taiping movement devika bahadur

16
Devika Bahadur History III HISTORY OF CHINA AND JAPAN THE TAIPING MOVEMENT Q. “For Western historians the Taiping movement was nothing more than a peasant insurrection. For Communists it was nothing less than a full-fledged revolution.” Elucidate and comment on the nature of the Taiping Movement. China in the mid 19 th century was confronted by a series of crises, especially in the period following the Opium wars. Reactions to the western assault on China’s complacent sense of superiority and security were varied and could be seen at two levels – official and popular. The Taiping was one such movement, which manifested popular discontent at a time when China was reeling under the effects of the defeat in the Opium wars. The burden of the Unequal treaties, which China was saddled with, was shifted to the peasantry and discontent among them was building up. The attention which the Taiping movement attracted in the 1850s and 1860s all over the world was unprecedented. The Taiping movement, which rocked the Manchu dynasty during 1850-1864 covered 16 of the 18 provinces of China and 600 cities. Karl Marx called it a ‘formidable revolution’ and indeed the movement challenged not only Manchu authority but also the traditional Chinese Confucian beliefs that were the foundation of its authority. What made the Taiping different from earlier movements and even other contemporary movements such as the rebellions of Miao, Lolo, Nien or Moselm, was its concrete ideology and solid programme which went beyond simple displacement of Manchu authority. It aimed to bring about a complete reconstruction in all spheres of life political, economic, social and religious. In the course of its struggle, it formed a whole set of political, economic military educational and socio-cultural institutions and even founded its own state power, which struggled for a 1

Upload: himanshu-thakuria

Post on 17-Aug-2015

6 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Taiping Movement

TRANSCRIPT

Devika BahadurHistory IIIHISTORY OF CHINA AND JAPANTHE TAIPING MOVEMENTQ. For Western historians the Taiping movement was nothing more than a peasantinsurrection. For Communistsitwasnothinglessthanafull-fledgedrevolution.Elucidate and comment on the nature of the Taiping Movement.China in the mid !th "entury #as "on$ronted %y a series o$ "rises& es'e"ia((y in the 'eriod$o((o#in) the O'ium #ars* Rea"tions to the #estern assau(t on China+s "om'(a"ent senseo$ su'eriority and se"urity #ere varied and "ou(d %e seen at t#o (eve(s , o$$i"ia( and'o'u(ar* The Tai'in) #as one su"h movement& #hi"h mani$ested 'o'u(ar dis"ontent at atime#henChina#asree(in)underthee$$e"tso$thede$eat intheO'ium#ars* The%urdeno$ the -ne.ua( treaties& #hi"hChina #as sadd(ed#ith& #as shi$tedtothe'easantry and dis"ontent amon) them #as %ui(din) u'* The attention #hi"h the Tai'in)movement attra"ted in the /01s and /21s a(( over the #or(d #as un're"edented* The Tai'in) movement& #hi"h ro"ked the 3an"hu dynasty durin) !"#-!$% "overed 2o$ the / 'rovin"es o$ China and 211 "ities* 4ar( 3ar5 "a((ed it a 6$ormida%(e revo(ution+and indeed the movement "ha((en)ed not on(y 3an"hu authority %ut a(so the traditiona(ChineseCon$u"ian%e(ie$s that #erethe$oundationo$ its authority* 7hat madetheTai'in) di$$erent $rom ear(ier movements and even other "ontem'orary movements su"has the re%e((ions o$ 3iao& 8o(o& Nien or 3ose(mas its "on"rete ideo(o)y and so(id'ro)ramme #hi"h #ent %eyond sim'(e dis'(a"ement o$ 3an"hu authority* It aimed to%rin) a%out a complete reconstruction in all spheres of life , 'o(iti"a(& e"onomi"& so"ia(and re(i)ious* In the "ourse o$ its stru))(e& it $ormed a #ho(e set o$ 'o(iti"a(& e"onomi"mi(itary edu"ationa( and so"io9"u(tura( institutions and even $ounded its o#n state 'o#erhi"h stru))(ed $or a "onsidera%(e 'eriod a)ainst that o$ the 3an"hu dynasty& #hose ru(eit mana)ed to shake to the very $oundations*Inessen"e& as'ut %yJeanChesneau5& theTai'in)3ovement #asa:so"ia( "rusade&e5'ressin) the 'oor 'easants desire $or e.ua(ity& a nationa( "am'ai)n a)ainst the $orei)ndynastyo""u'yin)the throne inPekin)andthe modernist trendthat deve(o'edinres'onse to the "ha((en)e 'resented %y the #est throu)h the O'ium #ars* Traditiona( Chinese %e(ie$ su%s"ri%ed to the Con$u"ian theory that interna( distur%an"e&%e it 'o(iti"a( or even natura( disasters and e5terna( distur%an"es (ike $orei)n invasionso""urred on(y#hen an e5istin) 'o#er #as de"(inin)* For these distur%an"es thenmani$estedthemse(ves inthe#ithdra#a( o$ theMandateof &eaven* The'(nasticC(cle theor( has o$ten %een invoked %y #estern historians to understand and e5'(ain theout%reak o$ the Tai'in) movement* But the Dynasti" Cy"(e theory "annot %e seen as itsso(e "ause and the movement had some s'e"i$i" "auses #hi"h )ave it a 'e"u(iar "hara"ter&;ust (ike the O'ium #ars* It is in $a"t more "orre"t to say that the Tai'in) #as a "ause o$3an"hu dynasti" de"(ine rather than vi"e versa*

There#ereanum%er o$internal factors#hi"h're"i'itatedtheTai'in)movement*Amon) these #as the sta))erin) rise in China+s 'o'u(ation* The 01 years o$ 'ea"e and'ros'erity under the 3an"hus sa# an in"rease in the 'o'u(ation %et#een ?@ and/01A #hi(e there #as no "orres'ondin) rise in ara%(e (and %et#een 22 and/BBA* There #as a(so the rise in "ommodity 'ri"es& the virtua( e5haustion o$ the su''(yo$ne#(and& theruino$sma(( (andho(ders%y$ra)mentationo$inheritan"e(eadin)totremendous de%t and tenan"y amon) the 'easantry* By the se"ond ha($ o$ the !th "entury&21> o$ the 'eo'(e in China had no (and* This in turn (ed to "on"entration o$ (and in thehands o$ the ru(in) e(ite& and the "onse.uent dis'(a"ement o$ the 'easantry $rom the rura(areas& 'rovidin) ready materia( $or the movement* The stagnation) inefficienc() corruption and demorali*ation in the Manchuadministration a(on) #ith the humi(iation o$ de$eat in the First O'ium 7ar& a(so (ed to a)enera( $ee(in) o$ dissatis$a"tion #ith the 3an"hus* One "an a(so 'oint to thein"reasin)(y a))ressiveChristian conversionsand 'rea"hin)& ethni" riva(ries& and theseries o$ natura( "a(amites& su"h as the famines in Henan in /@?& in the midd(e Yan)tCe%asin in /@! and in Hunan around /01& as "auses or "ontri%utory $a"tors $or the Tai'in)movement* Po(iti"o9mi(itary$a"tors addedtothe )ro#in)$ee(in) o$ inse"urityanddis"ontent* The%ureau"rati"ma"hinehad%e"omeso"orru't andine$$i"ient that the'u%(i" #orks deteriorated* In /0=9B $or e5am'(e& ne)(e"ted dykes "aused the &uangheto +urst its %anks in the re)ion o$ 4ai$en)* The river "han)ed "ourse to $(o# into the seanorth o$theShandon) 'eninsu(a& /11 ki(ometers $romitsmouth& andvast areas #eredevastated*Another ma;or $a"tor #as the effects of the ,pium wars. The First O'ium 7ar and itssu%se.uent treaties in"reased 'ro%(ems& #ith (ootin) %y the $orei)n invaders& a heavy #arindemnity& #orsenin) o$ o'ium smu))(in) and a massive in$(u5 o$ $orei)n )oods* The"risis #as a""entuated %y the "urren"y and $is"a( 'ro%(em "reated %y the im'a"t o$ the#est* Throu)hout the !th"entury $orei)n im'orts& es'e"ia((y o'ium ke't on in"reasin)&"ausin) a hu)e out$(o# o$ si(ver $rom China* This in turn resu(ted in a "han)e in theinterna( va(ue o$ si(ver to "o''er $rom D= to DB* This a))ravated the $inan"ia( 'ro%(emso$theChinese'easantry& #hoseta5esandrents#ere"a("u(atedinsi(ver%ut #hosein"ome#as%asedondeva(ued"o''er* A(sotheune.ua( treatiesin"(udin)"(auseso$heavy indemnities di"tated %y the $orei)n 'o#ers on(y added to the ta5 %urden that had%e"ome un%eara%(e* Anotherim'ortant e$$e"t o$theO'ium#ars#asashiftinthetradingcentrefromCanton to -hanghai& (eavin) thousands unem'(oyed in Canton* Former trans'ortation#orkers "onne"ted #ith the shi'ment o$ tea and si(k #ere thro#n out o$ #ork* In thisre)ion a distin"tion )re# %et#een the 6natives+ * This de%ate ho#ever is not reso(va%(e and #hi(e the e5isten"e o$ a radi"a( 'easant'ro)ramme"annot %edenied& it is a(soseenthat the'easant hadthenotiono$ the%enevo(ent a%so(utism o$ the kin) and the radi"a(ism may or may not have trans(ated intoa"tion* Therearea$e#other $a"tors that "an%e"onsidered#ithre)ardtotheanti9$euda("hara"ter o$theTai'in)movement* First(ytheir (andre$orms& #hi"hnomatter ho#(imited(y a''(ied& #ere hi)h(y anti9$euda(J %esides the $a"t that in some Tai'in) areas&tenants a"tua((y sto''ed 'ayin) rents* Se"ond(y& the $(eein) o$ a (ar)e num%er o$(and(ords in $ear o$ the Tai'in) ons(au)ht (ed to their (ar)e (andho(din)s $a((in) into the'easants+ hands& a(on) #ith many tem'(e (ands* Third(y& de"rees #ere 'assed to atta"k the$euda( e(ite&su"h as orders to surrender )rains& 're"ious stones and meta(s& et"* to theTai'in) storehouses* 8ast(y& the $a"t remains that most o$ the Tai'in) (eaders& and a(mosta(( o$ the mass $o((o#in)& #ere dra#n $rom 'easant sto"k& thou)h not e5"(usive(y* 7hen (ookin) at the nature o$ the Tai'in) #e a(so "annot i)nore itsanti-esta+lishment nature* The em'eror o$ China a""ordin) to the Tai'in)'ro"(amation#asakeensu''ortero$the$euda( system* Thus& theem'eror#hohadhitherto%eenseenasa%ornsa)e#asno#"a((ed6The3onster4in)o$He((+*They%e(ievedthat $or thousands o$ years thes'irit o$ the'eo'(ehad%eentorturedand'erse"uted* Con$u"ius& #ho had %een the su'reme tea"her o$ China& #as de"ried %y theTai'in) $o((o#ers* They )athered the "oura)e to "a(( the Four C(assi"s and the Five GreatBooks o$ Con$u"ius %ooks o$ sor"ery and $euda( ideas* Thus& in many #ays the Tai'in)"an %e "a((ed a cultural revolution& as the (ater revo(utions in China tar)eted these verythin)s* 2Another de%ate on the nature o$ the Tai'in) movement& is re)ardin) itsanti-imperialist character* This is an e5treme(y "om'(e5 .uestion i$ one (ooks at theideo(o)i"a( as'e"ts o$ the Tai'in) $orei)n out(ook* 7hi(e they #ere $ar removed $rom the"on"e't o$-ino-centrism& $orei)ners #ere sti(( "a((ed de'endents* One "an reasona%(ysay that #hi(e %ein) anti9im'eria(ist& the Tai'in)s #ere de$inite(y not 6enopho+ic& and#erein$a"t .uitepro-foreign* They#ere$as"inated%yvarious as'e"ts o$ $orei)nthou)ht& and #e("omed $orei)ners to (earn $rom them #hatever #as 'ositiveJ they #antedre$orm in Chinese 'o(ity& so"iety and e"onomy throu)h this (earnin) $rom the 7est* TheTai'in)s 'ro'a)ated $ree trade and #e("omed $orei)n missionaries #ith )reat Cea( andhad )reat admiration $or #estern te"hno(o)y and as #e have seen they even %orro#ed"ertain tenets $rom Christianity* They #e("omed the 'ositive as'e"ts o$ #estern in$(uen"esu"h as edu"ation and s"ien"e* It is a si)n o$ maturity o$ the Tai'in) movement& that ins'ite o$ su"h stron) 'ositive in$(uen"es& they "ou(d sti((oppose western goodsand the"om'etition they 'osed* Thus& it is remarka%(e that this o'enness did not su""um% to an6a""e'tan"e o$ im'eria( a"tivity+*They "ontinued to o''ose #estern intrusion and $reetradenevermeante5'(oitationtothem*Hen"e they "ondemnedthe#esterners ;ust asmu"h as they a""e'ted their 'ositive 'oints* This sur$a"e "ordia(ity ho#ever had a (ot o$"ontradi"tions %eneath it* The Tai'in) a(#ays sou)ht to e5tend the idea o$ e)a(itarianisminthes'hereo$ internationa( re(ations* Behindtheo'ennessto#ardsthe#est (aya"ertain desire to %e"ome (ike that and emu(ate it* For anun%iasedandsoundassessment o$ theTai'in)movement #eneedtodoathorou)h ana(ysis o$four +asic aspects of the movement @itso+Aectives) their implementation) participation in themovement and its result or legac(. As #e have noteda%ove& the Tai'in)s haddefinite aimsanda de$inite ideo(o)y*Irres'e"tive o$ its im'(ementation&it envisioned not on(y an overthro# o$ the 3an"hudynasty& %ut a(so the esta%(ishment o$ a ne#so"io9e"onomi" and re(i)ious order*Egalitarianism #as its "ore 'rin"i'(e and #as re$(e"ted in its so"ia( as #e(( as e"onomi"'ro)rammes* 7ith re)ard to implementation ho#ever #e see that the Tai'in) ideo(o)y #as not %y and(ar)e a"tua(iCed* The entire Tai'in) system #as too "om'(e5& and the 'ro)rammes had auto'ian"hara"ter* Furthermoretheyre.uiredsta%i(ityand'ea"eto%eim'(ementedJneither o$ #hi"h the Tai'in)s had* As time 'assed& the e$$e"tiveness o$ the 'ro)rammesa(so%e"ame dou%t$u(* Di$$eren"es inas'irations& motives andideo(o)y%et#eentheori)ina( nu"(euso$the(eadershi'& andthemass%aseo$themovement #orsenedthesituation* The5and 4rogramme was implemented in limited areas& most(y in southern'rovin"es su"h as 4#an)si and in the Tai'in) "a'ita( o$ Nankin)* Im'(ementation #asdi$$i"u(t in the 'revai(in) "onditions o$ shi$tin) %oundaries and $re.uent "(ashes* No rent#as taken $rom the 'easants in these areas and ta6 'ayments #ere "ut %y 01>* There iseviden"e o$ landlords $rom the (o#er Yan)tCe va((ey area $(eein) to Shan)hai #hen their?'re"ious meta( and sur'(us #as "on$is"ated* Ho#ever& the ne#(y a".uired (and #as notredistri%uted and the Tai'in) (eaders amassed )reat #ea(th* The (and(ords+ (ands #ere nota(#ays "on$is"ated in Tai'in) Cones* Furthermore& the Tai'in) (eaders starteda""umu(atin)(andandthemse(veso$ten%e"amethene#(and(ords* The'rea"hin)o$"hastity#asa""om'anied%ythekee'in)o$"on"u%ines%ymanyo$the(eaders*Theemancipationof women#asho#ever tru(ya"hievedand#omenen;oyedthesamee"onomi"and'o(iti"a( o''ortunities as men* Themi(itaryor)aniCationtooin"(uded#omen*7omena(soo""u'ied%ureau"rati"'osts& #erehorse%a"kridersand#ereno(on)er su%;e"ted to an in$erior so"ia( status*4rohi+ition of opium#as a(so e$$e"tive(y"arried out* The issue o$ 'arti"i'ation in the Tai'in) movement is (ar)e(y (inked to the.uestion o$ its 'easant or 6anti9$euda(+ identity* It shou(d %e noted thou)h that #hi(e the'o'u(ar %ase o$ the Tai'in) movement #as the 'easantry& the Tai'in) (eadershi'es'e"ia((y #as de$inite(y not e5"(usive(y 'easant in "hara"ter* 8ast(y& #e a(so need to "onsider the legac( or resulto$ the Tai'in) movement*Bn theimmediate sense) des'ite its (imited a"hievements& the Tai'in) movement #as a failure*The im'ressive mi(itary or)aniCation o$ the Tai'in)s #as una%(e to dis(od)e the3an"hus* The (eadershi' $a"tiona(iCed& 'arti"u(ar(y a$ter /02& #eakenin) the im'a"t o$themovement* Ironi"a((y& 3an"hu'o#er #as re'(a"ed%ytheTai'in)s& #hi"h#asprovincial not centrali*ed& and de$inite(y not authoritarian* The Tai'in) (eaders a(so (ost'o'u(ar su''ort onideo(o)i"a( )rounds* Theanti93an"hua''ea( o$ theTai'in)#as"ause #as "om'romised %y its Christian ideo(o)y* H)a(itarian 'rin"i'(es as #e(( as thedestruction of ancient templesresu(ted in the (oss o$ su''ort o$ the traditiona(orthodo5y* Bn the long run the movement hastened the 'ro"ess o$ dynasti" 'o(iti"a( disinte)ration*The 'hysi"a( dama)e #as tremendous , hundreds of towns and cites were destro(ed&and %et#een C# and %# million people were .illed* Po#er )ravitated into the hands o$(o"a( stron) men& 'arti"u(ar(y 'rovin"ia( )overnors& (eadin) to the rise o$ re)iona(ism in(ater years* The movement a$$e"ted China economicall( a(so* It 'revented ta5 "o((e"tionin many o$ the ri"hest 'rovin"es* Ne# ta5es had to %e devised to 'ay the e5'enses o$su''ressionJ o$ these& likin& the interna( transit ta5 (evied on "ommodities in "hina #as themost im'ortant*The most im'ortant in$(uen"e o$ the Tai'in) movement iscultural* The Tai'in)movement remained hi)h(y 'o'u(ar in Chinese tradition* Survivors o$ the :Great Pea"eFen;oyed "onsidera%(e 'resti)e amon) the 'easants and ke't its memory a(ive* Fore5am'(e& -un ?at--en #as )reat(y stirred as a "hi(d %y the stories o$ his un"(e& #ho had%e(on)ed to the Tai'in)* The movement initiated a "entury o$ re%e((ions and revo(utions*The 'o(iti"a(& e"onomi"& so"ia( and "u(tura( re$orms it attem'ted #ere mode(s $or (aterattem'ts o$ the Chinese Im'eria( administration& and even the Communist Revo(ution* This %rin)s us to the .uestion o$whether or not the Taiping was aprecursor to the Communist movement of the C#th centur(. The (inkso$the Tai'in)s#iththe(ater"ommunist movement #erea"kno#(ed)ed%yMao TseTung #ho a(#ays 6$e(t inde%ted to the Tai'in)+ as they tru(y re'resented a revo(utionary/'ro)ramme* Certain'oints#ithintheTai'in)"an%emadeinthisre)ard* BoththeTai'in) and the Communists #ere modernists in nature* Sudden im'a"t o$ the #est ands"ienti$i"& te"hno(o)i"a( and so"ia( advan"es had their in$(uen"e on the ideo(o)y o$ theTai'in)s* In the same #ay& the Communists 'rovided a modern and 'ra"ti"a( 'hi(oso'hy#ith#hi"htoreAect +oththe traditions of the Chinesepast andtheWesterndomination of the present. The Tai'in) 'resented a "oherent 'ro)ramme o$ agrarian communismand the 3aoist'ro)ramme o$ "o((e"tive o#nershi' "an %e seen as o#in) its ori)ins to this* Se"ond(y& the'rin"i'(es o$social egalitarianisma(so in"(uded e.ua(ity o$ the se5es& #as a(sosomethin) that 3ao es'oused* Third(y& %oth #ere anti-imperialist in nature* Fourth(y&there is the $a"t that 3ao#as seekin)to%ui(da histori"a( tra;e"tory$or %ui(din)"ommunism in a 'rimari(y a)rarian "ountry and so the "on"e'tion o$ su"h a (ink #ith theTai'in) "an %e seen as a de(i%erate attem't to "onstru"t a history o$ the movement& sin"e3ao #anted to %reak a#ay $rom the mode(s o$ "ommunism that had %een s'read in other'arts o$ the #or(d* Ho#ever thereareother as'e"tsthat one"annot i)noreandthenoneseesthe%asi"difference that the Taiping have from the communists.The (and 'ro)ramme o$ theTai'in) $or instan"e& resem%(ed that o$ the "ommunists inso$ar as o#nershi' #as"o((e"tive* But the+asicunittheye5'ound#asthe$ami(yandnot the"ommunity*Se"ond(y& (and distri%ution #as sou)ht to %e e.ua(iCed& %ut no mention o$landredistri+ution #as made* The third thin) that distan"es the Tai'in) $rom the "ommunistmovement is that 3ar5ismenvisionsaclassless societ(andultimatel(astatelesssociet( too. The Tai'in)s on the other hand never distan"ed themse(ves $rom the "on"e'to$ a%so(ute %enevo(ent ru(e* The o''osition to monar"hy #as not on(y (imited& %ut a(sosu'er$i"ia(*Another di$$eren"e %et#een the Communist Chinese historians+ and the #estern s"ho(ar(ya''raisa(s o$ the Tai'in) movement #as in their di$$erent spiritual outloo.s* Communists"ho(ars have ar)ued that (ike the revo(ution that trans$ormed China even the Tai'in) didnot 'ossessanyre(i)ionandinsteadthey%e(ievedina"(ass(essuto'ia* Thou)htheCommunists mi)ht try to do#n'(ay the im'ortan"e o$ re(i)ion& s"ho(ars (ike Jen Yu97enta(k dee'(y a%out the re(i)ious nature and the Christian )round o$ Tai'in) idea(ism& #hi(eothers (ike Fan 7en(an s'eak o$ the Protestant (ink to the O'ium #ars and the Tai'in)*Hen"e& even thou)h the !@! revo(ution and its 'ioneer 3ao denied the e5isten"e o$ God&the Tai'in)s did not think so* One "an 'oint out that the Tai'in)s had severa( su"h as'e"tsthat ran "ontrary to the 3aoist revo(utionary 'ro)ramme* In "on"(usion& one "an say that %oth the terms o$ a $u((9$(ed)ed revo(ution and a merere%e((ion are too e5treme* It shou(d %e noted that %oth the Chinese "ommunist historiansand#esterns"ho(arsa)reeontheuni.ue"hara"ter o$theTai'in)movement andits$ai(ure* The di$$eren"e %et#een the t#o (ies in their a''roa"h* Advo"ates o$ itsrevo(utionary "hara"ter $o"us on its 'ro)rammes and 'o(i"ies& #hi(e those #ho see it as a'easant insurre"tion em'hasiCe its (a"k o$ im'(ementation and (eadershi'*The Tai'in)movement dared $or the $irst time to "ha((en)e and atta"k a system #hi"h had 'revai(ed!inChina $or "enturies* 3ore thananyother re%e((iono$ their day& theyaddressedthemse(ves dire"t(y to the "risis o$ the times and o$$ered "on"rete measures $or reso(vin)it* Their vision o$ a ne# system o$ 'ro'erty re(ations& a ne# me"hanism o$ (o"a( "ontro(&and a ne# re(ationshi' %et#een the individua( and the state #as an authenti" res'onse tothe distin"tive 'ro%(ems o$ the (ate im'eria( a)e* And so to redu"e the Tai'in)historio)ra'hy to .uestions o$ dynasti" de"(ine and revo(ution or re%e((ion de%ates doesnot do ;usti"e to the Tai'in) and the %a"k)round $rom #hi"h it emer)ed* DBD5B,/8;4&? John 4* Fair%ank , Hast Asia Jean Chesneau5 , China $rom the O'ium 7ars to ! Revo(ution Pekin) Forei)n 8an)ua)es Press , The Tai'in) Revo(ution Tan Chun) , Triton and Dra)on FranC 3i"hae( and GH Tay(or , Far Hast and the 3odern 7or(d S*Y* Ten) , Tai'in) Re%e((ion and the 7estern Po#ers1