tanks lecture 3

Upload: frank-john

Post on 02-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    1/70

    Lecture 3

    January 23, 2006

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    2/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 2

    In this lecture

    Modeling of tanks Time period of tanks

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    3/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 3

    Modeling of tanks

    As seen in Lecture 1 liquid may be replaced byimpulsive and convective mass for calculation ofhydrodynamic forces

    See next slide for a quick review

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    4/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 4

    Modeling of tanks

    Rigid

    mc

    Kc/2Kc/2

    mihi

    (hi*)

    hc

    (hc*)

    mi= Impulsive liquid mass

    mc= Convective liquid mass

    Kc= Convective spring stiffness

    hi= Location of impulsive mass(without considering overturnig

    caused by base pressure)

    hc= Location of convective mass(without considering overturning

    caused by base pressure)

    hi*= Location of impulsive mass

    (including base pressure effect onoverturning)

    hc*= Location of convective mass

    (including base pressure effect onoverturning)

    Mechanical analogue

    orspring mass model of tank

    Graphs and expression for these parameters are given in lecture 1.

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    5/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 5

    Approximation in modeling

    Sometimes, summation of miand mcmay not beequal to total liquid mass, m

    This difference may be about 2 to 3 %

    Difference arises due to approximations in the

    derivation of these expressions More about it, later

    If this difference is of concern, then

    First, obtain mcfrom the graph or expression

    Obtain mi = m mc

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    6/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 6

    Tanks of other shapes

    For tank shapes such as Intze, funnel, etc. : Consider equivalent circular tank of same

    volume, with diameter equal to diameter at thetop level of liquid

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    7/70Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 7

    Tanks of other shapes

    Example:An Intze container has volume of 1000 m3. Diameter ofcontainer at top level of liquid is 16 m. Find dimensions ofequivalent circular container for computation of

    hydrodynamic forces.

    Equivalent circular container will have diameter of 16 m

    and volume of 1000 m3.Height of liquid, h can be obtained

    as :/4 x 162x h = 1000

    h = 1000 x 4/(x 162) = 4.97 m

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    8/70Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 8

    Tanks of other shapes

    Thus, for equivalent circular container,h/D = 4.97/16 = 0.31

    All the parameters (such as mi, mcetc.) are to beobtained using h/D = 0.31

    16 m

    Intze containervolume = 1000 m3

    16 m 4.97 m

    Equivalent circular container

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    9/70Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 9

    Effect of obstructions inside tank

    Container may have structural elements inside For example: central shaft, columns supporting

    the roof slab, and baffle walls

    These elements cause obstruction to lateral

    motion of liquid

    This will affect impulsive and convective masses

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    10/70Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 10

    Effect of obstructions inside tank

    Effect of these obstructions on impulsive andconvective mass is not well studied

    A good research topic !

    It is clear that these elements will reduceconvective (or sloshing) mass

    More liquid will act as impulsive mass

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    11/70Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 11

    Effect of obstructions inside tank

    In the absence of detailed analysis, followingapproximation may be adopted:

    Consider a circular or a rectangular container ofsame height and without any internal elements

    Equate the volume of this container to netvolume of original container

    This will give diameter or lateral dimensions of container

    Use this container to obtain h/D or h/L

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    12/70Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 12

    Effect of obstructions inside tank

    Example: A circular cylindrical container has internaldiameter of 12 m and liquid height of 4 m. At the centerof the tank there is a circular shaft of outer diameter of2 m. Find the dimensions of equivalent circularcylindrical tank.

    12 m

    4 m

    Hollow shaft of2 m diameter

    12 m

    Elevation

    Plan

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    13/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 13

    Effect of obstructions inside tank

    Solution:Net volume of container = /4x(12222)x4 = 439.8 m3

    Equivalent cylinder will have liquid height of 4 m and itsvolume has to be 439.8 m3.

    Let D be the diameter of equivalent circular cylinder, then/4xD2x4 = 439.8 m3

    D = 11.83 m

    Thus, for equivalent circular tank, h = 4 m, D = 11.83mand h/D = 4/11.83 = 0.34.

    This h/D shall be used to find parameters of mechanicalmodel of tank

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    14/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 14

    Effect of wall flexibility

    Parameters mi, mcetc. are obtained assumingtank wall to be rigid

    An assumption in the original work of Housner(1963a)

    Housner, G. W., 1963a, Dynamic analysis of fluids incontainers subjected to acceleration, Nuclear Reactors andEarthquakes, Report No. TID 7024, U. S. Atomic EnergyCommission, Washington D.C.

    RC tank walls are quite rigid

    Steel tank walls may be flexible

    Particularly, in case of tall steel tanks

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    15/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 15

    Effect of wall flexibility

    Wall flexibility affects impulsive pressure distribution It does not substantially affect convective pressuredistribution

    Refer Veletsos, Haroun and Housner (1984) Veletsos, A. S., 1984, Seismic response and design of liquid

    storage tanks, Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gaspipeline systems, Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake1Engineering, ASCE, N.Y., 255-370, 443-461.

    Haroun, M. A. and Housner, G. W., 1984, Seismic design of liquidstorage tanks, Journal of Technical Councils of ASCE, Vol. 107,TC1, 191-207.

    Effect of wall flexibility on impulsive pressure dependson Aspect ratio of tank Ratio of wall thickness to diameter

    See next slide

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    16/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 16

    Effect of wall flexibility

    Effect of wall flexibility on impulsive pressure distribution

    From Veletsos (1984)

    h

    z Rigidtank

    tw/ D = 0.0005

    tw/ D = 0.0005

    Impulsive pressure on wall

    twis wall thickness

    h/D = 0.5

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    17/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 17

    Effect of wall flexibility

    If wall flexibility is included, then mechanicalmodel of tank becomes more complicated

    Moreover, its inclusion does not change seismicforces appreciably

    Thus, mechanical model based on rigid wallassumption is considered adequate for design.

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    18/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 18

    Effect of wall flexibility

    All international codes use rigid wall model forRC as well as steel tanks Only exception is NZSEE recommendation

    (Priestley et al., 1986) Priestley, M J N, et al., 1986, Seismic design of storage

    tanks, Recommendations of a study group of the NewZealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering.

    American Petroleum Institute (API) standards,which are exclusively for steel tanks, also use

    mechanical model based on rigid wallassumption API 650, 1998, Welded storage tanks for oil storage,

    American Petroleum Institute, Washington D. C., USA.

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    19/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 19

    Effect of higher modes

    miand mc described in Lecture 1, correspondto first impulsive and convective modes For most tanks ( 0.15 < h/D < 1.5) the first

    impulsive and convective modes togetheraccount for 85 to 98% of total liquid mass

    Hence, higher modes are not included

    This is also one of the reasons for summation ofmiand mcbeing not equal to total liquid mass

    For more information refer Veletsos (1984) andMalhotra (2000)

    Malhotra, P. K., Wenk, T. and Wieland, M., 2000, Simpleprocedure for seismic analysis of liquid-storage tanks,Structural Engineering International, 197-201.

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    20/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 20

    Modeling of ground supported tanks

    Step 1: Obtain various parameters of mechanical model

    These include, mi, mc, Kc, hi, hc, hi*and hc

    *

    Step 2:

    Calculate mass of tank wall (mw), mass of roof(mt) and mass of base slab (mb)of container

    This completes modeling of ground supported

    tanks

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    21/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 21

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    Elevated tank consists of container and staging

    Elevated tank

    Container

    Staging

    Wall

    Roof slab

    Floor slab

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    22/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 22

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    Liquid is replaced by impulsive and convectivemasses, miand mc All other parameters such as hi, hc, etc, shall be

    obtained as described earlier

    Lateral stiffness, Ks, of staging must beconsidered

    This makes it a two-degree-of-freedom model

    Also called two mass idealization

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    23/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 23

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    hi

    mc

    mi hc

    hs

    Spring mass model Two degree of freedom system

    OR

    Two mass idealization of elevated tanks

    Ks

    mi + ms

    mc

    KcKc/2 Kc/2

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    24/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 24

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    msis structural mass, which comprises of : Mass of container, and

    One-third mass of staging

    Mass of container includes

    Mass of roof slab

    Mass of wall

    Mass of floor slab and beams

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    25/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 25

    Two Degree of Freedom System

    2-DoF system requires solution of a 2 2 eigenvalue problem to obtain

    Two natural time periods

    Corresponding mode shapes

    See any standard text book on structuraldynamics on how to solve 2-DoF system

    For most elevated tanks, the two natural time

    periods (T1and T2) are well separated. T1 generally may exceed 2.5 times T2.

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    26/70

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    27/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 27

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    Ks

    mi+ m

    s

    mc

    Kc

    Two degree of freedom system

    Ks

    mi + ms

    mc

    Kc

    Two uncoupled

    single degree of freedom systems

    when T1 2.5 T2

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    28/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 28

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    Priestley et al. (1986) suggested that thisapproximation is reasonable if ratio of two timeperiods exceeds 2.5

    Important to note that this approximation is

    done only for the purpose of calculating timeperiods

    This significantly simplifies time period calculation

    Otherwise, one can obtain time periods of 2-DoFsystem as per procedure of structural dynamics.

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    29/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 29

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    Steps in modeling of elevated tanks Step 1:

    Obtain parameters of mechanical analogue

    These include mi, mc, Kc, hi, hc, hi*and hc

    *

    Other tank shapes and obstructions inside the container shallbe handled as described earlier

    Step 2:

    Calculate mass of container and mass of staging

    Step 3:

    Obtain stiffness of staging

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    30/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 30

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    Recall, in IS 1893:1984, convective mass is notconsidered

    It assumes entire liquid will act as impulsive mass

    Hence, elevated tank is modeled as single

    degree of freedom ( SDoF) system

    As against this, now, elevated tank is modeledas 2-DoF system

    This 2-DoF system can be treated as twouncoupled SDoF systems

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    31/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 31

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    Models of elevated tanks

    Ks

    mi + ms

    mc

    Kc

    Ks

    m +ms m = Total l iquid mass

    As per the Guideline As per IS 1893:1984

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    32/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 32

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    Example: An elevated tank with circular cylindricalcontainer has internal diameter of 11.3 m and waterheight is 3 m. Container mass is 180 t and staging massis 100 t. Lateral stiffness of staging is 20,000 kN/m.Model the tank using the Guideline and IS 1893:1984

    Solution:

    Internal diameter, D = 11.3 m, Water height, h = 3 m.

    Container is circular cylinder,

    Volume of water = /4 x D2x h= /4 x 11.32x 3 = 300.9 m3.

    mass of water, m = 300.9 t.

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    33/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 33

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    h/D = 3/11.3 = 0.265From Figure 2 of the Guideline, for h/D = 0.265:

    mi/m = 0.31, mc/m = 0.65 and Kch/mg = 0.47

    mi = 0.31 x m = 0.31 x 300.9 = 93.3 tmc= 0.65 x m = 0.65 x 300.9 = 195.6 t

    Kc= 0.47 x mg/h

    = 0.47 x 300.9 x 9.81/3 = 462.5 kN/m

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    34/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 34

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    Mass of container = 180 tMass of staging = 100 t

    Structural mass of tank, ms

    = mass of container +1/3rdmass of staging= 180 +1/3 x 100

    = 213.3 t

    Lateral stiffness of staging,Ks= 20,000 kN/m

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    35/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 35

    Modeling of elevated tanks

    Ks

    mi + ms

    mc

    Kc

    Ks

    m+ ms

    Model of tank as perthe Guideline Model of tank as perIS 1893:1984

    mi= 93.3 t, ms= 213.3 t, mc= 195.6 t,Ks= 20,000 kN/m, Kc= 462.5 kN/m

    m = 300.9 t, ms= 213.3 t,Ks= 20,000 kN/m

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    36/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 36

    Time period

    What is time period ? For a single degree of freedom system, time

    period (T ) is given by

    K

    MT 2

    M is mass and K is stiffness

    T is in seconds M should be in kg; K should be in Newton per

    meter (N/m)

    Else, M can be in Tonnes and K in kN/m

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    37/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 37

    Time period

    Mathematical model of tank comprises ofimpulsive and convective components

    Hence, time periods of impulsive and convectivemode are to be obtained

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    38/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 38

    Time period of impulsive mode

    Procedure to obtain time period of impulsivemode (Ti) will be described for following threecases:

    Ground supported circular tanks

    Ground supported rectangular tanks Elevated tanks

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    39/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 39

    Ti for ground-supported circular tanks

    Ground supported circular tanks Time period of impulsive mode, Tiis given by:

    Et/D

    h

    CT ii

    2i

    0.067(h/D)0.3h/D0.46h/D

    1

    C

    = Mass density of liquidE = Youngs modulus of tank material

    t = Wall thickness

    h = Height of liquid

    D = Diameter of tank

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    40/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 40

    Tifor ground-supported circular tanks

    Ci can also be obtained from Figure 5 of theGuidelines

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2

    Ci

    Cc

    h/D

    C

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    41/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 41

    Tifor ground-supported circular tanks

    This formula is taken from Eurocode 8 Eurocode 8, 1998, Design provisions for earthquake

    resistance of structures, Part 1- General rules and Part 4 Silos, tanks and pipelines, European Committee forStandardization, Brussels.

    If wall thickness varies with height, thenthickness at 1/3rdheight from bottom shall beused

    Some steel tanks may have step variation of wallthickness with height

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    42/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 42

    Tifor ground-supported circular tanks

    This formula is derived based on assumptionthat wall mass is quite small compared to liquidmass

    More information on time period of circular

    tanks may be seen in Veletsos (1984) andNachtigall et al. (2003)

    Nachtigall, I., Gebbeken, N. and Urrutia-Galicia, J. L., 2003, On theanalysis of vertical circular cylindrical tanks under earthquakeexcitation at its base, Engineering Structures, Vol. 25, 201-213.

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    43/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 43

    Tifor ground-supported circular tanks

    It is important to note that wall flexibility isconsidered in this formula

    For tanks with rigid wall, time period will be zero

    This should not be confused with rigid wall

    assumption in the derivation of miand mc Wall flexibility is neglected only in the evaluation

    of impulsive and convective masses

    However, wall flexibility is included while

    calculating time period

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    44/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 44

    Tifor ground-supported circular tanks

    This formula is applicable to tanks with fixedbase condition

    i.e., tank wall is rigidly connected or fixed to thebase slab

    In some circular tanks, wall and base haveflexible connections

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    45/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 45

    Tifor ground-supported circular tanks

    Ground supported tanks with flexible base aredescribed in ACI 350.3 and AWWA D-110 ACI 350.3, 2001, Seismic design of liquid containing

    concrete structures, American Concrete Institute,Farmington Hill, MI, USA.

    AWWA D-110, 1995, Wire- and strand-wound circular,prestressed concrete water tanks, American Water WorksAssociation, Colorado, USA.

    In these tanks, there is a flexible pad between

    wall and base Refer Figure 6 of the Guideline

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    46/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 46

    Tifor ground-supported circular tanks

    Such tanks are perhaps not used in India

    Types of connections between tank wall and base slab

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    47/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 47

    Tifor ground-supported circular tanks

    Impulsive mode time period of groundsupported tanks with fixed base is generallyvery low

    These tanks are quite rigid

    Tiwill usually be less than 0.4 seconds

    In this short period range, spectral acceleration,Sa/g has constant value

    See next slide

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    48/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 48

    Tifor ground-supported circular tanks

    Impulsive mode time period of ground supportedtanks likely to remain in this range

    Sa/g

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    49/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 49

    Tifor ground-supported circular tanks

    Example: A ground supported steel tank has waterheight, h = 25 m, internal diameter, D = 15 m andwall thickness, t=15 mm. Find time period ofimpulsive mode.

    Solution:h = 25 m, D = 15 m, t = 15 mm.

    For water, mass density, = 1 t/m3.

    For steel, Youngs modulus, E = 2x108kN/m2.

    h/D = 25/15 = 1.67. From Figure 5, Ci = 5.3

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    50/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 50

    Tifor ground-supported circular tanks

    Et/D

    hCT ii Time period of impulsive mode,

    8i

    2x100.015/15

    1.0255.3T

    = 0.30 sec

    Important to note that, even for such a slender tank of

    steel, time period is low. For RC tanks and other short tanks, time period will be

    further less.

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    51/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 51

    Tifor ground-supported circular tanks

    In view of this, no point in putting too muchemphasis on evaluation of impulsive mode timeperiod for ground supported tanks

    Recognizing this point, API standards have

    suggested a constant value of spectralacceleration for ground supported circular steeltanks

    Thus, users of API standards need not findimpulsive time period of ground supported tanks

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    52/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 52

    Tifor ground-supported rectangulartanks

    Tifor ground-supported rectangular tanks Procedure to find time period of impulsive mode

    is described in Clause no. 4.3.1.2 of theGuidelines

    This will not be repeated here

    Time period is likely to be very low and Sa/g willremain constant

    As described earlier Hence, not much emphasis on time period

    evaluation

    f l d k

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    53/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 53

    Ti for Elevated tanks

    For elevated tanks, flexibility of staging is important Time period of impulsive mode, Tiis given by:

    s

    sii

    K

    mm2T

    mi= Impulsive mass of liquid

    ms= Mass of container and one-third mass of staging

    Ks= Lateral stiffness of staging= Horizontal deflection of center of gravity of tank when a

    horizontal force equal to (mi+ ms)g is applied at the

    center of gravity of tank

    ORg

    2T

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    54/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 54

    Ti for Elevated tanks

    These two formulae are one and the same Expressed in terms of different quantities

    Center of gravity of tank refers to combinedmass center of empty container plus impulsive

    mass of liquid

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    55/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 55

    Ti for Elevated tanks

    Example: An elevated tank stores 250 t of water. Ratio ofwater height to internal diameter of container is 0.5.Container mass is 150 t and staging mass is 90 t.Lateral stiffness of staging is 20,000 kN/m. Find timeperiod of impulsive mode

    Solution: h/D = 0.5, Hence from Figure 2a of theGuideline, mi/m = 0.54;

    mi= 0.54 x 250 = 135 t

    Structural mass of tank, ms

    = mass of container + 1/3rdmass of staging

    = 150 + 90/3 = 180 t

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    56/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 56

    Ti for Elevated tanks

    Time period of impulsive modes

    si

    iK

    mm2T

    00020

    180135

    2 ,Ti

    = 0.79 sec.

    L t l tiff f t i K

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    57/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 57

    Lateral stiffness of staging, Ks

    Lateral stiffness of staging, Ksis force requiredto be applied at CG of tank to cause acorresponding unit horizontal deflection

    CGP Ks= P/

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    58/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 58

    Lateral stiffness of staging, Ks

    For frame type staging, lateral stiffness shall beobtained by suitably modeling columns andbraces More information can be seen in Sameer and

    Jain (1992, 1994) Sameer, S. U., and Jain, S. K., 1992, Approximate

    methods for determination of time period of water tankstaging, The Indian Concrete Journal, Vol. 66, No. 12,691-698.

    Sameer, S. U., and Jain, S. K., 1994, Lateral load analysis

    of frame staging for elevated water tanks, Journal ofStructural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.120, No.5, 1375-1393.

    Some commonly used frame type stagingconfigurations are shown in next slide

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    59/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 59

    Lateral stiffness of staging, Ks

    4 columns 6 columns 8 columns

    9 columns 12 columns

    Plan view of frame staging configurations

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    60/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 60

    Lateral stiffness of staging, Ks

    24 columns 52 columns

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    61/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 61

    Lateral stiffness of staging, Ks

    Explanatory handbook, SP:22 has consideredbraces as rigid beams SP:22 1982, Explanatory Handbook on Codes for

    Earthquake Engineering, Bureau of Indian Standards, NewDelhi

    This is unrealistic modeling Leads to lower time period

    Hence, higher base shear coefficient

    This is another limitation of IS 1893:1984

    Using a standard structural analysis software,staging can be modeled and analyzed toestimate lateral stiffness

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    62/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 62

    Lateral stiffness of staging, Ks

    Shaft type staging can be treated as a verticalcantilever fixed at base and free at top

    If flexural behavior is dominant, then

    Its stiffness will be Ks= 3EI/L3

    This will be a good approximation if height todiameter ratio is greater than two

    Otherwise, shear deformations of shaft wouldaffect the stiffness and should be included.

    Time period of convective mode

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    63/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 63

    Time period of convective mode

    Convective mass is mcand stiffness is Kc Time period of convective mode is:

    c

    c

    c K

    m

    T

    2

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    64/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 64

    Time period of convective mode

    mcand Kcfor circular and rectangular tanks canbe obtained from graphs or expressions

    These are described in Lecture 1

    Refer Figures 2 and 3 of the Guidelines

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    65/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 65

    Time period of convective mode

    For further simplification, expressions for mcand Kcare substituted in the formula for Tc Then one gets,

    )/68.3(68.3

    2

    DhtanhCc

    D/gCT cc

    L/gCT cc

    For circular tanks:

    For rectangular tanks:

    ))/(16.3(16.3

    2

    LhtanhCc

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    66/70

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    67/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 67

    Time period of convective mode

    Fig. 5 For circular tanks

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2

    Ci

    Cc

    C

    h/D

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    68/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 68

    Time period of convective mode

    2

    4

    6

    8

    0

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2

    Fig. 7 For rectangular tanks

    h/L

    Cc

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    69/70

    Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 3 / Slide 69

    Time period of convective mode

    Example: For a circular tank of internal diameter, 12 mand liquid height of 4 m. Calculate time period ofconvective mode.

    Solution: h = 4 m, D = 12 m,

    h/D = 4/12 = 0.33

    From Figure 5 of the Guidelines, Cc= 3.6

    D/gCTcc

    Time period of convective mode,

    12/9.813.6Tc = 3.98 sec

    At the end of Lecture 3

  • 8/10/2019 Tanks Lecture 3

    70/70

    At the end of Lecture 3

    Based on mechanical models, time period forimpulsive and convective modes can beobtained for ground supported and elevatedtanks

    For ground supported tanks, impulsive modetime period is likely to be very less

    Convective mode time period can be very large