systems integrator evaluation matrix

16
DOD Best Practices Toolkit Systems Integrator Weight Unweighted Score Weighted Score Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3 Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3 Criteria 1 Adherence to RFP Instructions 15 2.5 3 12.5 15.0 0.0 2 Company Information 15 2 3 10.0 15.0 0.0 3 Project Understanding 10 0 2 0.0 6.7 0.0 4 10 2 3 6.7 10.0 0.0 5 Implementation Approach/Methodology 5 2.5 3 4.2 5.0 0.0 6 Project Organization 5 2 2.5 3.3 4.2 0.0 7 Expected Buyer Duties 5 3 3 5.0 5.0 0.0 8 Project Management Approach 5 2.25 2.75 3.8 4.6 0.0 9 Training & Knowledge Transfer 2 2.25 2.75 1.5 1.8 0.0 10 Post Implementation Approach 5 1 3 1.7 5.0 0.0 11 Past Perfromance & Related Engagements 5 1 3 1.7 5.0 0.0 12 Oral Presentations 5 1 3 1.7 5.0 0.0 13 Risk Identification 5 0 3 0.0 5.0 0.0 14 Fee Summary 5 0 3 0.0 5.0 0.0 15 Professional Arrangements 3 2 3 2.0 3.0 0.0 TOTAL (out of 100) 100 48.58 72.25 0.00 Score Level Description Scoring Criteria 3 Excellent SI has fully addressed 2 Strong SI has adequately addre 1 Cause for Concern Requirements A critical issue raises factor. Factor is inad

Upload: abidmanzoor

Post on 26-Nov-2014

226 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Systems Integrator Evaluation Matrix

DOD Best Practices ToolkitSystems IntegratorEvaluation Matrix

WeightUnweighted Score Weighted Score

Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3 Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3

Criteria

1 Adherence to RFP Instructions 15 2.5 3 12.5 15.0 0.02 Company Information 15 2 3 10.0 15.0 0.03 Project Understanding 10 0 2 0.0 6.7 0.04 Functional & Non-functional Requirements 10 2 3 6.7 10.0 0.05 Implementation Approach/Methodology 5 2.5 3 4.2 5.0 0.06 Project Organization 5 2 2.5 3.3 4.2 0.07 Expected Buyer Duties 5 3 3 5.0 5.0 0.08 Project Management Approach 5 2.25 2.75 3.8 4.6 0.09 Training & Knowledge Transfer 2 2.25 2.75 1.5 1.8 0.0

10 Post Implementation Approach 5 1 3 1.7 5.0 0.011 Past Perfromance & Related Engagements 5 1 3 1.7 5.0 0.012 Oral Presentations 5 1 3 1.7 5.0 0.013 Risk Identification 5 0 3 0.0 5.0 0.014 Fee Summary 5 0 3 0.0 5.0 0.015 Professional Arrangements 3 2 3 2.0 3.0 0.0

TOTAL (out of 100) 100 48.58 72.25 0.00

Score Level Description

Scoring Criteria

3 Excellent SI has fully addressed and comforms to best practices2 Strong SI has adequately addressed this factor. Minor deviations from best practices.

1 Cause for Concern A critical issue raises doubt as to SI qualification with this factor. Factor is inadequately address. Large deviations from best practices

Page 2: Systems Integrator Evaluation Matrix

DOD Best Practices ToolkitVendor Evaluation Criteria

Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3 Basis For Score

1. Adherence to RFP InstructionsTimelinessCompletenessOverall quality and professionalismOverall responsivness

Average Score 0 0 0

2. Company InformationFinancial viabilityOrganization StructureOverall exposure to Government sector

Services department/division

Average Score 0 0 0

3. Project UnderstandingOver all understanding of project objectivesUnderstanding of the business requirements

Understanding of the end state vision

Average Score 0 0 0

4. Functional & Non-Functional RequirementsFunctional Requirements: -- -- --

Completeness of vendor response

Extent of proposed exhancements/extensionsExtent of BPR required

Non-Funtional Requirements: -- -- --Vendor ability to meet requirements

Average Score 0 0 0

5. Implementation Approach/MethodologyApplication to this Project

Phases Deliverables, Milestones & Key Decision Points

Page 3: Systems Integrator Evaluation Matrix

DOD Best Practices ToolkitVendor Evaluation Criteria

Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3 Basis For Score

Tools & TemplatesSoftware Package SpecificHigh-level Work PlanRICE Repository UsageRoll-out Strategy

Data StrategyChange Management ApproachBPR

Average Score 0 0 0

6. Project OrganizationOrganization ChartRoles & Responsibilities - SIRoles & Responsibilities - Sub-ContractorsRoles & Responsibilities - Software VendorRoles & Responsibilities - BuyerResource Plan - SIResource Plan - Sub-ContractorsResource Plan - Software VendorResource Plan - Buyer

Mapping of Resumes to RolesProposed Project Team & Resume Review -- -- --

Vendor/Sub Program Executive(s)Vendor/Sub Project Manager(s)Technical Architect(s)Development Lead(s)Process/Functional Lead(s)Change Management Lead(s)BPR Lead(s)

On-Site Work ScheduleTravel Distance to Buyer Site

Average Score 0 0 0

Good mix of Government vs. Commercial experience

Page 4: Systems Integrator Evaluation Matrix

DOD Best Practices ToolkitVendor Evaluation Criteria

Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3 Basis For Score

7. Expected Buyer DutiesClearly DefinedReasonable

Average Score 0 0 0

8. Project Management ApproachExisting PM methodology/approach

Tools & TemplatesDeliverables: -- -- --

Clearly definedAppropriate

Regular Status Reporting against PlanSample status report

Risk Management ApproachSample risk mitigation plan

Issues Management PlanSample issues log

Configuration Mgmt/Change Control ApproachAverage Score 0 0 0

9. Training & Knowlegde TransferTraining: -- -- --

ApproachTimelineDeliverablesDocumentation

Knowledge Transfer: -- -- --ApproachProcesses & ToolsPerformance measurements

Average Score 0 0 0

Page 5: Systems Integrator Evaluation Matrix

DOD Best Practices ToolkitVendor Evaluation Criteria

Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3 Basis For Score

10. Post Implementation ApproachStrategyHelp Desk SupportConfiguration ManagementInfrstructure SupportSystem/Database Support

Average Score 0 0 0

11. Past Performance & Related EngagementsPast Performance: -- -- --

Experience with SW Vendor

Management team experience working togetherExpereince integrating with legacy systemsExperience managing comparable projectsExpereince leading change managementExperience leading BPR efforts

Related Enagements: -- -- --

Completeness of requested informationAverage Score 0 0 0

12. Oral PresentationsStyle & ChemistryFormat follows the RFP

Project team presentationAbility to sufficiently answer questions

Average Score 0 0 0

13. Risk IdentificationPotential project risks identifiedMitigation plan defined

Relevance & similarity of presented engagements

Information in slides or presented did not conflict with written proposal

Page 6: Systems Integrator Evaluation Matrix

DOD Best Practices ToolkitVendor Evaluation Criteria

Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3 Basis For Score

Average Score 0 0 0

Page 7: Systems Integrator Evaluation Matrix

DOD Best Practices ToolkitVendor Evaluation Criteria

Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3 Basis For Score

14. Fee SummaryTotal Fee

Other feesExpenses

Average Score 0 0 0

15. Professional ArrangementsAgreement to use standard contractContract Exceptions

Average Score 0 0 0

Page 8: Systems Integrator Evaluation Matrix

This Free System Integrator Criteria Checklist is provided by:

As a Procurement Service Provider, Source One, has assisted companies with their strategic sourcing requirements for over 15 years. Engagements with Source One may include category management spend consolidation, statements of work, alternate supplier identification, market and supply research, RFP management, price negotiations, and E-enablement. We help companies reduce spend and help reduce the overall cost of acquisition through proven sourcing and purchasing strategies, best practices, people and technologies. Our clients have averaged 18% savings across all product and service categories. Please learn more about Source One by visiting www.SourceOneInc.com , emailing us at [email protected] or calling us toll free @ (888) 399-7687.

Page 9: Systems Integrator Evaluation Matrix