tackling plagiarism: the role of turnitin and webct

8
Tackling plagiarism: the role of Turnitin and WebCT Dr Heather Roberts Course Director, Master of Public Health

Upload: adonica

Post on 07-Jan-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Tackling plagiarism: the role of Turnitin and WebCT. Dr Heather Roberts Course Director, Master of Public Health. The problem. Cases of plagiarism Identified / unidentified Intentional or unintentional Culture of using quotes varies. Rationale for the approach used. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tackling plagiarism:  the role of Turnitin and WebCT

Tackling plagiarism: the role of Turnitin and WebCT

Dr Heather Roberts Course Director, Master of Public Health

Page 2: Tackling plagiarism:  the role of Turnitin and WebCT

The problem

Cases of plagiarism

Identified / unidentified

Intentional or unintentional

Culture of using quotes varies

Page 3: Tackling plagiarism:  the role of Turnitin and WebCT

Rationale for the approach used

“This information / these activities are intended to support you by learning/reinforcing key academic conventions, not to catch you out….”

You need to find out how to protect yourself

We – and you - need to protect the value of your degree

Page 4: Tackling plagiarism:  the role of Turnitin and WebCT

Multi-facetted 2007- 08 approach

1. Written information

Written information in handbook, public notices Signed student contract Assignment cover sheet

2. Pre course website with exercise http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/research/r_plagiar.html

3. Verbal information Preparation for first assessment Written

information in handbook, public notices Induction week : session on academic integrity

Page 5: Tackling plagiarism:  the role of Turnitin and WebCT

Use of Turnitin

Part of academic integrity induction sessionReal (anonymised) example shown

First assessment Optional : students submitted draft via WebCT

for own information – 24 hour limit

Compulsory : students submitted final version via WebCT for staff scrutiny. No submission, no mark.

Page 6: Tackling plagiarism:  the role of Turnitin and WebCT

Practical lessons learned

Using Turnitin is easier to use with WebCT (eg setting time limits)

Staff can’t see the student view of Turnitin on WebCT (I could see all draft submissions – panic!) but student sees only their own – very confusing

Had to give longer time for all students to have a chance to test draft – access to WebCT problems….

Quick to eyeball final texts that may have been suspect (exclude quotes, bibliography)

Page 7: Tackling plagiarism:  the role of Turnitin and WebCT

Student compliance and response

Anecdotal : students appreciated being able to do this and learned from the activity

No opposition

Most were able to follow my written instructions about submitting on WebCT

Most students used the opportunity to check their draft

Queries to me, mainly from international students

Most submitted final version quickly

Page 8: Tackling plagiarism:  the role of Turnitin and WebCT

Next year

Repeat process ….. but students to test any of their own written text earlier – reduce anxiety

A course / School / University policy Reluctant to have all course work

submitted to Turnitin Reserve the right to ask for electronic

copies and spot check as stated on their contract and in the handbook