talk on critical appraisal 17.08.11
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
1/22
An introduction toCritical Appraisal for Psychiatry
Wednesday 17thAug 2011In an Academic Meeting at Department of Psychiatry,
Eastbourne District General Hospital
Akira NAITO MD PhD
CT1 to Dr. A. GALEA
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
2/22
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
3/22
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)
Definition ofEvidence Based Medicine:
The conscientious, explicit and judicious use of
current best evidence in making decisions about the
care of patients (Sackett et all 2000)
The goal ofEBPis the integration of:
1.Clinical expertise
2.Scientific evidence, and
3.Client/patient/caregiver values
3
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
4/22
Information solutions
Useful sources of information for clinical practice
The Cochrane Library: http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/
The Evidence-Based Mental Health (EBMH):
http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/publications/journals/ebmhinfo1.aspx
Other internet resources
Clinical Evidence: http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com
PubMed(MEDLINE): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE):http://www.nice.org.uk/
4
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
5/22
Why doing critical appraisal?
Uncertainty is universal in clinical medicine.
It takes practice to routinely identify areas of
uncertainty and to ask clinical questions in aproductive way.
Such questions will be brief summaries of the
clinical scenario and the information required,constructed in a way that makes searching
for evidence likely to succeed.
5
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
6/22
Different types of question require
different study designs Aetiology: What caused this illness? Cross-sectional surveys
Diagnosis:
What does this test result mean?
RCTs Prognosis:
What is likely to happen? Inception cohort studies
Harm:
Is being exposed to it likely to do harm? RCTs Effectiveness of therapy/treatment:
Is this treatment likely to help? RCTs
Qualitative:
What are the outcomes that are most important? 6
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
7/22
Evidence levels (from NICE)
Ia. Systematic review / Meta-analysis of RCTs
Ib. Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT)
IIa. Non-randomised controlled study
IIb. Quasi-experimental study
III. Non-experimental descriptive study
Comparative studies, Correlation studies
Case controlled studies
IV. Clinical experience
Expert-committee reports or opinions
Evidence from expected authorities7
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
8/22
Main types of bias
Selection bias Sampling / Performance bias
non-representative identification/recruitment of subjects
Unequal provision of care apart from treatment under evaluation
Response/ Attrition bias (non-/late- responders) unrepresentative participation differs from responders
Biased occurrence and loss to follow up
Observation / Detection bias Interviewer bias (blind to subject status or not):
differential data recording in subject groups by researcher
Recall bias historical data is selectively filtered
Confounding correlations/associations (not causal links)
8
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
9/22
What is critical appraisal?
The process by which a reader can assess
whether a written material possesses:
V
alidity(Is it close to the truth?), andApplicability(Is it clinically useful?).
The process of carefully & systematically
examining research to judge its:
Trustworthiness, and
Value and Relevance in a particular context.
9
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
10/22
Common ground inquiries
1. Is the study/research/guideline valid?
Validity / Trustworthiness
(Internal validity = free/minimum bias)
2. What does it show? & Is it important?
Value and Relevance
3. Can I use this in caring for my patients?
Applicability(for ones own decision making)
10
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
11/22
Structure of a paper
Introduction/Background
Clinical importance (Why do the study?)
A review of previous work in the subject area Hypotheses to be tested: a null hypothesis
Methods Results
Discussion / Conclusions
11
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
12/22
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
13/22
Results
Check whether original research question
or hypothesis was properly assessed?
Appropriate tables and figures? Logical manner?
Key findings?
Any inconsistencies in the data?
13
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
14/22
Discussion / Conclusions
Value and relevance of the study results
Limitations of the study
Implications of the studys findings
Generalisability of positive findings
Implication of negative results
14
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
15/22
Any question so far?
(References for writing a paper)
Writing a case report
http://careerfocus.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/327/7424/2153-a
Tips andC
heck-points f
or academic writing in Englishhttp://homepage2.nifty.com/akira_naito/english.doc
Using English for Academic Purposes
http://www.uefap.com/writing/writfram.htm
15
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
16/22
Example questions
for therapy/treatment articles
16
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
17/22
What question did the study ask?+ PICO
Patients
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome(s)
17
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
18/22
Are the results of the trial valid?
Was the assignment of patients to treatments
randomised?
Were the groups similar at the start of the trial?
Aside from the allocated treatment, were groups
treated equally?
Were all patients who entered the trial
accounted for? and were they analysed in thegroups to which they were randomised?
Were measures objective or were the patients
and clinicians kept blind to which treatment
was being received? 18
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
19/22
What were the results?
How large was the treatment effect?
Relative Risk (RR)
Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) Number Needed to Treat (NNT) = 1 / ARR
Coefficient of Intra-Cluster Correlation (ICC)
How precise was the estimate of the
treatment effect?
(confidence intervals for each estimate)
19
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
20/22
Will the results help me in caringfor my patient?
The questions that you should ask before
you decide to apply the results of the study
to your patient are:
Is my patient so different to those in the study
that the results cannot apply?
Is the treatment feasible in my setting?
Will the potential benefits of treatmentoutweigh the potential harms of treatment for
my patient?
20
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
21/22
References
EBM Tools for Critical Appraisal
http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1157
What is critical appraisal?
http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/What_is_critical_appraisal.pdf
EBP tutorials - Critical Appraisal Skills
http://www.brighton.ac.uk/ncor/tutorials/EBP_Tutorial_intro_Critical_Appraisal_Skills.pdf
Clinical Study Design and Methods Terminologyhttp://www.vetmed.wsu.edu/courses-jmgay/glossclinstudy.htm
Critical Appraisal for Psychiatry (MRCPsych Guides)
http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/0443070172
21
-
8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11
22/22