoro (3-Oxapent-4-ene) Sulfonyl Fluoride
AFC Alkaline Fuel Cell
DMFC Direct Methanol Fuel Cell
PEMFC Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell
PAFC Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell
MCFC Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell
SOFC Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
EW Equivalent weight
FTIR Fourier Transform Infra Red
GDL Gas Diffusion Layer
Hz Hertz
MEA Membrane Electrode Assembly
NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
PFSA Perflurosulfonic acid
PFSI Perflurosulfonylimide
14
ppm Parts per million
PTFE Polytetrafluorethylene
TMS Tetramethylsilane
GE General Electric Company
MHQ N-methyl-6-hydroxyquinolinium
CL Catalyst Layer
GFC Gas Flow Channel
TLC Thin Layer Chromatography
DIEA N, N-Diisopropylethylamine
TEA Triethylamine
TPB Triple-Phase Boundary
GCMS Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer
15
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Preface
This research provides the synthesis of a novel diazonium N-(perfluoroalkyl)
benzenesulfonimide (PFSI) polymer, which is proposed to replace the traditional
perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) polymers as the electrolytes in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel
cell (PEMFC). The introduction begins with a brief narrative of fuel cells; after which, the
structure of PEMFCs are explained. Next, details about the structure and classification of
polymer electrolyte membrane, chemical structure and properties of PFSA polymers as
membrane are discussed. And then, the proposed MEA system is elucidated. At last, the reasons
of preparing the targeting polymer and its synthetic routes are illustrated.
Fuel Cells
By definition, fuel cells refer to electrochemical devices that efficiently transform the
chemical energy of the reactants into heat and electricity.1 Measurements show that the
effectiveness of fuel cells ranges between 60 and 80%. Such figures are heavily dependent on the
applications. Compare to the fossil fuels, there is a reduction of the main pollutants by 90% or
more in internal combustion motors.2-4 If there is a steady supply of the necessary fuel, the fuel
cells do not require a recharge. Generally, a typical fuel cell is composed two electrodes that
permeable to clean energy sources, and in between the electrodes lies the electrolyte. To
accelerate the reaction, the catalysts like palladium and platinum are used. It is worth noting that
fuel cells are used in numerous areas such as stationary combined power, transportation, as well
as the supply of heat to portable machines.3-4 Many different types of fuel cells have been
developed in the past few years.
16
In Table 1 below, fuel cells have been classified on the basis of the electrolyte used,
which is dependent on the electrochemical reaction’s nature, used fuel, operating temperature,
and used oxidant.
Table 1: Types of Fuel Cells5
Fuel Cells Electrolytes Temperature Used Fuel Used Oxidant
Proton Exchange
Membrane Fuel
Cell (PEMFC)
H+ conducting
membrane
~80oC
Hydrogen
Air, O2
Alkaline Fuel
Cell (AFC)
KOH ~100oC Hydrogen O2
Direct Methanol
Fuel Cell
(DMFC)
H+ conducting
membrane
80-130oC
CH3OH
Air, O2
Phosphoric Acid
Fuel Cell
(PAFC)
Concentrated
H3PO4
~200oC
Natural gas, H2
Air, O2
Molten
Carbonate Fuel
Cell (MCFC)
Molten K2CO3
~650oC
Natural gas, H2
Air, O2
17
Solid Oxide Fuel
Cell (SOFC)
ZrO2 800-1000oC Natural gas, H2
Air, O2
On the basis of their operating temperatures, fuel cells are classified into two major
categories: high temperature such as Carbonate Fuel Cell (CFC) and Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
(SOFC) and low temperature for example Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC),
Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell (PAFC), and Alkaline Fuel Cell (AFC). Compared to the widely
developed DMFCs, the hydrogen gas is used as fuel in PEM fuel cells while DMFCs are used
methanol as fuel. The PEM fuel cells are generated only water as a byproduct; thus, they are
more environmentally friendly in comparison to DMFCs, which emit carbon dioxide (CO2). The
PEMFCs have numerous benefits over the DMFCs such as better electrical efficiency, clean
operation. While DMFCs has a high proportion of methanol-crossover, which is a significant
hurdle as it reduces fuel efficiency, and hence the performance of the cells.
Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
In 1839, Sir William Robert Grove invented the PEMFC. However, it was only in the
1950s, that General Electric Company (GE) started the development of PEMFCs’.6 Before the
late 1960s, PEMFCs’ did not have any practical applications until they were used as a source of
power for the Gemini space mission. The PEMFC technology obtained the massive interest in
the 1970s when the Nafion membrane was first used.7 Besides portable power, stationary power,
and distributed stationary power generation applications, PEMFCs are also proposed to be used
in transportation as they are eco-friendly. The advantages of PEMFCs include their effective
operation at high current density, relatively low operation temperature, quick startup, and a long
stack life.8
18
The overall reaction taking place in PEMFCs is a reversible oxidation-reduction reaction.
On the cathode, the oxygen gas, oxidant, is channeled to the gas flow channel (GFC).9 While
hydrogen fuel is channeled to the anode (GFC) through field flow plates on the other side of the
cell. Hydrogen and oxygen are then transported via the gas diffusion layers (GDL) to the catalyst
layers (CLs) separately. The hydrogen gas in the anode is oxidized to electrons and protons
whereby the protons migrate via the proton-conducting polymer membrane to the cathode’s CL.
The electrons generated from the anode catalyst layers are then transported through the external
circuit to the cathode current collector. The electrons combining with the protons at the cathode
reduce oxygen to produce water. The membrane is electrically non-conducting, thus inhibiting
the passage of electrons. Besides, water formed in this reaction is expelled out of the cathode CL
via the GDL and ultimately out of the cathode GFC. The reactions taking place in a PEMFC are
shown in the Scheme 1 below.
Numerous factors impact the performance of PEMFCs. Such include the high
temperature that boosts its operation by enhancing the membrane’s proton conductivity.
However, external heat is not a requisite as exothermic reactions take place in PEMFCs; hence
the utilization of a water-cooling system is required to expel excess heat.10 In addition, PEMFCs
performance deteriorates when the membrane is contaminated with CO and CO2 and when
electrodes are tainted. In this regard, a source of relatively pure hydrogen is preferable for
fuel.11,12,13
Anode: 2H2 → 4H+ + 4e- ………………………………1
Cathode: O2 + 4H+ + 4e- → 2H2O …………………….2
Overall reaction: 2H2 + O2 → 2H2O …………………...3
Scheme 1: The reaction taking place in a PEMFC
19
Figure 1: The PEMFC structure. Used with permission14
A typical PEMFC possesses three principal components, which include two bipolar-
separate or flow field-plates, and the membrane electrode assembly (MEA). The MEA consists
of two GDLs, two dispersed CLs, and a membrane that permits the protons to move between the
electrodes for the reactions to take place. The MEA plays a primary role in controlling the cell’s
performance.
The cathode section of the MEA which comprise the electrolyte membrane and the
carbon electrodes as shown in Figure 2. The electrochemical reaction in the cell takes place at
the triple-phase boundary (TPB), where the protons, the electrons, and the reactant gases meet in
the MEA.
In general, the requirements of the proton exchange membrane comprise low electric
conductivity, high proton conductivity, low gas permeability, good mechanical properties, as
well as chemical stability.15,16
20
Figure 2: The extended cathode of the MEA structure.18 Used with permission
On both sides, the CLs are directly adjacent to the membrane. Because the half-cell
reactions occur in these layers, the CLs are also referred as the active layers. Since all the
reactants, gases, protons and electrons have to meet the catalyst in the CLs, keeping the balance
of hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties in the layer is very important. The polymer electrolyte
membrane is hydrophilic for transferring the protons, while the carbon electrode is hydrophilic
for allowing gases and electrons passing through. 17 Too hydrophilic with water accumulation at
the cathode side can cause the swelling of the CLs, which will eventually result in the failing of
the cell. On the other side, the CLs will decrease gasses transport if they are too hydrophilic.
Hence, the balance between the hydrophilic fluorinated polymer and hydrophobic carbon powder
is needed for the CL to provide the excellent performance of the PEMFC.
The CLs are generally fabricated by physically mixing the membrane with the catalyst
and smearing the paste to the GDL. Thompson et al. asserted that, in such electrodes, up to 50%
21
of the catalyst particles onto carbon may be inactive.18 Since the platinum alloys catalyst is very
expensive, how to efficiently use catalyst is critical for the widely development and applications
of PEMFCs. In the MEA, the catalyst utilization is determined by two main factors, proton
transport resistance in CLs, and the catalyst activity.19 Thus, the catalyst activity depends on the
surface area of the catalyst particles in contact with the membrane hydrophilic moiety.19
The figure 3 below presents a traditional MEA structure with the catalyst randomly
placed on the dense electrode.
Figure 3: The structure of a traditional dense MEA in PEMFCs.20 Used with permission
The other components of the MEA are the bipolar plates. Their operative functions
involve expediting water management, separating individual cells, distributing oxidants and fuel,
and transporting current away. A more detailed research on modifications and configurations of
MEA components follows below.
Polymer Electrolyte Membrane
It is widely known that for PEMFCs, the most commonly used membranes materials are
the perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) polymers such as Nafion® polymers. 21 The PFSA polymers
contain two fundamental parts namely ion clusters with sulfonic acid ions and a perfluorinated
alkane main chain. With the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) backbone, the PFSA polymers have
22
excellent stability in both reductive and oxidative phases.22 Under full hydrated conditions,
PFSA polymers’ proton conductivity can reach 0.10 S/cm.4 It is essential to hydrate the
membrane to enhances the proton conductivity by facilitating the protons movement.
As one of PFSA polymers, Nafion® is an extensively studied and used polymer
membrane in PEMFCs because of its desirable qualities such as liquid permeability, low gas and
mechanical stability, and good chemical at low temperature.15
As per the illustration figure 4 below, PFSA polymers are commercially accessible in the
sulfonic acid form (-SO3 –H+). Nafion® polymers are formed from copolymerization of
tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and nafion monomer, perfluoro (4-methyl-3, 6-dioxaoct-7-ene)-
sulfonic acid.24
Figure 4: The chemical structure of the of Nafion® polymer 24
In the Nafion polymer, the perfluorinated alkyl backbone, which is responsible for its
excellent thermal and chemical stability, and significant mechanical strength, is fabricated from
copolymerization with TFE. With the perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acid group, The Nafion polymer
has the desirable proton conductivity. For instance, Nafion® 117 has pKa of −6,25,26 which is
equivalent to the super acidity of photoacid, N- methyl-6-hydroxyquinolinium (MHQ) which has
pKa* ≈ -7 in excited-state.31
23
There are also some undesirable features associated with Nafion® polymers as they are
working as the electrolyte. For instance, they like to form large rod-shaped micelles that decrease
the contact with the microporous carbon electrodes. After certain time, the membranes are
washed away, and it will result in the lower ion conductivity and finally diminished performance
of PEMFC. Additionally, the sulfonic acid pendants (-SO3H) in the polymers also are oxidized
into anhydride (-SO2OSO2-) when the temperature is too high. Moreover, in the extremely
oxidizing and acidic conditions, the integration between carbon electrodes and the electrolytes is
weakened.27 Hence, all of mentioned above diminish the PEM fuel cell’s life span.
In addition, other PFSA polymers, are commercially available include, Celtec-P (BASF),
Aciplex® (Asaki Kasei), POPF Gore-Select (Gore), Flemion® (AsahiGlass), and Aquivion®.
Proposed MEA System
To date, the design and fabrication of MEA attract a lot of attention in research area since
these are the most important processes in fuel cell technology development. Among them, one
proposed modifications is to fabricate the thin electrolyte film in the MEA. Another one involves
the placing the catalyst to the membrane as near as possible. According to Yang et al.32, after
using the Pt-C-80 (Pt catalyst content 80wt. %) thin layers to replace the Pt black at the frontiers
between the GDL and electrolyte, the performance of the fuel cell has big improvement. In
addition, the modified 7 and 9- layer MEAs with thinner CLs have been reported to enhance the
performance of PEMFCs.19
We also propose a new MEA system by having the electrolyte chemically grafted onto
the pores of the carbon electrode as indicated in figure 5 below.20 And then the new MEA system
propose to replace the traditional ones. It is believed that the directly attachment of
24
electrolyte/catalyst onto electrode will enhance the catalyst utilization, the membrane proton
conductivity, and stability of PEM fuel cells.
Figure 5: Proposed new MEA system. (modified from Creager 20-used with permission)
The Summary of Previous Work
Analogs of diazonium PFSI monomers are prepared in our lab, and their synthesis
methods are altered with the aim of providing various options for membrane structure variations,
enhanced performance for PEM fuel cells, and excellent chemical and mechanical properties.
Figure 6. Diazonium PFSI monomers
25
Figure 6 describe two groups of diazonium PFSI zwitterionic monomers prepared for the
further polymerization and modification of MEA in PEMFCs. The first three diazonium PFSI
monomers (I-III in Figure 1) were prepared from Nafion® monomer. Monomer III is not
prepared successfully due to the difficulty to purify the intermediates from the coupling reaction
of brominated Nafion monomer and 3-fluoro-4-nitrobenzenesulfonylamide. The other two
diazonium PFSI monomers (IV-V in Figure 1) from POPF -based monomers,
CF2=CFOCF2CF2SO2F (POPF), has been successfully synthesized. POPF polymers are referred
with a shorter perfluoroalkyl chain, which provides a better proton conductivity compared to
Nafion polymers when placed under low humidity proposed by Paddison and Elliott’s
calculation.43
Diazonium PFSI Zwitterion Polymers
In this project, a new diazonium PFSI polymers, from perfluoro (3-oxapent-4-ene)
sulfonyl fluoride monomer, are proposed to be prepared as electrolytes for PEMFCs rather than
the traditional used PFSA polymers. We expect the new electrolyte will dramatically increase the
MEA performance under more intense conditions.
There are three major parts, the aryl diazonium moiety, the perfluoroalkyl (aryl)
sulfonamide pendant, and the perfluoroalkyl backbone, in the targeting polymers. Figure 7 shows
the structure of the expected new diazonium PFSI polymer.
26
Figure 7: The structure of diazonium PFSI polymer
With the diazonium group, the PFSI polymers are anticipated to chemically attach to the
carbon electrode surface as figures 8 indicated.49 The better integration between the electrolytes
and electrode will offer enhanced proton conductivity and thermal stability. The new polymer
will have excellent stability in both reductive and oxidative phases due to the perfluorinated alkyl
backbones in POPF polymers. Moreover, it anticipated providing significant hydrophobicity and
mechanical strength.
Figures 8: Grafting of functionalized diazonium zwitterion on a carbon electrode.37, 39, 40-42
The PFSI pendants can provide good ionic conductivity, more inert to electrochemical
conditions, excellent thermal stability in acidic conditions, less susceptible to dehydration and,
27
oxidative degradation compared to the traditional PFSA polymers.23 The PFSI compounds have a
general chemical formula (RfSO2)2NH. The PFSI compounds were first synthesized in the 1980s.
Later, the establishment of relative gas-phase acidities (GA) for string Bronsted strong acid
series were by Zhang et al. 34-36 It is notable that PFSI compounds have greater acidity compared
to traditional mineral acids such as HNO3.37,38
As one of the bis[(perfluoroalkyl)-sulfonyl)]imide
compounds, (CF3SO2)2NH has a pKa value = 7.8 in acetic acid compare to a pKa value = 10.2 of
HNO3 in the same condition. The super-acidity of PFSI compounds is due to two mains factors.
One factor is because of perfluoroalkyl group, which is a very strong electron-withdrawing
group.26,30,35 Another factor is because the resonance stabilization over the O-S-N skeleton of the
PFSI compounds’ conjugate base, (RfSO2)2N- as shown in Scheme 2.
Scheme 2: Resonance structure of conjugate base of PSFI compounds.33
Target Polymer
The synthesis of the diazonium N-(perfluoroalkyl) benzenesulfonimide (PFSI)
zwitterionic polymers (Figure 1) is prepared from perfluoro (3-oxapent-4-ene) sulfonyl fluoride
(POPF) monomer. Two approaches are planned to synthesize the desired polymer. The only
difference in these two routes in the preparation of PFSI is aromatic amine part. The approach II
is using the reduction of nitro group, and approach I is using the deacetylation method.
28
4-Sulfamonylacetanilide Starting Material (Approach 1)
A six-step procedure is designed to synthesize the desired polymer: 1) synthesis of an
initiator 2) an ammonolysis reaction 3) a homopolymerization 4) a coupling reaction, 5) an N-
deacetylation reaction, and 6) a diazotization reaction. The overall synthesis scheme of the
(Approach 1) for the target polymer is shown in Figure 9.
29
Figure 9: The overall synthesis scheme of the target polymer (Approach 1)
30
4-Nitrobenzenesulfonyl Amide Starting Material (Approach 2)
Another six-step procedure is designed to synthesize the desired polymer with a different
starting material, 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl amide. The second approach includes: 1) synthesis of
an initiator 2) an ammonolysis reaction 3) a homopolymerization 4) a coupling reaction, 5) a
reduction reaction, and 6) a diazotization reaction. The overall synthesis scheme of the
(Approach 2) for the target polymer is shown in Figure 10.
31
Figure 10: The overall synthesis scheme of the target polymer (Approach 2)
32
CHAPTER 2
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Prepare the Initiator
Scheme 3: The preparation of perfluorobenzoyl peroxide.47
Scheme 3 shows the preparation of the polymer initiator: perfluorobenzoyl peroxide. This
reaction can be referred to as nucleophilic acyl substitution reaction and its overall mechanism is
shown in Scheme 4. The 19F-NMR spectrum indicates that the targeting purified product,
perfluorobenzoyl peroxide, was obtained. According to Venzo et al., perfluorobenzoyl peroxide has
three chemical shifts on the 19F-NMR spectrum at -134.26, -143.73 and -158.62 ppm for ortho, para, meta
positions respectively.47 The reaction should carry out at a low temperature, 0 °C because the
peroxide compounds are very reactive. Other side reactions, like the hydrolysis reaction could
have occurred at room temperature. In the recrystallization process, two solvents,
chloroform/methanol (1:2 by volume), was used. The solubility of the perfluorobenzoyl peroxide
is good in the chloroform; therefore, it was used first.47 The percentage yield of product was
around 75-80 %, which is acceptable.
33
Scheme 4: The mechanism of perfluorobenzoyl peroxide preparation.48
34
Ammonolysis Reaction
Scheme 5: The ammonolysis reactions
The synthesis of 4-substituted sulfonyl amide(4a-b) was conducted by refluxing 4-
substituted sulfonyl chloride (3a-3b) in the presence of acetonitrile and excess ammonium
hydroxide at 100 oC. The ratio is 1:2 for sulfonyl chloride reacting with the aqueous ammonia.
The ammonolysis reaction is considered as a typical nucleophilic addition-elimination reaction
as illustrated in Scheme 5, where the Cl- ion is replaced by the NH2- group.58
1H-NMR spectrum indicates that both targeting products, 4-sulfamonylacetanilide (4a)
and 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl amide (4b), were obtained successfully. The percentage yield of
products is around 75%. The purification process and hydrolysis by products contribute to the
percentage yield loss of products. After the ammonolysis reaction was successfully carried out
by replacing NH2- group with Cl- ion, the chemical shift of primary aromatic amine appeared at
5.64 ppm and 5.97 ppm on the 1H-NMR spectrum for 4-sulfamonylacetanilide (4a) and 4-
nitrobenzenesulfonyl amide (4b). The FT-IR Spectrum showed the absorption for the primary
amine around 3300 cm-1 for (4a) and (4b). Furthermore, the molecular weights, 214 g/mol and
202 g/mol, for (4a) and (4b) were shown on GC-MS chromatogram.
35
The excess ammonia was used to neutralize the HCl which formed as a byproduct. The
ammonolysis reaction was more favorable than the hydrolysis reaction because ammonia is a
stronger nucleophile compared to water.57,58 The hydrolysis side product aryl sulfonic
ammonium salt and byproduct NH4Cl can be washed out since both have good solubility in
water.
Scheme 6: The side/by products formed during the ammonolysis reaction
Polymerization Reaction
Homopolymerization of POPF monomer (FSO2CF2CF2OCF=CF2) is used instead of
nafion monomer. Compared to Nafion® polymer, the POPF polymers have some advantages,
36
such as high proton conductivity, great affinity for water, low equivalent weights (EWs), as well
as considerable stability at relatively high temperatures, higher than 80 oC.28
Due to the short side chains of perfluoroalkyl chain, the POPF polymers offer a higher
proton conductivity than Nafion® polymer per the equivalent weight (EW). According to Arcella
et al., a polymer with low EWs are hydrated completely at above 100 oC.28 With low EWs
between 625 and 850 g/eq, the POPF polymer show high ionic conductivity, which is above 0.13
S/cm. Hence, they are preferred alternatives of Nafion® polymers for high temperature
applications of PEMFCs.29
Scheme 7: The homopolymerization of POPF monomer
Scheme 7 indicate to the free radical polymerization of (FSO2CF2CF2OCF=CF2) POPF
monomer and its overall mechanism is indicated in Scheme 8.50 The polymerization conversion
rate of POPF monomer is higher than Nafion® monomer because the shorter perfluoroalkyl
chain. The 19F-NMR spectrum shows that the polymerization reaction has occurred, and the
POPF polymers (6) was obtained with excess monomer and the perfluorobenzoyl peroxide
initiator. The percentage yield of polymer is about 40 %, and it is considered acceptable
compared to literature,44 which is ~30 to 50%. The low conversion rate of free radical
37
polymerization mainly led to reduced yield of polymer. As an addition polymerization, longer
polymerization time can increase the yield of polymer.
Scheme 8: The mechanism of the free radical polymerization of the POPF monomer.50
Linear polymers usually have higher density than branched polymers. The POPF
polymer (6) is expected to be a linear fluoropolymer with pendant since it has density
approximately 3.42 g/mL.62,63,64 The properties of polymer generally determine by molecular
weight and polydispersity index (PDI). Free radical homopolymerization of POPF monomer,
(FSO2CF2CF2OCF=CF2), produces functionally, medium molecular weight (Mw: 45,564)
polymer. The PDI for formed polymer (6) is 2.024. It is water insoluble polymer. The properties
of polymer generally determine by molecular weight and polydispersity index (PDI). Free radical
38
homopolymerization of POPF monomer, (FSO2CF2CF2OCF=CF2), produces functionally,
middle molecular weight (Mw: 45,564) polymer. The PDI for formed polymer (6) is 2.024. It is
water insoluble polymer.
The chemical shift of the sidechain (–SO2F) located at ~ 45 ppm on 19FNMR spectrum.
The two chemical shifts of the sidechain (CF2) appear at -77 and -112 ppm respectively.
According to the fluorine NMR spectra, multiplets at -115, -119, and -138 ppm are assigned to
backbone (CF2-CF-).44
Coupling Reaction
Scheme 9: The summary of the two coupling reactions
As shown in Scheme 9, both the coupling reaction start from the similar reagents and
conditions. There is one difference in the structure of aromatic compounds. For coupling reaction
39
(A), 4-sulfamonylacetanilide, (4a), has amide group at para position while in coupling reaction
(B), 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl amide, (4b), which has nitro group at para position of benzene ring.
The 19F-NMR spectra were used to monitor the reaction process. The disappearance of
fluorine peak in sulfonyl fluoride group from polymer indicate the reactions had completed. Both
coupling reactions were refluxing at 100 oC for around five days under the argon gas protection.
The percentage yield of coupling reaction (A) is higher than coupling reaction (B). Compared to
the nitro substituted aromatic sulfonyl amide (4b), the acetamide substituted aromatic sulfonyl
amide (4a) as the stronger nucleophile favors the nucleophilic addition-elimination reaction. This
is evident from the substituent’s inductive effect on the aromatic ring, the acetamide is a
moderate electron donating group, and the nitro group is a strong electron withdrawing group.57
The synthesis of the coupling products took a long reaction time to achieve the product. This can
be attributed to the fact that the fluorine is not a good leaving group.44
The dry condition is extremely necessary for the coupling reactions.53 The presence of
any small amount of water leads to hydrolysis of the sulfonyl fluoride group (-SO2F) in the
starting polymer (6). The hydrolysis side products are also hard to remove. In addition,
triethylamine, the organic base catalyst, is used to improve the nucleophilicity of aromatic
sulfonyl amides (4a-b). Furthermore, extra amount of the aromatic sulfonyl amides (4a-b), was
used to push the coupling reactions with polymer (6) rather than the hydrolysis reaction.
40
Figure 11: The possible hydrolysis byproduct from coupling reaction
In the coupling reaction (B), the hydrolyzed side products are removed by the extraction
with dichloromethane and water. After the basic crude product is neutralized with 1M HCl. And
then the excess starting material, 4-nitrobenzene sulfonyl amide (4b), can be removed by
vacuum sublimation. On the contrary in the coupling reaction (A), the extraction process did not
work since the product, (7a), has low solubility in dichloromethane.
The sticky coupling product (7a) is because of forming the triethyl ammonium (TEAH+)
counterion. In order to convert TEAH+ salt to amine and TEA, the coupling product is purified
by acidification with concentrated HCl, and solvent extraction with dichloromethane. According
to proton NMR, partially n-deacetylation reaction occurs but TEAH cation stays. The main
reason is that the triethyl ammonium chloride salt is a solid, which has the similar poor solubility
in water and dichloromethane as our organic product. The extraction procedure is not successful
to remove the TEAH+ chloride salt.
According the thin layer chromatography, two different spots were revealed with values
of Rf value of 0.82 for starting material and 0.18 for the coupling product (7a). Thus, the 1:1
ratio of tert-butyl methyl ether to acetone was used to separate the excess starting material (4a)
and through column chromatography. The column chromatography succeeded in separating the
coupling product (7a) from the starting material (4a). The partial deacetylation product is
41
actually obtained as TEAH+ form since the silicon dioxide catalyzed the coupling product and
led to a partially n-deacetylation reaction.
The N, N-diisopropylethylamine (DIEA) is suggested to replace triethyl amine (TEA) as
the base catalyst for the coupling reaction. The N, N-diisopropylethylamine is a slightly weaker
base than trimethylamine. 61 Thus, the DIEAH+ chloride salt may be easier to be removed by
extraction due to its good solubility in water compared to the poor solubility of TEAH+ chloride
salt.
Scheme 10: Acidification of the Crude Coupling Products
Reduction Reaction
To prepare the aromatic amines, the reduction of their corresponding aromatic nitro
compounds is considered a common method. There are different reagents can be used to
reducing the nitro group to amine,51 for example, Fe/HCl or Fe/Acetic Acid, Zn/NaOH, Sn/HCl,
Fe/ArOH, catalytic hydrogenation using Raney Ni, H2-Pd/C and H2-PtO2 sodium polysulfide,
NaBH4/Pt-Ni. The selection of appropriate reagents for reduction depends on reaction
42
conditions, type sensitive functional groups, and water-sensitivity. The reduction of the aromatic
nitro compound, (7b), is shown in Scheme 11.
Scheme 11: Reduction of the coupling product (7b)
The reduction of (8b) was conducted by sonication (7b) for six hours in the presence of
the catalyst, Fe, HCl, and methanol with H2 gas. The ratio is 1:5 for the coupling product (7b)
reacting with the catalyst, iron powder. Higher equivalents of the iron powder are required to
complete reduction. The reaction mechanism of aromatic nitro-compounds is illustrated in
Scheme 12.52
Scheme 12: The mechanism of reduction reaction.52
43
According to previous work in Dr. Mei’s research group,53 the procedure of Fe/HCl/H2 in
ultra-sound sonicator was effective for reducing the aromatic nitro compound to aromatic amine
compound. The 1H-NMR spectrum indicated that the reduction reaction was completed;
however, the purification process failed to separate the final purified product from the extra
inorganic catalyst and by products. The possible reason is that the reduction product (8b) was
adherent to the surface of the inorganic catalyst/byproduct. The procedure of Fe/HCl/H2 in ultra-
sound sonicator was effective for reducing the aromatic nitro compound to aromatic amine
compound but the purification process was not feasible.
N-deacetylation Reaction
N-deacetylation can be referred to as amide hydrolysis or nucleophilic acyl substitution
reaction.4,59 The reaction was achieved by the use of high temperatures, strong acids or bases
catalyst since the low reactivity of aromatic sulfonamide.58 It went through the nucleophilic
addition- elimination mechanism. The N-deacetylation reaction of the coupling product, (7a), is
shown in Scheme 13.
Scheme 13: The N-deacetylation reaction of the coupled product
The N-deacetylation reaction was carried out successfully after sonication with
concentrated hydrochloric acid for 24 hours. The percent yield of the purified product for this
reaction was 53.3 %. The purification process involves neutralization, filtration, solid-liquid
44
extraction, and vacuum sublimation. The filtration was used to get rid of the inorganic part
(NaCl). The hydrolyzed side product from coupling reaction was removed after solid-liquid
extraction. Neutralization and vacuum sublimation process were used to remove excess of
starting material, (4a) in the coupling reaction as well. The final N-deacetylation product (8a)
was contaminated with TEAH cation according to proton NMR. The reason is that TEAH cation
and the final product (8a) has poor solubility in water and solid-liquid extraction was helpful
only to remove the hydrolysis by-product.
After the N-deacetylation reaction was successfully carried out by converting the amide
group to the primary amine, the chemical shift of amide group at 9.02 ppm disappear in
compared to the appearance of the chemical shift of primary amine at 5.43 ppm the proton NMR
spectra. Also, two new chemical shifts for the benzene ring appeared at 7.56 ppm and 6.67 ppm.
Moreover, the FT-IR Spectrum showed the absorption for the primary amine around 3400 cm-1.
The N-deacetylation reactions occur readily in acidic conditions such as HCl (pKa = -
6.0), H2SO4 (pKa = -9.0) and ClSO3H (pKa = -6.6) under sonication or refluxing according to
literature.54 The mechanism in acidic condition is as shown in Scheme 14.36
The protonation of the carbonyl group (C=O) in amide (A) makes the carbon more
electrophilic and susceptible to the weak nucleophilic attack first in step ii. And then the acid can
protonate the secondary amine to ammonia salt, which is a better leaving group in step v.
45
Scheme 14: The mechanism of the N-deacetylation catalyzed by a strong acid.36
The N-deacetylation of the PFSI aromatic acetamide in Scheme 13 is very effective to
synthesize the PFSI aromatic amine compared to the reduction of the nitro substituted aromatic
amide in Scheme 11. This strong electron withdrawing perfluoroalkyl backbone can destabilize
the acetamide, which will be more reactive toward the nucleophile in the N-deacetylation.
46
Diazotization Reaction
The diazotization reactions are utilized in the synthesis of diazonium salts from primary
or aromatic amines by using nitrous acid. The mechanism for the diazotization reaction is as
shown in Scheme 15.55 The reactions are usually conducted in organic solvents or aqueous
media.56 Excess amount of acid is normally used to avoid partial diazotization.
Scheme 15: Diazotization of Primary Aromatic Amines mechanism. 55
Two diazotization reagents were tried to obtain diazonium salts (9a) as shown in Scheme
16.
47
Scheme 16: The summary of two diazotization reactions
For the reaction (A), conc. HCl was first attempted but failed due to the low solubility of
starting material (8a). Thus, conc. H2SO4 was utilized to complete the reaction. With dielectric
constant around 100, H2SO4 is considered a very polar liquid.33 The reaction (A) was
successfully carried out according to 19F-NMR and 1H-NMR spectrums. The purification process
includes vacuum filtration after poured into ice and drying under vacuum line. However,
removing the excess of H2SO4 is troublesome. Other further purification methods, such as
extraction from water and drying, were also tried but failed. The reaction (A) was repeated but
48
with smaller amount of H2SO4 (3mL rather than 10mL) and stirring for longer time (5 hrs rather
than 2 hrs).
After purification, the 1H-NMR, 19F-NMR, and IR spectra showed the possibility that the
final purified product (9a) was obtained and contaminated with TEAH cation. However,
according to the GPC, the diazonium salt (9a) has a very low molecular weight (Mw: 2331). The
possible reason for unreasonable molecular weight is that the majority of polymer may be lost
during purification. According to the proton NMR, the possible product after the diazotization is
shown in figure 9. The polymer is not a zwitterion as we designed.
Figure 12: The possible protonation of diazonium salts (9a)
Another procedure, reaction (B), was proposed to prepare the diazonium salt (9a) by the
treatment of N-deacetylation product (8a) with isoamyl nitrite in the presence of HCl gas. In
reaction (B), organic diazotization agent, isoamyl nitrite, is used rather than inorganic NaNO2.
Generally, the procedure of reaction (B) is very simple because both isoamyl nitrite and HCl gas
are easily removed after reaction. 46 According to 1H-NMR and GPC results, the stable polymer
zwitterionic product is not obtained. Therefore, the procedure (B) will be attempted again with
different conditions and amount of organic reagents in order to obtain the diazonium salt (9a)
with resorbable data, especially the GPC data.
49
CHAPTER 3
EXPERIMENTAL
General Consideration
NMR Spectroscopy
1H and 19F, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra, were measured by using a Joel
JNM-ECP-ECP 400-MHz FT NMR spectrometer. The chemical shifts were observed regarding
parts per million (ppm) using high-frequency position conversion; the coupling constants are
stated as J value in Hertz (Hz). The standardized reference material used for the 1H NMR spectra
was the tetramethylsilane (TMS) while for the 19F NMR was trichlorofluoromethane (CFCl3)
external standards. The residue H in CD3CN, was found to be 1.97 ppm concerning TMS.
The splitting patterns of resonance were arranged as singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), the
quartet (q), and multiplet (m). A solution is having a concentration of 1–2 mmol/L was used to
measure the NMR spectra. Similarly, a small volume of CFCl3 gas was used only in 19F NMR.
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer
The Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010 Plus GC was used to record the gas chromatography-
mass (GC-MS) spectroscopy. The samples was prepared by dissolving around 1 mg of sample in
1 mL of acetone.
Infrared Spectroscopy
The infrared spectra were recorded with Shimadzu IR Prestige-21FIR. Then the fine
powder sample was put on the lens of the attenuated total internal reflectance accessory. The
infrared (IR) spectra was scanned from 4000 cm-1 to 450 cm-1, and the quotation of
wavenumbers (cm-1) to intensity abbreviations was strong (s), very strong (vs), and medium (m).
Others include weak (w) and very weak (vw).
50
Glass Vacuum System
Several purification processes such as reduced pressure distillation, sublimation, and
drying were carried out using a glass vacuum line as shown in Figure 13. The vacuum line was
equipped with Teflon® glass-Teflon valves and it consisted of two manifolds. Among them, one
manifold for vacuum line and another one is for purging the nitrogen/argon gas. It contains a
built-in separation system, a liquid nitrogen trap, a diffusion pump and a mechanical Welch
vacuum pump. In essence, an excellent dynamic vacuum is believed to be between 10-4 - 10-7
torr.
Figure 13: The diagram of a dual-manifolds glass vacuum line. Used with permission.60
Purification of Solvents and Experimental Practice
The starting materials: perfluorobenzoyl chloride, N-acetyl sulfanilyl chloride, and
perfluoro(3-oxapent-4-ene) sulfonyl fluoride monomer (C4F8 S O3) were all bought from
commercial sources and were used as stated by the manufacturer unless advised otherwise. All
the reactions were carried out in glassware unless specified otherwise. The compounds that
readily react with the air or moisture were kept in a special dry box under nitrogen gas
protection. Activated molecule sieve was used to dry the solvents.
51
Synthesis of the Initiator, Perfluorobenzoyl Peroxide
In a typical procedure, the mixture of hydrogen peroxide (1.50 mL, 63.94 mmol) and 4 M
of sodium hydroxide (0.31 mL, 1.24 mmol) was added into a 25-mL round-bottom flask with a
stir bar first. In an ice bath, perfluorobenzoyl chloride (0.50 g, 2.17 mmol) was then added
dropwise over approximately 10 minutes by using a dropping funnel. While the solution was
allowed to stir at 0°C, another 1 mL of 4 M of sodium hydroxide was added until the pH reached
eleven. After that, the solution was allowed to stir another one hour at 0 °C. The crude product
was got as a white precipitate, and then the white precipitate was filtered. Next, the crude product
was recrystallized from chloroform/methanol mixture (1:2 by volume). In an ice bath, the crude
product was dissolved in 1.5 mL of chloroform, and 3 mL of methanol was then added. The 0.385
grams of purified perfluorobenzoyl peroxide was obtained after filtration. The percentage yield is
77.4 %.
19F NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3; ppm): δa -134.26 (2F, d), δb -143.73 (1F, t), δc -158.62 (2F, d).
Melting Point: 76-78 °C
IR (νmax/cm-1): 1786.08 m (C=O), 1056.99 m (C-O), 1651.07m (Ar), 1157.29 m, (Ar-F), and
991.41 vs, 906.54 m, and 802.39 vs (C-F).
52
Synthesis of 4-sulfamonylacetanilide
In a typical procedure, N-acetyl sulfanilyl chloride (5.0 g, 21.4 mmol) was dissolved in
30 mL of ammonia hydroxide (28-30%) and 20 mL of acetonitrile in a 100 mL round bottom
flask. The solution was refluxed for 24 hours at 100 oC and the solvent was removed by the
rotary evaporator. The solid crude product was washed by water and then vacuum filtered. The
pure product was obtained with a yield of 72.3 %.
1H NMR (400 MHz; CD3CN; ppm): δA 2.10 (3H, s), δB 8.71 (1H, s), δC 7.78 (2H, d), δD 7.74
(2H, d), JCD = 8 Hz, and δE 5.64 (2H, s).
IR (νmax/cm-1): 3367.71 m (NH), 3290.56 m, 3205.69, and 1593.20 m (NH2), 1654.92 m
(C=O), and 1315.45 s and 1153.43 vs (S=O).
MS (M+, 100%), 214, 172, 156, 108, 92, and 65
Synthesis of 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl amide
In a typical procedure, 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl chloride (5.0 g, 22.6 mmol) was dissolved
in 30 mL of ammonia hydroxide (28-30%) and 20 mL of acetonitrile in a 100 mL round bottom
flask. The solution was refluxed for 24 hours at 100 oC and the solvent was removed by the
53
rotary evaporator. The solid crude product was washed by water and then vacuum filtered. The
pure product was obtained with a yield of 78.4 %.
1H NMR (400 MHz; CD3CN; ppm): δA 8.37 (2H, d), δB 8.11 (2H, d), JAB = 8 Hz, and δC 5.97
(1H, s).
IR (νmax/cm-1): 3332.99 w and 1612.49 w (NH), 1566.20 (C=C), 1516.05 m and 1346.31 s
(NO), and 1311.59 m and 1161.15 s (S=O).
MS (M+, 100%), 202, 156, 138, 122, 92, and 75
Synthesis of FSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n
In a typical procedure, perfluoro (3-oxapent-4-ene) sulfonyl fluoride (5.0 g, 17.9 mmol)
was placed in a Parr stainless steel reactor equipped with a stir bar. Perfluorobenzoyl peroxide
(0.1 g, 0.44 mmol, 2% weight of the monomer) was then added, and the reactor was pressurized
to 150–160 psi (1000– 1100 kPa) with argon gas and heated to 100°C for 5 days. Excess
monomer was then removed by distillation in a Kugelrohr apparatus under vacuum at 145 °C.
2.0 grams product was obtained, and the percentage yield of polymer is about 40.6 %.
54
19F NMR (400 MHz; CD3CN; ppm): δa -112.32 (2F, m), δb -77.52 (2F, m), δc -138.19 (1F, m),
δd and δe -115.82 and -118.43 (2F, d), and δf 45.82 (1F, s).
IR (νmax/cm-1): 1188.15 vs (S=O), 1138.00 vs (CF2), and 987.55 m (C-F).
GPC (logM / RT): Mw: 45,564, and Polydispersity index (Mw/Mn): 2.024
Synthesis of 4-NO2PhSO2NHSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n
In a typical procedure, in the glove box, 1.40 g (around 5.35 mmol) of poly
fluorosulphonyl-tetrafluoroethyl trifluorovinyl ether and 1.10 g (5.44 mmol) of 4-nitrobenzene
sulfonyl amide were added to in a 100-ml round bottom flask equipped with a rubber septum.
And then, 15 mL of dry acetonitrile and 1 ml of trimethylamine were added to the flask. With the
argon gas protection, the solution was refluxed at 100 oC for five days. After that, rotary
evaporator was used to remove solvents. The sticky product was dissolved in 50 mL of acetone,
and then the solution was acidified with 5 mL of 1M HCl until the pH reached two. The rotary
evaporator was used to remove acetone after acidification. Then the sticky product was then
extracted with dichloromethane (3 X 25 mL) and washed with water (3 X 25 mL). The product
was obtained after removing the solvent and drying over the night. And then the product was
sublimated at 145 oC overnight. The percent yield of 67.6 % was obtained.
55
M= TEAH+
1H NMR (400 MHz; CD3CN; ppm): δA 8.28 (2H, d), δB 8.06 (2H, d), ), and JAB = 8 Hz.
19F NMR (400 MHz; CD3CN; ppm): δa -113.67 (2F, m), δb -77.39 (2F, m), δc -137.56 (1F, m),
δd and δe -116.67 and -118.68 (2F, d).
IR (νmax/cm-1): 1527.62 m and 1350.17 m (NO), 1284.59 m, 1157.29 vs and 1091.17 s (S=O),
and 1049.28 s and 1141.86 vs (CF2).
Synthesis of CH3CONHPhSO2NHSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2) n
In a typical procedure, in the glove box, 2.81 g (around 10.0 mmol) of poly
perfluorosulfonyl-tetrafluoroethyl trifluorovinyl ether and 2.14 g (10.03 mmol) of
benzenesulfonyl amide were added to in a 100-ml round bottom flask equipped with a rubber
septum. And then, 42 mL of dry acetonitrile and 3 ml of trimethylamine were added to the flask.
With the argon gas protection, the solution was refluxed at 100 oC for five days. The rotary
evaporator was then used to remove solvents. The sticky product was dissolved in 20 mL of
acetone, and then the solution was acidified with 3 mL of 6M HCl until the pH reached two.
After removing the solvent, the crude product was washed by concentrated HCl. Next, the
product was run through a chromatography column by using a 1:1 ratio of tert-butyl methyl ether
to acetone to remove the excess starting material (4a), Rf value of 0.82 on the TLC plate. The
56
purified product was obtained after removing the solvent and drying over the night. The percent
yield of 70.6 % was obtained.
M= TEAH+
1H NMR (400 MHz; CD3CN; ppm): δA 2.09 (3H, s), δB 9.02 (1H, s), δC 7.78 (2H, d), δD 7.73
(2H, d), and JCD = 8 Hz.
19F NMR (400 MHz; CD3CN; ppm): δa -111.13 (2F, m), δb -76.61 (2F, m), δc -138.67 (1F, m),
δd and δe -116 and -119 (2F, d).
IR (νmax/cm-1): 3283.84 (NH), 1654.92 m (C=O), 1593.20 m (C=C), 1315.45 m, 1242.16 m,
and 1153.43 vs (S=O), and 1045.42 s (CF2).
GPC (logM / RT): Mw: 47,076, and Polydispersity index (Mw/Mn): 1.881
Synthesis of 4-NH2PhSO2NHSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2) n
In a typical procedure, the coupled product (1.2 g, 1.30 mmol) was added into a 100 mL
round bottom. Then 25 mL of methanol and 14 mL of concentrated acid were added to it till it is
acidic. The solution was allowed to react under the sonication overnight. The solution was then
neutralized with 6.0M of NaOH solution. Next, the solid liquid extraction was then carried out
by using acetone as a solvent. The impurities were removed by vacuum sublimation at 125 oC
overnight. The purified product (53.3 %) was obtained.
57
M= TEAH+
1H NMR (400 MHz; CD3CN; ppm): δA 5.43 (2H, s), δB 7.56 (2H, d), δC 6.70 (2H, d), and JBC = 8
Hz.
19F NMR (400 MHz; CD3CN; ppm): δa -113.67 (2F, m), δb -77.31 (2F, m), δc -137.78 (1F, m),
δd and δe -116.67 and -118.68 (2F, m).
IR (νmax/cm-1): 3475.73 w, and 1627.92 m(NH), 3379.29 w and 3244.27 w (NH2), 1597.06
(C=C), 1365.60 w, 1257.59 s, and 1149.57 vs (S=O), and 1056.42 s (CF2). GPC (logM / RT):
Mw: 56,920, and Polydispersity index (Mw/Mn): 1.97
Synthesis of 4-N2+ PhSO2N-SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n
In a typical procedure, 0.240 g (1.40 mmol) of N-deacetylation product, 0.250 g (3.63
mmol) of NaNO2, and 3 mL of concentrated H2SO4 were added to a 25 mL round bottom flask
equipped with a stir bar. The solution was stirred for 5 hours in an ice bath and then poured onto
ice. The purified product was obtained after vacuum filtration and drying over the night. The
percent yield of 60.7 % was obtained.
58
1H NMR (400 MHz; CD3CN; ppm): δA 8.62 (2H, d), and δB 8.25 (2H, d), and JAB = 8 Hz.
19F NMR (400 MHz; CD3CN; ppm): δa -111.49 (2F, m), δb -77.24 (2F, m), δc -136.36 (1F, m),
δd and δe -116.69 and -118.34 (2F, m).
IR (νmax/cm-1): 2357.01 w (N≡N), 1292.31 m, and 1176.58 s (S=O), 1415.75 m and 1134.14
vs, and 1037.70 s (CF2). GPC (logM / RT): Mw: 2331, and Polydispersity index (Mw/Mn): 1.13
59
CHAPTER 4
CONCLUSION
One new diazonium N-(perfluoroalkyl) benzenesulfonimide (PFSI) polymer, from
perfluoro (3-oxapent-4-ene) sulfonyl fluoride monomer, is first prepared with overall 60.7 %
yield. Spectroscopic techniques, including GC-MS, IR, NMR, and GPC are used for
characterization of all the intermediates and the final product. Two synthetic routes were tried to
and one of them succeeded in preparing the target polymer.
The perfluorobenzoyl peroxide initiator was easily prepared. The homopolymerization of
FSO2CF2CF2OCF=CF2 was successful with relatively low yield because of the low conversion
rate of free radical polymerization.
For the para substituted benzenesulfonychlorides, the ammonolysis reactions are also
very easy to carry out with reasonable good yield. The next coupling reactions were completed
successfully in extreme dry condition to reduce the hydrolysis byproduct. The excess starting
material para substituted benzenesulfonyl amide, (4b), was removed by vacuum sublimation. For
another coupling reaction (A) from 4-sulfamonylacetanilide, (4a), the excess 4a was removed
through column chromatography. The yield of coupling products was around 70%. Due to the
difficulty to remove the TEAH+, DIEA is proposed to replace the TEA as the organic base
catalyst.
The purification of the next reduction product was unsuccessful due to the big amount
iron powder used. N-deacetylation reaction is comparable facile to carry out and obtain the
purified PFSI aromatic amine product. The percent yield of the N-deacetylation product was
around 50 %.
60
Two groups of diazotization reagents, include inorganic sodium nitrate with HCl or
concentrated sulfuric acid and isoamyl nitrate with HCl gas, were attempted to conducted
diazotization reaction. Till now, the concentrated H2SO4 with NaNO2 was effective to obtain
diazonium salts. The yield of the final purified product was around 60. Another diazotization
with organic diazotization regents was not completed and will be tried again in the near future.
61
REFERENCES
[1] Spiegel, C. Designing and building fuel cells; McGraw-Hill, Two Penn Plaza, New
York, 2007; pp 3.
[2] Papageorgopoulos D. DOE fuel cell technology program overview and introduction to
the 2010 fuel cell pre-solicitation workshop in DOE fuel cell pre-solicitation workshop.
Department of Energy, Lakewood, Colorado; 2010.
[3] [Barbir F. PEM Fuel Cells: Theory and Practice. 1 st ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: New
York, 2005
[4] Devanathan R. Recent developments in proton exchange membranes for fuel cells.
Energy Environ Sci 2008; 1:101–19.
[5] Hickner, M.; Ghassemi, H.; Kim, Y.S.; Einsla, B.; McGrath, J.E. Alternative Polymer
Systems for Proton Exchange Membranes (PEMs). Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4587- 4612.
[6] Wand, G. Fuel cell history, Part One. www.ogniwa-paliwowe.info, 2006.
[7] Wang, Y.; Chen, K.S.; Mishler, J.: Cho, S.C.; Adroher, X.C. A review of polymer
electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Technology, applications, and needs on fundamental
research (2011). US DOE Publications. Paper 132.
[8] Hua, Mei, Perfluoroalkyl (Aryl) Sulfonimide Zwitterions. Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
University, Clemson, SC, 2006.
[9] Walter, Katie. The unitized regenerative fuel cell: Science and technology review, May
1997, p. 13, http: //www.llnl.gov/str/Mitlit.html.
[10] Ryan Baker and Jiujun Zhang Institute for fuel cell innovation. National Research of
Canada, 4250 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1W5, Canada, 2011.
[11] Steele, B.C.H., and Heinzel, Angelika. Materials for fuel-cell technologies: Nature, 2001
v. 414, p. 345–352.
62
[12] Cheng, X.; Shi, Z.; Glass, N.; Zhang, L.; Song, D.; Liu, Z. S.; Wu, S.; Merida, W. A. A
Review of PEM Hydrogen Fuel Cell. Journal of Power Sources. 2007, 165, 739-756.
[13] Schmittinger, W.; Vahidi, A.; A Review of the Main Parameters Influencing Longterm
Performance and Durability of PEM Fuel Cells. Journal of Power Sources. 2008 v
180[1], p.1-14.
[14] Thampan, T.; Malhotra, S.; Zhang, J.; Datta R. PEM Fuel Cell as a Membrane Reactor.
Catal. Today, 2001, 67[1-3], 15-32.
[15] Litster, S.; Mclean, G. PEM Fuel Cell Electrodes. J. Power Source. 2004, 130, 61.
[16] Panchenko, A.; Dilger, H.; Moller, E.; Sixt, T.; Roduner, E. Insitu EPR investigation of
Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Degradation in Fuel Cell Application. J. Power Sources
2004, 127, 325-330, doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.09.047
[17] Hogarth, W.H.J; da Costa, J.C.D; Lu, G.Q. J. Power Sources. 2005, 142 223.
[18] Thompson, S.D.; Jordan, L.R.; Forsyth, M. Platinum electrodeposition for polymer
electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta, 2001, 46, 1657-1663.
[19] Yu, T.L.; Lin, H.; Su1, P.; and Wang, G. Structures of Membrane Electrode Assembly
Catalyst Layers, The Open Fuels & Energy Science Journal, 2012, Volume 5
[20] Creager, S. E. Proposal for DOE project, 2006
[21] Smitha, B.; Sridhar, S.; Khan. A. A. Solid Polymer Electrolyte Membrane for Fuel Cell.
J. Mebran. Sci. 2005, 259, 10-26.
[22] Moilanen, D. E., Spry, D. B., Fayer, M. D.Water Dyanmics and Proton Transfer I Nafion
Fuel Cell Membranes. Langmuir 2008, 24 [8], 3690-3698
[23] Fuel Cells, Types of Fuel Cells. http;//www. Fuelcells.Org/fuel/fctypes.html, 2000.
[24] Mauritz, K.A.; Moore, R.B. State of Understanding Nafion. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104 4535-
4585.
63
[25] Hongxiang Teng. Review Overview of the Development of the Fluoropolymer Industry.
Appl. Sci. 2012, 2, 496-512; doi:10.3390/app2020496.
http;//www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci
[26] Olah, G. A.; Iyer, P. S.; Prakash, G. K. S.Perfluorinated Resinsulfonic Acid (Nafion- Hw)
Catalysis on Synthesis. Synthesis 1986, 7, 513
[27] Honma, I.; Nakajima, H.; Nishikawa, O.; Sugimoto, T.; Nomura, S. Family of High-
Temperature Polymer-Electrolyte Membranes Synthesized From Amphiphilic
Nanostructured Macromolecules, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2003, 150, A616.
[28] Arcella, V.; Ghielmi, A.; Polastri, F.; Vaccarono, P. Fluorinated membranes, EP 1589062
A2, 2005
[29] Shen Wu, H.; Martin, C. W.; Chen, X. K. Low equivalent weight ionomer, US 7094851
B2, 2006
[30] Y.G. Chun, C.S. Kim, D.H. Peck, D.R. Shin, J. Power Sources 71 (1998) 174.
[31] Gould, Elizabeth-Ann. The Photochemistry of “Super” Photoacid N-Methyl- 6-
Hydroxyquinolinium and Other Novel Photoacids. Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute
of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2012.
[32] Yang, T.F.; Hourng L.W.; Yu, T.L.; Chi, P.H.; Su, A. High performance proton exchange
membrane fuel cell electrode assemblies. J. Power Sources, 2010, 195, 7350-7369.
[33] Lee, D.; Hwang, S. Effect of loading and distributions of Nafion ionomer in the catalyst
layer for PEMFCs. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2008, 33, 2790–2794.
[34] Gadallah, F. F.; Elofson, R. M. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 3335-3339.
[35] Koppel, I. A.; Taft, R. W.; Anivia, F.; Zhu, S. Z.; Hu, L. Q.; Sun, K. S.; DesMarteau, D.
D.; Yagupolskii, L. M.; Yagupolskii, Y. L.; Vlasoz, V. M.; Notario, R.; Maria, P. C. The
64
Gas-Phase Acidities of Very Strong Neutral Bronsted Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 3047
[36] Zhang, M.; Sonoda, T.; Mishima, M.; Honda, T.; Leito, I.; Koppel, I. A.; Bonrath, W.;
and Netscher, T. Gas-Phase Acidities of bis[(perfluoralkyl)]imides. Effects of the
perfluoroalkyl group on acidity. J.Phys.Org Chem. 2014, 27 676-679
[37] Delamar, M.; De ́sarmot, G.; Fagebaume, O.; Hitmi, R.; Pinsonc, J.; Save ́ ant, J.-
M.Carbon 35 (6) (1997) 801–807; Brooksby, P.A.; Downard, A.J. Langmuir 20 (12)
2004 5038 5045.
[38] Foropoulos, J. Jr.; DesMarteau, D. D., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 104, 1982, 4260 and
Foropoulos, J. Jr.; DesMarteau, D. D., Inorg. Chem., 23, 1984, 3720
[39] Allongue, P.; Delamar, M.; Desbat, B.; Fagebaume, O.; Hitmi, R.; Pinson, J.; Save ́ant,
J.- M. J. Am Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 201-207.
[40] Ortiz, B.; Saby, C.; Champagne, G. Y.; Be ́langer, D. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1998, 455, 75
81.
[41] Saby, C.; Ortiz, B.; Champagne, G. Y.; Be ́langer, D. Langmuir 1997, 13, 6805-6813.
[42] Delamar, M.; Hitmi, R.; Pinson, J.; Save ́ant, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5883-
5884
[43] a) Mei, H.; Ibrahim, F. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 199, 46–51, 2017. b) Mei, H.;
D’Andrea, D.; Nguyen, T.-T.; Nworie,C. J. Power Sources. 248, 1177-1180, 2014. C)
Mei, H.; Nworie, C.; Abban, G.; Alayyaf, A.; MacCloud, R. Int. J. of Hydrogen
Energy, 41 (5), 3628-3637, 2016. d) Mei, H.; D’Andrea, D.; Nguyen, T.-Tr.; Nworie,
C. Journal of Power Sources, 248, 1177-1180, 2014.
[44] Polym. Chem., 2013, 4, 3370-3383.
65
[45] Schank, K., Methodicum Chimicum, Kowski, F.Z., Eds.; Academic Press: New York,
1975; Vol. 6, pp 159.
[46] Cai, K.J., He, H.Q., Chang, Y.W. and Xu, W.M. (2014) An Efficient and Green Route to
Synthesize Azo Compounds through Methyl Nitrite. Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 4,
111-119.
[47] Venzo, A.; Antonello, S.; Gascón, J. A.; Guryanov, I.; Leapman, R. D.; Perera, N. V.;
Sousa, A.; Zamuner, M.; Zanella, A.; Maran, F. Analytical Chemistry 2011, 83(16),
6355–6362.
[48] Karty J.; Organic Chemistry, Principles and Mechanism, 1st ed., W. W. Norton and
Company, New York –London, 2014, pp 1011-1027
[49] Atkins J R, Sides C R, Creager S E, Harris J L, Pennington W T, Thomas B H and
DesMarteau DD. J. New Mater. Electrochem. Syst. 2003 6.
[50] Huyser, E. S. Free-radical chain reactions; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1970.
[51] Sir Derek Barton, F. R. S.; Davidollis, W. F. R. S.,Comprehensive Organic
Chemistry,1979.
[52] Kumar, P. S.; Lokanatha Rai, K. M. Chemical Papers 66 (8) 772–778 (2012)
[53] Nworie, C. Synthesis of a 4-(Trifluoromethyl)-2-Diazonium Perfluoroalkyl
Benzenesuflonylimide (PFSI) Zwitterionic Monomer for Proton Exchange Membrane
Fuel Cell. MS. Thesis, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, 2014.
[54] Abban, G. Methodology Study of N-deacetylation of 4-acetamido
perfluoroalkylbenzenesulfonimide. MS. Thesis, East Tennessee State University, Johnson
City, TN, 2015.
[55] Shaw, R. The Chemistry of Diazonium and Diazo Groups, Patai, S., Eds.; John Wiley &
Sons: New York; 1978; pp 199-164.
66
[56] Patai, S. The Chemistry of Diazonium and Diazo Groups (II), John Wiley & Sons,
Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, An Interscience Publication, 1978, 647
[57] Mei, H.; Ibrahim, F. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 2017, 199, 46–51.
[58] Ibrahim, F. Synthesis of Diazonium (Perfluoroalkyl) Arylsulfonimide Monomers from
Perfluoro (3-Oxapent-4-ene) Sulfonyl Fluoride for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell
Thesis, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, 2016.
[59] Chalkova E.; Fedkin, M. V.; Wesolowski., D. J.; Lvov, S. N. Effect of TiO2 Surface
Properties on Perfromance of Nafion-Based Composite Membranes in High Temperature
and Low Relative Humidity PEM Fuel Cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, A1742.
[60] Toreki, R. The Glassware Gallery: Schlenk Lines and Vacuum
Lines. http://www.ilpi.com/inorganic/glassware/vacline.html (accessed Mar 15, 2016).
[61] Lepore, S. D.; Khoram, A.; Bromfield, D. C.; Cohn, P.; Jairaj, V.; Silvestri, M. A. The
Journal of Organic Chemistry 2005, 70 (18), 7443–7446.
[62] McKeen, L. W. Fluoropolymers. In Film Properties of Plastics and Elastomers; Elsevier,
2012; pp 255–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-2551-9.00011-6.
[63] Sayler, T. S.; Thrasher, J. S.; Fernandez, R. E.; Arduengo, A. J.; Bakker, M. G.;
Shaughnessy, K. H.; Desmarteau, D. D. 80–124.
[64] Teng, H. Overview of the Development of the Fluoropolymer Industry. Appl. Sci. 2012, 2
(2), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.3390/app2020496.
67
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A1: GC-MS Chromatogram of 4-sulfamonylacetanilide, (4a)
68
APPENDIX A2: GC-MS Chromatogram of 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl amide, (4b)
69
APPENDIX A3: The Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) data for FSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (6)
APPENDIX A4: The Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) data for CH3CONHPhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (7a)
RSLT0001 : 2018-07-03.chd : Polymer A : Chromatogram RI ( -6.472 - 7.081 [mV] )
- RI - Mn: 22510 Mw: 45564 Mz: 77397 Mw/Mn: 2.024
[min]5.000 10.000 15.000
1 /
8.08
3 /
3817
2 /
2251
0 /
4556
4 Peak #Retention Time
Top MWMnMw
RSLT0001 : 2018-07-03.chd : Polymer A : Chromatogram RI ( -6.472 - 7.081 [mV] )
- RI - Mn: 22510 Mw: 45564 Mz: 77397 Mw/Mn: 2.024
RSLT0002 : 2018-07-03.chd : Polymer B : Chromatogram RI ( -2.429 - 4.576 [mV] )
- RI - Mn: 25022 Mw: 47076 Mz: 76612 Mw/Mn: 1.881
[min]5.000 10.000 15.000
1 /
7.89
5 /
4998
0 /
2502
2 /
4707
6 Peak #Retention Time
Top MWMnMw
RSLT0002 : 2018-07-03.chd : Polymer B : Chromatogram RI ( -2.429 - 4.576 [mV] )
- RI - Mn: 25022 Mw: 47076 Mz: 76612 Mw/Mn: 1.881
70
APPENDIX A5: The Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) data for 4-NH2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (8a)
Result of molecular weight calculation (RI)
Peak 1 Valley Peak
[min] [mV] [mol] Mn 28,890
Peak start 6.838 -0.092 315,350 Mw 56,920
Peak top 8.425 0.394 28,995 Mz 106,974
Peak end 9.243 0.082 7,806 Mz+1 162,516
Mv 56,920
Height [mV] 0.564 Mp 28,996
Area [mV*sec] 50.263 Mz/Mw 1.879
Area% [%] 100.000 Mw/Mn 1.970
[eta] 56920.01147 Mz+1/Mw 2.855
[mV]
[min]
-5.000
0.000
5.000
0.000 5.000 10.000 15.000
1 /
8.42
5 Peak No.Retention time
71
APPENDIX A6: The Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) data for 4-N2+PhSO2N-SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (9a)
72
APPENDIX A7: 19FNMR spectrum of perfluorobenzoyl peroxide, (2), 400MHZ, CDCl3
73
APPENDIX B1: 19FNMR spectrum of FSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (6), 400MHZ, CD3CN
74
APPENDIX B2: 19FNMR spectrum of 4-NO2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (7b), 400MHZ, CD3CN
75
APPENDIX B3: 19F NMR spectrum of CH3CON(M)PhSO2NHSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (7a), 400MHZ, CD3CN
76
APPENDIX B4: 19F NMR spectrum of 4-NH2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (8a), 400MHZ, CD3CN
77
APPENDIX B5: 19FNMR spectrum of 4- N2+ PhSO2N-SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (9a), 400MHZ, CD3CN
78
Appendix C1: 1H NMR spectrum of 4-sulfamonylacetanilide, (4a), 400MHZ, CD3CN
79
Appendix C2: 1H NMR spectrum of 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl amide, (4b), 400MHZ, CD3CN
80
Appendix C3: 1H NMR spectrum of 4-NO2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (7b),400MHZ, CD3CN
81
Appendix C4: Expanded 1H NMR spectrum of 4-NO2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (7b),400MHZ, CD3CN
82
Appendix C5: 1H NMR spectrum of CH3CONHPhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (7a), 400MHZ, CD3CN
83
Appendix C6: 1H NMR spectrum of 4-NH2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (8a), 400MHZ, CD3CN
84
Appendix C7: Expanded 1H NMR spectrum of 4-NH2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (8a), 400MHZ, CD3CN
85
Appendix C8: 1H NMR spectrum of 4-N2+PhSO2N-SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (9a), 400MHZ, CD3CN
86
APPENDIX D1: FT-IR Spectrum of perfluorobenzoyl peroxide, (2)
87
APPENDIX D2: FT-IR Spectrum of 4-sulfamonylacetanilide, (4a)
88
APPENDIX D3: FT-IR Spectrum of 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl amide, (4b)
89
APPENDIX D4: FT-IR Spectrum of FSO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (6)
90
APPENDIX D5: FT-IR Spectrum of 4-NO2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (7b)
91
APPENDIX D6: FT-IR Spectrum of CH3CONHPhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (7a)
92
APPENDIX D7: FT-IR Spectrum of 4-NH2PhSO2N(M)SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (8a)
93
APPENDIX D8: FT-IR Spectrum of 4-N2+PhSO2N-SO2CF2CF2O(CFCF2)n, (9a)
94
VITA
HELAL ALHARBI
Education: M.S. Chemistry, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City,
Tennessee 2019
B.S. Chemistry, Qassim University, Qassim, Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia, 2013
Professional Experience: Teaching Assistant, Qassim University, Qassim, Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia, 2013-2014
Award: First Place, Natural Science Poster Presentation (Group A) at the
2018 Appalachian Student Research Forum, Johnson City, TN,
USA, April 2018.