tactile enumeration and brain plasticity in acquired...

1
A close relationship, an embodiment, between abstract numbers and fingers: Right hand muscles (left hemisphere) and small numerals (1-4) [1] Anatomical closeness between cortical areas for finger use and number magnitude mediation [2] The intraparietal sulcus (IPS) - representing the meaning of number [3] Acquired (Primary) Acalculia [4] Left IPS damage Deficits in numerical abilities Similarities with developmental dyscalculia [5] Slower counting in the acute phase - Larger RT slope for 1-4 stimuli Embodiment - traces in long-term memory for numerosity 5 Rehabilitation effect - change in the RT slope in time An increase in GM for NO in the right inferior occipital cortex during the acute and the chronic phases May be associated to the use of visual imagery and multisensory object representation following the loss of numerical and haptic abilities [9] Left IPS – essential for enumerating small quantities using fingers Tactile Enumeration and Brain Plasticity in Acquired Acalculia Zahira Z. Cohen, Isabel Arend, Ronel Veksler, Sharon Naparstek, Yarden Gliksman & Avishai Henik Departmentof Psychology and the Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel Fig. 4: RT and ACC of stimulating 1-5 fingers of the left hand, NO vs. Controls Correspondence: [email protected] TE task: The procedure of Crawford and colleagues [7,8] for comparing an individual's test score against norms derived from small samples: Controls (N=44): Moderate RT slope for1-4 stimuli and a decrease in RT for 5 ACC – reverse pattern, mean accuracy 0.8 NO: Steep RT slope for 1-4 (p < .0001) in acute phase, and 1ML (p < .05) ACC – Marginally significant difference in acute phase (p < .08) Introduction Results Current Study Method References Discussion NO, 22, female with acalculia, following stroke to the left IPS [6] Average intellectual abilities, Intact visuo-spatial, language, memory and attention abilities Difficulties in an arithmetic battery, specifically in procedural knowledge Mental clock and numerical Stroop tasks - Larger distance effect, lack of facilitation and increased interference Task: tactile enumeration (TE) using one hand – How many fingers are stimulated? Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) - gray matter (GM) changes over time Time: Acute phase - 1 st month (1 st ), 1 month later (1ML), Chronic phases - 6 months later (6ML), and 1½ years later (18ML) + 1,000 ms + 100 ms + 800 ms + 1,600 ms Vibration 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy rate Numerosity - Left hand only Acute phase 1ML 6ML 18ML Controls 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 1 2 3 4 5 RT (ms) Numerosity - Left hand only Acute phase 1ML 6ML 18ML Controls High resolution T1 - weighted images TR = 2.2, TE = 3.03 ms, FOV 256 mm, 176 sagittal slices of 1 mm thickness, flip angle = 90°, voxel size 1 x 1 x 1 Analysis used optimized method of VBM for SPM 12. Spatial normalization to a stereotactic space, segmentation of normalized images (GM, WM, CSF), smoothing the images (8 mm) Independent sample t-test (covariate, Global Brain Volume) Number areas: Neurosynth imaging meta-analytic tool (http ://www.neurosynth.org/). A meta-analytic activation map based on 99 studies was generated. Each ROI consisted of a 6 mm sphere, which was used on a small volume correction approach All local maxima are separated by 20 mm; R = Right hemisphere; L = Left hemisphere X = -24; y = -42; z = 23 VBM results showing HC > NO The activation blob is warped back to NO's native space. Note the correspondence between the blob and NO's lesion boundary Inferior Parietal Cortex x = -29; y = -39; z = 20 HC > NO 1. Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Gallese, V. (2007). Numbers within our hands: modulation of corticospinal excitability of hand muscles during numerical judgment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(4), 684–693. 2. Simon, O., Mangin, J.-F., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron, 33(3), 475–487. 3. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83-120. 4. Takayama, Y., Sugishita, M., Akiguchi, I., & Kimura, J. (1994). Isolated acalculia due to left parietal lesion. Archives of Neurology, 51, 286-291. 5. Koontz, K. L., & Berch, D. B. (1996). Identifying simple numerical stimuli: Processing inefficiencies exhibited by arithmetic learning disabled children. Mathematical Cognition, 2(1), 1–24. 6. Gliksman, Y., Naparstek, S., Ifergane, G., & Henik, A. The role of the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS) in visual and imagery comparisons: Evidence from acquired acalculia. Manuscript in preparation. 7. Crawford, J., & Garthwaite, P. (2002). Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 8(40), 1196-1208. 8. Crawford, J., & Howell, D. (1998). Comparing an individual’s test score against norms derived from small samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(4), 482–486. 9. Lacey, S., Tal, N., Amedi, A., & Sathian, K. (2009). A putative model of multisensory object representation. Brain Topography, 21(3–4), 269–274. Fig. 2: Apparatus Fig. 1: Trial sequence TE task Tactile Enumeration Task: Voxel-Based Morphometry: Fig. 3: VBM results showing HC > NO ROI Analysis: Voxel-Based Morphometry: Fig. 5: VBM - Increase in gray matter volume (in red) for NO vs. controls Table 1: Brain areas associated to number processing HC<NO-6m FEW (.05) HC<NO –1m FEW (.05) Z Y X t- value Cluster Size Region Label 50 -36 50 7.44 639 R SupraMarginal Gyrus 54 -62 -24 7.24 550 L Superior Parietal Lobule 46 -48 -38 6.60 550 L Inferior Parietal Lobule p = . 01 ( vxl = 92 , T = 3.71 p = . 035 ( vxl = 53 , T = 3.25 - 4 - 86 42 6.09 31 R Inferior Occipital Gyrus 52 0 30 5.93 46 R Middle Frontal Gyrus BA6 22 38 50 5.82 38 R Middle Frontal Gyrus -2 -52 58 5.78 20 R Middle Temporal Gyrus 34 30 -46 5.13 33 L Middle Frontal Gyrus

Upload: votruc

Post on 08-Oct-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tactile Enumeration and Brain Plasticity in Acquired Acalculiain.bgu.ac.il/en/Labs/CNL/Pages/posters/2017/CNS2017_zahira.pdf · Title: Tactile Enumeration and Brain Plasticity in

Introduction

•A close relationship, an embodiment, between abstract numbers and

fingers:

• Right hand muscles (left hemisphere) and small numerals (1-4) [1]

• Anatomical closeness between cortical areas for finger use and number

magnitude mediation [2]

•The intraparietal sulcus (IPS) - representing the meaning of number [3]

• Acquired (Primary) Acalculia [4]

• Left IPS damage• Deficits in numerical abilities • Similarities with developmental dyscalculia [5]

• Slower counting in the acute phase - Larger RT slope for 1-4 stimuli• Embodiment - traces in long-term memory for numerosity 5• Rehabilitation effect - change in the RT slope in time• An increase in GM for NO in the right inferior occipital cortex

during the acute and the chronic phases• May be associated to the use of visual imagery and multisensory

object representation following the loss of numerical and haptic abilities [9]

• Left IPS – essential for enumerating small quantities using fingers

Tactile Enumeration and Brain Plasticity in Acquired AcalculiaZahira Z. Cohen, Isabel Arend, Ronel Veksler, Sharon Naparstek, Yarden Gliksman & Avishai Henik

Department of Psychology and the Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel

Fig. 4: RT and ACC of stimulating 1-5 fingers of the left hand, NO vs. Controls

Correspondence: [email protected]

Results - continue

TE task:• The procedure of Crawford and colleagues [7,8] for comparing an individual's

test score against norms derived from small samples:

• Controls (N=44): • Moderate RT slope for1-4 stimuli and a decrease in RT for 5• ACC – reverse pattern, mean accuracy 0.8

• NO:• Steep RT slope for 1-4 (p < .0001) in acute phase, and 1ML (p < .05)

• ACC – Marginally significant difference in acute phase (p < .08)

Introduction Results

Current Study

Method

References

Discussion

•NO, 22, female with acalculia, following stroke to the left IPS [6]

• Average intellectual abilities, Intact visuo-spatial, language, memory and attention abilities

• Difficulties in an arithmetic battery, specifically in procedural knowledge• Mental clock and numerical Stroop tasks - Larger distance effect, lack of

facilitation and increased interference

•Task: tactile enumeration (TE) using one hand – How many fingers are

stimulated?

•Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) - gray matter (GM) changes over time

•Time: Acute phase - 1st month (1st), 1 month later (1ML), Chronic phases - 6

months later (6ML), and 1½ years later (18ML)

+

1,000 ms+

100 ms +

800 ms +

1,600 ms

Vibration

0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.800.901.00

1 2 3 4 5

Acc

ura

cy r

ate

Numerosity - Left hand only

Acute phase1ML6ML18MLControls

0200400600800

100012001400160018002000

1 2 3 4 5R

T (m

s)

Numerosity - Left hand only

Acute phase1ML6ML18MLControls

• High resolution T1 - weighted images

TR = 2.2, TE = 3.03 ms, FOV 256 mm, 176 sagittal slices of

1 mm thickness, flip angle = 90°, voxel size 1 x 1 x 1

• Analysis used optimized method of

VBM for SPM 12. Spatial

normalization to a stereotactic

space, segmentation of normalized

images (GM, WM, CSF), smoothing

the images (8 mm)

• Independent sample t-test

(covariate, Global Brain Volume)

Number areas: Neurosynth imaging

meta-analytic tool

(http://www.neurosynth.org/). A

meta-analytic activation map based

on 99 studies was generated. Each

ROI consisted of a 6 mm sphere,

which was used on a small volume

correction approach

All local maxima are separated by 20 mm; R = Right hemisphere; L = Left hemisphere

X = -24; y = -42; z = 23

VBM results showing HC > NOThe activation blob is warped back to NO's native space. Note the correspondence between the blob and NO's lesion boundary

Inferior Parietal Cortex

x = -29; y = -39; z = 20

HC > NO

1. Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Gallese, V. (2007). Numbers within our hands: modulation of corticospinal excitability of hand muscles during numerical judgment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(4), 684–693.

2. Simon, O., Mangin, J.-F., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron, 33(3), 475–487. 3. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83-120.4. Takayama, Y., Sugishita, M., Akiguchi, I., & Kimura, J. (1994). Isolated acalculia due to left parietal lesion. Archives of Neurology, 51, 286-291.5. Koontz, K. L., & Berch, D. B. (1996). Identifying simple numerical stimuli: Processing inefficiencies exhibited by arithmetic learning disabled children. Mathematical Cognition, 2(1), 1–24.6. Gliksman, Y., Naparstek, S., Ifergane, G., & Henik, A. The role of the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS) in visual and imagery comparisons: Evidence from acquired acalculia. Manuscript in preparation.7. Crawford, J., & Garthwaite, P. (2002). Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 8(40), 1196-1208. 8. Crawford, J., & Howell, D. (1998). Comparing an individual’s test score against norms derived from small samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(4), 482–486. 9. Lacey, S., Tal, N., Amedi, A., & Sathian, K. (2009). A putative model of multisensory object representation. Brain Topography, 21(3–4), 269–274.

Fig. 2: ApparatusFig. 1: Trial sequence TE task

• Tactile Enumeration Task:

• Voxel-Based Morphometry:

Fig. 3: VBM results showing HC > NO• ROI Analysis:

Voxel-Based Morphometry:

Fig. 5: VBM - Increase in gray matter volume (in red) for NO vs. controls

Table 1: Brain areas associated to number processing

HC<NO-6mFEW (.05)

HC<NO – 1mFEW (.05)

ZYXt-

valueCluster

SizeRegion Label

50-36507.44639R SupraMarginal Gyrus

54-62-247.24550L Superior Parietal

Lobule

46-48-386.60550L Inferior Parietal Lobule

p = .01 (vxl = 92, T = 3.71

p = .035 (vxl = 53, T = 3.25

-4-86426.0931R Inferior Occipital

Gyrus

520305.9346R Middle Frontal Gyrus

BA6

2238505.8238R Middle Frontal Gyrus

-2-52585.7820R Middle Temporal Gyrus

3430-465.1333L Middle Frontal Gyrus