't

"~.,,," #

,J)

,l

FEDERAL GO\T~:-.;' ,,~L:T __\i»l~()~'j~ES L:i' .~<~~,C FOC:\D ..\TIO~~ 1-L-'o.:-]-,t=:;). E- \ lIL l..\ i ::;EC1U~>--\l<.1:\T

ISLA\li\.BAD***

mjeet: MINUTES OF THE .12nd :\IEE~U:\G OF THE ii:XECUTIVE CO:'tl:\llTTEE

HELD ON 25.1.~995.

The 42nd mee:::-; 0:' the Executive Committee of the Federal Government

'lI1ployeesHousing Foundatic: .\;1S :1dd on 25,1.1995 at 3.00 P.\1. in the Committee room of

~1;ZWorksDivision, Block "13, ?akistan Secretariat, Islamabad, under the Chairmanship of its

hainnan (Secretary, Housing 3..:'.d Works). The list of the participants is appended.

The Chairman \\'c:comed the participants of the meeting and asked the Director

'ineral(HF) to open the proc-:;:>-jigr.s. The meeting commenced with recitation from the Holy

luran by Dr. Mohammad R.J.S:,ol Khan, Joint Engineering Adviser, \Vorks Division. The

JCetingthen took up the consic~rations of the :tems of the Agenda one by one.

1genda Item No.1:;ONFIR\1ATION OF l\Hi'lTTES OF THE 41st MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE:OMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF GOVE&'l:ORS.

I. The Financial AJviser (Works) pointed out that he had listed the following

'Dservationson the minutes of :..~e41 st meeting of Executive Committee held on 13.10.1994.

a) The minu:es did not incorporate the advice of Secretary, Housing andWorks, for increasing the number of plots of 50'x90' size and reduce theplots of ::5'x60' size in item };o. 2ee) titled "Launching of HousingScheme for Federal Government Employees on Ovmership Basis at

Lahore".b) The Housing Foundation had to invite quotations in connection with the

printing of brochures for the Lahore Scheme.c) The Annual Profit was indicated as 16.3% in line-1 at page-1 0 of the said

minutes in Additional Agenda [tern :;0.1, whereas it was required to be

indicated J.S 16.5%.

2

4. The Director Go,d. [-lousing Foundation, informed the Committee that the

"marks of Secretary (H& W), '0 ;"c. ng the increasing of number of plots of categorv

-I and

category-llwere eorrcct[ y inco,,-- ,o',d in the minutes of meeting under item 21'c) "Launching of

HoosingScheme for Federal G,,,crnn.,nt Employees on Ownership Basis at Lahore". Moreover,

thecopies of quotations called:'" :'1, printing of brochures tor the Lahore Scheme had already

beenprovided to the Finane ial'.J ,i cer (Works). Further the minutcs correct! y reflected the

ftgnreof Annual Profit @ 16.':', in Additional Agenda Item NO.1 of the minutes of meeting.

Itwasalso stated that the above c1ari!lcations had already been communicated to the Financial

Adviser(Works) organization.

i. The Committee ~cepted the clarifications made by the Director General, Housing

foondationand confirmed the ".:nutes of its 41 st meeting held on 13. 10.1994

The Director General, Housing Foundation briefed the Committee about the

positionof handing over of houses and communication of cost of completed houses to the

respectiveallottees. The committee was also informed that after the issuance of notice to the

allotteesthat thcir hOllses would be auctioned if they did not clear their dues by 15.12.1994, the

responsefrom the allottees towards clearance of dues and taking over of houses was quite

~tisfactory. However, after the filing of petition by some allottees in the Supreme Court of

Pakistanthat the possession of rhe houses should be given by the Housing Foundation to the

allotteesnn the basis of costs given in the brochure suhject to final settlement of accounts and

pendingadjudication of the petition and passing of the interim order by the Supreme Court in

ceaseon 11.12.1994, that the status quo be maintained till the matter is placed in Court, the

DCessof clearance of dues anJ handing over of houses had slowed dov,TI considerably. The

mmitteewas further informed that till date 823 houses had been handed over to the allottees.

umberof applications from the allottees for extension of time for payment of dues within one

ixmonths were being receiyed daily.

Agwda Item No.2:REVIEWOF CLEARANCE OF DUES AND HANDING OVER OF COMPLETEDHOUSESUNDER PHASE-I OF THE HOUSING SCHEME AT ISLAMABAD.

Director General, Housing Foundation explained that with the completion of 1356

The Chairman dir:cted that the all allottees to whom final costs had not yet been

b) Late pa, runt surchargcs @I% per month on the outstanding amount

chargeab le from the date of actual default.

The Committee ','.::..s ir.:'ormcd that non-clearance of dues by the allottees would

housesand finalization of accounts of about 1150 houses, quantities of work done itemwise both

inrespect of individual houses and each package/contract had became available and on that basis

ille cnntr.ctors accounts were to be tinalized. The work for the construction of about 1791

houseswas awarded to 17 contractors in 19 packages having contract value of about 30 million

h. The actual cOIlstruction lias, ho we ver, limited to 1591 houses as the rem a; ning ploIS in

10.

Agenda Item No.3:EXTENSION IN THE CONTRACT PERIOD AND IMPOSITION OF LIQUIDATEDDAMAGES ON THE DEFAULTING CONTRACTORS O~' PHASE-I OF THE

HOUSING SCHEME AT ISLAMABAD.

3

communicated, should be apprised of the costs of their houses latest by 15.2.1995, and if they

donot clear their dues within the notice period, the above mentioned additional charges may be

leviedon them after the expiry of the notice period. In case of those allottees who failed to clear

their dues by I 5, 12.1 994, as n au fied ear Iier, the Iate payment surcharge and actual watch and

wardcharges should be levied with effect from that date. The Chairman also directed to notify

the same to the allottees through press.

9.

8. On a query from the Chairman, the Director General (Housing Foundation)informed that final cost of aNnt 250 houses was still to be intimated to the allottees after

authentication of the same by :h: Consultants.

adversely affect the repoy,,""'" ..:' \,E:1 along with interest to the Ministry of Finance obtained

earlierby the lIo usi ng Foumla: nIt '.' os, therefore, proposed that the allottecs who were given

noticesfor pannent of dues b~ IS.I' 199~, but had not yet cleared their dues may be levied the

following additional chargcS:-a) Actual v'.,':h "cd ward charges incurred till the clearance of dues, and

7.

4

1;couldnot be handed over to the Housing Foundati;.' f' ~:. the CDA due to disputes

K'ca1 inhabitants for the compensation payable to them. The completion of houses by

1992(stipulated) and then by the extended date of December, 1992, could not be

The Consultant had conducted an exercise to determme the period which could be

.;!ne contractors due to modifications/variations or. the request of allottees revision of

';!\ued by the Consultant, delay in provision of mate~ials (cement/steel) during expended

cmnpletionetc. However, default in each case ha.:: been found to be much more than

0.5% per day) required for levy of the maximum liquidated damages amounting to

',:ontractvalue. The Committee was also informed that the delay in each case ranged

.J i() 730days. However, it was apprehended that t1:e levy of liquidated damages in full

theproject at its fag end in the following ways:-

i) Handing over of the remaining houses cou:d be obstructed.

ii) Removal of defects/deficiencies r.ote-: at the time of handmg over of the

house could be hampered.

iii) Maintenance problems noticed witl'.::: 12 months of the completion of

houses could not be attended 2; the Contractors as required under the

contracts.

iv) Encashment of Performance B:.:-.o ~ ".:.:d ':='eobstru.:ted delayed by the

Contractors through litigation as cxp-::-: enced in the past.

Afterdetailed discussion, the Committee obs:C".-ed that as per contract, the Ovmer

10 levy the liquidated damages, The D:rt.:::o: e-eIieraL Housing Foundation beiIig

:;,ay, therefore, take action as per reie\'aIi: ~:::1'..-:2';; Dr tIle agreement.

ACCOC:\'TS OF '1'Ht_ CO:\TRACTORS OF PHASE-IStl:\l CO:\'TRACT \'S rlFT'. ILED 'lEAS{'RE\lEl"T BASIS.

5

of percentage below or abovc (=c, :), t~::: schedule rates given in the Bill of Quantities (130Q)

together with the towl price for ~~=h h ';'Jsing unit type in all the six categorics of houses, The

quantities, schedule rates and aco~n:s, against the nomenclature of BOQ for each unit type in

all categories of houses and to:2.: 2JT )unt thus arrived at after incorporating the calculated

percentage above and below the s=hed ~!e rates formed the basis of "lump sum contract", The

list of optional items was also a~2.=h~c '.'.itb the 130Q and these items were to be carried out as

and when required by the O\\'l1eL ~hc ~'Jr1l1ingpayments to the contractors \\ere stipulated to be

made according to the schedule of paY:-:1ent based on different stages of progress of v;ork. The

payment were initially made in ter:ns of percentage of the accepted lump sum cost of each unit

as stipulated for various stages of progress of \vork.

13. The contractors in earlier stages of work expressed certain difficulties regarding

payments on the basis of the scr.e<:iule of p3yment as stipulated in the contract. The matter v,'as

reviewed by the Director GeneraL Hocsing found3tion, in consultation v:ith the Consultant and

the Contractors on 15,1.1992 and a re\'ised procedure for payments on detailed measurement basis

in respect of each item of the BOQ actually executed at site was agreed. The revised procedure

was notified to all the contractors by the Consultant on 16.1.1992. In practical terms, the nature

of the contract was changed from lump sum to item-wise detailed measurements. Since then all

the running payments had been made on the basis of detailed measurements of each item of work

as actually executed at site.

14. The Director General, Housing foundation drew attention of the Committee

towards certain contradictions in the \arious clauses of the Contract dealing with quantification

of the work done at site as per BOQ and variations/modifications desired by the allottees and

evaluation thereof. for example clause 14.1 of the General Conditions of Contract stipulates:-

"The Quantities set out in the Bill of Quantities are the estimated

quantities of the work but should there be variation in the actual

quantities of the works executed by the Contractor in fulfillment of

his obligations under the Contract, beyond five percent plus or

minus (=:5%), the difference in quantities shall be adjustable on the

accepted quoted rates."

l-------------------------------

Variations in the lump sum work ;: a~;( ,',cd vide clause 11 of the GenerD.l Cunditions or Contro.ct

subject to the follo\ving stipulat:Lc~ glen in clause ll.lCe) ibid:-

(i) This LUi\[? SL\f Contract shall not gi\e rise to any financial claims to the

Contracto:,:X l'} any \ariation in quantity, increase or deerClse,

(ii) For ,my \,:,:::,:;"':,: placements the Consultants \\ill issue \D.riation order and

the O\\l1e: ',ill ;::y to or deduct Crom the Contractor. at the stage of final

bill, as pe: ::.cceved quoted rates,

It could thus be construed that L~e cor.tract \vas lump sum and only quantities executed beyond

:t 5% of those given in the BOQ 'xerepayable.

Director General. EJusi:<g Foundation. further informed that the extent of\ariation

was applied in almost 47% of t:::e hOL:ses \\hich changed the concept of project from "repeated

nature of construction" to "indi'\icual construction catering for the indi\'idual needs/option" to a

large extent. Under the circumst2.l'lces if the lump sum nature of the contract was retained and

C:t5%) of the BOQ quantities adjL:Sted in the final bills of the contractors, the same may lead to

an anomolous situation as the cOIltractors had been paid on measurement basis in respect of the

quantities of \vork actually execu:ed at the work sites,

15.

16.After detailed deliberations, it was decided that the issue may be considered by the

Technical Committee headed by the Director General, Pak PWD and 1'.1r. S. P. Chohan,

Managing Director, NeL, may also be co-opted as its member. The recommendations of the

Technical Committee would be put up for consideration of the Executive Committee in its next

meeting.

Agenda Item No.5:EXTENSION OF CONSliL TANCY AGREEMENT OF l\'1/S DEVELOPMENT

CONSULTANTS.

--=--_._-_._. --_.;.: ..... ~

Director General, Housing Foundation, informed the Committee that an agreement

for full time site supervision of houses was initially made with MIs Development Consultants for17.

II

7

a period of 24 months @ 2% of ..:--';r;(.~::ct completion cost \.vhich expired on 28.2.1993 As the

construction of houses could not '::: c'.:-::ktcd in timc, an additional agrcement for rendering the

consultancy services \\as mad,:; . };; nh..1Illhs ur till the completion of \vork ;1t monthly'

rcrnuncrati()n of Rs '.37.nOO/- w.- c:: •. ~ from 1.3.1993,

18. It \\3S also cxpla::--.::; ',:~:::wilh the change in nature of the contract drawn \\'ith the

contractors from lump sum basi::: :: ~c:::: kd measurement basis the \\ork of Consultant increased

enormously. In the meantime, t.:.-,:- case of contractors who had filed Civil Suits were referred to

the Arbitrator in February, 1 <;"9":'. uder the provisions of their contracts. Contracts of 5

contractors who had gone into >:,;atic':l were terminated in August. 1994, as they had stopped

the \\'ork 3t site. The Consultan:.o ::1IJS ~Jd to render the folto\\ing services in addition to the site

supervIsIon: -

i) Assistanc-:: .:1 the :\rbitration proceedings.

ii) Attendance ~n courts as and \\hen required.

iii) Cost evalu::.tion and processing of the measurement files of individualhouses, coepleted as well as taken on ' as is where is' basis.

iv) Monitoring of punch list items by the Contractors and e\'aluation of theircost for rer.lnd to the allottees, if not attended within the sprcified notceperiod.

v) Proccessing of interim bills of the contractors.

To evaluate and process the remaining about 150 measurement files of

individual houses,

Now with the completion of 1350 houses (except to 239 houses which are under

i)

19.

litigation) and with the finalization of about 1150 houses, the scope of consultancy job had

reduced considerably. The Consultants had proposed to reduce their fee from Rs 337,000/- to

Rs 323, 100/- per rnonth. The Hcusing FoundDtion, howe\'er, keeping in view the balance v.:ork

proposed 1/],7/ I/]e strength of Consul!:lJJt 's sl:1!T he reduced to ]5 persons H'hh remuncra{jon of

170,0001-per month fOr rendaing [he follmn:'1g se:nicc.,,:-

Technical Committee, under t;-.e Chairmanship of Director General, PAk PWD. ML Sabir P.

Chohan, Ivlanaging Director, NCt. r.lay also be co-opted as member of the said Committee. The

Technical Committee may SUOf:"".:t its recommendations for consideration of the Executive

Committee in its next meeting.

After detailed dcl:':;erations, it was decided that the case may be examined the

lil) Proccssir:2;:':': :::1Jl bills of the Contractors, and

8

- ~-_._---=

To super-,'i:,~ th.: remoyal of defects/deficiencies reflected in the punch listsfor hOllS';:: ;:-.:L-'C::J o\cr LO ind:\idual allottees,

ii)

iy) l\kasurer.(-:-.~s c.:.J c\'aJuation of the work done by the Contractors whosecontracts h.:\e been terminated and further action is held up due to stayorders gr.?S.:ed by the Court.

20.

Agenda Item NO.6:HOUSING SCHEME FOR :\I~AS, JCDGES, CIVIL SERVANTS A~D JOUNALISTSETC., IN SECTOR G-13, ISL~\IABAD (PHASE-III).

21. Director General, Housing Foundation, apprised the Committee of the progress

made so far in connection with la'.-:l1chingof Housing Scheme for ;\1NAs, Judges, Civil Servants

and Jounalists etc., in sector G-13, Islamabad (Phase-III). It was informed that Deputy

Commissioner, Islamabad, had since been approached to initiate action for acquisition of land in

sector G-13, Islamabad. The matTer had been pursued \vith the Assistant Commissioner! District

Collector, Islamabad, to prepare the follov.:ing documents required for the issuance of notification

under section-4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

i) Copy of Jamaban di of the land required;ii) Field Book;iii) Aks Shajra.

the publication of the notification referred ab;ve, the Housing Foundation would then be

'sedto enter the area and conduct negotiations with the local land owners or ask the Deputy

9

CRITERIA FOR ELIGIBILITY

criteria for eligibility, procedu:: anc criteria for allotment under the said scheme:-

Commissioner to acquire the :::-':-.1 0:-. behalf of the Housing Foundation. The negotiations with

the Lind owners can be cond;~c~.~J '::. a Land Purchase Committee to be constituted under the

instructions of the Board of C,=. :::-n-.~s/E:\ecuti\'e Committee.

The following criteria for eligib::ity ',\as approved for inviting applications for the scheme which

may be reckoned as Phase-III ]f t~.e housing scheme in continuation of the similar housing

scheme in Islamabad:-

The Committe::: Jso :eliberated upon other issues and approved the following

a) Sitting Senators 2.Ild .\fembers of the National Assembly;

c) Federal Governrr.ent employees including civilian employees paid from defenceestimates in ser\':ce on the cut off date or since re-employed after retirement.

b) Judges of the SutJreme Court and Federal Shariat Court;

22,

1I~t. 1~

IIIj

I,j

d) Employees of 2~ltonomous/semi-autonomous organisations and public sectororganisations under the administrative control of the Federal Government inservice onthe cut off date or re-employed after retirement.

e).-

f)-

5% of the plots in each category to be reserved for journalists and press workers;

Suitable percentage of plots in each category to be earmarked for the retiredFederal Government employees including employees of the autonomous/semi-autonomous orga.l1isations and public sector corporations under the administrativecontrol of the Federal Government.

g) 2% of the plots in each category to be reserved for the \vidows of the eligibleFederal Government employees including employees of autonomous/semi-autonomous organisations and public sector corporations under the administrativecontrol of the Federal Government who died during service or those FederalGovernment employees including employees of autonomous/semi-autonomous andpublic sector Corporations \..-ho btcame disabled during service.

h) Armed forces personlJel are not eligible to participate in the scheme.

~.

PROCEDURE FOR ALLOT)IE."T

a) The :1pplications ,~:-:;'c Senators ;ll'd \fcmbers of the l\'Jtional Assembly shall beforwarded to tl'_;; C~:::~man Senate and Speaker of the National Assemblyrespectively for :"-::~~t:r~:.recommendations in the light of the criteria for eligibility;lIl,iJ!lolmcIlt 0< ;: ),C"

b) The applications O~- the ~udgcs shall be forwarded to the Chief Justice of SupremeCourt of Pakistar:. f ~.rth:::ir scrutiny and their recommendations for allotment in thelight of the laid Jc.m:ritcria for eligibility and allotment of plots.

c) Applications fro~ the ~ournalists and press \vorkers shall be forwarded to theMinistry of Infor:T2tion and Broadcasting for their scrutiny and recommendationsfor allotment in :e~:ns of the laid down criteria.

d) The applications c:' the federal Go\'ernment employees and employees of theautonomous/semi-2Jtonomous organisations and public sector corporations underthe administrative .:ontrol of the Federal Government shall be scrutinised by theHousing Foundatic1.

CRITERIA FOR ALLOTME:\i

23. The Committee afta discussing the plot sizes and costing structure, directed thatthe cost structure may be finalizeJ in consultation \vith the Managing Director, NCL.:t ..

a)

b)

c)

Mode of scrutiny of applications and the seniority for the purpose of allotmentshall be determineJ in order of the date of birth of the applicant.

First priority shall Je given to those applicants who or their spouses or any othermember of their fa..'11ilies do not own plotfhouse in Islamabad on the cut off date.Each applicant shall have to submit an affidavit to this effect.

Second priority shJJl be given to those applicants who or their spouse and anyother member of their families o\vn plot/house in Islamabad on the cut off date orwho v:ere ever allotted a plot in Islamabad by the CDA ,

.-jj Agenda Item NO.7:REPORT OF INVESTMENT COMMITTEE.

of Investment Committee was held under the Chairmanship of Director General, NHA, in his

office on J 0.11.1994, as per decision taken in the Eyecutive Committee meeting held on

,.~. ~~. _:....... .c:;

24. Director General, Housing Foundati?n, informed the Committee that the meeting

13.10.1994. [n the meeting c f Il1\c;stment Committee, it \\"as discussed that the deposits of

Housing Foundation ami N IrA ):-_,Jcld be imcsted in such a way that m3.\imum return could be

under active consideration of th= Privatisation Commission. The same was the case \\-ith 1'\DFC

which had incidently quoted (wufIlciaily') the highest rate (17.25%).

under his Chairmanship had already been discussed in the meeting of the Executive Committee

held on 13.10.1994, wherein it was decided to invest the deposits in five years FDRs of the

National Bank of Pakistan.

14.20%15.00%17.25%16_30% (Likely to be increased to

16.50%)

United Br.k Ld.Habib K:.r~<Ltd.NDFCNational 83.111:of Pakistan

(I)(2)(3)(4)

It was, however, learnt and also reported in press that the privatization of UBL was

The fullo\\ing ~:-.ti::::; of returns on deposits \\ere offered by vanous

Financial Adviser (Works) stated that the Report of the Invesment Committee

achie\ccl_

banks/oruanizations: -

25.

26.

27. The Chairman directed that the decision of the Executive Committee on the

recommendations of the Investment Committee referred to by the Financial Adviser (\\lorks) may

be implemented.

Agenda Item No.8:THE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR THE YEAR 199.t-95 AND REVISED ESTIMATESFOR THE YEAR 1993-94.

Estimates of the Housing Foundation for the year 1994-95 \vere prepared in consultation with

Financial Adviser (Works). The Committee went through the Budgetary Estimates and approved

the same.

28. Director General, Housing Foundation, informed the Committee that the Buget

as priority-II applicant for the I=~-:J0sc oJfallotment of a house in Phase-II, as she already owned

two nats.

Agenda Item NO.9:C\SEOF OIt SIRS. DiL(~CIS .JEIf.-\:~. O"\':\ER OF 1'\\'0 FLATS FOR ACCORDING? inO RIT"\'-IJ.

Agenda Item NO.IO:CASE OF MR. MOHAM~IAD KHA~ ZAFAR, ASSISTA~T DIRECTOR FORALLOTI\lENT OF A CATEGOR'y'-II HOeSE IN PHASE-II AS HE COULD NOT GETA HOUSE IN PHASE-I DUE TO O\V~I:\G A FLAT.

category-III house in Phase-I for whic!1 he had applied. The seed money was also refunded to

him. He did not formally apply L:1 Phase-II as nat O\vners in Islamabad were declared ineligible

for the Scheme. After examining all aspects of the case, the Committee did not agree to accord

him priority-I for the purpose of allotment of a house/plot in Phase-II.

The case was di s.::_ssec :n detail. It was decided that Dr, Bilquis may be treated

1'.1r. Zafar O\\l1ed :: nat in Islamabad and \\'JS not considered for allotment of a

29.

30.

IjIi

IIIIIIJ

1iI;l

jAgenda Item No.ll:CASE OF MR. JAN ALAM, ORDl\AI\'CE DEPOT, i'\"O\VSHERA, FOR CONSIDERINGALLOTMENT OF A CATEGORY-III HOUSE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE \VAFAQIMOHTASIB.

31. Mr. Jan Alam being a civilian employee of Ordnance Depot, Nov/shera was not

eligible to participate in Phase-I of the Housing Scheme. He did not formally apply in Phase-II

., when the civilian employees paid from Defence Estimates were made eligible to participate. He

was advised on 24,11.1993 and again on 13,12.1993 to take refund of his deposits but he did not

do so, He filed a complaint in the Wafaqi Mohtasib's Secretariat which recommended to place

the said case before the Executive Committee for its consideration, The Committee, after on

indepth examination of the case, did not agree to the plea of the applicant for allotment of a

category-III house/plot in Phase-II.

----------)--~-~

Agenda Item No. 12:ALLOT\1EXT OF.\ CA TFCOEY-I H01;SE TO DR MOHA:\l\'1AD SHAFI, DIRECTOR,PLA:\T F!HrL'~CTIO:\, ti\'SLCCf>;~FUL PRIOI{lTY-lI APPUC.\:'\T OF PHASE-! !:"iLIEU OF CATECORY-I! ALL()Tl [D TO 111M IN PHASE-II.

The Committee \',.::5 :n:'c):med that Dr. :Vlohammad Shari owned a hou:c;e at ~(arachi

and \\as a priority-II applicant i:: F:--::'.s::-I. He applied again in Phase-II for a category-I as well

as a category-II house. His cas.;; ~ou; j neither mature for allotment of a category-I nor for a

category-II house. Ho\\cvcr, be:;;; 2..."l1nsuccessful applicant for a category-II house in Phase-I,

he \\as allotted a category-II hOL:;.: j: ;;:\ing him preference o\'er the fresh applicants of Phase-II

in confirmity with thc decision ~i,:en i:1 the 35th meeting of the Executive Committee held on

14.3.1993. Dr. Shafi made a re:Jresen:Jtion to the Prime ~linister for allotment of a category-I

house/plot according to his entitl CI:'.ent. The Committee, after considering all aspects of the case,

did not agree to consider him for :dlotment of a category-I house,

Agenda Item No.1]:ACCORDING PRIORITY-I TO :\lR. ABDUL REH:\IAN KHATTAK, PRINCIPALENGINEER, PAEC, \VHO O\V\S A HOUSE IN PESHA \VAR A:'\D A FAR1\'1 LAND INHIS NA:\'lE AND IN THE NA.\lE OF HIS \VIFE AT TARNOL, FATEH JANG ROAD,RA\VALPINDI.

33. The Conunittee was informed that village Ahmad Khel, near Bada Bel' where Mr.

that the case, after further investigation from the quarters concerned whether the statements of

the applicant are true, be put to E.'\ecutive Committee for its consideration,

])}e [ommjttee was inionlJed that a rev,.' app}jcants had submitted applications for

Abdul Rahman Khattak, the applicant, owned a house was outside the municipal limits of

Peshawar City. Similarly, Bhadana Kalan where the applicant was reportedly ovming agricultural

land was located in Federal Area Oslamabad), outside the city limits. The Committee decided

Agellda Item No. 14:ALLOTMENT OF A CATEGORY-I HOVSEIPLOT IN PHASE-I OF HOUSING SCHEMEAT KARACHI - REQUEST FROl\f MR. IHASHKOOR-UL-HAQUE, STATISTICALOFFICER.

34.allotmentof houses/plots one category J60ve thdr actual ent/rlement /n tile KaraciJi Scneme.

ccordingto the Project Director, plots are available in the required categories to accommodate

14

such requests. The Committee ::~c:c'.:d to pend the matter for the time being.

The case \vas Q:s.:ussed in detail in the light of the working paper and it was

Additional Agenda Item NO.1:CASE FO MR. MOHAMD ~l\LIK,JOINT SECRETARY.

Agenda Item No. j 5:ALLOTMENT OF PLOTS TO SO\lE Sl:CCESSFUL APPLlCANTS OF CATEGORY-I11\ 1-8 iN LIEU OF PLOTS .\LL()[TED TO THEM l~ SECTOR D-12 A7'\D E-12.

decided that ex-post facto appro\:l1 of the Chairman, Board of Governors be obtained in case of

plot ?\o. 127, 1-8/3, allotted :2 Raja l\10hammad Saleem KJ1an, Accountant General, Azad

Kashmir.

The Committee, ajer consideration of the facts of the case, decided that since Mr.36.

I

I1IJji

IIti

IMohammad Malik, o\vned a hous~ on a plot size of 354 sq.yds., at Islamabad, he was not eligible

to participate in the Scheme in ac..::ordance \vith its terms and conditions stipulated in the brochure

for Phase-II.

Additional Agenda Item NO.2:RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE FOR ESTATE MANAGEMENTWORKS AND PROCESSIJ"G CASES OF \VIDO\VS AND HARDSHIP FORALLOTMENT OF HOUSES N PHASE-II.

37. The Committee agreed to the setting up of the proposed Sub-Committee

comprising the following:-

The Sub-Committee would look into the important issues relating to the Estate Management and

allotment of plots to the eligible applicants, wido\'y's of deceased government employees and

underprivileged/hardship cases on case to case basis.

~-

i)

ii)

iii)

Joint Secretary (Works)

Deputy Secretary (Admn)

Director (Tech-I), Housing Foundation

Chairman

Member

Member

15

Additional Agenda Item NO.3:CONSIDER.'\. TION OF THE CASE OF MR. MUZAFFAR H. BAIG, FOR ALLOTMENTOF A HOUSE Il'{ PHASE-II.

38. It was brought :0 :hc :-'lotice of the members that a similar proposal previously

placed before the Committee '.~2.S lllr.,ed down. The Committee was further informed that the

date of birth of the applicant 'X2.S -+.1.1930 and his case as a retired applicant was not likely to

mature for allotment on the basis of age-wise seniority even if he had formally applied in Phase-

II. The Committee, therefore, G:d not agree to consider his request for allotment of a house in

preference to the fresh appl ic2...its 0 f Phase- 11.

Any other matter:

39. Joint Secretary (Cabinet) pointed out that the sufficient notice period was not given

to the members to prepare themselves properly in view of heavy agenda for the meetings. The

Chairman, directed that in future the Agenda and 'Working Papers for the meeting may be

circulated among the members at least 7 days before the convening of the meeting.

40. The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the Chair.

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OF TH~~42nd ivfEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEOF THE BOARD OF G('\T::>,:'\ORS OF THE FGE HOUSI1\G FOUNDATION.

~~E~,D00i JAi\U:\RY 25. 1995

S.No. Name and Designatior::

1. !vlr. Ijaz Ahmad, ChairmanSecretary,Housing and Works Di\-:sion,Islamabad.

') Mr. Muhammad Rafiq'Jc A\r::ed, ;vfember•....l Director General,

1 Pak PWD, Islamabad.

1 " Jv1r.Mohammad Aslam, Member-'.~ Joint Secretary,i:l Cabinet Division,] Islamabad.i

j 4. Mr. Yawar Zia, Member#.

a Financial Adviser (Wor~s),~~!J Islamabad.--iit

5. Dr. Mohammad Rasool Khan, MemberJoint Engineering Adviser,Works Division, Islamabad.

6. Jv1r. Saif Ali, MemberDeputy Secretary (Admn),\Vorks Division, Islamabad.

7. Jv1r.Taseer Hussain Kadar, Co-opted MemberOfficer on Special Duty.Mlo Food and Agriculture,Co-opted Member, Category- V allottees,Islamabad.

8. Jv1r. Sarshar Ali Malik,Director General,Housing Foundation,Islamabad.

9. Mr. Shahid Hameed,Director (Tech-I),Housing foundation, Isl~--=-.~b..lJ.

10. Mr. Qamar Shah Khan,Direclor (Tech-ll),Housing Foundation, Islc.::.:..DJu.

11. ivlr. Aurang Zeb Khan,Project Director,FOE Housing Foundatioc.., ?eshawar,Camp Office, Islamabad.

By Special Invitation.

12.

13.

14.

Mr. T\1ohammad Javaid, (for Agenda Item 7)Deputy Director General.NHA, Islamabad.

Mr. Sabir P. Chohan (for Agenda Item 6)Managing Director, NCL,Islamabad.

Lt. Col. (Retd) Muhammad Nazir, (for Agenda Items 3, 4 & 5)Chief Engineer,Development Consultants,Islamabad.

: ) ;')~/

,) .,

, ,• ,'-- .J

, ,• J . •. .J ~

_ _.J J -' _,_ , ~ <; ':: .-: \...._--_.~-_. -~------_ ..-~-- - -----'" ""--~---~. --- -- ----_ ..- -----_. ----- - -----------

__ ,". I I,' .'~ ~ •.......• , __ .•..•.•. c':'

11 'J. :: G G.}

1')).'. /'-'I I _/

'(- \,- :-'.;\.;~~J\I{.": l';' ...• ;,:C

j;l _ --- -'~, I.i i1

')~ . J. u,.1.. . ..J

~.--;!.'-II

Di vi- .::"1. (j ;'1,

(

\--I,

I . ('' .'{u

il'~~.((I C Q ;•.: [':it.J..t ".._J r t u ~~("~£J. L.'j e.;:.... ; t.: :1..1 "'Ii

,- , , ..~ ~.;. .' _l .• l~ l.L

......-

''-) ,/1,-.1l/'v"

\).J

•,,-..:.J

\.t.'!b

• .J

(j 'I C:;,(: I) 1']- ( ,',": -_:~~ __ _:_~ .. J..:. . ....._:..~ _! .•...._~_~~...: ~~ .. .. --------

Der fO(>1"1:\J Cc'v-t .l:,:T! (jT.e~ lToU;:;1.llf'; Founcb.tlon 1 ~ 10 ter No.2ii~li~~-~,~'_~~)-,-~~t. ~.':~1!~?~'~0~~~:.:~~.J~_o_D__4._. -_._--

(1) lton NCf,:'(C); r[l~('~~r.[ or H01l'{.;1Jl[ ScllcIJof(:JI: F~ck;rfc1 (0{1t.f'l1;::)loyr::c~.9~1('yo!": Co~''L\~L~!fl.''t.~~~_~~, :)l~ •• -_.------

(i1.) T..:\('.:, r thl:::l .~l811 it 111:11 bb6U -PT6'[:o'£ed tll1Lt tllBreI \

\' D]' ~:2 125 ;'lot3 or 50 X. 0:) flnd l::YJO ploi::~ OJ", I::5 x GO. SecretarynJZtW) n~vie:ed tlmt Ilurlt.-er of

, I

ploh; of ~d7E ~iU X ~() n\sy Do in(~'(lu;,itJd n.!1,dTlunoor1 1

d rlotlO of ~:!)x Gt) lllilY b.a r'6dllO,x1. ~\ttnut~ in

rn~pect o! Hern No.~(c) do not contatn tho 8oc:1Uta.r)1(flH'I) 1 $ advice which rr~~ykindly be Lncorporated.

."- .- -' --- ....---- ,-

(b) It \l.'a~ pv~cd by DausUg Faun,:latioo tllAt brocl!U1'ei'army be got prIntod @ Thft '),01- ef\.>11 f:rom MIS SigmaPT'C~1J ,TI.awalplndL HDwever J it W l!l decided thtttJL.:n.•d.l.lg l'oundution will uloo Obta.in quc-tatioofil 00~ to ,tulfil ~ :rm1M.l.i tie6! UIld k~"P tl10 ~wneill tL>eir rccortl. MinuteB do not ('Cntain thiadeeL~Loo which nood. to be inC011 orated. :Further.it the quotn,t:1oollS have ooru obtu: rted, a !XJPYat tl16smrc ms.y be Slrppl1;Jd to PA'm Org, ni~tion.

(ii)Addl.ltemNo.l:f'.2p~rt at th(:, InV'e$t1't.r<mt Ccmrr1ttee ctl~tituted bythe Jl..'tecljth""l.~ O:J:rmitte:-a of th3 FedcI II C1ovb.EtiPl~non~in'1'Fot.'tH.ln tioo.___ "c -------~---- ' .---

In li.nn 1 at pnp;e 10 ot the rr,inuwtll, ant'.uiU. profithM bc('n indicatod fiB 18.,3'1<,~ch is. not cor:t"e'.:rt.100 mUffi8 may kindly b.1! OC,.tTftQt }..llllJ 1i:l.fJ%.

'1'hi~ i~tlf"e 'l'i'ith the oppI'OVILl of F.A.(Work.il). -----/~----~

( HJJiyZ',- UR- RAE MAN )D.F •. \. (WOfCKE)

MI'. Sa:r:1$hlU' A. !In.1Di I Dl1"'(}ctor Goneral :} e<.teral GaVt. Ehploye.!:-1f ~ng li'ounda.t101,Slw.hoo<.i---e--Millat e0C~ta:riflt Govt .ot J>a1:ut!to Ilillamabwl.}"'11l.ljJ~:l'lAO'~u,o.N().'I'":~"Ci~K(W)~~~-1!~27D~~r ~rTIDr I

// I

tp5!f~->/ ):,1'1\' (l'IDm",) ,

\~/}I(liT) l!-f-..f "J' ", ~.\) t- J/ \v \\ ~r-)//I • -----

'v ~ ~; --;;j 'f .\ I

2.

1~I)U\,\ll;()\T!,',.' ,!:_,' j !.\!iJU))! l~; !1()l'SI\() j,()U,<U/\ 1()\:-:;11:\:~:,i. LJ-E-V r LLA r ';;U~ I'T!\J~ [:\1'

jSj_/.\1;\;2.\~)

dllll,lry 10, ,]C))

\/11'. !Lli'ccL"lIr.Rc:~:l:~!1.J)L'PLIly !ill,IIlCld! .....1\ i:.~1 (\\'uILcJ),

!'/\'s ()1':',I!li:;;ltil):':. 'n- !~i')l'k,p (:k i::.;1;) 11 l,~l'l~r (' 1(~r~:1:,

I~)Llil~..lbl1d.

1Jf.~,~) ()\. ();~."~" J::t::{ !3. !t)(j-.f.----._._---~-_.- ------------

){erL'rc~I1L',:: ~ 0.11' '.1 J. :--<0. :2(3 i)/DF:\( \\')/93-1502/9.+, (Like! 7.1 1.1 S ':.1.+.

Me gl\'-Cll ns below:-

(ij ) IL' IJl Xu 2 (L)/o!!lIcinl' IJ{//IJl/sing Schi:!i:e flu,. F:::c!cm/ (;()\'CI'!!!.!..J.('iIf FlJlp/ov('c.\' on '-"JJ:'!Ji.'j'.\'h!l~!:.I'is (IILn!tore,

(a) During discussion 0:1 the libovt item of Zlgencla, the Chairman ( bserved that the

(b)

number or plots for catcgory-l ';lIll! II 111,1)' be increaseJ to cope: \ i'h ~ht.:expected

(lcm,ll1d. It wns thIS :lgrccd t11"t ~hc ph) sica! planning of the ,II', .1 wOllld be done

according to the au:.-_!! (km~l::.d for V,triOLls categoric::; ofp!ots a~'~:e lhe rccL'il[ of

applications. The 5,1111C hZlS been inCOrp()rdlcc! in the above mil ue5 (lccorc!ing!y.

The Housing Faun btion -)bt~lilled ~luotul:on5 iur printing ot' !.~OC:'L n:s fur the

above Schcme, 1 he b: . 'hurl's h.i\':? b:.:cn got printed rhr'J'lgh .\Us Trends

Advcr(isil:g (p"') L[~j \','1:0 (;LOl:.J l1k lew, cst rales. Copies of qOW!,OIlS obtained

"--.-.--- ==------_~._ ~_~ __~~ ._~'_~_." .~.~",.;;..~!<~~. __~.";j.;"-'&~~_~~"'h,-".~~ -'"~. ~~~~~_ ..

,.!d/! Jh'i.'l .\',J.!K'jl.iliLi!/!l.Ll~J}L'0L\{~!},-,-'!lLC~'~~~~'1~\lijJ!!,--'ij J r-!l.!~'-.l'\l[IIIjJ.:~C( Jill I}' i! !e~ :!!IE)~l:!.-!~r!!I

I) ,

Receipts (!\\)~"s) ie, e:c)'.::.::tcL1 ':) Di.: raised tJ 16 5~'Q by the b:1f1k :iutllorities It the

close at' the ye:lI ie, 3 I 12 'LJ9cf. III I~,t';t: ot' revision that \.'ould ,!ls:o bc

J. This iSSLJ:':s Wi,.l he :\,-:,r;~,J\'dl r)' the Director Gel1er,t!, !-lousing F('ll!1Ci:lliol1

EnelCopies of qlloti\lions. 8 "\0:; tL

./

~ S II A !l , ) , J \1\1 [ E [) )lL," Di:cctu (Tech.')

Copy rU,-l'/af(.l~,~ t'or infllll1latiol1 tu \1r. Farooq A.1111::1,_Assist:llllEngineeri!:,! Ad,/iser-U, \'1/0 Housng & Works, v.;itll reference to ) is letter No.J(cl)/02-AI::A-ll/\Vlll, Lher! I.e.; !.It)t)-'i.

\-/

~ SHAHII' HA.\-lEED )k Dil', etar (Tech-I)