t3 bl technology and the law

Upload: deepa-thangavelu

Post on 06-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    1/57

    Governing TechnologyGoverning Technologythrough Law:through Law:

    Issues and ConcernsIssues and ConcernsA. B. SurajA. B. Suraj

    PGP Business LawPGP Business Law20122012

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    2/57

    Session ObjectivesSession Objectives

    To appreciate the importance of and theTo appreciate the importance of and the

    criteria to recognize, establish andcriteria to recognize, establish andenforce intellectual property rightsenforce intellectual property rights

    To understand the prevalent legalTo understand the prevalent legalprinciples of Cyber Lawprinciples of Cyber Law

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    3/57

    Relevant IssuesRelevant Issues

    Lack of internationally coordinated legal frameworkLack of internationally coordinated legal frameworkor enforcement mechanismor enforcement mechanism Relevance of TRIPs and procedures; JurisdictionRelevance of TRIPs and procedures; Jurisdiction

    Regulating use of technology ever changingRegulating use of technology ever changingstandards and concernsstandards and concerns Uniformity in standardsUniformity in standards

    Emergence of specialized forms of legal institutionsEmergence of specialized forms of legal institutions Special Courts/TribunalsSpecial Courts/Tribunals

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    4/57

    Intellectual PropertyIntellectual Property

    RightsRights

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    5/57

    IPRs Basis & RationaleIPRs Basis & Rationale

    Economic (and technological) rationale Economic (and technological) rationale aids overall developmentaids overall development

    Social benefits enriches Public DomainSocial benefits enriches Public Domainand furthers Basic Researchand furthers Basic Research

    IPRs are legally monopolistic need to beIPRs are legally monopolistic need to befairly enforced/regulatedfairly enforced/regulated

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    6/57

    Forms of IPRsForms of IPRs

    Patents atents Patents Act, 1970Patents Act, 1970

    Copyrights opyrights Copyright Act, 1957Copyright Act, 1957 Trade Marks rade Marks Trade Marks Act, 1999Trade Marks Act, 1999 Industrial Designs ndustrial Designs Designs Act, 2000Designs Act, 2000

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    7/57

    Forms of IPRs Forms of IPRs

    Layout Designs of ICs ayout Designs of ICs SemiconductorSemiconductorIntegrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000

    Geographical Indications eographical Indications GeographicalGeographicalIndications of Goods (Registration andIndications of Goods (Registration andProtection) Act, 1999Protection) Act, 1999

    Plant varieties lant varieties Protection of PlantProtection of PlantVarieties and Farmers Rights Act, 2001Varieties and Farmers Rights Act, 2001

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    8/57

    Forms of IPRs Forms of IPRs

    Traditional Knowledge raditional Knowledge partly bypartly byBiological Diversity Act, 2002Biological Diversity Act, 2002

    Turmeric and Neem disputesTurmeric and Neem disputes

    Basmati and Yoga controversyBasmati and Yoga controversy

    Trade Secretsrade Secrets Contractual no Contractual nolegislation in Indialegislation in India

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    9/57

    Evolution of IPR regimeEvolution of IPR regime

    Early 17th Century Monopolies StatuteEarly 17th Century Monopolies Statute Maximum flexibility to national governments noMaximum flexibility to national governments no

    global enforcementglobal enforcement

    Commerce based; not invention as motiveCommerce based; not invention as motive

    Paris Convention (1883); Berne ConventionParis Convention (1883); Berne Convention(1886); Madrid Agreement (1891)(1886); Madrid Agreement (1891) Minimum obligations but with flexibilitiesMinimum obligations but with flexibilities

    National Treatment; and Reciprocal obligations National Treatment; and Reciprocal obligations though not mandatedthough not mandated

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    10/57

    TRIPs RegimeTRIPs Regime

    TRIPs (1995) RIPs (1995) common minimumcommon minimuminstitutional framework what aboutinstitutional framework what aboutflexibilities?flexibilities? Scope of Patentscope of Patents exclusions exclusions Patentabil ity criteriaatentabil ity criteria interpretative interpretative

    contentcontent

    Enforcement mechanismsnforcement mechanisms Civil and Civil andCriminal remediesCriminal remedies

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    11/57

    TRIPs Regime TRIPs Regime

    Salient FeaturesSalient Features Basic Principlesasic Principles

    MFN status; National TreatmentMFN status; National Treatment

    Forms of IPRs and bases oforms of IPRs and bases ofprotectionrotectionAiming for uniformityAiming for uniformity

    Multilateralism impact on national lawsMultilateralism impact on national laws

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    12/57

    TRIPs Features TRIPs Features

    Special Provisions for Developingpecial Provisions for DevelopingnationsationsAccent on technology transfer & promotionAccent on technology transfer & promotion

    Enforcement Mechanismsnforcement Mechanisms Civil and Criminal; Border measuresCivil and Criminal; Border measures

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    13/57

    What is a Patent?What is a Patent?

    Patent a monopoly right to an inventorPatent a monopoly right to an inventor

    20 year period of monopoly granted for20 year period of monopoly granted forinventions that satisfy:inventions that satisfy:

    Noveltyovelty Inventive Step or Non-obviousnessnventive Step or Non-obviousness Util ity or industrial applicationtil ity or industrial application

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    14/57

    What can you do with aWhat can you do with a

    Patent?Patent? Section 48 of the Patents Act, 1970:Section 48 of the Patents Act, 1970:

    MakeMake

    UseUse

    SellSell DistributeDistribute

    ImportImport

    the invention within Indiathe invention within India

    Effect of Patents only territorialEffect of Patents only territorial

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    15/57

    Patent Law in IndiaPatent Law in India

    The Patents Act, 1970The Patents Act, 1970

    The Patents Rules, 2003The Patents Rules, 2003

    Registering Authority Registering Authority Controller General ofController General ofPatents, Designs and Trade MarksPatents, Designs and Trade Marks HO at HO at

    Kolkata Branches at Chennai, Delhi & MumbaiKolkata Branches at Chennai, Delhi & Mumbai

    Registration no guarantee of validityRegistration no guarantee of validity

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    16/57

    Subject Matter ofSubject Matter of

    PatentsPatents Must relate to any new process and/or aMust relate to any new process and/or a

    new product improvements alsonew product improvements alsoconsidered across any field ofconsidered across any field of

    technology (TRIPs)technology (TRIPs)

    Any process, machine, manufacture, Any process, machine, manufacture,composition of matter or materialcomposition of matter or material

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    17/57

    Non-patentabilityNon-patentability

    Exclusions abstract ideas, laws of nature,Exclusions abstract ideas, laws of nature,natural phenomenanatural phenomena

    Section 3 enlists :Section 3 enlists : Medical & Treatment procedures;Medical & Treatment procedures; Topography of ICs;Topography of ICs; Traditional Knowledge;Traditional Knowledge;

    Mathematical or Business methods;Mathematical or Business methods;

    Computer programsComputer programs per seper seor algorithms;or algorithms;

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    18/57

    US Case StudiesUS Case Studies

    Gottschalk v. Benson (1972) NO Gottschalk v. Benson (1972) NO unless there is a physical effectunless there is a physical effect

    Diamond v. Diehr (1981) YES if part ofDiamond v. Diehr (1981) YES if part ofan otherwise patentable processan otherwise patentable process

    State Street Bank (1998) YES usefulState Street Bank (1998) YES usefulcomputation is in itself a tangible resultcomputation is in itself a tangible result

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    19/57

    Patent CooperationPatent Cooperation

    Treaty (PCT)Treaty (PCT) Treaty for International Rationalization andTreaty for International Rationalization and

    Cooperation in:Cooperation in: Filing;Filing;

    Searching;Searching;

    Examination; of Patent specificationsExamination; of Patent specifications

    Dissemination of technical information contained inDissemination of technical information contained invarious applicationsvarious applications

    No grant of international patents proceduralNo grant of international patents proceduralfacilitation ultimate grant by countries onlyfacilitation ultimate grant by countries only

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    20/57

    Patent ApplicationsPatent Applications

    Who can apply for a Patent?Who can apply for a Patent?True and first inventor principle idea,True and first inventor principle idea,

    effort and disclosureeffort and disclosure

    An assignee of rightAn assignee of right Legal representativeLegal representative

    Firms/Corporations cannot be inventorsFirms/Corporations cannot be inventors but can apply as assignees or joint but can apply as assignees or jointholdersholders

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    21/57

    Employee EmployerEmployee Employer

    relationsrelations Mere contract of employment does not ordinarilyMere contract of employment does not ordinarily

    provide any rights to the employerprovide any rights to the employer

    Principle of Trusteeship and fiduciary duty mustPrinciple of Trusteeship and fiduciary duty mustbe established by the employerbe established by the employer

    If specially employed to exercise inventiveIf specially employed to exercise inventivefaculty then employer is the assignee evenfaculty then employer is the assignee evenover the patentable improvements developedover the patentable improvements developed

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    22/57

    Employee Employer Employee Employer

    If specially employed for a purpose butIf specially employed for a purpose butthe invention is not pursuant to it thenthe invention is not pursuant to it thenthe employee owns itthe employee owns it

    Comprehensive factual analysis natureComprehensive factual analysis natureand scope of employment; obligations andand scope of employment; obligations andduties arising thereof; conduct ofduties arising thereof; conduct ofemployer and employee; extent of trustemployer and employee; extent of trust

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    23/57

    Employer Employee Employer Employee

    UK Patents Act, 1977 Ss. 39-43UK Patents Act, 1977 Ss. 39-43 Reasonably expected of normal dutiesReasonably expected of normal duties

    Special or assigned obligationsSpecial or assigned obligations

    Fair compensation to the inventor employee Fair compensation to the inventor employee

    provided no such specific contract existsprovided no such specific contract exists

    Effort and Skill based evaluationEffort and Skill based evaluation

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    24/57

    Effect of Prior DisclosureEffect of Prior Disclosure

    USPTO allows for Disclosure Documents USPTO allows for Disclosure Documents accepted and preserved for 2 yearsaccepted and preserved for 2 years Evidence of date of conception of inventionEvidence of date of conception of invention

    No effect of an applicationNo effect of an application

    Confidentiality ensuredConfidentiality ensured

    Declaration of diligence also mandatedDeclaration of diligence also mandated

    India strongly discourages prior publication orIndia strongly discourages prior publication ordisclosure results in anticipation prefersdisclosure results in anticipation prefersProvisional ApplicationProvisional Application

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    25/57

    Specifications KeySpecifications Key

    StrategiesStrategies Legal, Technical, Commercial strategic draftingLegal, Technical, Commercial strategic drafting

    of terms required to meet future demandsof terms required to meet future demands

    Corresponding rights of persons involved mustCorresponding rights of persons involved mustbe clarified else, heavy legal suitsbe clarified else, heavy legal suits

    Distinguish between old and the newDistinguish between old and the new

    Summarize each stage effectively this is apartSummarize each stage effectively this is apartfrom an overall Abstractfrom an overall Abstract

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    26/57

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    27/57

    Remedies and StrategiesRemedies and Strategies

    Suit for DamagesSuit for Damages

    Suit for Account on Profits and forSuit for Account on Profits and fordamages to be assesseddamages to be assessed

    Demand security for value of claim andDemand security for value of claim andcostscosts

    Injunction at the end of the trialInjunction at the end of the trial Though not usually granted, even interimThough not usually granted, even interiminjunctioninjunction

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    28/57

    WHAT IS COPYRIGHT?WHAT IS COPYRIGHT?

    Statutorily provided privilege to authors,tatutorily provided privilege to authors,aiming towards:iming towards: Creative and Intellectual enrichment of the publicCreative and Intellectual enrichment of the public

    Progress of Scientific and useful Arts (literary, artistic,Progress of Scientific and useful Arts (literary, artistic,musical, dramatic, cinematographic films, soundmusical, dramatic, cinematographic films, soundrecordings and now performances & broadcasting)recordings and now performances & broadcasting)

    Copyleft emerging notions of open accessCopyleft emerging notions of open access

    Bundle of rightsundle of rights right to make copies; right to make copies;communicate to the public; make adaptationscommunicate to the public; make adaptationsand allow translationsand allow translations

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    29/57

    Notions of OriginalityNotions of Originality

    Common Law what is not copied, isCommon Law what is not copied, isoriginaloriginal

    US & Australia minimum criteria ofUS & Australia minimum criteria ofcreativity and originalitycreativity and originality

    Moving towards authors own personalMoving towards authors own personalcreation apart from common stockcreation apart from common stock

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    30/57

    Basic ConceptsBasic Concepts

    Authorship & Ownershiputhorship & Ownership labour, skill labour, skilland judgement could be even jointand judgement could be even joint

    Films, song-recordings, broadcasts Films, song-recordings, broadcasts entrepreneurship model producersentrepreneurship model producers

    Song lyricist, composer, singer, performingSong lyricist, composer, singer, performing

    musicians, and the producermusicians, and the producer Government presumed ownership, unlessGovernment presumed ownership, unless

    contracted otherwisecontracted otherwise

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    31/57

    Moral Rights to theMoral Rights to the

    AuthorAuthor Right to be acknowledged and against anyRight to be acknowledged and against any

    false attributionfalse attribution

    Right against derogatory treatment of theRight against derogatory treatment of theworkwork

    Enforceable even if economic rights haveEnforceable even if economic rights havebeen assigned or licensedbeen assigned or licensed

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    32/57

    Legal FrameworkLegal Framework

    Registration not compulsory, but usefulRegistration not compulsory, but usefulwhen copyright is infringed - territorialwhen copyright is infringed - territorial

    Indian Copyright Act, 1957Indian Copyright Act, 1957

    International recognition:International recognition: Berne Convention (1886) andBerne Convention (1886) and

    Universal Copyright Convention (1952)Universal Copyright Convention (1952)

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    33/57

    Civil & CriminalCivil & Criminal

    RemediesRemedies Evidentiary registration is best proof Evidentiary registration is best proof

    else, presumptions based on publicationelse, presumptions based on publication

    Civil remedy enforceable by a DistrictCivil remedy enforceable by a DistrictCourt compensatory and injunctionsCourt compensatory and injunctions

    Criminal remedy Metropolitan MagistrateCriminal remedy Metropolitan Magistrateor the JMFC minimum imprisonment andor the JMFC minimum imprisonment andfines offence is cognizablefines offence is cognizable

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    34/57

    Fair Use and DefencesFair Use and Defences

    Berne Convention and TRIPs authorizeBerne Convention and TRIPs authorizereproduction of protected works inreproduction of protected works incertain special cases if:certain special cases if:

    - it does not conflict with normal- it does not conflict with normalexploitation of the work; andexploitation of the work; and

    - it does not unreasonably prejudice the- it does not unreasonably prejudice thelegitimate interests of the authorlegitimate interests of the author

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    35/57

    Some instances of FairSome instances of Fair

    useuse For Research or Private StudyFor Research or Private Study

    For criticism or reviewFor criticism or review

    For reporting current eventsFor reporting current events

    For Non-commercial performancesFor Non-commercial performances

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    36/57

    Fair Use Factors in U.K.Fair Use Factors in U.K.

    Quantum and value of the matter quotedQuantum and value of the matter quoted

    Purpose Good Faith?Purpose Good Faith?

    Whether the work is published, circulated or notWhether the work is published, circulated or not

    Likelihood of competitionLikelihood of competition

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    37/57

    Fair Use Factors in U.S.Fair Use Factors in U.S.

    Purpose and Character of usePurpose and Character of use

    The nature of the Copyrighted workThe nature of the Copyrighted work

    Amount and substantiality of useAmount and substantiality of use

    The effect on potential market or valueThe effect on potential market or value

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    38/57

    Relevant DebatesRelevant Debates

    Trade secrets vs. Patents/CopyrightsTrade secrets vs. Patents/Copyrights

    Enforcement mechanisms highlyEnforcement mechanisms highlyprocedural; and evidentiaryprocedural; and evidentiary

    Emergence of and Compliance withEmergence of and Compliance withInternational consensusInternational consensus

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    39/57

    CYBER LAWS,CYBER LAWS,E-GOVERNANCE &E-GOVERNANCE &

    DATA PROTECTIONDATA PROTECTION

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    40/57

    Geography, is History!Geography, is History!

    Contracts & Commerce in Cyberspace andContracts & Commerce in Cyberspace andin Electronic formatin Electronic format

    Detection, Investigation and ProsecutionDetection, Investigation and Prosecutionof Cyber Crimes across the globeof Cyber Crimes across the globe

    Re-appreciation of legal principles Re-appreciation of legal principles jurisdiction, privacy, IPRs, evidence, etc.jurisdiction, privacy, IPRs, evidence, etc.

    IT L Obj &

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    41/57

    IT Law Objects &IT Law Objects &

    ConcernsConcerns To provide privacy and guarantee security inTo provide privacy and guarantee security in

    public and unregulated spacepublic and unregulated space

    To authenticate and authorize transactionsTo authenticate and authorize transactionsundertaken across several countriesundertaken across several countries

    To keep the legal framework in pace with theTo keep the legal framework in pace with thechanging forms of technologychanging forms of technology

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    42/57

    Online PiracyOnline Piracy

    RIAA v. Charter Comm.IAA v. Charter Comm. (2005 USCoA)(2005 USCoA) P2P; MP3 technology enabled piracyP2P; MP3 technology enabled piracy

    2.6 billion music works in a month!2.6 billion music works in a month!

    John Doe suits and summonsJohn Doe suits and summons

    Disclosure of subscriber detailsDisclosure of subscriber details

    Safe harbour (DMCA, 2000) for ISPs = mere transmit andSafe harbour (DMCA, 2000) for ISPs = mere transmit androute; system caching temporary storage; user determinedroute; system caching temporary storage; user determinedprocess; mere provision of links prompt action uponprocess; mere provision of links prompt action uponnotificationnotification

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    43/57

    Online Piracy Online Piracy

    Contributory liability only if:Contributory liability only if: Reasonable knowledge of infringementReasonable knowledge of infringement

    Expected knowledge of storage on siteExpected knowledge of storage on site

    Fails to prevent viral distributionFails to prevent viral distribution

    Due diligence given prominence inDue diligence given prominence inIndian Law Intermediaries liabilityIndian Law Intermediaries liability

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    44/57

    Legal FrameworkLegal Framework

    Information Technology Act, 2000Information Technology Act, 2000 Latest AmendmentsLatest Amendments

    Procedural and EvidentiaryProcedural and Evidentiary

    UNCITRAL Model Law on E-Commerce, 1996UNCITRAL Model Law on E-Commerce, 1996

    Convention on Cyber Crimes EU+ MembersConvention on Cyber Crimes EU+ Members

    US Acts and EU DirectivesUS Acts and EU Directives

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    45/57

    E-GovernanceE-Governance

    Recognizes electronic records andRecognizes electronic records andsignatures as valid formssignatures as valid forms

    Government can accept, issue, create,Government can accept, issue, create,retain and preserve records electronicallyretain and preserve records electronically

    though not mandatorily though not mandatorily

    Mandate of the Right to Information ActMandate of the Right to Information Act

    E R d d

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    46/57

    E-Record andE-Record and

    Contractual PrinciplesContractual Principles

    Attribution PrinciplesAttribution Principles Originator/representative/automaticOriginator/representative/automatic

    Acknowledgement conditionsAcknowledgement conditions

    Notice of acceptanceNotice of acceptance

    Time and Place of despatch of e-recordTime and Place of despatch of e-record

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    47/57

    Secured TransactionsSecured Transactions

    Government prescribes the security procedure Government prescribes the security procedure considering the technological capacity of theconsidering the technological capacity of theParties; volume of transactions; and generalParties; volume of transactions; and general

    proceduresprocedures

    Certifying Authorities (licensed):Certifying Authorities (licensed): Issues Electronic/Digital Signature CertificatesIssues Electronic/Digital Signature Certificates

    Recognizes foreign Certifying AuthoritiesRecognizes foreign Certifying Authorities

    Repository of Certificates and PKIRepository of Certificates and PKI

    C b C i dC b C i d

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    48/57

    Cyber Crimes andCyber Crimes and

    PenaltiesPenalties Section 43 damage to computer orSection 43 damage to computer or

    computer system destroy, alter, delete,computer system destroy, alter, delete,add, modify or rearrange any computeradd, modify or rearrange any computer

    resource Fines up to Rs. 1 Crore !!resource Fines up to Rs. 1 Crore !!Penalty to CompensationPenalty to Compensation

    Factual factors = unfair advantage;Factual factors = unfair advantage;amount of loss caused; the repetitiveamount of loss caused; the repetitivenaturenature

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    49/57

    Cyber OffencesCyber Offences

    Tampering computer source code or relatedTampering computer source code or relateddocuments 3 yrs + 2 lakhsdocuments 3 yrs + 2 lakhs

    Hacking into computer resource 3 yrs + 2Hacking into computer resource 3 yrs + 2lakhslakhs

    Publishing or transmitting obscene material inPublishing or transmitting obscene material in

    electronic form = 5 yrs + 10 lakhelectronic form = 5 yrs + 10 lakh

    Extra-territoriality application of the law ifExtra-territoriality application of the law ifIndian computer is involvedIndian computer is involved

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    50/57

    Latest AmendmentsLatest Amendments

    DATA PROTECTION & PRIVACYATA PROTECTION & PRIVACY Compensatory remedy = up to 5 CroresCompensatory remedy = up to 5 Crores

    Applicable to body corporate (commercial or professional Applicable to body corporate (commercial or professional

    activities);activities);

    Reasonable security procedures;Reasonable security procedures;

    Protection of sensitive personal data/ informationProtection of sensitive personal data/ information

    Disclosure of confidential information penalizedDisclosure of confidential information penalized

    Violation of Privacy made punishable even in the IPCViolation of Privacy made punishable even in the IPC

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    51/57

    Latest amendments Latest amendments

    Punishments identity theft, phishing,Punishments identity theft, phishing,cyber terrorismcyber terrorism

    Critical information infrastructure Critical information infrastructure essential to protect national interestsessential to protect national interests

    Indian Computer Emergency ResponseIndian Computer Emergency ResponseTeam formedTeam formed

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    52/57

    Latest amendments Latest amendments

    Electronic Signature inclusive of DigitalElectronic Signature inclusive of Digital

    Definition of Cyber Caf; Cyber Security; Computer sourceDefinition of Cyber Caf; Cyber Security; Computer sourcecodecode

    Elaborates intermediary = ISPs, cyber cafes, telecomElaborates intermediary = ISPs, cyber cafes, telecomSPs, Network SPs, Search Engines, E-Com sites, etc.SPs, Network SPs, Search Engines, E-Com sites, etc.

    Power of Govt. to authorize/order any private individual orPower of Govt. to authorize/order any private individual orfirm to provide services in an electronic form servicefirm to provide services in an electronic form servicecharges may also be specifiedcharges may also be specified

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    53/57

    Latest amendments Latest amendments

    Security procedures and practices asSecurity procedures and practices asGovt. considers appropriateGovt. considers appropriate

    Formation of Examiner of ElectronicFormation of Examiner of ElectronicEvidence guarantee of expert opinionEvidence guarantee of expert opinion

    Audit of Electronic records expressly Audit of Electronic records expresslyallowedallowed

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    54/57

    Latest amendments Latest amendments

    Working of Cyber Appellate Tribunal Working of Cyber Appellate Tribunal techno-legal characteristicstechno-legal characteristics

    Creation of Cyber Regulations AdvisoryCreation of Cyber Regulations AdvisoryCommitteeCommittee

    Grounds of sovereignty Govt. hasGrounds of sovereignty Govt. haspowers to intercept/ monitor/ decrypt anypowers to intercept/ monitor/ decrypt anyinformation on computer resourceinformation on computer resource

    Liabilit ofLiability of

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    55/57

    Liability ofLiability of

    IntermediariesIntermediaries Service Providers are exempted from liability ifService Providers are exempted from liability if

    lack of knowledge despite due diligencelack of knowledge despite due diligence

    Service Providers can be ordered to preserveService Providers can be ordered to preserveand retain informationand retain information Full cooperation is legally mandatedFull cooperation is legally mandated

    Comprehensive Search & Seizure Powers givenComprehensive Search & Seizure Powers givento the Policeto the Police

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    56/57

    Jurisdiction IssuesJurisdiction Issues

    Conduct of activity wholly or substantially Conduct of activity wholly or substantially within a territorywithin a territory

    Conduct outside the territory but directedConduct outside the territory but directedagainst the interests of the countryagainst the interests of the country

    Standard of reasonableness applied Active,Standard of reasonableness applied Active,Passive, Territoriality, SovereigntyPassive, Territoriality, Sovereignty Yahoo Inc. matter French Law vs. Rights in USYahoo Inc. matter French Law vs. Rights in US

  • 8/2/2019 T3 BL Technology and the Law

    57/57

    DiscussionDiscussion