system design and management analysis msft bridy final
TRANSCRIPT
Running head: MICROSOFT CORPORATION SYSTEM 1
Microsoft Corporation System Design and Management Analysis
Dick Bridy
University of Phoenix
Abstract
Bill Gates sought innovation and demanded dialogue and coordination from internal and
external stakeholders to achieve the goal “to help people and businesses throughout the world
realize their full potential”. The analytic paper was an assessment of Microsoft (MSFT) based
on the influences of contextual and cultural factors and stakeholders on systems design and
management practices from an executive’s perspective. The analysis is based on stakeholder
relationships that influenced MSFT’s systems design and lead to improvements to maximize
stakeholder value. There are six contextual factors of focus: key characteristics of internal and
external relationships, the competitive landscape, strategic opportunities, challenges,
performance improvement, major stakeholder groups (customers, employees, investors,
suppliers, partners, community, and senior leadership team. The result was an insider’s view of
the systematic way MSFT operates with the customer in mind.
Microsoft Corporation System Design and Management Analysis
The paper contains an assessment from an executive’s perspective, based on the
influences of contextual and cultural factors and stakeholders on Microsoft Corporation’s
(MSFT) systems design and management practices. The goal is to analyze how the influences
shape MSFT’s systems design and lead to improvements to maximize stakeholder value. Six
contextual factors will be analyzed, they are: 1) key characteristics, 2) internal and external
relationships, 3) competitive landscape, 4) strategic opportunities, challenges, and performance
improvement 5) major stakeholder groups (customers, employees, investors, suppliers, partners,
the community), and 6) senior leadership team (Gordon, 2012).
Key characteristics
Wood (2000) contends that the equilibrium between structure and chaos is the key to
sustained creativity. Extreme insecurity discourages employees from mustering the best effort.
Freedom is fostered by direction, purpose, and selective structure. MSFT balances bureaucratic
processes and structure at one end with the creative chaos of transactions, interests, and
relationships, which enable it to be innovative at the other (Wood, 2000).
"Without order nothing can exist – without chaos nothing can evolve."
"New ideas are not born in a conforming environment."
– Roger von Oech
Internal and external relationships
The external sharing and connecting can be leveraged within the organization (Morgan,
2009). Collaborating externally fosters relationships with customers, shareholders, and
stakeholders. External stakeholder collaboration increases revenue and customer service. The
process decreases product development, research, and marketing costs. MSFT has adopted the
philosophy that internal collaboration enhances the organization’s core. Dialogue unites
employees and promotes a shared culture. The results are increased team productivity, leveraging
core knowledge that reduces decision-cycle times (Morgan, 2009). Success is a function of a
well designed structure. For example, at MSFT strategy is primary, and the tools are secondary.
The division heads concentrate on three elements: business value, opportunity costs, and risks.
The use of benchmarking is a valuable tool to establish a solid measurement framework that
aligns with the business objectives. Additional objectives focus on the cultivation and nurturing
of a collaborative culture and to establish a solid adoption plan. A final and important series of
goals is to establish training programs and governance guidelines focused on external and
internal collaboration that establishes policy of cooperation, respect, and engagement (Morgan,
2009). .
Competitive landscape
"If you possess the market, you eventually possess the profits."
- Bill Gates
The MSFT competitive strategy is based on a series of goals designed by Gates (2010).
The first requirement is to concentrate on a market with enormous potential and few competitors.
Become the first entry, get big, and become the dominant industry leader (Gates, 2010). Industry
leadership requires an obligation of MSFT to set the industry standard, produce the best product
or service, make it useful, and the least expensive. The key to MSFT’s success has been the
ability to establish a proprietary position. MSFT owns what they sell and protects that position
vigorously. To that end, MSFT employs a system of intellectual property management (IPM).
The goals focus on the customer and strategic alliances. One goal is to make the customers and
strategic alliances an offer one cannot refuse by providing products or maintaining MSFT
relationships that provide continual improvement and value-added results. The final mandate is
to innovate and improve the MSFT products and services (Farahani, & Chitsaz, 2010).
For example, MSFT implements internal research and external acquisitions to develop
new product lines and achieve a sustained competitive advantage and respond to the customers’
needs (Porter, 1990). In 2004, MSFT decided to enter the security business to gain market share
from Norton Antivirus (Symantec) and McAfee (Kotadia, 2005). The result was the acquisition
of two antivirus companies and an anti-spyware company. The spyware acquisition produced an
anti-spyware application for Windows that launched the Trustworthy Computing Initiative (TCI)
(Kotadia, 2005). The venture changed MSFT’s coding practices to render security developers'
first priority.
Strategic opportunities and challenges, and performance improvement
MSFT is facing the challenge of adapting the business to the rapidly changing market,
environment, and customer demand. The organization is confronted with the mandate to sustain
and improve the performance of core business. The call to action is to leverage core
competencies, to drive key performance indicators (KPIs), and create value to outperform the
competition (Doz, & Kosonen, 2008; Gordon, 2012; Jacobs, 2008). MSFT must combine
analytical skills, industry experience, and proven tools to accelerate the performance
improvement process. MSFT views the process as acquiring and retaining customers, the critical
stakeholder. The process mandates programs that maintain market leadership versus one of
survival (Doz, & Kosonen, 2008).
For example, MSFT views customer value as more than offering a low cost-benefit ratio;
they seek to provide a value-added product or service. The company seeks to attain customer
intimacy versus customer satisfaction. Product innovations are more than new attributes and line
extensions; they are new product categories, brands, and speed. MSFT is constantly seeking
sustained competitive advantage (Porter, 1990). The growth force is based on distinctive product
capabilities versus merely building resources. Business and process innovation at MSFT is
systematic opposed to a linear process. Technology innovation is paradigmatic versus
incremental based on an enterprise-wide scope of creating new business models (MSFT Mission,
2012).
Major stakeholder groups
Thompson (n.d.) defines stakeholder analysis as a process of “systematically gathering
and analyzing qualitative information to determine whose interests should be taken into account
when developing and implementing a policy or program” (p. 1). The key steps in the process are:
1) identifying the stakeholders, 2) prioritize them, and 3) understand the key stakeholders
(Thompson, n.d.). Clarkson (1995) classifies primary stakeholders as individuals whose
continuing participation, the corporation are required to exist as a going concern. The
relationships are characterized by mutual interdependence. Clarkson (1995) includes
shareholders, partners, suppliers, employees, customers, communities as well as the government.
The MSFT stakeholders are internal and external. The list of stakeholders, subject to this study is
the: customers, employees, investors, suppliers, partners, the community, the Board, and senior
leadership team (Gordon, 2012). The following sections will address Microsoft stakeholder
interest and the effect on the system as depicted in Figure 1 (MSFT Structure, 2010).
Figure 1
Microsoft Stakeholders
(MSFT Structure, 2010).
The customer relationship
Gates (2010) views the most important stakeholder relationship is with the customer. The
Microsoft mission is to “help people and businesses throughout the world realize full potential”
(MSFT Mission, 2012, p. 1). The Week Three submission presented an overview of the
organizational management systems (process). The message was that the effectiveness of an
organization’s management system determines how well an organization manages risks; meets
operational, financial, and quality goals; supports innovation, and achieves high customer and
stakeholder satisfaction (Majstorovic & Marinkovic, 2011). The focus of that essay was on
internal and alliance systematic relationships. One cannot lose sight of the most important
stakeholder in the business relationship – the customer. The MSFT focuses on customer goals,
using “data, the opinions of internal experts, benchmarking, gathering information, engaging in
dialogue, and seeking feedback” (Phipps, 2004, p. 77).
The listening system
Microsoft employs a listening system that provides the feedback from studies such as the
Microsoft Customer and Partner Satisfaction Survey (MCPSS), the Enterprise Customer
Satisfaction Survey (ECSS), as well as product satisfaction surveys, usability studies, online
feedback forms, and research forums. MSFT customers can choose to give feedback through the
Customer Experience Improvement Program (CEIP), a product-based technology that provides
real-time feedback about Microsoft product experiences. The listening system facilitates the
removal of bugs, prioritizes content for service packs, and identifies desired features for future
products (MSFT Customer experience, 2012).
Employees
MSFT employee expectations are simply stated: 1) fair compensation, 2) respect for their
person and their views, 3) opportunities for growth and advancement, and 4) membership in a
winning team (Wood, 2001). MSFT provides multiple resources to assist in the balance work
and home life such as referral services, generous maternity, parental leave allowances, and
flexible work arrangements, such as part-time, flex-time, and telecommuting (MSFT Corporate
citizenship, 2011). The goal is to have happy, successful, and productive employees.
Investors
Investor relations are a high priority at MSFT. Communication and transparency are the
cornerstones of investor relations. The financial reporting system is refined to deliver the latest
financial and operational information to the stakeholders on a timely basis. To the MSFT Board,
investor relations (IR) are systematic functions that support the communication process. IR is the
strategic corporate activity that promotes the investment case of Microsoft Corporation "on the
radar screen" of corporate analysts and the mutual fund managers (MSFT MBD, 2012, p. 1).
Suppliers and partners
Suppliers or vendors and Microsoft’s partners are engaged in either the Microsoft Vendor
Program (MVP) or the Microsoft Master Vendor Agreement (MMVA). The objective is to make
working with Microsoft beneficial to B2B customers and partners. Ensuring satisfaction among
vendors and partners is a core component of Microsoft through the Customer - Partner
Experience (MSFT Customer, 2011). For example, MSFT partners with the government to
nurture an environment in which opportunity and growth can flourish through several mediums.
Partnership arrangements have been established in innovation and research, technology for
development, IP incentives, technology infrastructure, Global IT marketing, and a human
resources (HR) based program to attract Global talent (MSFT Customer, 2011).
Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are beneficiaries of the MSFT commitment to
the civil society. The MSFT commitment is to assist NGOs by advancing social and economic
development through the use of technology. The strategy is focused on ensuring NGO
technological access to secure sources, optimizing IT solutions, and transforming NGO
operations through the implementation of technology (MSFT Corporate citizenship, 2011).
Community
MSFT has established a citizenship initiative titled, Microsoft’s Citizenship Initiative
(MCI). Microsoft’s Governance Committee (MGC) has responsibility for MCI (MSFT Corporate
citizenship, 2011). Microsoft's citizenship mission is to serve the needs of communities and
fulfill responsibilities to the public. Through partnerships, MSFT technology innovations, the
employees, and resources; MSFT seeks to solve societal challenges and create economic
opportunities on both a global and a local level (MSFT Corporate Citizenship, 2011). Citizenship
work helps empower individuals, strengthen communities, and drive economic growth. The
Partners in Learning (PIL) initiative reached nearly 16 million students and teachers, and the
BizSpark program helped 75,000 individuals grow their small businesses in 2011 (MSFT
Corporate Citizenship, 2011). Environmental conservation has a top priority at MSFT; for 2011,
the company reduced computer energy use by 27%. Governance is another high priority;
Governance Metrics International awarded a 9.5 out of 10.0 market rating (MSFT Corporate
citizenship, 2011).
Five product groups
The five product groups vend technology software and services to the customer. The
product groups are referred to as a matrix system. A matrix system superimposes, “a group or
interdisciplinary team of project specialists, such as scientific and engineering personnel, on a
functional organizational design. In a matrix organization, members have dual allegiance to a
particular assignment or project and the organizational department” (Matrix management, 2012,
p. 1). The five MSFT product groups are: 1) Windows and Live Windows Group (PC operating
software and Windows products); 2) Server Software (Internet server software); 3) Online
Services (advertising and Bing), 4) Microsoft Business (business-related software and servers),
and 5) Entertainment and Devices (Xbox, Zune, and automotive industry software) (Form 10-K,
2010); MSFT Structure, 2011).
The permanent divisional MSFT groups have internal mission and goal frameworks.
Cross-functional project teams have, “a definitive, purpose, the problem/opportunity, parameters,
products/outcomes, resources, suggested approaches, reporting relationships, roles, and
timeframes, milestones, and deadlines” (Phipps, 2004, p. 81). The MSFT personnel are trained to
focus on customer goals, using “data, the opinions of internal experts, benchmarking, gathering
information, engaging in dialogue, and seeking feedback” (p. 77). The organizational goal of
developing system relationships is founded in facilitative leadership. The facilitative leader
transcends buy-in, the process “uses external rewards or the honor of positive associative
relationships with individual leaders to gain compliance” (Senge, 1990, p. 218-219).
Board and senior leadership team
The MSFT board of directors (Board) contains nine members. Members include Bill
Gates, the founder and chairman, the chief executive officer (CEO), and Steve Ballmer with
seven independent and non - management directors. The Board supervises organizational
activities with the use of five integral committees: 1) antitrust compliance, 2) audit, 3)
compensation, 4) governance and nominating, and 5) finance (Hamilton, 2011; MSFT Board,
2010). Senior management is composed of, “seven group presidents, five senior vice presidents,
such as human resources and marketing, the chief research and strategy officer, the chief
software architect, the general counsel, and the chief operating officer that report to the CEO,
Steve Ballmer” (Hamilton, 2011, p. 1). The Board and senior managers have the responsibility to
influence contextual and cultural factors that affect Microsoft Corporation’s systems design and
management practices (MSFT Board, 2010).
Conclusion
The preceding paper was an assessment based on the influences of contextual and
cultural factors and stakeholders on Microsoft Corporation’s (MSFT) systems design and
management practices from an executive’s perspective. The analysis of stakeholder relationships
influenced MSFT’s systems design and lead to improvements to maximize stakeholder value.
The analysis was based on contextual factors. Key characteristics of internal and external
relationships are the competitive landscape, strategic opportunities, challenges, performance
improvement, and major stakeholder groups (customers, employees, investors, suppliers,
partners, community, and senior leadership team). The result was an appreciation of the
systematic way to operate with the customer in mind. Bill Gates sought innovation and
demanded dialogue and coordination from internal and external stakeholders to achieve the goal
“to help people and businesses throughout the world realize their full potential” (MSFT Mission,
2010, p. 1).
References
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate
social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2008). Fast strategy: How strategic agility will help you stay ahead of
the game. New York, NY: Pearson/Longman.
Farahani, S. M., & Chitsaz, G. (2010). Continual improvement with integrated management
system. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66, 1349-1353.
Franken, A., Edwards, C., & Lambert, R. (2009, Spring). Executing strategic change:
understanding the critical management elements that lead to success. California
Management Review, 51(3), 49.
Gates, W. (2010).
Gordon, P. (2012). Syllabus. University of Phoenix (SAS). Retrieved from
https://classroom.phoenix.edu/afm215/secure/view-thread.jspa?threadID=38906894
Hamilton, V. (2011). What is the Microsoft corporation's organizational structure? ehow.com.
Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/facts_6917145_microsoft-corporation_s-
organizational-structure_.html
Jacobs, J. (2008, March). Performance dashboards: Is yours working for you? Managing the
Margin, 6(3), 5-6.
Kotadia, M. (2005). Gartner takes Microsoft to task. CNET-News. Retrieved from
http://news.cnet.com/Gartner-takes-Microsoft-to-task/2100-7355_3-5582742.html?
tag=nefd.top
Majstorovic, V. D., & Marinkovic, V. (2011). The development of business standardization and
integrated management systems. Journal of Medicine and Biochemistry, 30(4), 334-345.
doi: 10.2478/v10011-011-0015-5
Matrix management (2012). Barron's Business Dictionary: Matrix Organization. Barron's
Business Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.answers.com/topic/matrix-
organization#ixzz1k1xZZ7Fa
Morgan, J. (2009). Importance of external and internal collaboration: Social business.
ZDnet.com. Retrieved from http://www.zdnet.com/blog/feeds/importance-of-external-
and-internal-collaboration/2249
MSFT Board (2010). Microsoft news: Microsoft board of directors. Microsoft web site.
Retrieved from http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/bod/bod.aspx
MSFT Corporate citizenship (2011). Microsoft 2011 corporate citizenship report. Microsoft web
site. Retrieved from
http://www.microsoft.com/about/corporatecitizenship/en-us/reporting/
MSFT Customer (2012). Listening systems. Microsoft web site. Retrieved from
http://www.microsoft.com/about/cpe/en/us/default.aspx
MSFT MBD (2011). Microsoft Business Division: Investor relations. Microsoft web site.
Retrieved from
http://www.microsoft.com/investor/CompanyInfo/SegmentInfo/MicrosoftBusinessDivisi
on/Overview.aspx
MSFT Mission (2012). Our Mission. Microsoft web site. Retrieved from
http://www.microsoft.com/about/en/us/default.aspx
MSFT Structure, (2010). Structure. Microsoft web site. Retrieved from
http://www.microsoft.com/investor/CorporateGovernance/Goals/default.aspx
Phipps, S. E. (2004, Summer). The system design approach to organizational development: The
University of Arizona model. Library Trends, 53(1), 68.
Porter, M. E. (1990). Competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New
York: Doubleday/Currency.
Thompson, R. (n.d.). Stakeholder analysis. Mindtools.com. Retrieved from
http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newPPM_07.htm
UPOX (2009). MGT/736 Contemporary systems management course description. University of
Phoenix. Retrieved from
https://portal.phoenix.edu/classroom/coursematerials/mgt_736/20120103/
Wood, R. (2000). Managing Complexity. London; Economists Books.
Wood, R. (2001). What stakeholders want: The employees. Gantthead.com. Retrieved from
http://www.gantthead.com/content/articles/16077.cfm