tackling hunger in india

19
Tackling Hunger in India: Prospects and Challenges Biraj Patnaik Principal Adviser Office of the Commissioners to the Supreme Court (Right to Food Case) www.sccommissioners.org

Upload: undp-policy-centre

Post on 24-Apr-2015

1.234 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tackling Hunger in India

Tackling Hunger in India: Prospects and Challenges

Biraj PatnaikPrincipal Adviser

Office of the Commissioners to the Supreme Court (Right to Food Case)

www.sccommissioners.org

Page 2: Tackling Hunger in India

222

Hunger Map IFPRI 2009

Page 3: Tackling Hunger in India

33

Underweight Children: A Severe Problem in South Asia

Page 4: Tackling Hunger in India

444

P er cap ita G D P an d u n d erw eig h t ch ild ren

0

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

Mal

awi

Tanz

ania

Ethi

opia

Nig

erM

adag

asca

rZa

mbi

aM

ali

Ben

inK

enya

Bur

kina

Faso

Moz

ambi

que

Rw

anda

Uga

nda

Nep

alSe

nega

lM

aurit

ania

Lao

Gam

bia

Mon

golia

Cha

dC

amer

oon

Gui

nea

Paki

stan

Bhu

tan

Gha

naC

ambo

dia

Viet

nam

Indi

aSr

iLan

ka

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

G D P p e rc a p ita (U S$ )

U n d e rw e ig h t

Page 5: Tackling Hunger in India

5

38

37

37.625

22.929.8

32.5

39.9

44.6

25.6

42.4

60

39.6

24.9

26.1

36.5

56.5

40.747.1

48.855.936.4

19.7

22.1

39.619.9

32.5

25.2

38.7

Per cent

Below 30

30.0 - 39.9

40.0 - 49.9

50.0 and above

Missing Data NFHS

The underweight prevalence (children under age 5)varied from 60% in Madhya Pradeshto 20 % in Mizoram

Page 6: Tackling Hunger in India

66

Progress in reducing child malnutrition has been uneven

Improvements in 16 states

Largest improvements:

2005-06 1998-99 % diff.

Orissa 44.0 54.4 10.4

Maharashtra 39.7 49.6 9.9

Chhattisgarh 52.1 60.8 8.7

HP 36.2 43.6 7.4

Rajasthan 44.0 50.6 6.6

Page 7: Tackling Hunger in India

77

Situation worsens in 13 states

2005-06 1998-99 % diff.

Assam 40.4 36.0 -4.4

Jharkhand 59.2 54.3 -4.9

MP 60.3 53.5 -6.8

Haryana 41.9 34.6 -7.3

Also in Bihar, Gujarat and Kerala

Page 8: Tackling Hunger in India

8

•Food availability•Nutrient in-take•Seasonality of food and water•Nutrition and health education

•Absence of community workers/ANMs/Nurses•Non-access to cheap medicines•Diarrhoea, dysentery, fever, malaria

•Non-availability of health services-SHC/PHC/CHC•Immunization / ANC / PNC/ emergency care•Low institutional delivery

HIGH MALNUTRITION

Why high Malnutrition

•Low Birth Weight Babies•Early marriage and pregnancy•Non-spacing/anaemia among women

•Weak public health measures•Malaria, Water•Infections, Diseases•Sanitation

•Cultural practices•Breast feeding•Food consumption during pregnancy•Unsafe and unclean deliveries

Page 9: Tackling Hunger in India

• India has the highest underweight children among the BRIC and SAARC countries• Reasons: Inadequate access to food+ Lack of education of mother + Poor sanitation + Unsafe drinking water

Underweight children9

Nutrition: Very high percentage of underweight Nutrition: Very high percentage of underweight children - Even compared to SAARC countries (HDR children - Even compared to SAARC countries (HDR

2011)2011)

Page 10: Tackling Hunger in India

• Among industrial states, Gujarat has a high incidence of malnutrition among SC and ST women .

•In spite of high economic growth Gujarat fares the worst in terms of overall hunger index among high per-capita income states.

•It ranked 13 out of 17 major states in hunger index, below Orissa, UP, WB, and Assam etc. 10

Economic Growth versus Malnutrition Reduction (HDR 2011)

Page 11: Tackling Hunger in India

Open defecation - serious threat to health & Open defecation - serious threat to health & nutritional status (HDR 2011)nutritional status (HDR 2011)

Improvement in households with access to sanitation facilities from 40 % in 2002 to 51 % in 2008-9

Large inter state variations

Less than 2% hhs in Delhi lacked access to toilet facility compared to 79% in Orissa

11

Page 12: Tackling Hunger in India

Legal Action on the Right to Food

Initiated in 2001 following a PIL filed in the Supreme Court by People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) asking for the Right to Food to be made a fundamental right.

The case has emerged as the longest continuing mandamus in the world on the Right to Food.

So far, more than 70 interim orders have been passed in this case.

Page 13: Tackling Hunger in India

Outcomes so far

Mainstreamed discourse on the Right to Food in India

Principle of universal entitlements established with the universalisation of the Mid Day Meal and ICDS programmes

Conditions created for enactment of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act

Supreme Court orders help to convert 9 food and employment schemes into legal entitlements that are justiciable

Supreme Court orders result in massive increases in budget allocations for all the nine schemes

Page 14: Tackling Hunger in India

Distinctive features

Special focus on creating specific entitlements for marginalised groups such as the urban homeless, single women and persons with disabilities by.

Supreme Court sets up The Supreme Court Commissioners office as an independent oversight body, outside of Government

Supreme Court orders result in massive increases in budget allocations for all the nine schemes

Page 15: Tackling Hunger in India

The National Food Security Act

Page 16: Tackling Hunger in India

Imperatives for legislating the Right to Food

Moral Imperative

(High growth and yet hunger and malnutrition persist alongside poor social indicators)

Political Imperative

(Legislature vs.Judiciary)

“Electoral” imperative

(Anti-incumbency in the context of the 2009 General and State Elections)

Page 17: Tackling Hunger in India

Key elements proposed by Civil Society as the framework for the NFSA?

Offer legislative sanction to legal entitlements

Strengthen existing programmes.

Create new sets of entitlements for very marginalised groups and vulnerable communities.

Establish independent monitoring institutions empowered to redress grievances effectively (including punitive legal action)

Strengthen the “protect” and “respect” elements of the Right to Food including protection of livelihoods and production issues.

Page 18: Tackling Hunger in India

Issues and Challenges

1. Universal or targeted? Should the Act be applicable only to BPL families as currently envisaged?

2. Food or Food plus? Vision of the Food Ministry about the Act is restricted to provisioning of 25 kgs of

food grains at Rs.3 per kg ONLY for BPL families Government does not recognize nutrition as a capability contingent on factors other

than just provisioning of subsidised food. Food alone is not sufficient; need more things to be in place

3. Is it affordable?• What are the financial implications?• How will the entitlement be financed?

4. Will it see the light of day?1. No ownership by key institutions including the PMO and the Planning Commission.

2. Lack of consensus within civil society.3. Unlikely to attain convergence of schemes operated by five Ministries

Page 19: Tackling Hunger in India

Thank you