tap but font tell - order 1

Upload: apargupta

Post on 09-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Tap but Font Tell - Order 1

    1/3

  • 8/8/2019 Tap but Font Tell - Order 1

    2/3

    Ms. Nisha B., Adv.

    Ms. D.Hazarika, Adv.

    Ms. Sumita Hazarika, Adv.

    UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

    O R D E R

    I.A. No.2 of 2010

    This is an application by Dr. J.K.Jain, s/o late Mr. Lala Ilam

    Chand Jain, r/o 6B/6, Siri Fort Institutional Area, New Delhi-110

    049 for being allowed to intervene in the proceedings of the writ

    petition. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and

    the learned Attorney General appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4

    say that they do not have any objection.

    In view of the above, Interlocutory Application No.2

    allowed in terms of the prayer made.

    I.A. No.3 of 2010

    This is an application by Chennai Press Club, a registered

    society under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 for

    permission to be impleaded as party respondent.

    We have heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned

    senior counsel for the petitioner and the learned Attorney General

    and are convinced that the applicant is neither a necessary nor a

    proper party for the purpose of deciding the issue raised in the

    writ petition. Therefore, the prayer for impleadment is rejected.

    However, we grant leave to the applicant to act as an intervenor inthe proceedings of the writ petition.

    3

    I.A. No..... of 2010 in WP(C)No.398/2010

    This application has been presented in the Court on behalf of

    Centre for Public Interest Litigation through its General Secretary

    for permission to act as an intervenor in the proceeding of the

    writ petition.

    Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and the

    learned Attorney General appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 say

    that they do not have any objection.

    In view of the above, the Interlocutory Application is allowed

    in terms of the prayer made.

    Dr.Rajeev Dhavan and Shri Anil Divan, learned senior counsel

    appearing for respondent Nos.5 and 6 respectively request that

    their instructing counsel may be given some time to file counter

    Page 2 of 3

    12/20/2010http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/temp/wc%2039810p.txt

  • 8/8/2019 Tap but Font Tell - Order 1

    3/3

    affidavit.

    Shri Harish N.Salve, learned senior counsel appearing for the

    petitioner says that his instructing counsel will file a

    supplementary affidavit and rejoinder to the counter of respondent

    Nos.1 to 3 by first week of January, 2011.

    Reply affidavits on behalf of respondent Nos.5 and 6 may be

    filed within next three weeks.

    List the case on 02.02.2011.

    Learned Attorney General may produce in a sealed envelope copy

    of the complaint referred to in para 6 of the counter affidavit.

    ( Satish K.Yadav ) ( Phoolan Wati Arora )

    Court Master Court Master

    Page 3 of 3

    12/20/2010http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/temp/wc%2039810p.txt