ACCEPTED

FORPR

OCESSIN

G-2020

Decem

ber47:14

AM-SC

PSC-2020-125-E

-Page1of6

The Public Service CommissionState of South Carolina

COMMISSIONERSJusun T. Wdhams, Smth Dtstnct

CharrntanFlorence P. Belser, Second Distnct

Vrce ChairCarolyn L. "Carolee" Williams, First District

Stephen M. "Mike" Caston, Third DistrictThomas J. "Tom" Ervin, Fourth District

Headen B. Thomas, Fifth DistrictDalton W. Powers, Jr., Seventh District

Jocelyn BoydChief Clerk/Executive Director

Phone: (803) 896-5100Fax: (803) 896-5246

Administrative DepartmentPhone: (803) 896-5100

Fax:(803) 896-5246

December 2, 2020

Dear Anthony G. Bryant:

This email is to acknowledge that the Public Service Commission of South Carolina has receivedyour Letter of Protest. Please be advised that your Letter of Protest will be placed in the Protestnl fth c ktlitddl d th C i i 'ait t~*.~ Docket No. 2020-125-E — Application of Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc. forAdjustment of Rates and Charges (See Commission Order No. 2020-313)

A Protestant is an individual objecting on the ground of private or public interest to the approvalof an Application, Petition, Motion or other matters which the Commission may have underconsideration. A Protestant may offer sworn testimony but cannot cross-examine witnessesoffered by other parties.

According to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, filing a Protest does not makeyou a Party of Record. A Protestant desiring to become an Intervenor (i.e., a Party of Record) in

a proceeding before the Commission may file a Petition for Intervention within the timeprescribed by the Commission.

You can follow this Docket and other daily filings made at the Commission by subscribing to theCommission's Email Subscriptionsat: htt s: dms. sc.sc. Ov Web Email; or you mayfollowspecifically Docket No. 2020-125-E at: htt s: dms. sc.sc. Ov Web Dockets Detail 117462.

If we may be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,

Becky Latimer

Public Service Commission, 101 Executive Center Dr., Suite 100, Columbia, SC 29210-8411, 803-896-5100, www.psc.sc.gov

ACCEPTED

FORPR

OCESSIN

G-2020

Decem

ber47:14

AM-SC

PSC-2020-125-E

-Page2of6

November 30, 2020

Clerk's Office

South Carolina Public Service Commission

101 Executive Center

Columbia South Carolina 29210

Re Docket Number 2020-12 E Dominion gne~ry Rate Increase

I Anthony G Bryant submit this public comment to the South Carolina Public Service Commission

regarding a Notice of a rate increase request by Dominion Energy under the Procedure of a Public

Hearing based upon approval, approval with condition, and/or denial by the South Carolina Public

Service Commission. Under Federal Trade Commission Act 2007-2008 Protecting Children in the 212stCentury upon South Carolina Public Service Commission receiving federal financial assistance under theCARES ACT regarding Title I Protecting Children il Deleting Online Predators, III Children's List brokerPrivacy requires a Public Hearing prior to South Carolina Department of Education allowed VirtualLearning under the guidance of Attorney General of the United States and Attorney General of SouthCarolina that can file a complaint under section 303 Administration and Enforcement and Section 304Actions by States within United States Distrjct Court of South Carolina ( Bryant v South Carolina PublicService Commission, Bryant v Attorney General of United States, Bryant v Attorney General of SouthCarolina ) due the fact that United States House of Representative and United States Senate did notprovide under the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 a Public Comment period under the CARES ACT.

Anthony G Bryant made public comment in 2012 regarding SCANA rate increase as well 2018 regardingmerger between SCANA and Dominion Energy not knowing I was a victim of Identity Theft NoticeInternal Revenue Service referred to Federal Trade CoJnmission and three credit bureaus as a result of

- — — &he public comment South.Carolina Attorney General settled aod received 875 million dollars iaJegaLfees in addition to 6 75 million from a federal agency during COVID 19 at $75 million dollars anapproximate total of $ 150 million in legal fees. Moreover a public comment was made by Anthony G

Bryant in 2013 regarding Housing and Urban Development Grant to the State of South Carolina leadstate agency South Carolina Department of Commerce regarding conflicts in need based criteria forexample a Corporation received a tax incentive but the County in which the Tier method was establishedfor the incentive to produce Economic Development netted a $ 50 million dollars lost from it's annualbudget while United States Department of Commerce census tract are used as a need criteria is

undermined every ten years in growing Cities and Counties leaving many paying 30 percent of theirearned income on rent with 70 percent of discretionary income being negotiated do to COVID 19 manyare subjected to Housing and Urban Development criteria of At Risk Homeless, Homeless, andChronically Homeless . In addition to Army Corp of Engineers was allocated 6 3 million dollars from theFederal Government to conduct a study on the impact of flooding within the City of Charleston for the

ACCEPTED

FORPR

OCESSIN

G-2020

Decem

ber47:14

AM-SC

PSC-2020-125-E

-Page3of6

record I Anthony G Bryant made public comment April 1, 2020 at the height of COVID 19 the City ofCharleston made a commitment to match 35 percent of the cost of a Mitigation Plan for flooding towardthe estimated cost of 5 1 billion dollars now in 2021 Budget the City of Charleston has a deficit of 18

percent did they City of Charleston make a False Claim to the Federal Government'? Dominion Energyhas made grants available for Not for Profit within the City of Charleston discounting a local Ordinancesince the 1930's during a time of Jim Crow Laws, Neighborhoods agreements that prevented non-whitesfrom purchasing home fortified by the 1937 Wagner Steagall Act were the City of Charleston hasreceived federal funding establishing Housing Authorities mandated to ensure that New Deal housingprograms for Americans to become permanent after the Great Depression the local ordinance providedfor the Planning Commission to have significant power regarding land use based on this historic

=prem~iand the pPeseitt IIIIay~partedTnaiig~a'ng th'ese fanrFusepailictes-supp orterhby a Legal==. -.--Opinion by our present Attorney General . Based upon the United States Senate Campaign costingaround 9100 million dollars with a State Budget about over $ 2 Billion I guess direct lobbyist will againdecide the fate of those suffering under the unintended consequences of impacts of COVID 19 and sincethis States is controlled by Free Market Republicans why cannot I have competition for my energyservice? Sorry for the misspelled words, single space, and improper page alignments.

Charleston South Carolina 29403

ACCEPTED

FORPR

OCESSIN

G-2020

Decem

ber47:14

AM-SC

PSC-2020-125-E

-Page4of6

State of South CarolinaDepartment of Revenue

Scan0014.jpg

'79 Pi 'AUTQs.D(G(T 29403 PLT(

Anthonv G. Br(/ant

ViartesGJI~T

I

RE( SCDOR Data Breach

Dear South Caroliua Taxpayer;

As you inny know, tax dnta at the soudt carr/iiuu Depuruuent of Revenue (scooR) wm eompmmised due (00 recce( security br'each. Ittlmedidq(ely upon discovering the data breach, ncw technology and policy protectionswere implemented at SCDOR to prevent further information exposure. We are writl ou toda ftrs toconfirm that — ns an eleclronic tax filer — our tax information was com romised and second to ence eon to take Immediate s s io rotect ourself aiust identi theft. A foredsic analysis of (he SCDOR's

datab'ase revealed that information compromised in this breach included aby South Carolina state tax returns fdedelectronically by businesses or individuals since 199g. The tax information (hat waS compromised includes socialsecurity numbers of you and your dependents, if )/ou claimed dependents ou a tax re(urn, and your bank accountnuinber

'ro 'ded scen t umber on ou e eci 'c e s . If your bank account number

was compromised, you should regularly review your monthly bank account statement aud your account online,and contact your bank immediately if you see any unexplained charges.

Weancouru e outotakeadvanta eofthefreeone earidentl theft Totection service rovidedb theState ofSouth Carolina. This se(vice is offered by Experian's Protec(MylD Alert program and includesidenuty theft resolution services that do not expire, a free credi( rcport, daay credit moni(or'ing.across three credi(bureaus to detect arty suspicious activity, aud an identity theft insurance policy, including coverage of electronictuud tmusfers from yo(tr bank account, worth up to a million dollarsr SCDOR is also pmviding pro(ectionservices for your minor dependents undef Expcrian'8 Family Securudl( program.

Please register for these services byvisi(ing ec 'dco scdor, andentezthe4g)ottdf)g.enrollmentcode: SCDOR123. If you do ho( have an Internal connection, call I eg66-57g-5422 to begin the eT(rottmant-- ---process. The enrollment rind ends March 31 2013. After you carol! in the proteeqMyID Alertprogram, you will be notified about how to enroll yom dependents in Experian's Family Secureg/ pmgram.

Also, please be aware that you can protect yourself against fraud and identity theft by placing a security freezeon your financial information. You Lun place, lift, or perm(inca(ly re(nova the security freeze free ef charge inSouth Carolina. When you place a freeze, someone who acquires your personal information witt not be able toopen new accounts or borrow money in your name. You will need to contact all three credil, bureaus to placethe freeze. Keep in mind that you will not be a)ale to borrow money or get inslant credit, new credit cArds,insurance, cell phoae service or other uiilihes until you temporarily lift or permanen(ly remove the freeze, andthat a freeze cannot be placed for children unless a credit fate has been opened on them {which is usuhlly a signof fraud). Contact info'rmation is:

Equi fax Severity FreezePXX Box lou/88Atlanta. GA 30348(-800-686-( ( l (

utmdmznsattiarcsarn

Earerian Security FreezeP.Q. Box 9334Allen. TX 73013lnr88-397-3742nun Xzueunlcnamaiasrn

TranaUnion LLCP.O. Box 6790Pullertow CA 92834-67901-888-909-8872tru/sL//ndxnunnaunimsnnt

We have been giving you information about the incident and how to protect yourself and your families in pressconferences and newspapers, on TV and on the internet s(arting the moment law enforcement gave uspermission to do so, and be assured that we wiII continue to do so. For more information on protectingyourself against identity theft, please contact the Department of Consumer Affair's at I -SOI)-922-1504 or visi(

a * r r ta u id, i i ~Lard%!leo.

ACCEPTED

FORPR

OCESSIN

G-2020

Decem

ber47:14

AM-SC

PSC-2020-125-E

-Page5of6

It's time to tacIgk dataprifiacynternet companies operatingin the Eu- sense thatCongressshouldaddress theserious,mpean Union had to begin compliance privacy issues raisedbymodern commun'ica-

May25withanewdataprivacylawthat tions.NothingliketheGDPRexistsinUS.law.requiresinternetproviderstoobtainthe Whenpacebookwasdisdosedtohaveallowed

"informed consent" of individuals before re- acontractortouseitssubscriberdatainhighlyquesting their persorial data. It is a sensible questionablewaysduringthe2016presidentialrule, but it has exposed major problems that campaign, Congressheldseveral daysofheav-'must be worked out. ings. But since then it has been silent.

The new General Data Protection Regula- ItmakessenseforCongresstowatchtheEu-tion puts Europ'e many steps ahead of the ropean experiment closelyand learn from itsUnited States'in addressing data privacy. All strengths and weaknesses before proposingmajor U.S. technology companies, includ- 'ew legislation for the protection ofAmeri-ing Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft and cans'nline privacy rights.Amazt7n„".say they-have=beenqueparinE to A new data privacy law ought to go beyondcomplywith the GDPR formonths. That has ensuring%atpegpTeurewelhuformedabout .

cost them billion ofdollars, according to U.S. the uses of their personal data before theyCommerce Secretary Wilbur Ross. Writing sign. up for internet or other services. Con-in the London Financial Times, he says the gress needs to draw some bright lines aroundnew regulation "creates serious, undear legal how information may be used, who can ac-

obligationsforbothprivate-andpublic-sector cessdetailsaboutindividuals,andunder whatentities, including the U.S. government. We conditions.do not have a dear understanding of what is Thereismuchtobe saidforextendingFourthrequired to comply." Amendmentprotectionagainst unreasonable

Mr. Ross wams that the uncertainties could search and seizure to manyforms ofpersonalinterrupt transatlantic trade in serious ways. information that nowmustbesur'rendered inFor example, he says, "Pharmaceutical corn- order to receive essential services.

paniesmaynotbe able to submitmedicaldata All valuable assets — like the pers8nal datafrom drug trials involving Europeah patients held by internet companies and the govern-to U.S. authorities,.which could delay the ap- ment — are subject to theft and misuse. The

. proval ofnew lifesaving drugs. The Centers government still has a long way to go in pro-for Disease Contml and Prevention could be tectingits

files againsthostilehacker,

whetherrestricted in sharing information with Euro- theybecriminalgangsorforeign~antspean counterparts while responding to the In addition,therehavebeen well-publicize,"'

outbreak-ofdiseases such as Ebola. And the incidents inwhichsensitivepersonalinformaUS. Postal Servicebelieves the new rules will tion in the possesuonoftheguv~~ZE,prevent EU pmtal operators from providing misused forpersonalorpolitical reasons. Con'the personal data on individuals it needs to greas should set new, stiffpenalties for viola

process inbound maiL" tions ofdataprivacythatapplynot onlytopfiAccording to Mr. Ross, law enforcement vate individualstakingadvantageofprivatel

could suffer because the GDPR will make it owned data but also government employe&

h'arder, ifnot impossible, to find out who is and personswhoknowinglypublishprotect(behind criminal and terrorist websites. privacydata.

Mr RossmakesthesensiblepointthatGDPR The data privacy debate has gotten off to

shguldbereformed,notdumped. Italso makes slow start. butthe heed for'action is growir

ACCEPTED

FORPR

OCESSIN

G-2020

Decem

ber47:14

AM-SC

PSC-2020-125-E

-Page6of6

SIDLE Df SDIIIII „'CDEDllllD ..

,GOVERNOR HENRY MCMRSTERl

TNOELRS S MVmarN, CNRXmu N

- =- &oa@-Ceolima43aabheferJEo)IIIIjII@am

COIVIMISSION MEETING

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2019FOUNDERS HALL - CHARLES TOWNE !ANDING

CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

AGENDA

10:50

10:40

WELCOME — THOMAS S. MULLIKIN, C+IAIR

TASK FORCE CHAIRS UPDATES .

12:15

0 12:30

REMARKS BY GOVERNOR HENRY MCMASTERR

LUNCH PROVIDED BY S.C. PRT

12:35 PRESENTATION BY (FORIVIER)4RAYOR )OE RILEY

12:45 PRESENTATION BY CHARLESTON MAYOR TECKLENBERG

1'.00 - CEREMONIAL PLANTING - SWEET GRASS FOR LIVING COASTUNE

1:30 'OUR OF NEW CHARLESTON CANAL (OPTIONAL)