talk on critical appraisal 17.08.11

Upload: akira-naito

Post on 07-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    1/22

    An introduction toCritical Appraisal for Psychiatry

    Wednesday 17thAug 2011In an Academic Meeting at Department of Psychiatry,

    Eastbourne District General Hospital

    Akira NAITO MD PhD

    CT1 to Dr. A. GALEA

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    2/22

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    3/22

    Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)

    Definition ofEvidence Based Medicine:

    The conscientious, explicit and judicious use of

    current best evidence in making decisions about the

    care of patients (Sackett et all 2000)

    The goal ofEBPis the integration of:

    1.Clinical expertise

    2.Scientific evidence, and

    3.Client/patient/caregiver values

    3

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    4/22

    Information solutions

    Useful sources of information for clinical practice

    The Cochrane Library: http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/

    The Evidence-Based Mental Health (EBMH):

    http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/publications/journals/ebmhinfo1.aspx

    Other internet resources

    Clinical Evidence: http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com

    PubMed(MEDLINE): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

    National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE):http://www.nice.org.uk/

    4

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    5/22

    Why doing critical appraisal?

    Uncertainty is universal in clinical medicine.

    It takes practice to routinely identify areas of

    uncertainty and to ask clinical questions in aproductive way.

    Such questions will be brief summaries of the

    clinical scenario and the information required,constructed in a way that makes searching

    for evidence likely to succeed.

    5

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    6/22

    Different types of question require

    different study designs Aetiology: What caused this illness? Cross-sectional surveys

    Diagnosis:

    What does this test result mean?

    RCTs Prognosis:

    What is likely to happen? Inception cohort studies

    Harm:

    Is being exposed to it likely to do harm? RCTs Effectiveness of therapy/treatment:

    Is this treatment likely to help? RCTs

    Qualitative:

    What are the outcomes that are most important? 6

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    7/22

    Evidence levels (from NICE)

    Ia. Systematic review / Meta-analysis of RCTs

    Ib. Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT)

    IIa. Non-randomised controlled study

    IIb. Quasi-experimental study

    III. Non-experimental descriptive study

    Comparative studies, Correlation studies

    Case controlled studies

    IV. Clinical experience

    Expert-committee reports or opinions

    Evidence from expected authorities7

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    8/22

    Main types of bias

    Selection bias Sampling / Performance bias

    non-representative identification/recruitment of subjects

    Unequal provision of care apart from treatment under evaluation

    Response/ Attrition bias (non-/late- responders) unrepresentative participation differs from responders

    Biased occurrence and loss to follow up

    Observation / Detection bias Interviewer bias (blind to subject status or not):

    differential data recording in subject groups by researcher

    Recall bias historical data is selectively filtered

    Confounding correlations/associations (not causal links)

    8

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    9/22

    What is critical appraisal?

    The process by which a reader can assess

    whether a written material possesses:

    V

    alidity(Is it close to the truth?), andApplicability(Is it clinically useful?).

    The process of carefully & systematically

    examining research to judge its:

    Trustworthiness, and

    Value and Relevance in a particular context.

    9

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    10/22

    Common ground inquiries

    1. Is the study/research/guideline valid?

    Validity / Trustworthiness

    (Internal validity = free/minimum bias)

    2. What does it show? & Is it important?

    Value and Relevance

    3. Can I use this in caring for my patients?

    Applicability(for ones own decision making)

    10

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    11/22

    Structure of a paper

    Introduction/Background

    Clinical importance (Why do the study?)

    A review of previous work in the subject area Hypotheses to be tested: a null hypothesis

    Methods Results

    Discussion / Conclusions

    11

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    12/22

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    13/22

    Results

    Check whether original research question

    or hypothesis was properly assessed?

    Appropriate tables and figures? Logical manner?

    Key findings?

    Any inconsistencies in the data?

    13

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    14/22

    Discussion / Conclusions

    Value and relevance of the study results

    Limitations of the study

    Implications of the studys findings

    Generalisability of positive findings

    Implication of negative results

    14

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    15/22

    Any question so far?

    (References for writing a paper)

    Writing a case report

    http://careerfocus.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/327/7424/2153-a

    Tips andC

    heck-points f

    or academic writing in Englishhttp://homepage2.nifty.com/akira_naito/english.doc

    Using English for Academic Purposes

    http://www.uefap.com/writing/writfram.htm

    15

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    16/22

    Example questions

    for therapy/treatment articles

    16

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    17/22

    What question did the study ask?+ PICO

    Patients

    Intervention

    Comparison

    Outcome(s)

    17

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    18/22

    Are the results of the trial valid?

    Was the assignment of patients to treatments

    randomised?

    Were the groups similar at the start of the trial?

    Aside from the allocated treatment, were groups

    treated equally?

    Were all patients who entered the trial

    accounted for? and were they analysed in thegroups to which they were randomised?

    Were measures objective or were the patients

    and clinicians kept blind to which treatment

    was being received? 18

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    19/22

    What were the results?

    How large was the treatment effect?

    Relative Risk (RR)

    Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) Number Needed to Treat (NNT) = 1 / ARR

    Coefficient of Intra-Cluster Correlation (ICC)

    How precise was the estimate of the

    treatment effect?

    (confidence intervals for each estimate)

    19

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    20/22

    Will the results help me in caringfor my patient?

    The questions that you should ask before

    you decide to apply the results of the study

    to your patient are:

    Is my patient so different to those in the study

    that the results cannot apply?

    Is the treatment feasible in my setting?

    Will the potential benefits of treatmentoutweigh the potential harms of treatment for

    my patient?

    20

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    21/22

    References

    EBM Tools for Critical Appraisal

    http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1157

    What is critical appraisal?

    http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/What_is_critical_appraisal.pdf

    EBP tutorials - Critical Appraisal Skills

    http://www.brighton.ac.uk/ncor/tutorials/EBP_Tutorial_intro_Critical_Appraisal_Skills.pdf

    Clinical Study Design and Methods Terminologyhttp://www.vetmed.wsu.edu/courses-jmgay/glossclinstudy.htm

    Critical Appraisal for Psychiatry (MRCPsych Guides)

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/0443070172

    21

  • 8/6/2019 Talk on Critical Appraisal 17.08.11

    22/22