systematic analysis of explosive residues.pdf

Upload: lisseth-chaves

Post on 05-Jul-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    1/24

    A . D . B e v e r i d g e , P h . D . ; S . F . P a y t o n , ~ B . S c . ;

    R . J . A u d e t t e , 2 P h . D . ; A . J . L a m b e r t u s , ~ B . S c . ; a n d

    R . C . S h a d d i c k , ~ M . S c .

    Sys t em at ic na lys is o f Exp los ive R e s idues

    Examination of bomb scene evidence is an area o f increasing involvement for the

    forensic scientist in which incidents may vary from student mischief to mass murder.

    To undertake explosive casework responsibilities, the scientist must have personal

    experience of the type of physical evidence left after explosions, including device re-

    mains, characteristic damage, and chemical residues.

    Recognition of device remains is aided by law enforcement agency publications [1-6].

    Explosive damage to metal has been studied [7] and the significance of damage in bomb

    incident investigations has been discussed in general terms [8]. Chemical residues may

    contain unreacted explosive components

    [ 9 - 1 3 ]

    and also condensed reaction products

    [12 14].

    Solid products have been studied less than gaseous products, but have been

    reviewed for black powder [14 15] and chlorate and perchlorate mixtures [16]. Smokeless

    powders yield nitrites which form the basis of propellent powder pattern tests

    [17 18].

    Since solid reaction products from dynamite do no work, their chemical composition has

    been deduced more from thermodynamic calculations than analysis [12 19].

    Published methods for explosive residue analysis include microscopic examination for

    unreacted explosive

    [ 1 0 1 1 ]

    chemical spot tests

    [10 13 15 20 21]

    thin-layer chromatog-

    raphy TLC) [9 10 22 23] and infrared spectroscopy [24 25].

    This study presents a scheme for systematic analysis of explosive residues isolated by

    physical removal or solvent extraction. The techniques are a combination of infrared

    spectroscopy, TLC, X-ray diffraction, emission spectrography, microscopy, and

    chemical spot tests. Application to residue analysis is demonstrated by test explosions

    using black powder, single- and double-base smokeless powder, chlorate/sugar,

    dynamite, C4 plastic explosive, and PETN-based detonating cord a glossary of terms

    is given in Appendix A).

    xperimental

    A n a l y s i s

    The analytical scheme in Fig. 1 was applied to all of the explosives and their

    residues. Figures 2 and 3 expand on the solvent extracts.

    Received for publication 11 Nov. 1974; accepted for publication 23 Jan. 1975.

    1Section Head, Chemistry Section, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Crime Detection Labora-

    tory, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

    2Forensic Scientists, Chemistry Section, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Crime Detection

    Laboratory, Edmonton, Alta., Canada.

    43

    J Forensic Sci, Jul. 1975, Vol. 20, No. 3

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    2/24

    43

    J O U R N A L F F O R E N S I C S C I E N C E S

    CHE~ICAL~ESIDUE

    UNREACTEDXPLOSIVE

    IR

    I

    I

    ETHER

    R

    I

    TLC

    DEBRS

    I

    STEREOMICROSCOPE

    l

    DEVICEPARIS

    ETC.

    1

    EXPLOSIVEWRAPPERS

    ACETONE WATER~ INSOLUBLE

    R

    TLC POLARIZING ICROSCOPE

    I

    X-RAYIFF IR ES TLC SPOT ESTS

    FIG. 1 G ener a l scheme or ana lys is o f exp los ive residues.

    RNO

    P l a s t i c i z e r

    W a x

    P e t r o l e u m

    I

    NaOHIGRIESS

    G

    EGND

    ETHER

    I

    IR

    TLC RNO 2

    I NR4N03

    CNS

    Benzene /n -Hexane ( l : l ) P las t i c i ze r

    o r

    Xylene/n-He•

    T i C 13 D M A B

    TIIT

    DNT

    ACETONE

    I

    I R

    F

    i

    NaOHIGRIESS

    TiCi3/DMAB

    I

    NC TNT

    NG DNT

    EGDN

    Benzene/n-Hexa~e(1 : l )

    o r Xy lene /n -Hexane {3 :2 )

    [ - -

    EtOH

    NESSLERS

    FIG.

    2 A na l y s i s o f o rgan i c ex trac t s.

    7

    T L C

    EtOH I

    CHCl3/Acetone

    1 : 1 )

    I NaOH/ J

    D i p h e n y l

    GR~ESS

    amine/H2S04 I

    T h y m o l l

    I H2SO

    o ~ p E T . I

    RDX RDX

    E x p l o s i v es a n d E x p l o s i o n s

    T a b l e 1 s u m m a r i z e s t h e e x p l o s iv e s a n d c o n d i t i o n s u s e d i n th i s s tu d y . C h a r g e s w e r e

    m a d e u p a n d in i ti a te d b y E x p l o s iv e O r d n a n c e D i s p o s a l E O D ) t r a in e d p e r s o n n e l u s i n g

    s a f e t y f u s e , n o n e l e c tr i c b l a st in g c a p s , a n d d e t o n a t i n g c o r d b o o s t e r s a s r e q u ir e d . L o w

    e x p l o s iv e s w e r e c o n f i n e d i n l / t i n , w a l l st e e l p i p e s w i t h th r e a d e d e n d c a p s . E x p l o s i v e

    r e s i d u e r e c o v e r y p r o c e d u r e s w e r e c o n c e n t r a t e d o n r e c o g n i z a b l e d e v i c e r e m a i n s , t h e

    c r a t e r , a n d a d j a c e n t s u r f a c e s .

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    3/24

    BEVERIDGE ET L ON EXPLOSIVE RESIDUES 4

    I

    I R

    N O ~

    SO ~

    C O ~

    W A T E R

    I

    E S

    K

    N a

    I ~ g e t c .

    P O L A R I Z I N G M I C R O S C O P E

    X - R A Y D I F F .

    U N E X P L O D E D P R O D U C T S

    N a N O K 2 S O

    K N O N ~ 2 S O

    N H 4 N O N a 2 C O

    I N S O L U B L E

    SPOT

    T E S T S T L C

    1

    U L P

    NH~

    C I - E t O H

    F I G 3 Analysis o f aqueous extracts.

    1 E t O H

    D I P N E N Y L - N E S S L E R S

    A N N E I H 2 S O 4 R E A GE N T

    [

    o ~ N ~

    Techniques

    ln f ra red Spec t ro scopy- -A

    P e r k i n E l m e r M o d e l 4 5 7 A i n f r a r e d s p e c t r o p h o t o m e t e r w a s

    u s e d . E th e r a n d a c e to n e l i q u id e x t r a c t s we r e s a n d wic h e d b e twe e n 1 3 - m m KBr d i s k s

    a n d r e c o v e r e d b y wa s h in g . S o l i d s we r e a n a ly z e d a s KBr p e l l e t s o r n o n d e s t r u c t i v e ly o n a

    d i a m o n d c ell ( H i g h P r es s u r e D i a m o n d O p t i c s, M c L e a n , V a . ).

    I n f r a r e d ( I R) a n a ly s i s m a y i d e n t i f y e x p lo s iv e c o m p o n e n t s [24 25] ino rgan ic ions [26] ,

    a n d c o n t a m i n a n t s , a n d m a y a id T L C s e le c ti o n a n d i n te r p r e ta t i o n .

    Th in -Layer Chroma tography- -TLC wa s r u n o n 0 .2 5 - m m , p r e c o a t e d s i l i c a g e l G g l a s s

    p l a te s ( M a c k e r y - Na g e l a n d C o . , D u r e n , Ge r m a n y ) . P r i n c ip a l s o lv e n t s y s t e m s we r e

    b e n z e n e [23] b e n z e n e / h e x a n e [10] x y l e n e / h e x a n e [10] e t h a n o l [ 9 ] , a n d c h l o r o f o r m /

    a c e t o n e [ 9]. D e v e l o p e rs w e r e N a O H / G r i e s s r e a ge n t [23] t i t a n iu m t r i c h lo r id e /d im e th y l -

    a m i n o b e n z a l d e h y d e ( T i C I ~ /D M A B ) [ 9] , d i p h e n y l a m i n e / H 2 S O , , a n d e t h a n o l / N e s s l e r

    r e a g e n t . T h e d e v e lo p e r s a r e a p p l i e d a s f o l lo ws .

    N a O H / G r i e s s : S p r a y w i t h 1 N N a O H , h o l d i n o v e n a t 1 0 0 ~ f o r 1 0 m i n , c o o l , a n d

    s p r a y w i th Gr i e ss r e a g e n t ( 0 .2 5 s u l fa n i l ic a c id a n d 0 .1 a - n a p h th y l a m in e i n 1 :1

    a q u e o u s a c e ti c a c id ) . R e d s p o t f o r E G D N , N G , N C , R D X , P E T N . H i g h c o n c e n t r a t i o n s

    a p p e a r a s a y e l l o w s p o t w i th r e d e d g e s [ 9 ] . T NT g iv e s b r o wn s p o t s .

    T i C l J D M A B : S p r a y w i t h 1 5 T i C I~ /H C 1 , a i r -d r y , a n d s p r a y w i th D M A B r e a g e n t

    (1 g D M A B i n 30 m l E t O H , 3 m l H C 1 1 :1 9 , 18 0 m l B u O H ) . T N T a n d D N T g i v e y e l lo w

    spots [9] .

    P h 2 N H / H 2 S O , : S p r a y w i t h 1 P h 2 N H i n c o n c . H 2 S O , . B lu e s p o t f o r n i tr a te s .

    E t O H / N e s s l e r : S p r a y w it h E t O H f o l lo w e d b y N e s s le r r e a g en t . O r a n g e s p o t f o r N H , §

    X-Ray Powder Dif fraction--Eqtf lpment was a Ph il ips X-ra y genera to r (PW 1130 /00 /60)

    w i t h a c o p p e r d i f f r a c t i o n t u b e ( T y p e R D 6 0 / 2 P W 2 1 0 3 / 0 0 ) , o p e r a t e d a t 5 0 m A ,

    4 0 k V , w i th 1 0 t o 2 5 - m in e x p o s u r e . A n i c k e l fi l te r r e m o v e d C u K8 r a d i a t i o n . S a m p le s

    we r e c o n t a in e d i n 0 .3 - m m c a p i l l a r i e s i n De b y e S c h e r r e r l 1 4 .8 - m m p o wd e r c a m e r a s .

    I l f o r d I n d u s t r i al T y p e G X - r a y f i lm w a s u s e d.

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    4/24

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    5/24

    BEVERIDGE ET AL ON EXPLOSIVE RESIDU ES 4 5

    X- r a y p o wd e r d i f f r a c t i o n p e r m i t s n o n d e s t r u c t i v e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f c r y s t a l l i n e m a te r i a l s

    b y c o m p a r i s o n t o s t a n d a r d s o r b y u s e o f t h e A m e r i c a n S o c i et y f o r T e s ti n g a n d

    M a te r i a l s ( AS T M ) P o wd e r D i f f r a c t i o n F i l e [ 2 7 ] .

    Emiss ion Spec trograph--Equipment wa s a J a r r e l l - As h 3 .4 - m E b e r t w i th d c a r c

    exc i ta t ion a t 10 A fo r 10 s us ing a 10-/ Jm s li t. Sam ples we re con ta ined in 1A- in . ou ts ide

    d i a m e te r c a r b o n c u p s . T h e e m i s s io n s p e c t r o g r a p h wa s e m p lo y e d t o i d e n t i f y e x p lo s iv e

    m e ta l l i c c o n t e n t s u c h a s a lk a l i m e t a l s , m in e r a l c o n t a m in a n t s s u c h a s b o r o n i n Ch i l e

    s a l t p e t e r , a n d m a n u f a c tu r e r a d d i t i v e s .

    Polar iz ing M icroscope--E quipm ent w a s a L e i tz O r t h o p l a n m i c r o s c o p e e q u i p p e d w it h

    a n i n t e r f e r e n c e we d g e ( L e i t z S - 1 0 0 ) a n d a M e t t l e r F P 5 - F P 5 2 h o t s t a g e . T h i s i n s t r u m e n t

    p e r m i t s n o n d e s t r u c t i v e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n o f c r y s t a l l i n e m a te r i a l s b y m o r p h o lo g i c a l a n a ly s i s

    [28]

    a n d r e a d y i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f i s o t r o p i c s u b s t a n c e s la y t h e Be c k e l in e t e c h n iq u e f o r

    re f rac t ive index r iD.

    Spo t Tes t s - -Spo t t e s t s we r e m a in ly t h o s e d e s c r ib e d b y Am a s a n d Ya l lo p [13 20].

    Ch e m ic a l s p o t t e s t s we r e u s e d t o c h e c k c o m p o n e n t s s u c h a s NO~ - , wh ic h i n l o w y i e ld

    ( < 1 0~ m ig h t b e m i s s e d b y i n s t r u m e n ta l a n a ly s is , a n d f o r r a p id s c re e n in g o f a h ig h

    y ie ld o f re s idue .

    Resu l t s

    T a b le s 2 , 3 , a n d 4 s u m m a r i z e t h e a n a ly s i s o f r e s id u e s f r o m th e e x p lo s iv e s l i s t e d i n

    T a b l e 1 , b y u s e o f t h e s c h e m e in F ig . 1 .

    i s c u s s i o n

    L o w E xplosives

    L o w e x p lo s iv e s c o n f in e d i n s t e e l p ip e s w i th t h r e a d e d e n d c a p s e x p lo d e d o n f l a m e

    in i t ia t i o n . F ig u r e 4 il l us t ra t e s d a m a g e t o tw o s e ri es o f p ip e s b y c h a r g e s o f b l a c k p o w d e r ,

    s i n g l e - b a s e s m o k e l e s s p o wd e r ( r i f l e p r o p e l l a n t ) , d o u b l e - b a s e s m o k e l e s s p o wd e r ( p i s t o l

    p r o p e ll a n t) , a n d ( f o r c o m p a r i s o n ) d y n a m i t e . F r a g m e n t a t i o n b y c h l o r a t e / s u g a r w a s

    s im i l a r t o s i n g l e - b a s e p o wd e r . T h e d e g r e e o f f r a g m e n ta t i o n i s s e e n t o b e m u c h h ig h e r f o r

    d o u b le - b a s e p o w d e r t h a n f o r t h e o th e r l o w e x p lo s ive s .

    T a b l e 2 s u m m a r i z e s t h e a n a ly s i s o f t h e l o w e x p lo s iv e s a n d t h e i r r e s id u e s u s in g t h e

    scheme in F ig . 1 .

    B la c k p o wd e r g a v e p ip e f r a g m e n t s w i th f r e s h r u s ty a r e a s a n d a h ig h y i e ld o f

    g r a y i s h re s id u e . Un r e a c t e d g r a n u l e s we r e c o m m o n ly r e c o v e r e d i n p ip e th r e a d s a n d s o m e -

    t im e s i n t h e b o d y o f t h e p ip e . T h e s u r r o u n d in g s w e r e u su a l l y b l a c k e n e d . F ig u r e 5 s h o ws

    th e e f f e c t o f a 0 .7 5 - 1 b c h a r g e i n a c o r n e r o f a 9 b y 1 2 - f t r o o m . P ip e f r a g m e n t s a r e

    s h o w n i n th e b o t t o m r o w o f F i g. 4 . A n a l y s i s o f d e b r is f r o m t h is e x p l o s io n is s u m m a r i z e d

    in T a b l e 2 , No . 4 . T h io c y a n a t e w a s id e n t i f ie d b y 1 R s p e c t r o s c o p y i n a n a c e to n e e x t r a c t .

    B l a c k p o wd e r r e s id u e c o n s i s t e d p r im a r i l y o f p o t a s s iu m s u l f a t e i d e n t i f i e d b y X- r a y

    p o w d e r d i f f r a c t i o n . A n 1 R s p e c t r u m o f t y p i c a l r e s id u e ( F ig . 6 ) s h o w e d s t r o n g s u l f a t e a n d

    we a k n i t r a t e . W e a k c a r b o n a t e p e a k s a n d a b s e n c e o f n i tr a t e p e a k s we r e a l s o o b s e r v e d i n

    d i f f e r e n t e x p lo s io n s ; t h a t i s , c o m p o s i t i o n a n d d i s t r i b u t i o n o f e x p lo s iv e r e s id u e wa s n o t

    u n i f o r m . R e v i e w s [14 15] s u g g e st a h ig h e r p e r c e n t a g e o f p o t a s s iu m c a r b o n a t e , b u t s i n c e

    i t wa s n o t o b s e r v e d i n X- r a y p o w d e r d i f f r a c t i o n p a t t e r n s , t h is i n d i c a te s t h a t i ts y i e ld is

    le ss t h a n 1 0 . T h e s a f e ty f u s e a l s o g a v e p o t a s s iu m s u l f a t e as p ri n c ip a l re s id u e f r o m th e

    b l a c k p o w d e r c o r e .

    T h e v a lu e o f p r o d u c t i d e n t i f i c a t io n i s il l u s tr a t e d i n T a b l e 2 , N o . 3 , s in c e if th e f e w

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    6/24

    4

    =

     

    G

    o

    o

    T

    A

    2

    A

    n

    y

    s

    o

    f

    ow

     

    e

    o

    v

    r

    d

     

    Z

     

    N

    m

    E

    o

    v

    R

    d

    B

    n

    S

    a

    M

    i

    c

    o

    c

    A

    a

    C

    m

    s

    d

    e

    1

    b

    a

    p

    w

    b

    a

    g

    a

    e

    K

    S

    C

    2

    b

    a

    p

    w

    p

    p

    a

    s

    o

    g

    a

    c

    y

    a

    n

    N

    K

    O

    C

    b

    a

    d

    3

    b

    a

    p

    w

    p

    p

    a

    s

    g

    a

    c

    y

    a

    n

    K

    2

    O

    ,

    C

    O

    3

    2

    b

    a

    g

    a

    e

    u

    e

    e

    4

    b

    a

    p

    w

    p

    p

    a

    b

    d

    n

    m

    e

    a

    g

    a

    c

    y

    a

    n

    N

    K

    O

    C

    b

    a

    g

    a

    e

    u

    e

    e

    b

    a

    p

    w

    r

    o

    m

    w

    b

    a

    d

    N

    K

    O

    C

    O

    3

    2

    C

    5

    s

    m

    e

    s

    n

    e

    b

    b

    a

    c

    n

    N

    D

    K

    O

    6

    s

    m

    e

    s

    n

    e

    b

    p

    p

    a

    s

    r

    e

    n

    N

    K

    O

    N

    b

    a

    c

    n

    u

    e

    e

    7

    s

    m

    e

    s

    n

    e

    b

    p

    p

    a

    b

    d

    n

    m

    e

    a

    r

    e

    n

    N

    D

    C

    S

    O

    0

    5

    H

    b

    a

    c

    n

    u

    e

    e

    8

    s

    m

    e

    d

    e

    b

    b

    a

    p

    a

    e

    e

    s

    N

    N

    K

    O

    9

    s

    m

    e

    d

    e

    b

    p

    p

    a

    b

    d

    n

    m

    e

    a

    r

    e

    n

    N

    N

    S

    O

    N

    N

    b

    a

    p

    a

    e

    e

    s

    u

    e

    e

    1

    c

    o

    a

    e

    su

    w

    e

    g

    a

    a

    N

    C

    su

    o

    1

    c

    o

    a

    e

    su

    p

    p

    a

    s

    r

    e

    n

    N

    C

    su

    o

    N

    C

    w

    e

    g

    a

    a

    u

    e

    e

     

    o

      m

     

    Zc O

    m

     

    z t

    )

    m

     

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    7/24

    F

    G

    .

    4

    P

    p

    b

    m

    b

    r

    m

    e

    a

    o

    b

     

    e

    t

    o

    r

    g

    b

    a

    p

    w

    s

    n

    e

    b

    s

    m

    o

    e

    p

    w

    d

    e

    b

    s

    m

    o

    e

    p

    w

    a

    4

    %

     

    d

    m

    e

     

    o

    1

    b

    1

    8

    p

    p

    a

     

    b

    o

    m

    )

    6

    b

    2

    8

    p

    p

    o m<

    m I

    D

    m m

    0   I x "  

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    8/24

    c  

    o

     

    T

    A

    B

    L

    3

    A

    y

    s

    o

    d

    m

    i

    e

    r

    d

    E

    o

    v

    R

    d

    B

    n

    M

    i

    c

    o

    c

    N

    u

    m

    b

    0

    S

    a

    D

    a

    m

    a

    A

    p

    a

    C

    m

    p

    s

    d

    e

     

    ~ Z

    1 1 1

    1 1 1

    1 1

    2

    2

    a

    m

    m

    o

    a

    2

    g

    a

    a

    2

    3

    A

    n

    p

    y

    w

    o

    8

    b

    2

    8

    c

    a

    e

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    p

    b

    a

    d

    2

     

    8

    s

    e

    f

    o

    d

    o

    U

    -

    h

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    a

    m

    m

    o

    a

    g

    a

    n

    4

    m

    o

    s

    c

    m

    p

    6

    m

    o

    s

    c

    m

    p

    7

    m

    o

    s

    c

    m

    p

    4

    2

    b

    6

    n

    w

    o

    s

    h

    e

    e

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    4

    3

    A

    n

    p

    y

    w

    o

    9

    b

    4

    n

    c

    a

    e

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    4

    3

    n

    o

    m

     

    u

    a

    n

    c

    a

    e

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

     

    8

    p

    y

    w

    o

    u

    e

    e

    4

    4

    c

    p

    a

    8

    p

    y

    w

    o

    9

    b

    2

    8

    c

    a

    e

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    p

    4

    c

    o

    h

    a

    8

    p

    y

    w

    o

    9

    b

    3

    n

    c

    a

    e

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    u

    e

    e

    4

    4

    c

    n

    e

    a

    6

    b

    3

    n

    c

    a

    e

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

     

    8

    p

    y

    w

    o

    E

    G

    D

    N

    ,

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    H

    ,

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    S

    p

    p

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    H

    ,

    N

    O

    3

    N

    aN

    O

    3

    N

    O

    N

    O

    2

    N

    a

    N

    O

    .

    N

    a

    O

    ,

    n

    N

    a

    C

    3

    n

    C

    N

    S

    E

    G

    D

    N

    ,

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    C

    N

    H

    4

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    S

    p

    p

    E

    G

    D

    N

    ,

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    C

    N

    H

    4

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    S

    p

    p

    E

    G

    D

    N

    ,

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    C

    N

    H

    4

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    S

    p

    p

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    a

    N

    O

    ~

    S

    O

    z

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    C

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    O

    ,

    E

    G

    D

    N

    ,

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    C

    N

    H

    4

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    N

    O

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    N

    O

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    C

    N

    a

    N

    O

    ,

    N

    a

    O

    ,

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    N

    O

    1 Z

    f O

     

    f

    O

     

    C

    )

    I

    N

     

    Z O

     

    m

     

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    9/24

    2

    4

    b

    2

    4

    2

    4

    b

    2

    4

    2

    6

    2

    6

    2

    6

    2

    7

    3

    7

    c

    g

    a

    n

    3

    6

    3

    6

    d

     

    =

    0

    2

    o

    5

    ~

    s

    c

    c

    N

    o

    w

    r

    a

    p

    9

    b

    1

    o

    m

     

    w

    o

    b

    a

    b

    e

    e

    p

    p

    a

    9

    b

    1

    o

    m

     

    p

    p

    a

    9

    b

    1

    o

    m

     

    a

    A

    -

    n

    p

    y

    w

    o

    g

    u

    m

     

    w

    a

    b

    d

    a

    2

    b

    6

    n

    w

    o

    g

    u

    m

     

    w

    a

    b

    d

    a

    p

    a

    c

    m

    o

    d

    n

    %

    -

    n

    s

    e

    ~

    ~

    n

    s

    e

    Y

    8

    n

    s

    e

    9

    b

    6

    n

    c

    a

    e

    s

    h

    e

    e

    s

    h

    e

    e

    f

    a

    m

    e

    a

    o

    s

    h

    e

    e

    f

    a

    m

    e

    a

    o

    s

    h

    e

    e

    9

    b

    5

    V

    ~

    n

    c

    a

    e

    s

    h

    e

    e

    s

    h

    e

    e

    8

    b

    1

    n

    d

    8

    b

    1

    n

    d

    8

    b

    5

    n

    c

    a

    e

    p

    a

    e

    o

    y

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    b

    a

    d

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    u

    e

    e

    6

    %

     

    p

    g

    u

    m

     

    g

    u

    m

     

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    m

    o

    s

    c

    m

    p

    w

    h

    e

    c

    y

    a

    n

    N

    H

    ,

    N

    0

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    O

    4

    p

    a

    e

    N

    a

    N

    O

    ~

    N

    a

    O

    ,

    h

    n

    N

    a

    C

    ~

    n

    a

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    O

    ,

    n

    N

    a

    C

    3

    n

    a

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    a

    O

    4

    n

    N

    a

    C

    O

    3

    n

    a

    E

    G

    D

    N

    ,

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    C

    ,

    N

    H

    ,

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    N

    O

    ~

    S

    O

    2

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    C

    ,

    i

    N

    H

    4

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    N

    O

    ~

    S

    O

    ,

    2

    (

    g

    u

    m

    )

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    C

    ,

    N

    H

    ~

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    O

    4

    C

    N

    S

    ,

    g

    u

    m

    )

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    H

    ,

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    O

    4

    (

    C

    N

    S

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    N

    a

    O

    ,

    E

    G

    D

    N

    ,

    N

    G

    ,

    N

    C

    ,

    N

    a

    N

    O

    3

    p

    p

    B

    a

    S

    O

    ~

    N

    O

    ~

    N

    O

    ~

    N

    a

    C

    O

    ~

    H

    z

    O

    ,

    B

    a

    d

    N

    o

    w

    r

    a

    p

    1

    b

    sh

    I

     

    1

    1

     

    1

    z

    Q

     

    m

     

    oZ

    m

     

    X

     

    w

    m

     

    1 _

    w

    m

     

    o

    6 r

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    10/24

    4 o

    T

    A

    B

    L

    4

    A

    y

    s

    o

    p

    a

    c

    e

    o

    v

    r

    d

     

    Z

     

    o

    m

     

    z o

    N

    u

    m

    b

    E

    o

    v

    R

    d

    B

    n

    S

    a

    D

    a

    m

    a

    M

    i

    c

    o

    c

    A

    p

    a

    C

    o

    m

    p

    s

    d

    e

    3

    C

    w

    h

    e

    p

    a

    c

    p

    a

    c

    z

    R

    D

    X

     

    3

    C

    3

    A

    n

    p

    y

    w

    o

    1

    b

    9

    n

    c

    a

    e

    b

    a

    d

    n

    v

    3

    C

    3

    8

    n

    s

    e

    7

    b

    3

    8

    c

    a

    e

    b

    a

    d

    n

    v

    3

    C

    P

    N

     

    b

    e

    3

    8

    n

    s

    e

    5

    b

    8

    n

    c

    a

    e

    b

    a

    d

    R

    D

    X

     

    8

    p

    y

    w

    o

    p

    a

    s

    h

    e

    e

    b

    a

    d

    R

    X

    ,

    P

    N

     

    1

    n

    o

    m

     

    c

    g

    3

    d

    o

    n

    c

    d

    w

    h

    e

    p

    a

    c

    P

    N

     

    3

    d

    o

    n

    c

    d

    s

    o

    t

    e

    o

    a

    p

    a

    c

    w

    r

    a

    n

    v

    0

    4

    n

    d

    a

    m

    e

    e

    3

    d

    o

    n

    c

    d

    a

    u

    m

    i

    n

    m

    -

    h

    h

    c

    m

    e

    a

    a

    w

    o

    w

    h

    e

    b

    o

    m

     

    c

    d

    P

    N

     

    0

    2

    n

    d

    a

    m

    e

    e

    w

    o

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    11/24

    BEVERIDGE ET AL ON EXPLOSIVE RESIDUES 4 4

    FIG. 5 Black powder pipe bomb debris.

    granules of unreacted black powder had no t been recognized then identi fication of the

    explosive would have to have been based on the reaction product only.

    The single-base smokeless powder consisted of NC cylinders coated with graphite and

    DNT to control burning. It also contained a small amount of potassium sulfate additive.

    Numbers 5 through 7 in Table 2 summarize the analyses. Figure 7 illustrates the effect

    of a cap-initiated pipe bom b in a room corner. No wall push was observed unreacted

    explosive was thrown aro und the room and a devastating fire was started within the

    wall.

    The double-base smokeless powder consisted of graphite-coated NG and NC plus a

    small amount of potassium sulfate additive. Numbers 8 and 9 in Table 2 summarize the

    analyses. A flame-in itiated 0.5-1b charge in a room showed wall push blew out the

    windows but left intact a light bulb in the ceiling. Of twelve fragments recovered from

    the crater and walls five bore unreacted explosive. All fragments showed fresh rusty

    areas and traces of resinous residue. NG and NC were identified by IR and TLC.

    Aqueous extraction gave a low yield of con taminants in which sulfate was identified by

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    12/24

    C

     

    n

      -

    n

     9 m

     

    z m

     

    z

    0

    I

    F

    G

     

    6

    B

    l

    a

    p

    w

    d

    r

    d

    R

     

    s

    m

     

    o

    a

    e

    K

    2

    K

    N

    0

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    13/24

    BEVERIDGE ET AL ON EXPLOSIVE RESID UES 4 4

    FIG.

    7 Single base smokeless powder pipe bomb debris.

    IR and sodium by spect rography. Spot tes ts showed ni tra te ni tr ite amm onium and

    chloride. The X-ray powder pat tern was not identif ied. The danger of rel iance on

    chemical tests is apparent since if analysis consisted only of TLC and of spot tests for

    sodium ni tra te and amm onium then in the absence of unreacted explos ive the

    examiner could be misled tow ard dynam ite; that is the analysis wou ld appear to be NG

    NC NH § Na and NO3- of which three are the resul t of contam inat ion f rom the

    surround ings. The range o f instrumental analysis applied in Fig. 1 should p revent this

    type of error since all dyna mite aque ous extracts were identif ied by X-ray powde r

    diffract ion.

    Chlorate/sugar produced a f i rebal l and explosion on f lame ini t iat ion. Unreacted

    explosive was recovered. Pipe fragments bore brown gummy residue and fresh rust

    spots. Analyses are summarized in Table 2 Nos. 10 and 11. Extract ion yielded

    unreacted sugar and sodium chlora te ident if ied by IR and the sodium chlor ide product

    ident i f ied by polar iz ing microscopy and X-ray powder di f f ract ion. S ince sodium

    chlorate is also isotropic the polarizing micr oscop e was well sui ted to this analysis.

    Potassium chlorate is anisotrooic.

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    14/24

      JOURNALOF FORENSIC SCIENCES

    Hi g h Ex p l o s i v e s

    D y n a m i t e - - D y n a m i t e i s t h e e x p l o si v e c la s s m o s t c o m m o n l y e n c o u n t e r e d i n b o m b

    i n c i d e n t s . T h e c l a s s es o f d y n a m i t e u s e d i n th i s s t u d y w e r e g e l a t in ( N G , N C ) , a m m o n i a

    ( N G , N H , N O 3 ) , a n d a m m o n i a g e l a ti n ( N G , N C , N H , N O 3 ) . I n o u r s e rv ic e a r e a a n d e l se -

    w h e r e , n i t r o g l y c e r i n e d y n a m i t e s c o n t a i n u p t o 85o7o e t h y l e n e g l y c o l d i n i t r a t e ( E G D N )

    w i t h th e n i t r o g l y c e r in e . T h e E G D N d e p r e s s e s t h e f r e e z i n g p o i n t o f t h e N G , w h i c h le s s e n s

    t h e ri s k o f d y n a m i t e b e c o m i n g u n s ta b l e t h r o u g h f re e z in g a n d t h a w i n g . T h e E G D N is

    m o r e v o l a t il e t h a n N G a n d i s t h e ba s is o f d y n a m i t e s n i f f e rs [1 10]. T h e d y n a m i t e i n

    t h i s s t u d y c o n t a i n e d s o d i u m n i t r a t e a n d s u l f u r f o r o x y g e n b a l a n c e , e x c e p t f o r t h e

    g e l a t i n w h i c h d i d n o t c o n t a i n e l e m e n t a l s u l f u r . N o n e o f th e s e d y n a m i t e s c o n t a i n e d D N T ,

    b u t i t i s a c o m m o n a d d i t i v e .

    C o o k

    [12]

    p r e d i c t s t h a t d y n a m i t e w i t h s o d i u m n i t r a t e s h o u l d y i e l d s o d i u m c a r b o n a t e

    a n d t h a t i n t h e p r e s e n c e o f s u l f u r , c o p r o d u c t s m a y i n c l u d e s o d i u m s u l f i d e , s u l f i t e , a n d

    s u l f a t e , d e p e n d i n g o n t h e o x y g e n b a l a n c e . F o r t h e a m m o n i a g e l a t i n s , c a l c u l a t e d

    p r o d u c t s a r e p r i m a r i l y s o d i u m s u l f a t e a n d s o d i u m c a r b o n a t e i n a ra t i o i n w h i c h th e

    s o d i u m c a r b o n a t e p e r c e n t a g e i n c r e a s e s a s t h e e x p l o s i v e p e r c e n t a g e s t r e n g t h d e c r e a s es [19].

    T h e s e d a t a p o i n t t o T L C a n d X - r a y d i f f r a c t i o n a s p r i m e i d e n t i f ic a t i o n t e c h n iq u e s .

    F o l l o w i n g t h e T L C w o r k o f J e n k i n s a n d Y a l l o p [ 9] , t h is s t u d y c o m m e n c e d w i th b e n z e n e

    e l u en t , b u t th i s d id n o t c l e a n ly s e p a r a t e E G D N a n d N G . G o o d s e p a r a t i o n w a s ac h i e ve d

    b y b e n z e n e / h e x a n e e l u e n t [29] a n d t h i s s y s te m s u p e r s e d e d b e n z e n e .

    T h e r e s u l ts o f a c o m p a r a t i v e s t u d y o f T L C s o l v e n t s y s te m s o n 2 5 0 - ~ m s i l ic a g e l G

    p l a t e s a r e s h o w n i n T a b l e 5 .

    R f

    v a l u e s a r e s i m i l a r t o t h o s e r e p o r t e d b y J e n k i n s a n d

    Y a l l o p [9 ] o n 2 5 0 -/a m s i l i c a g e l G , b u t a r e a b o u t t w o t i m e s l e ss t h a n R f v a l ue s r e p o r t e d

    b y H o f f m a n n a n d B y a ll [10] o n 2 00 -/a m s i l i c a g e l G . T h i s d i s c r e p a n c y i s p r e s u m a b l y d u e

    t o t h e d i f f e r e n c e in t h i c k n e s s o f t h e s i l i c a g e l l a y e r a n d u n d e r l i n e s t h e n e c e s s i ty f o r

    r u n n i n g f r e s h s ta n d a r d s w i t h e v e ry T L C . T a b l e 5 in d i c at e s t h a t c h l o r o f o r m / a c e t o n e

    ( 1 / 1 ) i s t h e b e s t s y s te m f o r in i ti a l T L C a n a ly s i s o f a n u n k n o w n . A m m o n i u m a n d n i t ra t e

    T A B L E 5- -T L C systems em ployed fo r explosive analysis.

    TLC Systems

    Benzene: Xylene: CC I,: Aceto ne:

    Hexane Hexane C2H4C 12 CHCL

    Explosive Benzene 1 1 3:2 4:1 1 1 Eth ano l

    EG DN a 0.23 0.31 0.23

    NG a 0.38 0.17 0.21 0.16 0.65 0.64

    NC a 0 0 0 0 0 0

    PE TN a 0.37 0.15 0.21 0.12 0.71 0.60

    RDX a 0 0 0 0 0.46 0.49

    DN T b 0.37 0.17 0.22 0.20 0.63 0.65

    TN T b 0.40 0.20 0.30 0.15 0.67 0.61

    NO3 - c . 0.57

    N H + d 0 .1 3

    a NaO H/G riess , 250-~m sil ica gel G.

    b TiC IJD M A B, 250-~tm sil ica gel G.

    c Ph2N H/H~ SO,, 250-1~m sitica gel G.

    dE tOH /N ess ler , 250-:~m silica gel G.

    * NaNO 3, K NO~, NH~NO~.

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    15/24

    BEVERIDGE ET AL ON EXPLOSIVE RE SIDU ES 5

    i o n s m i g r a t e a t d i f f e r e n t r a t e s a n d s o d i u m , p o t a s s i u m , a n d a m m o n i u m n i t r a t e s a r e n o t

    d i s t i n g u i s h a b l e b y d e v e lo p in g n i t r a t e o n ly . T h i s h a s b e e n o v e r lo o k e d i n p r e v io u s

    p u b l i c a t i o n s o n e x p l o s i v e r e s i d u e a n a l y s i s . A m m o n i u m i o n w a s c o n v e n i e n t l y d e v e l o p e d

    u s in g t h e N e s s l er r e a g e n t [13].

    T h u s , t o c h a r a ct e r iz e d y n a m i t e b y T L C , a m i n i m u m o f t h re e s y s te m s w a s e m p l o y e d :

    b e n z e n e / h e x a n e w i t h N a O H / G r i e s s f o r E G D N , N G , a n d N C ; e t h a n o l w i th P h 2 N H /

    H ~ S O , f o r N O 3 - ; a n d e t h a n o l/ N e s s le r f o r N H , + .

    T a b l e 3 s u m m a r i z e s t h e r e s u l t s o f 1 8 d y n a m i t e e x p lo s io n s . U n le s s o th e r w i s e n o t e d ,

    t h e c h a r g e w a s o n e 8 b y 1 8 8 s t ic k . T h e r e su l t s a r e d is c u s s e d b y c l as s .

    A m m o n i a D y n a m i t e E x p l o si o n s w e r e c o n d u c t e d w i th o n e 8 b y 1 8 8 s ti c k o n w o o d

    a n d o n e d e t e r i o r a t e d 8 b y 1 8 8 s t i c k o n st ee l. T h e r e su l t s a r e s u m m a r i z e d i n T a b l e 3 ,

    N o s . 1 3 a n d 1 4, a n d c l e a r l y d e m o n s t r a t e t h e c o m p le x i t y o f e x p lo s iv e r e s id u e a n a ly si s .

    I n b o th c a s e s a w h i t e c r y s t a l l i n e r e s id u e w a s o b s e r v e d , b u t t h i s w a s n o t r e c o g n i z a b l e a s

    u n r e a c t e d d y n a m i t e . A c e t o n e e x t r a c t i o n a n d T L C i d e n t i f i e d N G i n t h e w o o d c r a t e r

    f r a g m e n t s b u t n e i t h e r o n t h e w o o d c r a t e r s u r r o u n d i n g s n o r o n t h e s t e e l . A q u e o u s

    e x t r a c t i o n y i e ld e d w h i t e c r y s t a l s , t h e I R s p e c t r u m o f w h ic h s h o w e d th e p r e s e n c e o f

    s u l fa t e a n d c a r b o n a t e p r o d u c t s i n a d d i t io n t o u n r e a c t e d n i t r at e . T h e r e la t iv e p r o p o r t i o n s

    in t h e I R v a r i e d a s s h o w n b e lo w , w h e r e s i s s t r o n g , w i s w e a k , a n d m i s m e d iu m .

    w o o d c r a t e r f r a g m e n t s 8042- S) C O 3 2 - ( w ) N O 3 - ( w )

    w o o d c r a t e r s u r r o u n d i n g s S O , 2 - ( m ) C O 3 2 - ( w ) N O 3 - ( s )

    s te el S O , 2 - ( s ) C O 3 2 - ( m ) N O 3 - ( m )

    X - r a y p o w d e r d i f f r a c t i o n o f t h e m i x t u r e [30] i d e n t i f i e d t h e p r o d u c t f r o m t h e w o o d a s

    N a ~ S O , ( I ) a n d t h a t f r o m s t e e l a s s o d iu m c a r b o n a t e s u l f a t e ( s e e T a b l e 6 ) . T h e I R

    s p e c t r u m o f s o d iu m c a r b o n a t e s u l f a t e i s i l l u s t r a t e d i n F ig . 8 ( s t e e l r e s id u e ) a n d t h e

    m o r p h o l o g y i n F ig . 9 . T h e s e p r o d u c t s a r e f u r t h e r d i sc u s se d i n A p p e n d i x B . T h e n i t ra t e

    in e a c h c a s e w a s i d e n t if i e d a s t h e u n r e a c t e d s o d iu m s a l t b y X - r a y p o w d e r d i f f r a c t i o n

    a n d t h e p o l a r i z i n g m i c r o s c o p e . N o a m m o n i u m i o n w a s f o u n d i n t h e w o o d d e b r i s a n d

    was no ted on ly by spo t te s t sc reen ing in the s tee l ex t rac t .

    T h a t t h e s a m e e x p lo s iv e g iv e s d i f f e r e n t p r o d u c t s o n u n c o n f in e d d e to n a t i o n i s b e s t

    e x p l a i n e d b y t h e d e t e r i o r a t i o n o f o n e s t i c k . T h e p r o d u c t c o m p o s i t i o n i s a p p a r e n t l y

    d e t e r m i n e d b y t h e m o l e r a t io o f C O 3 2 - : S O , 2 - . T h e s e r e s ul ts s h o w t h e m a j o r d r a w b a c k

    t o s o l v e n t e x t r a c t i o n i n t h a t s o d i u m s u l f a t e a n d s o d i u m c a r b o n a t e m i g h t h a v e b e e n

    p r e s e n t i n d e p e n d e n t ly , b u t a r e i s o l a t e d f r o m a c o m p le x a q u e o u s s y s t e m a s a s o l i d

    s o lu t i o n ( s e e A p p e n d ix B) .

    Am mo nia Gelat in Dyn am i te The v e lo c i t y o f 4 0~ F o r c i t e i s a r o u n d 7 0 0 0 f e e t p e r

    s e c o n d ( f p s ) u n c o n f in e d a n d 1 3 ,0 0 0 f p s c o n f in e d . V e lo c i t i e s a r e p r o p o r t i o n a t e ly h ig h e r

    f o r 6 0 ~ a n d 7 50 70 . T h e v a r i a t i o n o f v e lo c i t y w i th c o n f in e m e n t i s t y p i c a l o f g e l a t in

    d y n a m i t e s [31]. F ig u r e 1 0 s h o w s t h e i n c r ea s e d s h a t t e r i n g e f f e c t o f a n 8 b y 1 8 8 s t ic k

    o f ex p lo s iv e o n 9 0 p ly w o o d a s t h e v e lo c i t y i n c r ea s e s f r o m 6 0 0 0 t o 2 5 ,0 0 0 f p s . T h e

    exp los ives il lu s t ra ted w ere 20 , 40 , and 60070 dyn am i te , and C4 , respec t ive ly (Tab le 3 ,

    N o s . 1 3, 1 7 , 2 6 ; T a b l e 4 , N o . 3 4 ) . T e s ts i n re s id e n ti a l p r e m i s e s s h o w e d a m a r k e d c o n t r a s t

    t o t h e l o w e x p lo s iv e s . W a l l s w e r e s h a t t e r e d , a s o p p o s e d t o p u s h e d , a n d t h e r e v e r s e b l a s t

    b r o u g h t w i n d o w g la s s b a c k i n t o t h e r o o m s . F i g u re 11 sh o w s d a m a g e c a u s e d b y t w o

    s t ic k s o f u n c o n f in e d 4 00 70 F o r c i t e i n a 9 b y 1 2 - f t r o o m ( T a b l e 3 , N o . 2 2 ) . W h e n

    c o n f in e d i n p ip e s , s o m e p ip e f r a g m e n t s p a s s e d t h r o u g h s e v e r a l w a i l s a n d d o o r s .

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    16/24

     

    Z o

     

    m

     

    m

     

    z 0 c Q

    m

     

    z

    0

    m

     

    F

    G

     

    8

    2

     

    d

    m

    e

    R

    s

    p

    r

    u

    m

    o

    a

    e

    r

    a

    r

    o

    m

    s

    e

    o

    u

    m

    c

    b

    e

    s

    u

    a

    e

    N

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    17/24

    BEVERIDGE ET AL ON EXPLOSIVE RESIDUES 7

    FIG.

    9--S odi um carbonate sulfa te in aqueous extrac t o f explosive residue (crossed polars,

    original magnification x25 0).

    FIG. lO--Damage by a unit charge o f 20, 40, and 60 dynam ite and C4.

    Numbers 16 through 30 in Table 3 summarize the test explosions of this class. In

    only three instances Nos. 18, 20, 26) was unreacted explosive recognized in the debris.

    The confined explosives, Nos. 23 through 25, were distinguished from the unconfined

    explosives by the composition of the reaction product as determined by X-ray powder

    diffraction. The confined explosives gave sodium carbonate sulfate, whereas the uncon-

    fined gave Na~SO, I). Unlike 20070 stumping powder, unconfined Forcite residue

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    18/24

      8

    JO U R N L O F FO R EN SIC SC IEN C ES

    TABLE

    6--X-ray pow der d iffraction data o f sodium carbonate sulfates.

    Na2SO,(I) a

    d .~ I/Io

    2Na2SO, 9Na2CO3 b 2Na2SO,9Na2CO3 c (Na2SO,)I_ n(Na2CO3)n d

    d A I/Io d A I/Io d A I/Io

    4.60 10 4.60 20

    3.87 63 3.85 90

    3.56 40 3.55 70

    3.88

    3.78

    3.51

    2.82 100 2.80 100 2.78

    2.66 100 2.66 100 2.64

    2.58

    2.30 2 2.30 10

    2.19 8 2.18 50

    2.13 1

    1 9 3 4 0 1 9 2 9 0

    1 78 8 1 77 50

    1 5 7 1 0 1 5 6 4 0

    1 5 4 7 1 5 3 2 0

    9.20 10

    4.51 20

    70

    80 3.798 70

    70 3.530 50

    3.444 10

    3.076 20

    100 2.795 100

    70 2.645 60

    80 2.587 60

    2.479 5

    2.348 10

    2.302 5

    2.13 30 2.149 20

    2.10 30 2.106 1

    1.97 10 1.980 10

    1.93 40 1.932 30

    1.89 40 1.903 30

    1.75 30 1.765 20

    1.740 5

    1 6 2 5

    1 5 0

    10

    a ASTM Powder Diffraction File No. 1-0990 [27].

    b Ramsdell

    [33].

    c ASTM Powder Diffraction File No. 2-0840 [27].

    dThis study.

    showed no carbonat e in the IR (Fig. 1 2). The presence of some carbona te was

    inferred, however, fr om effervescence with acid. There was insufficient sodium nitrate

    in the confined explosive residue for identification in the X-ray powder pattern, but it

    was recognizable in the bulk sodium carbonate sulphate matrix by orthoscopic and

    conoscopic observation with the polarizing microscope (Nos. 23 and 24).

    Sodium nitrate was identified by X-ray powder diffraction in all unconfined explosions

    and NG was identified by TLC in approximately three-quarters of the explosions.

    However, ammonium nitrate and NC were detected in only 47 and 40% of the tests,

    respectively. In the TLC systems tested, N C h ad an Ry value of 0, in com mon with many

    solvent-extracted contaminants which often develop a yellow color with Griess reagent

    and possibly mask NC. Where a TLC system was used which separates EGDN and NG,

    (Nos. 17, 18, 22 through 28, 30) EGDN was found in only one-third of the cases in

    which NG was identified. This cautions against complete reliance on a dynamite sniffer

    to detect residue.

    IR prior to TLC of ether and acetone extracts detected explosive components in 50%

    of the tests, as opposed to 80% for TLC. In some TLC analyses, contamination reduced

    the

    R f

    value of explosive compon ents relative to standards, and in these cases IR aided

    interpretation.

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    19/24

    BEVERtDGE ET AL ON EXPLOSIVE RESID UES 9

    FIG. 11--40

    Forcite debris two sticks, unconfined).

    No consistent difference in residue composition was found between Forcite 40, 60, or

    75070, notwithstanding their calculated products being in varying proportions. The

    complexity of the Na2SO4/Na2CO3 aqueous system complicates this issue. For 60 and

    7507o Forcite the yield of sulfate product was minor compared to sodium nitrate, but

    as No. 16 shows, this is not a consistent difference from 4007o Forcite .

    Explosions of 7507o Forcite with and without wrapper paper (Nos. 29 and 30) showed

    little difference in products, although CNS- was detected with paper only. CNS- was

    also a product of black powder (No. 4), 20070 dynamite (No. 14), and 6007o Forcite (No.

    28).

    The effect of contamination was not serious, although sodium chloride of unknown

    origin was often noted. Gypsum plaster in particular was noted in some X-ray powder

    patterns but did not prevent identification of product sulfate in No. 28. Figure 13 shows

    the IR spectrum of the aqueous extract from No. 27, 60~ Forcite on gypsum wall-

    board, in which sulfate product is identified by a peak at 615 cm -l . Its low yield

    precluded further identification from the X-ray powder pattern.

    In summary, out of 15 explosions of ammonia-gelatin dynamite, 5 residues could be

    classed as being from ammonia-gelatin dynamite (Nos. 18, 20, 26 through 28), 2 from

    ammonia dynamite (Nos. 22, 29), 1 from gelatin dynamite (No. 17) , and 7 from

    dynamite (Nos. 16, 19, 21, 23-25, 30).

    G e l a t i n - - O n e pound of a 5-1b stick o f seismic dynamite was shaped and detonated

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    20/24

    F

    G

     

    1

    4

     

    F

    e

    u

    n

    R

    s

    p

    r

    u

    m

     

    o

    a

    e

    r

    a

    r

    o

    m

     

    c

    p

    N

    O

    ,

    1

    a

    N

    0

      Z  -

    n

    :

    7

    m

     

    Z

    0

    C o

    m

     

    z 0 m

     

    F

    G

     

    1

    6

     

    F

    e

    u

    n

    d

    e

    a

    o

    o

    s

    u

    a

    e

    b

    R

    a

    y

    s

    [

    N

    C

    2

    H

    2

    (

    c

    am

    i

    n

    s

    o

    u

    m

     

    s

    u

    a

    e

    p

    o

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    21/24

    BEVERIDGE ET L ON EXPLOSIVE RESIDUES 45

    o n s tee l Tab le 3 , No . 32) . A h eav y wh i te c rys ta l l ine res idue was la rge ly sod ium

    carbona te . Th is res idue cou ld no t be c lassed as be ing f rom ge la t in dynami te s ince NC was

    n o t r e c o v e r e d , b u t t h e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f s o d i u m c a r b o n a t e i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e d y n a m i t e

    c o n t a in e d n o e l e m e n ta l s u l f u r a n d a g a in s t re s se s t h e v a lu e o f p r o d u c t i d e n t i f i c a t io n b y

    in s t r u m e n ta l a n a ly s i s . T h e p r e s e n c e o f b a r i u m wa s s h o wn s p e c t r o g r a p h i c a l l y i n t h e

    in s o lu b l e m a te r i a l , wh ic h e m p h a s i z e s t h e v a lu e o f s y s t e m a t i c a n a ly s i s.

    Plas t ic C 4 - - T h e v e l o ci t y o f C 4 is a r o u n d 2 5 ,0 0 0 f p s. C 4 w a s d e t o n a t e d b y e i th e r

    b l a s t i n g c a p o r d e to n a t i n g c o r d b o o s t e r . No u n r e a c t e d e x p lo s iv e wa s o b s e r v e d i n t h e

    c h a r a c t e r i s t i c b l a c k d e p o s i t . T h e a n a ly s e s a r e s u m m a r i z e d i n T a b l e 4 , No s . 3 4 t o 3 6 . I n

    o n l y o n e o u t o f t h r e e ex p l o si o n s N o . 3 6 ) w a s R D X i d e n ti f ie d b y T L C . O n o n e p i e ce

    o f d e b r is , P E T N f r o m d e t o n a t i n g c o r d b o o s t e r w a s a ls o i de n ti fi e d.

    D e t o n a t i n g C o r d T h e

    d e t o n a t i n g c o r d w a s c h a r g e d w i th P E T N . I n o n e o f tw o

    e x p lo s io n s T a b l e 4 , No s . 3 8 a n d 3 9 ) P E T N wa s i d e n t if i e d b y T L C. I n b o th c a s e s

    t r a c e s o f wr a p p e r we r e r e c o v e r e d .

    General

    T h e a n a ly t i c a l s c h e m e in F ig . 1 wa s d e r iv e d f r o m p r a c t i c a l e x p e r i en c e a n d t h e c h e m ic a l

    l i te r a tu r e a n d u s e s t h e i n s t ru m e n t s r o u t i n e ly u s ed i n Ro y a l Ca n a d i a n M o u n te d

    P o l i c e R C M P ) l a b o r a t o ri e s . I t is n o t a n a b s o l u t e a n d i s a d a p t e d a s c o n d i t io n s d e m a n d .

    F o r e x a m p le , e t h e r wo u ld n o t b e u s e d t o e x t r a c t r e s id u e f r o m a n e n g in e b lo c k . S im i l a r l y ,

    i f v o l a t il e l iq u id s s u c h a s n i t r o b e n z e n e o r g a s o l i n e we r e s u s p e c te d , t h e n h ig h v a c u u m

    t e c h n iq u e s , v a p o r p h a s e I R , a n d g a s c h r o m a t o g r a p h y w o u l d b e a p p li e d . T h e t e s t

    e x p l os i o ns w e r e p a r t o f a s e rie s o f w o r k s h o p s e m i n a rs r u n b y o u r l a b o r a t o r y f o r

    t r a in in g p u r p o s e s , a n d i n v o lv e d p o l ic e a n d f i re i n v e s ti g a to r s a n d I E D s p e ci a li s ts i n

    a d d i t i o n t o l a b o r a t o r y p e r s o n n e l .

    T h e a n a ly t i c a l r e s u l t s s h o w th a t t h e s c h e m e p e r m i t t e d c o r r e c t c l a s s i f i c a t i o n o f t h e

    e x p lo s iv e s , a l t h o u g h s u b c l a s s i f i c a t i o n o f d y n a m i t e wa s n o t a lwa y s a c h i e v e d . Un r e a c t e d

    e x p lo s iv e i n d e b r i s wa s r e c o g n i z e d b y m ic r o s c o p i c e x a m in a t i o n f o r m o s t o f t h e l o w

    e x p los iv es , f e w o f t h e d y n a m i t e s , a n d n o n e o f t h e p l a s ti c e x p lo s ive s . T h e v a lu e

    o f e x p lo s iv e p r o d u c t i d e n t i fi c a ti o n h a s b e e n d e m o n s t r a t e d a n d w i t hi n t h e a m m o n i a -

    g e l a t i n s e r i e s i t d i s t i n g u i s h e d c o n f in e d a n d u n c o n f in e d d y n a m i t e . Re s id u e c o m p o s i t i o n

    a n d d i s t r i b u t i o n w e r e n o t u n i f o r m a n d t h e m o s t c o m p r e h e n s i v e r e c o v e r i e s w e r e , n o t

    s u r p r i s i n g ly , m a d e f r o m th e c r a t e r a r e a , wh ic h r e c e iv e s a p o t e n t i a l h e m i s p h e r e o f b l a s t .

    T h e m o s t u se f u l te c h n i q u e s w e re m i c r o s c o p y , T L C , X - r a y p o w d e r d i f f r a c t io n , a n d

    in f r a r e d s p e c t r o s c o p y . T h e e m i s s io n s p e c t r o g r a p h r e p l a c e d s p o t t e s t s f o r m e ta l s . S p o t

    t e s ts p r o v id e d r a p id s c r e e n in g o f a h ig h y i e ld o f r e s id u e , b u t w e r e u s u a l l y re l e g a t e d t o

    c h e c k in g f o r c o m p o n e n t s m i s s e d b y t h e o th e r t e c h n iq u e s . A n e g a t iv e s p o t t e s t wa s o f t e n

    g iv e n m o r e we ig h t t h a n a p o s i t i v e t e s t . Ho we v e r , a s p o t t e s t s o lu t i o n a s a T L C d e v e lo p e r

    wa s v e r y u s e f u l a n d g r e a t l y e n h a n c e d s p e c if i ci t y .

    C a l c i u m s u l f a te b u i ld i n g p r o d u c t s , a m m o n i u m c h l o ri d e f r o m b a t te r ie s , s o d i u m

    c h l o r id e o f u n k n o w n o r i g in , a n d r e si ns w e r e th e c o n t a m i n a n t s m o s t o f t e n e n c o u n t e r e d

    b y s o lv e n t e x t r a c t i o n , b u t t h e y d id n o t p r e c lu d e r e s id u e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n i n t h e t e s t

    series.

    T a b l e 7 s u m m a r i z e s t h e c o m p o n e n t s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h i s s t u d y a n d i l l u s t r a t e s h o w

    r e s u l t s m a y b e i n t e r p r e t e d i n a n a l y s i s o f a n u n k n o w n . T h e s c h e m e h a s b e e n

    r o u t i n e ly a p p l i e d t o c a s e wo r k w i th s a t i s f a c to r y r e s u l t s ,

    u mm a r y

    A s c h e m e f o r s y s t e m a t i c a n a ly si s o f e x p lo s iv e r e s id u e s i s p r e s e n t e d a n d d e m o n s t r a t e d

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    22/24

    45 JOURNALOF FORENSIC SCIENCES

    T A B L E 7 Exp los ive co mp onen ts ident i fi ed and the ir sources .

    Com ponen t P robab le Or ig in

    NaNO3 dynamite

    NH4NO3 am mon ia dynam ite , b last ing slur ry

    KNO3 black powd er

    K~SO, black pow der, safety fuse, smokeless powders

    Na2CO3 dynamite

    Na~SO,( I ) dynamite

    (Na2SO4) 1 n(Na 2CO 3)n dynam ite

    NaC103 chlorate

    KC10, chlorate

    NaC1 NaC103, pe rm it ted dynam ite , contam inant

    KC1 KC103

    NH,C1 dry cell bat tery , pe rm it ted dynam ite

    NO 3- dynami te , b l ack powder

    NO 2- smokeless pow ders, dynam ite

    NH , + amm onia dynam ite , NH,NO3 blast ing slur ry , dry cell bat tery

    C NS - b l ack powder , dynami te

    CO32 - dyn am ite

    SO, z- dynam ite , b lack pow der , smokeless pow der

    C1- d ry ce ll ba t t e ry , pe rm i t t ed dynami te , con taminan t

    Na dynami te , con taminan t

    K b lack powder

    Ca con taminan t , dynami te

    B dynami te

    Ba dynamite

    Pb blasting cap residue

    A1 blasting cap casing

    Zn dry cell bat tery casing

    E G D N d y n a m i t e

    NG dynam ite , double-base smokeless powd er

    NC dyn am ite, single-base smokeless pow der

    TN T blast ing slur ry , mi l i tary dem ol i t ion charge

    DN T dyn am ite, single-base smokeless pow der

    PET N de tona ting co rd

    RDX C4 plastic explosive

    b y t e s t e x p l o s i o n s u s i n g c o m m e r c i a l , m i l i t a r y , a n d h o m e m a d e e x p l o s i v e s . T h e s i g n i f i -

    c a n c e o f r e a c t i o n p r o d u c t i d e n t i f i c a t i o n i s d e m o n s t r a t e d .

    A c k n o w l e d g m e n t s

    T h e a u t h o r s g r a t e fu l l y a c k n o w l e d g e th e c o o p e r a t i o n o f t h e B a se C o m m a n d e r a n d

    E O D t e a m o f t h e C a n a d i a n F o r c e s B a s e E d m o n t o n , t h e C h i e f C o n s t a b l e a n d B o m b

    D e t a i l o f t h e E d m o n t o n C i t y P o li c e , a n d t h e E x p l o s iv e s D i v i si o n o f C a n a d i a n I n d u s tr i e s

    L t d . , E d m o n t o n . W e th a n k t h e O f f ic e r i n C h a r g e o f t h e R C M P C r i m e D e t e c ti o n

    L a b o r a t o r y , E d m o n t o n f o r h is e n c o u r a g e m e n t o f t h is w o r k a n d t h e P h o t o g r a p h y

    S e c t i o n f o r t h e i r t e c h n i c a l a s s i s t a n c e .

    P P E ND I X

    G l o s s a r y o f E x p l o s i v e b b r e v i a t io n s a n d T e r m i n o l o g y

    B l a c k P o w d e r - - K N O J C / S , u su a ll y 7 5 /1 5 /1 0

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    23/24

    BEVERIDGE ET AL ON EXPLOSIVE RESIDU ES 4 5

    B l a s t i n g

    Cap--A small high explosive charge in a metal cylinder, used to initiate a bulk

    high explosive charge by means o f a shock wave; initiated electrically or by safety

    fuse

    Booster--A small high explosive charge used in conjunction with a blasting cap to ensure

    detonation of a bulk high explosive charge

    C--Carbon

    C4--Military code for plastic explosive based on RDX

    Chlorate/Sugar--Mechanical mixture of potassium or sodium chlorate and sugar

    D e t o n a t i n g Cord--A linear explosive consisting of a series of cylindrical wrappings with

    a central high explosive core, usually PETN

    DNT--2,4-dinitrotoluene, CTH6 NO2)2

    EGDN--Ethyleneglycol dinitrate, C2H4 ONO2)2

    Foreite --Trade name for dynamite Canadian Industries Ltd.)

    G e o g e l

    --Trade name for dynamite Canadian Industries Ltd.)

    H i g h

    Explosive--Explosive with a velocity of detonation greater than 3280 ft/s, for

    example, dynamite and plastic explosive

    IED--Improvised explosive device

    KNO3--Potassium nitrate

    Low Explosive--Explosive with a velocity of detonation less than 3280 ft/s , for

    example, black powder and pistol and rifle smokeless powder propellants

    NaNO3--Sodium nitrate

    NC--Nitrocellulose, variable formulation

    NG--Nitroglycerine, C3Hs ONO2)3

    NH,NO3--Ammonium nitrate

    PETN--Pentaerythri tol tetranitrate, C~Hs ONO2),

    Pla s t i c

    Explosive--High explosive plus plasticizer to enable shaping of the charge,

    for example, C4

    Po la ~ --Trade name for dynamite Canadian Industries Ltd.)

    RDX--Research and development explosive, cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine, C3H~N3 NO2)3

    S--Sulfur

    Safety Fuse--A series of cylindrical wrappings with a black powder core which burns at

    a constant rate, usually 40 s/ft

    S m o k e l e s s P o w d e r d o u b l e

    base)--Propellant based on nitrocellulose and nitroglycerine

    S m o k e l e s s P o w d e r s i n g le

    base)--Propellant based on nitrocellulose

    TNT--2,4,6-trinitrotoluene, C7H~ NO2)3

    P P E N D I X B

    Na2SO, I) is a metastable form of sodium sulfate which is stabilized by carbonate

    [ 2 7 3 2 ] . Sodium carbonate sulfate is reported as the rare mineral burkeite [27] and as a

    synthetic material [ 3 3 ] isolated from the sodium carbonate/sodium sulfate aqueous

    system [34] . Sodium carbonate sulfate was synthesized in our laboratory by evaporation

    of an aqueous solution of sodium sulfate and sodium carbonate, with a sodium

    carbonate mole ratio of 0.2 to 0.5. The X-ray powder pattern in this range showed

    neither precursor and, due to isomorphous exchange of carbonate and sulfate

    [ 3 3 ]

    showed no difference in d-spacings or intensities. Comparative d-spacings are given in

    Table 6 for variously reported sodium carbonate sulfates. Our synthetic material was

    indistinguishable from the carbonate sulfate residues noted in Table 3, Nos. 14 and

    23 through 25.

  • 8/15/2019 Systematic Analysis of Explosive Residues.pdf

    24/24

      5 J O U R N A LOF FORENSIC SCIENCES

    e f e r en ce s

    [ I ] Na t i ona l B omb D a t a C e n t e r , U .S . D e pa r t me n t o f Ju st ic e , F e de ra l B ure a u o f Inve s ti ga ti on ,

    P ica t inny Arsena l , Dover , N.J .

    [2] C anadian Bom b ~ a ta Cent re , Roy a l Can adian M ounted iPol ice , Ot tawa , Ont .

    [3] Blas t ing Cap Recogn i t ion and Ident i f ica t ion M an ua l , Publ ic Secur i ty Cente r , In te rna t iona l

    Assoc ia t ion of Chie fs of Pol ice , Ga i the rsbu rg , M d. , 1973.

    [4] In t ro duc t ion to Exp los ives , Publ ic Secur i ty Cente r , In te rna t iona l Assoc ia t ion of Chiefs of

    Police , Gaithersburg, Md., 1973.

    [5] Bo m b Inc ident M ana gem ent , Publ ic Secur i ty Cente r , In te rna t iona l Assoc ia t ion of Chie fs of

    Pol ice , Ga i the rsb urg , M d. , 1973.

    [6] Bo mb Inc ident Targe t Ana lys i s , Publ ic Secur ity Cente r , In te rna t iona l Assoc ia tion of Chiefs

    of Police , Ga i the rsb urg , M d. , 1973.

    [7] Tardif, H. P. and Sterl ing, T. S. ,

    J o u r n a l o f F o r e n s i c S c i en c e s,

    JFS CA , Vol. 12, No. 3, 1967,

    pp. 247-272.

    [8] Yallop, H. J . , J o u r n a l o f t h e F o r e n s i c S c i e n c e S o c ie ty , Vol. 5, No. 1, 1965, pp. 6 -10 .

    [ 9 Jenkins , R . and Ya l lop , H. J . , E x p l o s i v s t o f f e , No. 6, 1 970, pp. 139-141.

    [10] Hoffman, C. M. and Bya l l , E . B . , J o u r n a l o f F o r e n s i c S c i en c es , JFSCA, Vol . 19 , No. 1 ,

    Jan . 1 974, pp . 54-63.

    [ l l l W a sh i ng t on , W . D. a nd Mi dk i f f , C . P . , J o u r n a l o f t h e A s s o c i a t i o n o f O f f i c i a l A n a l y t i c a l

    C h e m i s t s , Vol . 55 , No. 4 , 19 73, pp . 811-822.

    [12] Cook, M. A. , S c i e n c e o f H i g h E x p l o s e s , R he i nho l d t , Ne w York , 195 8 , C ha p t e r 12;

    Appendix 2 , p . 389.

    [13] Amas, S . A. H. and Ya l lop , H. J . , J o u r n a l o f t h e F o r e n s i c S c i e n c e S o c i e t y , Vol. 6, No.

    4, 1 966 , pp. 185-188.

    [14] Urba nsk i , T . , C h e m i s t r y a n d T e c h n o l o g y o f E x p l o s i v e s , Pergamon Press , New York, 1967,

    Vol. 3, Chapter 3.

    [15] Lapagesse, E .,

    I n t e r n a t i o n a l C r i m i n a l P o l i c e R e v i e w ,

    No. 239, June-July 197 0, pp . 176-183.

    [16] S te t tbacher , A. ,

    Pro tar ,

    Vol. 10, 194 4, pp. 158-164.

    [17] W alker , J . T . ,

    J o u r n a l o f C r i m i n a l L a w a n d C r i m i n o l o g y ,

    Vol. 31, No. 4, 1940, p. 497.

    [18] Mait i , P . C . , J o u r n a l o f t h e F o r e n s i c S c i e n c e S o c ie ty , Vol. 13, No. 3, 1 973, p. 197.

    [19] Canadian Indus t r ie s Ltd . , pe rsona l communica t ion , Oc t . 1970.

    [20] Amas, S . A. H. and Ya l lop , H. J . , A n a l y s t , Vol. 94, No. 1 122, 1969, p. 828.

    [21] S a nge r , D . G . , J o u r n a l o f t h e F o r e n s i c S c i e n c e S o c ie ty , Vol. 13, No. 3, 1 973, p. 177.

    [22]

    Ke mpe , A . R . a nd Ta nne r t , W . K. ,

    J o u r n a l o f F o r e n s i c S c i en c e s,

    JFSCA, Vol . 17 , No. 2 ,

    Apri l 1972, pp. 323-324.

    [231

    Lloyd, L B. F. ,

    J o u r n a l o f t h e F o r e n s i c S c i e n c e S o c i e t y ,

    Vol. 7, No. 4, 1967, p. 198.

    [24] Pris te ra , J . , Ha l ik , M. , Cas te l l i , A. , and Freder icks , W. , A n a l y t i c a l C h e m i s t r y , Vol . 32 , No.

    4, 1960 , pp. 495-508.

    [25] Chason, D. E. and Norwi tz , G. , M i c r o c h e m i c a l J o u r n a l , Vo l. 17, No. 1, 197 2, pp. 31-60 .

    [26]

    Nyqu i s t , R . A . a nd Ka ge l , R . O . ,

    I n f r a r e d S p e c t r a o f l n o r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s ,

    Academic Press ,

    New York, 1971.

    [27 ] A S T M P owde r Di f f r a c ti on F i l e , Jo i n t C om mi t t e e on P ow de r Di f f r ac t ion S t a nda rds ,

    Swarthmore , Pa . , 1972.

    [28] Mc C rone , W . C . a nd D e l ly , J . G . , T h e P a r t i c l e A t l a s , 2nd ed . , Ann Arbor Sc ience Publ i she rs ,

    An n Arb or , 1 973, Vol . 4 .

    [29] Byal l , E . B . , pe rsona l communica t ion , Sept . 1973.

    [30] Azaroff , L . A. and Buerger , M. J . , T h e P o w d e r M e t h o d , McGraw-Hi l l , New York, 1958,

    Chapte r 13 .

    [31] Blas te rs H and bo ok, 6 th ed . , Canad ian Indus t r ie s Ltd . , Explos ives Divis ion , M ont rea l ,

    1968.

    [32] Kracek, F . C . and Ksanda , C . J . , J o u r n a l o f P h y s i c a l C h e m i s t r y , Vol . 34 , 1 93 0, pp .

    1741-1744.

    [33]

    RamsdeU, L. S. ,

    A m e r i c a n M i n e r a l o g y ,

    Vo l. 24, No. 2, 19 39, pp. 109-115.

    [34] Schroeder , W. C. , Berk , A. A. , and Gabrie l , A. , J o u r n a l o f t h e A m e r i c a n C h e m i c a l S o c ie t y,

    Vol . 58 , No. 5 , 1936, pp . 843-849.

    Chemistry Section

    C r i me D e t e c t ion La bora t o ry

    R oya l C a na d i a n Mo un t e d P o l ic e

    Edm on t on , Al t a . TS J 2N1

    C a na da