talking evidence based radiology
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Talking “Evidence based Radiology “
Dr/Ahmed BahnassyConsultant Radiologist
![Page 2: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Time :Thursday at mid night
• Obese old primigravida ,diabetic ,16 weeks gestation(post artificial insemination and follicular stimulation),presenting to A&E with severe abdominal pain (Right lower quadrant).
• Leucocytic count is borderline .• The physician is stuck and asking for your
help …
![Page 3: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Eminence-based vs. Evidence-based Radiology
• “Eminence-based radiology” = based on the belief that an expert with a practice devoted to a particular discipline can amass sufficient experience to determine the best approach to clinical imaging problems
• “Evidence-based radiology” = based on the understanding that an individual's experience is biased by practice mix, overemphasis of more recent events, small sample size, and lack of objectivity
• Accordingly, best practice should be based on well-designed and well-performed medical research
![Page 4: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Other types of medicine ?!• Private based medicine ..• Medicolegal based
medicine.• Elusive based medicine .
![Page 5: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What is Evidence-Based Medicine?
“Evidence-Based Medicine is the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values”.
Dave Sackett • Obese.
• Old primi• After costly
intervention.• Second
trimester.
Patient Concerns
Clinical Expertise
Best research evidence
EBM
![Page 6: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Definition of EBM:-
It is the process of systematically reviewing, appraising and using clinical research findings to aid the delivery of optimum clinical care to patients
Rosenberg W, Donald A. BMJ 1995; 310: 1122–1126
![Page 7: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SO,
The practice of Evidence-Based Medicine is a process of lifelong, self-directed, problem-based learning.
![Page 8: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The history of EBM:-
• In 1972 Professor Archie Cochrane a British epidemiologist ,, expressed what later came to be known as evidence-based medicine (EBM).
• Cochrane proposed that all the best clinical trials should be systematically reviewed, specialty by specialty. This lead to the development of the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews.
• These concepts were developed into a practical methodology by groups working at Duke University in North Carolina and McMaster University in Toronto in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
![Page 9: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The history of EBM (Cont.):-
• In 1992, the UK government funded the establishment of the Cochrane Centre in Oxford, with the objective to facilitate the preparation of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials of healthcare.
• The following year it expanded into an international collaboration of centers, whose role is to co-ordinate the activities of thousands of researchers.
• JAMA 1992; 268: 2420–2425.• Eddy DM. JAMA 1990; 263: 1265, 1269, 1272 passim.• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. BMJ 1996; 312: 71–72.
![Page 10: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
What is Evidence based Radiology
• It is important for radiologists to realize that EBR offers solution that can be applied at many levels of professional involvement.
• A unique feature of EBR is that it can be used readily by practicing radiologists working at the effectiveness level: performance in their own departments under ordinary, rather than ideal conditions.
![Page 11: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
How to practice EBM?
EBM practice requires 5 As:• Asking• Acquiring• Appraising• Applying• Assessing
Sharon E. Straus
![Page 12: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The 5 As
• Ask clinical question: convert information needs into a clearly defined
answerable question,
• Acquire the evidence: conduct a systematic search for the best available
evidence for the problem,
• Appraise the evidence: evaluate the validity and applicability of the evidence,
• Apply the evidence: prepare synthesis or summary of the evidence for
decision making and implement in practice,
• Assess your performance.
![Page 13: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
1. Ask clinical question
What makes a clinical question well built?
Phrase the question for a precise answer. To achieve this, formulate an answerable question, including:
• Population or disease state
• Intervention
• Comparison
• Outcome
![Page 14: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
PICO/PIO • Population/Patients: pregnant women in
abdominal pain
• Intervention: Imaging
• Comparison: none (PIO )
• Outcome(s): accuracy of imaging modalities.
![Page 16: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Another formulation
In pregnant women suffering of abdominal pain ,what is the comparative value of ultrasound ,CT and MRI .. findings ..?
‘Answerable questions are the backbone of practicing EBM’
![Page 17: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Radiological considerations
• Obesity.• Precious baby ..radiation concern.• Accurate diagnosis.• Available equipments .
![Page 18: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
How to search
• For primary sources, the free sites used bymost people are PubMed (available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Pubmed; and Grateful Med (available at:igm.nlm.nih.gov.
• Subscription-based search programs includeOvid (available at: www.ovid.com; and Silver Platter (availableat: www.silverplatter.com; • Radiology journals onlineinclude the RSNA Index to Imaging Literature(available at: rsnaindex.rsnajnls.org; • Radiology Online (availableat: radiology.rsnajnls.org; and the American Journal ofRoentgenology (www.ajr.com )
![Page 19: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Start up
• Start Explorer and enter– www.pubmed.gov
• Put on CAPS lock– So that AND and OR are in CAPITALS
![Page 20: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Abstracts Vs full text .
• Print single most relevant abstract for each question – for both ‘set’ questions and your own questions.
• Full text articles can also be downloaded from pubmed or ovid (radiographics ,Radiology ,AJR ..rarely BJR …)
![Page 21: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
3- Appraise the evidence (Critical appraisal):
This is a method of assessing and interpreting the evidence by systematically considering its validity, results and relevance to the area of work considered, and classify it according to the
strength of evidence.
![Page 22: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Levels of evidence in Radiology (simplified)
![Page 24: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
.Hierarchical Model of Efficacy
![Page 25: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• Sensitivity• Ability to detect
disease• number of corective
+ve/number with disease.
• TP/D+
• Specificity• Ability to identify
absence of disease.• Probability of having
–ve test given no disease.
• TN/D-
![Page 27: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Is the test helpful (valid)?The Youden Index
• Youden Index = sensitivity+specificity-1– For a test to be useful, then
• sensitivity + specificity - 1 (Youden Index > 0)
• Examples:– Coin Toss with +ve = "heads"
sensitivity = 0.5 specificity = 0.5 – Youden = 0
![Page 28: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
• PPV• Possibility of +ve test
to identify presence of disease.
• Correct +ve/Number of positive tests.
• T+ve/T+
• NPV• Possibility of –ve test
to identify absence of disease.
• TN/T-
![Page 29: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Likelihood Ratios//LR+..LR-LRpos = sensitivity/( 1 - specificity) LRneg = (1- sensitivity)/specificity.
A positive likelihood ratio greater than 10 and a negative likelihood ratio less than 0.1 provide “convincing” diagnostic evidence;
while a positive likelihood ratio greater than 5 and a negative
likelihood ratio less than 0.2 provide “strong” diagnostic evidence
![Page 30: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Can a test rule-in or rule-out?
• SpPln– Specific test, Positive rules In
eg: Rovsing's sign, ST elevation > 2mm• SnNout
– Sensitive test, Negative rules Outeg: Erect abdominal film for obstruction,
![Page 31: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
EBM and Systematic Review• EBM (quick )• Steps
– Answerable Question– Search– Appraise
– Apply
• Time: 90 seconds• < 20 articles.
• Systematic Review• Steps
– Answerable Question– Search ++++– Appraise – Synthesize– Apply
• Time: 6 months• < 2,000 articles
![Page 32: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
What is a meta-analysis?
Optional part of a systematic review
Systematic reviews
Meta-analyses
![Page 33: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The following is concluded after appraisal of litterature.
In an initial series of 42 pregnant patients inwhom US was used for detection of acute
appendicitis:100% sensitivity, 96% specificity, and98% accuracy were reported.Another study of 22 pregnant patients (all in
the first and second trimesters) reported 66% sensitivity and 95% specificity .
![Page 36: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
• Despite the variable sensitivity, US is still recommended as a first-line test..
• lack of radiation ,alternative diagnosis ,etc…
![Page 37: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
• A very recent series included 51 pregnant patients• suspected to have appendicitis . • MR imaging had an overall sensitivity• of 100%, specificity of 93.6%, and accuracy of
94%. (what is the protocol )• The authors concluded that MR imaging should
be used to exclude acute appendicitis in pregnant women suspected to have appendicitis but with inconclusive US results.
Pedrosa I, Zeikus EA, Levine D, Rofsky NM.MR imaging of acute right lower quadrant pain inpregnant and nopregnant patients. RadioGraphics2007;27:721–753.
![Page 38: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
• A very recent retrospective study comprising• 78 pregnant women with abdominal pain reported• a 92% sensitivity, 99% specificity, and• 99% negative predictive value of abdominal and• pelvic CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis .• Therefore, if MR imaging cannot be performed• (contraindicated or not available), CT of the abdomen• and pelvis should be used as a second-line• test.
![Page 39: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
• encourage more avid efforts to keep the radiation dose as low as possible (eg, by decreasing the milliampere-seconds value, using z-axis modulation, and increasing the pitch )
the risk of malformations is significantly increased above control levels at doses above 15 rad (0.15 Gy)
![Page 40: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
What about Contrast Material ?
• Iodinated Contrast:– Category B drugs; that is, animal reproduction
studies have not demonstrated a fetal risk,• Gadolinium Contrast
– Animal studies show growth retardation and congenital anomalies with doses 2-7x normal human dose
![Page 41: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
The final answer
• I will begin by US ….if equivocal we will arrange MRI abdomen.
• If contraindications to MRI exam…or MRI unavailble ..
• we will arrange CT (sit with CT tec …to decrease milli amp..Kvp..increase pitch…modulate Z axis…use barium to decrease fetal exposure )
![Page 42: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
![Page 43: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
MRI findings in acute appendicitis
![Page 44: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Catarrhal appendicitis
![Page 45: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Appendiceal phlegmon.
![Page 46: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Examples of daily questions..!
• Pregnant lady with chest pain..discomfort ..etc….is it pulmonary embolism ?.
• Pregnant lady with trauma (RTA)?• Old patient ..post cardiac surgery …Is it
bowel ischaemia ..?• Intestinal obstruction…
![Page 47: Talking evidence based radiology](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58f352c81a28abc2258b45cd/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)