table of contents - cedar corp. · • 2.5-inch upper layer, pg 58-28 (nominal aggregate size: 12.5...

October 2011 Pavement Type Selection Report

ID 6767-06-00 Kennedy Ave to USH 10 EB, CTH B, Portage County, Wisconsin

L:\work\Projects\60145536\400_Technical\406_Civil\406.2_Roadways\Pavement\pav_type_select_rpt_jte.docx i

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................ 2 Existing Facility ....................................................................................................... 2 Pavement Condition ................................................................................................ 2 TRAFFIC DATA ............................................................................................................ 3 SOIL PARAMETERS .................................................................................................... 3 ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................... 4 Alternative No. 1 – HMA Pavement ........................................................................ 4 Alternative No. 2 – PCC Pavement ......................................................................... 4 Existing Pavement Structure ................................................................................... 4 LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS ................................................................................... 4 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONSIDERATIONS ...................................................... 4 Pulverize and Relay Area ........................................................................................ 5 Reconstruction Area ................................................................................................ 5 Side Roads .............................................................................................................. 5

LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Project Location Map 2 Existing and Proposed Pavement Typical Sections 3 Traffic Forecast 4 Soils Analysis 5 WisPave Pavement Design Computations 6 WisPave LCCA Worksheets



L:\work\Projects\60145536\400_Technical\406_Civil\406.2_Roadways\Pavement\pav_type_select_rpt_jte.docx 1

PAVEMENT TYPE SELECTION REPORT

PROJECT I.D. 6767-06-00 STOCKTON - AMHERST

KENNEDY AVE TO USH 10 EB CTH B

PORTAGE COUNTY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed project involves reconditioning of approximately 6.3 miles of CTH B in the Towns of Stockton and Amherst, Portage County, from approximately 1,700 feet east of Kennedy Avenue to approximately 1,400 feet west of the eastbound USH 10 ramps. The intersection of CTH B and CTH J and the section of roadway between Lime Lake Road and Kubisiak Road are not included in this project (see Exhibit 1 - Project Location Map). Due to the varying soil types and traffic loadings, this project will have four separate typical sections: two pulverize and relay sections, which will be the majority of the project length, and two reconstruction sections. Two reconstruction areas within the project limits will be at the intersection of CTH B and Custer Road and the intersection of CTH B and CTH K. Each of these areas will have a separate typical section. We recommend the pulverize and relay area consist of removing a portion (approximately 2 inches) of the existing asphalt, pulverizing the remainder of the existing asphalt and 2 inches of the existing base course, and placing new HMA Pavement on top. The pavement sections are as follows: For the pulverize and relay section from Station 32+50 to Station 295+00, excluding the reconstruction area at Custer Road: • 6-inches HMA Pavement Type E-10

• 2.5-inch upper layer, PG 58-28 (nominal aggregate size: 12.5 mm) • 3.5-inch lower layer, PG 58-28 (nominal aggregate size: 19.0 mm)

• 2.0 inches existing base course, 10.0 inches existing asphalt; pulverized and relaid.

• 4.0 inches existing granular subgrade

• Shoulders will be 4 foot HMA paved to match mainline thickness, and 2 foot gravel.

For the pulverize and relay section from Station 321+00 to Station 478+00: • 5-inches HMA Pavement Type E-3







• Shoulders will be 4 foot HMA paved to match mainline thickness, and 2 foot gravel. We recommend the reconstruction area consist of completely removing the existing asphalt pavement and base and reconstructing a new pavement structure. The pavement sections are as follows: For the reconstruction at Custer Road, this includes CTH B from Station 170+00 to Station 181+00, and the acceleration lane: • 6-inches HMA Pavement Type E-10

• 2.5-inch upper layer, o PG 58-28 (nominal aggregate size: 12.5 mm) o PG 70-28, HMA Pavement Type E-30, within intersection

• 3.5-inch lower layer, PG 58-28 (nominal aggregate size: 19.0 mm) • 15 inches Base Aggregate Dense 1¼ inch.


For the reconstruction at CTH K, this includes CTH B from Station 295+00 to Station 321+00: • 6.0-inches HMA Pavement Type E-10


• 18 inches Base Aggregate Dense 1¼ inch.

• 6 inches Granular Sub-base


These sections were selected based on a life cycle cost analysis and to keep consistency of pavement layer thicknesses and type of construction throughout the project length.

The proposed rural typical section will consist of 12-foot travel lanes, with 6-foot shoulders (4-feet paved with HMA) in each direction (see Exhibit 2 - Existing and Proposed Pavement Typical Sections). During construction operations, the roadway will be open to local traffic only. Truck traffic and through traffic will be detoured during all phases of this project. A detour route has not been established at this time, as discussions with Portage County are still ongoing.




Currently, expected pavement-related special provisions include QMP Base Aggregate, QMP Ride, Incentive IRI Ride, QMP HMA Pavement Nuclear Density, and Incentive Density HMA Pavement, and HMA Pavement Intersections. The HMA Pavement Intersections special will only apply to the Custer Road and CTH B intersection. This special provision will be used to accommodate the high volume of truck traffic that turns through this intersection. This project is a rural local road project. CTH B has a posted speed limit of 55 mph, and a design year AADT of 6,550 vehicles per day between Kennedy Avenue and CTH K, and 4,350 vehicles per day between CTH K and USH 10. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project involves the reconditioning of approximately 6.8 miles of CTH B in the Towns of Stockton and Amherst, Portage County, from approximately 1,700 feet east of Kennedy Avenue to approximately 1,400 feet west of the eastbound USH 10 ramps. The intersection of CTH B and CTH J and the section of roadway between Lime Lake Road and Kubisiak Road are not included in this project. The purpose of the project is to recondition the roadway and replace the deteriorated pavement. The project will upgrade the roadway to rural 3R roadway standards. The road is functionally classified as a major collector. The proposed design class for the project is 3RC3. CTH B has a posted speed limit of 55 miles per hour (mph) (design speed 55 mph) through the project limits. Existing Facility The current two-lane roadway consists of a rural section with a roadway width of 36 feet. The original construction year for this section of roadway is 1956. There was a HMA Pavement overlay done in 2002. Project pavement coring logs indicate asphaltic thicknesses are approximately 10 - 12 inches. Sand and gravel fill was encountered below the asphalt. Pavement Condition CTH B has a 2009 Paser Rating of 6. The Concept Definition Report identifies the pavement as deteriorated. The pavement is failing and has reached the end of its serviceable life. TRAFFIC DATA The traffic forecast performed by the WisDOT Traffic Forecasting Section is included in Exhibit 3. Traffic values for pavement design are shown in the table below:

Roadway Section Year

2012 AADT (Construction Year)

2032 AADT (Design Year)

CTH B (Kennedy Ave. to CTH K) 5200 6550 CTH B (CTH K to USH 10) 3450 4350




Percent ADT Truck Type Kennedy Avenue to CTH K CTH K to USH 10

2D 7.6 7.4 3-SU 6.4 2.9

2S-1, 2S-2 6.2 4.0 3S-2 3.2 4.9

DBL BTM 0.0 0.0 Total 23.4 19.2

The directional factor (DF) is 0.6 and a lane distribution factor (LDF) is 1. The following table shows the design year (2032) equivalent single axle loads (ESALs) on CTH B.

HMA Pavement ESALs Concrete Pavement ESALs Sta. 32+50 –

Sta. 321+00 Sta. 321+00 – Sta. 478+00

Sta. 32+50 – Sta. 321+00

Sta. 321+00 – Sta. 478+00

Design Lane Daily ESALs 473 256 663 374 Design Lane Total Life ESALs 3,452,900 1,868,800 4,839,900 2,730,200

SOIL PARAMETERS The different types of soils expected to be found in this project and their respective lengths along the project were determined using the Soil Survey of Portage County (see Exhibit 4 – Soils Analysis). Using WisDOT Geotechnical Bulletin No. 1, the design group index (DGI) was determined for the appropriate horizon for each soil type. The soils were then grouped together based on location, DGI, and traffic loadings. The highest DGI was used to determine the Soil Support Value. The remainder of the soil parameters was derived using the WisDOT pavement design software, WisPAVE. Based on preliminary design and the soils analysis, no constructability concerns have been identified. The engineering pavement design parameters for native soils are as follows:

Sta. 32+50 – Sta. 295+00

CTH B & Custer Road Reconstruction

CTH B & CTH K Reconstruction

Sta. 321+00 – Sta. 478+00

Soil Support Value 3.9 5.4 4.2 3.9

Design Group Index 14 2 12 14

Frost Index F-3 F-2 F-3 F-3 Subgrade Modulus, K 125 300 150 125




ALTERNATIVES The objective of this pavement design is to recondition the pavement structure to a rural section with 6-foot shoulder. The intersections with Custer Road and CTH K will reconstructed because of the deficient vertical curves at these intersections. Both intersections currently have limited sight distances from the intersections, which have resulted in accidents. Two alternatives for each segment, one flexible and one rigid, were developed for the new pavement surface for the project; pavement design computations for each alternative are shown in Exhibit 5. The alternatives for each segment are described as follows: Station 32+50 – 295+00, excluding the reconstruction area at Custer Road:

Alternative No. 1 – HMA Pavement

• 6.0 inches HMA Pavement Type E-10 • 10.0 inches existing base course, 2.0 inches existing asphalt; pulverized and relaid. • 4.0 inches existing granular subbase • Shoulders will be 4 foot HMA paved to match mainline thickness, and 2 foot gravel.

Alternative No. 2 – PCC Pavement

• 9.0 inches Portland Cement Concrete • Existing asphalt pavement structure • Shoulders will be 4 foot PCC paved to match mainline thickness, and 2 foot gravel.

Station 321+00 – 478+00:


• 5.0 inches HMA Pavement Type E-3 • 10.0 inches existing base course, 2.0 inches existing asphalt; pulverized and relaid. • 4.0 inches existing granular subbase • Shoulders will be 4 foot HMA paved to match mainline thickness, and 2 foot gravel.


• 8.5 inches Portland Cement Concrete • Existing asphalt pavement structure • Shoulders will be 4 foot PCC paved to match mainline thickness, and 2 foot gravel.




Custer Road Intersection reconstruction:


• 6.0 inches HMA Pavement Type E-10 (Type E-30 for surface layer within intersection) • 15.0 inches Base Aggregate Dense 1 ¼ Inch. • Shoulders will be 4 foot HMA paved to match mainline thickness, and 2 foot gravel.


• 8.5 inches Portland Cement Concrete • 6.0 inches Base Aggregate Dense 1 ¼ Inch. • Shoulders will be 4 foot PCC paved to match mainline thickness, and 2 foot gravel.

CTH K Intersection reconstruction:


• 6 inches HMA Pavement Type E-10 • 18.0 inches Base Aggregate Dense 1 ¼ Inch. • 6 inches granular sub-base • Shoulders will be 4 foot HMA paved to match mainline thickness, and 2 foot gravel.


• 9.0 inches Portland Cement Concrete • 6.0 inches Base Aggregate Dense 1 ¼ Inch. • Shoulders will be 4 foot PCC paved to match mainline thickness, and 2 foot gravel.

Existing Pavement Structure WisDOT standard specifications allow the contractor to use recycled materials to produce base courses, asphalt, and concrete on all projects. The existing base does not meet the requirements for WisDOT base courses. Existing asphalt can be recycled for the project and incorporated into the new asphalt and base courses. LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS A LCCA was performed for the CTH B project using Version 2.4.1 (the most current version) of WisDOT’s WisPAVE Software. The worksheets are included in Exhibit 6. Based on the LCCA, The HMA Pavement alternatives have a lower present worth cost than the PCC alternatives. The following is a LCCA breakdown:

Station 32+50 – 295+00, Excluding Custer Road Intersection

Alternative No. 1 HMA Pavement

Alternative No. 2 PCC Pavement

Initial Construction Costs $2,034,292.84 $3,394,951.20 Total Facility Costs $3,083,099.28 $3,805,361.70 Percent Difference from Lowest Cost 0.0% 23.43%




Station 321+00 – 478+00 Alternative No. 1

HMA Pavement Alternative No. 2 PCC Pavement

Initial Construction Costs $712,542.96 $1,128,406.41 Total Facility Costs $1,001,142.27 $1,279,541.80 Percent Difference from Lowest Cost 0.0% 27.81%

Custer Road Intersection Alternative No. 1


Initial Construction Costs $134,281.71 $117,735.56 Total Facility Costs $165,109.46 $134,033.09 Percent Difference from Lowest Cost 23.19% 0.0%

CTH K Intersection Alternative No. 1


Initial Construction Costs $342,221.44 $318,276.67 Total Facility Costs $415,234.54 $354,994.80 Percent Difference from Lowest Cost 16.97% 0.0%

RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONSIDERATIONS Based on the LCCAs of the alternatives, the flexible alternative is the most economical for the 6.5 miles of pulverize and relay and is also preferred by the Portage County Highway Department. The rigid alternative was eliminated for the 1,600 feet of intersection reconstruction to be consistent with the pavement type for CTH B and to facilitate construction. Four different pavement sections are recommended, two for the pulverize and relay areas and two for the reconstruction areas. The recommendations for the project are as follows: For the pulverize and relay section from Station 32+50 to Station 295+00, excluding the reconstruction area at Custer Road: • 6-inches HMA Pavement Type E-10








For the pulverize and relay section from Station 321+00 to Station 478+00: • 5-inches HMA Pavement Type E-3




• Shoulders will be 4 foot HMA paved to match mainline thickness, and 2 foot gravel. We recommend the reconstruction area consist of completely removing the existing asphalt pavement and base and reconstructing a new pavement structure. The pavement sections are as follows: For the reconstruction at Custer Road, this includes CTH B from Station 170+00 to Station 181+00, and the acceleration lane: • 6-inches HMA Pavement Type E-10

• 2.5-inch upper layer,

o PG 58-28 (nominal aggregate size: 12.5 mm) o PG 70-28, HMA Pavement Type E-30, within intersection

• 3.5-inch lower layer, PG 58-28 (nominal aggregate size: 19.0 mm) • 15 inches Base Aggregate Dense 1¼ inch.


For the reconstruction at CTH K, this includes CTH B from Station 295+00 to Station 321+00: • 6-inches HMA Pavement Type E-10



• 6 inches granular sub-base





Side Roads Several side road intersections within the project limits will be reconstructed as part of this project. All intersecting side roads will be adjusted vertically to match the proposed profile of CTH B. The pavement structure for all side road intersections, with the exception of Custer Road and CTH K will match the mainline pavement structure. The pavement structure for Custer Road and CTH K will be as follows: • 4-inches HMA Pavement Type E-1



EXHIBIT 1

PROJECT LOCATION MAP

PR

OJE

CT

LO

CA

TIO

N

1-I

NC

H =

1-M

ILE

ST

OC

KT

ON

J J

B

K

D

B

Q

D5

4

1

1

6

36

36

31

31

Bear

Cr.

Th

om

asL

.

BearA

dam

s

L.

L.

Ell L.

L.

L.

Juli

a

Em

ily

L.

Lim

e

EE

KP

OR

TE

R5T

H

OA

K D

R

4T

H

CUSTER

KENNEDYAVE

TOWER

ADAMS

PL

EA

SA

NT

ST

AN

DIN

G

RO

CK

S

PA

VE

LS

KI

MIL

L

LAKE DR

OLD

18

LU

TZ

LIME

LIME

FO

UN

TA

IN

RIV

ER

DA

MR

AU

SHULFER

JAC

KIE

S

ALM

MILL RD

ST

ON

EY

RD

1S

T S

T

NE

WB

Y

WIC

ZE

K R

D

LN

ED

GE

WA

TE

R D

R

WA

RD

RD

FO

X R

D

KUBISIAK DR

KELLY RD

SHADY DR

CUSTER RD

BL

AC

K

O’KEEFE CT

2N

D S

T

TOWNLINE

OA

K R

IDG

EC

T E

&W

SMOKEY RD

LK

LK

T

HO

MA

S

BEAR LK RD

DR

RD

DR

BLUFF RD

ST

ST

RD

RD

RD

LK

RD

RD

LK

RD

RD

LK

RD

RD

RD

RD

RD

LK EMILY

DR

RDA

MH

ER

ST

Am

hers

tJc

t.

Arn

ott

161

Plo

ver

R.

PR

OJE

CT

LO

CA

TIO

N M

AP

FIG

UR

E 1

1

CT

H B

M

AR

20

10

ST

OC

KT

ON

- A

MH

ER

ST

DR

ND

AT

EP

RO

JE

CT

NO

.F

IGU

RE

NO

.F

ILE

NA

ME

:

6767-0

6-7

0

PO

RT

AG

E C

OU

NT

Y

WIS

CO

NS

IN

locati

on

map

.dg

n

Filename:

Plo

t F

ile D

ate

Create

d:

Layout-

Sheet

Nam

e:

Plo

tted B

y:

kochl

1:5

0:0

0 P

M3

/2

3/2

01

0

Default

L:\work\Projects\60145536\gra\locationmap.dgn

EXHIBIT 2

EXISTING AND PROPOSED PAVEMENT TYPICAL SECTIONS

EXHIBIT 3

TRAFFIC FORECAST

TRAF

FIC

FO

REC

AST

REP

OR

TR

EGIO

N/C

OU

NTY

(IES)

: N

orth

Cen

tral

/ Po

rtag

e

PRO

JEC

T ID

(S):

676

7-06

-00

/ 70

LO

CA

TIO

N:

Ken

nedy

Ave

nue

to U

SH 1

0 EB

R

OU

TE(S

): C

TH B

C

OM

PLET

ED:

2-10

-10

Traf

fic F

orec

astin

g S

ectio

n; B

urea

u of

Sta

te H

ighw

ay P

rogr

ams;

Div

isio

n of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n In

vest

men

t Man

agem

ent

Dev

elop

ed b

y: K

im T

ran

Pho

ne: (

608)

264

-726

5FA

X #:

(608

) 267

-185

6E-

Mai

l ID

: kim

.tran

@do

t.wi.g

ov

N

Stoc

kton

Amhe

rst

Plov

er

Plov

er

Plov

er

Amhe

rst J

unct

ion

Nelso

nville

Plov

er

Stev

ens P

oint

©̈HH ©̈B

©̈SS

©̈J

©̈K

©̈R

©̈KK5t

h St

6 th

St

4th

St

ine Rd

Rd

Bluff Rd

Porte

r Dr

Lake Rd

War

d R d

L utz

Ln

Smokey Rd

Burbank Rd

Pave

lski R

dOld

18 R

d

Tow e

Bl u ebird

D r

Lake Emily Rd

Lake Rd

US 10 Ramp

P ine D r

Lake

Tho

mas

Rd

Moor

e Rd

Blac

k Oak

Dr

O'Keefe Ct

Roos

evelt

Dr

Kelly Rd

Kjer Ward Dr

Wat

er W

ay

G ra y

Log

L n

R am p

§̈ ¦39

ST161

t u10

Des

ign

Valu

es (%

)R

oute

s

Des

ign

CTH

B

Volu

me(

s):

6550

----

K25

09.

6--

--K

100

10.3

----

Truc

k C

lass

%'s

K30

11.8

----

Cla

ssSe

g. 1

Seg.

2Se

g. 3

2D1.

9--

--T(

DH

V)

4.7

----

3AX

1.4

----

2S1+

2S2

0.9

----

D(D

sgn.

Hr.)

60/4

0--

--3-

S2

1.2

----

K8(

AD

T)D

BL

BTM

01

Dev

elop

ed b

y: K

im T

ran

Pho

ne: (

608)

264

-726

5FA

X #:

(608

) 267

-185

6E-

Mai

l ID

: kim

.tran

@do

t.wi.g

ov

3. T

ruck

cla

ssifi

catio

n pe

rcen

tage

s w

ere

take

n fro

m a

tabl

e re

pres

enta

tive

of s

imila

r fac

ilitie

s an

d lo

catio

ns th

roug

hout

the

stat

e of

Wis

cons

in.

N

NO

TES

ON

TH

E F

OR

EC

AS

T:

1. T

his

proj

ectio

n as

sum

es th

at n

o m

ajor

new

traf

fic

gene

rato

rs w

ill be

dev

elop

ed in

the

area

ser

ved

by th

e ro

adw

ay o

r int

erse

ctio

n ov

er th

e co

urse

of t

he p

lann

ing

perio

d.

2. C

TH B

is a

fact

or g

roup

IV ro

adw

ay in

dica

ting

low

to

mod

erat

e flu

ctua

tion

in tr

affic

thro

ugho

ut th

e ye

ar.

It is

co

nsid

ered

a ru

ral m

ajor

col

lect

or ro

adw

ay fo

r cou

nt

purp

oses

alo

ng th

is s

egm

ent o

f roa

dway

.

Last

Cou

nt/F

orec

ast Y

ears

:{0

00}

2002

CO

UN

T(0

00)

2012

AA

DT

-000

-20

22 A

AD

T00

0 2

032

AA

DT

Stoc

kton

Amhe

rst

Buen

a Vist

a

Plov

er

Plov

er

Lana

rk

Plov

er

Plov

er

Plov

er

Amhe

rst J

unct

ion

Nelso

nville

Plov

er

Stev

ens P

oint

©̈HH ©̈B

©̈SS

©̈Q

©̈D

©̈J

©̈K

©̈EE

©̈R

©̈KK

©̈K

5th

St

2nd

St

6 th

St

Shad

y Dr

4th

St

Elm

Dr

Town Line Rd

Old A

mish

Rd

Newb

y Rd

Rive

r Rd

Sta n

ding R

ocks

Rd

Custer Rd

Bluff Rd

Birc

h Dr

Porte

r Dr

1st S

t

Lake Rd

War

d R d

Mjelde Rd

Kennedy Ave

Ston

ey R

d

L utz

Ln

Oak DrSmokey Rd

Burbank Rd

Pave

lski R

d

R am p

Dam

rau

Rd

Old 18

Rd

Tow e r R d

Foun

t ai n

Grov

e Rd

B l u ebird

D r

Lake Emily Rd

Adams Lake Rd

US 10 Ramp

P ine D r

Lake

Tho

mas

Rd

Moor

e Rd

Blac

k Oak

Dr

O'Keefe Ct

Roos

evelt

Dr

Kelly Rd

Kjer Ward Dr

Wat

er W

ay

G ra y

Lo g

L n

R am p

Ramp

Old A

m ish

Rd

§̈ ¦39 §̈ ¦39

ST161

t u10

{450

0}(5

200)

-585

0-65

50

{300

0}(3

450)

-390

0-43

50

K8(

AD

T)--

----

DB

L-B

TM0.

1--

--T(

A8H

V)

----

--TO

TAL

5.5%

----

Dev

elop

ed b

y: K

im T

ran

Pho

ne: (

608)

264

-726

5FA

X #:

(608

) 267

-185

6E-

Mai

l ID

: kim

.tran

@do

t.wi.g

ov

3. T

ruck

cla

ssifi

catio

n pe

rcen

tage

s w

ere

take

n fro

m a

tabl

e re

pres

enta

tive

of s

imila

r fac

ilitie

s an

d lo

catio

ns th

roug

hout

the

stat

e of

Wis

cons

in.

N

NO

TES

ON

TH

E F

OR

EC

AS

T:

1. T

his

proj

ectio

n as

sum

es th

at n

o m

ajor

new

traf

fic

gene

rato

rs w

ill be

dev

elop

ed in

the

area

ser

ved

by th

e ro

adw

ay o

r int

erse

ctio

n ov

er th

e co

urse

of t

he p

lann

ing

perio

d.

2. C

TH B

is a

fact

or g

roup

IV ro

adw

ay in

dica

ting

low

to

mod

erat

e flu

ctua

tion

in tr

affic

thro

ugho

ut th

e ye

ar.

It is

co

nsid

ered

a ru

ral m

ajor

col

lect

or ro

adw

ay fo

r cou

nt

purp

oses

alo

ng th

is s

egm

ent o

f roa

dway

.

Last

Cou

nt/F

orec

ast Y

ears

:{0

00}

2002

CO

UN

T(0

00)

2012

AA

DT

-000

-20

22 A

AD

T00

0 2

032

AA

DT

Stoc

kton

Amhe

rst

Buen

a Vist

a

Plov

er

Plov

er

Lana

rk

Plov

er

Plov

er

Plov

er

Amhe

rst J

unct

ion

Nelso

nville

Plov

er

Stev

ens P

oint

©̈HH ©̈B

©̈SS

©̈Q

©̈D

©̈J

©̈K

©̈EE

©̈R

©̈KK

©̈K

5th

St

2nd

St

6 th

St

Shad

y Dr

4th

S t

Elm

Dr

Town Line Rd

Old A

mish

Rd

Newb

y Rd

Rive

r Rd

Sta n

ding R

ocks

Rd

Custer Rd

Bluff Rd

Birc

h Dr

Porte

r Dr

1st S

t

Lake Rd

War

d R d

Mjelde Rd

Kennedy Ave

Ston

ey R

d

L utz

Ln

Oak DrSmokey Rd

Burbank Rd

Pave

lski R

d

R am p

Dam

rau

Rd

Old 18

Rd

Tow e r R d

Foun

t ai n

Grov

e Rd

B l u ebird

D r

Lake Emily Rd

Adams Lake Rd

US 10 Ramp

P ine D r

Lake

Tho

mas

Rd

Moor

e Rd

Blac

k Oak

Dr

O'Keefe Ct

Roos

evelt

Dr

Kelly Rd

Kjer Ward Dr

Wat

er W

ay

G ra y

Lo g

L n

R am p

Ramp

Old A

m ish

Rd

§̈ ¦39 §̈ ¦39

ST161

t u10

{450

0}(5

200)

-585

0-65

50

{300

0}(3

450)

-390

0-43

50

Loc

atio

n:F

unct

. Cla

ss:

Cou

nty:

Sit

e N

ames

:

Wis

con

sin

Dep

artm

ent

of T

ran

spor

tati

on

4902

54, ,

NC

Por

tage

R M

ajor

Col

lect

orC

TH

B E

AS

T O

F C

TH

J S

TO

CK

TO

N T

NS

HP

344

Axl

e F

acto

r G

roup

:D

aily

Fac

tor

Gro

up:

Sea

sona

l F

acto

r G

roup

:

NA

Gro

wth

Fac

tor

Gro

up:

Dai

ly %

Cla

ss D

istr

ibu

tion

for

07/

12/2

011

Th

rou

gh 0

7/14

/201

1 (

48 h

ours

)

Roa

dw

ayN

eg D

IRP

os D

IR

MC

1.9

2.8

0.9

CA

R51

.2

52.3

50

.1

PU

23.6

22

.3

24.9

BU

S2.

2 3.

0 1.

3

2D5.

4 5.

9 4.

9

SU

36.

4 3.

2 9.

7

SU

4+

1.8

2.6

1.0

ST

4-

4.4

6.0

2.7

ST

53.

1 1.

7 4.

5

ST

6+

0.1

0.1

0.1

MT

5-

0.0

0.0

0.0

MT

60.

0 0.

0 0.

0

MT

7+

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tru

cks

23.3

22

.6

24.1

Com

bo

Tru

cks

7.6

7.8

7.3

Cla

ssif

ied

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0

Vol

um

e8,

767

4,46

8 4,

299

Axl

e F

acto

r0.

420

0.42

4 0.

416

Pag

e 1

of 1

7/25

/201

1 7

:12:

29A

MD

C02

:

Loc

atio

n:F

unct

. Cla

ss:

Cou

nty:

Sit

e N

ames

:

Wis

con

sin

Dep

artm

ent

of T

ran

spor

tati

on

4903

67, ,

NC

Por

tage

R M

ajor

Col

lect

orC

TH

B W

ES

T O

F C

TH

Q A

MH

ER

ST

TN

SH

P344

Axl

e F

acto

r G

roup

:D

aily

Fac

tor

Gro

up:

Sea

sona

l F

acto

r G

roup

:

NA

Gro

wth

Fac

tor

Gro

up:

Dai

ly %

Cla

ss D

istr

ibu

tion

for

07/

12/2

011

Th

rou

gh 0

7/14

/201

1 (

49 h

ours

)

Roa

dw

ayN

eg D

IRP

os D

IR

MC

0.9

1.1

0.7

CA

R54

.2

53.0

55

.3

PU

25.7

25

.5

26.0

BU

S1.

6 1.

6 1.

5

2D5.

8 6.

5 5.

1

SU

32.

9 3.

7 2.

1

SU

4+

0.7

0.0

1.4

ST

4-

3.3

4.1

2.5

ST

54.

8 4.

5 5.

2

ST

6+

0.1

0.2

0.0

MT

5-

0.0

0.0

0.0

MT

60.

0 0.

0 0.

0

MT

7+

0.0

0.0

0.0

Tru

cks

19.2

20

.5

17.9

Com

bo

Tru

cks

8.2

8.7

7.8

Cla

ssif

ied

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0

Vol

um

e6,

652

3,26

4 3,

388

Axl

e F

acto

r0.

425

0.42

5 0.

424

Pag

e 1

of 1

7/25

/201

1 7

:12:

32A

MD

C02

:

EXHIBIT 4

SOILS ANALYSIS

PR

OJE

CT

LOC

AT

ION

Soil

Soil

Start

End

Distance Alon

gDesign Group

Nam

eHorizon

Station

Station

Centerlin

eInde

xMeehan loam

y sand

B32

+50

34+00

150

0Richford loam

y sand

B34

+00

38+65

465

0Mosinee

sand

y loam

B38

+65

54+55

1,59

010

Point sandy

loam

B54

+55

60+30

575

12Mosinee

sand

y loam

B60

+30

73+40

1,31

010

Billett sa

ndy loam

B73

+40

89+80

1,64

012

Richford loam

y sand

B89

+80

93+30

350

0Billett sa

ndy loam

B93

+30

97+80

450

12Richford loam

y sand

B97

+80

99+60

180

0Billett sa

ndy loam

B99

+60

112+85

1,32

512

Richford loam

y sand

B11

2+85

114+00

115

0Billett sa

ndy loam

B13

6+50

150+60

1,41

012

Gravel Pit

B15

0+60

159+90

930

Billett sa

ndy loam

B15

9+90

163+55

365

12Richford loam

y sand

B16

3+55

171+00

745

0Richford loam

y sand

D17

1+00

172+35

135

0Re

constructio

n Section

Mecan

loam

y sand

D17

2+35

181+00

865

2Re

constructio

n Section

Rosholt sandy

loam

B18

1+00

190+65

965

14Mecan

loam

y sand

B19

0+65

205+55

1,49

014

Kranski loamy sand

B20

5+55

218+80

1,32

54

Wyocena

sand

y loam

B21

8+80

297+50

7,87

012

Wyocena

sand

y loam

B29

7+50

322+00

2,45

012

Reconstruct 2

97+50 ‐ 3

22+00

DGI 12

Wyocena

sand

y loam

B32

2+00

383+85

6,18

512

Change in

Traffic

Rosholt loam

B38

3+85

387+55

370

14Billett sa

ndy loam

B38

7+55

394+00

645

12Ro

sholt sandy

loam

B46

0+50

466+00

550

14Wyocena

sand

y loam

B46

6+00

472+45

645

12Ro

sholt loam

B47

2+45

478+00

555

14

DGI 12

AADT

(201

2) 520

0

AADT

(203

2) 655

0

DGI 2

AAD

T (201

2) 520

0

AADT

( 20

32) 6

550

DGI 14

AADT

(201

2) 520

0

AADT

(203

2) 655

0

DGI 14

AADT

(201

2) 345

0

AADT

(203

2) 435

0

Project ID 67

67‐06‐00

Stockton

‐ Am

herst

Kenn

edy Av

e to USH

10 EB

CTH B, Portage Cou

nty

Octob

er, 201

1

EXHIBIT 5

PAVEMENT DESIGN COMPUTATIONS

HMA Alternative #

LAYER MATERIAL TYPELAYER

COEFFICIENT

LAYERTHICKNESS

SN(in)

SURFACE

BASE

SUBBASE 1

SUBBASE 2

E-10

Pulverized AsphalticConcrete

Granular Subbase Course

None

0.44

0.18

0.06

0

6

12

4

0

2.64

2.16

0.24

0

5.04

1

HMA THICKNESS DESIGN

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011

L:\work\Projects\60145536\400_Technical\406_Civil\406.2_Roadways\Pavement\CTH B

6767-06-00

CTH B

Kennedy Avenue - USH 10

Portage County

LOADING

Truck Type % of ADT DLT # of TrucksESAL Load

Factor ESAL's

2D

3-SU

2S-1, 2S-2

3S-2

DBL BTM

7.6

6.4

6.2

3.2

0.0

2,938

2,938

2,938

2,938

2,938

223

188

182

94

0.3

0.8

0.5

0.9

2.0

67

150

91

85

393

2,868,900

Design Lane Daily ESAL's

Design Lane Total Life ESAL's

SOILSDGI

Frost Index

Soil Support Value (SSV)

14

F-3

3.9

DESIGN CALCULATION Required SN 4.87

PCC THICKNESS DESIGN

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

LOADING


Factor ESAL's

2D

3-SU

2S-1, 2S-2

3S-2

DBL BTM

7.6

6.4

6.2

3.2

0.0

2,938

2,938

2,938

2,938

2,938

223

188

182

94

0.3

1.2

0.6

1.6

2.1

67

226

109

150

552

4,029,600



SOILS

DESIGN THICKNESS

Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k) 125

Calculated Slab Thickness

PCC ALT.#1 Plan Slab Thickness


8.7

9

9

(in)

(in)

(in)

HMA Alternative #


COEFFICIENT

LAYERTHICKNESS

SN(in)

SURFACE

BASE

SUBBASE 1

SUBBASE 2

E-3

Pulverized AsphalticConcrete


None

0.44

0.18

0.06

0

5

12

4

0

2.2

2.16

0.24

0

4.6

1


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

LOADING


Factor ESAL's

2D

3-SU

2S-1, 2S-2

3S-2

DBL BTM

7.4

2.9

4.0

4.9

0.0

1,950

1,950

1,950

1,950

1,950

144

57

78

96

0.3

0.8

0.5

0.9

2.0

43

46

39

86

214

1,562,200



SOILSDGI

Frost Index


14

F-3

3.9



Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

LOADING


Factor ESAL's

2D

3-SU

2S-1, 2S-2

3S-2

DBL BTM

7.4

2.9

4.0

4.9

0.0

1,950

1,950

1,950

1,950

1,950

144

57

78

96

0.3

1.2

0.6

1.6

2.1

43

68

47

154

312

2,277,600



SOILS

DESIGN THICKNESS





8.

8

8

(in)

(in)

(in)

HMA Alternative #


COEFFICIENT

LAYERTHICKNESS

SN(in)

SURFACE

BASE

SUBBASE 1

SUBBASE 2

E-10

CABC (crushed gravel)

None

None

0.44

0.1

0

0

6

15

0

0

2.64

1.5

0

0

4.14

1


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011

L:\work\Projects\60145536\400_Technical\406_Civil\406.2_Roadways\Pavement\CTH B &

6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

LOADING


Factor ESAL's

2D

3-SU

2S-1, 2S-2

3S-2

DBL BTM

7.6

6.4

6.2

3.2

0.0

3,525

3,525

3,525

3,525

3,525

268

226

219

113

0.3

0.8

0.5

0.9

2.0

80

181

110

102

473

3,452,900



SOILSDGI

Frost Index


2

F-2

5.4



Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

LOADING


Factor ESAL's

2D

3-SU

2S-1, 2S-2

3S-2

DBL BTM

7.6

6.4

6.2

3.2

0.0

3,525

3,525

3,525

3,525

3,525

268

226

219

113

0.3

1.2

0.6

1.6

2.1

80

271

131

181

663

4,839,900



SOILS

DESIGN THICKNESS





8.5

8.5

8.5

(in)

(in)

(in)

HMA Alternative #


COEFFICIENT

LAYERTHICKNESS

SN(in)

SURFACE

BASE

SUBBASE 1

SUBBASE 2

E-10



None

0.44

0.1

0.06

0

6

18

6

0

2.64

1.8

0.36

0

4.8

1


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011

L:\work\Projects\60145536\400_Technical\406_Civil\406.2_Roadways\Pavement\CTH B & CTH

6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

LOADING


Factor ESAL's

2D

3-SU

2S-1, 2S-2

3S-2

DBL BTM

7.6

6.4

6.2

3.2

0.0

3,525

3,525

3,525

3,525

3,525

268

226

219

113

0.3

0.8

0.5

0.9

2.0

80

181

110

102

473

3,452,900



SOILSDGI

Frost Index


12

F-3

4.2



Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

LOADING


Factor ESAL's

2D

3-SU

2S-1, 2S-2

3S-2

DBL BTM

7.6

6.4

6.2

3.2

0.0

3,525

3,525

3,525

3,525

3,525

268

226

219

113

0.3

1.2

0.6

1.6

2.1

80

271

131

181

663

4,839,900



SOILS

DESIGN THICKNESS





8.9

9

9

(in)

(in)

(in)

EXHIBIT 6

LCCA WORKSHEETS

BID ITEM BID ITEM # UNITS UNITS COST

Asphalt Material for Tack Coat 40204 GAL $5.00

Asphaltic Material for Plant Mixes 40501 TONS $450.00

Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, Type HV (40712) TONS $0.00

Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, Type MV (40713) TONS $0.00

Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, Type LV (40714) TONS $0.00

ACITEMS

Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, E-0.3 40721 TONS $0.00

Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, E-1 40722 TONS $45.00




Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, E-30X 40726 TONS $0.00

Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, SMA 40727 TONS $0.00

PCCITEMS

Concrete Pavement, 6 inch 41506 SY $0.00

Concrete Pavement, 6.5 inch 41526 SY $0.00












BID ITEM COSTS

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

BID ITEM COSTS

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

BASECOURSE

ITEMS

Crushed Aggregate Base Course 30404 TONS $10.00

Open Graded Base Course 30420 TONS $0.00

Asphalt Stabilized Open Graded BaseCourse

99999 TONS $0.00

Cement Stabilized Open Graded BaseCourse

99999 SY $0.00

Asphaltic Base Course 30601 TONS $0.00

Concrete Base Course 99999 SY $0.00

Breaker Run 30426 TONS $0.00

Granular Subbase Course 21201 CY $0.00

Shoulder Gravel 99999 TONS $13.00


MISCITEMS

Concrete Curb and Gutter, Type A 60123 L.F. $0.00

Concrete Curb and Gutter, Type D 60133 L.F. $0.00

Geotextile Fabric, Type DF 64503 SY $0.00

Pipe Underdrain 61201 L.F. $0.00

Pipe Underdrain, Unperforated 61211 L.F. $0.00

R.C. Apron Endwalls for Underdrain 61254 EACH $0.00

REHABITEMS

Salvaged Asphaltic Pavement, Milling 41020 TONS $9.00

Mill and Relay Asphaltic ConcretePavement

90358 SY $1.30

Base Patching, Asphaltic 30810 SY $30.00

Base Patching, Concrete 30820 SY $40.00

Concrete Pavement Repair 41660 CY $250.00

Pavement Ties 41653 EACH $6.00

Dowel Bars 41654 EACH $10.00

Continuous Diamond Grinding 41670 SY $3.00

Retro-fit Dowel Bars 99999 EACH $30.00

Sawing Existing Pavement 66501 L.F. $2.00

Sawing Concrete Pavement, Full Depth 66502 L.F. $3.00

BID ITEM COSTS

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

RECONITEMS

Pulverizing Asphaltic Concrete Pavement 90357 SY $1.00

Rubblizing Concrete Pavement 90405 SY $2.00

Cracking and Seating Concrete Pavement 40901 SY $0.00

Breaking and Seating Concrete Pavement 99999 SY $0.00

Removing Pavement 20401 SY $2.70


HMA Alternate 1 CTH B - 6" HMA on 12" pulverize and relay

RDWY Width

Using English Units

Structure Width

Lt.Shld. Width

Lt. Lane Width

Rt. Lane Width

Rt. Shld. Width

Side Slope

36

24

4

12

12

4

4:1

ROADWAY

SHOULDERS

E-10

E-10

6

6

5.5

5.5

110

110

1

1

0.025

0.025

Mix Type

Pav'tThickness

% AC

UnitWeight

# of TackCoat

Layers

Tack CoatCoverage

Rate

BASE

SUBBASE 1

SUBBASE 2

Material TypeThickness

UnitWeight % of Length

with drainage

Pulverized Asphaltic Concrete


None

12

4

0

0

0

0

EXISTINGPAVEMENT

Existing PavementConstruction Process

% of ProjectLength

ExistingPavementThickness

ExistingPavement

Width

AC Pulverization 100 0 30

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

(in) (lbs/SY/in) (Gal/SY)

(in) (TONS/CY)

(in) (ft)

HMA ALTERNATE DESCRIPTION

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

ITEM UNITS QUANTITY COST

(RDWY) E-10 TONS 22,302.7 $1,226,649.64

(SHLD)

(AC OIL)

Tack Coat

Shoulder Gravel

(Base)

(Subbase 1)

(Subbase 2)

E-10

E-10



None

Pulverizing Asphaltic ConcretePavement

(Other)

TONS 7,434.2 $408,883.21

TONS 1,635.5 $735,989.78

GAL 2,252.8 $11,264.00

TONS 5,632.0 $73,216.00

0.0 $0.00

CY 0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

SY 84,480.0 $84,480.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

$2,540,482.63TOTAL INITIAL COST

HMA Alternate 1

HMA ALTERNATE QUANTITIES & COSTS

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

HMA ALTERNATE

YEAR TYPE OF WORK ACTIVITY SERVICE LIFE COSTInitial Construction0 18 $2,540,482.63

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

AC Rehabilitaion

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

AC Rehabilitaion

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

AC Rehabilitaion

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

3

8

18 Mill & HMA Overlay 12

$9,600.00

$12,000.00

$1,110,912.04

21

26

$9,600.00

$12,000.00

12 $1,110,912.04Mill & HMA Overlay30

33

38

42

45

50

Mill & HMA Overlay 12

$9,600.00

$12,000.00

$1,110,912.04

54

1

$9,600.00

$12,000.00

HMA ALTERNATE REHABILITATIONSUMMARY

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B

Kennedy Avenue - USH 10 Portage County


AC Pavement TONS 12,390.4 $681,472.02

Asphalt Cement TONS 681.5 $306,662.42

Tack Coat GAL 2,252.8 $11,264.00

Shoulder Gravel TONS 0.0 $0.00

Salvaged Asphaltic Pavement,Milling

TONS 12,390.4 $111,513.60

Overlay Thickness(in)

Asphalt MixType % AC

Tack CoatCoverage Rate

(Gal/SY)# of Tack Coat

Layers

HMA Alternate 1 Rehabilitation 1

2.50 E-10 5.5 1 0.025

$1,110,912.04

Overlay Limits Milling Limits

Milling Depth (in)

RDWY & SHLD's

2.50

RDWY & SHLD's

Other units 0.0 $0.00

MILL and ASPHALT OVERLAYREHABILITATION

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


AC Pavement TONS 12,390.4 $681,472.02


Tack Coat GAL 2,252.8 $11,264.00



TONS 12,390.4 $111,513.60





Layers


2.50 E-10 5.5 1 0.025

$1,110,912.04


Milling Depth (in)

RDWY & SHLD's

2.50

RDWY & SHLD's


PCC Alternate 1 CTH B - 9" PCC on puverize and relay

RDWY Width

Using English Units

Structure Width

Lt.Shld. Width

Lt. Lane Width

Rt. Lane Width

Rt. Shld. Width

Side Slope

36

24

4

12

12

4

4:1

ROADWAY

SHOULDERS PCC Shoulders

9

9

Mix Type

Pav'tThickness

BASE

SUBBASE 1

SUBBASE 2



with drainage

CABC

None

None

6

0

0

0

0

0

EXISTINGPAVEMENT


% of ProjectLength


ExistingPavement

Width

Pavement Removal 100 0 30

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

(in)

(in) (TONS/CY)

(in) (ft)

PCC ALTERNATE DESCRIPTION

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


(RDWY)

(SHLD)

Tack Coat

Shoulder Gravel

(Base)

(Subbase 1)

(Subbase 2)

(Other)

TOTAL INITIAL COST

PCC Alternate 1

$3,742,933.36

Concrete Pavement, 9 inch


CABC

None

None

Removing Pavement

Asphalt Cement

SY 67,584.0 $2,230,272.00

SY 22,528.0 $743,424.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

TONS 9,856.0 $128,128.00

TONS 41,301.3 $413,013.36

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

SY 84,480.0 $228,096.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

PCC ALTERNATE QUANTITIES & COSTS

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

PCC ALTERNATE


PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

PCC Rehabilitaion

PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

PCC Rehabilitaion

PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

PCC Rehabilitaion

PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

10

15

25 Repair & Grind 8

$19,200.00

$38,400.00

$342,351.33

28

31

$19,200.00

$38,400.00

15 $1,366,324.58Repair & Overlay33

36

41

48

52

57

Mill, Repair & Overlay 15

$9,600.00

$12,000.00

$1,453,263.37

63

1

$9,600.00

$12,000.00

PCC ALTERNATE REHABILITATION SUMMARY

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


Concrete Pavement Repair CY 901.3 $225,333.33

Pavement Ties EACH 575.0 $3,450.00

Dowel Bars EACH 8,112.0 $81,120.00

Sawing Concrete Pavement,Full Depth

L.F. 10,816.0 $32,448.00

Continuous Diamond Grinding SY 0.0 $0.00

PCC Alternate 1 Rehabilitation 1

$342,351.33


# of STD PCCPatches

10.0 Percent Joint Repair

PCC Patch Width 32.00 (ft)

PCC Slab Thickness (in)

Grind Limits None

169

9.00

REPAIR and GRIND REHABILITATION

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

REPAIR and OVERLAY REHABILITATION

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


AC Pavement TONS 12,390.4 $681,472.02


Tack Coat GAL 2,252.8 $11,264.00




$1,366,324.58

Overlay Limits

Dowel Bars EACH 8,112.0 $81,120.00





Layers

E-10 1 0.025

# of STD PCCPatches





L.F. 10,816.0 $32,448.00

Shoulder Gravel

Other

TONS

units

1,890.4

0.0

$24,574.81

$0.00

RDWY & SHLD's

169

9.00

5.52.50


AC Pavement TONS 12,390.4 $681,472.02


Tack Coat GAL 2,252.8 $11,264.00




$1,453,263.37


Milling Depth (in)

RDWY & SHLD's

2.50

Dowel Bars EACH 8,112.0 $81,120.00





Layers

2.50 E-10 5.5 1 0.025

# of STD PCCPatches 169



PCC Slab Thickness 9.00 (in)


TONS 12,390.4 $111,513.60


Shoulder Gravel

Other

L.F.

TONS

units

10,816.0

0.0

0.0

$32,448.00

$0.00

$0.00

RDWY & SHLD's

MILL, REPAIR and ASPHALT OVERLAYREHABILITATION (PCC)

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

PRESENT WORTH COSTS

(CURRRENT YEAR)

Initial Construction Costs

Maintenance Costs

Rehabilitation Costs

Rehabilitation Salvage Value

Total Facility Costs

ALT 1 ALT 2 ALT 3 ALT 4 ALT 5 ALT 6

CTH B - 6"HMA on 12"pulverize and

relay

CTH B - 9"PCC on

puverize andrelay

PCC Alternate2

Field9 Field10 Field11

$2,304,292.84

$26,438.64

$781,657.56

($29,289.77)

$3,083,099.28

$3,394,951.20

$43,901.81

$466,130.38

($99,621.69)

$3,805,361.70

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

+ 0.00% + 23.43%

Current Year 2010

Construction Year 2012

Analysis Period 50 yr

Project Length

Analysis Basis

Discount Rate (%)

4.8

Project

5

LCCA RESULTS

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

HMA Alternate 1 K to 10 - 5" HMA on pulverize and relay

RDWY Width

Using English Units

Structure Width

Lt.Shld. Width

Lt. Lane Width

Rt. Lane Width

Rt. Shld. Width

Side Slope

36

24

4

12

12

4

4:1

ROADWAY

SHOULDERS

E-3

E-3

5

5

5.5

5.5

110

110

1

1

0.025

0.025

Mix Type

Pav'tThickness

% AC

UnitWeight

# of TackCoat

Layers

Tack CoatCoverage

Rate

BASE

SUBBASE 1

SUBBASE 2



with drainage



None

12

4

0

0

0

0

EXISTINGPAVEMENT


% of ProjectLength


ExistingPavement

Width

AC Pulverization 100 0 30

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft


(in) (TONS/CY)

(in) (ft)


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


(RDWY) E-3 TONS 7,279.4 $363,967.99

(SHLD)

(AC OIL)

Tack Coat

Shoulder Gravel

(Base)

(Subbase 1)

(Subbase 2)

E-3

E-3



None

Pulverizing Asphaltic ConcretePavement

(Other)

TONS 2,426.5 $121,322.67

TONS 533.8 $240,218.87

GAL 882.3 $4,411.73

TONS 1,736.1 $22,569.28

0.0 $0.00

CY 0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

SY 33,088.0 $33,088.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

$785,578.54TOTAL INITIAL COST

HMA Alternate 1


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

HMA ALTERNATE

YEAR TYPE OF WORK ACTIVITY SERVICE LIFE COSTInitial Construction0 18 $785,578.54

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

AC Rehabilitaion

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

AC Rehabilitaion

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

AC Rehabilitaion

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

3

8


$3,760.00

$4,700.00

$410,842.68

21

26

$3,760.00

$4,700.00

12 $410,842.68Mill & HMA Overlay30

33

38

42

45

50


$3,760.00

$4,700.00

$410,842.68

54

1

$3,760.00

$4,700.00


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B



AC Pavement TONS 4,852.9 $242,645.34


Tack Coat GAL 882.3 $4,411.73



TONS 4,852.9 $43,676.16





Layers


2.50 E-3 5.5 1 0.025

$410,842.68


Milling Depth (in)

RDWY & SHLD's

2.50

RDWY & SHLD's



Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


AC Pavement TONS 4,852.9 $242,645.34


Tack Coat GAL 882.3 $4,411.73



TONS 4,852.9 $43,676.16





Layers


2.50 E-3 5.5 1 0.025

$410,842.68


Milling Depth (in)

RDWY & SHLD's

2.50

RDWY & SHLD's


PCC Alternate 1 K to 10 - 8" PCC on pulverize and relay

RDWY Width

Using English Units

Structure Width

Lt.Shld. Width

Lt. Lane Width

Rt. Lane Width

Rt. Shld. Width

Side Slope

36

24

4

12

12

4

4:1

ROADWAY


8

8

Mix Type

Pav'tThickness

BASE

SUBBASE 1

SUBBASE 2



with drainage

CABC

None

None

6

0

0

0

0

0

EXISTINGPAVEMENT


% of ProjectLength


ExistingPavement

Width


ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

(in)

(in) (TONS/CY)

(in) (ft)


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


(RDWY)

(SHLD)

Tack Coat

Shoulder Gravel

(Base)

(Subbase 1)

(Subbase 2)

(Other)

TOTAL INITIAL COST

PCC Alternate 1

$1,244,067.95



CABC

None

None

Removing Pavement

Asphalt Cement

SY 26,470.4 $714,700.81

SY 8,823.5 $238,233.60

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

TONS 3,268.0 $42,483.36

TONS 15,931.3 $159,312.58

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

SY 33,088.0 $89,337.60

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

PCC ALTERNATE


PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

PCC Rehabilitaion

PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

PCC Rehabilitaion

PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

PCC Rehabilitaion

PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

10

15

25 Repair & Grind 8

$7,520.00

$15,040.00

$123,918.22

28

31

$7,520.00

$15,040.00

15 $500,709.88Repair & Overlay33

36

41

48

52

57


$3,760.00

$4,700.00

$534,760.90

63

1

$3,760.00

$4,700.00


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County




Dowel Bars EACH 3,168.0 $31,680.00


L.F. 4,224.0 $12,672.00



$123,918.22


# of STD PCCPatches




Grind Limits None

66

8.00


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


AC Pavement TONS 4,852.9 $242,645.34


Tack Coat GAL 882.3 $4,411.73




$500,709.88

Overlay Limits

Dowel Bars EACH 3,168.0 $31,680.00





Layers

E-3 1 0.025

# of STD PCCPatches





L.F. 4,224.0 $12,672.00

Shoulder Gravel

Other

TONS

units

740.4

0.0

$9,625.14

$0.00

RDWY & SHLD's

66

8.00

5.52.50


AC Pavement TONS 4,852.9 $242,645.34


Tack Coat GAL 882.3 $4,411.73




$534,760.90


Milling Depth (in)

RDWY & SHLD's

2.50

Dowel Bars EACH 3,168.0 $31,680.00





Layers

2.50 E-3 5.5 1 0.025






TONS 4,852.9 $43,676.16


Shoulder Gravel

Other

L.F.

TONS

units

4,224.0

0.0

0.0

$12,672.00

$0.00

$0.00

RDWY & SHLD's


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

PRESENT WORTH COSTS

(CURRRENT YEAR)


Maintenance Costs





K to 10 - 5"HMA on

pulverize andrelay

K to 10 - 8"PCC on

pulverize andrelay

PCC Alternate2


$712,542.96

$10,355.14

$289,076.25

($10,832.08)

$1,001,142.27

$1,128,406.41

$17,194.88

$170,598.56

($36,658.04)

$1,279,541.80

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

+ 0.00% + 27.81%

Current Year 2010



Project Length

Analysis Basis

Discount Rate (%)

1.88

Project

5

LCCA RESULTS

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

HMA Alternate 1 CTH B & Custer - 6" HMA on 15" CABC

RDWY Width

Using English Units

Structure Width

Lt.Shld. Width

Lt. Lane Width

Rt. Lane Width

Rt. Shld. Width

Side Slope

36

24

4

12

12

4

4:1

ROADWAY

SHOULDERS

E-10

E-10

6

6

5.5

5.5

110

110

1

1

0.025

0.025

Mix Type

Pav'tThickness

% AC

UnitWeight

# of TackCoat

Layers

Tack CoatCoverage

Rate

BASE

SUBBASE 1

SUBBASE 2



with drainage


None

None

15

0

0

2

0

0

EXISTINGPAVEMENT


% of ProjectLength


ExistingPavement

Width


ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft


(in) (TONS/CY)

(in) (ft)


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


(RDWY) E-10 TONS 882.8 $48,554.88

(SHLD)

(AC OIL)

Tack Coat

Shoulder Gravel

(Base)

(Subbase 1)

(Subbase 2)

E-10

E-10


None

None

Removing Pavement

(Other)

TONS 294.3 $16,184.96

TONS 64.7 $29,132.93

GAL 89.2 $445.87

TONS 222.9 $2,898.13

TONS 4,180.0 $41,800.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

SY 3,344.0 $9,028.80

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00


HMA Alternate 1


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

HMA ALTERNATE


AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

AC Rehabilitaion

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

AC Rehabilitaion

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

AC Rehabilitaion

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

3

8


$380.00

$475.00

$43,973.60

21

26

$380.00

$475.00


33

38

42

45

50


$380.00

$475.00

$43,973.60

54

1

$380.00

$475.00


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B



AC Pavement TONS 490.5 $26,974.93


Tack Coat GAL 89.2 $445.87



TONS 490.5 $4,414.08





Layers


2.50 E-10 5.5 1 0.025

$43,973.60


Milling Depth (in)

RDWY & SHLD's

2.50

RDWY & SHLD's



Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County







TONS 490.5 $4,414.08





Layers


2.50 E-10 5.5 1 0.025

$43,973.60


Milling Depth (in)

RDWY & SHLD's

2.50

RDWY & SHLD's


PCC Alternate 1 CTH B & Custer - 8.5" PCC

RDWY Width

Using English Units

Structure Width

Lt.Shld. Width

Lt. Lane Width

Rt. Lane Width

Rt. Shld. Width

Side Slope

36

24

4

12

12

4

4:1

ROADWAY


8.5

8.5

Mix Type

Pav'tThickness

BASE

SUBBASE 1

SUBBASE 2



with drainage

CABC

None

None

6

0

0

0

0

0

EXISTINGPAVEMENT


% of ProjectLength


ExistingPavement

Width


ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

(in)

(in) (TONS/CY)

(in) (ft)


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


(RDWY)

(SHLD)

Tack Coat

Shoulder Gravel

(Base)

(Subbase 1)

(Subbase 2)

(Other)

TOTAL INITIAL COST

PCC Alternate 1

$129,803.44

Concrete Pavement, 8.5 inch

Concrete Pavement, 8.5 inch

CABC

None

None

Removing Pavement

Asphalt Cement

SY 2,675.2 $74,905.60

SY 891.7 $24,968.53

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

TONS 359.7 $4,675.92

TONS 1,622.5 $16,224.59

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

SY 3,344.0 $9,028.80

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

PCC ALTERNATE


PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

PCC Rehabilitaion

PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

PCC Rehabilitaion

PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

PCC Rehabilitaion

PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

10

15

25 Repair & Grind 8

$760.00

$1,520.00

$13,662.81

28

31

$760.00

$1,520.00


36

41

48

52

57


$380.00

$475.00

$57,636.41

63

1

$380.00

$475.00


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County



Pavement Ties EACH 24.0 $144.00

Dowel Bars EACH 336.0 $3,360.00


L.F. 448.0 $1,344.00



$13,662.81


# of STD PCCPatches




Grind Limits None

7

8.50


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County








$54,195.08

Overlay Limits






Layers

E-10 1 0.025

# of STD PCCPatches





L.F. 448.0 $1,344.00

Shoulder Gravel

Other

TONS

units

74.8

0.0

$972.75

$0.00

RDWY & SHLD's

7

8.50

5.52.50








$57,636.41


Milling Depth (in)

RDWY & SHLD's

2.50






Layers

2.50 E-10 5.5 1 0.025






TONS 490.5 $4,414.08


Shoulder Gravel

Other

L.F.

TONS

units

448.0

0.0

0.0

$1,344.00

$0.00

$0.00

RDWY & SHLD's


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

PRESENT WORTH COSTS

(CURRRENT YEAR)


Maintenance Costs





CTH B &Custer - 6"

HMA on 15"CABC

CTH B &Custer - 8.5"

PCC

PCC Alternate2


$134,281.71

$1,046.53

$30,940.61

($1,159.39)

$165,109.46

$117,735.56

$1,737.78

$18,510.74

($3,951.00)

$134,033.09

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

+ 23.19% + 0.00%

Current Year 2010



Project Length

Analysis Basis

Discount Rate (%)

0.19

Project

5

LCCA RESULTS

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

HMA Alternate 1 CTH B & CTH K - 6" HMA on 18" CABC on

RDWY Width

Using English Units

Structure Width

Lt.Shld. Width

Lt. Lane Width

Rt. Lane Width

Rt. Shld. Width

Side Slope

36

24

4

12

12

4

4:1

ROADWAY

SHOULDERS

E-10

E-10

6

6.5

5.5

5.5

110

110

1

1

0.025

0.025

Mix Type

Pav'tThickness

% AC

UnitWeight

# of TackCoat

Layers

Tack CoatCoverage

Rate

BASE

SUBBASE 1

SUBBASE 2



with drainage



None

18

6

0

2

0

0

EXISTINGPAVEMENT


% of ProjectLength


ExistingPavement

Width


ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft


(in) (TONS/CY)

(in) (ft)


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


(RDWY) E-10 TONS 2,090.9 $114,998.39

(SHLD)

(AC OIL)

Tack Coat

Shoulder Gravel

(Base)

(Subbase 1)

(Subbase 2)

E-10

E-10



None

Removing Pavement

(Other)

TONS 755.0 $41,527.20

TONS 156.5 $70,436.52

GAL 211.2 $1,056.00

TONS 587.9 $7,642.56

TONS 12,025.4 $120,254.43

CY 2,376.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

SY 7,920.0 $21,384.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00


HMA Alternate 1


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

HMA ALTERNATE


AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

AC Rehabilitaion

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

AC Rehabilitaion

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

AC Rehabilitaion

AC Maintenance

AC Maintenance

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

3

8


$900.00

$1,125.00

$104,148.00

21

26

$900.00

$1,125.00


33

38

42

45

50


$900.00

$1,125.00

$104,148.00

54

1

$900.00

$1,125.00


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B



AC Pavement TONS 1,161.6 $63,888.00


Tack Coat GAL 211.2 $1,056.00



TONS 1,161.6 $10,454.40





Layers


2.50 E-10 5.5 1 0.025

$104,148.00


Milling Depth (in)

RDWY & SHLD's

2.50

RDWY & SHLD's



Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County




Tack Coat GAL 211.2 $1,056.00



TONS 1,161.6 $10,454.40





Layers


2.50 E-10 5.5 1 0.025

$104,148.00


Milling Depth (in)

RDWY & SHLD's

2.50

RDWY & SHLD's


PCC Alternate 1 CTH B & CTH K - 9" PCC

RDWY Width

Using English Units

Structure Width

Lt.Shld. Width

Lt. Lane Width

Rt. Lane Width

Rt. Shld. Width

Side Slope

36

24

4

12

12

4

4:1

ROADWAY


9

9

Mix Type

Pav'tThickness

BASE

SUBBASE 1

SUBBASE 2



with drainage

CABC

None

None

6

0

0

0

0

0

EXISTINGPAVEMENT


% of ProjectLength


ExistingPavement

Width


ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

(in)

(in) (TONS/CY)

(in) (ft)


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


(RDWY)

(SHLD)

Tack Coat

Shoulder Gravel

(Base)

(Subbase 1)

(Subbase 2)

(Other)

TOTAL INITIAL COST

PCC Alternate 1

$350,900.00



CABC

None

None

Removing Pavement

Asphalt Cement

SY 6,336.0 $209,088.00

SY 2,112.0 $69,696.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

TONS 924.0 $12,012.00

TONS 3,872.0 $38,720.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

SY 7,920.0 $21,384.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00

0.0 $0.00


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

PCC ALTERNATE


PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

PCC Rehabilitaion

PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

PCC Rehabilitaion

PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

PCC Rehabilitaion

PCC Maintenance

PCC Maintenance

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

1st Cycle

2nd Cycle

10

15

25 Repair & Grind 8

$1,800.00

$3,600.00

$28,324.00

28

31

$1,800.00

$3,600.00


36

41

48

51

56


$900.00

$1,125.00

$132,472.00

63

1

$900.00

$1,125.00


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County






L.F. 960.0 $2,880.00



$28,324.00


# of STD PCCPatches




Grind Limits None

16

9.00


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County




Tack Coat GAL 211.2 $1,056.00




$124,321.49

Overlay Limits






Layers

E-10 1 0.025

# of STD PCCPatches





L.F. 960.0 $2,880.00

Shoulder Gravel

Other

TONS

units

177.2

0.0

$2,303.89

$0.00

RDWY & SHLD's

16

9.00

5.52.50




Tack Coat GAL 211.2 $1,056.00




$132,472.00


Milling Depth (in)

RDWY & SHLD's

2.50






Layers

2.50 E-10 5.5 1 0.025






TONS 1,161.6 $10,454.40


Shoulder Gravel

Other

L.F.

TONS

units

960.0

0.0

0.0

$2,880.00

$0.00

$0.00

RDWY & SHLD's


Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

PRESENT WORTH COSTS

(CURRRENT YEAR)


Maintenance Costs





CTH B & CTHK - 6" HMA on18" CABC oncrushed agg

CTH B & CTHK - 9" PCC

PCC Alternate2


$342,221.44

$2,478.62

$73,280.39

($2,745.92)

$415,234.54

$318,276.67

$4,122.19

$41,676.94

($9,081.00)

$354,994.80

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

+ 16.97% + 0.00%

Current Year 2010



Project Length

Analysis Basis

Discount Rate (%)

0.45

Project

5

LCCA RESULTS

Project ID:

Highway Name:

County Name:

Designer Name:

Project Termini:

10/28/2011


6767-06-00

CTH B


Portage County

table of contents - cedar corp. · • 2.5-inch upper layer, pg 58-28 (nominal aggregate size: 12.5...

Documents