table of coutents - harold weisbergjfk.hood.edu/collection/weisberg subject index files/f...

33
Table of Coutents PAGE Review of the Forensic Science Examinations Embodied in the Warren Commission Report ' Introductory Remarks 259 Charles A. McInerney, A,B The Warren Commission : Report and Hearings 261 . James A. Osterberg, MPA Assassin Forger 272 Alwyn Cole Psychiatric Observations on the Warren Commission Report ' 289 Maier Tuchler, M.D. A Critique of the Medical Aspects of the Investigation into the Assassination of President Kennedy 300 Cyril Wecht, M.D., LL.B. A Legal Demurrer to the Report of the Warren Com- mission 318 Jay Schwartz, B.S., J.D. Historical Research, Document Examination and Crown Prince Rudolph of Austria 330 David A. Crown, M.Crim General Criminalistics in the Courtroom 358 Lowell W. Bradford, B.Sc Further Observations on Murdering Mothers 373 Werner Tuteur, M.D. and Jacob Matzen M.A Volume 11, Number 3, July 15GG. JOURNAL OP FORENSIC SCIENCES is puldislied In January, April, July and October by Callaghan & Company at 185 North Archer Avenue, Mundelein, Illinois 00080. Subscription price 325.00 a year, Entered as second-class matter January 17, 1358 at the post office In Mundelein. Illinois, under the Act of March 3, 1873. Copyright 19811 by Callaghan & Company. All rights reserved. 111

Upload: dinhthien

Post on 23-Mar-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Table of Coutents PAGE

Review of the Forensic Science Examinations Embodied in the Warren Commission Report

' Introductory Remarks 259

Charles A. McInerney, A,B

The Warren Commission : Report and Hearings 261 . James A. Osterberg, MPA

Assassin Forger 272 Alwyn Cole

Psychiatric Observations on the Warren Commission Report ' 289

Maier Tuchler, M.D.

A Critique of the Medical Aspects of the Investigation into the Assassination of President Kennedy 300

Cyril Wecht, M.D., LL.B.

A Legal Demurrer to the Report of the Warren Com- mission 318

Jay Schwartz, B.S., J.D.

Historical Research, Document Examination and Crown Prince Rudolph of Austria 330

David A. Crown, M.Crim

General Criminalistics in the Courtroom 358

Lowell W. Bradford, B.Sc

Further Observations on Murdering Mothers 373

Werner Tuteur, M.D. and Jacob Matzen M.A

Volume 11, Number 3, July 15GG. JOURNAL OP FORENSIC SCIENCES is puldislied In January, April, July and October by Callaghan & Company at 185 North Archer Avenue, Mundelein, Illinois 00080. Subscription price 325.00 a year, Entered as second-class matter January 17, 1358 at the post office In Mundelein. Illinois, under the Act of March 3, 1873. Copyright 19811 by Callaghan & Company. All rights reserved.

111

JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES

Official Publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences

MORTON F. MASON, Ph.D., Editor Dallas, Toxas

OFFICERS EDITORIAL CONSULTANTS

President

ROBERT B. FORNEY, Ph.D. Indianapolis, Indiana

President-Elect

JACK L. SACHS, LL.B. Chicago, Illinois

Secretary-Treasurer

SAMUEL R. GERBER, M.D. Cleveland, Ohio

DESIGNATED MEMBERS OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

DONALD DOUB Milwaukee, Wis.

Questioned Documents

GEORGE E. HALL, J.D. Chicago, III.

Jurisprudence

THEODORE J. CURPHEY, M.D. Los Angeles, Cal.

Pathology

DWIGHT M. PALMER, M.D. MARY E. COWAN, B.Sc.

Columbus, Ohio Cleveland, Ohio

CHARLES S. PETTY, M.D. Criminalistics . Baltimore, Maryland

MAIER I. MOHLER, M.D. PHILLIP STURGEON, M.D.

Phoenix, Arizona Pacific Palisades, Cal.

CHARLES M. WILSON Immunology

Madison, Wisconsin

The Journal of Forensic Sciences is the official publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. It is devoted to the publica-tion of original investigations and observations in the various branches of the forensic sciences; these include forensic pathology, toxicology, psychiatry, immunology, jurisprudence, criminalistics and questioned documents. The journal will be published quarterly, one volume of four issues appearing each year.

Reviow of the Forensic Science Examina dons Embodied in the Warr Commission Report (A. Panel Discussion) *

Introductory Remarks **

Charles A. McInerney, A.B.*" Moderator, Pittsburgh., Penn-sylvania

In the view of ninny, the American Academy of Forensic Sciences would be remiss if it failed to treat this timely topic, The Forensic Science Examinations Embodied in the Warren Commission Report. It is the opportunity to evaluate the work-ings of a fact-finding body in a case which is familiar to alt. More important, it is an opportunity to study the workings of a commission that had the unique opportunity to investigate a sequence of criminal activities under the optimum condition of unlimited resources in personnel and facilities. The whole of the talents in academic and technical communities of the country, as well as the services of federal agencies, were available to it.

For purposes of this panel discussion it is assumed that all of those present have better than a cursory knowledge of the events surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy. Valuable time, therefore, will not be utilized with a chrono-logical summation. Nor will time be spent in discussing those problems, such as protection and security, which do not fit comfortably into the normal province of this Academy.

The panelists have made an evaluation of the report from the perspectives of their separate disciplines. The approach

* Presented at the Eighteenth Annual lleeting of the American Academy of Foreasie Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, February 24, 1900.

"Received for publication April 9, 1966- Accepted for publication April 10, 1966.

"* Director, Pittsburgh and Allegheny County Crime Laboratory, Pitts-burgh, Pennsylvania.

Vol. 11 • No. 3 259

JOIJR

AN

A 1. O

P l'O

RE

NS

IG S

CIE

NC

ES

PA

GE

S

udden

Death

Due to

Endocard

ial Fib

roelaslo

sis: A C

ase R

eport

334

Brian. D

. Illackboarne, M.D

. and R

obert M. ?ailing „

11.D.

Potassiu

m C

onten

t of th

e Vitreo

us B

ody as an

Aid

in D

eter- m

inin

g th

e Tim

e of D

eath

390

L. 1 fansson, M

.A., ll. U

otila, Ph.D

., M.D

,

R. L

indfors, M.D

. and K. L

aiho, M.D

In

jurie

s of th

e V

erte

bra

l Arte

ry

390 P

otondi, M.1)., P

. Bunn H

e, M.D

. and N

. Kapusz,

Trich

luro

ethan

e Into

xicatio

n: R

eport o

f Tw

o C

ases 4

04

Y. B

. Unit, M

.A. and C

. H. H

ine, M.D

., Ph.D

T

echnical S

ection

Poisoni..,; by V

olatile Com

pounds II. C

hlo

rinate

d A

liphatic

hydro

carb

ons

41.4

R. B

on nichscn, M.D

. and A. C

. Machly, P

h.D

Iden

tification o

f Therap

eutically

Sig

nifican

t Org

anic

Bases b

y T

hin

-Lay

er Chro

mato

grap

hy

423

Irving Sunshine, Ph.D

., Winslow

TV

. Pike, P

h.D.

and Halle L

andcsman, B

.A.

JOU

RN

AL

OF

' FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

O

fficial Publicatio

n o

f the A

merican

Acad

emy o

f Foro

ode :F

ri-aces M

UR

TO

N F

. .'.I AS

O'S

, Ph.D

., Editor

Dallas, T

exas

SAm

tIm. A

. LE

VIN

SON

, M.D

., Ph.D

., Book R

eview E

ditor C

hicago, Illinois

OF

FIC

ER

S

ED

ITO

RIA

L

CO

N:3U

LT

AN

T5

President

DO

NA

LD D

oco JA

CK

L. S

mits, L

L.B

. M

ilwaukee, W

is. C

hicago, Illinois W

ixsoie C. M

ona/411,3f. P

reside re t-Fdeet

Om

aha, Nebraska

Ctram

.F.s S. PET

TY

, M.D

. B

altimore, 13(tuyIand

DO

N T

werp!: M

ims, M

.D., L

L.B

. L

os Angeles, C

alifornia

Crtiatr.m

s S. PET

TY

, M.D

. B

altimore, M

aryland

CA

LE

W

u.som, M

.D.

Seattle, W

ashington

lilt,turOim

, B.S.

Ban.jose, C

alifornia

'AR

RY

LirtO

N, M

.D.

Atlanta, G

eorgia

DW

RN

IT M

. PALM

ER, M

.D.

Colum

bus, Ohio

IavIN0 SU

NSIIIN

F!, Ph.D

. C

leveland, Ohio

Km

' M. D

tramvsm

, Ph.D

. O

klahoma C

ity, Oklahom

a

The Jo

urn

al of F

oren

sic Scien

ces is the o

fficial pullieatio

n of

the A

merican

Acad

emy o

f looro

nsic S

ciences. T

i is dev

oted

to th

e publicatio

n o

f orig

inal in

vestig

ations n

od o

hs'erv

ations in

the

vario

us b

ranch

es of th

e foren

sic sciences; th

ose in

clude fo

rensic

palh

olo

gy, to

xico

logy, p

sych

iatry, L

mm

inolo

gy,

crimin

alisties and q

uestio

ned

docu

monte.. T

he jo

ur cal

publish

ed q

uarterly

, one v

olu

me

of

four issu

es a pp.,:trim

.: etch

y Ott%

-A

rt iv

GE

otmal E

. lam., J.1).

Chicago, Ill.

Secretary-Treasurer

Sam

mt. R

. GER

BER

, M.D

. C

leveland, Ohio

DF

.SIG

NA

TE

D M

EM

BE

RS

OF

E

XE

CU

TIV

E C

OM

MIT

TE

E

LOW

ELL BRAD

FORD

, 13.5. S

an Jose, California

KU

RT

M. D

UB

OW

SKI, P

h.D.

Oklahom

a City, O

klahoma

RO

DE

NT 13. F

OR

NE

Y, P

h.D.

Indianapolis, Indiana

MA

I Flt 1. TucilL

Ett, M

.D.

Phoenix, A

rizona

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

is academ

ic; therefo

re, discip

lined

. There is n

o sp

ecific pu

r-pose to

impugn th

e judgm

ent o

f the W

arren C

om

missio

n, or

to underm

ine th

e United

States g

overn

men

t, or to

enco

urag

e any extrem

ist views of conspiracy.

This is a critiq

ue b

y p

anelists, an

of w

hom

are well qualified

in th

e areas explo

red in

their• d

iscussio

ns. In

those in

stances

where th

e particip

ants treat th

eir subject h

arshly

, these sh

ould

be reco

gnized

as natu

ral conseq

uen

ces of learn

ed, o

bjectiv

e stu

dies, to

tally co

nsisten

t with

the aim

s of th

e Acad

emy to

ad

van

ce the ap

plicatio

n o

f foren

sic sciences. In

fact, the n

ature

of th

is sym

posiu

m is n

ot ap

preciab

ly d

ifferent th

an so

me

presen

ted in

form

er years w

here real case situ

ation

s pro

vid

ed

the basis for panel discussions and mock trials.

Som

e of th

e questio

ns to

be co

nsid

ered are: W

as every

thin

g

done that could have been done? Was anything done that should

no

t hav

e been

clon

e? Were th

e "exp

ert" witn

esses truly

exp

ert? S

ho

uld

additio

nal in

dep

end

ent w

itnesses h

ave b

een co

nsu

lted?

101 C

ourt Iro

use

Pittsb

urg

h, P

enn

sylv

ania 1

52

19

TH

E W

AR

RE

N C

OM

MISSIO

N:

Report and H

earings*

A C

om

lnen

tary o

u Issu

es of Im

po

rtance in

the S

tud

y

of In

vestig

ation an

d C

rimin

alisties

Jam

es W. a

ssob

urg

, MP

A"

The literatu

re of crim

inal in

vestig

ation is sp

arse indeed

. For

this reason alone the Warren C

omm

ission Report is a docum

ent of lan

dm

ark p

roportio

ns. H

ow

ever, th

e inheren

t importan

ce of

the inquiry and the not inconsiderable sum spent by the govern-

men

t to co

nsu

mm

ate the in

vestig

ation are o

ther asp

ects that

con

tribu

te to its sig

nifican

ce. Sin

ce the rep

ort is b

ased o

n a

pro

cedure w

hich

is neith

er• pure crim

inal in

vestig

ation, a trial,

or o

ther reg

ular ju

dicial p

rocess, it affo

rds an

op

po

rtun

ity to

ex

amin

e the n

ature o

f the in

vestig

ative fu

nctio

n an

d to

inquire

wh

ether th

e mean

s cho

sen w

ere the b

est of th

e po

ssible altern

a-tives. In the sub-specialties of forensic science: pathology, crim

i-n

alistics, qu

estion

ed d

ocu

men

ts, and

psy

chiatry

, the p

rinted

testim

on

y rev

eals the state o

f exp

ertise that w

as availab

le at th

e time fo

r this—

the m

ost d

eman

din

g h

om

icide in

vestig

ation

ever u

ndertak

en. A

close read

ing o

f the testim

ony o

f som

e of

the experts utilized, at least in criminaiistics, su

gg

ests that th

ere are so

me areas in

wh

ich th

e basic research

necessary

for th

e objectiv

e evalu

ation o

f evid

ence h

as yet to

be p

erform

ed. In

short, the W

arren Com

mission R

eport is a document of prim

ary im

portan

ce to th

ose w

ho are serio

usly

engag

ed in

the stu

dy o

f the investigative process.

'Presen

ted at th

e Eig

hteen

th A

nn

ual M

eeting

of th

e merlean

Acad

emy

o

f Po

rtman

: Scien

ces, Ch

icago

, Illino

is, Feb

ruary

2-1

, 19

08

. Accep

ted fo

r publication M

ay 28, 19013. *' D

epartm

ent o

f Police A

thuin

itilraLio

n, In

dian

a TJn

ieer,:ity, B

loom

ingto

n,

Indian

a.

24

0

July

1956 V

ol. it • N

o. 3

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

The C

omm

ission was created by P

resident Lyndon B

. Johnson on N

ovem

ber 2

9, 1

963 b

y E

xecu

tive O

rder N

o. 1

1130. T

his

measu

re to in

vestig

ate the assassin

ation o

f Presid

ent Jo

hn F

. K

ennedy on Novem

ber 22, 1963 was undertaken because

Thro

ughout th

e world

, reports o

n th

ese even

ts were d

issemin

ated in

m

assive d

etail. Th

eories an

d sp

eculatio

ns m

ou

nted

regard

ing

the as-

sassinatio

n. In

man

y in

stances, th

e inten

se pub

lic dem

and

for facts

was m

et by p

artial and freq

uen

tly co

nflictin

g rep

orts fro

m D

allas and

elsewhere. A

fter Osw

ald's arrest an

d h

is den

ial of g

uilt, p

ublic atten

-tio

n fo

cused

both

on th

e exten

t of th

e evid

ence ag

ainst h

im an

d th

e possib

ility o

f a consp

iracy, d

om

estic or fo

reign. H

is subseq

uen

t death

heig

hten

ed p

ublic in

terest and stim

ulated

additio

nal su

spicio

ns an

d

rumors (I).

Thus sp

eculatio

n, su

spicio

n, ru

mor, an

d co

nflictin

g rep

orts—

official an

d u

nofficial—

were elem

ents o

f the festerin

g d

oubt

among p

eoples ev

eryw

here in

the w

orld

. How

best to

resolv

e th

is doubt w

as a questio

n th

at required

an im

med

iate answ

er. S

everal p

roced

ures—

inclu

din

g a co

urt o

f inquiry

befo

re a

Tex

as state mag

istrate, a gran

d ju

ry in

vestig

ation in

Dallas

County

, Tex

as, and h

earings b

efore C

ongressio

nal co

mm

ittees of b

oth

houses—

were u

nder co

nsid

eration at o

ne tim

e or an

-oth

er (2). T

he p

rosp

ects for a d

efinitiv

e answ

er from

any o

r all su

ch m

ethods o

f inquiry

were slim

indeed

. The P

residen

t's appointm

ent of the Warren C

omm

ission was a deliberate alterna-

tive that

sought to

avoid

parallel in

vestig

ations an

d to

concen

trate fact findin

g

in a body having the broadest national mandate (3).

The C

om

missio

n w

as giv

en tw

o im

portan

t investig

ative

weapons, viz., the pow

er

to issue subpoenas requiring the testimony of w

itnesses and the produc-tio

n o

f evid

ence

relating to

any m

atter und...• its in

vestig

ation. In

ad

ditio

n, . . . (it co

uld

) . . . com

pel testim

ony fro

m w

itnesses claim

-in

g th

e priv

ilege ag

ainst self-in

crimin

ation u

nder th

e fifth am

endm

ent

to th

e U. S

. Constitu

tion b

y p

rovid

ing fo

r the g

rant o

f imm

unity

to

persons testifying under such compulsion (4).

In addition,

All F

edera

l Agencie

s . . . (were

) . . . dire

cte

d to

furn

ish se

rvic

es

and co

operatio

n to

the

Special

Com

missio

n. T

he C

om

missio

n . . .

(was) . . . also

empow

ered to

conduct an

y fu

rther in

vestig

ation th

at it deem

ed desirable (6).

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

. CO

MM

EN

T O

F A

CR

IMIN

AL

IST

It would

seem th

at the au

thority

and reso

urces o

f the C

om

mis-

sion were com

mensurate w

ith its responsibility to

study an

d rep

ort u

pon all facts an

d circu

mstan

ces relating to

the

assassinatio

n o

f the late P

residen

t, John F

. Ken

ned

y, an

d th

e subse-

quen

t vio

lent d

eath o

f the m

an ch

arged

with

the assassin

ation (6

).

How

the C

om

missio

n p

roceed

ed in

ord

er to acco

mplish

its objectiv

e and h

ow

well it su

cceeded

are two q

uestio

ns o

f great

interest to anyone concerned with the investigative process. T

he C

omm

ission in its report discusses the procedural question : T

he C

om

missio

n h

as functio

ned

neith

er as a court p

residin

g o

ver an

ad

versary

pro

ceedin

g n

or as a p

rosecu

tor d

etermin

ed to

pro

ve a case,

but as a fact fin

din

g ag

ency

com

mitted

to th

e ascertainm

ent o

f the

truth

. In th

e course o

f the in

vestig

ation o

f the facts an

d ru

mors su

r-ro

undin

g th

ese matters, it w

as necessary

to ex

plo

re hearsay

and o

ther

sources o

f info

rmatio

n n

ot ad

missib

le in a co

urt p

roceed

ing o

btain

ed

from

perso

ns w

ho saw

or h

eard an

d o

thei in

a

positio

n to

observ

e w

hat o

ccurred

(7).

The q

uestio

n o

f how

well it su

cceeded

is more d

ifficult to

ap-

praise. T

he d

ata disclo

sed th

rough a sp

ecial surv

ey m

ade b

y

Louis H

arris of a cro

ss-section o

f the A

merican

public sh

ortly

after th

e release of th

e report is p

ossib

ly su

ggestiv

e of its su

c-cess. T

he q

uestio

n an

d resp

onse (in

part) w

ere as follo

ws:

The su

rvey

, com

pleted

after the issu

ance o

f the co

mm

ission

repo

rt, fol-

low

ed an

earlier one tak

en ju

st prio

r to release o

f the rep

ort. P

eople

were ask

ed: F

rom

what y

ou h

ave read

or h

eard, d

o y

ou feel th

e full

story

is in th

e Warren

Com

missio

n R

eport? O

r do y

ou th

ink th

ere are still a lo

t of u

nan

swered

questio

ns ab

out w

ho k

illed P

residen

t John

Kennedy and how

it was clone? (8

).

Percent

Full sto

ry in

report

45 S

till unan

swered

questio

ns

45 N

ot sure 10

Any in

vestig

ation w

hich

fails to satisfy

55 p

ercent o

f those fo

r w

hom

it was m

ade can

hard

ly b

e desig

nated

as outstan

din

g

success. It w

ould

be in

teresting to

repeat th

e poll to

learn w

hat

change, if any, has occurred with tim

e. S

everal carp

ing essay

ists hav

e left a legacy

of critical co

m-

mentary on the fact-finding and explanations offered by the vari-

ous official governmental agencies, including the W

arren Corn-

R62 July 1966

Vol. IA

• N

o. 3

2,63

J H

L U

r U &

KB

SO

LE

NO

ES

missio

n (9

, 10

, 11

). Co

ntrib

utin

g to

this sk

epticism

is the fact

that th

e Com

missio

n, d

espite th

e hig

h q

uality

of its m

embers,

was n

everth

eless a case of th

e gov

ernm

ent in

vestig

ating

itself. T

o w

hat ex

tent su

ch in

credulity

would

hav

e been

mollified

had

greater use been m

ade of nongovernmental investigators is diffi-

cult to

assess. Certain

ly a co

gen

t argum

ent can

be m

ade th

at an

indep

enden

t review

by au

tonom

ous in

vestig

ators, an

d research

sch

olars w

ould

hav

e mad

e for g

reater confid

ence in

the C

orn

-m

ission

repo

rt. Un

fortu

nately

the su

gg

estion

that su

ch p

eop

le m

ight be used in the following m

anner:

To

assist in th

e review

of th

e case as to th

e com

preh

ensiv

eness o

f the

investig

ation. W

ere any in

vestig

ative lead

s not p

ursu

ed to

the u

lti-m

ate? Were an

y o

verlo

ok

ed? A

n o

bjectiv

e, ind

epen

den

t aud

it of th

e in

vestig

ative p

roced

ures b

y p

eop

le com

peten

t in th

e field o

f inv

estiga-

tive ad

min

istration

is a majo

r con

sideratio

n fo

r yo

ur co

mm

ission

(12

).

was rejected

by th

e Gen

eral Counsel fo

r the C

om

missio

n w

ith

the statement that

. . we are h

opefu

l that th

e review

of th

e underly

ing in

vestig

ative

materials b

y ex

perien

ced m

embers o

f our staff w

ill be ad

equate to

en

sure th

at the in

vestig

ation

is tho

rou

gh

and

accurate (1

3).

The dem

ands of good scholarship should have been no different in

this in

quiry

than

they

will b

e when

the m

atter passes fro

m

con

temp

orary

interest to

the co

ncern

of h

istorio

grap

hers. U

n-

fortu

nately

little use w

as mad

e of su

ch sch

olarly

resou

rces and

th

e work

of th

e Com

missio

n is th

e weak

er for it. P

erhap

s, to

paraphrase Clem

enceau, investigation was too im

portant to leave to law

yers! A

n example of scholarly concern w

ith the investigative process is seen

in th

e pap

er by P

rofesso

r William

P. B

row

n (1

4). H

e has su

ggested

that th

e Presid

ent's assassin

ation m

ust b

e re-garded as one of a class of "crim

es of national significance" and th

at in th

ese cases our decentralized policing leaves an obvious gap

in th

e resources an

d co

mpeten

ce necessary

. to d

eal effec-tiv

ely w

ith th

em. F

ollo

win

g a d

iscussio

n o

f how

it would

be

possib

le to im

pro

ve g

reatly fu

ture p

erform

ance in

such

cases th

rough in

stitutio

nalized

investig

ative resp

onsib

ility, h

e furth

er su

ggests th

at the p

reven

tion o

f any sim

ilar travesty

of ju

stice w

ould he

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

, CO

MM

V.N

T O

F A

CR

IMIN

AL

IST

an ap

pro

priate trib

ute to

that g

reat Am

erican w

ho

se death

has b

rou

gh

t to

ou

r attentio

n th

is flaw in

the ad

min

istration

of A

merican

crimin

al justice (1

6).

Th

e assassinatio

n o

f hig

h fed

eral officials h

as since b

een tak

en

care of. Under legislation passed in 1965, this w

ould presumably

be a sim

ple fed

eral offen

se (like treaso

n) in

vestig

ated an

d

pro

secuted

in a ro

utin

e way

by reg

ular fed

eral agen

cies. T

he p

roblem

remain

s how

ever o

f dealin

g effectiv

ely w

ith

oth

er crimes o

f natio

nal sig

nifican

ce such

as the assassin

ation

of foreign dignitaries on our soil.

GE

NE

RA

L C

OM

ME

NT

AR

Y

An ab

undan

ce of p

hysical ev

iden

ce was av

ailable to

the in

-vestig

ators o

f the assassin

ation o

f Presid

ent K

enned

y. F

or ex

-am

ple

, the fo

llow

ing

typ

es o

f clu

e m

ate

rial w

ere

fou

nd

: Im

pressio

ns—

fing

erprin

ts and

palm

prin

ts; hairs an

d fib

ers ; ballistics—

bullets, cartrid

ges, a rifle, a b

ullet h

ole in

glass, an

d

pow

der resid

ue; d

ocu

men

ts—han

dw

riting, p

aper, an

d g

um

med

tape; m

iscellaneous—a photographic negative, w

hose source had to be determ

ined. The profusion of physical evidence, recognized

and collected in the Kennedy case, is at least in part attributable

to the resources which w

ere poured into the investigation. It is in

teresting

to sp

eculate w

heth

er a similar am

ou

nt o

f physical ev

iden

ce is often

availab

le in o

ther h

om

icides. M

ore-

over, if such evidence is present, is it overlooked in many cases

owing to lack of training or education, or is it disregarded ow

ing to the lack of convenient crim

inalistic resources? It is my belief

that th

ere is consid

erable p

hysical ev

iden

ce presen

t at m

any crim

es, not ju

st hom

icides, th

at is not p

rofitab

ly u

tilized fo

r so

me co

mbin

ation o

f the reaso

ns m

entio

ned

above. In

any

even

t a majo

r use o

f ph

ysical ev

iden

ce is to estab

lish a co

nn

ec-tio

n b

etween

the crim

e scene an

d th

e crimin

al. This m

ight b

e term

ed th

e dev

elop

men

t of

associative evidence (1

6). T

his

represents the greatest use made of the physical evidence in the

Kennedy hom

icide.

INIT

IZP

IZE

TA

TIO

N A

ND

I1ES

EA

RC

II

A clo

se reader o

f the W

arren C

om

missio

n H

earing

s and

Re-

port will recognize through com

parison of some of the testim

ony

2134 July 1966

Vol 1

1 • N

o. 3

265

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

, CO

MM

EN

T O

F A

CR

IMIN

AL

IST

an

adm

ission o

f a softly

-men

tioned

pro

blem

in crim

inalistics,

viz. th

e philo

sophical b

asis of in

terpretatio

n o

f laborato

ry d

ata obtain

ed th

rough th

e exam

inatio

n o

f physical ev

iden

ce. The

testimony also

unw

ittingly

undersco

res the g

enuin

e need

for

long-overdue, fundamental research w

hich is necessary in order to

establish

objectiv

e criteria for th

e evalu

ation o

f physical

evidence.

Dichotom

y in Interpretation In

its simplest term

s the d

ichoto

my in

evid

ence in

terpreta-

tion may be stated as the black and w

hite versus the black, gray, an

d w

hite v

iews. A

lmost all fin

gerp

rint ex

perts are n

ow

in

com

plete ag

reemen

t with

the fo

rmer co

ncep

t, as are som

e fire-arm

s experts (1

7). R

arely h

ow

ever are an

y o

f these in

div

iduals

trained

as scientists, so

that th

e "it is" or "it is n

ot" p

hilo

sophy

is readily

accepted

as satisfactory

. Furth

ermore, as testim

ony,

this v

iew m

eets the req

uirem

ents so

metim

es dem

anded

by th

e legal m

ind; it d

oes n

ot p

roduce th

e conflict w

hich

results w

hen

th

e "gray

" area of d

oubt in

trudes. T

his d

isagreem

ent is re-

flected in

the h

earings. F

irst let us co

nsid

er the statem

ent

of the black-white view

(18).

Q. . . . d

o y

ou feet th

at the am

ount o

f mark

ings h

ere were su

ffi-cient to m

ake positive identification? A

. Yes, sir.

Q. H

ave y

ou m

ade id

entificatio

n in

the p

ast with

as few o

r less m

arkings as are present on this bullet fragment ?

A. O

h, y

es; a

nd on

less, much

less of an

area. The ch

aracter of

the marks is m

ore important than the num

ber of the marks.

Q. . . . h

ere you w

ere of co

urse u

nab

le to see all o

f the lin

es which

w

ere presen

t on th

e bullet b

efore m

utilatio

n. H

ave y

ou ev

er had

an

occasio

n w

here y

ou ex

amin

ed a b

ullet an

d saw

one p

ortio

n o

f it which

w

as an ap

paren

t match

and th

en fo

und o

ut th

at the b

alance o

f the

bullet w

as not an

apparen

t match

? A

. No, sir; a

nd if

I understan

d y

our w

ord

s "apparen

t match

," th

ere is no su

ch th

ing as an

apparen

t match

. It either is an

iden

tifica-tio

n o

r it isn't, an

d u

ntil y

ou m

ade u

p y

our m

ind, y

ou d

on't h

ave an

appare

nt m

atc

h. W

e d

on't a

ctu

ally

use

that te

rm . . U

nle

ss you

hav

e sufficien

t mark

s for an

iden

tification, y

ou can

not say

one w

ay

or th

e oth

er as to w

heth

er or n

ot tw

o b

ullets w

ere fired fro

m a p

ar-ticu

lar barrel.

In o

ther w

ord

s, you can

not n

anid

entify

on th

e absen

ce of sim

ilarities an

y m

ore th

an y

ou can

iden

tify w

hen

you h

ave n

o sim

ilarities presen

t.

Q. In

oth

er word

s, you w

on't m

ake an

iden

tification u

nless y

ou feel

enough m

arks are p

resent to

constitu

te a basis fo

r a positiv

e iden

tifi-catio

n?

A. T

hat is rig

ht, an

d I w

ould

not rep

ort an

y ty

pe o

f similarities

unless th

ey w

ere sufficien

t for an

iden

tification, b

ecause u

nless y

ou

can say

one b

ullet w

as fired fro

m th

e same b

arrel as a second b

ullet,

then

there is ro

om

for erro

r, and in

this field

of firearm

s iden

tifica-tion, w

e try to avoid any possible chance of error creeping in. Q

. Do you avoid the category of "probable" identification?

A. O

h, y

es; we n

ever u

se it, nev

er. Q

. And w

hy is th

at? A

. There is n

o su

ch th

ing as a p

robab

le iden

tification, it eith

er is or isn't as far as w

e are concerned. Q

. And in

this case it is?

A. It is, y

es.

In a d

iscussio

n in

volv

ing a d

ifferent set o

f bullets (o

r com

-m

ission exhibits). anoth

er witn

ess presen

ted th

e "gray

" view

-point w

hen the issue was raised by counsel (19).

Q. . . . w

e h

ad te

stimony . . . y

este

rday . . . th

at th

e . . .

(lab-

oratory) does n

ot m

ake p

robab

le iden

tifications, b

ut m

erely p

ositiv

e or negative identifications.

A. I a

m a

ware o

f their p

ositio

n. T

his is n

ot, I am

sure, arriv

ed at

with

out carefu

l consid

eration. H

ow

ever, to

say th

at becau

se one d

oes

not fin

d su

fficient m

arks fo

r iden

tification th

at it is a neg

ative,

I th

ink is g

oin

g o

verb

oard

in th

e oth

er directio

n. A

nd fo

r purp

oses o

f pro

bativ

e valu

e for w

hatev

er it mig

ht b

e worth

, in th

e absen

ce of

very

defin

ite neg

ative ev

iden

ce, I thin

k it is p

ermissib

le to say

that

in an

exhib

it such

as 573 th

ere is enough o

n it to

say th

at it could

hav

e com

e, and ev

en p

erhap

s a little stronger, to

say th

at it pro

bab

ly

came fro

m th

is, with

out g

oin

g so

far as to say

to th

e exclu

sion o

f all other guns. T

his I could not do. Q

. As I u

nderstan

d y

our testim

ony, th

erefore, y

ou feel th

at there

are sufficien

t iden

tical micro

scopic ch

aracteristics on 5

72 an

d 5

73 to

say

that th

ey w

ere pro

bab

ly fired

from

the sam

e weap

on, b

ut n

ot

enough to

say th

at they

were d

efinitely

fired fro

m th

e same w

eapon.

A. Y

es. My o

pin

ion w

ould

be b

ased u

pon th

e findin

g o

f families o

f lin

es that w

ould

be o

f the o

rder o

f two to

four fin

e striations o

n th

e burr th

at I referred to

. For a stro

nger id

entificatio

n, I w

ould

wan

t a larg

er gro

up, I w

ould

wan

t perh

aps fiv

e or six

in a g

iven

area, all m

atchin

g in

terms o

f conto

ur as w

ell as positio

n. B

ut th

is I did

not

find. A

nd so

for th

at reason, I w

ould

not w

ant !_

o ex

press th

is as a positiv

e findin

g. H

ow

ever, I w

cnld

not w

ant to

be m

isundersto

od o

r su

ggest th

at this co

uld

not h

ave co

me fro

m th

at particu

lar gun.

The literature supports the "gray" view

taken by the East w

it-ness q

uoted

. Indeed

, an ev

en m

ore so

phisticated

statemen

t (al-

266 July 1966

'Vol. 1

1 • N

o. 3

267

•■• ■•■■■••

■••••■•• .4,11.

AL L.L......1,1

01.s

, A

-ra

LS

O

though co

ncern

ing to

ol m

arks rath

er than

bullets) n

everth

eless expresses the m

ost comm

on view held by crim

inalists about evi-den

ce interp

retation (2

0).

As a resu

lt of th

e micro

scopic o

r photo

grap

hic co

mpariso

ns m

ade,

four conclusions are possible: 1.

No o

pin

ion o

r conclu

sion is reach

ed d

ue to

alteration in

the

questioned mark or tool since the crim

e occurred. 2

. T

he questioned tool did not make the evidence m

ark. 3.

The q

uestio

ned

tool m

ay h

ave m

ade th

e evid

ence m

ark, b

ut a

conclusive identification is n

ot ju

stified. M

ost cases in

volv

ing to

ol

mark

s where o

nly

class characteristics o

f the to

ol are p

resent fall in

th

is category

. Occasio

nally

, this co

nclu

sion m

ay rem

ain after m

icro-

scopic co

mpariso

n. T

he stren

gth

or v

alue o

f this co

nclu

sion

may

vary

greatly

and d

epen

ds u

pon th

e exam

iner's ju

dgm

ent o

f the p

robab

ilities involved.

4.

The questioned tool did produce the evidence m

ark.

Research R

equirements

Intim

ately co

nnected

with

the q

uestio

n o

f interp

retation is

the p

roblem

of b

asic data, u

pon w

hich

objectiv

e criteria for

the ev

aluatio

n n o

f physical ev

iden

ce must b

e based

. If the

re-

search w

ork

had

been

done an

d h

ad b

een p

ublish

ed, th

e pro

b-

lem w

ould

be relativ

ely sim

ple an

d su

ch an

evalu

ation p

ossib

le. T

his in

disp

ensab

le, laborio

us w

ork

was started

long ag

o an

d

contin

ues at a fan

tastic pace in

the estab

lished

sciences. In

crim

inalistics h

ow

ever, w

here m

uch

of th

e pio

neerin

g effo

rt w

as by n

onscien

tists (as in b

allistics or firearm

s iden

tifica-tio

n, fo

r exam

ple) th

ere is a grav

e deficien

cy in

publish

ed d

ata. In

deed

, it is almost n

onex

istent. T

estimo

ny rep

orted

in th

e hear-

ings em

phasizes u

nin

tentio

nally

the scarcity

of p

ublish

ed d

ata th

rough failu

re to m

entio

n an

y jo

urn

als in w

hich

such

vital

info

rmatio

n is av

ailable. T

he su

bjectiv

e basis o

f firearms

iden

tification an

d th

e serious d

eficiency

of d

ata are clearly re-

vealed in the following testim

ony:

Q. F

inally

, we h

ad d

iscussed

briefly

your ex

amin

ation o

f consecu

-tively m

anufactured bolt faces to see whether any tw

o such consecutive-ly

man

ufactu

red b

olt faces w

ere iden

tical in their m

icroscopic charac-teristics. H

ew m

any su

ch ex

amin

ation

s hav

e you p

erform

ed?

A. I w

ou

ld sa

y a

bou

t fou

r exam

inatio

ns o

f pairs o

f bo

lt faces

which have been consecutively m

anufactured. Q

. And in

each case th

e result w

as chat?

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

, CO

MM

EN

T O

P A

OR

IMIN

AL

IST

A. T

he m

arks o

n o

ne b

olt face in

no w

ay resem

bled

the m

arks o

n

the o

ther b

olt face (2

1).

Q. H

ave y

ou ex

amin

ed co

nsecu

tively

man

ufactu

red b

arrels to d

e-term

ine w

heth

er their m

icrosco

pic ch

aracteristics are iden

tical? A

. Yes, sir; I h

ave th

ree differen

t sets of, y

ou m

ight say

, paired

barrels, w

hich

hav

e been

man

ufactu

red o

n th

e same m

achin

e, one

after the o

ther, u

nder co

ntro

lled co

nditio

ns to

mak

e them

ns n

early

alike as p

ossib

le, and in

each case fired

bullets fro

m th

ose b

arrels co

uld

not b

e iden

tified w

ith each

oth

er; in fact, th

ey lo

oked

noth

ing

at all alike as far as in

div

idual m

icrosco

pic ch

aracteristics are con-

cerned

. Their riflin

g im

pressio

ns o

f course w

ould

be id

entical, b

ut th

e individual m

arks there would be entirely different (22).

This testim

ony is typical of the type of explanation offered by ex

perts th

roughout th

e country

in th

is area of crim

inalistics

and accep

ted b

y co

urts at all lev

els. Therefo

re it is not h

ere in

tended

to q

uestio

n th

e findin

gs o

r qualificatio

ns o

f the fire-

arms ex

pert testify

ing, b

ut rath

er to em

phasize th

at there is

a deficien

cy o

f publish

ed in

form

ation av

ailable fo

r reference

purp

oses. A

lready so

me o

utsid

ers who fo

r the

first tim

e are lo

okin

g in

to th

e merits o

f scientific crim

e detectio

n, h

ave co

m-

men

ted w

ith asto

nish

men

t (relative to

lie detectio

n) o

n th

e lack

of b

asic research an

d th

e need

for acq

uisitio

n o

f data (2

3).

Unless m

easures are taken to correct this pervasive shortcoming

in m

any areas o

f crimin

alistics, the d

ay is n

ot far o

ff when

the

legal profession will becom

e sufficiently sophisticated in science to

mak

e cross-ex

amin

ation a ju

stifiably

harro

win

g ex

perien

ce. P

resently

it is the scien

tific ignoran

ce of law

yers o

nly

that

permits m

uch of the testimony of crim

e laboratory experts to go relativ

ely u

nch

allenged

. These statem

ents are n

ot a criticism

of

particu

lar indiv

iduals b

ut o

f police ad

min

istration in

gen

eral w

hich has not responded to the recomm

endations of many crim

e laboratory w

orkers that this state of ignorance must be rem

edied th

rough creatio

n o

f opportu

nities fo

r applied

research. A

s the

United

States S

uprem

e Court clo

ses the d

oor o

n trad

itional

investig

ative p

ractice, greater u

se is goin

g to

hav

e to b

e mad

e of p

hysical ev

iden

ce at crime scen

es. Crim

inalistics, as an

or-

gan

ized field

of k

now

ledge, still h

as hom

ework

to d

o b

efore

it can p

lay its fu

llest role in

this n

ew era th

at has b

een th

rust

upon law enforcem

ent.

268 'Illy

1956 V

ol. 1

1 • N

o. 3

269

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T, O

W M

EN

T O

F A

OR

IMIN

AL

IST

SU

M.N

1AR

Y A

ND

CO

NC

LU

SIO

NS

1.

Th

e in

ve

stig

ativ

e p

roced

ure

of th

e W

arre

n C

om

mis

sio

n

in so

nic areas o

f crimin

alistics has b

een d

iscussed

in' term

s of

stated o

bjectiv

es and th

e mean

s emplo

yed

to ach

ieve th

em.

2.

Plxam

ination of testimony, especially in instances illustrat-

ing d

ichoto

my o

f interp

retation, em

phasizes th

e need

for g

reat ex

pan

sion

of ap

plied

research in

crimin

alistic matters.

3.

Th

ere

is little d

ou

bt th

at th

e a

rch

ival m

ate

rial n

ow

assem

bled

in th

e form

of reco

rds an

d rep

orts o

f the ag

encies

involv

ed in

Presid

ent K

enned

y's assassin

ation p

rovid

e the b

asis fo

r furth

er study in

to th

e questio

n o

f investig

ative p

ractice and

theory.

RE

FE

RE

NC

ES

1. P

residen

t of th

e United

States. P

residen

t's Com

missio

n o

n th

e As-

sassinatio

n o

f Presid

ent K

enn

edy

. Rep

ort. W

ashin

gto

n, D

. C.: U

. S.

Governm

ent Printing O

ffice, 1064, p. ix.

2.

Ibid, p. x. 3.

Mid, p. x.

4.

Mid, p. xi.

6.

Mid, p. 412.

11. Ibid, p. 472. 7.

Ibid, p. xiv. 8.

Harris, L

ouis. "M

any D

oubtfu

l On A

ssassinatio

n," C

ourier Jo

urn

al (L

ouisville), p. 13, October 10, 1964.

9.

Joesten

, J. Osw

ald: A

ssassin o

r Fall G

uy

? New

Yo

rk: M

arzani M

an-

sell, 1964. 1

0. B

uch

nnan

, Thom

as G. W

ho K

illed K

enned

y ? N

ew Y

ork

: Putn

am's

Sons, 1064.

11

. Farn

sworth

, C. H

. "Brito

n Q

uestio

ns W

arren F

indin

gs," N

ew Y

ork

T

imes, p. 30, D

ecember 14, 1964.

12

. Perso

nal letter to

Chief Ju

stice Earl W

arren, d

ated D

ecember 1

7, 1

963.

13

. Perso

nal letter fro

m J. L

ee Ran

kin

, Gen

eral Co

un

sel of th

e Warren

C

omm

ission, dated January 15, 1964. 1

4. Ilr•Jw

n, W

. P. "C

rimes o

f Natio

nal S

ign

ificance," J. C

rim. L

aw, C

rint-

inel. and Pol. S

ci. 55, 509-513 (1964). 1

5.

Ibid, p. 513. 1

6. O

sterbu

rg, J. W

. "Sig

nifican

t Co

ncep

ts in S

cientific C

rimin

al Inv

esti-gatio

n," L

aw an

d O

rder 1

2, 2

6 (Ju

ly 1

964).

17

. Hatch

er, J. S., Jury, F

. J., an

d

J. W

eller. Firearm

s Inv

estigatio

n

Ven

t; fication

and

Evid

ence, p

. 18

6. S

tackpole

Co

., Harrisb

urg

, Pa.

1957). 13. P

resident of the United S

tatcs, up. cit., Vol. III, p. 434.

19. p.

20. H

urd

, D. Q

., and

R. S

. Green

e. To

ol M

ark C

om

pariso

ns in

Crim

inal

Investig

ation. J. C

rim. L

aw., C

rimin

al. and P

ol. S

ri. 39, 3

79-3

91, p

p.

382-383 (1948). 21.

President of the U

nited States, op. cit., V

ol. III, p. 421. 22.

Ibid, p. 429. 23.

United

States C

ongress. H

ouse o

f Rep

resentativ

es Subco

mm

ittee of

the C

om

mittee o

n G

ov

ernm

ent O

peratio

ns. U

se of P

oly

grap

hs as "L

ie D

etectors" b

y th

e Fed

eral Govern

men

t. 89th

Cong., let S

ession, 1

066.

Hearin

g, P

art 6-T

estimo

ny

of D

epartm

ent o

f Defen

se Witn

esses, pp. 659-660, A

ugust 19, 1965.

Departm

ent of Police A

dministration

Indiana University

Bloom

ington, Indiana

r•

270 July 1966

Vol. 1

l • No. 3

271

Assassin F

orger*

(Docu

men

ts related to

the p

urch

ase of th

e um

rder

weap

ons, an

d o

ther asp

ects of th

e investig

ation b

y th

e P

residen

t's Com

missio

n o

n th

e Assassin

ation o

f Presi-

den

t Ken

ned

y)

Alw

yn Cole **

When

I am called

"docu

men

t exam

iner" I can

say w

ith m

uch

co

rdiality

and co

nsid

erable tru

th "Y

ou are an

oth

er," becau

se th

e use o

f docu

men

ts in h

um

an affairs is u

niv

ersal and ev

ery-

one m

ust e

xam

ine th

em

, not ju

st for in

form

atio

n, b

ut fo

r v

alidity

. An

y b

usy

man

is likely

to p

rod

uce sev

eral do

cum

ents

every

day

and

receive a n

um

ber fo

r action

. Th

ese do

cum

ents

are not accep

ted o

ffhan

d b

ut th

ey are q

uestio

ned

, perh

aps n

ot

conscio

usly

and d

eliberately

, but b

y alm

ost au

tom

atic review

of o

ne's ex

perien

ce in d

ealing w

ith sim

ilar docu

men

ts. A fa-

miliar term

to d

ocu

men

t exam

iners is "stan

dard

for co

mpari-

son." T

he b

asic experien

ce every

one h

as in d

ealing w

ith d

ocu

-m

ents m

ay h

e called th

e standard

for test o

f any cu

rrently

questio

ned

docu

men

t. In th

e ord

inary

use o

f docu

men

ts, ques-tions are lik

ely to

be, "Is th

e signatu

re gen

uin

e?" "Was th

e docu

men

t put fo

rth in

good faith

?" "Does th

e docu

men

t hav

e so

me sig

nifican

ce bey

ond its su

perficial o

r obvio

us n

eanin

g?"

These q

uestio

ns are ask

ed an

d an

swered

quite rap

idly

and in

m

ost in

stances th

e docu

men

t is quick

ly p

assed as g

enuin

e, or

pro

mptly

acted u

pon, b

ut w

hen on

e of th

ese qu

estion

s fails to

pro

duce a atisfacto

ry an

swer, th

e docu

men

t may

be tested

m

ore rig

oro

!!sly an

d it is u

sually

as the resu

lt of th

ese more

searching questions that the document eX

! 14iiner is called upon

Pre5

ented

at the E

ighteen

th A

nnual M

eeting o

f the A

merican

Acad

emy

of F

urr.n

sic Seien

tes, Feb

ruary

24, 1

8011, C

hi. Ig

o, Illin

ois. S

ubm

itted fo

r p

ub

ileation

Feb

ruary

20

, Mi. A

ccepted

for p

ub

lication

Ap

ril 18

, 10

68

. *" E

xaminer of (111..A

ioned Doe

■ :nents, Washington, D

. C.

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

—F

OR

GE

D D

OC

UM

EN

TS

for clo

se study o

f docu

men

ts that h

ave failed

to p

ass regular

tests for v

alidity

. So it is th

at the d

ocu

men

t exam

iner d

epen

ds

upon others to ask the initial questions. While the great m

ajority of d

ocu

men

ts are gen

uin

e, the p

ossib

ility o

f forg

ery is alw

ays

presen

t. Pro

bab

ly so

me fo

rgeries are n

ever q

uestio

ned

, and w

e know

that so

nic are n

ot q

uestio

ned

soon en

ough to

prev

ent th

e harm

of w

hich

they

are capab

le. Lee H

arvey

Osw

ald ro

vid

ed

hima w

ith p

hoto

grap

hic co

unterfeits o

f iden

tification can

s a fictitio

us n

ame. W

e do n

ot k

now

how

man

y o

ppor-

tun

ities there m

igh

t hav

e been

for th

ese cards to

be q

uestio

ned

, an

d w

e cannot h

elp ask

ing th

e questio

n, ev

en th

ough it m

ay

no

t hav

e an an

swer, at w

hat p

oin

t was O

swald

set irretrievab

ly

upon th

e path

of an

assassin? W

as it from

the d

ay th

at he

found a m

ethod fo

r creating b

y fo

rged

iden

tification card

s th

e fictitious ch

aracter A. J. H

idell in

whose n

ame th

e murd

er w

eapo

ns w

ere pu

rchased

? Co

uld

early d

etection

of th

ese counterfeits have turned him

from his course?

A d

ocu

men

t is defin

ed in

part as an

y m

aterial substan

ce bearin

g a rep

resentatio

n o

f the th

oughts o

f men

by m

eans o

f an

y sp

ecies of co

nven

tional m

ark o

r sym

bol. A

significan

t elem

ent in

this d

efinitio

n is th

at a docu

men

t is a record

of

-the thoughts of men. D

ocuments give inform

ation about actions, acco

mplish

ed o

r pro

posed

, and th

ey g

ive in

form

ation ab

out

the id

entity

of p

erson

s, thu

s sho

win

g resp

on

sibility

for actio

ns,

which

, unhap

pily

, are som

etimes h

armfu

l or u

nlaw

ful.

The ex

amin

er of q

uestio

ned

docu

men

ts is concern

ed w

ith a

do

cum

ent as a reco

rd o

f tho

ug

hts—

no

t necessarily

as ideas b

ut

as purp

oses—

and h

e is concern

ed w

ith p

aper an

d in

k as th

e m

aterial substan

ces, with

pen

and p

encil as th

e instru

men

ts, an

d o

ften w

ith h

andw

riting, n

ot ju

st as conven

tional sy

mbols

but as in

div

idual an

d id

entifiab

le sym

bols. T

he ex

amin

er is co

ncern

ed w

ith m

any o

ther m

aterials or o

bjects th

at may

be a

part o

f a do

cum

ent o

r affect a do

cum

ent. T

he u

sual p

urp

ose

for ex

amin

ation

is to fo

rm a co

nclu

sion ab

out au

thorsh

ip,

or about the source of a docu

men

t, or ab

out its relatio

nsh

ips to

oth

er docu

men

ts or o

ther th

ings, e. g.,

tho

se wh

ich m

ay fix

the true date of a questioned docum

ent. M

ost d

ocu

men

ts are bro

ught to

the ex

amin

er's laborato

ry

with a specific question, but study of them

is not usually limited

to sco

rch fo

r an an

swer to

a single q

uery

. The ex

amin

er fre-

272 July 1960

Vol. 11 • N

o. 3 273

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

quen

tly p

oses m

any o

ther q

uestio

ns to

advan

ce his stu

dy o

f the

docu

men

t. This h

abit o

f seeing th

e docu

men

t as a whole is n

ot

by an

y m

eans an

effort to

invad

e oth

er fields o

f study th

at hav

e a more fo

rmal co

ncern

with

the m

eanin

g o

f a docu

men

t, b

ut th

e exam

iner

will h

ave d

iscovered

early in

his w

ork

that

he can

not m

ake a co

mplete ex

amin

ation, ev

en to

answ

er a lim

ited q

uestio

n, u

nless h

e takes a b

road

view

of th

e do

cum

ent,

whic

h v

iew

must in

clu

de n

ot ju

st an e

ffort to

answ

er a

questio

n, say

of au

thorsh

ip o

f a signatu

re, or p

resence o

f an

alteration, b

ut m

ust em

brace th

e docu

men

t from

the b

road

est asp

ect of its d

efinitio

n as a reco

rd o

f the th

oughts o

r purp

oses:

of m

en. T

his ap

pro

ach o

ften d

evelo

ps ad

ditio

nal im

portan

t inform

ation, and also it is one of the ways the exam

iner remains

keen about his work.

Th

e ph

ysical d

ocu

men

t, as op

po

sed to

an o

ral statemen

t, offers attractiv

e opportu

nities fo

r exten

ded

study. W

hen

ever

do

cum

ents are in

vo

lved

in an

imp

ortan

t or n

oto

riou

s even

t, it is the custom

to make the studies in de t

Docu

men

ts dem

and o

ur atten

tion fo

r as long as th

ey m

ay

giv

e som

e new

thread

of in

form

ation

, or g

ive m

aterial for n

ew

interp

retations o

f even

ts. No d

oubt th

is will b

e true o

f the

docu

men

ts connected

with

the assassin

ation o

f Presid

ent Jo

hn

F. K

enned

y in

the city

of D

allas, on N

ovem

ber 2

2, 1

963, th

e killin

g o

f police o

fficer J. D. T

ippit, an

d th

e death

of L

ee H

arvey Osw

ald two days later.

The p

rincip

al docu

men

ts are those w

hich

bear u

pon th

e pur-

chase an

d d

elivery

of th

e carbin

e with

telescopic sig

hts used

to fire th

e fatal sho

ts from

the six

th flo

or o

f the T

exas S

cho

ol

Book D

eposito

ry, d

ocu

men

ts connected

with

the p

urch

ase and

deliv

ery o

f the p

istol u

sed to

kill o

fficer Tip

pit, an

d d

ocu

men

ts w

hich

show

ed th

e establish

men

t of th

e alias in th

e nam

e of

Alek

James 'E

dell. T

hese d

ocu

men

ts were n

ot im

med

iately

availab

le at the tim

e of th

e assassinatio

n b

ut w

ere disclo

sed

t

by p

ainstak

ing in

vestig

ation. U

nder q

uestio

nin

g b

y D

allas police an

d fed

eral law en

forcem

ent o

fficers imm

ediately

after arrest,

Lee H

arvey

Osw

ald d

enied

any

con

nectio

n w

ith th

e death

s of

Presid

ent K

enned

y an

d

officer T

ippit. H

e lived

barely

43 h

ours fro

m th

e tim

e of h

is arrest; therefo

re, the

information

dev

doped

by stu

dy o

f docu

men

ts is of g

reat im-

portance.

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

—F

OR

GE

D D

OC

UM

EN

TS

The assem

bly

of q

uestio

ned

do

cum

ents th

at may

app

ear to

bear upon a crime usually occurs before collection of necessary

standard

s for co

mpariso

n, an

d w

e hav

e observ

ed th

at som

e in

vestig

ato

rs seem

to fe

el th

at th

e m

ain

part o

f the jo

b is

finish

ed o

nce th

e questio

ned

docu

men

ts hav

e been

found, b

ut

the first co

ncern

of th

e docu

men

t exam

iner is ab

out th

e natu

re and e

xte

nt o

f the sta

ndard

s. To c

onsid

er o

ur p

ositio

n fo

r form

ing conclusions about the documents related to the assassina-

tion o

f Presid

ent K

enned

y, it is in

ord

er to rev

iew th

ose d

ocu

-m

ents w

hich

may

be reg

arded

as stand

ards fo

r com

pariso

n.

Th

ese stand

ards also

giv

e info

rmatio

n ab

out th

e temperam

ent,

problems, and m

ovements of L

ee Harvey O

swald.

When

a perso

n is su

spected

of a crim

e which

requires stu

dy

of d

ocu

men

ts it may

be fo

un

d th

at he h

as lived

a shallo

w

and n

arro

w life

that p

roduced fe

w d

ocum

ents fo

r use

as

stand

ards. W

hile it can

no

t be said

that O

swald

lived

a full

life in a co

nstru

ctive sen

se, he d

id p

roduce a g

ood v

ariety

of d

ocu

men

ts, particu

larly th

ose th

at gav

e exam

ples o

f han

d-

writin

g an

d h

and p

rintin

g. In

deed

, it seemed

to b

e a part o

f O

swald

's perso

nality

to p

roduce m

ore w

riting th

an n

ecessary

in a g

iven

situatio

n: w

itness, th

e three letters to

the Im

mig

ra-tio

n an

d N

aturalizatio

n S

ervice, Item

(b) b

elow

, all mak

ing th

e sam

e inq

uiry

, and

the fiv

e pag

e brief in

sup

po

rt of ap

plicatio

n

for rev

iew o

f his u

nd

esirable m

ilitary d

ischarg

e, a do

cum

ent

hav

ing little in

form

ation b

ut m

uch

wiltin

g. T

he p

rincip

al d

ocu

men

ts bearin

g stan

dard

writin

gs (1

) are as follo

ws:

(a) A

sing

le-pag

e han

dw

ritten letter to

the D

epartm

ent o

f S

tate received

there N

ovem

ber, 1

962, tran

smittin

g

a paym

ent on a loan advanced by the United S

tates Em

bassy in

Mosco

w. T

he letter h

as a brisk

, busin

esslike to

ne,

giv

ing th

e account n

um

ber an

d d

eman

din

g a receip

t for

the payment. T

he signature is that of Lee H

. Osw

ald, and th

e add

ress is giv

en as P

. 0. B

ox 2

915, D

allas, Tex

as. T

his ad

dress m

akes th

e letter especially

valu

able as a

standard

for co

mpariso

n b

ecause th

e same ad

dress ap

-pears on four of the questioned docum

ents, as the one for delivery of the assassination w

eapons. (b)

Th

ree sing

le-pag

e han

dw

ritten letters fro

m O

swald

to

offices o

f the U

nited

States Im

mig

ration an

d N

aturalize-

274 Ju

ly 1

565

Vol. 1

1 • N

o. 3

275

re.) T 0 fe PA fitRg

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T—

FO

RG

ED

DO

CU

ME

NT

S

lion S

ervice in

San

Anto

nio

, Fort W

orth

, and D

allas, T

exas, after his return from M

oscow w

here he had offered to

giv

e up h

is United

States citizen

ship

. In th

ese letters he m

akes sharp inquiries about a certificate of citizenship fo

r his fo

ur-m

onth

-old

dau

ghter b

orn

in R

ussia. E

ach

lette

r is signed a

nd e

ach le

tter in

clu

des so

me h

and

Prin

ting alo

ng w

ith th

e larger b

ody o

f cursiv

e writin

g.

The h

and p

rintin

g is im

portan

t as a standard

becau

se som

e of the questioned material is in that style.

(c) A

pplicatio

n fo

r review

of u

ndesirab

le disch

arge fro

m

the U

nited

States M

arine C

orp

s filed w

ith th

e Dep

art.. m

ent of Defense in June, 1962, containing a considerable

quan

tity o

f han

d p

rintin

g an

d a b

rief in su

pport o

f the

applicatio

n ru

nnin

g to

five p

ages o

f cursiv

e writin

g:

The a

ddre

ss is giv

en a

s Kalin

inia

Stre

et, M

insk

, U

. S. S

. R. a

t the e

nd o

f the b

rief. T

he "

K" o

f "K

alinin

ia" is importan

t for co

mpariso

n w

ith th

e first letter o

f the n

ame o

f the firm

from

which

the assassin

a-tio

n rifle w

as purch

ased. A

certain "G

" in th

e word

"G

lenview

" on th

e fourth

line o

f the first p

age o

f the

brie

f is importa

nt fo

r com

pariso

n w

ith th

e "G

" of

"Goods" in the nam

e of the firm that supplied the m

urder w

eapon. (d)

An application filed w

ith the Departm

ent of State, show

-ing issuance of a passport to L

ee Harvey O

swald, bearing

han

d p

rintin

g, a sig

natu

re, and a p

hoto

grap

h. T

his is

of th

e same p

erson sh

ow

n in

the p

hoto

grap

h o

n th

e co

unterfeit S

elective S

ervice C

ard, b

earing th

e nam

e "A

lek James H

idell," Item 7 below

. T

wo en

velo

pes, p

ostm

arked

Fort W

orth

, Tex

as, June 1

9,

(e) L

962, an

d A

ugust 1

, 1962, ad

dressed

to th

e Nav

y D

is-ch

arge R

eview

(one read

s "Roveiw

") Board

, Wash

ingto

n

25, D

. C. T

hese en

velo

pes sh

ow

two v

ariations o

f han

d

prin

ting, o

ne th

at is chiefly

low

er case, and th

e oth

er ch

iefly u

pper case, b

ut also

show

ing, as d

oes m

ost o

f O

swald

's oth

er han

d p

rint b

ig, a m

ixtu

re of th

e two

styles. T

his illu

strates the tru

ism th

at a perso

n d

oes n

ot

record

all of h

is writin

g h

abit in

any sin

gle sp

ecimen

but m

ay req

uire sev

eral docu

men

ts prep

ared at d

ifferent

times to approach a com

plete recording.

(f) A

dia

ry o

f many p

ages m

ain

tain

ed b

y L

ee H

arv

ey

Osw

ald w

hile in

Russia an

d p

robab

ly co

ntin

ued

after his retu

rn to

the U

nited

States (2

). These d

iary sh

eets hav

e stains ty

pical o

f those k

now

n to

result fro

m effo

rts to

dev

elop laten

t fingerp

rints, b

ut th

e writin

g is still

legible and can be photographed to give a somew

hat better leg

ibility

than

the stain

ed o

rigin

als so th

at they

serve

well as stan

dard

s for co

mpariso

n. O

swald

was ab

le to

write at a fair sp

eed b

ut n

ot w

ith

easy fluen

cy w

hen

try

ing to

achiev

e best leg

ibility

so th

at the h

and p

rintin

g

of th

is man

y p

aged

diary

must h

ave b

een an

onero

us

task for him.

(g) A

note

to th

e A

meric

an C

ivil L

ibertie

s Unio

n, re

-ceiv

ed N

ovem

ber 4

, 1963, w

ith acco

mpan

yin

g card

m

ade o

ut b

y L

ee IL O

swald

. This card

show

s som

e of O

swald

's best h

and p

rintin

g, b

ut, n

otw

ithstan

din

g

the effo

rt to p

rint clearly

, his o

ccupatio

n is g

iven

as "P

HO

TO

GR

AP

ER

." It is interestin

g to

contrast th

e han

d p

rintin

g o

n th

is card w

ith th

e more careless en

tries on th

e library

card, Item

(h)—

where h

e giv

es his o

ccu-

pitio

n as "M

echin

ic." Missp

elling o

f occu

patio

nal n

ames

by O

swald

is not less stran

ge th

an m

utilatio

n o

f his

signature, mentioned in Item

(i). (h)

Applic

atio

n fo

r a lib

rary

card

of th

e N

ew

Orle

ans

Public L

ibrary, No. 8640, show

ing the hand printed name

"Osw

ald, L

ee H." an

d th

e signatu

re of th

e same n

ame,

with

certain o

ther h

and p

rintin

g b

etween

these tw

o,

but n

ot in

cludin

g an

y o

f the o

ther w

riting o

n th

e card.

(i) S

ignatures as endorsements on salary checks issued from

O

ctober, 1

962 to

March

1963, in

clusiv

e. Som

e of th

ese sig

natu

res hav

e a norm

al legib

ility fo

r Lee II. O

swald

an

d so

me few

show

an effect o

f mutilatio

n. M

ost p

eople

write sig

natu

res with

prid

e, aimin

g eith

er at legib

ility

or d

istinctiv

eness, an

d so

metim

es for a b

alance o

f the

two. T

his is n

ot tru

e of O

swald

, but in

sofar as a w

riting

may

be said

to co

nvey

an em

otio

n, as m

ight a g

esture,

som

e of th

ese signatu

res seem to

be w

ritten in

anger.

(j) A

chan

ge o

f address card

dated

May

1, 1

963, b

earing

identification data across the lower line w

hich apparently co

nnects it w

ith th

e applicatio

n fo

r review

of d

ischarg

e.

276 S

illy 1966 V

ol. II • No. 3

277

JOU

RN

AL

Or F

OR

EN

SIC

SC

IEN

CE

S

This card

signed

by L

ee IL O

swald bears a considerable

quan

tity o

f han

d p

rintin

g, w

hich

mak

es it valu

able fo

r co

mpariso

n w

ith certain

oth

er cards th

at bear th

e critical ad

dress "P

. 0. B

ox 2

915" an

d w

ith still an

oth

er card th

at bears th

e nam

e "A. J. H

idell" as a p

erson au

thorized

to

receive m

ail in th

e box assig

ned

to L

ee H. O

swald

. It is rare th

at a docu

men

t pro

blem

is accompanied by such

exten

sive an

d v

aried stan

dard

s for co

mpariso

n, em

bracin

g,

as they

do, d

ocu

men

ts mad

e upon d

ifferent o

ccasions fo

r dif-

ferent p

urp

oses, w

ith cu

rsive w

riting as w

ell as han

d p

rintin

g,

careful w

riting an

d careless, co

exten

sive in

time w

ith th

e questio

ned

material, an

d all h

avin

g an

intern

al consisten

cy, th

at is, clearly

iden

tifiable as th

e act of th

e same p

erson so

that th

e w

hole b

ody o

f the stan

dard

writin

g an

d ev

ery d

etail of it is

availab

le for co

mpariso

n w

ith th

e questio

ned

material. T

hese

standard

s giv

e a nearly

ideal o

pportu

nity

for stu

dyin

g th

e w

riting o

f Lee H

arvey

Osw

ald in

prep

aration fo

r com

pariso

n

with

questio

ned

writin

gs. T

hey

contain

a detailed

record

of

his w

riting h

abit, w

hich

is fully

sufficien

t as a basis fo

r iden

tifi-catio

n o

r differen

tiation o

f oth

er han

dw

ritng an

d h

and p

rintin

g.

The q

uestio

ned

docu

men

ts are those related

to p

urch

ase and

ilelivery

of th

e assassinatio

n w

eapons, to

establish

men

t of th

e alias "M

el< JaM

es Hid

ell" or "A

. J. Hid

ell," and u

se of th

e ad

dress "P

. 0. B

ox 2

015, D

allas, Tex

as." The p

rincip

al ques-

tioned documents are as follow

s:

(1) U

nited

States P

ostal M

oney

Ord

er, dated

Dallas, T

exas,

March

12, 1

963, in

the am

ount o

f $21.4

5, m

ade o

ut to

"K

lein's S

portin

g G

oods," th

e purch

aser's nam

e bein

g

giv

en a

s "A. H

idell" (3

). This is in

paym

ent fo

r the

carbine with telescopic sight.

(2) M

icrofilm

copy o

f an en

velo

pe ad

dressed

to K

lein's. . . .

Chicag

o, III., w

ith m

icrofilm

repro

ductio

n o

f the co

upon

ord

er for an

article now

know

n to

be th

e assassinatio

n

weap

on, sp

ecifyin

g d

elivery

to "A

. Hid

ell, P.

0. B

ox

2915, Dallas, T

exas (4).

(3) C

oupon order form of S

eaport Traders, Inc., L

os Angeles,

Califo

rnia, fo

r "1 .3

8 S

t. W. 2

" Bbl" (rev

olv

er) at a cost

of $

29.9

5, ag

ain callin

g fo

r deliv

ery to

"A. J. H

idell,

P. 0

. Box 2

915, D

allas, Tex

as" (5). T

he acq

uirem

ent o

f

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

—F

OR

GE

D D

OC

UM

EN

TS

a firearm m

ust b

e regard

ed as a serio

us an

d d

eliberate

act, y

et it is stra

nge th

at th

e w

riting o

n th

is ord

er

form appears to be below

the ordinary skill of the author. W

e hav

e heard

of p

ersons w

ho ex

press th

emselv

es in a

man

ner calcu

lated to

obscu

re understan

din

g, an

d it m

ay

well b

e asked

why a p

erson sh

ould

pro

duce h

andw

riting

with

less than

the b

est legib

ility o

f which

he is cap

able

in th

is particu

lar situatio

n, esp

ecially in

view

of th

e circu

mstan

ces that h

e has sh

ow

n th

e seriousn

ess of h

is in

tent b

y en

closin

g a su

m o

f money

with

the o

rder.

Anoth

er way

to p

ut th

is questio

n is th

is: Why is n

ot

the o

rder fo

r the rev

olv

er at least as legib

le as the h

and-

prin

ting o

n th

e mem

bersh

ip card

for A

merican

Civ

il L

iberties Union, Item

(g) above? C

han

ge o

f address card

, dated

May

12, 1

963, sig

ned

L

ee H. O

swald

, giv

ing a n

ew ad

dress in

New

Orlean

s, L

ouisian

a, and sh

ow

ing th

e old

address as P

. 0.

Box

2915 (6

). A

pplicatio

n fo

r a post o

ffice box, d

ated N

ew O

rleans,

June 1

1, 1

963, sh

ow

ing th

e nam

e of A

. J. Hid

ell (and

Marin

a Osw

ald) as au

thorized

to receiv

e mail in

the b

ox

assigned to the person who signs as "L

. H. O

swald" (7

). In

ternatio

nal C

ertificate of V

accinatio

n, d

ated Ju

ne 3

, 1963, sig

ned

in th

e nam

e of L

ee H. O

swald

, and b

earing

a sig

natu

re p

urp

orte

d to

be th

at o

f Dr. A

. J. Hid

ed,

which

spellin

g is rep

eated in

the stam

ped

impressio

n

belo

w th

e signatu

re (8). T

he d

esigns o

f letters in th

is im

pre

ssion a

re c

lose

ly sim

ilar to

those

in a

certa

in

rubber stam

pin

g k

it found am

ong O

swald

's effects after his arrest. T

he sig

natu

re in th

e nam

e of L

ee II. Osw

ald

on th

is certificate is disto

rted as b

y ex

treme sp

eed, y

et it is id

entifiab

le as the sig

natu

re of O

swald

, and a p

art of th

e similarity

in th

e nam

e A. J. H

ided

to th

e writin

g

of O

swald

is its similarity

to th

e signatu

re in th

e latter nam

e on this document.

(7) Selective S

ervice System

Notice of C

lassification (photo-grap

hic co

unterfeit), p

urp

ortin

g to

hav

e been

issued

to

Alek

James H

idell, sig

ned

in th

at nam

e, but b

earing a

photograph of Lee H

arvey Osw

ald (9).

278 July 1956

V01. 1

1 • N

u. 3

279

I

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

—F

OR

GE

D D

OC

UM

EN

TS

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

(3) H

andw

ritten letter, sin

gle p

age, to

Leslie W

eldin

g C

o.,

Fort W

orth

, Tex

as, signed

Lee H

. Osw

ald, an

d sh

ow

ing

the ad

dress as B

ox 2

915, D

allas, Tex

as. (This letter h

as been

classified "Q

uestio

ned

" as a part o

f the m

ethod o

f ex

amin

ation rev

iewed

in th

is pap

er, becau

se it inclu

des

an item

that w

as to b

e pro

ved

, nam

ely "B

ox 2

915 D

allas, T

exas," w

hich

stands ap

art from

the b

ody. T

he letter

could

as well b

e placed

with

the stan

dard

s as it is fully

consistent w

ith them.)

These eig

ht d

ocu

men

ts contain

enough q

uestio

ned

writin

g,

cursive and hand printed, to include a good record of the writing

hab

it of th

e auth

or. T

he w

riting is n

atural fo

r the m

ost p

art but som

e elements appear to have been affected by an excess of

care, whereas o

ther p

arts show

more th

an av

erage carelessn

ess, or d

eliberate d

istortio

n. It d

oes n

ot ap

pear, h

ow

ever, th

at any

modificatio

ns in

these q

uestio

ned

writin

gs w

ere for p

urp

oses

of d

isguise b

ut o

nly

that d

ifferent lev

els of care o

r carelessness

were characteristic of the w

riter. T

he fo

rmal co

nditio

ns fo

r com

pariso

n o

f han

dw

riting h

ave

now been established; nam

ely, the presence of a body of standard w

riting ju

dged

to b

e indiv

idual an

d d

istinctiv

e, and g

ivin

g a

detailed record of writing habit, and, on the other side, questioned

writing also judged to be the product of habit w

hich is extensive enough to show

an identifiable pattern. H

andw

riting is id

entified

by th

e presen

ce of a co

mbin

ation

of p

ersonal w

riting h

abits in

the stan

dard

and q

uestio

ned

speci-

men

s bey

ond an

y reaso

nab

le possib

ility o

f coin

ciden

ce, in th

e ab

sence o

f any sig

nifican

t differen

ces, and ab

sence o

f evid

ence

of fo

rgery

as by tracin

g, d

rawin

g, sk

etchin

g in

the q

uestio

ned

sp

ecimen

which

could

giv

e superficial ap

pearan

ce of sim

ilarity.

The n

um

ber o

f poin

ts of sim

ilarity an

d th

e weig

ht assig

ned

to

them

are necessarily

matters o

f judgm

ent b

y an

experien

ced

docu

men

t exam

iner, b

ut th

ese are by n

o m

eans arb

itrary ju

dg-

men

ts since th

eir reliability

can o

nly

he estab

lished

by h

avin

g

mad

e a large n

um

ber• o

f exam

inatio

ns in

cases com

parab

le to

the o

ne en

der im

med

iate study, w

ith in

dep

enden

t tests of th

eir co

rrectness, so

that each

new

com

pariso

n is referab

le to a

body of experience in dealing with com

parable cases. T

he p

roced

ure o

f com

pariso

n after th

oro

ugh stu

dy o

f the

standard

s, is to tak

e up each

item o

f questio

ned

writin

g an

d

to co

mpare it w

ith th

e entire b

ody o

f the stan

dard

writin

g w

ith

particu

lar attentio

n to

indiv

idual letters an

d elem

ents o

f letters, com

binations of letters, connections, approach strokes, terminal

strokes, p

roportio

ns, m

ovem

ent, alig

nm

ent, sp

acing, an

d o

ther

details w

herein

hab

it is revealed

. Of co

urse, th

e most u

seful

areas for co

mpariso

n are th

ose w

here q

uestio

ned

and stan

dard

m

aterial repeat th

e same w

ord

, letter, or co

mbin

ation o

f letters, but th

is does n

ot m

ean th

at any o

ther p

arts are neg

lected. It

is self-evid

ent, h

ow

ever, th

at a hab

it in th

e standard

s related

to a w

ord

, say th

e nam

e "Tex

as", is best co

mpared

with

repeti-

tion o

f the n

ame "T

exas" if it ap

pears in

the q

uestio

ned

ma-

terial, but th

e five letters o

f this n

ame are stu

died

wherev

er they appear in these w

ritings. T

he comparison of standard or know

n writings of L

ee Harvey

Osw

ald w

ith th

e questio

ned

writin

gs th

at show

purch

ase and

delivery of the assassination weapons and use of an alias reveals

a com

plete ag

reemen

t in all sig

nifican

t details o

f writin

g h

abit,

which

agreem

ent is fu

lly su

fficient in

num

ber o

f poin

ts and

the w

eight th

at can b

e assigned

to th

ese. poin

ts to w

arrant th

e belief th

at Lee H

arvey

Osw

ald is th

e auth

or o

f all of th

e ques-

tioned

writin

g. T

here is n

o sig

nifican

t differen

ce and n

o ev

i-den

ce in th

e questio

ned

writin

g to

suggest sim

ulatio

n o

f the

appearan

ce of O

swald

's writin

g b

y so

me o

ther p

erson. T

he

natu

re of th

e agreem

ent b

etween

the stan

dard

writin

g an

d th

e questio

ned

writin

g is ab

out th

e same as th

at betw

een d

ifferent

items o

f the stan

dard

writin

g, w

hich

is a fair test of th

e cor-

respondence that may be expected w

ithin different specimens of

the writing of the sam

e person. T

he p

rocess o

f com

pariso

n can

abso

rb m

any h

ours o

f time

but w

hen

it is perfo

rmed

with

the v

iew o

f a possib

le need

to

repeat th

e pro

cess in circu

mstan

ces that req

uire lim

iting th

e tim

e for p

resentin

g th

e results o

f com

pariso

n to

anoth

er perso

n,

then

the b

ody o

f standard

writin

g is search

ed fo

r typical o

r ch

aracteristic samples th

at can b

e bro

ught to

gen

kc w

ithin

a sm

all space in

the fo

rm o

f excerp

ts from

photo

grap

hic co

pies.

This procedure som

etimes involves the m

ounting of questioned an

d stan

dard

specim

ens o

n a sin

gle ch

art so th

at com

pariso

n

can b

e mad

e with

the sm

allest amount o

f eye m

ovem

ent. A

m

odificatio

n o

f this m

ethod w

as necessary

in d

ealing w

ith

the several questioned specimens and the large body of standard

2$0 buy 1

9G

6

Vol. 11 • N

o. 3 231.

STA

ND

AR

D W

RITIN

G

(A.

- setisss,

e-44r

--e--115*-z-i es./7

2 ,

of

4 .2

1"-;••••••• ■ V

t.c"7

.4

r

70, .eirt:r •

49 .11-4

, , •

to 0

4.4

4./3

41

.'1.9

S

i.

, • “

,

15 44

4,•

••

■•••

t• •

•••11

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T—

FO

RG

ED

DO

CU

ME

NT

S

writin

g sin

ce a

fair sa

mp

le o

f the la

tter w

ou

ld still ta

ke a

considerable am

ount of space and make it inconvenient to anchor

any

on

e qu

estion

ed sp

ecimen

to a sin

gle ch

art. Th

e meth

od

selected

for sh

orten

ing th

e pro

cess of co

mpariso

n w

as to p

re-p

are three ch

arts of stan

dard

writin

g, tw

o sh

ow

ing

cursiv

e w

riting

, and

on

e of h

and

prin

ling

, of su

ch m

od

erate size that

all three co

uld

be laid

befo

re an in

div

idu

al view

er wh

o m

igh

t th

en tak

e up

each q

uestio

ned

specim

en an

d m

ov

e it ov

er each

chart w

hile g

ivin

g atten

tion to

the m

ost co

nven

ient areas fo

r co

mp

arison

. Ch

arts A, B

, and

C rep

resent a sam

plin

g fro

m th

e larg

e bod

y o

f standard

writin

g o

f Lee H

arvey

Osw

ald. T

he

black

bord

ered in

set on each

chart sh

ow

s questio

ned

writin

g

and su

ggests th

e movem

ent o

f this sp

ecimen

, which

is the

writin

g o

n th

e postal m

oney

ord

er to K

lein's, alo

ng each

line

of each

chart fo

r app

rop

riate com

pariso

ns w

here letters an

d

com

bin

ations o

f letters, and elem

ents o

f letters are repeated

w

ithin the questioned and standard specimens.

Each

chart o

ffers several d

ifferent elem

ents fo

r com

pariso

n.

Fo

r ex

am

ple

s: On

Ch

art A

, line 2

, in th

e w

ord

"sup

po

rt" co

nsid

er the last fo

ur letters. T

hen

direct y

our atten

tion to

th

e word

"port" o

n lin

e 3, an

d to

the sam

e com

bin

ation o

f letters in

the w

ord

"transp

ortatio

n" o

f Iine 4

. You w

ill ob-

serve an

hab

itual p

attern in

the fo

rmatio

n o

f these letters w

hich

is clo

sely sim

ilar to th

ose in

the w

ord

"Sportin

g" o

f the q

ses-H

on

ed w

riting

of th

e inset ju

st belo

w lin

e 4. S

pecifically

the

details o

f agreem

ent are—

and

this d

escriptio

n ap

plies to

bo

th

qu

estion

ed an

d stan

dard

specim

ens—

the letter "p

" is mad

e w

itho

ut an

up

per ex

tensio

n b

ut h

as a sho

rt, retraced lo

wer ex

-ten

sion in

stead o

f a loop. T

he b

ody o

f the letter (th

at part o

n

the w

riting lin

e) is angular in

form

and o

pen

at the b

ase, not

closed

again

st the staff as in

the co

nv

entio

nal letter. T

he o

val

form

of th

e "o" is d

etermin

ed alm

ost en

tirely 1)y

curv

ature o

f th

e up

strok

e on

the rig

ht sid

e of th

e letter, with

the left sid

e alm

ost straig

ht. T

he co

nn

ection

betw

een "o

" and

"r" is blen

ded

w

ith th

ese two

letters and

has an

almo

st exactly

ho

rizon

tal asp

ect, with

no in

dicatio

n o

f any ten

den

cy to

return

to th

e w

riting lin

e. There is a sh

arply

angular co

nnectio

n b

etween

the

base o

f the "r" an

d u

p stro

ke o

f the "L

" In th

e exam

ples o

f th

e lover "L

" on lin

es 2 an

d 3

the cro

ssbar is p

laced q

uite

low as it is in the questioned specim

en.

Ch

art A: T

he in

set (black

back

gro

un

d) sh

ow

s qu

estion

ed w

riting

on

th

e postal m

oney order in payment for the carbine w

ith telescopic sight shipped to

the ad

dress sh

ow

n. A

ll oth

er wriV

ng

is from

do

cum

ents su

bm

itted as

bearin

g th

e stand

ard o

r kn

ow

n h

and

writin

g o

f Lee H

arvey

Osw

ald.

Chart B

of stan

dard

writin

g sh

ow

s the in

set of q

uestio

ned

w

riting o

pposite lin

e 3 an

d ju

st belo

w lin

e 10. T

his ch

art has

two ex

amples o

f the w

riting o

f the ad

dress "P

. 0. B

ox 2

915,"

282 Ju

ly M

G

Vo

l. 11

• Isle. 3

283

g.]

,-;."1„.-2.-<;47.' •

2 it (.2

- •

". 4

)

f •

• r" /

,;;;"r^...., 2 r

• • e

rte. •I•it...7•!..;

/3.7.a.• T

O •

• • •

•--9.t.ele

w---4

-?` ,%

e,.

am-

, ..: r,= .9,0., --2 ,,, /,„) ___ I ,

L. 1...../.__,_

4 -4

11

a+'4,

To ..5.13%

./,`. rev ,

■•--fv -e.c.,....4=

od

e 2

_..C

70

6 p

c•--1 c-47-5

0.°

T)-1

ek,

Cr2

.4,-/

to Z

.

77

WR

ITING

9 -

"1-

.,■?

)i

/ I

• • 'ilj17/

7aU

,4;-; • •

STANDARD

c' L

Ek

0,5

to /.

44,1 !Yr&

t 3

7.3

P

1 29

03 P,e

" edr5

0647

toc,rrh. rf.X

9:4

STAN

DA

RD

WR

ITING

Ag4. 4

441 r

171101111./.

1..t

t r

. 51,41...1.1,2,

O. N3

eie

s (5.L tilt. ta

i-1, a

10 S

till

FT

M94'7

{1 ,Te.fd

5

6 .4

. 11 in

.., PIM

N

O.C

1104C

"...1

40.1

".r

.■

y3.:3 .4.141.9.7" ,":14,,r -.D. lia

, ...._10,r g

oo II

2 tn

./We /s

r r

762

41eza 9

X/ e

71.,v„L

,5 s r

/y.

0<

444 1

,7

;#14

3- Al6

▪ fr°

f4ss.1-i-7).,-,, ,(3__

, Awl ,r) Iic-hAR c-e. 7 c77

,r_ ,.3

4c' ••

a . -.4-4:4

4. 05/_46:0

05,50

0N

Re vc : Pi,,,,_ e._ (' 3 ::::. !

f

.,_.•21:_t4,7

:w.ftfr.

_..z37,iti.dc_

_ sp

.:y:7

7e '

•Wisoi

7:42A-Z:fif i _.t.,/,s••-•

./!e..e

.ex „le

er/

OF

41:o

r—Z

.L_T

ke___c..e

.v.-5

Jo

t 4-e

-

-79 .0 9

, e •••=

tht-

4417:40AP

Ag

: 9

fil.4

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

:hart 13: Again the inset show

s questioned writing, w

hich is the same as

hat o

f Chart A

, but sh

ow

n h

ere with

a variety

of ad

ditio

nal stan

dard

w

riting. vhich

are items 1

and 9

of th

e chart, an

d th

ese show

a dose

iniilarity

to th

e same ad

dress o

f the q

uestio

ned

specim

en. A

lo

teworth

y featu

re of th

e figure "5

" is the lo

ng cap

stroke in

tern

1 as co

mpared

with

the "5

" of th

e inset o

f questio

ned

iritin

g. T

his ch

art has tw

o ex

amples o

f the w

ord

"Tex

as" C

lirSINT w

riting o

n lin

es 4 an

d 1

3. H

ere again

there is an

xact ag

reemen

t with

the w

ord

"Tex

as" of th

e questio

ned

writ-

84

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

—F

OR

GE

D D

OC

UM

EN

TS

Chart C

: This chart show

s hand printing and numerals from

the standard w

riting o

f Osw

ald fo

r com

pariso

n w

ith relev

ant p

arts of th

e questio

ned

w

riting shown by the inset. T

his method of illustration provided for m

ove-m

ent of each item of questioned w

riting over the three charts of standard w

riting with a stop for close com

parison at any point. in

g. O

f particu

lar interest is th

e meth

od o

f mak

ing th

e letter "x

." For p

roper stu

dy a m

icrosco

pe is req

uired

whereu

pon it

would

be fo

und th

at the h

otly

of th

e letter, exclu

sive o

f the

crossb

ar, is mad

e in th

e form

of a sm

all letter "u" w

ith th

e seco

nd cu

sp p

laced so

mew

hat h

igher th

an th

e first. it is as

July 1966 V

ol. 11 • No. 3

285

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T—

FO

RC

ED

DO

CU

ME

NT

S

though the writer believed he m

ight form the "x" as a continuous

movem

ent w

ithout th

e need

for a sep

arate bar, b

ut sin

ce it d

evelo

ps in

the fo

rm o

f a letter "u" th

en th

e final stro

ke is

add

ed d

irectly acro

ss the seco

nd

cusp

. Th

is is a hig

hly

un

usu

al m

ethod o

f form

ing th

e letter "x" an

d it is th

e same in

both

standard and questioned w

riting. C

hart C

show

s standard

han

d p

rintin

g_ T

he in

sert of q

ues-

tion

ed w

riting

is at line 4

with

the ad

dress "P

. 0. B

ox

29

15

" in

a fo

rm o

f han

d p

rintin

g, a

nd

a p

rinte

d "A

" on

the lin

e

just ab

ove. H

ere again

, a micro

scope is req

uired

to see th

e p

recise con

structio

n o

f this "A

" wh

ich b

egin

s with

a do

wn

-stro

ke o

n th

e left side th

at is almost ex

actly retraced

by th

e fo

llow

ing arch

ed u

pstro

ke, w

ith th

e crossb

ar confin

ed w

ithin

th

e b

ody o

f the le

tter. T

his d

esc

riptio

n o

f the "A

" is true

for b

oth

qu

estion

ed an

d stan

dard

letters. Th

ese elemen

ts of

the "A

" can b

e seen b

est in th

e standard

writin

g in

Item 6

in

the a

bb

rev

iatio

n "L

A." C

hart C

has th

ree w

riting

s of

"P. 0

. Bo

x," in

Item

4 (rig

ht sid

e o

f ch

art), a

nd

in Ite

ms

6 an

d 7

. Wh

ile these stan

dard

elemen

ts occu

r in a co

ntex

t of

hand

prin

ting th

ey

agre

e e

xactly

with

the sa

me te

xt in

the

questio

ned

writin

g w

hich

is associated

with

cursiv

e writin

g.

An esp

ecially clo

se com

pariso

n is b

etween

line 7

and th

e inset

of q

uestio

ned

writin

g sh

ow

ing "P

. 0. B

ox". A

notew

orth

y

featu

re is th

at o

f clo

sing

the le

tter "0

" ab

ou

t on

e th

ird o

f th

e way

dow

n o

n th

e left side b

y m

eans o

f a stroke th

at moves

to th

e left across th

e top o

f the letter an

d th

en d

ow

nw

ard.

There are m

any o

ther sim

ilarities of th

is ord

er betw

een

the q

uestio

ned

writin

g an

d th

e whole b

ody o

f the stan

dard

w

riting

. It will h

ave b

een ap

preciated

from

this d

escriptio

n

which

has co

vered

only

a few letters th

at a consid

erable am

ount

of tim

e is yeq

uired

to lo

cate and stu

dy in

detail each

stroke o

f each

letter. Ev

en th

en th

e com

pariso

n w

ou

ld n

ot b

e com

plete

until th

ere has o

ccurred

a dilig

ent search

for an

y d

ifference

that m

ight h

ave to

be classified

as one o

f writin

g h

abit to

raise th

e questio

n o

f possib

le auth

orsh

ip b

y an

oth

er perso

n. T

his

search fo

r differen

ces ord

inarily

run

s parallel w

ith th

e stud

y o

f sim

ilarity, b

ut is also

subject to

a separate rev

iew c. am

inatio

n.

This search has not revealed any significant differences betw

een th

e q

uestio

ned

an

d sta

nd

ard

specim

en

s oth

er th

an

tho

se

charg

eable to

norm

al variatio

ns, an

d th

ere are none th

at re-

quire classificatio

n as p

art of a p

attern o

f writin

g h

abit o

f so

me o

ther p

erson. In

stead, th

ere is a perv

asive sim

ilarity in

all sig

nifican

t details b

etween

the stan

dard

writin

g an

d all

of th

e do

cum

ents related

to th

e pu

rchase an

d d

elivery

of th

e m

urd

er weap

ons an

d related

to u

se of an

alias which

similarity

is en

ough to

warran

t the firm

belief th

at all of th

is writin

g is

in the hand of Lee H

arvey Osw

ald.

Sum

mary and C

onclusions H

andw

riting is p

roduced

by th

e operatio

n o

f hab

it. The

pro

cess of learn

ing to

write m

eans th

e acquirem

ent an

d d

e-v

elop

men

t of a set o

f hab

its wh

ich m

akes th

e pro

du

ction

of

han

dw

riting

efficient. It m

ay b

e said th

at hab

it is that w

hich

m

akes h

andw

riting p

ossib

le. Assu

min

g an

opportu

nity

to ex

-am

ine larg

e samples o

f han

dw

riting w

herein

indiv

iduals h

ave

a free op

po

rtun

ity to

record

all or a su

bstan

tial po

rtion

of

perso

nal w

riting h

abit, th

e possib

ility o

f findin

g ex

tensiv

e co

incid

ence is ex

tremely

remo

te. Wh

ile every

literate perso

n

has a n

atural ab

ility in

recognizin

g in

div

iduality

in h

and-

.. writin

g, th

e foren

sic iden

tification o

f han

dw

riting is p

roperly

a sp

ecialty, in

volv

ing a fo

rmal resp

onsib

ility fo

r mak

ing su

ch

judgments subject to rigorous tests of correctness over a substan-

tial period of time so that each new

problem is referable to a body

of ex

perien

ce with

similar p

roblem

s. The statem

ent b

y a

docu

men

t exam

iner th

at two h

andw

ritings, o

ne o

f know

n

auth

orsh

ip an

d th

e oth

er hav

ing b

een o

f unknow

n au

thorsh

ip

are in th

e han

d o

f the sam

e perso

n m

eans

(1)

that sim

ilar ju

dgm

ents h

ave b

een m

ade in

com

parab

le cases, so th

at each

such

prev

iou

s instan

ce giv

es statistical sup

po

rt to th

e curren

t judgm

ent, and (2) th

at he stan

ds read

y to

dem

on

strate a sub

-stan

tial part o

f the reaso

ns fo

r his co

nclu

sion. O

ther co

nditio

ns

for su

ch a ju

dgm

ent are ad

equate stan

dard

s and a q

uestio

ned

sp

ecimen

of su

fficient sco

pe to

giv

e full o

pp

ortu

nity

for re-

cord

ing w

riting H

abit. T

he d

ocu

men

ts related to

the tv

sassina-

tion

of P

residen

t Joh

n F

. Ken

ned

y are u

nu

sual in

the larg

e quan

tity an

d v

ariety o

f standard

and q

uestio

ned

writin

gs. T

heir

detailed

similarity

warran

ts the b

elief that all o

f the stan

dard

an

d q

uestio

ned

han

dw

riting is b

y L

ee Harv

ey O

swald

. Bey

ond

the id

eal ficaticm th

us sh

ow

n, th

e docu

men

ts give inform

ation

286 Ju

ly 1966 V

ol. t r • N

o. 3

2

87

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

about th

e temperam

ent, p

roblem

s, and m

ovem

ents o

f their

auth

or, an

d th

ey p

oin

t to th

e need

for early

detectio

n o

f forg

ed

and co

unterfeit d

ocu

men

ts to fo

restall more serio

us crim

e.

RE

FE

RE

NC

ES

1. R

eport of the President's C

onunission on the Assassination of P

resident John F

. Kennedy, U

nited States G

overnment P

rinting Office, W

ashing-ton, D

. C., 1964, pp. 119, 569.

2. Ibid., pp. 259, 264, 392.

3. Ibid., pp. 119, 120, 567, 569.

Ibid., pp. 119, 120, 567, 569. 5. Ibid., pp. 121, 567, 570. G.

Ibid., pp. 121, 567, 570. 7. Ibid., pp. 121, 567, 570.

8. Ibid., pp. 121, 122, 577.

9. Ibid., pp. 121, 571, 674.

2730 Blaine D

rive C

hevy Chase, M

aryland 20015

Psychiatric O

bservations on the W

arren Com

mission R

eport

Maier I. T

uchler, M.D

.**

This p

sych

iatric study o

f the W

arren C

om

missio

n R

eport (1

) w

ill presen

t, initially

, an o

verall v

iew o

f the rep

ort an

d th

en

undertak

e a more d

etailed an

d critical stu

dy o

f the p

ersonality

pro

file of L

ee Harv

ey O

swald

with

particu

lar reference to

m

otivation. T

he W

arren C

om

missio

n R

eport h

as put to

rest irrational

appreh

ensio

n an

d an

xiety

created b

y th

e assassinatio

n o

f our

Presid

ent at a critical tim

e in th

e natio

n's h

istory

. Follo

win

g

the acu

te perio

d o

f mourn

ing, an

d after th

e recovery

from

the

initial sh

ock

of th

e traged

y, ru

mors o

f consp

iratorial in

volv

e--m

eat of eith

er• the u

ltra-right o

r the u

ltra-left were ram

pan

t. T

he fin

din

gs p

resented

by th

e Warren

Rep

ort ar•e o

f sufficien

t d

etail to n

egate ru

mo

rs of co

nsp

iracy. E

vid

ence is su

fficient

to p

oin

t to O

swald

as a lone assassin

. The h

istory

of th

e rifle w

hich

killed

Presid

ent K

enned

y, th

e ballistics tests su

bseq

uen

t to

the assassin

ation, th

e trajectory

studies w

hich

establish

that

the shots came from

the Texas S

choolbook Depository, the spicule

of glass chipped from the im

ide o

f the w

ind

shield

of th

e presi-

den

tial veh

icle offer co

nvin

cing ev

iden

ce to th

e critical reader.

T:ie co

nclu

sion

wh

ich th

e Warren

Rep

ort estab

lishes is th

e ab

sence o

f either a rig

ht-w

ing o

r a left-win

g co

nsp

iracy, a fact

which

may

be o

f consid

erable sig

nifican

ce in th

e histo

ry o

f the

United

States in

the y

ears to co

me. T

he assassin

ation o

f Presi-

den

t Lin

coln

10

1 y

ears ago

is still the su

bject o

f con

spirato

rial accu

sation an

d th

is subject m

atter has n

ot y

et been

exhau

sted.

• Presented at the E

ighteenth Annual M

eeting of the Am

erican Academ

y of F

orensic Sciences, C

hicago, Illinois, February 21, [666. R

eceived for publication F

ebruary 26, 1966. Accepted for publication Inc

t 3, 1906.

''* Phoenix, A

rizona.

28

5

July 1966 V

at 11

• No

. 3

2M

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T—

PS

YC

HIA

TR

IC O

BS

ER

VA

TIO

NS

The A

merican public m

ay be reassured that the life of our Presi-

den

t was n

ot ex

tinguish

ed b

y d

eliberate p

lan o

f an in

ternal o

r

extern

al gro

up o

f assassins fo

r any racial, p

olitical o

r religio

us

cause. The C

onunission has performed a conscientious, detailed

and often brilliant task. O

nly

an in

div

idual set an

d rig

id in

his b

elief that o

ur so

ciety

is corru

pt w

ill contin

ue to

doubt th

e facts establish

ed b

y th

e

report. C

ertainly

evid

ence is n

ot su

ppressed

and areas o

f con-

troversy

are reported

in d

etail. The C

om

missio

n fo

und n

o ev

i-

den

ce that an

yone assisted

Osw

ald in

plan

nin

g o

r carryin

g o

ut

the assassination. H

erbert L

. Pack

er, pro

fessor o

f law, S

tanfo

rd U

niv

ersity,

reports in

"The N

ation," N

ovem

ber 2

, 1964, "T

he W

arren

Com

missio

n h

as adm

irably

fulfilled

its central o

bjectiv

e of

pro

ducin

g an

account o

f the circu

mstan

ces under w

hich

Presi-

den

t Ken

ned

y w

as assassinated

that is ad

equate to

satisfy all

reasonable doubts about the imm

ediate, essential facts. We now

know as m

uch as we are ever likely to know

about what happened

in D

allas. Why it h

appen

ed rem

ains, p

erhap

s forev

er, obscu

re.

If there. are minor flaw

s in the report—som

e unavoidable, others,

as I shall su

ggest, th

at mig

ht h

ave b

een co

rrected—

they

are

thro

wn in

to sh

adow

by th

e conscien

tious an

d at tim

es brillian

t

job th

at the C

om

missio

n h

as done. O

nly

those fo

r whatev

er

reasons of personal or political myopia cannot bring them

selves

to face reality

\vill co

ntin

ue to

thin

k th

at the trag

edy w

as

pro

xim

ately th

e work

of m

ore th

an o

ne m

an an

d th

erefore

ultimately the outcom

e of a conspiracy" (2).

Professor P

acker is of the opinion that those who w

ould revise

the W

arren R

eport are n

ow

merely

"floggin

g a d

ead h

orse."

It is quite easy to attack the inaccuracies of the statements m

ade

by a d

istrict attorn

ey, statem

ents w

hich

repeated

not o

nly

in-

accuracies b

ut also

susp

icions an

d ru

mor w

hile p

resentin

g th

e

district atto

rney

's case to th

e televisio

n au

dien

ce. The cen

tral

findings of the Com

mission have not been refuted; these findings

are that all th

e wounds su

stained

by b

oth

Presid

ent K

enned

y

and Governor C

onnally were fired 1

) from

above an

d fro

m th

e

rear, 2) th

at these sh

ots w

ere fired fro

nt th

e sixth

floor o

f the

Book D

epository, 3)

that th

e shots w

ere fired fro

m a rifle, a

Man

nlich

er-Carean

o, fo

und o

n th

e Gth

floor o

f the D

eposito

ry,

4) O

swald

was th

e sole o

wner o

f this rifle an

d it w

as purch

ased

through mail-order, and 5

) the sh

ots co

uld

hav

e been

fired b

y

Osw

ald who w

as in the Book D

epository at the time.

None o

f the b

asic facts of th

e Warren

Rep

ort d

epen

ds u

pon

"eyeball" witnesses.

That O

swald

was cap

able o

f firing a g

un at an

oth

er hum

an

whom

he lo

oked

upon as an

enem

y is certain

ly p

robab

le. Al-

though th

e attempt to

kill M

ajor G

eneral W

alker is p

eripheral

to th

e topic u

nder d

iscussio

n, th

ere is a note in

Osw

ald's h

and-

writin

g w

ritten b

efore th

e attempt o

n W

alker's life w

hich

reveals O

swald

's inte

nt; a

nd e

vid

ence su

bsta

ntia

tes th

at

Osw

ald "cased

" Gen

eral Walk

er's hom

e, for p

ictures tak

en b

y

a camera o

wned

by O

swald

were fo

und am

ong h

is posses-

sions (3

). ft is but an

ticlimactic to

report th

at Osw

ald's w

ife

stated th

at Osw

ald to

ld h

er that h

e mad

e an attem

pt o

n th

e

life of G

eneral W

alker. U

ndoubted

ly O

swald

was cap

able o

f

planning and of executing homicide.

What is lack

ing in

the W

arren C

om

missio

n R

eport is a

structu

red stu

dy o

f Osw

ald w

hich

sufficien

tly rev

eals his p

er-

sonality, growth and em

otional development. M

otivation appears

the item

most d

eservin

g o

f study an

d in

vestig

ation. H

ere the

Warren R

eport bogs down into a com

pilation of interviews w

ith

significan

t perso

ns w

hich

, while d

etailed, falls far sh

ort o

f

dev

elopin

g an

y b

ody o

f know

ledge o

n w

hich

the d

ynam

ics of

Osw

ald's p

ersonality

and o

f his m

otiv

ation can

be ad

judged

.

Mr. M

urray

Kem

pto

n, a co

lum

nist fo

r the N

ew Y

ork

World

-

Telegram

, reported in the "New

Republic" of O

ctober 10, 1964

as follo

ws: "W

e are the o

nly

appellate co

urt th

e ghost o

f Lee

Osw

ald w

ill ever k

now

, and so

it beco

mes o

ur d

uty

to cast th

e

cold

est eye w

e can u

pon a v

ersion o

f the life o

f Lee O

swald

and th

e death

of Jo

hn F

. Ken

ned

y th

at has b

een p

roduced

by men w

ho have sifted through the mem

ories of 522 witnesses.

It is no co

nso

lation u

nder th

ese circum

stances to

read, in

the

Warren

Com

missio

n's R

eport, p

age after p

age o

f ratiocin

ation

of th

e source o

f Lee O

swald

's interio

r quarrel, an

d th

en to

look in

the ap

pen

dix

and d

iscover th

at the C

om

missio

n h

ired

for its sta

ff two A

rmy h

istoria

ns a

nd n

o p

sychia

trists. It

heard only two w

itnesses who w

ere psychiatrists, one of whom

saw O

swald

last when

he w

as 13, an

d th

e oth

er of w

hom

saw

only

jack R

uby. T

he C

om

missio

n h

as acted faith

ful to

the

great trad

ition o

f a natio

n o

f perso

ns w

ill practice p

sych

iatry

2o

July 1506 V

ul. 1

1 • N

o. 3

291

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T-P

SY

CH

IAT

RIC

OB

SE

RV

AT

ION

S

with

ou

t a license; w

e then

can g

o fo

rward

with

less sham

e to

practice th

e Co

mm

ission

's pro

fession

with

ou

t a license" (4

). E

xperts in

the fo

rensic scien

ces are experts o

nly

when

they

speak authoritatively in those areas in w

hich they are adequately qualified

. While au

analy

tical chem

ist may

report o

n fin

din

gs

of m

illigram

s percen

t of alco

hol fo

und in

a specim

en o

f blo

od

in h

is labo

ratory

determ

inatio

n, h

e is no

t necessarily

qu

alified

as a student to study the physiology of alcohol or the motivations

which

involv

e an in

div

idual in

the im

bib

ing o

f alcohoL

It may

b

e tragic w

hen

a specialist in

bio

chem

istry testifies in

crim-

inalistics if h

e is no

t info

rmed

in th

is area. It cou

ld b

e equ

ally

tragic if a sp

ecialist in b

allistics were to

testify o

n a sp

ecimen

of h

andw

riting. H

ow

, then

, may

a lawyer assu

me co

mpeten

ce in

the critical area o

f motiv

ation? T

he leg

al min

d is train

ed

to assess fact an

d in

tent. H

is trainin

g an

d p

urp

ose p

repare

him

to d

iscredit ru

mor, sp

eculatio

n, co

njectu

re and m

ost o

f all, m

otivation. A

fter a comprehensive study of the W

arren Report, this w

riter w

as astonish

ed to

learn th

at of th

e 522 w

itnesses in

terview

ed

or deposed and over 25,000 reports presented to the comm

ission, no p

sych

iatrist studied

any d

ata gath

ered b

y th

e form

al and

official so

urces o

r by

the in

vestig

ators an

d atto

rney

s for th

e co

mm

ission. T

he W

arren C

om

missio

n, co

mposed

of a g

roup o

f o

utstan

din

g atto

rney

s, com

peten

tly staffed

with

assistants

trained

in th

e law, ap

peared

to fo

llow

the p

ractice altogeth

er to

o co

mm

on in

the cu

rrent scen

e of p

racticing "lay

" psy

chiatry

. It is w

ell kn

ow

n th

at the law

is interested

in in

tent, p

articularly

in

matters in

vo

lvin

g m

ajor crim

es; ind

eed it is th

is fact that

is the co

rnersto

ne o

n w

hich

the d

octrin

e of m

ens rea is b

ased.

Mo

tivatio

n, th

e stud

y o

f un

con

sciou

s forces, u

po

n w

hich

be-

hav

ior is b

ased is clearly

and

distin

ctly

not th

e concern

of

the law

, for it is b

ased o

n co

njectu

re rather th

an fact, co

ncep

t rath

er than

a kno

wled

ge o

f purp

ose. Y

et it is interestin

g to

note th

at an assistan

t cou

nsel fo

r the W

arren C

om

missio

n, M

r. Jen

ner, h

i dep

osin

g M

r. Kerry

Wen

dell T

ho

rnley

was p

rob

ing

fo

r mo

tivatio

n w

hich

I insist is n

ot w

ithin

the realm

of leg

al co

mpeten

ce although I m

ust ag

ree that in

a modern

crimin

al trial th

e jury

and th

e judge, th

e attorn

eys an

d th

e new

spap

ers are all p

rofo

undly

in search

of an

d d

eeply

affected b

y m

otiv

a-tio

n. T

o q

uo

te Mr. Jen

ner, "W

e are dealin

g in

a very

delicate

field h

ere, and

I am p

ressing

yo

u v

ery sev

erely." M

r. Th

orn

ley,

a one-time M

arine colleague of Lee O

swald, replied, "T

hese are som

etimes very grey thin lines w

e have to distinguish between."

Mr. Jen

ner th

en stated

, "We a

re pro

bin

g fo

r motiva

tion"

(5).

Desp

ite pag

es upon p

ages o

f detailed

info

rmatio

n g

athered

by

com

peten

t police an

d leg

al investig

ators, th

e report is q

uite

deficient in establishing motivation.

Wh

ile readin

g th

e repo

rt in d

etail, the w

riter fou

nd

him

self in

man

y w

ays assu

min

g th

e po

sition

of a ju

ror listen

ing

to

evid

ence. B

allistics data, fin

gerp

rint stu

dies, rep

ort o

f in-

vestig

ators tracid

the g

un

and

the p

istol, an

d d

etails of th

is so

rt are adeq

uately

presen

ted an

d co

nv

incin

g. O

ccasion

ally,

how

ever, d

ata are presen

ted, w

hich

, were th

e investig

ators

perh

aps a b

it mo

re alert to th

e imp

lication

s of th

e con

tent, th

e questio

ns ask

ed o

f Osw

ald m

ight h

ave b

een m

ade m

ore en

-lig

hten

ing an

d in

deed

more rev

ealing. F

or ex

ample, early

in

March

or late in

April 1

963 th

e Osw

alds liv

ed o

n N

eely S

treet in

Dallas in

a little ho

use w

hich

had

a small b

acky

ard. O

n a

Su

nd

ay, acco

rdin

g to

the w

ife, Osw

ald ask

ed h

er to tak

e a p

icture o

f him

ho

ldin

g a p

istol, a rifle, an

d issu

es of tw

o n

ews-

pap

ers, iden

tified later as th

e "Wo

rker" an

d th

e "Militan

t." Tw

o

such

pictu

res were tak

en (6

). Th

ese pictu

res hav

e a particu

lar significance for they clearly reveal O

swald's lack of affiliation in

fact with

either th

e Co

mm

un

ist party

or th

e So

cialist Wo

rkers

party

. Stu

den

ts of th

e political p

arties of th

e left recognize th

at m

embership in the C

omm

unist party and the mem

bership in the S

ocialist W

ork

ers party

are totally

inco

mpatib

le. Osw

ald co

n-

sidered himself a M

arxist but not a Marxist L

eninist, stating that he w

as not a mem

ber and did not believe in the principles of the L

enin

ist party

which

is the C

om

munist p

arty. O

n h

is return

fro

m th

e Soviet U

nio

n h

e carried o

n a lim

ited co

rresponden

ce w

ith th

e So

cialist Wo

rkers p

arty, attem

pted

to jo

in th

at party

, an

d actu

ally su

bscrib

ed to

the "M

ilitant," th

e official p

arty

newspaper of the S

ocialist Workers party.

In A

ugust o

f 1962, th

e Warren

Rep

ort in

detail n

otes th

at O

swald attem

pted to initiate dealings with the C

omm

unist party, U

SA

, by

sub

scribin

g to

the "W

ork

er" and

he co

ntin

ued

son

ic correspondence in connection w

ith his "Fair P

lay for Cuba C

om-

mittee" (7

). He h

ad fo

rmed

this "F

air Play

for C

ub

a Co

m-

mittee" u

nd

er the alias o

f IIidell an

d h

e was th

e sole m

emb

er!

292 July 19136

Vii. i1

• No. 3

293

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T—

PS

YC

HIA

TR

IC O

BS

ER

VA

TIO

NS

In

additio

n, h

e wro

te to th

e Socialist L

abor p

arty id

entify

ing

him

self as a mem

ber o

f the "F

air Play

for C

uba C

om

mittee."

It is importan

t to n

ote th

at neith

er of th

e above-m

entio

ned

gro

ups o

f the left rep

ort an

y activ

e particip

ation o

r mem

bersh

ip

affilia

tion o

f Osw

ald

. Indeed, O

swald

was a

loner, a

nd it

appears th

at he w

anted

more im

med

iate recognitio

n an

d in

stant

acknow

ledgm

ent as a p

olitical lead

er from

an the leftist fro

nts.

Alth

ough h

e claimed

to h

ave m

embersh

ip o

f 35 in

the "F

air P

lay fo

r Cuba C

om

mittee" in

New

Orlean

s, there is ad

equate

evid

ence th

at Osw

ald w

as the o

nly

mem

ber an

d th

at he h

ad an

alias, H

idell, a n

ame so

closely

synonym

ous w

ith F

idel th

at its origin can be readily identified.

The p

hoto

grap

h o

f Osw

ald h

old

ing tw

o n

ewsp

apers w

hich

rep

resent th

e official p

ublicatio

ns o

f political p

arties that are

thoro

ughly

antag

onistic g

ives co

nvin

cing ev

iden

ce of th

e fact th

at Osw

ald lack

ed affiliatio

n w

ith an

y o

f the p

arties on th

e left,. th

at he w

as a loner, an

d th

is confirm

s the facts o

f the

Warren

Rep

ort. A

s a perso

nal o

bserv

ation, I fin

d th

e pictu

res m

ore convincing than reams of print.

Child

hood an

d d

evelo

pm

ent h

istory

of L

ee Harv

ey O

swald

rev

eal that as early

as age tw

o h

e was an

unm

anag

eable ch

ild

usu

ally u

nder th

e care of b

aby sitters w

hile h

is moth

er was

employed. A

t the age of three he was placed in a children's hom

e w

here fo

r a critical 13 m

onth

s he w

as visited

only

occasio

nally

by h

is moth

er. When

anticip

ating rem

arriage, M

rs. Osw

ald

with

drew

Lee fro

m th

e child

ren's h

om

e and h

e lived

with

her

briefly

. After h

er marriag

e to M

r. Ekdah

l, Lee rem

ained

in

her home until his m

other was divorced in 1948.

A rev

iew o

f the h

istory

of L

ee Osw

ald co

nvey

s the d

istinct

impressio

n th

at his h

om

e life was u

tterly u

nstab

le, that h

is fam

ily moved frequently betw

een Fort W

orth, Texas, C

ovington, L

ouisian

a, and b

ack to

Fort W

orth

with

frequen

t moves in

th

e last city n

ecessitating m

any sch

ool tran

sfers while in

mid

-sessio

n. H

is earlier years in

New

Orlean

s were in

deed

hectic.

For several years his older brothers had been placed in boarding

schools. S

tudy o

f the sig

nifican

t early y

ears of L

ee Harv

ey

Oaw

aId rev

eals an essen

tial rejection b

y th

e moth

er and a lack

of id

entificatio

n w

ith a sig

nifican

t adult. T

his p

attern u

sually

leads to delinquent behavior.

The personality of L

ee Osw

ald was characterized during boy-

hood b

y w

ithdraw

al. He p

layed

by h

imself, freq

uen

tly refu

sed

to le

ave h

om

e a

nd, b

y th

e a

ge o

f 10, h

e p

refe

rred to

stay

indoors an

d read

com

ic books an

d listen

to th

e radio

. He w

as described as robust and "m

ean when he w

as angry, just ornery." A

fter a married

old

er bro

ther jo

ined

the C

oast G

uard

and

moved to N

ew Y

ork, Mrs. O

swald took L

ee to visit and remained

for a b

rief perio

d w

ith h

er old

er son. W

hile liv

ing w

ith h

is bro

ther, L

ee, then

aged

13, fo

ught w

ith h

is sister-in-law

by

hold

ing a p

ock

et knife o

n h

er durin

g a q

uarrel, g

ivin

g ev

iden

ce of a rag

e reaction w

hen

frustrated

of co

nsid

erable fu

ture sig

-n ificance.

Once settled

in N

ew Y

ork

, Lee O

swald

's school ad

justm

ent

deterio

rated an

d th

e moth

er transferred

him

from

a Luth

eran

day

school to

a public sch

ool. H

e attended

school ab

out o

ne

day in

four a

nd re

ceiv

ed fa

iling g

rades in

the 7

th g

rade.

Tru

ancy

hearin

gs w

ere held

. Both

Lee an

d h

is moth

er were

absen

t. The reco

rd is rep

lete with

evid

ence th

at the m

oth

er w

as as skilled

in m

anip

ulatin

g h

er enviro

nm

ent as w

as her so

n.

On a series o

f occasio

ns sh

e explain

ed h

is beh

avio

r as "due to

difficu

lty in

adju

sting to

his n

ew en

viro

nm

ent." L

ee was d

e-clared truant and w

as remanded to Y

outh House for psychiatric

study. H

e refused

to ap

pear b

efore th

e presid

ing ju

dge. D

r. R

enatu

s Ha-togs, the only psychiatrist w

ho examined L

ee, who

was th

en ag

ed 1

3, in

dicated

that L

ee was a w

ithdraw

n an

d

socially maladjusted boy w

hose mother w

ould not interest herself su

fficiently

in h

is welfare (8

). His m

oth

er had

failed to

estab-

lish a relatio

nsh

ip w

ith h

er son. M

rs. Osw

ald h

ad co

nsid

ered

Youth

House as u

nfit fo

r her so

n. D

r. Itartogs reco

mm

ended

pro

batio

n fo

r the b

oy w

ith a ch

ild g

uid

ance clin

ic follo

w-u

p

and also

urg

ed th

e moth

er to co

ntact a fam

ily serv

ice agen

cy

for so

cial service assistan

ce. Once th

e boy h

ad b

een p

laced

on p

robatio

n h

e com

pleted

the 7

th g

rade b

ut h

e soon retu

rned

to

his p

revio

us p

attern o

f truan

cy an

d b

y th

e time h

e was in

th

e 8th

grad

e the p

robatio

n o

fficer was o

rdered

by th

e judge

to m

ake a referral to

either an

industrial farm

or a ch

ildren

's villag

e for resid

ential treatm

ent. M

rs. Osw

ald rejected

the

ord

er of th

e judge; it w

as evid

ent fro

m read

ing th

e report th

at M

rs. Osw

ald w

as reluctan

t to co

operate w

ith th

e advice o

f

294 July 1966

Vol. 1

1 • N

o. 3

295

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T—

PS

YC

HIA

TR

IC O

BS

ER

VA

TIO

NS

the c

ourt. F

earfu

l that th

e b

oy m

ight b

e re

tain

ed in

som

e

typ

e of p

rotectiv

e custo

dy, M

rs. Osw

ald to

ok L

ee out o

f the

jurisd

iction o

f the co

urt early

in 1

954 an

d retu

rned

to N

ew

Orleans w

here Lee com

pleted the 8th grade. D

urin

g th

e ensu

ing few

years, L

ee was d

escribed

as dem

and-

ing an

d in

solen

t tow

ard h

is moth

er and sev

eral witn

esses hav

e rep

orted

that th

e mo

ther h

ad little o

r no

con

trol o

ver h

er son

. B

y the fall of 1955, Lee O

swald w

rote a note to which he signed

his m

oth

er's nam

e stating th

at he m

ust q

uit sch

ool b

ecause th

e fam

ily w

as mo

vin

g to

San

Dieg

o. T

his w

as a falseho

od

. After

his six

teenth

birth

day

he tried

to en

list in th

e Marin

es usin

g

a false affidav

it from

his m

oth

er stating

that h

e was sev

enteen

. H

is old

er bro

ther, Jo

hn, h

ad jo

ined

the M

arines u

sing sim

ilar tactics. T

he m

oth

er had

actually

signed

the affid

avits in

both

eases (9

). T

here certain

ly seem

s to b

e som

e iden

tification

betw

een L

ee an

d h

is old

er bro

ther fo

r Lee sp

ent h

is entire six

teenth

year

mem

orizin

g th

e Marin

e Man

ual w

hich

he h

ad receiv

ed fro

m

his b

roth

er. As so

on as h

e was 1

7 y

ears of ag

e he jo

ined

the

Marines. T

he p

attern o

f dev

elopm

ent th

us far rev

ealed in

the ab

ove

sketc

h is n

ot a

t all d

evia

nt fro

m th

at o

f score

s of y

oung

adolescen

ts whose b

ehav

ior can

be co

nsid

ered co

llectively

as d

elinqu

ent. T

he p

attern o

f man

ipu

lation o

f the en

viro

nm

ent

by

the m

oth

er, the free u

tilization

of false affid

avits, w

hich

is m

anip

ulatin

g as w

ell as rejecting, an

d th

e overall p

rotectio

n

of th

e delin

quen

t son b

y ev

asion, co

unter h

ostility

, and m

anip

u-

lation is clearly demonstrable.

That L

ee Harv

ey O

swald

used

rage reactio

ns an

d tem

per

tantru

ms to

gain

his en

ds in

dicates th

e deg

ree of ch

aracter dis? . d

er already p

revalen

t; yet n

oth

ing is rev

ealed w

hich

is dev

iant fro

m th

e case histo

ries of sco

res of y

oung d

elinquen

ts. L

ee Harv

ey O

swald

's beh

avio

r while in

the M

arine C

orp

s was

a contin

uatio

n o

f his b

oyhood p

attern; h

e stayed

to h

imself,

did

no

t play

cards o

r wo

rk o

ut w

ith th

e oth

ers, read a g

oo

d

deal, v

iolated

the u

sual ro

utin

e and

had

to u

nd

ergo

several

cou

rt martials. T

he first co

urt m

artial was in

respo

nse to

an

episo

de in

which

he sto

red a lo

aded

pisto

l in h

is lock

er which

disch

arged

and sen

t a bullet in

to h

is left elbow

. The seco

nd

court martial follow

ed pouring beer on a noncomm

issioned offi-cer an

d cu

rsing h

im w

hile O

swald

was in

toxicated

in a cafe

in Jap

an. H

e was so

difficu

lt in b

arracks d

isciplin

e that o

ther

mem

bers o

f his q

uonset b

ut secu

red h

is transfer to

anoth

er barracks.

Unquestionably he had a pronounced interest in w

orld affairs an

d ap

peared

much

better in

form

ed o

n th

e intern

ational issu

es th

an so

me o

f his o

fficers. He freq

uen

tly b

aited h

is sup

eriors

into conversation in which he could appear the better inform

ed. It w

as obvio

us th

at he h

ad a g

reat desire to

app

ear bo

th in

-telligent and know

ledgeable. Throughout the M

arine Corps stay

he studied Russian and favored the C

astro government in C

uba, a belief that w

as not unpopular in 1959. A

review

of th

e bo

yh

oo

d an

d y

ou

ng

man

ho

od

of L

ee Harv

ey

Osw

ald in

dicates little m

ore th

an rejectio

n, w

ithdraw

al, and a

com

pen

satory

need

for a self-assertiv

e aggressiv

eness in

areas o

f po

lities, religio

n, an

d p

hilo

sop

hy

. Th

ese tend

encies are n

ot

mu

ch d

ifferent th

an th

ose v

iews ex

pressed

by

any

nu

mb

er of

young reb

els to th

e social o

rder. A

much

more d

etailed stu

dy

of m

otiv

ation

is need

ed in

ord

er to d

isting

uish

tho

se par-

ticular qualities in Lee H

arvey Osw

ald which m

ight differentiate him

from the m

ajority of young delinquents. I a

m re

lucta

nt to

t -com

e embro

iled in

those areas w

hich

properly belong to the discussants skilled in the law

. There w

as certainly indication upon reading the W

arren Report, that m

uch of th

e evid

ence p

resented

by th

e investig

ators w

ould

pro

bab

ly

be ch

alleng

ed o

n cro

ss-exam

inatio

n. C

ertainly

the rig

ht o

f O

swald

to assert h

is innocen

ce, to h

ave access to

an atto

rney

, an

d to

be reaso

nab

ly secu

re wh

ile in cu

stod

y are to

pics th

at are m

ore d

eservin

g o

f legal stu

dy th

an p

sych

iatric com

men

t. I am

mo

re con

cerned

with

the p

articular issu

e wh

ich th

e repo

rt p

resum

es to co

ver th

rou

gh

pag

es and

pag

es of ratio

nalizatio

n,

com

men

t and

op

inio

n ex

pressed

on

the p

erson

ality o

f Osw

ald

in th

e absen

ce of stu

dy

and

con

sideratio

n b

y an

y m

edically

or

psy

chiatrically

qualified

staff mem

ber. H

ere, to m

y m

ind, lies

the w

eakness o

f the W

arren R

eport; it is n

ot to

o late to

supple-

men

t the lay

psy

chiatric o

pin

ion

s with

a con

servativ

e pro

fes-sio

nal stu

dy

of th

e sign

ificant relev

ant em

otio

nal facto

rs in th

e gro

wth

of O

swald

. While th

e moth

er is still alive h

e deserv

es

2911 July 1966

[L • N

o. 3

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

a thoro

ugh p

sych

iatric study ; h

is form

er wife, M

arina, sh

ould

certain

ly b

e interv

iewed

to g

ain so

me p

rofessio

nal k

now

ledge

of h

er interp

erson

al relation

ship

with

Osw

ald. A

ny

ind

ivid

ual

of sig

nifican

ce to th

e gro

wth

and d

evelo

pm

ent o

f Osw

ald

thro

ug

ho

ut ch

ildh

oo

d, ad

olescen

ce and

into

man

ho

od

deserv

es inquiry. In this w

ay it would be possible to build up a significant

understan

din

g o

f Osw

ald an

d an

attempt co

uld

be m

ade to

clarify

why h

e com

mitted

the acts as ch

arged

. This w

ould

really be a basic study of personality developm

ent and would be

inclusive of the concept of motivation.

Conclusion P

erhap

s the m

ost sig

nifican

t contrib

utio

n th

e psy

chiatric

pro

fession co

uld

offer to

augm

ent th

e Warren

Rep

ort w

ould

b

e a reassessmen

t of th

e details, facts, an

d in

form

ation

already

g

athered

by

the in

vestig

ators o

f the W

arren C

om

missio

n w

hich

w

ould lead to a better understanding of motivation. If, follow

ing a p

erusal o

f the sig

nifican

t data alread

y g

athered

, areas of

furth

er stud

y seem

necessary

, a reexam

inatio

n o

f tho

se in-

div

iduals sig

nifican

t to th

e gro

wth

and d

evelo

pm

ent o

f Lee

Harvey O

swald w

ould be clearly indicated. Of prim

e importance

would be a study in depth of the m

other. Marina, the w

ife, would

also b

e deserv

ing o

f a much

more carefu

l study in

dep

th. T

he

teachers, fello

w stu

den

ts, Marin

e Co

rps co

ntacts, acq

uain

tances

in th

e Soviet U

nio

n co

uld

all add m

uch

to th

e know

ledge o

f the

personality of Lee H

arvey Osw

ald. A

fter a thoro

ugh rev

iew o

f the W

arren C

om

missio

n R

eport,

I would

urg

e a furth

er study in

dep

th o

f the in

terperso

nal

relationships of Osw

ald and the people of significance in his past histo

ry. O

nly

thro

ugh su

ch stu

dy tan

Osw

ald's m

otiv

ation b

e tru

ly ascertain

ed an

d a b

etter understan

din

g o

f the p

ersonality

of the assassin of the P

resident be gained.

SU

Mm

i ry T

his study involves a review of the W

arren Report and a m

ore detailed

study o

f the u

niq

ue p

ersonality

of L

ee Harv

ey O

swald

. A

ltho

ug

h th

e Warren

Cem

missio

n, a b

od

y o

f ou

tstand

ing

at-to

rney

s, app

eared to

follo

w th

at practice co

mm

on

to a g

rou

p

of intellectuals of functio

nin

g as "lay

" psy

chiatrists, th

is writer

is appalled

at conclu

sions reach

ed w

hich

involv

e psy

chiatric

WA

RR

EN

RE

POR

T—

PSYC

FLT

AT

RIC

OB

SER

VA

TIO

NS

evalu

ation

s and

jud

gm

ents w

itho

ut th

e ben

efit of train

ed pro-

fessional thinking. A

study in

dep

th o

f tho

se ind

ivid

uals sig

nifican

t to th

e emo-

tion

al gro

wth

of L

ee Harv

ey O

swald

is ind

icated in

ord

er to

better understand his motivation.

RE

FE

RE

NC

ES

I. The W

arren Report, A

ssociated Press E

dition, 1964. (This transcript

of the report of The P

resident's Com

mission of the A

ssassination of P

resident John F. K

ennedy was used to prepare this bibliography.)

2.

Packer, H

erbert L. A

Measure of A

chievement. T

he Nation, N

ovem-

ber 2, 1964. 3. T

he Warren R

eport, Associated P

ress Edition, 1964, pp. 250-252, 316.

4. Ibid, pp. iii, 203. 5

. Thornley, K

erry. Osw

ald. New

Classics H

ouse, New

York, 1965, p. 114.

6. T

he Warren R

eport, Associated P

ress Edition, 1964, pp. 50, 175-179,

190, Exhibit 133A

. 7

. Ibid, pp. 122-124, 174, 318-319.

8. Ibid, pp. 162, 29L

9.

Ibid, pp. 165, 293.

4426 North 36th S

treet Phoenix, A

rizona 85018

203 July 19A

V

ol. 11 • Nn. 3

2‘..19

A C

ritique of the Medical A

spects of the

Investigation into the Assassination of

President K

ennedy*

Cyril II. fliecht, iIL

D., L

L.B

.,** Pittsburgh, P

enusylvania

Follo

win

g th

e initial sh

ock

of P

residen

t Ken

ned

y's assassin

a-

tion o

n th

at fateful d

ay o

f Novem

ber 2

2, 1

963, th

e natio

n

addressed

itself to th

e postm

ortem

investig

ation an

d ev

alua-

tion o

f the crim

e. The u

nex

pected

, and at tim

es almost u

n-

believ

able, ev

ents th

at follo

wed

the assassin

ation resu

lted in

much

confu

sion an

d co

ntro

versy

in th

e min

ds o

f law en

force-

men

t officials, atto

rney

s, and fo

rensic scien

tists, not to

men

tion

the lay public. T

o th

oro

ughly

and o

fficially sift th

rough th

e overw

helm

ing

and frequently conflicting pieces oC evidence, P

resident Johnson

appoin

ted a co

mm

ittee of d

istinguish

ed A

merican

s, head

ed b

y

Chief Ju

stice Earl P

. Warren

. The W

arren C

om

missio

n m

et

with

all of th

e prin

cipals, as w

ell as man

y o

f the m

inor p

er-

sonag

es, who h

ad b

een in

volv

ed in

the assassin

ation an

d th

e

even

ts that fo

llow

ed. A

fter man

y m

onth

s of in

terview

s, in-

vestig

ations, an

d ev

aluatio

ns o

f vario

us leg

al, police, m

edical,

and scien

tific reports, th

e Warren

Com

missio

n p

ublish

ed its

findin

gs ( I). It w

as fur th

e purp

ose o

f evalu

ating th

is report

from

the &

•:ndpoin

t of p

eople activ

e and in

terested in

the

applicatio

n o

f the fo

rensic scien

ces to th

e adm

inistratio

n o

f

justice that this symposium

was arranged.

t Presen

ted at th

e Eig

hteen

th A

nnual M

eeting o

f the A

merican

Acad

emy

of F

oren

sic Scien

ces, Chicag

o, Illin

ois, F

ebru

ary 2

4, M

G. R

eceived

for

publicatio

n A

pril 0

, 10(iii. A

ccepted

for p

ublicatio

n Ju

ne 5

, 1066.

" Directo

r, Institu

te of F

oren

sic Scien

ces, Duquesn

e Univ

ersity S

chool

of L

aw, P

ittsburg

h, P

ennsy

lvan

ia. Chief D

eputy

Coro

ner an

d C

hief F

oren

-

sic Path

olo

gist, A

lleghen

y C

ounty

, Pen

nsy

lvan

ia.

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

—C

RIT

IQU

E O

F M

ED

ICA

L A

SP

EC

TS

Each

of u

s undoubted

ly v

iews th

e Presid

ential assassin

ation

and th

e Warren

Com

missio

n R

eport p

rimarily

in th

e light o

f

his own professional practice, know

ledge and experience. Most

of the forensic sciences find areas of significance to discuss and

perh

aps criticize in

this rep

ort, an

d certain

ly th

at would

be

true as far as forensic pathology is concerned.

The trag

ic dem

ise of Jo

hn F

. Ken

ned

y p

oses n

o p

roblem

for u

s in term

s of d

etermin

ing th

e cause and th

e manner of

death. T

hese tw

o q

uestio

ns are th

e prim

ary an

d m

ost im

-

portan

t ones to

be an

swered

by a fo

rensic p

atholo

gist in

evalu

-

ating any d

eath b

y g

unsh

ot w

ound (s). H

ow

ever, h

avin

g an

-

swered

these tw

o q

uestio

ns, th

e foren

sic path

olo

gist m

ust

pro

ceed fu

rther, fo

r he o

ften w

ill be called

upon in

a court o

f

law u

nder o

ath to

offer p

rofessio

nal o

pin

ions o

n co

llateral

matters o

f importan

ce. Ran

ge, n

um

ber o

f bullets fired

, poin

ts

of en

try an

d ex

it, directio

n an

d an

gle o

f fire, "fatality" o

f

each individual wound—

these questions and many m

ore will be

posed

to th

e foren

sic path

olo

gist in

pretrial ev

aluatio

n an

d o

n

direct and cross-examination during the trial.

In th

is particu

lar case, all of u

s, as critics, are han

dicap

ped

by n

ot h

avin

g b

een in

volv

ed in

the au

topsy

. Conseq

uen

tly,

we are lim

ited in

our ev

aluatio

n to

those p

ortio

ns o

f the reco

rd

that h

ave b

een m

ade p

ublic th

rough o

fficial sources. T

he o

nly

oth

er med

ical facts that w

e hav

e are those th

at were released

by th

e physician

s at Park

land M

emorial H

osp

ital in D

allas,

Tex

as, where P

residen

t Ken

ned

y w

as taken

and treated

befo

re

bein

g p

ronounced

dead

officially

. Thus, w

e must p

reface any

remark

s, particu

larly an

y th

at may

seem to

be critical, w

ith th

e

caveat th

at we are n

ot in

possessio

n o

f all the facts. A

lso,

we can

appreciate th

at the p

atholo

gists w

ho p

erform

ed th

e

auto

psy

, bein

g m

embers o

f the A

rmed

Serv

ices, may

not h

ave

been permitted to publicly release all their findings.

There are sev

eral questio

ns th

at must b

e raised b

y a fo

rensic

pathologist in evaluating the autopsy report on John F. K

ennedy.

By stan

dard

s found in

most co

mpeten

t med

ical-legal In

vestig

a-

tive facilities, th

e auto

psy

report w

ould

not b

e deem

ed to

be

a com

plete o

ne. C

ertain essen

tials are missin

g, an

d m

any q

ues-

tions h

ave b

een raised

and h

ave g

one u

nan

swered

, at least

officially

, becau

se of th

e absen

ce of su

ch in

form

ation in

the

300 Ju

ly 1

9G

6

Vol. It • N

o. 3

:301.

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T—

CR

ITIQ

UE

OF

ME

DIC

AL

AS

PE

CT

S

official autopsy report and in the subsequent testimony given be-

fore the Warren C

omm

ission. It is my purpose briefly to discuss

some of the areas of incom

plete information and the unansw

ered questions that have arisen therefrom

. A

t the o

utset, it sh

ould

be stated

that th

is discu

ssion w

ill include com

ments on the various m

edical aspects of the assassina-tion of P

residen

t Ken

ned

y th

at mig

ht n

ot b

e con

sidered

to b

e d

irectly w

ithin

the realm

of fo

rensic p

atho

log

y. H

ow

ever, in

-asm

uch

as there is n

o rep

resentativ

e of clin

ical med

icine in

-clu

ded

in th

is sym

posiu

m I w

ould

be rem

iss if certain o

b-

servatio

ns o

f a gen

eral med

ical natu

re were n

ot m

ade.

Th

e vario

us o

bserv

ation

s hav

ing

to d

o w

ith m

edicin

e and

path

olo

gy co

ntain

ed w

ithin

this p

aper w

ill be d

iscussed

in

chro

no

log

ical fashio

n rath

er than

in o

ther p

ossib

le way

s, such

as d

imin

ishin

g m

edical o

r po

litical imp

ortan

ce, etc. A ch

ron

o-

logical d

iscussio

n w

ould

seem to

be th

e most lo

gical ap

pro

ach

in th

is particu

lar instan

ce.

Bleed T

ype of the President

Th

e first thin

g th

at is no

ted b

y a p

hy

sician in

review

ing

th

e assassinatio

n o

f Presid

ent K

enn

edy

is the fact th

at his

blo

od ty

pe w

as not k

now

n o

r imm

ediately

availab

le to th

e physicians at P

arkland Mem

orial Hospital. C

onsequently, 0, R

h

neg

ative b

lood w

as adm

inistered

(2). It sh

ould

be em

phasized

th

at this lack

of v

ital med

ical info

rmatio

n d

id n

ot p

lay a ro

le in

Presid

ent K

enned

y's d

eath. T

he n

ature an

d ex

tent o

f his

wounds, w

hich

will b

e discu

ssed in

greater d

etail later, were

such

that h

e certainly

would

not h

ave su

rviv

ed n

o m

atter what

therap

eutic m

easures w

ere un

dertak

en. H

ow

ever, g

iven

oth

er circu

mstan

ces, with

wo

un

ds o

f a less grav

e natu

re incu

rred

either b

y accid

ental m

eans o

r thro

ugh an

attempted

assassina-

tion, o

r giv

en a n

aturally

occu

rring d

isease pro

cess which

re-q

uires im

med

iate transfu

sion

of b

loo

d, th

e imp

ortan

ce of k

no

w-

ing the blood type of the President becom

es obvious. O

ne w

onders w

hy su

ch v

ital info

rmatio

n is n

ot read

ily av

ail-ab

le on sm

all . m

edical in

form

ation

and

iden

tification

cards

presen

t at all times w

ith th

e Presid

ent an

d also

with

one o

r m

ore o

f the S

ecret Serv

ice men

who acco

mpan

y th

e Presid

ent

on all trips.

Treatm

ent at Hospital

There can

be n

o criticism

of th

e med

ical and su

rgical treat-

men

t adm

inistered

to th

e Presid

ent at P

arklan

d M

emorial

Ho

spital in

Dallas, T

exas. A

s a matter o

f fact, it is on

ly fair

to in

ject a com

men

t at this p

oin

t with

regard

to a m

edical o

rder

mad

e by D

r. Charles Jam

es Carrico

, a surg

ical residen

t at P

arklan

d M

emo

rial Ho

spital, w

ho

was th

e first ph

ysician

to

undertake treatment of the P

resident when his body w

as brought to

the h

osp

ital. Dr. C

arrico, rem

emb

ering

that so

me co

mm

ent

had

been

mad

e in th

e past reg

ardin

g th

e po

ssibility

that P

resi-d

ent K

enn

edy

had

Ad

diso

n's D

isease, ord

ered 3

00

millig

rams

of hydrocortisone to be administered im

mediately (3).

All o

ther m

easures th

at cou

ld h

ave b

een u

nd

ertaken

were

do

ne so

with

du

e disp

atch, in

clud

ing

the ad

min

istration

of

ox

yg

en, in

traven

ou

s fluid

s and

blo

od

, the u

se of a B

enn

ett R

espirato

r, the p

erform

ance o

f a tracheo

stom

y, an

d ex

ternal

cardiac massage (4).

At th

is poin

t, it is importan

t again

to em

phasize th

e fact th

at the P

residen

t was b

eyo

nd

the p

ossib

ility o

f bein

g sav

ed

- wh

en h

e was b

rou

gh

t to th

e ho

spital. H

is pu

pils w

ere dilated

an

d fix

ed, th

ere was n

o o

btain

able p

ulse o

r blo

od

pressu

re, and

th

ere was o

nly

a faint su

ggestio

n o

f a heartb

eat (5). A

lthough

the P

residen

t was n

ot o

fficially p

ronounced

dead

until ap

pro

xi-

mately

1:0

0 p

. ne, w

hich

was ab

ou

t 25

min

utes after h

e was

bro

ught to

the h

osp

ital and ab

out 3

0 to

40 m

inutes after h

e receiv

ed th

e wo

un

ds, th

is official tim

e of th

e death

pro

no

un

ce-m

ent sh

ou

ld n

ot b

e con

strued

to m

ean th

at the P

residen

t really

was a

live fo

r 40 m

inute

s afte

r receiv

ing th

e fa

tal h

ead

wound (6

). It is necessary to com

ment on one particular surgical m

easure, nam

ely th

e tracheo

stom

y. A

wound w

as noted

in th

e anterio

r asp

ect of th

e neck

at appro

xim

ately th

e level o

f the k

not o

f th

e tie and alm

ost at th

e mid

line. T

he su

rgeo

ns n

oted

the

dam

age to

the trach

ea and so

ft tissues u

nderly

ing th

is skin

w

ou

nd

an

d th

ere

fore

perfo

rmed

the tra

ch

eo

stom

y a

t this

site (7

). Th

is is un

dersta

nd

ab

le, fo

r the p

erfo

rman

ce o

f a

tracheo

stom

y elsew

here w

ould

hav

e mean

t additio

nal d

amag

e to

the trach

ea, with

furth

er com

pro

mise o

f respirato

ry fu

nc-

tion. It also

would

hav

e mean

t that th

e existin

g trach

eal lama-

302 Ju

ly 1

566

Vol. 1

1 • N

o. 3

303

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T—

CR

ITIQ

UE

OF

ME

DIC

AL

AS

PE

CT

S

Lio

n w

ould

hav

e had

to b

e repaired

, thus n

ecessitating an

oth

er surgical procedure.

Thus, w

hile fo

rensic p

atholo

gists freq

uen

tly b

emoan

the fact

that su

rgeo

ns d

estroy

sites of g

un

sho

t and

stab w

ou

nd

s, thereb

y

mak

ing it im

possib

le for th

e foren

sic path

olo

gist su

bseq

uen

tly

to d

etermin

e size, range, en

trance an

d ex

it characteristics, etc.,

it should

be b

orn

e in m

ind th

at the p

rime co

nsid

eration o

f the

surg

eon is to

attempt to

save th

e patien

t's life. Thus, in

those

cases in which it

is more feasible m

edically to make an incision

thro

ugh an

existin

g w

ound o

f the b

ody fo

r a specific su

rgical

reason

, there sh

ou

ld b

e no

criticism o

f the su

rgeo

n fo

r doin

g

so. U

nfo

rtunately

, the p

erform

ance o

f the trach

eosto

my th

rough

.Lis site w

as responsib

le for sev

eral misco

ncep

tions an

d co

n-

troversy

that d

evelo

ped

subseq

uen

tly an

d w

hich

remain

with

us to

day

. This w

ill he co

mm

ented

on later in

this p

aper.

External W

oun

ds

The su

rgeo

ns at P

arklan

d M

emorial H

osp

ital noted

only

two

extern

al wounds. T

hese w

ere the w

ound in

the an

terior m

idIin

e of th

e neck

, already d

escribed

above, an

d a larg

e gap

ing w

ound

of th

e sku

ll in th

e righ

t occip

ital parietal reg

ion

(8).

As a m

atter of fact, th

ere were tw

o ad

ditio

nal w

ou

nd

s of

the b

ody th

at none o

f the atten

din

g p

hysician

s at Park

land

Mem

orial H

osp

ital noted

. These w

ere a wound in

the u

pper

right p

osterio

r chest w

all, just ab

ove th

e upper b

ord

er of th

e rig

ht scap

ula, an

d a w

ound in

the rig

ht o

ccipital reg

ion, ap

-pro

xim

ately o

ne in

ch to

the rig

ht o

f the m

idlin

e and slig

htly

ab

ove th

e extern

al occip

ital pro

tuberan

ce (9). T

he fact th

at th

ese two w

onnds w

ere not o

bserv

ed o

r com

men

ted u

pon u

ntil

som

e time after th

e auto

psy

pro

duced

much

constern

ation an

d

added considerably to the numerous rum

ors and misconceptions

that arose following the assassination.

It must b

e stated, h

ow

ever, th

at the su

rgeo

ns sh

ould

not

be criticized for having failed to observe these other two w

ounds prio

r to th

e pro

nouncem

ent o

f the P

residen

t's death

. Certain

ly,

it is understan

dab

le and in

deed

med

ically so

und th

at all their

attentio

n sh

ould

hav

e been

directed

to th

e vario

us m

edical an

d

surg

ical measu

res that ...ere u

ndertak

en in

an attem

pt to

save

Pre,sid

ent K

enned

y's life (1

0). It w

as not th

eir duty

or m

edical

responsib

ility to

search th

e body at th

at poin

t for o

ther w

ounds.

It is true th

at a rapid

, curso

ry ex

amin

ation o

f the en

tire body sh

ould

be p

erform

ed in

cases of m

ultip

le inju

ries, for it is

often

the case th

at an im

med

iate laceration o

r inju

ry th

at ap

pears to

be q

uite serio

us is in

reality n

ot th

e majo

r inju

ry

involv

ed. T

herefo

re, it is necessary

to ch

eck an

d see if th

ere are o

ther m

ore serio

us in

ternal o

r extern

al inju

ries that m

ust

be attended to primarily. H

owever, such w

as not the case in this in

stance. It w

ould

hav

e mad

e no d

ifference w

hat o

ther in

juries

the P

residen

t had

; the larg

e, gap

ing d

efect in th

e skull w

ith

exten

sive laceratio

n an

d h

emorrh

age o

f the b

rain tissu

e quite

obvio

usly

was th

e prim

ary in

jury

that h

ad to

be ev

aluated

and

treated im

med

iately. F

urth

ermore, as h

as already b

een su

g-

gested

above, fo

r all inten

ts and p

urp

oses, th

e Presid

ent w

as dead or dying during the tim

e that he was at P

arkland Mem

orial H

osp

ital, and th

ere was n

o real m

edical n

eed to

look elsew

here

for other body wounds.

The critical q

uestio

n, h

ow

ever, arises w

ith reg

ard to

what

the d

octo

rs did

, or, rath

er, failed to

do, after th

e Presid

ent w

as pronounced dead at one p. in. A

t that time, one or tw

o additional m

inutes m

ight h

ave p

reven

ted m

uch

appreh

ensio

n, fear, an

d

specu

lation o

n th

e part o

f man

y p

eople. O

nce th

e Presid

ent

was p

ronounced

dead

, it would

hav

e taken

only

a few m

inutes

quick

ly to

exam

ine th

e rest of th

e body to

see wheth

er or n

ot

there w

ere any o

ther p

enetratin

g w

ounds (1

1). C

ertainly

, the

physician

s should

hav

e been

aware o

f the im

portan

ce of su

ch

a determ

inatio

n at th

at time an

d ev

en if th

ey w

ere not, th

e S

ecret Serv

ice agen

ts and

the o

ther p

eop

le in th

e Presid

ential

party should have had sufficient presence of mind to have asked

the physicians to conduct such an examination.

At th

e time, n

obody really

knew

what h

ad h

appen

ed, an

d

there w

as much

confu

sion as to

wheth

er or n

ot th

e bullets h

ad

all been

fired fro

m o

ne p

oin

t, or w

heth

er they

had

been

fired

by m

ore th

an o

ne p

erson fro

m d

ifferent lo

cations. F

or all

anyone knew, it w

as quite possible that there was a revolutionary

plo

t in th

e mak

ing, o

r that a sm

all ban

d o

f right-w

ing fan

atics or C

om

munists w

ere attemptin

g to

take o

ver th

e country

. A

bsu

rd as th

is may

seem at th

is time, w

hen

one co

nsid

ers the

events and circumstances of th

at tragic day in N

ovember 1.963

it was n

ot ab

surd

to h

ave co

nsid

erixl su

ch a p

ossib

ility then.

304 s.

July

1566

Vrdl. 11 •

No. 3

3(15

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

Unfo

rtunately

, no su

ch ex

amin

ation o

f the P

residen

t's body w

as perfo

rmed

after he w

as pro

nounced

dead

; therefo

re, rum

ors

imm

ediately

dev

eloped

, and w

ere spread

by m

any p

eople fo

r vario

us reaso

ns, th

at the P

residen

t had

been

shot fro

m b

oth

th

e fro

nt a

nd th

e b

ack. A

lthough w

e n

ow

know

that th

is w

as not so

, man

y p

eople still d

o n

ot accep

t the fact th

at Presi-

den

t Ken

ned

y w

as shot o

nly

twice, w

ith b

oth

bullets h

avin

g

entered from the back.

Exam

ination of Clothing and S

tretchers at Hospital

It should

be n

oted

at this tim

e that all th

e Presid

ent's clo

thes

were n

ot rem

oved

from

his b

ody at P

arklan

d M

emorial H

os-

pital (1

2). F

ortu

nately

, they

were av

ailable fo

r subseq

uen

t ex

amin

ation in

Wash

ingto

n, D

. C., an

d th

e analy

sis perfo

rmed

on th

e areas of m

issile pen

etration h

elped

to co

nfirm

which

w

ere

bulle

t wounds o

f exit a

nd w

hic

h w

ere

those

of e

n-

trance (1

3).

It is sad to

note th

at such

was n

ot th

e case with

Govern

or

Connally

's cloth

ing. F

or so

me reaso

n, n

ever ex

plain

ed in

the

Warren

Com

missio

n R

eport o

r apparen

tly co

mm

ented

on b

y

anybody in

a public o

r official m

anner, th

e govern

or's clo

thes

were clean

ed p

rior to

any ex

amin

ation, th

us m

akin

g an

y fin

d-

ings im

possib

le or in

valid

(14). H

ow

this co

uld

hav

e hap

-pen

ed is a so

urce o

f amazem

ent, an

d it is an

oversig

ht so

undly

to

be co

ndem

ned

and criticized

. It should

be rem

embered

that

much

of th

e confu

sion th

at dev

eloped

subseq

uen

tly w

ith reg

ard

to th

e num

ber o

f bullets th

at were fired

, the an

gle an

d d

irection,

etc., stemm

ed fro

m th

e fact that it w

as not clear w

heth

er or

not th

e bullet th

at wounded

Govern

or C

onnally

was th

e same

bullet th

at had

passed

thro

ugh th

e Presid

ent's b

ody first. It

is quite p

robab

le that th

is questio

n co

uld

hav

e bean

quick

ly

answ

ered co

rrectly if th

e govern

or's clo

thin

g h

ad n

ot b

een

cleaned prior to examination.

The stretch

ers that th

e Presid

ent an

d th

e govern

or w

ere placed

on w

ere not ex

amin

ed o

fficially after th

e Presid

ent w

as pro

nounced

dead

and th

e govern

or w

as removed

to su

rgery

. It w

as durin

g th

e subseq

uen

t routin

e and u

nofficial h

andlin

g

of th

e stretcher b

y a h

osp

ital attendan

t that a b

ullet w

as found

on o

ne o

f the tw

o stretch

ers. The W

arren C

om

missio

n, after

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

—C

RIT

IQU

E O

F M

ED

ICA

L A

SP

EC

TS

interro

gatin

g m

any o

f the p

eople p

resent at th

e hosp

ital, con-

cluded

that th

e bullet w

as from

Govern

or C

onnally

's stretcher,

although th

is could

not b

e stated w

ith ab

solu

te certainty

(15).

Again

, this is a b

lunder sh

arply

to b

e criticized, fo

r there

can b

e no d

oubt th

at it added

to th

e confu

sion th

at reigned

in

the m

inds o

f man

y fo

llow

ing th

e assassinatio

n. C

ertainly

, after th

e Presid

ent w

as pro

nounced

dead

, and th

e govern

or w

as rem

oved

to su

rgery

, the stretch

er should

hav

e been

carefully

ex

amin

ed to

see wheth

er or n

ot an

y b

ullets, o

r fragm

ents o

f bullets, w

ere present.

A V

isit from the C

oroner I h

ave h

eard sev

eral foren

sic path

olo

gists co

mm

ent th

at if th

e assassinatio

n h

ad o

ccurred

in th

eir jurisd

ictions, th

e body

would

nev

er hav

e been

taken

from

their cities u

ntil an

auto

psy

had

been

perfo

rmed

. Alth

ough I ag

ree with

this p

hilo

sophy

gen

erally, I can

not accep

t it in th

is particu

lar case. As h

as been

stated ab

ove, at th

e time o

f the sh

ootin

g o

f Presid

ent

Kennedy, nobody could state w

ith certainty what the nature and

exten

t of th

e assassinatio

n attem

pt w

as. For all th

at anybody

knew, there could have been a revolutionary plot involving m

any peo

ple. It w

as essential fo

r the p

residen

tial party

to retu

rn

to W

ashin

gto

n an

d to

get th

e now

Presid

ent Jo

hnso

n o

ut o

f D

alla

s imm

edia

tely

. Furth

erm

ore

, with

out a

ttem

ptin

g to

categorize every type of case that could create a knotty problem

as reg

ards th

e questio

n o

f local m

edical ex

amin

er or co

roner

jurisd

iction, I fin

d it q

uite easy

to d

raw th

e line w

ith th

e body

of th

e Presid

ent o

f the U

nited

States. I see n

o reaso

n w

hy,

if a Presid

ent is assassin

ated, th

e body sh

ould

remain

at the

place o

f assassinatio

n fo

r exam

inatio

n b

y th

e local co

roner o

r m

edical ex

amin

er. To p

ut it in

anoth

er light, I b

elieve th

at th

ere is an o

verrid

ing m

atter of p

olitical co

ncern

to th

e natio

n

that su

persed

es the im

med

iate pow

ers and p

hilo

sophies o

f the

local medical-legal investigative facility. P

rofessional pride must

yield to grave political practicality in such instances! If th

e situatio

n h

ad n

ot b

een so

tragic, th

ere would

hav

e been so

nic

hum

or in

volv

ed in

the a

ttem

pts m

ade b

y th

e

local officials to have the body of President K

ennedy kept within

Dallas (1

6). T

he W

arren C

om

missio

n R

eport d

escribes th

e presen

ce on th

e scene o

f one o

f the ju

stices of th

e peace w

ho

306 Ju

ly 1966

Vol. It • N

o. 3

:107

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T—

CR

ITIQ

UE

OF

ME

DIC

AL

AS

PE

CT

S

attempted

to "tak

e charg

e" and w

ho d

eman

ded

that th

e body

be k

ept in

Dallas fo

r the p

erform

ance o

f an au

topsy

. This

gen

tleman

was a p

ersistent in

div

idual; h

e follo

wed

the p

resi-den

tial party

outsid

e the h

osp

ital after the b

ody h

ad b

een re-

moved

to an

ambulan

ce, and h

e knock

ed o

n th

e win

dow

of th

e car in

which

Presid

ential A

ssistant K

enneth

O'D

onnell w

as rid

ing

. He w

as, of co

urse, ig

no

red, an

d th

e presid

ential p

arty

sped

on to

the airp

ort. O

ne can

visu

ally im

agin

e the scen

e in

which

a little "neb

bish

" is runnin

g aro

und th

e hosp

ital amid

th

is great co

nflict an

d d

rama, attem

ptin

g to

issue o

rders re-

gard

ing

the d

ispo

sition

of th

e bo

dy

of th

e Presid

ent o

f the

United

States. T

his lo

cal official sh

ould

hav

e had

the g

ood

sense an

d th

e go

od

taste to h

ave acted

in a less co

nsp

icuo

us

and m

ore p

rivate m

anner. C

ertainly

, if the m

edical ex

amin

er o

f Dallas C

ou

nty

felt very

stron

gly

abo

ut th

e case, he m

igh

t have b

een in

vite

d to

atte

nd th

e a

uto

psy

in W

ash

ingto

n,

D. C

. (17), alth

ough I fran

kly

doubt it in

light o

f the o

fficial an

d m

ilitary ap

pro

ach w

ith w

hich

the au

top

sy w

as han

dled

at B

ethesda Naval M

edical Center.

New

s Conferences by M

edical Personnel at. P

arkland Mem

orial H

ospital I w

ould

not ag

ree that it w

as impro

per an

d u

nw

ise to co

nduct

a m

ed

ical c

on

fere

nce a

t the h

osp

ital fo

llow

ing

Pre

siden

t K

enned

y's d

eath (1

8). O

nce ag

ain, w

hen

one b

ears in m

ind

that th

is was th

e assassinatio

n o

f the P

residen

t, one m

ust realize

that th

e natio

n h

ad a rig

ht to

expect in

form

ation co

ncern

ing

his d

eath

. Th

ere

fore

, I belie

ve th

at it w

as q

uite

pro

per to

conduct the new

s conference. How

ever, the substance and extent of th

e statemen

ts mad

e by th

e physician

s at the m

edical co

n-

ference should be comm

ented upon. T

he fact th

at there

som

e differen

ce of o

pin

ion am

ong th

e physicians and the new

s media personnel as to exactly w

hat was

said at th

e conferen

ce, and fu

rther th

at this ap

paren

t confu

sion

and con flict continued to exist in terms of the testim

ony recited before. the W

V: ► rren

Conunissio

n, w

ould

seem to

pro

ve th

at one

or m

ore o

f the P

arklan

d M

emorial H

osp

ital physician

s did

stale, o

r at least agreed

to a q

uestio

n p

osed

by o

ne o

f the n

ews-

men

, that th

e pen

etrating w

ound o

f the n

eck co

uld

hav

e been

a g

unsh

et entran

ce wound (1

9). T

his co

mm

ent alo

ne p

roduced

a con

siderab

le amo

un

t of su

bseq

uen

t misco

ncep

tion

, as has

already been explained above. T

he p

hysician

s who w

ere in atten

dan

ce should

hav

e born

e in

min

d th

e fact that th

ey h

ad n

ot ex

amin

ed th

e entire b

ody

and, th

erefore, co

uld

not b

e certain as to

what th

e exact n

ature

and ex

tent o

f the in

juries w

ere. Furth

ermore, ev

en th

ough

they

had

seen tw

o o

f the w

ou

nd

s, they

cou

ld n

ot co

mm

ent as

foren

sic path

olo

gists w

ho

had

perfo

rmed

the au

top

sy an

d ex

-am

ined the wounds grossly and m

icroscopically, and who could,

therefo

re, be ab

le to state w

ith m

edical certain

ty w

heth

er or

not the wounds w

ere those of exit or entrance. T

heir co

mm

ents reg

ardin

g th

e natu

re of th

e bullet w

ounds

were im

pru

den

t, med

ically u

nso

und, an

d q

uite u

nnecessary

. It w

ou

ld h

ave b

een su

fficient to

state "that th

e Presid

ent h

ad

died

as a result o

f severe h

ead in

juries in

flicted b

y a g

unsh

ot

wo

un

d." A

ll the m

edical co

mm

ents sh

ou

ld h

ave b

een h

and

led

by one physician representing the entire team of m

edical people w

ho

had

attend

ed th

e Presid

ent p

rior to

his d

eath. T

his p

hy

si-cian

should

hav

e stated firm

ly th

at he w

as not ab

le to m

ake

ailditio

nal co

mm

ents at th

at time u

ntil h

e had

had

a chan

ce to

review

all the fin

din

gs w

ith h

is colleag

ues an

d to

study

the au

top

sy rep

ort. If th

is had

been

do

ne, th

ere is no

do

ub

t in

my m

ind th

at a great d

eal of th

e subseq

uen

t confu

sion w

ould

have been elim

inated.

1'08bl:erten' Exam

ination at Bethesda N

aval Medical C

enter T

he body of President K

ennedy was taken to B

ethesda Naval

Med

ical Cen

ter pu

rsuan

t to a req

uest b

y M

rs. Ken

ned

y, w

ho

felt th

at the au

topsy

should

be d

one th

ere becau

se of th

e Presi-

den

t's service in

the N

avy d

urin

g W

orld

War II. T

here can

h

e no

qu

arrel with

this d

ecision

, for B

ethesd

a Nav

al Ho

spital

certainly

is a large in

stitutio

n w

ith ad

equ

ate facilities for th

e perform

ance of a competent autopsy.

A p

oin

t strongly

to b

e criticized is th

e fact that th

e three

path

olo

gists w

ho w

ere desig

nated

by th

e govern

men

t to p

er-fo

rm th

e auto

psy

did

not co

ntact th

e physician

s at Park

land

Mem

orial H

osp

ital in D

allas, Tex

as, prio

r to th

e initiatio

n o

f th

e auto

psy

(20). It sh

ould

be st: .lard

pro

cedure fo

r every

fo

rensic p

atholo

gist w

ho is g

oin

g to

exam

ine a p

erson w

ho h

as

308 Ju

ly M

G

Vo

l. 1 I • N

o. 3

300

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

died from m

ultiple bullet wounds, and w

ho has additional wounds

of penetration apparently produced by various surgical measures

perfo

rmed

prio

r to d

eath, to

first check

with

the su

rgeo

ns w

ho

attended

the p

erson an

d fin

d o

ut ex

actly w

hat w

ounds w

ere presen

t befo

re the su

rgical in

cisions w

ere mad

e, which

surg

ical in

cisions w

ere mad

e thro

ugh p

reexistin

g w

ounds, an

d w

hich

surgical incisions w

ere made in other parts of the body unrelated

to p

reexistin

g w

ounds. H

ad th

is been

done, th

en so

me o

f the

confu

sion th

at apparen

tly co

ntin

ued

to ex

ist thro

ughout th

e perfo

rman

ce of th

e auto

psy

and afterw

ards w

ould

hav

e been

elim

inated

. The p

atholo

gists w

ould

hav

e been

told

about th

e neck w

ound, and they would have learned that the tracheostom

y had

been

perfo

rmed

thro

ugh th

e site of a p

reexistin

g b

ullet

wound. it is d

ifficult to

understan

d w

hy at least o

ne o

f the

three pathologists did not speak with one or m

ore of the surgeons in

Dallas, T

exas, at so

me lessth

prio

r to th

e perfo

rman

ce of

the autopsy. T

he w

ork

of th

e foren

sic path

olo

gist is d

ifficult en

ough; it

should

nev

er be red

uced

to a g

uessin

g g

ame w

hen

this is n

ot

necessary

. Any an

d all clin

ical info

rmatio

n th

at can b

e obtain

ed

befo

re perfo

rman

ce of th

e auto

psy

is alway

s valu

able an

d

should be sought out whenever possible.

Choice of P

athologists I d

o n

ot b

elieve th

at the g

overn

men

t was w

ise in its ch

oice

of p

atholo

gists. O

ne o

r more p

rom

inen

t civilian

path

olo

gists

should

hav

e been

called in

to h

elp p

erform

the au

topsy

, and I

furth

er believ

e that th

e auto

psy

should

hav

e been

perfo

rmed

only

by q

ualified

foren

sic path

olo

gists. T

here is a d

efinite

specialty

of fo

rensic p

atholo

gy an

d it is so

recognized

by th

e A

merican

Board

of P

atholo

gy, w

hich

giv

es 'subsp

ecialty b

oard

ex

amin

ations in

this field

. The p

ractice, experien

ce and k

now

l-ed

ge o

f a foren

sic path

olo

gist are to

a great ex

tent q

uite d

if-feren

t from

[hat o

f a gen

eral hosp

ital path

olo

gist. N

o m

atter how

skilled

a hosp

ital path

olo

gist m

ay b

e, and n

o m

atter how

m

any au

topsies h

e may

hav

e perfo

rmed

, in th

e absen

ce of

specific train

ing, ex

perien

ce and k

now

ledge in

the field

of

forn

e,:ic path

olo

gy, h

e should

not b

e called u

pon to

perfo

rm

an au

topsy

in a co

mplicated

med

ical-legal case. C

ertainly

, the

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

—C

RIT

IQU

E O

P M

ED

ICA

L A

SP

EC

TS

performance of the autopsy in this case w

as such a complex and

importan

t even

t that it sh

ould

not h

ave in

cluded

path

olo

gists

lacking extensive forensic experience. It is m

y u

nderstan

din

g th

at two o

f the th

ree path

olo

gists

1 w

ho performed the autopsy are not forensic pathologists, nam

ely C

om

man

der J. J. H

um

es and C

om

man

der J. T

horn

ton B

osw

ell, of B

ethesd

a Nav

al Med

ical Cen

ter. Fortu

nately

, som

eone d

id

hav

e the g

ood ju

dgm

ent to

call in L

ieuten

ant C

olo

nel P

ierre A

. Fin

ck, M

. C., U

. S

. A., w

ho is a w

ell-trained

and v

ery

com

peten

t foren

sic path

olo

gist w

ith p

articular ex

perien

ce and

know

ledge in

the field

of m

issile wounds (2

1). O

ne can

only

co

njectu

re how

inad

equate an

d in

com

plete th

e results o

f the

autopsy findings would have been if C

olonel Finck had not been

present. W

ith reg

ard to

the q

uestio

n o

f utilizin

g civ

ilian fo

rensic

path

olo

gists, it m

ust b

e born

e in m

ind th

at man

y o

f the fo

re-m

ost fo

rensic p

atholo

gists in

the co

untry

are located

with

in

a flyin

g d

istance o

f one h

our o

r less from

Wash

ingto

n, D

. C.

It would

hav

e been

easy to

hav

e had

one o

r more o

f these

men

presen

t for th

e auto

psy

. Dr. R

ussell F

isher in

Baltim

ore,

Dr. Jo

seph S

peb

ran in

Philad

elphia, D

r. Milto

n H

e!peril in

N

ew Y

ork

, Dr. G

eoffrey

Man

n in

Virg

inia, an

d D

r. Alan

M

oritz in Cleveland, are only som

e of the people who are located

in areas q

uite clo

se to W

ashin

gto

n, D

. C. an

d w

ho co

uld

hav

e been

called u

pon b

y th

e govern

men

t to assist. (In

deed

, all these

men

hav

e prev

iously

been

utilized

by th

e govern

men

t to assist

in teach

ing an

d research

pro

gram

s as foren

sic path

olo

gists.

Were th

ose o

ccasions m

ore im

portan

t than

the au

topsy

of

President K

ennedy?)

Autopsy R

esults T

here are sev

eral thin

gs th

at hav

e been

criticized w

ith reg

ard

to th

e auto

psy

report, an

d it is tru

e that b

y th

e standard

s of m

ost competent m

edical-legal investigative facilities throughout th

e United

States th

e official au

topsy

report released

in th

e case o

f Presid

ent K

enned

y w

ould

not b

e consid

ered to

be a

complete one.

One o

f the th

ings th

at has b

oth

ered m

any p

eople is w

hy

there w

as no m

ei.Lio

n o

f the ad

renal g

lands, eith

er gro

ssly

or microscopically (22). I believe that there are obvic us political

310 Ju

ly 1

966

VO

L 11 • N

o. 3

31.1

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T—

CR

ITIQ

UE

OF

ME

DIC

AL

AS

PE

CT

S

overto

nes im

plied

in th

is questio

n. T

he sam

e questio

n as to

wh

ether o

r no

t Presid

ent K

enned

y h

ad A

dd

ison

's Disease w

as

raised b

y certain

peo

ple d

urin

g th

e election

camp

aign

in 1

96

0,

and th

ere was an

obvio

us an

d d

efinite attem

pt to

dam

age h

im

politically

by creatin

g d

oubts w

ithin

the m

inds o

f the p

eople

of th

e United

States as to

the statu

s of h

is health

. I believ

e

that so

me o

f these sam

e peo

ple, p

articularly

elemen

ts of th

e

political rig

ht w

ing, are resp

onsib

le for m

uch

clamor sin

ce the

Warren

Com

missio

n R

eport w

as publish

ed w

ith reg

ard to

the

failure o

f the p

atholo

gists to

hav

e com

men

ted o

n th

e adren

al

glan

ds. It sh

ould

he rep

eated th

at Presid

ent K

enned

y's d

eath

would

have o

ccurre

d n

o m

atte

r what th

e c

onditio

n o

f his

adren

al glan

ds w

as; therefo

re, from

a political an

d p

ractical

standpoin

t, it is of n

o co

nseq

uen

ce for u

s to k

now

what th

e

adrenal glands showed. H

owever, w

hen one performs a m

edical-

legal autopsy, particularly one of such a complex and significant

natu

re, it is necessary

for all th

e find

ing

s to b

e carefully

re-

corded and published. A

poin

t that larg

ely h

as been

overlo

oked

is the fact th

at

the au

topsy

report w

as turn

ed o

ver to

Adm

iral Burk

ley, th

e

Presid

ent's p

ersonal p

hysician

, who released

those p

ortio

ns th

at

he fe

lt were

"necessa

ry." It is m

y su

rmise

, not su

bje

ct to

certain co

nfirm

ation, th

at the p

atholo

gists w

ho p

erform

ed th

e

auto

psy

did

ind

eed fin

d, id

entify

, and

describ

e the ad

renal

glan

ds g

rossly

and m

icrosco

pically

, and th

at such

findin

gs an

d

descrip

tion

s were co

ntain

ed w

ithin

their fin

al repo

rt sub

mitted

to A

dm

iral Burk

ley. T

herefo

re, it is only

fair to state th

at

any criticism

that is to

be m

ade co

ncern

ing th

is aspect o

f the

postm

ortem

report m

ight w

ell be lev

elled at A

dm

iral Burk

ley

and o

ther h

igh g

overn

men

t officials if th

ey w

ere responsib

le

for d

etermin

ing w

hat w

as om

itted an

d w

hat w

as released.

The p

atholo

gists can

not b

e criticized if th

is were th

e case.

How

ever, this deficiei; y further supports ths previous comm

ent

that th

e auto

psy

should

not h

ave b

een left en

tirely w

ithin

the

han

ds o

f military

path

olo

gists, w

hose p

rofessio

nal actio

ns m

ay

be completely controllable by the governm

ent. F

rom

anoth

er view

poin

t, also, it is u

nfo

rtunate if A

dm

iral

Bu

ckley

and

/or o

ther g

ov

ernm

ent o

fficials decid

ed n

ot to

r^_-

lease the p

atholo

gists' fin

din

gs an

d d

iagnoses co

ncern

ing P

resi-

den

t Ken

ned

y's ad

renal g

lands. A

ssum

ing th

at there w

as som

e

evid

ence o

f adren

al insu

fficiency

(i. e., Addiso

n's D

isease), I

suggest th

at it would

hav

e been

a good th

ing to

let the g

eneral

public k

now

this. T

he realizatio

n th

at a perso

n w

ho su

ffers

from a serious disease process or physical handicap is not neces-

sarily d

isqualified

or in

capacitated

from

filling an

importan

t

positio

n, ev

en o

ne as stren

uously

dem

andin

g as th

e Presid

ency

of the United S

tates of Am

erica, would again encourage a m

ore

bro

ad-m

inded

and in

telligen

t attitude am

ong th

e lay p

ublic

tow

ard p

eople w

ho are h

andicap

ped

by illn

ess or trau

ma.

Autopsy X

-Rays and P

hotographs

The W

arren Com

mission R

eport notes that x-rays of the body

and p

hoto

grap

hs w

ere mad

e by th

e path

olo

gists (2

3). T

hese

were tu

rned

ov

er to a S

ecret Serv

ice agen

t imm

ediately

after

they

were tak

en, an

d, p

resum

ably

, the p

atho

log

ists, altho

ug

h

they

may

hav

e seen th

e dev

eloped

x-ray

films an

d p

hoto

grap

hs

later, did

not h

ave th

ese in th

eir possessio

n at th

e time o

f their

testimo

ny

(24

). Th

e films an

d p

ictures w

ere no

t presen

ted to

the W

arren C

om

missio

n, an

d it h

as been

stated th

at they

were d

estroyed

. It is not ex

actly clear w

ho d

estroyed

them

, or

when

and w

here th

ey w

ere destro

yed

; but it is ab

solu

tely in

de-

fensib

le and u

nju

stifiable th

at this sh

ou

ld h

ave h

app

ened

.

Conclusions of A

utopsy Report

I perso

nally

concu

r with

the co

nclu

sions o

f the au

topsy

re-

port, namely, that P

resident Kennedy w

as shot twice, once in the

back

of th

e head

, and o

nce in

the u

pper rig

ht ch

est (25). T

he

gunsh

ot w

ound in

the h

ead h

ad its en

trance p

oin

t imm

ediately

to th

e right o

f the m

idlin

e and ex

ited o

n th

e right lateral asp

ect

of the skull, causing extensive avulsion of bone and brain tissue.

This w

as undoubted

ly a fatal w

ound an

d to

tally in

com

patib

le

with life beyond a few

minutes.

The seco

nd w

ound en

tered th

e upper p

osterio

r right ch

est,

coursing in a slightly downw

ard angle and exiting in the middle

of th

e anterio

r neck

regio

n at ab

out th

e level o

f the k

not o

f

the tic. This w

ound would probably have been survived and if it

had not been for the head ;vound, the President's life very likely

could

hav

e been

saved

(26). T

his w

ound o

ccurred

first, and th

e

wound of the skull follow

ed seconds later.

312 July 1956

Vol. 11 • N

o. 3 313

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

W

AR

RE

N R

EP

OR

T—

CR

ITIQ

UE

OF

ME

DIC

AL

AS

PE

CT

S

It is to b

e noted

that th

e path

olo

gists stu

died

the g

unsh

ot

wounds m

icrosco

pically

and th

us co

nfirm

ed th

eir gro

ss auto

psy

opin

ions as to

which

were w

ounds o

f entran

ce and w

hich

were

wo

un

ds o

f exit (2

7). T

hese fin

din

gs fu

rther serv

e to co

rrob

orate

the W

arren C

om

missio

n's co

nclu

sion th

at the tw

o b

ullets th

at stru

ck P

residen

t Ken

ned

y w

ere fired fro

m a p

oin

t to th

e rear of the P

residential car. I a

lso a

gre

e th

at th

ere

were

thre

e b

ulle

ts fired a

nd th

at

all three b

ullets w

ere fired fro

m th

e same p

lace by th

e same

perso

n, n

amely

, from

the six

th flo

or o

f the b

ook d

eposito

ry

build

ing

by L

ee Osw

ald. O

ne sh

ot p

robab

ly m

issed, an

d it

is not p

ossib

le to state d

efinitely

what h

appen

ed to

that b

ullet.

One b

ullet w

as recovered

on G

overn

or C

onnally

's stretcher an

d

most lik

ely th

is bullet is th

e one th

at pen

etrated th

e govern

or's

posterio

r chest, ex

iting in

the an

terior ch

est, reenterin

g th

e dorsal su

rface of th

e right w

rist, exitin

g fro

m th

e whir asp

ect of th

e right w

rist and reen

tering th

e left thig

h. F

ragm

ents

of an

oth

er bullet w

ere noted

with

in th

e skull o

f Presid

ent

Ken

ned

y o

n x

-ray film

s (23) an

d o

ther frag

men

ts were fo

und

in the car. S

om

e contro

versy

exists as to

wheth

er or n

ot th

e bullet th

at in

jured

Govern

or C

onnally

was th

e same b

ullet th

at pen

etrated

Presid

ent K

enned

y's ch

est. It is very

likely

that th

is was th

e ease, alth

ough th

ere is still som

e doubt ab

out th

is. It is possib

le th

at the b

ullet th

at inju

red G

overn

or C

onnally

was th

e third

bullet, to

tally sep

arate from

the tw

o b

ullets th

at struck

Presi-

den

t Ken

ned

y. A

gain

, one is rem

inded

of th

e imp

ortan

ce of

Govern

or C

onnally

's cloth

es, for h

ad th

ey b

een av

ailable fo

r exam

ination, it might w

ell be that careful and detailed examina-

tion w

ould

hav

e answ

ered o

nce an

d fo

r all We q

uestio

n o

f w

heth

er or n

ot th

e bullet th

at entered

Govern

or C

onnally

's rig

ht p

osterio

r chest w

all was th

e same b

ullet th

at had

already

gone th

rough P

residen

t Ken

ned

y's n

eck o

r wheth

er it was a

separate shot. It is fascin

ating to

note h

ow

vario

us in

adeq

uacies an

d sh

ort-

com

ings o

f the to

tal investig

ation are in

termin

gled

and h

ave

ramificatio

ns th

roughout th

e entire p

ostm

ortem

evalu

ation an

d

the ev

ents th

at follo

wed

the sh

ootin

g o

f Presid

ent K

enned

y.

Actual R

eport Before the W

arren Com

mission

Lieutenant C

olonel Pierre F

inck produced an exhibit in which

he d

emonstrated

missile w

ounds g

enerally

and d

iscussed

the

specific missile w

ounds involved in the assassination of President

Ken

ned

y an

d th

e woundin

g o

f Govern

or C

onnally

(29). T

his

is the u

tilization o

f dem

onstrativ

e scientific ev

iden

ce in its

fullest an

d b

est sense. It d

ramatically

represen

ts som

ethin

g

that all forensic scientists should be concerned about and some-

thin

g th

at all foren

sic scientists an

d atto

rney

s should

contin

ue

to strive for. If more of this type of evidence had been produced

thro

ughout th

e vario

us stag

es of th

e post-assassin

ation ev

alua-

tion, then many of the m

isconceptions, misunderstandings, fears

and ru

mors th

at spread

thro

ughout th

e world

, and w

hich

in

significan

t measu

re contin

ue to

exist to

day

, would

hav

e been

dim

inished greatly, if not circumvented com

pletely.

Rote of the A

merican A

estlemy of F

orensic Sciences

Fin

ally, I sh

ould

like to

raise the q

uestio

n as to

why th

e A

merican

Acad

emy o

f Foren

sic Scien

ces was n

ot co

nsu

lted b

y

the government in the post-assassination evaluation. T

he Am

eri-can A

cademy of F

orensic Sciences is com

prised of many of the

foremost forensic scientists, crim

inologists, and attorneys in the U

nited

States o

f Am

erica. It is an u

nbiased

, objectiv

e, non-

po

litical org

anizatio

n w

ho

se very

existen

ce is dev

oted

to an

d

based

up

on

the co

ncep

t of u

tilizing

the fo

rensic scien

ces to

the fu

llest exten

t possib

le, to th

e ultim

ate end th

at justice w

ill be best served.

It is quite u

naccep

table th

at this o

rgan

ization w

as not co

n-

sulted

in so

me cap

acity b

y a co

ncern

ed g

overn

men

tal agen

cy

and ask

ed to

mak

e availab

le its services an

d p

ersonnel. T

his

could

hav

e been

done in

a role an

alogous L

o th

at of a law

yer

who files an

amicu

s curiae b

rief in a L

egal case, o

r it could

hav

e been

han

dled

in an

y o

ne o

f several o

ther w

ays. In

any

event, this did not occur, and iL is unfortunate for all concerned.

I should

like to

believ

e that if ev

er a traged

y as h

orrib

le as the assassination of P

resident Kennedy occurs again the A

meri-

can A

cadem

y o

f Foren

sic Scien

ces will b

e consu

lted o

fficially

by the United S

tates Governm

ent.

314 Ju

ly MG

V

ol. II. • No. 3

3 15

JOU

RN

AL

OF

FO

RE

NS

IC S

CIE

NC

ES

WA

RR

EN

RE

PO

RT

-CR

ITIQ

UE

OF

ME

DIC

AL

AS

PE

CT

C

onclusion W

hile I ag

ree with

the u

ltimate co

nclu

sions o

f the W

arren

Com

mission and w

ith the various forensic scientists and patholo-gists w

ho were involved in the investigation, I believe that there

are man

y q

uestio

ns th

at remain

unan

swered

and th

at man

y o

f th

e conclu

sions are b

ased o

n less th

an ab

solu

te med

ical cer-tainty. F

urthermore, it w

ould have been possible to answer these

questio

ns in

many in

stances w

ith c

erta

inty

if the p

roper

measures had been undertaken at the appropriate tim

e. I d

o n

ot b

elieve th

at there w

as any o

vert p

lot o

n th

e part o

f an

y g

overn

men

tal agen

cy o

r specific in

div

idual to

keep

any o

f th

e facts suppressed

, with

the p

ossib

le excep

tion o

f the fin

din

gs

hav

ing to

do w

ith P

residen

t Ken

ned

y's ad

renal g

lands. H

ow

-ev

er, it should

be rem

embered

that as h

um

an b

eings w

e are all su

bject to

perso

nal b

iases and p

rejudices, an

d w

e are also

subject to

hav

ing o

ur th

oughts an

d o

pin

ions in

fluen

ced an

d

mold

ed b

y o

ur p

rofessio

nal asso

ciations. It is fo

r this reaso

n

that it w

ould

hav

e been

a very

wise th

ing fo

r the g

overn

men

t not o

nly

to h

ave called

upon civ

ilian fo

rensic p

atholo

gists to

particip

ate in th

e auto

psy

, but also

to h

ave called

upon th

e A

merican

Acad

emy o

f Foren

sic Scien

ces to act in

the ro

le of

advisor and consultant to Lhe W

arren Com

mission.

The o

rgan

ization b

est able to

hav

e prep

ared an

d ev

aluated

all the scientific evidence that cam

e before the Warren C

omm

is-sio

n w

as the A

merican

Acad

emy o

f Foren

sic Scien

ces. It is un-

fortu

nate th

at in th

e most p

olitically

significan

t and co

mplex

m

urd

er of th

e twen

tieth cen

tury

, such

expert co

nsu

ltation w

as not requested.

S tim 'nary

A critique of the m

edical circumstances and events associated

with

the assassin

ation o

f Presid

ent K

enned

y h

as been

under-

taken

. The treatm

ent g

iven

at Park

land M

emorial H

osp

ital, D

allas, Tex

as, and th

e auto

psy

perfo

rmed

at Beth

esda N

aval

Hosp

ital, Beth

esda, M

arylan

d, h

ave b

een rev

iewed

and co

m-

mented upon. W

hile th

e conclu

sions co

ntain

ed in

the R

eport o

f the P

resi-den

t's Cm

/missio

n o

n th

e Assassin

ation o

f Presid

ent Jo

hn F

. K

enned

y are co

nsid

ered to

be essen

tially co

rrect, several d

e-

ficiencies an

d g

aps in

the o

verall m

edical in

vestig

ation ar

com

men

ted u

pon. T

he failu

re of th

e com

missio

n to

hav

e cane

upon th

e Am

erican A

cadem

y o

f Foren

sic Scien

ces in a co

n

sultan

t capacity

durin

g th

e com

pilatio

n an

d ev

aluatio

n o

f it findings is noted.

RE

FE

RE

NC

ES

1. R

eport of the President's C

omm

ission on the Assassination of P

residen John F

. Kennedy. U

nited States C

overmuent P

rinting Office, W

ash ington, D

. C. V

olumes I-X

XV

I (1964). 2. Ibid., V

ol. VI, p. 41. See also V

ol. VI, p. 84.

3. Ibid., V

ol. III, p. 361. 4.

Ibid., Vol. III, p. 360.

5. Ibid., V

ol. III, p. 359. 6. Ibid., V

ol. III, p. 365. 7. Ibid., V

ol. III, p. 368. 8. Ibid., V

ol. III, pp. 361, 368. See also Vol. V

I, pp. 11, 25. 0. Ibid., V

ol. H, p. 351. See also V

ol. XV

I, p. 980. 10. Ibid., V

ol. TIT

, p. 361. 11. Ibid., V

ol. III, pp. 361, 363. 12. Ibid., V

ol. III, pp. 359, 363. 13. Ibid., V

ol. 11, p. 365. See also Vol. V

, p. 58. 14. Ibid., V

ol V, p. 63.

15. Ibid., V

ol. TI, p. 368. See also V

ol. VI, p. 134.

16. T

bid., Vol. V

II, p. 452. 17. Ibid., V

ol. VII, p. 452.

18. Ibid., V

ol. VI, p. 12.

19. Ibid., V

ol. VT

, p. 13. 20. Ibid., V

ol. II, pp. 361, 387. 21. Ibid., V

ol. TI, pp, 348, 349, 377.

22. Ibid., Vol. X

VI, pp. 982, 988.

23. Ibid., Vol. II, p. 349.

24. Ibid., Vol. II, p. 351.

25. Ibid., Vol. X

VI, p. 983.

26. Ibid., Vol. ITT, p. 372.

27. Ibid., Vol. X

VI, p. 088.

28. Ibid., Vol. IT

, p. 353. 29. Ibid., V

ol. IT, p. 379.

1.117 Frick 13uilding P

ittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219

31.6 July 1966

Vol. 11 • N

o. 3 317