table of contents and possible messages - iaea.org · tm for ms review, 28-30 may infrastructure...
TRANSCRIPT
Revising Milestones in the Development of a National Infrastructure for
Nuclear Power (NG-G-3.1)
Alan McDonald
4 February 2014, Vienna
Outline
• Reasons for revising
• Timeline
• Instructions
• Input from this meeting
Milestones Document (NG-G-3.1)
Milestones Approach (1/3) Phase 1:
Decide! Phase 2:
Prepare! Phase 3:
Construct!
Milestones Approach (2/3)
10 – 15 years
19 issues
• National position • Nuclear safety • Management • Funding and financing • Legislative framework • Safeguards • Regulatory framework • Radiation protection • Electrical grid • Human resources
development
• Stakeholder involvement • Site and supporting
facilities • Environmental protection • Emergency planning • Security and physical
protection • Nuclear fuel cycle • Radioactive waste • Industrial involvement • Procurement
Reasons for revising
• IAEA practice of regular reviews and, if needed, revisions
• Experience from INIR missions • More detailed IAEA documents on some of the 19
issues • Lessons learned from Fukushima • Changed strategic environment
– Not all newcomers using competitive bidding – More interest in alternative contracting and
ownership (e.g. BOO)
Deadline for nominations, 20 Mar.
8
Timeline
A few consultancies
Finalize draft for publication
Finalize draft for MS review
TM for MS review, 28-30 May
Infrastructure Workshop
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
2013 2014
Internal consultations & drafting
Technical Meeting to review the Milestone document
• 28-30 May 2014
• Nomination deadline: 20 March
My instructions (1/2)
• Keep basic structure – 3 milestones, 19 issues – Except for Milestone 2, milestones and issues stay the
same
• Keep changes minimal and length the same • Priorities
– Make consistent with revision of INIR evaluation methodology, Evaluation of the Status of National Nuclear Infrastructure Development NG-T-3.2Addendum 1
– Make adjustments recommended by July 2013 consultancy – Take into account comments made by interested Member
States and Agency staff
My instructions (2/2)
– Harmonize with • Working Paper on the implications of Fukushima for the Milestones
document • draft TECDOC on Alternative Contracting and Ownership Approaches • briefs on Issue 1, “National Position” • SSG-16, Establishing the Safety Infrastructure for a Nuclear Power
Programme • Nuclear Security Series No. 19 on establishing nuclear security
infrastructure • NG-T-3.6 on the NEPIO • guidance for INIR missions • NG-T-3.7 on managing siting • EPR-EMBARKING 2012 on Emergency Preparedness and Response for
newcomers • Draft on Environmental Impact Assessment • NP-T-1.10 on reactor technology assessment
Possible Discussion Points
• How to deal with alternative approaches to competitive bidding?
• When should separate organizations be created and how fast should they expand?
• When and how fast should the regulator transition to ‘independence’ and how distant from rest of the process?
• More of a distinction between funding and financing? More about government financing roles and responsibilities?
• More about Phase 3, and, if so, what? • Evolution of the NEPIO? • Differentiating owner and operator responsibilities? • ….